The document discusses several pediatric assessment tools used to evaluate motor development in infants and young children:
1) The Harris Infant Neurodevelopment Test (HINT) assesses motor behavior, behavioral state, and parent concerns in infants 2.5-12.5 months through observation. Higher scores indicate less mature development.
2) The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) evaluates gross motor performance in infants from birth to independent walking through 58 items organized by position. Higher percentiles suggest less likely delay.
3) The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) assesses motor skills in children from birth to 6 years through tasks evaluating grasping, visual-motor integration, and object manipulation
The document discusses several pediatric assessment tools used to evaluate motor development in infants and young children:
1) The Harris Infant Neurodevelopment Test (HINT) assesses motor behavior, behavioral state, and parent concerns in infants 2.5-12.5 months through observation. Higher scores indicate less mature development.
2) The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) evaluates gross motor performance in infants from birth to independent walking through 58 items organized by position. Higher percentiles suggest less likely delay.
3) The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) assesses motor skills in children from birth to 6 years through tasks evaluating grasping, visual-motor integration, and object manipulation
The document discusses several pediatric assessment tools used to evaluate motor development in infants and young children:
1) The Harris Infant Neurodevelopment Test (HINT) assesses motor behavior, behavioral state, and parent concerns in infants 2.5-12.5 months through observation. Higher scores indicate less mature development.
2) The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) evaluates gross motor performance in infants from birth to independent walking through 58 items organized by position. Higher percentiles suggest less likely delay.
3) The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) assesses motor skills in children from birth to 6 years through tasks evaluating grasping, visual-motor integration, and object manipulation
The document discusses several pediatric assessment tools used to evaluate motor development in infants and young children:
1) The Harris Infant Neurodevelopment Test (HINT) assesses motor behavior, behavioral state, and parent concerns in infants 2.5-12.5 months through observation. Higher scores indicate less mature development.
2) The Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) evaluates gross motor performance in infants from birth to independent walking through 58 items organized by position. Higher percentiles suggest less likely delay.
3) The Peabody Developmental Motor Scales (PDMS-2) assesses motor skills in children from birth to 6 years through tasks evaluating grasping, visual-motor integration, and object manipulation
SUBJECT: PEDIA PT o Section 4 Tester’s clinical impression of the HARRIS INFANT NEUROMOTOR infant’s development TEST (HINT) Administration: o 15 to 30 minutes Target Population: 2.5 to 12.5 o Infant handling is minimal; months of age Early screening tool for potential primarily observational developmental disorders in both Scoring: high and low risk infants o Total scores are derived from Higher risk for developmental delay a sum of all scores for each of = referred for more extensive of the 21 motor behavior items motor delay Interpretation Measures: o Lower HINT total scores = o Infant motor behavior more mature o Behavioral state o Higher HINT total scores = o Head circumference less desirable o Parent/caregiver concerns TEST OF INFANT MOTOR about the infant’s PERFORMANCE (TIMPS) development To assess posture and movement of Type: Norm-referenced neuromotor, cognitive, behavioral screening tool infants from 34 weeks postmenstrual age through 4 Content: Four sections: months corrected age o Section 1 For use with infants in intensive care Infant’s background nurseries (NICU), developmental info follow-up clinics, and early o Section 2 intervention programs Five (5) questions Observed scale of 13 dichotomously assessing caregiver’s scored items used to examine an perception of the infant’s spontaneous movements infant’s movement An elicited scale of 29 items tests the and play infant’s movement responses to o Section 3 various position, sights, and sounds Twenty-one (21) According to the test authors, the items assessing the processes tested by the items include infant’s motor skills the following: in five positions, o The ability to orient and muscle tone, stabilize the head in space and in response to auditory and visual stimulation in It was developed to incorporate supine, prone, side-lying, and components of motor development, upright positions and during which are deemed essential to the transitions from one position evaluation and treatment of at-risk to another infants. o Body alignment when the Sequential development of postural head is manipulated control relative to four postural o Distal selective control of the positions: supine, prone, sitting, and fingers, wrists, hands, and standing is assessed through ankles observation. o Antigravity control of arm The test includes 58 items organized and leg movements into four positions: Administration: 25 to 40 minutes o prone, supine, sitting, and (depending of the child’s abilities, standing. behavioral state, physiologic, The distribution of these items is as stability, and