Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Forest Law Final22
Forest Law Final22
ASSESSMENT OF IMPLANTATION
AND COMMUNITY AWARENESS
OF RA 9147 WILDLIFE RESOURCES
CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION ACT
IN BARANGAY CARROMATA
SAN MIGUEL SURIGAO DEL SUR
A RESEARCH PAPER
In
FOREST LAWS
Submitted to the Department of FORESTRY
NORTH EASTERN MINDANAO STATE UNIVERSITY
San Miguel Campus
MELEBOY O. ROSARIO
SHILLA U. SANDAYA
BRYAN ALIMBOYONG
RUTCHIL A. JACOBE
JINGKY D. SARIN
CATRINA B. UMBA
JESSA MAE JACOBE
MARY ROSE LOPIO
ZEM TRIPOLI
EMELDA ARADO
ANGELU MARTINEZ
APRIL 2023
INTRODUCTION
Republic Act no. 9147 of the Philippine is entitled “Wildlife Resources
Conservation and Protection Act” and it is the policy of the State to conserve the
country’s wildlife resources and their habitats for sustainability. It is crafted and
passed by the Congress of the Philippines and approved by the President of the
Philippines to conserve and Protect wildlife species and their habitats to promote
ecological balance and enhance biological diversity, to regulate the collection and
trade of Wildlife, to pursue the Philippine commitment to International conventions,
protection of wildlife and their habitats, and to initiate and support scientific studies,
on the Conservation of biological diversity.
The Philippine Wildlife has a significant number of plant and animal species
that are indigenous in the Philippines. The country's surrounding waters reportedly
have the highest level of biodiversity in the world. The Philippines is considered as
one of the seventeen mega diverse countries as well as global biodiversity hotspot.
The world's second largest archipelago country after Indonesia, the Philippines
includes more than 7,100 islands covering 297,179 km2 in the westernmost Pacific
Ocean. The country is one of the few nations that, in its entirety, both a hotspot and
a mega diversity country, placing it among the top priority hot-spots for global
conservation. But deprivation of the forests due to illegal logging, slash-and-burn
farming, and urbanization is stripping the Philippine animals of their natural habitats
and sanctuaries. Hundreds of years ago, most of the Philippine islands were covered
in rain forest. Deforestation, hunting, and a lack of wildlife management has led to
the Philippines being described as conservation “hotspot”. Fewer natural wildlife
habitat areas remain each year. Moreover, the habitat that remains has often been
degraded to the wild areas which existed in the past.
The country’s wildlife is listed as endangered, critically endangered or facing
extinction. Fragile as they are, these wonderful creatures need support in the
conservation effort for the environment to ensure that they will co-exist with us
humans. Wildlife conservation efforts are aimed in several main areas. These
include the creation of nature sanctuaries where wildlife can live protected and free
from harm, and where scientific studies can be conducted to better understand the
threats to various species and what solutions are needed to ensure their survival.
Researchers conducted this research about RA 9147 Philippine wildlife
Conservation Act, because we want to spread awareness of the Wild species, wild
animals to the Community particular in Carromata to protect them and ensure that
nature will be around for future generations to enjoy and to recognize the importance
of wildlife and wilderness lands to humans and to Community. Many government
agencies are dedicated to wildlife conservation, which help to implement policies
designed for wildlife protection. There are also numerous independent non-
governmental organizations who also promote various wildlife protection causes.
Researchers are also concerned because wildlife conservation has become an
increasingly important practice due to negative human activities on wildlife. Why
wildlife conservation is important? Aside from the fact losing the beauty of our
country, Philippines, and destroying different creatures, it is important in order to
preserve the diversity of biological life upon our country.
Objectives
This study aims to obtain the following;
1. To conserve and protect wildlife species and their habitats to promote ecological
balance and enhance biological diversity in community
2. To regulate the collection and trade of wildlife; Illegal activities and to aware the
Community in Carromata, regarding this Republic Act.
