Assessment Tools Reviewer

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

TOPIC: Pediatric Assessment Tool movement against

DATE: 01/31/2023 gravity


SUBJECT: PEDIA PT o Section 4
 Tester’s clinical
impression of the
HARRIS INFANT NEUROMOTOR infant’s development
TEST (HINT)  Administration:
o 15 to 30 minutes
 Target Population: 2.5 to 12.5
o Infant handling is minimal;
months of age
 Early screening tool for potential primarily observational
developmental disorders in both  Scoring:
high and low risk infants o Total scores are derived from
 Higher risk for developmental delay a sum of all scores for each of
= referred for more extensive of the 21 motor behavior items
motor delay  Interpretation
 Measures: o Lower HINT total scores =
o Infant motor behavior more mature
o Behavioral state o Higher HINT total scores =
o Head circumference less desirable
o Parent/caregiver concerns TEST OF INFANT MOTOR
about the infant’s PERFORMANCE (TIMPS)
development
 To assess posture and movement of
 Type: Norm-referenced neuromotor,
cognitive, behavioral screening tool infants from 34 weeks
postmenstrual age through 4
 Content: Four sections:
months corrected age
o Section 1
 For use with infants in intensive care
 Infant’s background
nurseries (NICU), developmental
info
follow-up clinics, and early
o Section 2
intervention programs
 Five (5) questions  Observed scale of 13 dichotomously
assessing caregiver’s scored items used to examine an
perception of the infant’s spontaneous movements
infant’s movement
 An elicited scale of 29 items tests the
and play
infant’s movement responses to
o Section 3
various position, sights, and sounds
 Twenty-one (21)  According to the test authors, the
items assessing the processes tested by the items include
infant’s motor skills the following:
in five positions, o The ability to orient and
muscle tone,
stabilize the head in space
and in response to auditory
and visual stimulation in  It was developed to incorporate
supine, prone, side-lying, and components of motor development,
upright positions and during which are deemed essential to the
transitions from one position evaluation and treatment of at-risk
to another infants.
o Body alignment when the  Sequential development of postural
head is manipulated control relative to four postural
o Distal selective control of the positions: supine, prone, sitting, and
fingers, wrists, hands, and standing is assessed through
ankles observation.
o Antigravity control of arm  The test includes 58 items organized
and leg movements into four positions:
 Administration: 25 to 40 minutes o prone, supine, sitting, and
(depending of the child’s abilities, standing.
behavioral state, physiologic,  The distribution of these items is as
stability, and level of cooperation) follows: 21 prone, 9 supine, 12
 Scoring: 1 present 0 absent sitting, and 16 standing.
o Elicited items are  For each item, certain key
administered according to descriptors are identified that must
standardized instructions and be observed for the infant to pass the
involve direct handling of the items.
infant. Responses to these  Each item describes three aspects of
items are scored on a 3-, 4-, motor performance:
5-, or 6-point rating scales o weight-bearing
that describe specific o Posture
behaviors to be noted, o antigravity movements
ranging from less mature or  Administration
minimal response to mature o Minimal handling
or full response, as defined o Observed and not observed
individually for each test
 Interpretation
item.
o The higher the percentile
o Total raw scores range from 0
ranking, the less likely the
to 142.
infant is demonstrating a
ALBERTA INFANT MOTOR SCALE delay in motor development.
(AIMS)
GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION
 Assessment of gross motor MEASURE (GMFM)
performance
 Clinical measure designed to
 Infants from term (40 weeks after
evaluate change in gross motor
conception) through the age of
function in children with Cerebral
independent walking (0 to 18
Palsy
months of age).
 5 months to 16 years old.
 is appropriate for children whose o Object Manipulation (12
motor skills are at or below those of months and older)
a 5-year-old child without any motor  The Fine Motor Scale contains 98
disability. items divided into two subtests:
 The test includes 88 items that assess o Grasping (all ages)
motor function in 5 dimensions o Visual-Motor Integration (all
o (1) lying and rolling; ages)
o (2) sitting;  Administration
o (3) crawling and kneeling; o 45 to 60 minutes
o (4) standing; o Scored as 0, 1, or 2
o (5) walking, running, and  0 = The child cannot
jumping. or will not attempt the
 the test measures whether a child can item, or the attempt
complete the task independently. does not show that the
 Administration/Scoring skill is emerging.
o 0 = Does not Initiate  1 = The child’s
o 1 = Initiates (<10% of the performance shows a
task) clear resemblance to
o 2 = partially completes the the item mastery
task (10 to <100% of the criteria but does not
task) fully meet the criteria.
o 3 = task completion (This value allows for
emerging skills.)
o GMFM-88 is 45 to 60
 2 = The child
minutes
performs the item
PEABODY DEVELOPMENTAL according to the
MOTOR SCALES – SECOND EDITION criteria specified for
(PDMS-2) mastery.
 It was designed to assess motor skills BRUININKS-OSERETSKY TEST OF
in children from birth through 6 MOTOR PROFICIENCY – 2ND ED
years of age.
 Ages 4 through 21
 The PDMS-2 is divided into two
 designed to assess:
components:
o gross and fine motor
o the Gross Motor Scale
functioning in children
o the Fine Motor Scale
o for diagnosis of motor
 Gross Motor Scale contains 151
impairments
items divided into four subtests:
o screen for motor deficits
o Reflexes (birth to 11 months)
o assist in educational
o Stationary (all ages),
placement decisions, and can
o Locomotion (all ages)
be used as a means for
planning and evaluating
various motor development Greenspan Social-
curricula Emotional Growth
 four motor-area composites Chart: A Screening
o Fine Manual Control Questionnaire for
o Manual Coordination Infants and Young
o Body Coordination Children
o Strength and Agility o Adaptive.
 Administration  adaptive skill
o 40 to 60 minutes; with an functioning in daily
life based on Adaptive
extra 10 minutes needed to
Behavior Assessment
prepare the testing area.
System, Second
o Two short testing sessions
Edition
are recommended for young
 1 month and 42 months of age.
children.
 Administration
BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT AND o For children aged 12 months
TODDLER DEVELOPMENT – 3RD ED and younger, administration
time is approximately 50
 identify children with developmental
minutes for the entire battery
delay and provide information for
o For children 13 months and
intervention planning.
older, the total administration
 assesses infant and toddler
time is 90 minutes
development across five domains:
o Based on an age-specific start
o Cognitive
point, the child must receive
 sensorimotor
a score of 1 on the first three
development,
consecutive items to move
exploration and
forward (basal level). If the
manipulation, object
child scores a 0 on the first
relatedness, concept
age-specific item, the
formation, memory,
examiner goes to previous
and other aspects of
age-specific item and applies
cognitive functioning
the same rule. The test is
o Language
discontinued for the
 receptive and
particular scale when the
expressive
child receives scores of 0 for
communication
five consecutive items
o Motor
(ceiling level).
 fine motor and gross
motor skills BATTELLE DEVELOPMENTAL
o Social-Emotional INVENTORY – 2ND ED
 social and emotional
 used to measure development in
milestones in children
children with and without
based on the
disabilities
 to screen for children at risk for units within a given
developmental delay activity.
 The BDI-2 measures development in o Caregiver Assistance
five domains:  measure disability of
o Adaptive children with respect
o Personal-Social to the amount of help
o Communication they need to carry out
o Motor functional activities.
o Cognitive.
 The BDI-2 is appropriate for children
from birth to 7 years, 11 months. o Modifications.
 Administration  provides a frequency
o The BDI-2 contains three count of the type and
extent of
administration procedures:
environmental
structured test, observation,
modifications the
and parent interview.
child depends on to
o The complete BDI-2 can be
support functional
administered in 60 to 90
performance.
minutes, and 10 to 30
minutes for the Screening
Test.
PEDIATRIC EVALUATION OF
DISABILITY INVENTORY
 measures both the in three content
domains: FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE
o (1) self-care MEASURE FOR CHILDREN
o (2) mobility
 The Functional Independence
o (3) social function
Measure for Children (WeeFIM) is
 Functional performance is measured the pediatric adaptation of the
by the level of caregiver assistance Functional Independence Measure
and environmental modifications (FIM) for adults of the Uniform Data
needed to accomplish major System for Medical Rehabilitation.
functional activities.
 help monitor children with
 The content areas of self-care, disabilities as they grow into adults
mobility, and social function are who function at a maximum level of
assessed through three sets of independence
measurement scales:
 The WeeFIM-II system includes the