level of cooperation) follows: 21 prone, 9 supine, 12 Scoring: 1 present 0 absent sitting, and 16 standing. o Elicited items are For each item, certain key administered according to descriptors are identified that must standardized instructions and be observed for the infant to pass the involve direct handling of the items. infant. Responses to these Each item describes three aspects of items are scored on a 3-, 4-, motor performance: 5-, or 6-point rating scales o weight-bearing that describe specific o Posture behaviors to be noted, o antigravity movements ranging from less mature or Administration minimal response to mature o Minimal handling or full response, as defined o Observed and not observed individually for each test Interpretation item. o The higher the percentile o Total raw scores range from 0 ranking, the less likely the to 142. infant is demonstrating a ALBERTA INFANT MOTOR SCALE delay in motor development. (AIMS) GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION Assessment of gross motor MEASURE (GMFM) performance Clinical measure designed to Infants from term (40 weeks after evaluate change in gross motor conception) through the age of function in children with Cerebral independent walking (0 to 18 Palsy months of age). 5 months to 16 years old. is appropriate for children whose o Object Manipulation (12 motor skills are at or below those of months and older) a 5-year-old child without any motor The Fine Motor Scale contains 98 disability. items divided into two subtests: The test includes 88 items that assess o Grasping (all ages) motor function in 5 dimensions o Visual-Motor Integration (all o (1) lying and rolling; ages) o (2) sitting; Administration o (3) crawling and kneeling; o 45 to 60 minutes o (4) standing; o Scored as 0, 1, or 2 o (5) walking, running, and 0 = The child cannot jumping. or will not attempt the the test measures whether a child can item, or the attempt complete the task independently. does not show that the Administration/Scoring skill is emerging. o 0 = Does not Initiate 1 = The child’s o 1 = Initiates (<10% of the performance shows a task) clear resemblance to o 2 = partially completes the the item mastery task (10 to <100% of the criteria but does not task) fully meet the criteria. o 3 = task completion (This value allows for emerging skills.) o GMFM-88 is 45 to 60 2 = The child minutes performs the item PEABODY DEVELOPMENTAL according to the MOTOR SCALES – SECOND EDITION criteria specified for (PDMS-2) mastery. It was designed to assess motor skills BRUININKS-OSERETSKY TEST OF in children from birth through 6 MOTOR PROFICIENCY – 2ND ED years of age. Ages 4 through 21 The PDMS-2 is divided into two designed to assess: components: o gross and fine motor o the Gross Motor Scale functioning in children o the Fine Motor Scale o for diagnosis of motor Gross Motor Scale contains 151 impairments items divided into four subtests: o screen for motor deficits o Reflexes (birth to 11 months) o assist in educational o Stationary (all ages), placement decisions, and can o Locomotion (all ages) be used as a means for planning and evaluating various motor development Greenspan Social- curricula Emotional Growth four motor-area composites Chart: A Screening o Fine Manual Control Questionnaire for o Manual Coordination Infants and Young o Body Coordination Children o Strength and Agility o Adaptive. Administration adaptive skill o 40 to 60 minutes; with an functioning in daily life based on Adaptive extra 10 minutes needed to Behavior Assessment prepare the testing area. System, Second o Two short testing sessions Edition are recommended for young 1 month and 42 months of age. children. Administration BAYLEY SCALES OF INFANT AND o For children aged 12 months TODDLER DEVELOPMENT – 3RD ED and younger, administration time is approximately 50 identify children with developmental minutes for the entire battery delay and provide information for o For children 13 months and intervention planning. older, the total administration assesses infant and toddler time is 90 minutes development across five domains: o Based on an age-specific start o Cognitive point, the child must receive sensorimotor a score of 1 on the first three development, consecutive items to move exploration and forward (basal level). If the manipulation, object child scores a 0 on the first relatedness, concept age-specific item, the formation, memory, examiner goes to previous and other aspects of age-specific item and applies cognitive functioning the same rule. The test is o Language discontinued for the receptive and particular scale when the expressive child receives scores of 0 for communication five consecutive items o Motor (ceiling level). fine motor and gross motor skills BATTELLE DEVELOPMENTAL o Social-Emotional INVENTORY – 2ND ED social and emotional used to measure development in milestones in children children with and without based on the disabilities to screen for children at risk for units within a given developmental delay activity. The BDI-2 measures development in o Caregiver Assistance five domains: measure disability of o Adaptive children with respect o Personal-Social to the amount of help o Communication they need to carry out o Motor functional activities. o Cognitive. The BDI-2 is appropriate for children from birth to 7 years, 11 months. o Modifications. Administration provides a frequency o The BDI-2 contains three count of the type and extent of administration procedures: environmental structured test, observation, modifications the and parent interview. child depends