3. To evaluate, the awareness of the Community regarding of the Law RA 9147
also known as “Wildlife Conservation Act”.
4. To gather information and Data from people of Community especially the
Indigenous peoples to know the current situations of Wildlife species, Critically
endangered and endangered species in the Barangay.
This chapter presents various foreign and local materials associated with the
subject of this research. These materials aid in the comprehension and analysis of
the Effectiveness of Efforts that being taken to protect the Wildlife in the Philippines.
State of the Art The literature and studies that were reviewed were found to have
bearing on the present study. They served as bases for the conceptualization the
study’s research problem, research design and research methodology.
Local Literature
Roberto V. Oliva, a Forest Law Enforcement Specialist, stated that the
Philippines is one of the 17 mega diverse countries in the world in his book entitled,
PHILIPPINE FOREST AND WILDLIFE LAW ENFORCEMENT: Situational and Core
Issues. In this book, Oliva describe that the number of species in a country is one
measure of biodiversity. The Philippines has 204 species of mammals, of which 54%
or 111 species are found nowhere else; 101 species of amphibians, 78% of which is
endemic; 258 species of reptiles with 66% endemism; and 576 species of birds with
34% or 195 endemic species. On wild flora, the country has about 14,000 species
representing five percent of the world’s flora. These include more than 8,000 species
of flowering plants or angiosperms, 33 species of gymnosperms, 1,100 species of
pteridophytes, and 1,271 species of bryophytes.
According to Oliva, there are many more species that remain unknown to
science. Per hectare, the Philippines probably holds more diversity of life than any
other country on Earth. He explained that because of the remarkable diversity in
Philippine biological resources, the country is considered as one of the 18 mega
diversity countries in the world. Unfortunately, with the loss of the country’s forest
cover, the habitat of wild fauna has likewise been lost. In his piece of writing he
stated that habitat destruction can be attributed to logging, both legal and illegal,
mining and energy projects, land use conversion, kaingin, pest and diseases. While
habitat destruction is considered as the reason for wildlife loss, other factors include
weak institutional and legal mechanisms, domestication and hybridization,
introduction of exotic species, and over-exploitation for food and trade. In line with
this situation, Oliva also discussed in his book that the government is the responsible
for terrestrial and wildlife protection.
The government implemented the REPUBLIC ACT NO. 9147, the Wildlife
Resources Conservation and Protection Act. on July 30, 2001. In the pursuit of this
policy, this Act shall have the following objectives: (a) to conserve and protect wildlife
species and their habitats to promote ecological balance and enhance biological
diversity; (b) to regulate the collection and trade of wildlife; (c) to pursue, with due
regard to the national interest, the Philippine commitment to international
conventions, protection of wildlife and their habitats; and (d) to initiate or support
scientific studies on the conservation of biological diversity.
The country has 529 endemic vertebrates (DENR-PAWB et. al. 2002) for
which many of the endemic mammals and avia faunas are in endanger of extinction
if the current crisis continues. Heaney (1999) asserted that “it is tragic that the
biodiversity of the Philippines and the threat of its impending loss have been
discovered simultaneously”. Due to this scenario, Heaney (1999) concluded that the
nation is facing stark alternative: either a decline from the biologically richest place
on earth to environmental devastation, or recover from the current brush with
disaster to a point of stability. The decline of the Philippine forest is primarily due to
the Philippine government failure to implement protective policies and the corruption
of former administrations.
This is especially true on the latter half of last century where the forest
declined from 50% in 1950 to less than 20% at present, of which less than 3% is
primary forest left. As the publication of the Philippine spotted dear it states that by
the self-funded nationwide survey of Roger C. Cox, 95% of its natural distribution in
1985 and 1987 is believed to have kick started the present intense conservation
action is the Philippines.
International Trade in Endangered Species of wild fauna and flora (CITES). PAWB
has 4 divisions: Biodiversity management, Natural recreation and extension,
protected areas commission, and Wildlife resources. DENR in 1989 established the
sustainable development concept as its central guiding principle.
