an argument essay death sentence should be abolished

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is a controversial practice that has been used for
centuries to punish the most serious crimes(GS). While some argue that it serves as a necessary form of
justice, others believe that it is ethically problematic, ineffective, and costly. In this essay, I will argue
that the death penalty should be abolished due to its ethical concerns, ineffectiveness, and high
costs(The.S).

One of the most significant arguments against the death penalty is its potential for executing innocent
people(TS). The American Civil Liberties Union reports that since 1973, over 175 people have been
released from death row after being exonerated of their crimes. This is a sobering reminder of the fact
that the criminal justice system is fallible, and the risk of wrongful execution is simply too high.In
addition, the arbitrary application of the death penalty raises serious ethical concerns. Studies have
consistently shown that race, socioeconomic status, and geography all play a significant role in
determining who receives the death penalty. This means that individuals from certain communities or
backgrounds are disproportionately likely to be sentenced to death, regardless of the severity of their
crimes.Finally, there is also a moral argument against state-sanctioned killing. The death penalty
requires the state to take a life, which raises questions about the morality of such an act. Many argue
that it is hypocritical for the state to punish murder with murder, and that the death penalty only
perpetuates a cycle of violence and vengeance.

Another argument against the death penalty is its lack of deterrence effect(TS). Numerous studies have
shown that the death penalty does not serve as an effective deterrent to crime. In fact, some research
has suggested that the death penalty may even increase homicide rates by legitimizing the use of
violence as a means of resolving conflicts.In addition, the death penalty has failed to reduce crime rates.
States that have abolished the death penalty have not seen an increase in crime, and many have actually
experienced a decrease. This suggests that the death penalty is not necessary for public safety and that
alternatives should be explored.

Finally, the death penalty is incredibly expensive(TS). Death penalty cases are more complex and require
more resources than other criminal cases, which means that they come at a higher cost. According to
the Death Penalty Information Center, death penalty cases are estimated to cost taxpayers four times
more than non-death penalty cases.Furthermore, the costs of the death penalty go beyond just financial
costs. Investing in the death penalty takes resources away from other important criminal justice
initiatives, such as crime prevention and rehabilitation programs. This means that the death penalty is
not only expensive, but it also has an opportunity cost.

In conclusion, the death penalty should be abolished due to its ethical concerns,ineffectiveness, and
high costs. The risk of executing innocent people, arbitrary application, and moral questions surrounding
state-sanctioned killing are significant ethical concerns. Ineffectiveness in terms of deterrence and crime
reduction, as well as the high financial and opportunity costs associated with death penalty cases, make
it a wasteful and ineffective practice.Therefore, it is time for society to reconsider the use of the death
penalty and shift towards alternative forms of punishment that prioritize rehabilitation and
reintegration. It is our collective responsibility to ensure a fair and just criminal justice system that
upholds the values of human dignity and social justice. It is time for the abolition of the death penalty.

References list:

1. "Facts about the Death Penalty." Death Penalty Information Center, 2021,
deathpenaltyinfo.org/facts-and-research/facts-about-the-death-penalty.

2. "Race and the Death Penalty." American Civil Liberties Union, 2021, aclu.org/issues/capital-
punishment/race-and-death-penalty.

3. Zimring, Franklin E. "The Death Penalty Is a Waste of Time and Resources." Los Angeles Times,
19 May 2016, latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-zimring-death-penalty-waste-of-resources-
20160519-snap-story.html.

4. "The Ethics of Capital Punishment." The New York Times, 16 Nov. 2014,
nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/11/16/the-ethics-of-capital-punishment.

Franklin E. Zimring argues that the death penalty is a waste of time and resources. He explains
that the cost of maintaining a system of capital punishment is very high, and that this money
could be better spent on other programs, such as education or law enforcement. He also points
out that the death penalty does not effectively deter crime, and that many of the individuals
sentenced to death are later found to be innocent. Zimring concludes that the death penalty is a
flawed and inefficient system that should be abolished in favor of more effective
alternatives.This article from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) discusses the issue of
race and the death penalty in the United States. It provides statistics and research on the
disproportionate impact of the death penalty on people of color, particularly African Americans.
The article also discusses the role of racial bias in the criminal justice system and how it can
contribute to wrongful convictions and death sentences.The ACLU argues that the death penalty
is not only unjust, but also ineffective and expensive. It advocates for the abolition of the death
penalty and for the use of alternative sentencing options that are fairer and more just. The
article provides links to additional resources and information on the issue of race and the death
penalty.This article provides various statistics and information related to the use of the death
penalty in the United States. It covers topics such as the number of executions and death
sentences, the demographics of those on death row, and the costs associated with capital
punishment. The article also explores issues such as the possibility of executing an innocent
person and the role of race in death penalty sentencing. It is a comprehensive resource for
anyone interested in learning about the current state of the death penalty in the US.

Text source:DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER. Facts about the Death Penalty. 1701 K St. NW,
Suite 205. Washington, DC 20006 www.deathpenaltyinfo.org.
 Traffic jam in Dhaka

Traffic congestion is a significant problem in Dhaka, the capital city of Bangladesh(GS). It has become
one of the most significant challenges that the city is facing today. The issue is complicated, and the
consequences are far-reaching, including time waste, environmental pollution, and a decrease in the
economy's productivity. Therefore, it is essential to address this issue before it becomes more severe.
This essay will discuss the causes and effects of traffic congestion in Dhaka, along with possible
solutions(The.S).

Traffic congestion in Dhaka has many reasons(TS). Firstly, the city's population has increased
dramatically over the years, leading to a rise in the number of vehicles on the roads. Secondly, the
inadequate infrastructure of the city, including insufficient roads and insufficient parking areas,
contributes significantly to the problem. Thirdly, a lack of public transport facilities causes many people
to use private vehicles. Traffic congestion has numerous effects on the city. The most notable effect is
time wastage. Commuters have to spend hours in traffic, causing them to arrive late for work or miss
appointments. Additionally, traffic congestion leads to environmental pollution, causing harm to public
health. Finally, traffic congestion has a negative impact on the economy, as it decreases productivity and
hinders business operations.

One possible solution to reduce traffic congestion in Dhaka is to construct more flyovers(TS). Flyovers
are a cost-effective and efficient way to improve traffic flow. They reduce travel time, fuel consumption,
and air pollution. However, the construction of flyovers can be challenging, as it requires adequate
resources, time, and land space. Moreover, flyovers may not be suitable for all areas of the city, and
their construction may cause traffic disruptions.

Another solution to reduce traffic congestion is to ban rickshaws on main roads(TS). Rickshaws are a
common mode of transportation in Dhaka, but they also contribute to traffic congestion. Banning
rickshaws on main roads could significantly reduce traffic, but it may also cause hardship for rickshaw
drivers who depend on them for their livelihood. Furthermore, it may not be possible to enforce the ban
on rickshaws effectively.

A third solution is to train drivers on road safety and traffic rules(TS). This solution can be an effective
way to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. Properly trained drivers can navigate through the
city more efficiently, reducing the chances of accidents and improving the overall flow of traffic.
However, training drivers can be a time-consuming and costly process. It may also be challenging to
enforce road safety and traffic rules.

In conclusion, traffic congestion is a severe problem in Dhaka, and it requires immediate attention. This
essay has discussed the causes and effects of traffic congestion and offered three potential solutions:
constructing more flyovers, banning rickshaws on main roads, and training drivers. Each solution has its
advantages and disadvantages, and it is essential to evaluate them carefully before implementing any
solution. It is crucial to work together to find an effective solution to reduce traffic congestion in Dhaka,
as it will have significant benefits for the city's economy, environment, and the quality of life of its
residents.

Reference List:

 Hossain, M. A., & Rahman, M. M. (2019). Traffic congestion in Dhaka city: Problems and
solutions. International Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 8(6), 219-224.

 Hossain, M. J., Paul, S. K., & Ali, M. S. (2020). Effects of traffic congestion on air quality in Dhaka
city: A review. Journal of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, 13(1), 107-118.

 Islam, M. R., & Anowar, S. (2020). Road transportation in Dhaka city: Challenges and solutions.
International Journal of Transportation Engineering and Technology, 6(2), 27-35.

Traffic congestion is the result of too much traffic trying to use the available road space (OECD,
2007); inother words, traffic demand exceeds the supply of road space. Demand increases due
to rising urbanpopulation, increasing numbers of lower-capacity vehicles (e.g. cars, rickshaws,
CNG's and motor-cycles), and insufficient public transport (buses, rail, etc.). Meanwhile, limited
supply of road spaceoccurs in all urban areas worldwide, but especially in Dhaka due poor urban
planning and poormanagement of the available road space. Faced with growing traffic
congestion, the city authorities have three basic options Adapt the city to the traffic – e.g. build
more roads, flyovers, metros, multi-storey car parks,etc. to meet the growing demand; and in
the longer-term, limit building densities anddecentralise growth to other areas;2.Adapt the
traffic to the city – e.g. ration road space and promote higher capacity transportthrough traffic
management, travel demand management and investment in public transport;3.Do nothing –
allow traffic to be 'self-regulating' so that people adapt to congestion in variousways (e.g. by
using different modes, choosing different routes, avoiding busy times, orrelocating in the longer
term).In practice, a city authority's response to traffic congestion is usually a combination of all
threeapproaches, though in Dhaka more emphasis has been given in the past to 'adapting the
city to thetraffic' than 'adapting the traffic to the city'.

Text source: Traffic Congestion in Dhaka City