Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RC-I Chapter 1 PDF
RC-I Chapter 1 PDF
RC-I Chapter 1 PDF
1.1. INTRODUCTION
Traditionally, the study of reinforced concrete design begins directly with a chapter on materials,
followed by chapters dealing with design. In this material, a departure is made from that
convention. It is desirable for the student to have first an overview of the world of reinforced
concrete structures, before plunging into the finer details of the subject. Accordingly, this section
gives a general introduction to reinforced concrete and its applications. It also explains the role of
structural design in reinforced concrete construction, and outlines the various structural systems
that are commonly adopted in buildings.
That concrete is a common structural material is, no doubt, well known. But, how common it is,
and how much a part of our daily lives it plays, is perhaps not well known — or rather, not often
realized. Structural concrete is used extensively in the construction of various kinds of buildings,
stadia, auditoria, pavements, bridges, piers, breakwaters, berthing structures, dams, waterways,
pipes, water tanks, swimming pools, cooling towers, bunkers and silos, chimneys, communication
towers, tunnels, etc. It is the most commonly used construction material, consumed at a rate of
approximately one ton for every living human being. “Man consumes no material except water in
such tremendous quantities”.
1.2. PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE
Concrete may be remarkably strong in compression, but it is equally remarkably weak in tension
[Figure 1-1(a)]. Its tensile strength is approximately one-tenth of its compressive strength. Hence,
the use of plain concrete as a structural material is limited to situations where significant tensile
stresses and strains do not develop, as in hollow (or solid) block wall construction, small pedestals
and ‘mass concrete’ applications (in dams, etc.).
Concrete Steel
Strength in Tension Poor Good
Strength in Compression Good Good, but slender bars will buckle
Strength in Shear Fair Good
Durability Good Corrodes if unprotected
Fire resistance Good Poor, suffers rapid loss of strength at high temperature
It can be seen from this list that the materials are more or less compatible. The steel bars (embedded
in the tension zone of the concrete) compensate for the concrete’s incapacity for tensile resistance,
effectively taking up all the tension, without separating from the concrete [Figure 1-1(b)]. The
bond between steel and the surrounding concrete ensures strain compatibility, i.e., the strain at any
point in the steel is equal to that in the adjoining concrete. Moreover, the reinforcing steel imparts
ductility to a material that is otherwise brittle. In
practical terms, this implies that if a properly reinforced beam were to fail in tension, then such a
failure would, fortunately, be preceded by large deflections caused by the yielding of steel, thereby
giving ample warning of the impending collapse [Figure 1-1(c)].
Tensile stresses occur either directly, as in direct tension or flexural tension, or indirectly, as in
shear, which causes tension along diagonal planes (‘diagonal tension’). Temperature and shrinkage
effects may also induce tensile stresses. In all such cases, reinforcing steel is essential,and should
be appropriately located, in a direction that cuts across the principal tensile planes (i.e., across
potential tensile cracks). If insufficient steel is provided, cracks would develop and propagate, and
could possibly lead to failure.
Reinforcing steel can also supplement concrete in bearing compressive forces, as in columns
provided with longitudinal bars. These bars need to be confined by transverse steel ties [Figure 1-
1(d)], in order to maintain their positions and to prevent their lateral buckling. The lateral ties also
serve to confine the concrete, thereby enhancing its compression load-bearing capacity.
The development of reliable design and construction techniques has enabled the construction of a
wide variety of reinforced concrete structures all over the world: building frames (columns and
beams), floor and roof slabs, foundations, bridge decks and piers, retaining walls, grandstands,
water tanks, pipes, bunkers and silos, folded plates and shells, etc.
(b) Reinforced
concrete beam
supports loadswith
acceptably low
deformations
(d) Reinforced
concretecolumn
1. Economy.
2. Suitability of material for architectural and structural function.
3. Fire resistance.
4. Rigidity.
5. Low maintenance.
6. Availability of materials.
On the other hand, there are a number of factors that may cause one to select a material other
than reinforced concrete. These include:
1. Low tensile strength.
2. Forms and shoring.
1. Appropriateness.
2. Economy.
3. Structural adequacy.
4. Maintainability
2. They render the task of the designer relatively simple; often, the results of sophisticated
analyses are made available in the form of a simple formula or chart.
3. The codes ensure a measure of consistency among different designers.
4. They have some legal validity, in that they protect the structural designer from any
liability due to structural failures that are caused by inadequate supervision and/or faulty
material and construction.