The department also formulated the Philippine Strategy for Sustainable
Development (PSSD) that incorporated the concept of the Triple Bottom Lines (i.e.
economic viability, ecological sustainability and social responsibility) as its central
them Related Studies According to Ceferino P. MAALA a visiting professor in
Hiroshima University-Japan, the Philippine is high on the list of priority countries in
the world for wildlife conservation because of its remarkable biological diversity,
large number of endemic animal and plant species, inadequate wildlife protection
measures, and high rate of deforestation What are endangered species?
According to the definition given by the International Union for the
Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN), endangered species are
plants or animals that are being threatened with extinction due to excessive hunting
and large scale destruction of their habitat. Conservationists all over the world are
alarmed by the 1996 Report of the International Union for IUCN taking that the
number of critically endangered mammals in the world has increased significantly
from 169-180, primates from 13-19, fresh water turtles from 10-24, and birds from
168-182. Of the list for endangered mammalian species, nine are endemic to the
Philippine islands.
These are the Golden crowned flying fox, Negros naked-backed fruit bat,
Philippine tube-nosed fruit bat, Panay bushy-tailed cloud rat, in hairy-tailed cloud rat,
Visayan warty pig, Calamian hog deer, Visayan spotted deer, and tamaraw. Among
the critically endangered avian species in the report is the Philippine eagle. Although
no endangered marine mammals were mentioned in the report, whale sharks are
fast disappearing from Philippine waters (Esplanada, 2000). For example, the
Rhicodon typus (also known as pating patola in Zambales, toko in Mindoro, balilan in
Cebu and Bohol and butanding in Bicol and Palawan), which regularly visits the
waters of Donsol, Sorsogon (located at the tip of Bicol Peninsula) from November to
May are rarely sighted in Philippine waters now.
These gentle, polka dotted whale sharks are widely hunted by local fishermen
for its meat and fins, which are reported to command a high price abroad. To prevent
the Richodon typus from completely disappearing from the Philippine waters, the
Philippine government in 1998 declared the whale shark endangered; thus, banning
poaching and exporting of its 2 Ceferino P. MAALA meat, which is a delicacy in
some Asian countries. Other nongovernmental conservation groups such as the
World Wildlife Fund Philippines (Kabang Kalikasan ng Pilipinas) and large business
conglomerates like Nokia Philippines, Megaworld Corporation and International
Container Terminal Services Incorporated have supported the government's
campaign to protect the whale shark.
The Philippine Daily Inquirer a leading Philippine newspaper also supports the
save the whale shark campaign. Other endangered Philippine species are the
Hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata), Olive Ridley turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea),
Leatherback turtle (Dermochyles coriacea), Philippine crocodile also known as
Philippine freshwater crocodile and Mindoro crocodile (Crocodylus mindorensis),
Indo-Pacific crocodile or salt water crocodile (Crocodylus porosus), Mindoro bleeding
heart (Gallicolumba platenae), Mindoro bleeding heart (Ducula mindorensis), lesser
eagle owl (Mimizuki gurneyi), Philippine eagle owl (Bubo philippensis), silvery
kingfisher (Alcedo argentata), Mindoro hornbill (Penelopides mindorensis), celestial
monarch (Hypothymis coelestis) and Isabela oriole (Oriolus isabellae).
Philippines that are implementing various ways to protect and conserve our
endangered wildlife. They are ensuring the health and survival of the habitats, plants
and animals, conserving natural areas, protecting vital ecosystem services and
providing communities with economically sustainable alternatives to forest
destruction. Through these organizations, they assess forestry and agricultural
businesses to ensure that they are complying with different environmental standards,
which include properly caring for water and soil, monitoring wildlife populations,
protecting migratory pathways and prohibiting the hunting and trafficking of wild
animals. Organizations help communities establish and support tourism businesses
as an alternative to deforestation. Therefore, the different organizations for wildlife
take an effort and takes active part in forming to protect the wildlife.
