Composing Through
Distraction
Yes, I Really Write
This Way
eaRiewe
ce experienced writers analysis and reflection on her initial composing
processes when faced with high-stakes writing tasks.RENAN, COMPOSING THROUGH OSE
=_— nn THROUGH OST
What You Need to Know 2
‘What | want to share in this piece is a sense of hope for all writers, like
myself, who struggle to write a first draft when the stakes are high. Once
{have a decent draft, | /ove the work of revision, but getting to that point
isa struggle. High-stakes writing is hard for me, and by high stakes | basi-
cally mean anything that is going to an audience | respect and want to
impress. Bottom line: | don’t want to look stupid, While I can write pretty
effortlessly in my journal, shoot off necessary work emails, compose let
ters to friends, and text ‘til the cows come home, high-stakes writing is
another matter altogether. resist it, avoid it, and have developed a whole
host of ways to thwart my awn progress. While know thatthe discomfort
‘of composing is ultimately outweighed by the eventual reward of a com-
pleted piece, that sentiment is hard to conjure while I'm in the thick of
resistance. What | hope to capture here is a snapshot of what go through
as | begin a project.
Driving Myself to Distraction
When writing gets hard, | make it harder by abandoning it. My brain will
do just about anything else but want to write. To give you an idea of just
how extensively I distract myself while trying to write, here isa list of
tasks | have done during a few recent writing sessions—sometimes even
inthe middle of composing a sentence:
1 Initiated a texting spree with a friend (topic completely unrelated to
What | was writing about)
1 Cleaned out the inbox of my work email
1 Searched online for Frye pocketbooks
1 Started working on a different piece of writing
1 Found a bottle of hand sanitizer and atissue and meticulously cleaned
my computer keyboard
‘tea snack
‘Ate another snack
Wrote an email
Visited several websites totally unrelated to what | was writing about
(Amazon, the University bookstore, 1-800-CalculatorsforSchools.com)
Deposited a check electronically into my account
Called the bookstore to ask if they had graphing calculators
Looked at instagram
Contemplated going out to buy a cookie
Cleaned out my personal email inbox
Ran some numbers on yet a different project | was working on
Ran a word count on the document | was writing
Etemy process is inefficient and counterproductive at best. Each time I step
away from a piece of writing, even fora few minutes, | have to find my
‘way back into it. The most common way I do this is to re-read the piece
from the beginning, Is like gaining momentum to move forward or tak-
ing the marble to the top ofthe hill again to see if can get ito rol farther
than the last time. It works for me, and | find that in addition to re-reading
‘when I come back from ane of my “distractions” | also re-read when-
ever | finish a section of writing, whether that’s a paragraph or a larger
chunk of an idea that ve just worked through. Sometimes | read aloud
ot in a soft whisper. On occasion, | feel that what I've written is good,
and I can see my way forward to the next sentence. Frequently, | fee!
that what I've written is ridiculous and juvenile and embarrassing and
doesn't come near to expressing what | know | want to say. The paradox
kicker: | don't know what | want to say until I've written i, For me—and
[believe there's truth in this for many writers—meaning-making comes
about through writing itself | discover what | know and think as J write
and those revelations deepen and refine themselves as | revise. My writ.
ing seis not merely a transcriptionist who takes thoughts from my head
and transfers them to the screen (and I do compose almost exclusively
‘on a computer). The meaning comes through the act of writing itself
But no matter how much I know this to be tre intellectually, i's nea
impossible to remember in the moment of composing when I re-read my
first attempts and it all sounds ridiculous, n those instances | either just
stop in disgust and abandon the task forthe time being or say disparaging
remarks to my inner critic and keep writing in spite of what that part of
my brain is telling me.
| could continue, but| worrtbecause it's alte bitembarrassing. Clearly, z |
j
Clearly, the biggest challenge for me is just sticking with it. Staying on the
ppage—in the moment—is HARD. | am resisting the urge at this moment
to go check my email. Again. Or send a text. Again. Or do any of those
other things on the list of distractions. | don't usually win that fight when
the urge comes to move away from the writing at hand. | may hold out for
‘a minute or five, but eventually [will succumb. Why? Probably because
its easier to respond to something external like an email than it isto
invent/create/igure out what | want to say. Qr perhaps itis because mak-
ing a phone call or depositing a check is a concrete, immediate act that
{gives me a near instantaneous sense of accomplishment while the payoff
[get from writing is through various stages of delayed gratification. One
might argue that what | term “distraction” is really just a necessary part
cof my process. | would agree with that if any of these non-writing tasks
resulted in some “ah ha” moments for me, but they don't. They are truly
‘away to avoid thinking about what 'm supposed to be doing, What does
help generate thought and propel me forward are things like taking a
walk or cleaning the house, physical movement gets me out of my head
‘abit and allows new ideas or connections to rise tothe surface, but can
only use these tools once ! am well into a draft, not atthe beginning of
composing
|Tools for Combating Distraction %
‘What have | done to combat these less-than-ideal habits? Just this morning
I read a book titled How to Write a Lot: A Guide to Productive Academic
Writing (2007). its a short and very accessible book thats readable in one
sitting, From it, was reminded of several helpful habits to cultivate: have
schedule, develop a goal for each writing session, make a list
of writing projects, and keep track of progress. Nothing | don't already
know, but reading it did give me some inspiration to get back to this
draft and think about how | might be more disciplined with my writing
‘overall, And as a bonus, | was able to delay writing this draft by taking the
time to set up my own spreadsheet with the following categories: date,
‘word count, writing goal, writing project, and time spent. Since I set up
the spreadsheet, I've made four entries in it. Four. Over four months. So
‘much for cultivating the regular writing habit and keeping track of my
progress.
In attempts to help combat my resistance to sticking with a piece of writ-
ing, "ve tried various time-management tools like the Pomodoro method
where you work in short, timed blocks with small breaks in between. |
use an app for this, and have had great success with it when | choose to
employ it. The trouble is, even when | find an effective tool that helps
make me more productive, | don’t consistently use it (note the instance
‘of the spreadsheet above). Ill be diligent with something like Pomodoro
for a few days, maybe even a few weeks, but eventually I'l abandon
it; despite the evidence that a particular tool or process works for me.
‘Maybe you'd have more consistent success."
Ive also tried a similar app called Forest, which is based on the same
technique as Pomodoro. This app, however, aims to keep you off your
phone while the work sessions are running by not giving you credit inthe
form of tree growth if you move away from the app. Fores lets you grow
individual vital tres fr each session you successfully complete, hence
the “forest” you can work towards. (And yes, | know I could more easily
just put my phone in the other room—what?!—or turn it off or put it in
airplane mode or something, But I don't. | might need to text someone
in the middle of writing a sentence.) “Stay focused / Be present” is this
app’s advice. Yes. Agree. | should do that while writing (and most other
activities as well).
Real Accountability with Coauthors
‘A writing process relatively new to me is the collaborative writing
| recently undertook with a colleague. We co-wrote a chapter for an
edited collection, and it went something like this: We talked through
the ideas for our chapter, took notes in a shared document, and then
assigned each other a deadline and a task. We were to meet again in a
Tinie you can read abou howto o the Promodor method in “Pdtv 101:
1 Pier The Pama Technique” at Ulertackes(hehackercompritiy 10)
primerto te poreorecmniqie 1598992730,Le
-COMPOSNGYOL 1/2017 5
‘week or two with individual drafts of our respective sections. During this
subsequent meeting, we combined those two sections and collectively
wove them together. One of us would be at one computer typing, while
the other watched along on another computer. Being in the same physi-
cal space and being able to talk think, brainstorm, and rethink our vision
{or the piace was highly effective and interesting. We repeated this pro-
cess of collaboratively writing, writing independently, and bringing the
draft together over the course ofa few months until we fet it was ready
Once we got editorial comments back, we divided up who would tackle
each section, made our respective revisions, and then sat together again
to fine-tune it. This is not to say thatthe individual writing part was any
easier than usual for me. It was not, but | very much enjoyed the process
as a whole, and it has made me want to find other opportunities to use
this approach,
Distraction AND Procrastination
And... its three days later. The deadline for this submission is tomorrow.
(Well, it was when 1 wrote that last night. Now, this piece is due later
today.) Before I will be able to submit this piece, | need feedback from
trusted reader. Once | get that, I'l be able to respond to that readers
comments and revise and submit. Fortunately, | have a trusted reader
who is able to accommodate my last-minute request. ! would not con-
sider an important piece of writing “ready" until | revised it again based
‘on a reader's response. Reader comments are an integral part of my writ
ing process, and are the difference between an okay piece of writing
and what could become a really good composition, Here, for example,
's the piece of feedback that | got from one reader early in my process
(who also happens to be a friend) that allowed me to continue: “IW/hat
isthe so what? What do u want a reader to understand after reading your
piece? When u can answer that, then think about how u can plant litle
seedlings throughout so that you can make that happen.” Hearing this
gave me a chance to refocus and inspired me to write a new introduc.
tion, adding section headings to help guide me, and generally feeling lke
| could actually finish this piece.
Why | Need Readers
| need readers along the way. Desperately. They often help me see what
''m trying to do or, at the very least, make me remember that eventually
someone besides myself will read what 'm writing, which means that |
better figure out what itis! want to say. The trouble is that when | need
readers the most is when I'm leas thrilled about anyone looking at what
lve created, which is in the painful beginning period. Sharing my writing
makes me feel vulnerable. What I want every reader of my work to say,
always, is “This is terifc! What insight!” etc. But that never happens, nor.
should it, especially in an early draft. I seek readers as I write to help me,
and it would not be very helpful to be told my draft was “terrific” That
doesn’t mean my feelings aren‘ abit hurt when I'm told by my husband‘or my bestfriend or a trusted colleague that what I've got sill needs
‘work, It does, but I don't let my ego get in the way of making a piece
better. usually just grumble, say some unkind things in my head, and get
to work. The fun part of writing for me is this right here (draft #4, second
round of editorial reviews), and | can’t get to this place in the process if |
don't get the feedback | need along the way.
Some helpful feedback that 1 got on this chapter came from readers
‘chosen by this journal's editors, The readers didn’t know who wrote the
pieces they were asked to review. | knew that my first craft wasn't as on
topic as it needed it to be, but | wasr’t sure where to go with it. The draft
had a kernel of the current idea but | was too mired ina literature review
fd written recently for a grant application to be able to see far beyond
that project, so | just built upon ideas | had there, | was also up against
the submission deadline (shocking, | know) and could only write from
‘where I was. I didn’t have the time to write myself into new ideas. When
joural readers sent me feedback, | was told: “This section doesn't seem
Cohesive with the vision stated in the abstract. This reads more like a lit
review, which I'm not sure is necessary to get at the stated purpose." And
“Again, this section doesn't offer any insights into the struggle the author
purports to draw us into.” And, finally,
‘The idea of reflecting on how you developed your abilities to waite from
‘one situation to another seems promising. | am not sure how you will,
‘work inthis information on transfer in a way that maintains the stance
‘of one writer talking to another. Jn fac, | think twill not work taics
Iminel—though there may be a place fora note or two about the work
‘done on transfer. At this point, the outline looks like t would produce a
paper written fr teachers of writing rather than for writers. | would like
to see the reflective part of the paper.
Hove the claim, “in fact, [think it will not work.” Sometimes thats what
a writer needs to hear. First drafts for me are sometimes a way to clear
some headspace, think through some ideas, and figure out what | don’t
‘want to say. This draft has quite a different focus than the first, and I'm
glad readers were able to see that there was enough tension in that earlier
attemot that | didn’t really know yet what | was trying to make that pfece
of writing do. (Please note that during my search to find that feedback
| was waylaid by my email, which | selectively read and responded to
before coming back to this task)
The Payoff
Tou may think at this point that I detest high-stakes writing, To a degree,
this is true. So let me tell you why I keep doing it | enjoy the act of figur-
ing things out as | write. Its an experience and a way of thinking that
doesn’t happen for me when talking or when merely thinking, Writing is
knowledge making—and you can't really understand that until you expe-
rience itfor yourself. There is something infinitely satisfying about writing
Until your ideas come together, new insights arise, and some center of
First drafts for me
‘are sometimes
‘away to clear
some headspace,
think through
some ideas, and
figure out what |
don't want to say
J enjoy the act
of figuring things
cout as I write
3Ae cOWPOSINGVOL 1/2017
gravity takes hold as your thoughts coalesce around what you discover
write because you really want to convey. Its magical, which is why | suppose resistant
ithelps me make writers like myself continue to do it.
saree of What also allows me to continue writing, even when I think what I've
wore roduced is silly or not so smart, isa trust in my process. I 'm able to
Silence that inner critic and continue writing, | know that eventually —
after getting feedback, revising, geting more feedback, revising, rethinks
ing, ete. will find what | want to say and make meaning where there
vas none before I write because it helps me make sense ofthe world
Writing processes, like everything else about us as humans, are idio-
syneratc, | find its best to accept my predisposition to distraction and
procrastination while also cultivating whatever habits | can to get me
to the page. Once there, I'l undoubtedly find hundreds of ways to run
from it, but eventually I'll come back, roll my marble from the top of the
‘metaphorical hill and write another sentence.
References
silvia, PJ. (2007). How to write alot: A practical guide to produc-
tive academic writing. Washington, DC: American Psychological
‘Association
AA LL SG ain a aan
EWN csute pan cneretrs talon cy dary tach "ve
serrate Mabe ence bow tae ster one an fl
ans cbaeas Aiphone bem a se
tert sponte poeta oebuckem bt end vaned
Here iat nat havea hover vonsgr tc abd a
eae odbc ecbeioae patot poco