o Functional Skills
WeeFIM instrument, the WeeFIM
 designed to reflect instrument 0–3 Module, and an
meaningful functional Internet-based software
application with a report generator
and quarterly aggregate reports
 The latest revision of the WeeFIM
consists of 18 items within three
domains:
o Self-care (8 ITEMS)
o Mobility (5 ITEMS)
o Cognition (5 ITEMS)
 designed for use with children
between the ages of 6 months and 7
years, (but may be used with older
children with developmental
disabilities and mental ages less than
SCHOOL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT
7 years.)
 The WeeFIM is a measure of  response to the need for an effective
disability, not impairment, and is functional performance measure for
intended to measure what a child children attending elementary
with a disability actually does, not school.
what they ought to be able to do or  A reliable and valid assessment tool
might be able to do if circumstances specific to the student’s needs and
were different. abilities and performance within the
 Administration/Scoring school environment is necessary for
o direct observation of the child effective evaluation and service
o assessments may be planning.
completed by interviewing  Kindergarten through Grade 6.
parents or caregivers who are  The SFA consists of three sections:
familiar with the child’s o Participation
everyday activities.  general or special
o Each of the 18 items to education classrooms
assess the child’s function is  Playground
rated on a seven-level ordinal  transportation to/
scale, from (1) total from school
dependence to (7) complete  Bathroom
independence.  transitions to/from
class
 mealtimes.
o Task Supports
 Physical Task Support
 Assistance
 Physical Task Support
 Adaptations
 Cognitive/Behavioral 7, 8 to 12, and 13 to 18 years of
Task Support– age.
Assistance  The Peds-QL contains a pediatric
 and self-report for children 5 to 18
Cognitive/Behavioral years and a parent proxy report
Task Support– for children 2 to 18 years.
Adaptations.  The Peds-QL contains four
o Activity Performance. multidimensional scales:
 Physical Tasks o (1) Physical Functioning (8
 Cognitive/Behavioral items)
Tasks o (2) Emotional Functioning (5
 items)
o Activity Performance section o (3) Social Functioning (5
is used in measuring items)
performance in school-related o (4) School Functioning (5
functional activities such as items)
following school rules, using  And provides three summary scores:
school materials, and o (1) Total Scale Score (23
communicating needs. items)
PEDIATRIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE o (2) Physical Health
INVENTORY Summary Score (8 items)
o (3) Psychosocial
 designed to measure health- related Health Summary Score (15
quality of life in healthy children items)
and adolescents and those with
acute and chronic illnesses. PEDIATRIC OUTCOMES DATA-
 23-item Peds-Q Generic Core Scales COLLECTION INSTRUMENT
measure core dimensions of health as
 comprehensive measure of
delineated by the World Health
musculo-skeletal outcomes
Organization, as well as school
associated with pediatric orthopedic
functioning.
problems.
 The Peds-QL Generic Core Scales is
 It was created to measure outcomes
a multidimensional questionnaire,
that orthopedic treatment could
measuring health-related quality of
affect:
life pertaining to:
o upper and lower extremity
o Physical
motor skills
o Emotional
o relief of pain
o Social
o restoration of activity.
o school functioning
 The PODCI consists of:
 Developmentally appropriate forms o an Adolescent Self-Report
are available for children 2 to 4, 5 to
Outcomes Questionnaire
o an Adolescent Parent-Report scales (ranging from 1 to 4, 5,
Outcomes Questionnaire or 6).
o and a Pediatric Outcomes
Questionnaire
 The Pediatric Outcomes
Questionnaire is intended to be used
for children 2 to 10 years through
parent report; the Adolescent Parent-
Report Questionnaire is intended for
use in children between 11 and 18
years; and the Adolescent
 Self-Report Questionnaire is
intended for youth and children 11
to 18 years who can complete the
form independently.
 The Pediatric Outcomes
Questionnaire consists of 8 scales:
o Upper Extremity and
Physical Function Scale
o Transfer and Basic Mobility
Scale
o Sports/Physical Functioning
Scale
o Pain/Comfort Scale
o Treatment Expectations
Scale
o Happiness Scale
o Satisfaction with Symptoms
Scale
o Global Functioning Scale.
 The questionnaire contains 86
questions.
 Administration
o The Pediatric Outcomes
Questionnaire is completed
by a parent/guardian who has
knowledge of the child’s
condition with approximate
completion time of 10 to 20
minutes. Responses to
questions are rated on various

You might also like