1. The awareness of the Community about the Republic Act 9167 or Philippine
Wildlife Conservation Act, according to the result that was gathered, Majority
of the people in community are already aware of the Law regarding to
preserving and Protecting wildlife species from illegal hunting and Human
activities especially in their locality, were answered by the head of the
households that are Indigenous peoples living for many years in community.
3. The important reason of protecting the wildlife is to save its small population
and to save them from extinction.
4. Some threatened species are can be found in some of the areas of San
Miguel particularly found in Upper areas of Carromata, Upper Brgy.
Calatngan, Sitio. Lamesa, Bagyang, Bitaugan, Lamesa and Bato, other
Endagered species and endemic species found in Lower San Miguel.
5. There were only about one to two animals that are being rescued every day.
These animals are not really endangered. Usually, animals like snakes,
turtles and monkeys are being turned over by those who don’t know how to
handle these animals according to DENR.
6. There’s a circumstance that the rescuer is being harmed by the animals that
they’re rescuing. Especially when those animals are not used to human
activity. Accidents are inevitable in rescuing wildlife animal.
8. Medical health plans are provided for all the animals. Quarantine tests and
annual health assessments are also given for all the animals that they are
taking care of.
10. There are many regional rescue centers all over the country. It is required to
have at least one rescue center/sanctuary for the animals every region.
According to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the
Philippine flora has 101 critically endangered species, 193 endangered
species and 240 vulnerable species. In the other hand, the Philippine fauna
has 299 resident species, 203 migrant species, 421 endemic species, 22
indigenous species, and 7 newly introduced species.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
32 Years
28 Years
22 Years
20 Years
18 Years
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Based on the survey result, that the researchers was gathered, we first survey
the residents of purok-4 Carromata, a total of 15 households heads were
interviewed about how long they currently living in the Community, the number of
years in residence community shows that 1 of the respondent answers 18 years old
living in the community, another household heads were interviewed, 2 respondents
of the households are 19 years old living in the Barangay, 1 of them is 20 years old
currently living and 1 were 21 years old in residence in barangay and 2 households
23 years old been living, 2 household lived 28 years.1 household residence for 30
years, 1 were 32 years living and 1 were 43 years still living in Barangay 40 years
still living in barangay and the last 1 respondents still living for 45 years in the
barangay
Respondents Answer
12
Based on the
Axis Title
3
Republic Act 9147
Wildlife YES NO
Conservation Act, according to the result that was gathered, Majority of the people
in community are already aware of the Law regarding to preserving and Protecting
wildlife species from illegal hunting and Human activities especially in their locality, a
total of 12 household heads were interviewed which is Indigenous peoples or
Lumad’s. A total of 15 peoples were interviewed and 3 of the heads of the Family
are not aware of RA 9147 or Wildlife Conservation Act, according to them they are
known of preserving and protecting wildlife species in their local area but they don’t
know about the Law of RA 9147 particular to the violations to illegal hunting of
wildlife species.
10
6 Number of species
Endangered Species
4 Critically Endangered
endemic species
2
0 1 1
a" ck ig g" il l li gi er
i t" ko e l " "
Us Du yP an rb Ku rs ve Tu irr og
" e rt b rn
Ta Ci u a b
er in a Gi ho al
m
"S
q "K
De l i pp n
W
or" o ro
"P is k ur
ne i ya
pi Ph sa ar in
d il u g Le
m
Vi Li z M Ku
li ip r M
i ng
Ph ito Fy
on
M
Based on the survey result, to the survey question, what are those
Endangered Species in your area, particular in Carromata, chart show the number
of results.