on to o The complete BDI-2 can be support functional administered in 60 to 90 performance. minutes, and 10 to 30 minutes for the Screening Test. PEDIATRIC EVALUATION OF DISABILITY INVENTORY measures both the in three content domains: FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE o (1) self-care MEASURE FOR CHILDREN o (2) mobility The Functional Independence o (3) social function Measure for Children (WeeFIM) is Functional performance is measured the pediatric adaptation of the by the level of caregiver assistance Functional Independence Measure and environmental modifications (FIM) for adults of the Uniform Data needed to accomplish major System for Medical Rehabilitation. functional activities. help monitor children with The content areas of self-care, disabilities as they grow into adults mobility, and social function are who function at a maximum level of assessed through three sets of independence measurement scales: The WeeFIM-II system includes the o Functional Skills WeeFIM instrument, the WeeFIM designed to reflect instrument 0–3 Module, and an meaningful functional Internet-based software application with a report generator and quarterly aggregate reports The latest revision of the WeeFIM consists of 18 items within three domains: o Self-care (8 ITEMS) o Mobility (5 ITEMS) o Cognition (5 ITEMS) designed for use with children between the ages of 6 months and 7 years, (but may be used with older children with developmental disabilities and mental ages less than SCHOOL FUNCTION ASSESSMENT 7 years.) The WeeFIM is a measure of response to the need for an effective disability, not impairment, and is functional performance measure for intended to measure what a child children attending elementary with a disability actually does, not school. what they ought to be able to do or A reliable and valid assessment tool might be able to do if circumstances specific to the student’s needs and were different. abilities and performance within the Administration/Scoring school environment is necessary for o direct observation of the child effective evaluation and service o assessments may be planning. completed by interviewing Kindergarten through Grade 6. parents or caregivers who are The SFA consists of three sections: familiar with the child’s o Participation everyday activities. general or special o Each of the 18 items to education classrooms assess the child’s function is Playground rated on a seven-level ordinal transportation to/ scale, from (1) total from school dependence to (7) complete Bathroom independence. transitions to/from class mealtimes. o Task Supports Physical Task Support Assistance Physical Task Support Adaptations Cognitive/Behavioral 7, 8 to 12, and 13 to 18 years of Task Support– age. Assistance The Peds-QL contains a pediatric and self-report for children 5 to 18 Cognitive/Behavioral years and a parent proxy report Task Support– for children 2 to 18 years. Adaptations. The Peds-QL contains four o Activity Performance. multidimensional scales: Physical Tasks o (1) Physical Functioning (8 Cognitive/Behavioral items) Tasks o (2) Emotional Functioning (5 items) o Activity Performance section o (3) Social Functioning (5 is used in measuring items) performance in school-related o (4) School Functioning (5 functional activities such as items) following school rules, using And provides three summary scores: school materials, and o (1) Total Scale Score (23 communicating needs. items) PEDIATRIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE o (2) Physical Health INVENTORY Summary Score (8 items) o (3) Psychosocial designed to measure health- related Health Summary Score (15 quality of life in healthy children items) and adolescents and those with acute and chronic illnesses. PEDIATRIC OUTCOMES DATA- 23-item Peds-Q Generic Core Scales COLLECTION INSTRUMENT measure core dimensions of health as comprehensive measure of delineated by the World Health musculo-skeletal outcomes Organization, as well as school associated with pediatric orthopedic functioning. problems. The Peds-QL Generic Core Scales is It was created to measure outcomes a multidimensional questionnaire, that orthopedic treatment could measuring health-related quality of affect: life pertaining to: o upper and lower extremity o Physical motor skills o Emotional o relief of pain o Social o restoration of activity. o school functioning The PODCI consists of: Developmentally appropriate forms o an Adolescent Self-Report are available for children 2 to 4, 5 to Outcomes Questionnaire o an Adolescent Parent-Report scales (ranging from 1 to 4, 5, Outcomes Questionnaire or 6). o and a Pediatric Outcomes Questionnaire The Pediatric Outcomes Questionnaire is intended to be used for children 2 to 10 years through parent report; the Adolescent Parent- Report Questionnaire is intended for use in children between 11 and 18 years; and the Adolescent Self-Report Questionnaire is intended for youth and children 11 to 18 years who can complete the form independently. The Pediatric Outcomes Questionnaire consists of 8 scales: o Upper Extremity and Physical Function Scale o Transfer and Basic Mobility Scale o Sports/Physical Functioning Scale o Pain/Comfort Scale o Treatment Expectations Scale o Happiness Scale o Satisfaction with Symptoms Scale o Global Functioning Scale. The questionnaire contains 86 questions. Administration o The Pediatric Outcomes Questionnaire is completed by a parent/guardian who has knowledge of the child’s condition with approximate completion time of 10 to 20 minutes. Responses to questions are rated on various