The codes are not meant to serve as a substitute for basic understanding and engineering
judgment. The student is, therefore, forewarned that s/he will make a poor designer if s/he
succumbs to the unfortunate (and all-too-common) habit of blindly following the codes. On the
contrary, in order to improve her/his understanding, s/he must learn to question the code
provisions — as, indeed, s/he must, nearly everything in life!
Application rules are generally recognized rules which comply with the Principles and satisfy
their requirements. Alternative rules may be used provided that compliance with the
Principles can be demonstrated, however the resulting design cannot be claimed to be wholly in
accordance with the Eurocode although it will remain in accordance with Principles.
1.6. MATERIALS
If more than about 30 tests are available, the strengths will generally approximate a normal
distribution. The normal distribution curve, shown by the curved line in Figure 1-3, is symmetrical
about the mean value, x of the data. The dispersion of the data can be measured by the sample
standard deviation, S , which is the root-mean-square deviation of the strengths from their mean
value:
( 1-1)
The standard deviation divided by the mean value is called the coefficient of variation, V:
( 1-2)
This makes it possible to express the degree of dispersion on a fractional or percentage basis
rather than an absolute basis. The concrete test data in Figure 1-3 have a standard deviation of
615 psi and a coefficient of variation of or 15.6 percent. 615/3940 = 0.156.
If the data correspond to a normal distribution, their distribution can be predicted from the
properties of such a curve. Thus, 68.3 percent of the data will lie within 1 standard deviation above
or below the mean. Alternatively, 15.6 percent of the data will have values less than
x s , Similarly, for a normal distribution, 10 percent of the data, or 1 test in10, will have
Figure 1-4 shows the mean concrete strength, fcr, required for various values of the coefficient
of variation if no more than 1 test in 10 is to have strength less than 3000 psi. As shown in this
figure, as the coefficient of variation is reduced, the value of the mean strength, fcr, required to
Figure 1-4 - Normal frequency curves for coefficients of variation of10, 15, and 20 percent.
NB: Poor control .......................... V > 14%
Average control… ................ V = 10.5%
Excellent control ................... V < 7%
Chapter 1 – Introduction to Reinforced Concrete Page 9
ASTU Department of Civil Engineering Reinforced Concrete I
1.6.4. Stress-Strain Curves
Typical stress-strain curves of concrete (of various grades), obtained from standard uniaxial
compression tests, are shown in Figure 1-5. The curves are somewhat linear in the very initial
phase of loading; the non-linearity begins to gain significance when the stress level exceeds
about one-third to one-half of the maximum. The maximum stress is reached at a strain
approximately equal to 0.002; beyond this point, an increase in strain is accompanied by a decrease
in stress. For the usual range of concrete strengths, the strain at failure is in the range of 0.003 to
0.005.
The higher the concrete grade, the steeper is the initial portion of the stress-strain curve, the
sharper the peak of the curve, and the less the failure strain. For low-strength concrete, the curve
has a relatively flat top, and a high failure strain.
When the stress level reaches 70–90 percent of the maximum, internal cracks are initiated in the
mortar throughout the concrete mass, roughly parallel to the direction of the applied loading. The
concrete tends to expand laterally, and longitudinal cracks become visible when the lateral strain
(due to the Poisson effect) exceeds the limiting tensile strain of concrete (0.0001—0.0002).The
cracks generally occur at the aggregate-mortar interface. As a result of the associated larger lateral
extensions, the apparent Poisson’s ratio increases sharply.
1. Modulus of Elasticity
The Young’s modulus of elasticity is a constant, defined as the ratio, within the linear elastic range,
of axial stress to axial strain, under uniaxial loading. In the case of concrete under uniaxial
compression, it has some validity in the very initial portion of the stress-strain curve, which is
practically linear [Figure 6]; that is, when the loading is of low intensity, and of very short duration.
Various descriptions of Ec are possible, such as initial tangent modulus, tangent modulus (at a
specified stress level), secant modulus (at a specified stress level), etc. — as shown in Figure 6.
Among these, the secant modulus at a stress of about one-third the cube strength of concrete is
generally found acceptable in representing an average value of Ec under service load conditions
(static loading).
As pointed out earlier, concrete is very weak in tension, the direct tensile strength being only about
7 to 15 percent of the compressive strength. It is difficult to perform a direct tension test on a
concrete specimen, as it requires a purely axial tensile force to be applied, free of any
misalignment and secondary stress in the specimen at the grips of the testing machine. Hence,
indirect tension tests are resorted to, usually the flexure test or the cylinder splitting test.
From theory of elasticity concepts, the following formula for the evaluation of the splitting tensile
strength fct is obtained:
2P (1)
fct =
3.14dL
Where P is the maximum applied load, d is the diameter and L the length of the cylinder.