According to the respondents which are Indigenous peoples and lived for many
years in Locality and encounter wild animals’ in their farm if these wild animals are
still seen today,
According to Tatay Concordio, Linaban one of the Indigent we interview, age
67 years old and 50 years living in Community, these wild animals are still seen in
Carromata area, Philippine monkey, wild chicken or “Manok ihalas” “Babuy ramu”
Kalaw, kuligi, Milo, “Gibang” or monitor lizard, Philippine Duck or “Pato de ramal”
Kagwang or Kabog, katudo, kugsik or squirrel, sayaw and tuko and Kabog,
/according to Tatay Concordio, some of main problem of these endangered species
that are now become extinct Nowadays are affected by human activities, like
collection, possession, illegal hunting, animal poaching, local transportation of
wildlife and some are affected by Natural Disasters Changing Climate that are
greatly reason for their habitat loss and rapid extinct of threatened species .
Yes No
Based on the survey results, According to their answers in chart, They have
still seen those mentioned Endangered wild animals in their area, according to the 8
respondents which are Indigenous peoples and lived for many years in Locality and
encounter wild animals’ in their farm and these wild animals are still seen today,
such as; Mindoro Hornbill, Ibid, Banug, Flying Lemur or “Kagwang” Lizard or
Gibang, Philippine Monkey, Kuligi, Philippine eagle owl or known in Manobo as
“Ukang” Limokon, ”Tigkos”, Monitor lizard, squirrel or “kugsik” “Kuwago” but a great
number of them are now Critically-endangered species, according to 7 respondents
which are Indigenous peoples such as; Visayan warti pig or known as local name
“Babuy ramu” Philippine deer “Usa” Wild chicken, “manok ihalas” Palawan
Binturong or known in manobo local name as “Katudo” Palm Civet or “Milu” Tuko,
Philippine tarsier and “kalaw” and “kuyago” which are now extremely rare due to
human Activities and Hunting.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
What are the possible issues, Problems of Rapid extinction of widlife species Today?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Based on the survey results, Result shows that Preserving and Protecting
Wildlife, avoid Illegal Human Activities and Maintain Ecological Balance gained both
the same answer by the respondents.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Conclusions From the analysis, interpretations and implications of the findings of the
study,
the following conclusions were drawn:
1. The Community in carromata are aware about preserving and protecting wild
animals through proper maintaining the wildlife’s biodiversity balance by preventing
human activities, killing and hunting wildlife it will maintain ecological balance to the
wildlife.
2. There were many different organizations, different in objectives and efforts. But
still they are striving for one goal, to take good care, protect and preserve the
natural resources that our countries can be proud of.
3. Protecting wildlife is to encompass plants and animals. Protecting wildlife will also
protect the habitats and therefore help maintain ecological balance.
4. Continue conserving Biodiversity and proper utilizing of forestland and preventing
from negative activities to the wildlife should be the advocacy of the people lived in
Community.
Recommendations
In the light of the findings and conclusions, the following are offered as
recommendations for possible action:
1. The government should develop and enhance the laws concerning the
protection of country’s natural resources.
2. The Government should conduct training, awareness to the Community to
become knowledgeable about Conserving and supporting wildlife.
2. Increased support from state and central government agencies for the
conservation of natural resources.
3. Proper planning of land and water utilization should be done to ensure the
protection of wildlife in their natural habitats or in their natural habitats in the
Forestlands.
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
APPENDIX FIGURE
1. Are you aware of Republic Act 9147 Conserving and Protecting Wildlife species in your
Community?
6. What are the possible Issues, Problems of Rapid Extinction of wildlife species Today?
7. Is there Organizations in your Community that protects and Preserve natural resources?
10. How will you Contribute to protect our wildlife to save its small population and to save
them from rapid extinction?
DATA GATHERING
Appendix Figure 1. Data Gathering at P-4 Barangay Carromata, San Miguel, Surigao del Sur.
DATA GATHERING
Appendix Figure 2. Data Gathering at P-3 Barangay Carromata, San Miguel, Surigao del Sur.
DATA GATHERING
Appendix Figure 3. Data Gathering at P-1, Barangay Carromata, San Miguel, Surigao del Sur.
REFERENCES
Republic Act No. 9147 | Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines