Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Taxnta4862 - TL105
Taxnta4862 - TL105
NTA4862/105/0/2023
TAX4862
NTA4862
Year module
CONTENTS
ORIENTATION ....................................................................................................................................5
I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 5
II. STUDY PROGRAMME AND TIME FRAME ............................................................................. 5
III. ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 6
IV. BEANCOUNTER SCENARIO .................................................................................................. 6
V. LECTURERS ........................................................................................................................... 6
VI. IMPORTANT DATE FOR THIS TUTORIAL LETTER .............................................................. 7
VII. ADDITIONAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................... 7
SECTION A .........................................................................................................................................8
DAYS 1 & 2 - WORK PLAN FOR 5 AND 6 APRIL 2023....................................................................... 8
LEARNING UNIT 7 – GENERAL DEDUCTIONS, SPECIAL DEDUCTIONS AND ASSESSED LOSSES
.................................................................................................................................................8
7.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 8
7.1.1 UNGC Principle 10 ................................................................................................................... 9
7.2 OUTCOMES OF THIS LEARNING UNIT ................................................................................. 9
7.3 BEANCOUNTER SCENARIO ................................................................................................ 10
7.4 CONTENT OF LEARNING UNIT ........................................................................................... 11
7.4.1 Study approach ...................................................................................................................... 11
7.4.2 Table of Reference ................................................................................................................. 12
Chapter 3 & 4..................................................................................................................................... 12
7.4.3 Paragraphs in SILKE which you may ignore ........................................................................... 15
7.5 IMPORTANT LAW AMENDMENTS ....................................................................................... 15
7.6 ADDITIONAL NOTES ON THE GENERAL DEDUCTION FORMULA, SPECIAL DEDUCTIONS
AND ASSESSED LOSSES .................................................................................................... 17
7.6.1 The general deduction formula (sections 11(a) and 23(g) and SILKE 6.3 and 6.5.7) .............. 17
7.6.2 Pre-trade expenditure and losses (section 11A and SILKE 6.2.1)........................................... 20
7.6.3 Prepaid expenditure (section 23H and SILKE 6.4) .................................................................. 21
7.6.4 Tax treatment of leases versus suspensive sale agreements ................................................. 22
7.7 OUTCOMES OF THE BEANCOUNTER SCENARIO ............................................................. 24
7.8 SUMMARY OF LEARNING UNIT 7 ....................................................................................... 24
7.9 LIST OF REFERENCES FOR LEARNING UNIT 7 ................................................................ 24
DAYS 3 & 4 – WORK PLAN FOR 7 TO 8 APRIL 2023 ...................................................................... 25
LEARNING UNIT 8 – CAPITAL ALLOWANCES AND RECOUPMENTS ........................................... 25
8.1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................... 25
8.1.1 UNGC principles 9 and 10 ...................................................................................................... 26
8.2 OUTCOMES OF THIS LEARNING UNIT ............................................................................... 26
8.3 BEANCOUNTER SCENARIO ................................................................................................ 27
3 TAX4862/105/2023
ORIENTATION
I. INTRODUCTION
This tutorial letter is divided into four learning units:
• Learning unit 7 deals with the general deduction formula, prohibitions, special deductions and
assessed losses.
• Learning unit 8 deals with capital allowances and recoupments.
• Learning unit 9 deals with trading stock and share transactions (section 9C).
• Learning unit 10 deals with interest-bearing instruments (section 24J), foreign exchange
differences (sections 24I and 25D), transfer pricing (section 31) and tax morality, strategy and
risk management (chapter 34 in SILKE).
The goal of this tutorial letter is to assist you in making the most of the time available to master the topics
in this tutorial letter. Follow the guidelines and keep to the allocated time (remember that the time
allocations are based on the assumption that certain topics have already been covered in your previous
studies).
We assume that you have 3 hours of study time on a weekday/night and 15 hours over a
weekend. We have based the work plan in this tutorial letter on this assumption. Full-time
students should adapt their study programme to full days.
6 TAX4862/105/2023
30 hours
III. ABBREVIATIONS
The list of abbreviations used in the tutorial letters is contained in TL102/2023. Please take note of the
following additional abbreviations relevant to this tutorial letter:
Abbreviation Meaning of abbreviation
CGT Capital Gains Tax
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
ITC Initial Test of Competence
V. LECTURERS
The following lecturers compiled this tutorial letter:
Ms IV Mkhomazi
Ms MM Pretorius
Please contact any of the tax lecturers, should you have questions about this tutorial letter. You may also
send your queries (regarding administrative and academic matters) and comments via e-mail to
TAX4862@unisa.ac.za (note that e-mail correspondence is the preferred method of communication –
refer to TL 101 in this regard).
For queries regarding administrative matters, please contact the administrative officer on
+27 12 429 2947. For queries regarding academic matters, you can contact any of the lecturers directly
or you can contact the administrative officer. The administrative officer will put you in touch with the
relevant lecturer on duty.
7 TAX4862/105/2023
Note that mainly the topics covered in this tutorial letter, together with the relevant case
law, will be assessed in test 2. Remember that all topics covered in previous tutorial letters
until now (for example VAT) can be incorporated in your assessment. Remember that the
test integrates topics to assess critical thinking.
PowerPoint slides that summarise the relevant study material in a specific tutorial letter.
Find pre-recorded lectures and recordings of live lectures on our YouTube channel –
UNISA - TAX CTA (PGDA)
(https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnSJpIUZeHNsRSYpyTR5_Dg)
As well as:
Note that many of the above resources are additional to the content of the tutorial letter and cannot be
used in isolation but must be used in conjunction with and in addition to your official study material, Student
Handbook and SILKE.
8 TAX4862/105/2023
SECTION A
DAYS 1 & 2 - WORK PLAN FOR 5 AND 6 APRIL 2023
LEARNING UNIT 7 – GENERAL DEDUCTIONS, SPECIAL DEDUCTIONS AND
ASSESSED LOSSES
A total of 6 hours (3 hours + 3 hours) of your study time this week has been allocated to LU 7.
Topic Minutes
General deduction formula, pre-trade expenditure and losses, prohibited
deductions, prepaid expenditure and prohibition against double deductions
180
Special deductions – employee-related expenses
Special deductions – other
Special deductions – section 24 debtors allowance
Special deductions - section 24C allowance in respect of future expenditure on
contracts 180
Assessed losses
Comprehensive example 12.23 in SILKE par 12.13
Total (6 hours) 360
The above time allocation is an indication only. The amount of time you need to spend on
each topic will be greatly influenced by the knowledge you already have from undergraduate
and previous postgraduate studies. You should therefore adapt the time allocation wherever
necessary to suit your level of prior knowledge.
7.1 BACKGROUND
In this learning unit you will study the general deduction formula, the prohibited deductions, as well as
those deductions which are not permitted in terms of the general deduction formula, but which are
contained in specific sections of the Income Tax Act (referred to as special deductions). You will also learn
about assessed losses.
9 TAX4862/105/2023
The topics covered in this learning unit fit into the tax framework as follows:
TAX FRAMEWORK
GROSS INCOME (s 1)
LESS: Exempt income (ss 10 and 10A to 10C)
= INCOME
LESS: Deductions and allowances (ss 11 – 24P, excluding s 20 and s 18A)
LESS: Assessed loss brought forward (s 20)
ADD: Amounts to be included in taxable income including TAXABLE CAPITAL GAINS
LESS: Deductions in terms of s 11
LESS: Qualifying donations (s 18A)
= TAXABLE INCOME
As you work through the tax legislation, you need to remember and apply ethical tax behaviour. In line with
the UNGC principles (introduced in TL102), compliance with the laws and regulations is the basis on which
the taxation legislation is founded.
UNGC principle 10 states that businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion
and bribery. The definition of corruption includes dishonest or fraudulent conduct; tax evasion would
therefore fall within the ambit of corruption. UNGC principle 10 encourages entities to find a balance
between the social obligation to pay taxes and tax planning, in order to minimise the ‘cost’ of these taxes
for an entity within the ambit of the law. Situations may arise where entities act with an intent to evade tax
(for example by claiming fraudulent deductions). It is thus important to take note of UNGC principle 10
when studying this unit, specifically as it relates to the requirements that need to be met before deductions,
which will decrease taxable income and thus taxes payable, can be claimed.
The most important outcome, however, is that you should be able to apply
your knowledge in practical case studies and in integrated questions (to
calculate and discuss) similar to those provided in sections B and C of this
tutorial letter by using critical thinking.
10 TAX4862/105/2023
Before you start studying the detailed provisions of deductions and assessed losses, read the
following scenario relating to the Beancounter family, and/or watch the cartoon posted under
Lessons on myUnisa. The scenario requires you to read through the information provided. As
you study the applicable sections in the Income Tax Act, identify areas of concern that should
be brought to the attention of the Beancounter family. Refer back to TL102/2023, TL103/2023
and TL104/2023 for background information on the Beancounter Family.
Bizzie Beancounter has decided to start her own business venture, which will be carried out in her own
name. She has located the perfect business premises, available for letting, where she intends to start a
dry-cleaning business (recognised by the Commissioner as a process similar to a process of manufacture).
Bizzie has decided to call her new business Bizzie-as-a-bee Cleaners.
Bizzie intended to open the doors of her new business on 1 March 2022 (with the financial year ending on
28 February each year). Due to an unforeseen delay in obtaining an overdraft facility from her bank, trading
only commenced on 15 May 2022. Bizzie has registered as a vendor for VAT purposes in her own name,
as the estimated total value of taxable supplies will exceed R1 000 000 in the first 12 months based on
fixed contractual agreements.
Bizzie paid the rent of the business premises on 1 June 2022 for 12 months in advance. She has also
appointed four permanent staff members (not connected to herself) to assist her in dealing with the
customers and to operate the dry-cleaning machine. Bizzie pays the staff members a cash salary every
month as well as 50% of their monthly medical aid membership, as per the medical aid fund contract.
Bizzie expects her business to suffer a loss by the end of the financial year. She still takes care of the day-
to-day management of the business.
• Will the expenses she has incurred prior to 15 May 2022 be deductible for income tax purposes?
• Will she be able to deduct the rent paid for the business premises for tax purposes?
• Are the monthly cash salaries and medical aid fund contributions paid by her deductible for tax
purposes?
• She knows that normal tax is payable annually in respect of a year of assessment; therefore she wants
to know what will happen if the business suffers a loss in the current financial year of assessment.
Should she rather not pay the rent in advance so that she will be able to deduct the rent in the following
year?
11 TAX4862/105/2023
Discussion activity
Before attempting to help Bizzie with her questions, work through and master learning unit 7.
Only then will you be ready to identify areas of concern that should be brought to the
attention of the Beancounter family. The outcomes (solution) for the Beancounter scenario
will be made available on myUnisa during your study week for this learning unit. You need
to review these outcomes to improve your own understanding of the tax principles involved.
We provide you with a Table of Reference which contains the references to all the sections which you
must study in this learning unit, together with a reference to the relevant paragraph in SILKE and a
reference to additional notes provided (if any) in the tutorial letter, as well as an indication of whether a
specific section is examinable or not. Use the Table of Reference to guide you through the content of the
learning unit in this tutorial letter. We also guide you on how to spend your time. You should therefore work
your way through the content by starting at the top of the table and working your way through to the end.
In addition, please refer to TL102 for the relevant case law that applies to this learning unit. As the allocated
time is limited, you will require additional reading time to study case law. You only have to study the case
law in TL102. You may ignore case law mentioned in SILKE which is NOT dealt with in TL102 (highlighted
in grey in the textbook).
Marks will be awarded in a test or the exam for stating the correct principles of important
case law. Refer to TL102 which contains short summaries of the prescribed case law. Note
that these summaries do not represent an exhaustive list of established principles and merely
indicate the relevant part(s) of the tax legislation considered and principles
considered/established in the respective cases. Study these summaries together with the
summaries of the respective cases in SILKE. There is also a video uploaded on myUnisa and
the Tax YouTube channel on how to study and apply the case law.
You must be able to apply the relevant principles of particular cases to a particular set of
facts.
We are not ignorant of the fact that most of our students study part time. We therefore realise that you
may not always have the time available to follow the above study approach fully, with specific reference to
our recommendation that you read a section in the Income Tax Act. However, you still need to flag and
underline your Income Tax Act for you to benefit from the limited open-book policy for the tests, the
examination and the 2024 ITC examinations.
SILKE has a table of provisions towards the back of the book (just before the subject index). This is a
handy table to use if you have a specific section on which you need more information. The table provides
the paragraphs in SILKE which contain information on a specific section.
12 TAX4862/105/2023
As mentioned above, the following table contains references to all the sections of the Income Tax Act that
you must study in this learning unit, together with a reference to the relevant paragraph in SILKE and a
reference to additional notes provided in the tutorial letter (if any), as well as an indication of whether a
specific section is examinable or not. Download the relevant interpretation notes from the following link:
http://www.sars.gov.za/legal-counsel/legal-advisory/Interpretation-notes/
Reference to Reference
Reference
the Income Topic to notes in Examinable
to SILKE
Tax Act TL
DAY 1 (3 hours)
General deduction formula, pre-trade expenditure and losses, prohibited deductions, prepaid
expenditure and prohibition against double deductions (1 hour)
s 11(a) & Overview and general deduction formula 12.1 & 6.1 7.6.1 Yes
11(x) & 6.3
Interpretation Note No. 54 (Issue 2): Deductions: Corrupt activities, fines and penalties
Case law: TL102 Yes
- Refer to chapter 3 of TL102 for an Chapter 3
exhaustive list of case law relevant to
general deduction
Interpretation Note No. 7: Restraint of trade payments (Bear in mind that para-
graph (cA) of the gross income definition, as well as section 11(cA) referred to in the
interpretation note were amended in 2008 (i.e. the terms “personal service company”
and “personal service trust” were replaced by the term “personal service provider”). It is
thus the previous terms that are still reflected in Interpretation Note No. 7.
Reference to Reference
Reference
the Income Topic to notes in Examinable
to SILKE
Tax Act TL
s 12M Deduction of medical lump sum payments 12.2.3 No
s 11(lA) Shares issued by employers in terms of s 8B 12.2.4 No
s 11(m) Annuities to former employees or partners 12.2.5 Yes
and their dependants
Excluding 11(jA)
Reference to Reference
Reference
the Income Topic to notes in Examinable
to SILKE
Tax Act TL
- 18A(1A), (1B), (1C), (2), (2A) – (2D), (3A) & (3B),
(4) – (7)
(It will be stated that a section 18A receipt was
obtained.)
DAY 2 (3 hours)
Special deductions – section 24
s 24 Allowance for outstanding debt: Credit 12.10 7.5 & Yes
agreements and debtors allowance 7.6.4
(Only the gross profit method will be tested.)
Interpretation Note No. 48 (Issue 3): Instalment credit agreements and debtors
allowance
Assessed losses
s 20 Assessed losses 12.12 – 7.5 Yes
12.12.2
s 20A Ring-fencing of assessed losses of TL106 Yes (but not
natural persons for test 2)
Interpretation Note No. 33 (Issue 5): Assessed losses: Companies: The “trade” and
“income from trade” requirements
Comprehensive examples
You may ignore the following paragraphs in SILKE as these paragraphs are excluded from the syllabus:
The taxation laws are amended annually. These amendments are firstly published in the form of draft Bills
and then as Bills. Only once the Bills have been passed through Parliament and once it is then assented
to by the President, they are published as Acts.
The following Amendment Acts, relevant to your studies, were published on 05 January 2023:
• Rates and Monetary Amounts and Amendment of Revenue Laws Act 19 of 2022
• Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022; and
• Tax Administration Laws Amendment Act 16 of 2022.
'image: Flaticon.com'. The weblink icon has been designed using resources from Flaticon.com
The important amendments which are applicable to this LU are summarised below. Certain amendments
that were enacted in the prior year’s Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2021, are also summarised for
your reference.
Certain law amendments enacted by the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022:
From years of assessment ending on any date on or after 31 March 2023, the
tax rate of companies will change from 28% to 27%.
16 TAX4862/105/2023
Certain law amendments enacted by the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022:
A proviso has been added to section 7B(2) that provides that where the
employee is deceased before the date of payment, the amount is deemed to
accrue to the employee and constitutes expenditure incurred by the employer,
on the day during the year of assessment prior to the date of the employee’s
death.
The addition of par (g) and of the new proviso to section 7B(2) applies with
effect from 1 March 2023 and applies in respect of amounts accrued or
expenditure incurred on or after this date.
(Section 7B deals with both incurral and accrual. The accrual aspect will be
covered in TL106.)
Section 24 Allowance for outstanding debt: Credit agreements and debtors
allowance
Section 24 has been amended by the insertion of subsections (2A) and (2B)
which relate to lay-by agreements.
Section 24(2A) states that the Commissioner may allow a section 24 allowance
for all amounts deemed to have accrued, but not yet received, by the end of
the taxpayer’s year of assessment under a lay-by agreement (as contemplated
in section 62 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2008 (Act 68 of 2008)).
Section 24(2B) states that any allowance claimable under section 24(2A) must
be added back to (or included in) the taxpayer’s income in the following year of
assessment.
As a result of the above two new subsections, the wording in section 24(2) was
amended to note that the agreement referred to in section 24(2), excludes lay-
by agreements as they are specifically dealt with in section 24(2A) and (2B).
Another amendment was made to section 24(2) where the words ‘he’ and ‘him’
were amended to refer to ‘the Commissioner’, and the word ‘his’ was amended
to refer to ‘the taxpayer’.
This amendment came into effect on 1 January 2023 and applies in respect of
years of assessment ending on or after this date.
These new subsections are also explained in par 12.10 in SILKE on page 380.
17 TAX4862/105/2023
Certain law amendments enacted by the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022:
Certain law amendments enacted by the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2021:
Section 12H was only applicable if the registered learnership was entered into
between a learner and an employer before 1 April 2022, the application of
section 12H has been extended to registered learnership agreements entered
into before 1 April 2024.
(This amendment came into operation on 1 April 2022 and applies in respect
of learnership agreements entered into on or after this date.)
7.6.1 The general deduction formula (sections 11(a) and 23(g) and SILKE 6.3 and 6.5.7)
The general deduction formula is contained in section 11(a) read with section 23(g). Section 11(a) contains
the positive criteria and section 23(g) the negative criteria.
The diagram below shows the treatment of expenditure and losses in terms of sections 11(a) and 23 once
their nature has been determined:
Expenditure
and losses
Section 23(o) – Interpretation Note No. 54: Deductions – Corrupt activities, fines and
penalties (see SARS website)
Interpretation Note No. 54 (Issue 2) was issued on 25 January 2017 and examines the
meaning and scope of section 23(o). Section 23(o) prohibits the deduction for income tax
purposes of expenditure incurred in respect of
• corruption or a corrupt activity; or
• a fine or penalty imposed as a result of an unlawful activity.
In other words, corrupt payments such as bribes, fines and penalties for unlawful activities
are not tax deductible. However, the deduction of bona fide commercial penalties is not
affected by the provisions of section 23(o). The deduction of such commercial penalties
must be considered in terms of the general deduction formula.
19 TAX4862/105/2023
Be aware of the difference between the tests for establishing whether an item of expenditure is incurred
“in the production of income” and whether that expenditure is “capital or revenue in nature”. The tests are
different.
The tests used to establish whether gross income is capital or revenue in nature are also completely
different from the tests used to establish whether expenditure is capital or revenue in nature. The table
below provides a list of the different tests established by the courts in determining the capital/revenue
nature of gross income versus expenditure.
You have now studied the requirements of the general deduction formula and the relevant
case law principles. You should be able to answer the following query relating to the applicable
case law principle(s) in respect of the general deduction formula.
Share your solution on the myUnisa discussion forum, then refer to the outcomes (solution)
that will be made available on myUnisa on the Friday of your study week.
Joy Stores (Pty) Ltd (“Joy Stores”) is a South African company with a 31 March financial
year-end. The company is a category A registered VAT vendor. Joy Stores is a soft toy
retailer and purchased soft toys, for resale, for R25 000 (VAT exclusive) on 25 March 2023.
The company paid a 20% deposit of R5 000 on the date of receipt of the invoice,
26 March 2023. The purchase transaction was subject to delivery of the stock in good order
at Joy Stores’ premises. The stock was delivered in good order and received by the
company on 5 April 2023. Joy Stores paid the balance of the purchase price of R20 000 at
the time of delivery.
Discuss, with reference to legislation and case law principles, whether the R25 000 will be
deductible by Joy Stores for tax purposes in its 2023 year of assessment.
No reference to relevant case names is required. (7 marks)
7.6.2 Pre-trade expenditure and losses (section 11A and SILKE 6.2.1)
SARS issued Interpretation Note No. 51 (Issue 5) on 27 June 2018, which provides guidance on when
pre-trade expenses (including expenditure and losses) will be allowed as a deduction for income tax
purposes.
• Section 11A allows the deduction of pre-trade expenses in the year of assessment in which
trade commences, subject to certain requirements (irrespective of when the expenses were
incurred).
• Section 11A is subject to section 23H.
• The section 11A deduction applies to all pre-trade expenses actually incurred which would have
been allowed as a deduction in terms of sections 11 (excluding section 11(x)), 11D (ignore) or
24J had the expenses been incurred after commencement of the carrying on of that trade.
• This means that the pre-trade expenses are ring-fenced and only pre-trade expenses actually
incurred in the preparation for carrying on the particular trade will be deductible from the income
resulting from that specific trade. Also, where pre-trade expenses have been incurred towards
a particular project and that project is abandoned prior to the commencement of trade, such pre-
trade expenses will not be deductible under section 11A. Read through examples 3 and 4 of
Interpretation Note 51.
• Certain capital allowances granted in terms of the following paragraphs of section 11 can qualify
for deduction under section 11A(1) (provided that all the necessary requirements have been
met):
- (cA) (restraint of trade payments – LU 7); (e) (wear-and-tear allowance – LU 8, see note
below); (f) (lease premiums - LU 8); (g) (leasehold improvements – LU 8); (gA) (ignore); (gC)
(intellectual property – LU 8); (gD) (ignore) and (hB) (ignore).
A wear-and-tear (section 11(e)) allowance will qualify for deduction under section 11A only
if the specific asset
- has a cost (therefore an asset acquired by, for example, a donation or inheritance will
not qualify); and
- was used during the pre-trade period.
A section 11(e) allowance is not available if the asset is not used for purposes of the
taxpayer’s trade. Therefore, if the asset would not have qualified for an allowance under
section 11(e) (had the asset been acquired after commencement of the carrying on of
that trade), it will not qualify for a deduction under section 11A. An example where a
section 11A deduction is not available is where the asset was acquired but kept in
storage pending the commencement of that trade.
• In terms of section 11A(2), the deduction is limited to the taxable income derived from the
particular trade prior to the deduction of the section 11A pre-trade expenses. Therefore, pre-
trade expenses cannot create (or increase) an assessed loss in respect of the relevant trade.
Furthermore, the excess is ring-fenced. In other words, it may not be set off against income from
a different trade. The excess can, however, be carried forward to the subsequent year of
assessment for set-off against taxable income derived from the same trade. Should the taxpayer
have an assessed loss as opposed to taxable income, the assessed loss and the excess pre-
trade expenses will be carried forward to the subsequent year of assessment at the same time.
The excess pre-trade expenses will be carried forward each year until it can be set off against
any taxable income derived from that trade.
21 TAX4862/105/2023
The following diagram may assist in a better understanding of the application of section 11A:
Year of assessment
Commence trading
Section 23H seeks to match the timing of the deduction in terms of sections 11(a), (c), (d), (w), or 11A with
the amount of goods supplied, the period of service or the entitlement to other benefits derived during that
year of assessment. In other words, section 23H limits the deduction allowable in terms of sections 11(a),
(c), (d), (w), or 11(A) even though the amount has actually been incurred.
There are four instances when section 23H will not apply and we comment on two of them as follows:
• The first is where all the goods or services are supplied or all the benefits are enjoyed within six
months after year-end. No apportionment should then be made in terms of section 23H; thus
section 23H will not apply.
• The second instance, namely “if the aggregate of all the amounts of expenditure, which may otherwise
have been limited by section 23H, does not exceed R100 000”, should be applied last (thus, excluding
cases where the benefit will be received within six months).
22 TAX4862/105/2023
Example
Prepaid expenditure (section 23H)
Full Prepaid
Year of assessment ended 28 February 2023 expense portion
R R
Rent paid (section 11(a))
(prepaid for 4 months after Feb 2023) 330 000 x 4/12 months = 110 000
Insurance (section 11(a))
(prepaid for 8 months after Feb 2023) 105 000 x 8/12 months = 70 000
Maintenance (section 11(d))
(prepaid for 10 months after Feb 2023) 40 500 x 10/12 months = 33 750
475 500 213 750
• The R330 000, R105 000 and R40 500 have actually been incurred.
• The prepaid amount for rent relates to a period of 4 months after year-end; therefore it will not be
subject to section 23H and the full amount of R330 000 may be claimed in the 2023 year of
assessment even though the prepaid portion is R110 000 (which is > R100 000).
• Both of the other prepaid amounts (R70 000 and R33 750) relate to a benefit, which will be enjoyed
over a period exceeding 6 months after year-end.
• In terms of proviso (bb) to section 23H, the deduction of the R105 000 in terms of section 11(a) and
R40 500 in terms of section 11(d) will be limited, as the aggregate of the prepaid amounts (not
otherwise limited by the section) exceeds R100 000, namely R103 750 (R70 000 + R33 750). Only
the portion which was enjoyed during the 2023 year of assessment will be deductible in the 2023 year
of assessment.
• Therefore, deductible for income tax purposes in the 2023 year of assessment is the full amount of
rent paid (R330 000), R35 000 (i.e. R105 000 – R70 000 or R105 000 x 4/12 months) in terms of
section 11(a) (insurance) and R6 750 (i.e. R40 500 – R33 750 or R40 500 x 2/12 months) in terms of
section 11(d) (maintenance).
• The prepaid portions of R70 000 and R33 750 will be deductible in the following (2024) year of
assessment in terms of section 11(a) and 11(d), respectively.
However, if the insurance were, for example, prepaid for 7 months of the 2024 year of assessment in the
above example and the maintenance were prepaid for 8 months of the 2024 year of assessment, the
aggregate of the prepaid amounts (not otherwise limited by the section) would not exceed R100 000:
R61 250 (R105 000 x 7/12 months) + R27 000 (R40 500 x 8/12 months) = R88 250
and the full R105 000 and R40 500 would accordingly be deductible in the 2023 year of assessment in
terms of section 11(a) and section 11(d), respectively.
Although not specifically included in this learning unit, we feel that it will add value to incorporate
a table to explain the different tax treatments of leases and suspensive sale agreements. Study
the table provided.
The most important difference between leases and suspensive sale agreements for normal tax purposes
is the fact that a lease (finance lease or operating lease) is treated as a rental agreement for normal tax
purposes, whereas a suspensive sale agreement is treated as a sale for normal tax purposes.
23 TAX4862/105/2023
Lessor Seller
• Taxed on instalments (remember to exclude • Sale of asset (trading stock) Selling price
VAT) received or accrued during the year of included in gross income (excluding finance
assessment. cost and VAT) less cost of sales (deducted as
• Include lease premium and leasehold improve- purchase price or opening stock).
ments (an obligation to effect) in gross income • Sale of asset (allowance asset)
in terms of paragraphs (g) & (h) to the gross Recoupment included in taxable income.
income definition (remember possible relief in • Sale of asset (capital asset) Capital gain or
terms of section 11(h)). loss aggregated with other capital gains or
• The lessor may claim capital allowances losses and any aggregate capital gain is
(sections 12C, 13(1), 13quin, 13sex or 11(e)), included in taxable income at the relevant
if applicable, on original cost of the asset. inclusion rate of the taxpayer.
• Claim other related expenses in terms of • Finance cost included in gross income, spread
section 11(a). over the period of the agreement in terms of
• Remember the possible application of sec- section 24J.
tions 23A and 23D (both sections are excluded • Possible section 24 allowance available on out-
from your syllabus). standing debtor’s balance.
VAT VAT
• Lease agreement (finance lease) – Treated as • Instalment credit agreement, therefore pay full
an instalment credit agreement. Account for full amount of VAT (output tax) on receipt of any
amount of VAT (output tax) on receipt of any payment or delivery of goods.
payment or delivery of goods.
• Rental agreement (operating lease) – Account (Note: VAT treatment same for finance lease and
for output tax on earlier of date that payment is suspensive sale.)
due or payment is received.
Lessee Purchaser
• Deduct amount actually incurred in terms of • Bought an asset capitalise asset (excluding
section 11(a) (full instalment – remember to VAT) and claim capital allowance on purchase
exclude VAT). price.
• Deduct lease premium in terms of section 11(f) • Claim finance cost in terms of section 24J.
and leasehold improvements in terms of
section 11(g). Remember, excess improve-
ments could be deductible in terms of
section 13(1).
• At the termination of lease, remember possible
section 8(5) recoupment.
24 TAX4862/105/2023
VAT VAT
• Lease agreement (finance lease) – Claim full • Claim full amount of VAT (input tax) if in
amount of input tax if in possession of a valid possession of valid tax invoice.
tax invoice (same time of supply rules as for the
lessor). (Note: VAT treatment same for finance lease and
• Rental agreement (operating lease) – Claim suspensive sale.)
VAT (input tax) on each instalment (same time
of supply rules as above for the lessor).
Read through the Beancounter scenario again, and/or watch the cartoon under the Lessons
on myUnisa, and make a rough summary of what your solution would be now that you have
studied this learning unit. You should now be able to answer Bizzie Beancounter’s queries.
Share your solution on the myUnisa discussion forum, then refer to the outcomes (solution)
that will be made available on myUnisa on the Friday of your study week.
This learning unit introduced you to the content in the Income Tax Act that is relevant to the general
deduction, special deductions and assessed losses together with the relevant law amendments. The table
of reference under 7.4.2 was provided to guide you through the work. You need to have a good
understanding of case law so that you can use the principles thereof to answer discussion type questions.
Consider every scenario to critically analyse all aspects of the general deduction formula. Ensure that you
have worked through (flagged and highlighted) the sections referred to in learning unit 7 (refer to 7.4.2) in
your Income Tax Act as well as in your prescribed textbook, SILKE. Remember to take a look at the
additional resources available for this learning unit on myUnisa and YouTube.
A total of 11 hours (3 hours on 7 April and 8 hours on 8 April) of your study time this week has
been allocated to LU 8.
The above time allocation is only an indication. The amount of time you need to spend on
each topic will be greatly influenced by the knowledge you already have from undergraduate
and previous postgraduate studies. You should therefore adapt the time allocation wherever
necessary to suit your level of prior knowledge.
8.1 BACKGROUND
This learning unit deals with capital allowances available as deductions against income and the related
recoupments, which are included in gross income (in terms of paragraph (n)). It also deals with the
concession or compromise in respect of debt (previously referred to as reduction of debt (section 19)), the
allowance in respect of the disposal of assets (section 11(o)), the limitation of losses from the disposal of
certain assets (section 20B) and the incurral and accrual of amounts in respect of assets acquired or
disposed of for unquantified amounts (section 24M).
26 TAX4862/105/2023
TAX FRAMEWORK
The topics covered in this learning unit fit into the tax framework as follows:
GROSS INCOME (s 1)
LESS: Exempt income (ss 10 and 10A to 10C)
= INCOME
LESS: Deductions and allowances (ss 11 – 24P, excluding s 18A & s 20)
LESS: Assessed loss brought forward (s 20)
ADD: Amounts to be included in taxable income including TAXABLE CAPITAL GAINS
LESS: Qualifying donations (s 18A)
= TAXABLE INCOME
As you work through the legislation, you need to remember and apply ethical behaviour. In line with the
UNGC principles introduced in TL102, compliance with the laws and regulations is the basis on which the
taxation legislation is founded.
UNGC principle 9 encourages the development and diffusion of environmentally friendly technologies. It
is worth mentioning that there are some capital allowances in sections 12I, 12L, 12U, 37B, 37C and 37D
which relate to, among other things, energy efficiency savings deductions and environmental and land
conservation expenditure, that enhance UNGC principle 9. Although these are specifically excluded from
your syllabus, it is important for you to be cognisant of these types of allowances for your own
development.
UNGC principle 10 states that businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including extortion
and bribery. Therefore, to intentionally claim capital allowances on fictional assets or to inflate the
allowances claimed would result in tax evasion, which would fall within the ambit of corruption. Since
UNGC principle 10 encourages entities to find a balance between the social obligation to pay taxes and
tax planning, in order to minimise the ‘cost’ of these taxes for an entity within the ambit of the law, it is
important to keep the UNGC principle 10 in mind when studying this unit.
The most important outcome, however, is that you should be able to apply
your knowledge in practical case studies and in integrated questions (to
calculate and discuss) similar to those provided in sections B and C of this
tutorial letter by using critical thinking.
27 TAX4862/105/2023
Before you start studying the detailed provisions of capital allowances and recoupments, read
the following scenario relating to the Beancounter family, and/or watch the cartoon posted
under Lessons on myUnisa. The scenario requires you to read through the information
provided. As you study the applicable sections in the Income Tax Act, identify areas of concern
that should be brought to the attention of the Beancounter family. Refer back to TL102/2023,
TL103/2023 and TL104/2023 for background information on the Beancounter Family.
Bizzie-as-a-bee Cleaners is now in full operation. Bizzie has acquired a new dry-cleaning machine, a
delivery van, a computer and some furniture for the reception area. All these assets were bought from VAT
vendors.
Bizzie wants to know which tax allowances and deductions she may claim in respect of the new assets
that she purchased.
Discussion activity
Before attempting to help Bizzie with her query, work through and master learning unit 8.
Only then will you be ready to identify areas of concern that should be brought to the
attention of the Beancounter family. The outcomes (solution) for the Beancounter scenario
will be made available on myUnisa during your study week for this learning unit. You need
to review these outcomes to improve your own understanding of the tax principles involved.
We provide you with a Table of Reference which contains the references to the paragraphs in SILKE,
together with the references to the additional notes provided (if any) in this tutorial letter, as well as the
references to all the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act which you must study in this learning unit.
Refer to the study approach that we recommend in paragraph 7.4.1 in this tutorial letter.
The following table contains references to the paragraphs in SILKE, the additional notes in this tutorial
letter and all the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act that you must study in this learning unit, as well
as an indication of whether a specific section is examinable or not. Download the relevant interpretation
notes from the following link:
https://www.sars.gov.za/legal-counsel/legal-advisory/interpretation-notes/
Reference
Reference
to the Reference
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income Tax to SILKE
TL
Act
DAY 3 (3 hours)
SILKE: Overview 13.1
Core concepts (10 minutes)
s1 Connected person 13.2.1 8.5 Yes
Interpretation Note No. 67 (Issue 4): Connected persons
Machinery, plant, implements, utensils 13.2.2 Yes
and articles
Process of manufacture 13.2.3 Yes
(Information will be provided as to whether
a particular process is a manufacturing (or
similar) process.)
s1 Depreciable asset 13.2.4 Yes
Reference
Reference
to the Reference
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income Tax to SILKE
TL
Act
Information will be provided as to whether a
particular process is a manufacturing (or
similar) process.)
Excluding
s 13(1A) and 13(8) No
s 13quat Urban development zones 13.4.2 No
s 13sex Residential units 13.4.3 8.6.1 & Yes
8.6.6
s1 Definition of a residential unit 13.4.3 Yes
Reference
Reference
to the Reference
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income Tax to SILKE
TL
Act
Excluding s 12N(3) No
s 23A Limitation of allowances for lessors of 13.7.5 No
certain assets
s 23D Sale and leaseback arrangements 13.7.6 No
s 23G Sale and leaseback arrangements (tax- 13.7.6 No
exempt bodies)
Intellectual property (30 minutes)
s 11(gA) Acquisitions and registration of intellectual No
property before 1 January 2004
s 11(gB) Granting, renewal and registration of 13.8.1 8.6.7 Yes
intellectual property
s 11(gC) Acquisition of patents, designs, 13.8.1 8.6.7 Yes
copyrights or other similar property (not
a trade mark)
s 11D Deductions in respect of scientific or 13.8.1 No
technological research and development
s 23I Prohibitions of deductions in respect of 13.8.1 No
certain intellectual property
Allowances on other types of assets
s 11(gD) Government business licences 13.9.1 No
s 12I Industrial policy project allowance 13.9.2 No
s 12L Energy efficiency savings deduction 13.9.3 No
s 12U Additional deduction for roads and fences 13.9.4 No
used in respect of the production of
renewable energy
s 37B Environmental expenditure 13.9.5 No
s 37C Environmental conservation and 13.9.6 No
maintenance
s 37D Land conservation in respect of nature 13.9.7 No
reserves and national parks
Recoupments and concession or compromise regarding debt (180 minutes)
s 8(4)(a) Recoupments: General recoupment 13.2.5 & 8.5 Yes
Provision 13.10.1
s 8(4)(b) Actuarial surplus paid from a pension fund 13.10.1 No
s 24M Incurral and accrual of amounts in 13.10.1 & 8.6.9 Yes
respect of assets acquired or disposed 6.3.2.1
of for unquantified amount
s 8(4)(k) Recoupments: Donations, asset in 13.10.2 Yes
specie distributions, the disposal of
assets to connected persons or change
of use to trading stock
s 8(4)(e) – Recoupments: Deferred recoupment of 13.10.3 Yes
(eE) allowances
par 65 of 8 th
Roll-overs: Involuntary disposals 17.10.3.1 Yes
Schedule
par 66 of 8th Roll-overs: Reinvestment in 17.10.3.2 Yes
Schedule replacement assets
31 TAX4862/105/2023
Reference
Reference
to the Reference
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income Tax to SILKE
TL
Act
s 8(4)(l) Recoupments: Interest or related finance 13.10.4 No
charges
s 8(4)(n) Recoupments: Industrial policy project 13.10.5 No
allowance
s 8(4A) Recoupments: Deemed allowance No
s 8(5) Recoupments: Acquisition of hired 13.10.6 8.6.8 Yes
assets
s 19 read Recoupments: Concession or 13.10.7 8.5 Yes
with par 12A compromise regarding a debt (previously
reduction or cancellation of debt).
(Context will indicate whether it is a
commercial decision or a donation)
Paragraphs that you can ignore in total are indicated in the table above.
You may ignore the following parts of paragraphs in SILKE due to the fact that they deal with sections that
are excluded from the syllabus:
SILKE
Topic
reference
13.2.2 & 13.2.3 Information will be provided as to whether a particular process is a manufacturing (or
similar) process as defined
13.3.2 The part that refers to s 12B(1)(f)
13.3.3 The part of the table that refers to industrial machinery or plant used under a supply
agreement in the automotive industry, agricultural co-operatives, hotelkeepers and
machinery or plant used for research and development purposes
13.4.3 The part that refers to s 25BB(4)
13.6.1 The part that refers to ss 24P and 12Q
13.6.2 Immovable assets – airport and port assets (the whole paragraph)
13.8.1 The part that deals with ss 11D and 23I (both sections are excluded from the SAICA
syllabus)
13.10.1 The part that refers to s 8(4)(b)
Before continuing with learning unit 8, take note of the following amendment to the Income Tax Act, which
is contained in the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022. Certain amendments that were enacted in
the prior year’s Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2021 are also summarised for your reference.
Paragraph (x) has been added to the provisos to section 11(e), it provides
that no allowance may be made in respect of any machinery, plant,
implement, utensil or article acquired by the taxpayer as, or with, a
‘government grant’ as defined in section 12P(1).
If a debt owed by a person is reduced and the amount of the debt is owed in
respect of, or was used to fund expenditure in respect of, an allowance asset
that was disposed of during a year of assessment prior to the year in which
that debt benefit arises, the portion of the debt benefit, that relates to
• the amount (if any) that was recovered or recoupment in the year of
assessment during which the allowance asset was disposed of,
without taking the debt benefit into account,
This amendment came into effect on 1 January 2023 and applies in respect
of years of assessment ending on or after this date.
The tax rates for small business corporations were amended in the budget speech on
22 February 2023.
The tax rates for small business corporations with years of assessment ending on any date
between 1 April 2023 and 31 March 2024 will be as follows:
The amendment to section 19(8)(f) makes it clear that section 19 will not
apply to the extent that the debt owed represents interest as defined in
section 24J incurred by that person during any year of assessment. The
words defined in section 24J was added to this subsection.
For capital allowances, a distinction should be made between assets which are purchased/acquired (see
note 8.6.1 below) and assets which are rented/hired/leased (see note 8.6.2 below).
The taxation rules relating to assets acquired by the taxpayer can be divided into three areas: the first area
deals with the cost incurred that can be included in the cost of acquiring the asset, the second area deals
with the rate of the allowances that can be claimed while the person is using the assets and the last area
deals with the sale or disposal of the asset. The following table summarises the main sections of the
Income Tax Act that deal with each of the above areas:
Topic Section
Acquisition of the asset • S 1: Definition of a connected person and depreciable asset
(cost price) • S 23C: Reducing the cost or market value of certain assets with input
tax claimed
• Ss 11(e), 12B, 12C, 12E: Cost determinations
• VAT Act
• Ss 24I and 25D: Foreign currency transactions (See LU 10)
Use of the asset • S 11(e): Wear-and-tear allowance (read with Binding General Ruling
(allowances) No. 7/Interpretation Note No. 47)
• S 12C: Special wear-and-tear allowance
35 TAX4862/105/2023
Topic Section
• S 12E: Deductions in respect of a small business corporation
• S 13: Deduction in respect of buildings used in a manufacturing
process
• S 13sex: Deduction in respect of certain residential units
• S 13sept: Sale of low-cost residential units on loan account
• S 13quin: Deduction in respect of commercial buildings
• Ss 24I and 25D: Foreign currency transactions (See LU 10)
Sale of the asset • S 8(4)(a): General recoupment provision
(recoupment) • S 8(4)(e), (eA), (eB), (eC), (eD) & (eE): Deferred recoupments
• S 13(3)
• S 19: Concession or compromise in respect of debt
• S 11(o): Alienation, loss or destruction allowance (previously
scrapping allowance)
• S 20B: Limitation of losses from disposal of certain assets
• Eighth Schedule: CGT
Example
Capital allowances
We can use the following simplified example to explain capital allowances in the Income Tax Act:
A taxpayer, which is a manufacturer and a registered vendor (but not a small business corporation),
acquires a second-hand manufacturing asset from a non-vendor for R1 000. The company used the asset
for 3 months in year 1 and 6 months in year 2. Binding General Ruling No. 7 (Interpretation Note No. 47)
allows taxpayers to claim wear-and-tear over a 5-year period on these assets. The taxpayer received
R1 500 cash when it sold the asset in year 2. Your friend gave the following answer in a test:
He failed the test, getting 0/10 for the answer above. Can you identify the mistakes he made?
• As this is a second-hand asset, a deemed input tax can be claimed. Therefore, the cost of the asset
should be R1 000 x 100/115 = R870 (section 23C).
• The taxpayer is a manufacturer, but not a small business corporation. Therefore, the manufacturing
asset acquired qualifies for section 12C and not section 11(e) read with Binding General Ruling No. 7
(Interpretation Note No. 47). As this is a second-hand asset, the asset qualifies for a 20% write-off
per annum for 5 years.
• The section 12C wear-and-tear allowance of 20% per annum is not apportioned. Therefore, in year 1
and year 2 the taxpayer will qualify for an allowance of R174 (R870 x 20% = R174).
• As the taxpayer is a registered vendor and the asset is sold, the sale is subject to VAT. The amount
received therefore includes VAT of R1 500 x 15/115 = R196, and the exclusive selling price is
therefore R1 304.
• The recoupment will be the selling price (excluding VAT; R1 304) less the tax value of R522 (R870
– R174 – R174), thus R782; however, remember that the recoupment is limited to allowances pre-
viously claimed, namely R348 (R174 + R174).
• As it is a capital asset being sold, the CGT provisions must be applied.
36 TAX4862/105/2023
Remember, terminology is important when answering taxation questions. For example, you
must use “base cost” and not “cost” when dealing with CGT.
• The proceeds must be reduced by the amount included for income tax purposes (the recoupment).
Proceeds = Selling price (R1 304) – Recoupment (R348) = R956.
• The base cost will be the cost incurred (R870) less the allowances claimed (R348) = R522.
• The capital gain on the disposal of the asset will be R434 (R956 – R522). Remember that all the
gains and losses for different assets must be added to calculate the taxable capital gain. Depending
on the type of taxpayer, you will apply the annual exclusion (if applicable) and the relevant inclusion
rate to determine the taxable capital gain.
Remember, whenever a capital asset is sold, even for less than the original cost, a capital gain
must be calculated. Although the capital gain will be Rnil, the Income Tax Act still requires a
calculation to be done; marks are awarded for the calculation.
The deductions that the taxpayer (lessee) can qualify for when entering into a lease will depend on the
nature of the amount being paid, for example
The amount of the leasehold improvements is included in the gross income (paragraph (h) of the gross
income definition) of the lessor, subject to certain allowances. Always read the information carefully to
determine if you are dealing with the lessee or lessor when answering a question.
A taxpayer (lessee) must construct a building for R100 000 on leased land in terms of a contract. The
actual cost amounted to R150 000.
It is important to remember that the allowances which may be claimed depend not only on the type of asset
used, but also on the status of the taxpayer (lessor) that owns it. These rules are mutually exclusive.
8.6.4 Sections 11(e) and 12C allowances summary (SILKE 13.3.1 and 13.3.3)
In SILKE paragraph 13.12.1 a summary (including a summary of section 13) is provided. The table below
is more comprehensive.
Where machinery, mounted onto a foundation, Applicable to movable assets only: no allowance
qualifies for the section 12C deduction, so too will for buildings or other permanent structures (except
the foundation (proviso to section 12C(1)). foundations and supporting structures if they are
designed for the asset and have a similar useful
life).
Available to the owner of that asset or the Available to the owner of that asset or the pur-
purchaser (under a suspensive sale agree- chaser (under a suspensive sale agreement) of
ment) of the asset. the asset.
Machinery and plant, leased out by the taxpayer A lessor can claim wear-and-tear on assets leased
in terms of a financial (or operating) lease and in terms of a financial lease. Note, however, the
used by the lessee directly in a manufacturing or possible limitation in terms of sections 23A or 23D.
similar process, also qualify. It is then the lessor
that is entitled to the allowance. Note, however,
the possible limitation in terms of sections 23A or
23D (both sections are excluded from your
syllabus).
New or used
Brought into use for the first time by the taxpayer Used for trade purposes by the taxpayer or lessee.
or lessee for trade purposes.
Calculated on cost, which is the lesser of actual Calculated on value, thus possible to claim wear-
cost or cost under a cash transaction concluded and-tear on an asset that has no cost. However,
at arm’s length. No cost = no allowance. the practice is to use cost if available and
applicable.
Cost includes direct cost (which includes shipping Value is the direct cost of acquisition under a cash
and delivery charges) of foundations, installation transaction concluded at arm’s length and includes
and erection. shipping and delivery charges, cost of foundation
or supporting structures and the direct cost of
installation and erection, plus the cost of moving
these assets from one location to another (if not
written off in terms of section 11(a)); otherwise use
market value.
38 TAX4862/105/2023
• Asset not yet written off – deduct over Write off over the remaining write-off period of the
remaining years (including current year) in asset.
equal instalments.
Asset fully written off – deduct in full.
Accelerated allowances (for new or unused plant Period of write-off per Binding General Ruling
and machinery only – thus not second-hand): No. 7 (Interpretation Note No. 47). Written
application for other periods.
• 40/20/20/20% p.a. Not available to banking,
financial services, insurance or rental busines- (You will be provided with the number of years over
ses. which assets may be written off in terms of Binding
General Ruling No. 7/Interpretation Note No. 47.)
• 50/30/20% p.a. for new or unused machinery
and plant used for research and development Small items: If the value of the item (not forming
(excluded from syllabus this year). part of a set) is < R7 000, it can be written off to R1
in the year of acquisition. Note, however, that this
In all other instances (thus used (i.e. second- small item write-off does not apply to assets
hand) plant and machinery) – 20% p.a. acquired by a lessor for letting purposes.
Comparison of the movable asset allowances in sections 11(e), 12C and 12E
Section 11(e) (SILKE 13.3.1) Section 12C (SILKE 13.3.3) Section 12E (SILKE 13.3.4)
Not applicable to Applicable to Applicable to
- manufacturing assets of small - manufacturers (excluding - SBC
business corporations (SBC) SBC), ships, aircraft
(s 12E(1))
- assets that qualify for s 12B
- assets that qualify for s 12C
All movable assets, except Machinery or plant used in a All assets of SBC
where s 12B (SILKE 13.3.2), process of manufacture
s 12C or s 12E(1) applies (or similar process) except for
SBC
Mostly movable non-manu- Only the manufacturing assets of Manufacturing assets – new or
facturing assets, including non- manufacturing enterprises (not used and brought into use for the
manufacturing assets of assets like the office equipment, first time by the taxpayer
manufacturing enterprises vehicles etc.) - new or used and and
brought into use for the first time non-manufacturing (s 12E(1A))
by the taxpayer.
Apportion (pro rata) No apportionment (not pro rata)
Loose assets < R7 000 written
off to R1 (except for assets
leased by lessor, see summary
under 8.6.4 above)
Write-off periods – Binding New/unused – 40/20/20/20% Manufacturing assets - 100%
General Ruling No. Used – 20/20/20/20/20% Non-manufacturing assets -
7/Interpretation Note No. 47 50/30/20%
The following diagram may assist you in deciding which allowances may be claimed:
40 TAX4862/105/2023
8.6.5 Section 12E – deduction in respect of the assets of a small business corporation (SILKE
par 13.3.4)
In the case of non-manufacturing assets acquired by an SBC, the personal liability company, entity or
corporation may elect to write off the asset in terms of
• section 11(e), or
• section 12E(1A) – 50% of the cost of the asset in the year during which the asset was brought
into use for the first time, 30% of the cost in the second year and 20% of the cost in the third year
(50/30/20).
Note that, for example, in the case of assets with a cost of less than R7 000, it will be to the benefit of the
taxpayer to elect section 11(e), as opposed to section 12E(1A), as amounts less than R7 000 can be
written off to R1 (in terms of Binding General Ruling No. 7/Interpretation Note No. 47) in the first year
during which the asset is brought into use (provided the asset is not used for letting purposes). However,
this option is not available for manufacturing assets which must be written off in terms of
section 12E(1) or when not dealing with an SBC; section 12C must then be used.
Owned
OR
Owned Owned
on excess leasehold improvements
OR OR
OR
on section 12N leasehold on section 12N leasehold
on section 12N leasehold
improvements (1 Jan 2013) improvements (1 Jan 2013)
improvements (1 Jan 2013)
Used wholly or mainly in the production of income and for purposes of trade
From 1 October 1999 (Manufacturing) From 1 April 2007 From 21 October 2008
5% on residential units
5% 5% 10% on low-cost residential
units
8.6.7 Intellectual property (section 11(gB) and 11(gC) and SILKE 13.8.1)
When studying the legislation regarding intellectual property, note the following:
• Section 11(gB) allows for the deduction of the registration or renewal of registration expenses on
intellectual property, including trade marks.
• Section 11(gC) allows for the deduction of the acquisition costs of intellectual property, excluding
trade marks. Only study the part relating to expenditure incurred on or after 1 January 2014.
8.6.8 Recoupment: acquisition of hired assets (section 8(5) and SILKE 13.10.6)
The diagram below may assist you in understanding the provisions of section 8(5) relating to leased assets.
42 TAX4862/105/2023
8.6.9 Unquantified amounts (section 24M, par 39A of the 8th Schedule and SILKE 6.3.2.1,
13.10.1 and 17.9.4)
Section 24M (incurral and accrual of amounts in respect of assets acquired or disposed of for unquantified
amounts) applies to three types of assets:
The first two will be discussed here and disposal of trading stock will be discussed in LU10.
43 TAX4862/105/2023
The seller determines capital gains/losses during the initial year of disposal under normal CGT rules,
except that the proceeds for the initial year are taken into account only to the extent that those amounts
can be fully quantified. This calculation triggers an initial capital gain or loss. However, in terms of
paragraph 39A(1) of the Eighth Schedule, initial capital losses are disregarded (i.e. suspended) during that
year. The seller must then account for further consideration in later years as that consideration becomes
quantified (fully due and payable). This further consideration generates capital gains during each year of
assessment without any base cost offset (paragraph 3(b)(i) of the Eighth Schedule). However, the seller
reduces this gain to the extent of any remaining disregarded losses stemming from the initial year of
disposal (paragraph 39A(2) of the Eighth Schedule). If any disregarded losses still exist once no further
proceeds will accrue, these remaining capital losses can be fully accounted for at that time
(paragraph 39A(3) of the Eighth Schedule).
If a person acquires assets for consideration that wholly or partly include unquantified amounts, the
expenditure incurred (base cost) is accumulated over time. However, future quantified amounts will be
viewed as immediately incurred. More specifically, the person who acquires the asset is initially viewed as
having incurred expenditure to the extent of the quantified consideration provided on disposal. Further
expenditure is added to the disposed asset as further amounts become quantified. If the person who
acquires the asset sells an asset before all amounts are quantified, the gain on the disposal is calculated
without reference to the unquantified amounts. However, further quantified amounts incurred with regard
to the disposed asset will generate capital losses as those are incurred (paragraph 4(b)(ii)) of the Eighth
Schedule).
Refer to the following examples adapted from the Explanatory Memorandum on the Revenue Laws
Amendment Bill, 2004, which have been included to assist you in understanding the application and
implications of section 24M, as well as the interaction of section 24M with the rest of the Income Tax Act.
Illustrative example
Gain on unquantified amounts
Individual A acquired retail property in December 2014 for R250 000. In March 2018, individual A sells all
the retail property to individual B. In terms of the contract, individual B must pay 10% of the profits
generated by the retail property to individual A for 5 years subsequent. Assume the amounts received are
eventually R300 000, R200 000, R150 000, R110 000 and R240 000, starting the end of February 2019.
Result: The special rules of section 24M apply because unquantified payments are involved. Under the
open transaction method, the initial 2019 year will trigger a small R50 000 gain for individual A. Subsequent
years will trigger additional capital gains. The net cumulative capital gain will amount to R750 000
(R1 million proceeds less the R250 000 base cost). Individual B’s base cost in the retail property acquired
is accumulated over the 5 years as and when individual B pays individual A. Therefore, individual B will
have a R300 000 base cost in the first year, R500 000 in the second year, etc.
Illustrative example
Overall gain on unquantified amounts after suspended loss
Individual A acquired retail property in December 2014 for R500 000. In March 2018, individual A sells all
the retail property to individual B. In terms of the contract, individual B must pay 10% of the profits
generated by the retail property to individual A for 5 years subsequent. Assume the amounts received are
eventually R300 000, R200 000, R150 000, R110 000 and R240 000, starting the end of February 2019.
Result: The special rules of section 24M apply because unquantified payments are involved. Under the
open transaction method, the initial 2019 year will trigger a R200 000 suspended loss for individual A.
Subsequent years will trigger capital gains that will first be used against the suspended loss. The net
cumulative capital gain will amount to R500 000 (aggregated R1 million proceeds less the R500 000 base
cost). Individual B’s base cost in the retail property acquired is accumulated over the 5 years as and when
individual B pays individual A. Therefore, individual B will have a R300 000 base cost in the first year,
R500 000 in the second year, etc.
Note that, if an asset which falls within the ambit of section 24M is sold and a recoupment should be
calculated by the seller in terms of section 8(4) or a loss in terms of section 11(o) of the Income Tax Act,
this recoupment or loss should be calculated with reference to the amounts already received by or accrued
to the taxpayer in terms of section 24M (therefore only amounts quantified at that stage). Section 20B, in
conjunction with section 24M, provide for the suspension of a loss made in terms of section 11(o) on a
section 24M transaction (where unquantified amounts are involved – section 20B(1)). The suspended
section 11(o) loss will be offset against future payments (section 20B(2)) and will only be realised once all
payments are received. A recoupment in terms of section 8(4) will, however, be accounted for as soon as
it is realised.
The buyer will accumulate the base cost (or cost price) over time as and when amounts are quantified.
This poses a problem for the calculation of wear-and-tear. Wear-and-tear should be calculated taking into
account only quantified amounts and if an amount is received in a subsequent year after the asset was
already brought into use, wear-and-tear should be calculated on that amount retrospectively, taking into
account all the years for which the asset had been in use.
Work through the example, adapted from the Explanatory Memorandum on the Revenue Laws Amend-
ment Bill, 2004, below.
45 TAX4862/105/2023
Illustrative example
Company A (with a 31 March year-end) acquired a manufacturing machine in June 2018 at a cost of
R500 000 and immediately brought it into use. After depreciating the machine by R200 000 (s 12C at
40%), company A sells the machine to company B (also with a March year-end) on 31 March 2019. Under
the terms of the contract, company B must pay 10% of the value of the products produced by the machine
for 5 subsequent years. Assume the amounts eventually received are R190 000, R40 000, R250 000,
R280 000 and R240 000, starting on 31 March 2019.
Suggested solution
The special rules of section 24M apply because unquantified payments are involved.
Seller – Company A
N4 S 20B, in conjunction with s 24M, provides for the suspension of a loss made in terms of s 11(o)
on a s 24M transaction (s 20B(1)). The suspended loss will be offset against future payments (s
20B(2)) and will only be realised once all payments are received.
N5 R480 000 (R190 000 + R40 000 + R250 000) – R300 000 (tax value (N1)) = R180 000
N6 R760 000 (R480 000 + R280 000) limited to cost price = R500 000 – R300 000 = R200 000, but
R180 000 accounted for in 2021, therefore R20 000 recoupment (or R500 000 – R480 000).
Capital gain: R760 000 – R500 000 = R260 000 (or proceeds R560 000 (R760 000 – R200 000
(recoupment)) – base cost R300 000 (R500 000 – R200 000 (wear-and-tear)) = R260 000).
N7 Total s12C allowance claimed over the 5 years equals the total cost of R1 000 000.
46 TAX4862/105/2023
Seller – Company A
Buyer – Company B
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
R R R R R
Current 190 000 40 000 250 000 280 000 240 000
payments
Base cost: 190 000 230 000 480 000 760 000 1 000 000
(s 12C) N7 38 000 54 000 196 000 320 000 392 000
R190 000 38 000 38 000 38 000 38 000 38 000
(20%) (20%) (20%) (20%) (20%)
R40 000 16 000 8 000 8 000 8 000
(40%) (20%) (20%) (20%)
R250 000 150 000 50 000 50 000
(60%) (20%) (20%)
R280 000 224 000 56 000
(80%) (20%)
R240 000 240 000
(100%)
S 12C 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
allowance
(second-
hand)
Read through the Beancounter scenario again, and/or watch the cartoon under the Lessons
on myUnisa, and make a rough summary of what your solution would be now that you have
studied this learning unit. You should now be able to answer Bizzie Beancounter’s queries.
Share your solution on the myUnisa discussion forum, then refer to the outcomes (solution)
that will be made available on myUnisa on the Friday of your study week.
47 TAX4862/105/2023
This learning unit introduced you to the content in the Income Tax Act that is relevant to capital allowances
and recoupments together with the relevant law amendments. The table of reference under 8.4.2 was
provided to guide you through the work. Ensure that you have worked through (flagged and highlighted)
the sections referred in this table of reference under 8.4.2) in your Income Tax Act as well as in your
prescribed textbook, SILKE. We have provided a number of comprehensive summaries to assist and guide
you in deciding which capital allowances may be claimed. Remember to take a look at the additional
resources available for this learning unit on myUnisa and YouTube.
A total of 2 hours of your study time for day 4 has been allocated to LU 9. The other 5 hours
for today and 2 hours of tomorrow will be spent on LU 10.
Topic Minutes
Trading stock (LU 9) 120
Interest-bearing instruments, foreign exchange differences and transfer
420
pricing and tax morality, strategy and risk management (LU 10)
Total hours (9 hours) 540
The above time allocation is an indication only. The amount of time you need to spend on
each topic will be greatly influenced by the knowledge you already have from undergraduate
and previous postgraduate studies. You should therefore adapt the time allocation wherever
necessary to suit your level of prior knowledge.
9.1 BACKGROUND
Learning unit 9 covers trading stock (sections 22 and 23F), which has an impact on almost all the elements
of the tax framework. Section 9C is also dealt with in learning unit 9.
TAX FRAMEWORK
The topics covered in this learning unit fit into the tax framework as follows:
GROSS INCOME (s 1)
LESS: Exempt income (ss 10 and 10A to 10C)
= INCOME
LESS: Deductions and allowances (ss 11 – 24P, excluding s 18A & s 20)
LESS: Assessed loss brought forward (s 20)
ADD: Amounts to be included in taxable income including TAXABLE CAPITAL GAINS
LESS: Qualifying donations (s 18A)
= TAXABLE INCOME
UNGC principle 10 states that businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including
extortion and bribery. The definition of corruption includes dishonest or fraudulent conduct. Tax evasion
would fall within the ambit of corruption. There are various tax avoidance and tax evasion schemes that
relate to trading stock, for example trading stock that is acquired during the year but then remains
undelivered at the end of the year. Taxpayers then exclude the undelivered trading stock from closing
stock, resulting in taxpayers only deducting acquisition costs of trading stock under section 11(a) without
including the ‘balancing amount’ in gross income as closing stock. Tax legislation also includes various
anti-avoidance provisions to work against corruption, a good example being the anti-avoidance provisions
relating to trading stock contained in section 23F (see 9.6.3 below).
The most important outcome, however, is that you should be able to apply
your knowledge in practical case studies and in integrated questions (to
calculate and discuss) similar to those provided in sections B and C of this
tutorial letter by using critical thinking.
Before you start studying the detailed provisions of trading stock, read the following scenario
relating to the Beancounter family, and/or watch the cartoon posted under Lessons on
myUnisa. As you study the applicable sections in the Income Tax Act, identify areas of
concern that should be brought to the attention of the Beancounter family. Refer back to
TL102/2023, TL103/2023 and TL104/2023 for background information on the Beancounter
Family.
Remember that Bizzie is trading as a sole trader. She does the books for her business herself on a
program called Chinese Books.
Bizzie began selling organic laundry detergent, in January 2023, which she purchases wholesale from
Naturally Clean (Pty) Ltd, a VAT vendor (all amounts exclude VAT).
50 TAX4862/105/2023
She has approached you to help her calculate and explain the effect on her taxable income of the following
transactions:
a) Trading stock (organic laundry detergent) with a cost of R500 was removed by Bizzie for private use.
The market value of the trading stock on the date it was removed and used was R900.
b) Trading stock (organic laundry detergent) with a cost of R400 was used by Bizzie in the dry-cleaning
business (trade purposes). The market value of the trading stock on the date it was used was R750.
c) Trading stock (organic laundry detergent) with a cost of R1 000 was donated to a qualified public
benefit organisation (PBO) and a valid s 18A receipt was obtained. The market value of the trading
stock on the date it was donated was R1 500.
SILKE example 14.5 adapted
Discussion activity
Before attempting to help Bizzie with her query, work through and master learning unit 9.
Only then will you be ready to identify areas of concern that should be brought to the
attention of the Beancounter family. The outcomes (solution) for the Beancounter scenario
will be made available on myUnisa during your study week for this learning unit. You need
to review these outcomes to improve your own understanding of the tax principles involved.
We provide you with a Table of Reference which contains the references to the paragraphs in SILKE,
together with the references to the additional notes provided (if any) in this tutorial letter, as well as the
references to all the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act which you must study in this learning unit.
Refer to the study approach that we recommend in paragraph 7.4.1 in this tutorial letter.
The following table contains references to the paragraphs in SILKE, the additional notes in this tutorial
letter and all the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act that you must study in this learning unit, as well
as an indication of whether a specific section is examinable or not. Download the relevant interpretation
notes from the following link:
http://www.sars.gov.za/legal-counsel/legal-advisory/interpretation-notes/
Reference Reference
to the Reference to notes in
Topics Examinable
Income to SILKE TL
Tax Act
DAY 5 (2 hours)
Trading stock (120 minutes)
s1 Trading stock and deemed trading stock 14.1 & 4.13 9.6.1 Yes
Definitions
- Trading stock
- Gross income par (jA)
Reference Reference
to the Reference to notes in
Topics Examinable
Income to SILKE TL
Tax Act
- Opening stock 14.5
- Cost price of trading stock 14.6
- Trading stock for no consideration
- Trading stock distributed as a dividend
in specie
Paragraphs in SILKE that you may ignore because they deal with sections that are excluded from the
syllabus are as indicated in the above table.
52 TAX4862/105/2023
There are no new law amendments promulgated in the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022 that
are applicable to trading stock.
If the intended use of an asset is changed from a capital asset to trading stock, the taxpayer is deemed
to have disposed of the asset at market value for the purpose of calculating the recoupment in terms of
section 8(4)(k). That person is deemed to have disposed of the asset at its market value at that stage for
CGT (par 12(1) and 12(2)(c) of the Eighth Schedule). At the same time the taxpayer is deemed to have
reacquired the asset as part of trading stock at the same market value. This value will then be deductible
as the cost of the trading stock (as part of opening stock - section 22(3)(a)(ii)).
Illustrative example
If a taxpayer has a capital asset with a cost price of R6 000 and he changes his intention and it becomes
part of his trading stock when the market value of the asset is R10 000, it will be a deemed disposal for
CGT. The taxpayer will realise a capital gain of R4 000 (R10 000 proceeds less R6 000 base cost). He
will be able to claim a deduction for normal tax purposes equal to the market value (deemed to have
acquired the asset at current market value) of the trading stock, i.e. R10 000 (as part of opening stock).
Refer to the Natal Estates case in TL102.
If the intended use of an asset changes from trading stock to a capital asset, a deemed disposal of the
trading stock for a consideration equal to market value takes place (section 22(8)). The amount will be
included in income as a recoupment for normal tax purposes. Since it is now a capital asset, the base
cost of the asset for CGT will be the amount (market value) included in the taxpayer’s income for normal
tax purposes.
53 TAX4862/105/2023
Illustrative example
If a taxpayer purchased trading stock for R6 000 and his intention changed to using it as a capital asset
when the market value was R10 000, the taxpayer will have opening stock of R6 000 as a deduction and
income of R10 000. The taxpayer will be taxed on R4 000. His base cost for the capital asset will be
R10 000 (value included in income – market value). If the taxpayer in the future decides to sell the asset
for R18 000, he will realise a capital gain of R8 000 (proceeds of R18 000 less base cost of R10 000).
Note that if an asset manufactured by a taxpayer is subsequently used as a capital asset by the taxpayer,
it will continue to be regarded as trading stock and there will be no change in use; thus no recoupment
under section 22(8) will arise. (Review par (jA) of the gross income definition (SILKE 4.13), as well as the
definition of trading stock.) Par (jA) includes in gross income any amount received by or accrued to a
person in respect of the disposal of any asset manufactured, produced, constructed or assembled by
the person, which is similar to any trading stock manufactured, produced, constructed or assembled by
that person. For example, par (jA) will be applicable to a car manufacturer that sells cars, but uses some
of the cars for its employees as company cars. The receipt or accrual must be included in gross income
when the cars are sold, but will remain trading stock until sold (therefore section 22 will apply and the cars
will not be treated as capital assets when transferred from stock to company cars; no recoupment will be
accounted for). Proviso (d) to section 22(8) ensures that because this trading stock will already be
included in income under par (jA) of the gross income definition, it is not also included as a recoupment
in terms of section 22(8).
9.6.2 Trading stock applied for purposes other than trade (section 22(8) and SILKE par 14.6)
Section 22(8) seems to be a problem area for some students and we will therefore deal with it here. The
application of the section can be illustrated as follows:
Utilised as follows:
1.
NOTE
In our opinion, private or domestic consumption can only pertain to individuals
and not companies.
2. If the trading stock is used or consumed in the carrying on of the taxpayer’s trade,
the same amount will also be allowed as a deduction as deemed expenditure
incurred, apart from a recoupment under this section. If a second-hand car dealer
utilises a car from trading stock for deliveries, there will be a recoupment of market
value and the market value will then be used to determine the cost of the vehicle to
claim a wear-and-tear allowance.
3. Remember that if a manufactured asset is subsequently used as a capital asset, it
will continue to be trading stock and there will be no recoupment under this section
(see par (jA) of the gross income definition, as well as the definition of trading stock
and also the discussion in note 9.6.1 above).
4. In terms of section 23C, cost for purposes of income tax will exclude VAT if input
tax could be claimed. Therefore, the trading stock will be reflected net of VAT. If
trading stock is dealt with in terms of section 22(8), in most cases, a VAT adjustment
will have to be made by a VAT vendor in terms of section 18(1) of the VAT Act.
Three anti-avoidance provisions were introduced into legislation to counter schemes by taxpayers to
deduct only the acquisition costs but not include a ‘balancing amount’ in taxable income as closing stock.
S23F(1) limits the deduction for acquired stock (under s 11(a)) in the following circumstances:
- Trading stock which was neither disposed of (no proceeds included in gross income in terms of
sales) by the taxpayer nor held by the taxpayer at the end of the year (no amount is included in
taxable income in terms of closing stock (i.e. goods in transit)
The deduction for trading stock acquired will only be allowed in the first year in which
The deduction is limited to the extent that payment has been received for stock disposed of (s 23F(1)).
The second and third anti-avoidance provisions (sections 23F(2) and (3)) are excluded from the syllabus.
Section 9C was introduced into the Income Tax Act to provide greater clarity on the capital or revenue
treatment of share transactions. This section applies to the disposal of equity shares (previously
“qualifying shares”) and deems the receipt arising on the disposal to be capital in nature. The equity share
must have been held by the taxpayer for a continuous period of at least three years prior to disposal. An
“equity share” includes a participatory interest in certain collective investment schemes (including a hedge
fund investment scheme) and a hybrid equity instrument as defined in section 8E (section 8E is excluded
from your syllabus).
The taxpayer need not make an election in this regard; provided such equity shares have been held for
at least three years prior to disposal, the proceeds will be capital in nature, even if that person is a share
dealer.
55 TAX4862/105/2023
We will cover share dealers (SILKE 14.11) in TL107 and we will highlight only the trading stock related
issues in this tutorial letter.
It is important to understand that if a taxpayer speculates in shares (i.e. a share dealer), these shares will
be treated as trading stock. Section 22 will therefore be applicable to a share dealer in the same way as
to any other taxpayer holding trading stock.
• All financial instruments included in closing stock must be valued at cost, regardless of the nature
of the holder (section 22(1)).
• Special valuation rules have also been introduced to establish the cost price of any shares held
directly by a resident in a controlled foreign company (CFC) (section 22(3)(a)(iii)). THIS DOES NOT
FORM PART OF THE SYLLABUS.
• If capitalisation shares, any options or any other right to acquire shares in any company are acquired
by a share dealer (as part of trading stock) for no value, sections 22(4) and 40C state that these
shares, options or rights will have no value.
Read through the Beancounter scenario again, and/or watch the cartoon under the Lessons
on myUnisa, and make a rough summary of what your solution would be now that you have
studied this learning unit. You should now be able to answer Bizzie Beancounter’s queries.
Share your solution on the myUnisa discussion forum, then refer to the outcomes (solution)
that will be made available on myUnisa on the Friday of your study week.
This learning unit introduced you to the content in the Income Tax Act that is relevant to trading stock.
The table of reference under 9.4.2 was provided to guide you through the work. We illustrated the
application of section 22(8) under 9.6.2 to help you to better understand the application of the section.
Ensure that you have worked through (flagged and highlighted) the sections referred to in learning unit 9
(refer to 9.4.2) in your Income Tax Act as well as in your prescribed textbook, SILKE. Remember to take
a look at the additional resources available for this learning unit on myUnisa and YouTube.
A total of 7 hours of your study time for this week has been allocated to LU 10.
Topic Minutes
Interest-bearing instruments 75
Foreign exchange (except for example 15.7 in SILKE par 15.3.4.1) 75
Example 15.7 in SILKE par 15.3.4.1 30
Comprehensive example 15.16 in SILKE par 15.11 60
International transactions (transfer pricing) 60
Tax morality, strategy and risk management in SILKE chapter 34 120
Total (7 hours) 420
The above time allocation is an indication only. The amount of time you need to spend on
each topic will be greatly influenced by the knowledge you already have from
undergraduate and previous postgraduate studies. You should therefore adapt the time
allocation wherever necessary to suit your level of prior knowledge.
10.1 BACKGROUND
Learning unit 10 covers tax payable in respect of international transactions to be based on the arm’s
length principle (transfer pricing) (section 31), foreign exchange gains and losses (section 24I), interest-
bearing instruments (or interest accrued and incurred) (section 24J) and tax morality, strategy and risk
management.. Interest accrued and incurred and foreign exchange gains and losses impact on both gross
income and deductions in the tax framework.
57 TAX4862/105/2023
The topics covered in this learning unit fit into the tax framework as follows:
TAX FRAMEWORK
GROSS INCOME (s 1)
LESS: Exempt income (ss 10, 10A to 10C)
= INCOME
LESS: Deductions and allowances (ss 11 – 24P, excluding s 18A & s 20)
LESS: Assessed loss brought forward (s 20)
ADD: Amounts to be included in taxable income including TAXABLE CAPITAL GAINS
LESS: Qualifying donations (s 18A)
= TAXABLE INCOME
UNGC principle 10 states that businesses should work against corruption in all its forms, including
extortion and bribery. The definition of corruption includes dishonest or fraudulent conduct. Tax evasion
would fall within the ambit of corruption. UNGC principle 10 encourages entities to find a balance between
the social obligation to pay taxes and tax planning, in order to minimise the ‘cost’ of these taxes for an
entity within the ambit of the law. Situations may arise where entities act with an intent to evade tax (for
example entities with multi-nationals may purposely shift profits into low-tax jurisdictions), so it is important
to take note of UNGC principle 10 when studying this learning unit.
After studying LU 10, you should be able to achieve the following outcomes:
• Identify and explain whether a financial arrangement is an instrument and
calculate the interest in respect of instruments in terms of s 24J.
• Identify and explain whether interest received by a taxpayer should be
included in gross income.
• Identify and explain whether a taxpayer can deduct an amount of interest
incurred.
• Identify whether a debt instrument is a hybrid debt instrument and explain
the implications.
• Apply and explain the general and specific translation rules in respect of
foreign exchange differences.
• Discuss and calculate when an amount should be included or deducted
from taxable income in respect of foreign exchange differences.
• Apply deferral rules in respect of exchange differences, if applicable.
• Apply anti-avoidance rules in respect of exchange differences.
• Identify, explain and calculate the tax treatment of foreign exchange
differences on transactions with connected persons and persons forming
part of the same group of companies.
• Apply the rules of par 43 of the Eighth Schedule in tax calculations.
• Explain the basic principles in respect of transfer pricing.
• Identify and explain whether a transaction is subject to transfer pricing
requirements and apply the transfer pricing rules to make any necessary
adjustments if applicable.
• Understand and discuss the social compact between the government and
the citizens.
• Discuss and apply the moral and legal responsibilities of the taxpayer.
58 TAX4862/105/2023
• Identify and discuss tax risks of the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s strategy
to manage his/her/its tax risks.
The most important outcome, however, is that you should be able to apply
your knowledge in practical case studies and in integrated questions (to
calculate and discuss) similar to those provided in sections B and C of this
tutorial letter by using critical thinking.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED IN LEARNING UNIT 10
CIF Cost-insurance-freight
FCOC Foreign currency option contract
FEC Forward exchange contract
FOB Free on board
Before you start studying the detailed provisions of interest-bearing instruments, foreign
exchange differences and transfer pricing, read the following scenario relating to the
Beancounter family, and/or watch the cartoon posted under Lessons on myUnisa. As you
study the applicable sections in the Income Tax Act, identify areas of concern that should be
brought to the attention of the Beancounter family. Refer back to TL102/2023, TL103/2023
and TL104/2023 for background information on the Beancounter Family.
Remember that Bizzie is trading as a sole trader (she will therefore have a February year-end). Bizzie
only started trading on 15 May 2022 due to an unforeseen delay in obtaining an overdraft facility from her
bank. She does the books of her business herself on a program called Chinese Books. She has
approached you to assist her with the tax treatment (especially the conversion of the euro (€) amounts to
Rand) of the following transaction:
Bizzie placed an order for the importation of two dry-cleaning machines (which will be used in a process
of manufacturing) from Europe during January 2023 and hoped that she would receive them before
1 March 2023. One is a second-hand dry-cleaning machine and the other a new machine. The machines
were only shipped FOB on 1 June 2023 and only arrived in the Republic two weeks later. The overseas
creditor was settled in euros (€) one month after the machines arrived in the Republic. No forward cover
was taken out. The machines were brought into use immediately. (Ignore any VAT implications.)
Discussion activity
Before attempting to help Bizzie with her query, work through and master learning unit 10.
Only then will you be ready to identify areas of concern that should be brought to the
attention of the Beancounter family. The outcomes (solution) for the Beancounter scenario
will be made available on myUnisa during your study week for this learning unit. You need
to review these outcomes to improve your own understanding of the tax principles involved.
59 TAX4862/105/2023
We provide you with a Table of Reference which contains the references to the paragraphs in SILKE,
together with the references to the additional notes provided (if any) in this tutorial letter, as well as the
references to all the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act which you should study in this learning unit.
Refer to the study approach that we recommend in paragraph 7.4.1 in this tutorial letter.
The following table contains references to the paragraphs in SILKE, the additional notes in this tutorial
letter and all the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act that you must study in this learning unit, as well
as an indication of whether a specific section is examinable or not. Download the relevant interpretation
notes from the following link:
http://www.sars.gov.za/legal-counsel/legal-advisory/interpretation-notes/
Note that no case law in respect of learning unit 10 is included in TL102, which means that
you don’t have to study any case law for this learning unit. Remember, case law mentioned
in SILKE which is NOT dealt with in TL102 (highlighted in grey in the textbook) may be
ignored.
Start at the beginning of the Table of reference and work your way down, keeping in mind the study
approach as set out in par 10.4.1 above.
Reference
Reference
to the Reference to
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income SILKE
TL105
Tax Act
DAY 5 (5 hours)
Interest-bearing instruments (Incurral and accrual of interest) (75 minutes)
s 24J(1), Common principles that apply to 10.6 Yes
s 24J(5) & lenders and borrowers 16.1 –
24J(10) Section 24J(1), (2), (3), (5) & (10) 16.2.1.3,
Reference
Reference
to the Reference to
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income SILKE
TL105
Tax Act
(Excluding section 24J(3A), (4), (4A),
(5A), (6) to (9A) and (12))
Timing provisions of s 24J: Alternative
16.2.1.4 Read
methods
s 24J(4)
Transfer or disposal of instruments 16.2.1.5 No
&(4A)
Lender perspective: Taxability of interest
s 24J(3) 16.2.2 Yes
received or accrued
Borrower perspective: Deductibility of 16.2.3 to
s 24J(2) Yes
interest incurred 16.2.3.3
Other
s 24O Incurral and accrual in terms of certain 16.2.3.4 Yes
debts deemed to be in production of
income
Excluding section 24O(5) No
Interest incurred on loans to pay 16.2.3.5 Yes
dividends
s 23M Interest paid to persons not subject to tax 16.2.4 to No
16.2.4.1
s 23N Debt used in acquisition and reorgani- 16.2.4.2 No
sation transactions
s 24JA Sharia-compliant financing arrangements 16.2.5 No
Interest-free or low-interest debt 16.2.6 Yes
Equity instruments 16.3 to 16.3.2 Yes
Hybrid instruments 16.4 (ignore Yes
any reference
to ss 8E, 8EA
& 8FA)
s 8E & 8EA Hybrid instruments 16.4.1 to No
16.4.1.2
s 8F Debt instruments with equity 16.4.2 & 10.5 Yes
characteristics 16.4.2.1
(insurance, REIT and third-party backed (ignore any
instruments excluded) reference to
insurance,
REIT, third-
party backed
instruments
and s 8FA)
s 8FA Hybrid interest 16.4.2.2 No
s 24K Derivative instruments and interest rate 16.5 & 16.5.1 No
agreements
s 24L Option contracts 16.5.2 No
s 24JB & Financial institutions and authorised users 16.6 No
11(jA)
Foreign exchange (75 minutes)
Overview 15.1 & 15.2 10.7.1 & Yes
10.7.5
s1 Definitions: 15.2.1 Yes
Average exchange rate
Spot rate
61 TAX4862/105/2023
Reference
Reference
to the Reference to
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income SILKE
TL105
Tax Act
s 25D(1), General translation rules, excluding the 15.2.2 10.7.1 Yes
(2) & (3) last two rows of the table on page 534 of
SILKE and notes 3, 5 and 6.
Reference
Reference
to the Reference to
Topics to notes in Examinable
Income SILKE
TL105
Tax Act
par 43A Dividends treated as proceeds on disposal No
(8th of shares
Schedule)
par 43B Base cost of assets of controlled foreign No
(8th companies
Schedule)
Cryptocurrency 15.9 Yes
Exchange control regulations 15.10 No
DAY 5 (3 hours)
Example 15.7 (30 minutes)
DAY 6 (2 hours)
Tax morality, strategy and risk management (120 minutes)
Overview 34.1 Yes
Moral and legal responsibilities of taxpayers 34.2 Yes
General tax risk management strategy 34.3 Yes
Specific tax related risks 34.4 Yes
• Operation risk 34.4.1 Yes
• Compliance risk 34.4.2 Yes
• Tax uncertainty or interpretation risk 34.4.3 Yes
• Reputation risk 34.4.4 Yes
63 TAX4862/105/2023
10.4.3 Paragraphs and parts of paragraphs in SILKE which you may ignore
Refer to the table provided above for any paragraphs in SILKE that may be ignored. You may ignore any
parts of the paragraphs in SILKE that were indicated in the table above which refer to international
headquarter companies, international shipping and domestic treasury management companies or CFCs
in this learning unit as they deal with sections which are excluded from the syllabus.
There are no new law amendments promulgated in the Taxation Laws Amendment Act 20 of 2022 that
are applicable to LU 10. We repeat amendments from previous years which were enacted for your
convenience.
Note that the yield to maturity will not be provided in questions. You should be able to do
a basic calculation of the yield to maturity (internal rate of return). See SILKE par 16.2.1.3 in
this regard.
The following is a list of a few important issues, which might help you gain a better understanding of
section 24J:
• Section 24J prescribes not only the timing of the incurral or accrual of interest, but also the
deductibility or taxability of specific amounts incurred or accrued in terms of section 24J
(section 24J(2) and (3)). An amount taxed in terms of section 24J cannot be included in gross
income again in terms of any other section, and amounts that are deductible in terms of section 24J
cannot be deducted again in terms of another section. Therefore, double inclusions or deductions
are prohibited (section 24J(5)).
• The calculation of the amount of interest incurred in a specific year of assessment can be simplified
by using a time scale. This can best be explained by taking the information in example 16.2 in SILKE
and putting it on a time scale.
The use of this method will help you not only to establish your accrual periods over which interest
is incurred in terms of section 24J, but also to determine what portion of the accrual period falls
within the year of assessment that is included in your question. (In the example the interest
calculations were done manually, but you can also calculate the interest for each accrual period
using the “Amort” function on your HP or Sharp calculator, but remember to indicate exactly which
functions you have used on your calculator when answering questions in a test or an examination.)
• On the redemption or transfer of an instrument there can be CGT consequences, especially if the
instrument was held as an investment.
Note that the spot rate is to be used for companies with the conversion of foreign currency to rand. The
following exceptions apply:
• In the case of permanent establishments located outside the RSA and for purposes of
section 6quat, the average rate will still be used.
• The average rate is still available for use at the election of individuals and non-trading trusts (in other
words, natural persons and non-trading trusts have a choice between the average exchange rate
and spot rate). The rates will be provided to you if you are required to use these rates in a question.
This brings (in most cases) the tax treatment in line with the accounting treatment.
65 TAX4862/105/2023
NOTE
Note that the contract will have a nil value if the holder would have sustained a
loss had it/he exercised its/his right in terms of the contract on translation date
or date realised owing to an unfavourable intrinsic value (section 24I(1)). The
reason for this is that the holder would never exercise their option if they could
buy the foreign exchange cheaper in the market and could therefore never make
a loss.
10.7.3 Foreign exchange gains and losses relating to transactions between companies
in the same group or between connected persons - section 24I(10A)
Section 24I(10A) defers currency gains and losses in respect of unhedged debts between companies that
form part of the same group of companies and between connected persons. Exchange differences are
calculated by multiplying the exchange item (debt or loan) by the difference between the ruling exchange
rate on the last day of the year of assessment preceding the year of assessment in which the exchange
item is realised (or until the provisions of this deferral section no longer apply) and the ruling rate on
transaction date. The recognition of exchange differences is deferred until realisation or until the
provisions of this deferral section no longer apply.
In terms of section 24I(10A)(a) only foreign currency gains and losses which are realised or to which the
stipulations of the section no longer apply must be recognised.
67 TAX4862/105/2023
• the parties to the transaction form part of the same group of companies or are connected persons
(section 24I(10A)(a)(i)(aa)); and
• no FEC or FCOC has been entered into to serve as a hedge in respect of the debt
(section 24I(10A)(a)(i)(bb)); and
• the exchange item (or any portion thereof) should not represent a current asset or current
liability for IFRS reporting purposes (section 24I(10A)(a)(ii)(aa)); and
• the exchange item is not directly or indirectly funded by any debt owed to any person that does
not form part of the same group of companies nor a connected person in relation to that person
or the other party to the contractual provisions of that exchange item.
It was probably not the intention to include the words “or any portion thereof”, as this would
then only refer to long-term debts with no repayment terms as the following year’s repayment
amount will always in terms of IFRS become a current asset or current liability.
This issue with the short-term portion of this debt is excluded from the SAICA syllabus. You
should therefore, in the case of a long-term liability, ignore the fact that a portion of the long-
term loan will be reclassified as a current liability.
Refer in this instance also to the “Please Note arrows” in SILKE on page 549.
If a debt relating to an exchange item owing to a person is irrecoverable on realisation date, by reason of
becoming bad, or results in a loss (determined in the foreign currency on the realisation date) due to a
decline in the market value of the debt, the amount of any foreign exchange gain relating to that debt
which is or was included in the income of that person in the current or any previous year of assessment
should be deducted from the income of that person when calculating taxable income.
The opposite is also true. The amount of any foreign exchange loss, relating to that debt, which is or was
deducted from the person’s income in the current or any previous year of assessment should be included
in the income of that person when calculating that person’s taxable income.
10.7.5 Notes on the capital gains tax implications of foreign exchange transactions
(SILKE 15.1)
The aim of our discussion on section 24I in conjunction with the Eighth Schedule is to indicate the interaction
between section 24I (foreign exchange), section 25D (determination of taxable income in foreign currency)
and the CGT implications (Eighth Schedule). The interaction can best be explained by considering the
scenario of an import with a loan raised in foreign currency. Let’s assume a company taxpayer to which
section 24I(10A) (connected persons) does not apply.
68 TAX4862/105/2023
Every foreign currency transaction has two legs, namely the underlying asset (non-monetary item) and the
exchange (monetary) item. Each of these will have to be investigated:
Foreign currency
liability
(exchange item)
Section 24I
applicable?
YES NO
1. Section 24I will not be applicable if, for example, it is an individual who does not hold the
exchange item as part of his trading stock or a trust not carrying on a trade (section 24I(2)).
2. In some instances the average rate of exchange can be used (refer to section 25D(2), (3)
and 4), for example an individual or non-trading trust. (Remember, the average rate will
be provided to you in a question.)
3. If we assume the same scenario, except that a service was imported, the service would
have been recorded at the spot rate (section 25D) and claimed in terms of section 11(a).
4. An exchange gain or loss can only be included in or deducted from the taxable income
once an asset has been brought into use. This does not apply to trading stock. The
effect of this is that if an asset, being financed by a debt, is imported in the 2023 year
of assessment and only brought into use in the 2024 year of assessment, any realised
or unrealised exchange difference that arises in the 2023 year of assessment will only
be accounted for, for income tax purposes, in the 2024 year of assessment.
The main paragraph in the Eighth Schedule that affects foreign currency transactions is paragraph 43.
Paragraph 43 only deals with non-monetary assets acquired or disposed of in a foreign currency - refer to
the illustration above and work through the paragraphs below.
The application of paragraph 43 has been simplified. There are only two options for the translation of
capital gains denominated in foreign currency. These two options are contained in subparagraphs 43(1)
and 43(1A) and are, together with their effect, summarised in the table at the bottom of SILKE p 560 and
at the top of SILKE p 561 as well as in the paragraphs below.
Only two sets of capital gain currency rules are available when disposing of assets:
• The simplified method is available to a natural person or a non-trading trust that sells an asset
using foreign currency after having acquired the asset in the same foreign currency. The capital
gain or loss will be determined in the foreign currency and then be converted to rand by applying
the spot rate on the date of disposal or the average exchange rate for the year in which the disposal
took effect (paragraph 43(1)).
• In all other instances paragraph 43(1A) will apply (including where only the base cost or only the
proceeds amount is in a foreign currency or if both are, where deemed base cost for ceasing to be
a resident (section 9H of the Income Tax Act (see TL104, learning unit 5.5.1) needs to be
determined or if there is a debt reduction under par 12A). The currency gain or loss will be
determined in local currency and the base cost and/or proceeds will be translated to local currency
using spot rate or the average exchange rate for the year (use spot rate on date of acquisition or
disposal or the average rate of exchange for the year in which the acquisition or disposal took
place).
The stipulations of par 43(1A) seem to contradict section 25D whereby a company or trust may
only use the spot rate. It is not clear whether the legislator intended this anomaly, but as it
stands, the option to use the average rate in the case of companies and trusts when disposing
of non-monetary assets in foreign currency is in fact available.
70 TAX4862/105/2023
Please keep the important stipulations in subparagraphs 43(5) and (6) in mind:
• In terms of paragraph 43(5), where a person is DEEMED to have disposed of an asset and the
expenditure incurred to acquire that asset was determined in a foreign currency, the proceeds will
be determined in the same foreign currency.
• Paragraph 43(6) stipulates that where a person has adopted the market value as the valuation date
value of an asset as contemplated in paragraph 43, the market value must be determined in the
same currency in which the expenditure was incurred and translated to the local currency by
applying the spot rate on valuation date.
First read through the information provided in the question. You can assume that all goods were shipped
FOB on 1 June 2022. Ignore the solution in SILKE but work through the information provided below.
Remember that in terms of section 25D, the average rate may not be elected by a company.
A resident company should translate any amount received by or accrued to, or any expenditure
or loss incurred by the company in any currency other than the currency of the Republic (being
rand and cents) to the currency of the Republic at the spot rate on the date on which that amount
was received or accrued or the expenditure or loss was incurred. In terms of section 24J interest
accrues on and is incurred on a daily basis and should therefore be converted at the spot rate
at the end of each day of the accrual period until the date of payment.
In this example the company did not choose the average rate to translate the interest to the
currency of the Republic (rand). It would be a very complicated and difficult calculation to
translate the interest incurred on a daily basis. Therefore the average rate (section 24J) was
used to provide a more accurate amount than it would have been if the spot rate at year-end
had been used. As the interest was added to the loan, it became part of the loan
(monetary/exchange item) that had to be adjusted to spot rate at year-end, and therefore the
calculation of a foreign exchange difference on the interest part of the loan at year-end is
calculated as the difference between the average rate for the accrual period and the spot rate
at year-end.
71 TAX4862/105/2023
Only the portion related to inventory is recognised for normal tax purposes:
Trading stock: FC125 000/FC500 000 x R70 000 = R17 500 [recognised in terms of s24I(3)]
Machine: FC375 000/FC500 000 x R70 000 = R52 500 [deferred in terms of s 24I(7)]
5. Dr Interest on loan for machine (FC7 562 x R6,65 (average rate) 50 287
[FC375 000 x 8% x 92/365 days = FC7 562]
Dr Interest on loan for stock (FC2 521 x R6,65 (average rate) 16 765
[FC125 000 x 8% x 92/365 days = FC2 521]
Dr Exchange loss (balancing figure OR FC10 083 x
(R6,74 - R6,65) 907
Cr Loan (interest accrued) (FC10 083 x R6,74) 67 959
(spot on 31/8/2022)
Trading stock: FC125 000/FC500 000 x R1 994 = R499 [recognised in terms of s24I(3)]
Machine: FC375 000/FC500 000 x R1 994 = R1 496 [no longer deferred in terms of s 24I(7)]
SILKE
Example 15.7 TAX CALCULATION
Transfer pricing refers to transactions (between connected residents and non-residents) in which goods or
services are sold/transferred at a price that is not at arm’s length (not market value), resulting in the transfer
of income or expenses from one taxpayer (and one tax jurisdiction) to another.
• Section 31(2) and (3) primary and secondary transfer pricing adjustments
The effect of section 31(2) and (3) can best be explained by using a basic example:
Illustrative example
Company X, a resident company, sells trading stock with a cost price of R200 000 to its holding company
(a connected person), Company Y, a non-resident company managed and controlled in a country with a
10% income tax rate, for R220 000. The market value of the trading stock is R350 000. Company Y then
sells the trading stock to a foreign client at R350 000. Calculate the tax implications for both taxpayers on
the assumption that similar legislation applies in the foreign country.
Company X
R
Total tax liability for the group (R5 600 + R13 000) 18 600
The result of this transaction is that the bulk of the profit is carried over to the country with the lower tax
rate, resulting in tax savings for Company X, as well as the group as a whole. The same effect could have
been obtained if Company Y sold trading stock to Company X at a price higher than market value,
resulting in Company X getting a tax deduction for an expense, which is much higher than market value.
From this example it is clear how easy it would be for connected parties to manipulate prices, for the
reduction of tax liabilities. Let’s do the same example, this time applying section 31.
76 TAX4862/105/2023
Company X R
Section 31(2) adjustment is deemed a dividend in specie – R130 000 (section 31(3)(i)) 130 000
Dividends tax @ 20% on the above deemed dividend (R130 000 x 20%) 26 000
Company Y (tax payable in country of residence)
Same tax liability as before (see above) 13 000
Total tax liability for the group (R42 000 + R26 000 + R13 000) 81 000
The effect of section 31 is that the transaction is deemed to have been effected at arm’s length and the
selling price is deemed to be equal to open market value.
Section 31(3) now deems the primary adjustment of section 31(2) to be a deemed dividend in specie paid
by Company X and therefore creates a dividends tax liability for Company X in addition to the additional
income tax liability. In the case of a resident (other than a resident company), the primary adjustment of
section 31(2) is deemed to be a donation made by that resident and therefore creates a donations tax
liability for the resident at a rate of 20% or 25% (section 31(3)(ii)). Effectively the group is now “punished”
by paying double tax.
SILKE par 21.8.1.2 explains it clearly in the last paragraph under the heading “Secondary transfer pricing
adjustment (s 31(3)) on page 912.
Remember that the amount of the difference (calculation of either a donation or dividend in
specie) will be determined six months after the end of the year of assessment (section 31(3)).
Section 31(4): Paragraph (d)(v) of the definition of connected person in section 1 states that in relation to
a company, any other company will be a connected person to the company if
• that other company holds at least 20% of the equity shares or voting rights in the company and
• no holder of shares holds the majority voting rights in the company
Where section 31(2) is applicable in respect of granting any financial assistance (thin capitalisation – refer
to SILKE paragraph 21.8.2), the expression “and no holder of shares holds the majority voting rights in
the company” must be disregarded.
77 TAX4862/105/2023
NOTE
The definition of connected persons in section 31(4) only applies to thin capitalisation and NOT
to transfer pricing. For transfer pricing the definition of connected persons in section 1 applies.
Read through the Beancounter scenario again, and/or watch the cartoon under the Lessons
on myUnisa, and make a rough summary of what your solution would be. You should now
be able to answer Bizzie Beancounter’s queries now that you have studied this learning
unit. Share your solution on the myUnisa discussion forum, then refer to the outcomes
(solution) that will be made available on myUnisa on the Friday of your study week.
Work through the questions in sections B and C of this tutorial letter. We recommend that you
work through the allocated questions within the allocated time, then use the additional
questions provided as revision for tests and exams. This will help you assess your
knowledge. Revisit any areas that you have difficulty understanding.
____________________________________
END OF LEARNING UNIT 10
78 TAX4862/105/2023
Four (4) hours have been allocated to work through sections B and C. However, for your benefit
we provide you with more than 4 hours of questions. Furthermore, a few additional questions
will be uploaded on myUnisa during the revision week before the test.
Also, remember to critically read and understand the applicable case law
principles relating to this tutorial letter in TL102.
79 TAX4862/105/2023
NB! Remember that the tax rate of companies will change from 28% to 27%
from years of assessment ending on any date on or after 31 March 2023.
• identify if you had rectified the shortcomings identified in the previous sections
• demonstrate that you are competent to pass the formative assessments and
summative assessment relating to the topics you have covered so far.
SUMMARY OF QUESTIONS
Question TOPIC Marks/time
1 Loan between connected parties, section 19 and paragraphs 12A and 25/38
56(2) of the 8th Schedule
2 Sections 8(4), 8(5), 11(a), 11(cA), 11(gC), 11(e), 11(i), 11(j), 12C, 12H, 52/78
23F, 23H, 24I, VAT and CGT
3 Company income tax calculation (sections 8(4)(e), 11(i), 11(j), 12C, 36/54
13sex, 18A, 22(8), 24I and CGT) and discussion on the deductibility of
compensation and legal fees
4 Sections 1 (gross income paragraph (jA)), 11(a), 11(o), 12C, 12H, 22(2), 24/36
24C, 24M and CGT.
5 Sections 8(4)(e), 11(a), 11(c), 11(gB), 11(m), 11(o), 12E, 12H, 13(1), 42/63
13quin, 22(8), 24I, CGT and donations tax
6 Sections 1 (gross income paragraph (jA)), 8(4)(a), 11(a), 11(d), 11(e), 31/47
11(o), 19, 22(1), 22(2) and 22(8) and par 12A of the 8th Schedule
9 Section 9C 11/17
10 Sections 8(4)(a), 11(e), 11(g),11A, 12C, 12N, 13(1), 13(3), 13quin, 50/75
13sex, 23H, 24J and CGT and VAT
12 Sections 12C, 19, 24I, 24J, 25D, 31 and par 12A of the 8th Schedule 28/42
QUESTION 1 25 marks
LEX Ltd is a company that is incorporated in South Africa and is listed on the JSE. LEX Ltd holds all of
the issued share capital of RK (Pty) Ltd (referred to as RK) and of ART (Pty) Ltd (referred to as ART) and
has done so since the dates of incorporation. LEX, ART and RT are a group of companies as defined in
section 41 of the Income Tax Act (group of companies – see TL107).
All three companies are incorporated in South Africa as well as effectively managed in South Africa and
are regarded as residents for South African taxation purposes. The companies are all involved in the
motor manufacturing industry.
The three companies all have a February financial year-end and the pro forma statement of financial
position of RK and ART for the financial year ended 28 February 2023 are summarised below:
Current liabilities
Trade payables 4 845
Note:
1. The loan amounts to R125 million and comprises a capital element of R100 million and accrued
interest of R25 million. The loan has been impaired as a result of the financial position of RK. The
impairment led the company to claim the R25 million as a bad debt deduction in terms of section 11(i)
of the Income Tax Act in its year of assessment ended 28 February 2023.
81 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 1 (continued)
The loan was originally advanced during the financial year ended 28 February 2020 and was funded out
of surplus cash.
RK (PTY) LTD
STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2023
Note R million
ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment 400
Notes:
1. The company is in an assessed loss position for the year of assessment ended 28 February 2023
and is expected to have accumulated an assessed loss amounting to R55 million at the end of the
year of assessment ending 29 February 2024.
2. RK used the funds received from ART to fund the acquisition of land and buildings utilised for
purposes of its trade. Tax allowances have not been claimed on the buildings so acquired, as they
do not qualify for allowances in terms of the Income Tax Act. The R25 million interest expenditure
incurred on the loan has, however, been claimed as a deduction in terms of section 24J of the
Income Tax Act.
The financial director of LEX has proposed that ART waive its right to recover the R125 million loan due
from RK. He envisages that the transaction should be concluded in April 2023. The purpose of the
transaction would be to strengthen the balance sheet of RK as the company is experiencing severe cash
flow problems.
82 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 1 (continued)
REQUIRED: Marks
Discuss, with full supporting reasons and reference to relevant provisions of the Income Tax
Act, the potential taxation consequences arising from the proposed transaction from the
perspectives of both ART (Pty) Ltd and RK (Pty) Ltd. 25
- The income tax legislation for the 2024 year of assessment will remain the same as legis-
lation applicable to the 2023 year of assessment.
- The waiver of debt is not a scheme to avoid tax.
NOTE:
Your solution should deal with any consequences of the proposal, with regard to normal
tax (including capital gains tax (CGT)) and donations tax.
ART (PTY) LTD TO WAIVE ITS RIGHT TO RECOVER THE R125 MILLION LOAN DUE FROM
RK (PTY) LTD
General
• The debt benefit received by RK does not form part of the general definition of gross income
as it constitutes an amount of a capital nature. (1)
• The waiver of the debt is not part of a scheme to avoid tax. (1)
Recoupment provisions
• Section 19 of the Income Tax Act applies where
o a debt benefit in respect of debt owed by a person (1)
o arises due to a concession or compromise regarding that debt, and
o the amount of the debt was used, either directly or indirectly, to fund any expenditure for
which a deduction or allowance was granted in terms of the Income Tax Act
(section 19(2)).
• Section 19 does not, however, apply to a debt reduction that is a specific debt between group
companies (where the debtor company is dormant) (section 19(8)(d)). (1)
o RK, LEX and ART are a group of companies in terms of section 41 (LEX holds all the
shares of RK and ART). (The requirements of section 41 will be covered in TL107, refer
to note below) but (1)
o Based on the statement of financial position it is evident that RK was not dormant as it
carried on a trade in the previous year of assessment.
• No allowance or deduction was allowed for the R100 million loan since it was not used, either (1)
directly or indirectly, to fund any expenditure for which a deduction or allowance was granted
in terms of the Income Tax Act and therefore section 19 will not apply to the R100 million
and no recoupment will arise on the loan. (2)
• The interest expense of R25 million, however, was claimed as a deduction in terms of
section 24J of the Income Tax Act and section 19(5) will apply to this interest expense of
R25 million. In terms of section 19(5) the amount of the reduction of R25 million is deemed,
for the purposes of section 8(4)(a), to be an amount that has been recovered or recouped in (2)
the income of RK in its 2024 year of assessment.
CGT consequences
• The waiver of the loan account will be treated as a disposal for CGT purposes and the debt
relief provisions in terms of paragraph 12A of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act (1)
need to be considered from RK’s point of view (as debtor).
• In terms of paragraph 12A(6)(d) the provisions of paragraph 12A will not apply where the
person (debtor) and the creditor form part of the same group of companies as defined in (1)
section 41 and the debtor (RK) is a dormant company. Therefore in this case, as RK was
not dormant, the provisions of paragraph 12A will apply.
o None of the exclusions in terms of paragraph 12A(6) apply.
• The provisions of paragraph 12A further do not apply to the extent that the debt benefit (1)
(reduced or discharged) was used to fund expenditure in respect of which a deduction or
allowance was claimed. (1)
o The provisions of paragraph 12A would therefore not apply to the R25 million interest
expenditure (as it was claimed in terms of s 24J) already recouped in terms of
section 19(5) read with section 8(4)(a) of the Income Tax Act. (1)
84 TAX4862/105/2023
• The provisions of paragraph 12A would therefore apply to the R100 million capital portion of
the loan waived, because RK is not a dormant company in the group of companies. (1)
• There is thus a reduction of the base cost of the asset, that is R100 million (base cost of land
and buildings) – R100 million (debt benefit). (1)
General
• The company has already claimed the interest portion of the debt, i.e. R25 million, as a bad
debt deduction in terms of section 11(i) of the Income Tax Act and therefore cannot claim
this amount as a deduction again. (1)
• With regard to the potential claim of the R100 million capital portion as a deduction for
income tax purposes, the company would not be able to claim the amount as a deduction in
terms of section 11(i) as the amount was not previously included in the company’s income. (1)
• The company would not be able to claim the amount as a deduction in terms of section 11(a)
of the Income Tax Act either, as the company is not engaged in the trade of money lending.
In other words, the loss would be capital in nature and would not be permissible as a (1)
deduction.
CGT consequences
• The granting of the loan itself is a capital transaction and creates a capital asset for ART
(Pty) Ltd with a base cost of R100 million.
• From a CGT perspective, the waiver of the loan would be treated as a deemed disposal in (1)
terms of paragraph 11(1)(b) of the Eighth Schedule. The proceeds on the deemed disposal
amount to Rnil.
• ART would suffer a capital loss of R100 million (Rnil – R100 million) which may be deductible (1)
for CGT purposes. However, paragraph 56(1) (debt owed by a connected person) of the
Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act provides that where a creditor disposes of a claim
owed by a debtor, who is a connected person in relation to that creditor, that creditor must
disregard any capital loss determined as a result of that disposal.
• From an analysis of the facts, it is evident that ART and RK are subsidiaries of LEX. This (1)
would mean that ART and RK are connected persons (as defined in section 1 of the Income
Tax Act) in relation to LEX and that LEX is a connected person in relation to both subsidiary
companies. In addition, as both ART and RK are subsidiaries of the same holding company,
they would be regarded as connected persons in relation to one another.
• In applying the principles to the facts, it would appear that, as ART and RK are connected (1)
parties in relation to one another and, based on the provisions contained in paragraph 56(1)
of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act, the capital loss must be disregarded by ART.
• However, paragraph 56(2) of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act states that
paragraph 56(1) does not apply to the extent that
− RK reduced the base cost of the asset (land and buildings) under par 12A(3), or (1)
− the aggregate capital loss was reduced by virtue of par 12A(4) of the Eighth Schedule.
In this case RK reduced the base cost of the land and buildings and therefore ART would be
able to claim the R100 million as a capital loss for CGT purposes. (1)
85 TAX4862/105/2023
• Paragraph 56(2) states that paragraph 56(1) (disregards loss) will not apply if (inter alia) RK
has to include the R100 million write-off in gross income or has to apply it to reduce base
cost (paragraph 56(2)(c)). As RK will reduce the base cost by the R100 million,
paragraph 56(2)(c) is applicable.
Therefore paragraph 56(1) will NOT apply and ART will NOT disregard the capital loss.
(1)
• A further aspect that needs to be considered is a potential donations tax liability, because
the disposal by ART of the right to claim payment from RK might constitute a gratuitous (1)
disposal.
• However, as ART and RK form part of the same group of companies as defined in section 1
of the Income Tax Act, and they are both resident companies, section 56(1)(r) of the Income (1)
Tax Act would exempt the transaction from donations tax.
• The debt was also waived for commercial reasons for the benefit of the group, therefore it (1)
was not a gratuitous disposal.
• Therefore, there are no donations tax implications for RK. (1)
Total 31
Max 25
Note:
A “group of companies” definition is provided in section 41 and this will be covered in TL107. Therefore
for the purposes of this tutorial letter the question will explicitly state that the companies are a group of
companies in terms of section 41.
86 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 2 52 marks
Kiddies Cards (Pty) Ltd (referred to as Kiddies) is a company resident in South Africa. It designs and
manufactures cards that are collected by children and sells these cards to producers of breakfast cereals
and snack foods. Its financial year ends on the last day of February.
The issued ordinary share capital of Kiddies was held as follows throughout the 2023 financial year:
• 40% by Yugi Yuglyo, a resident of Armenia, a country with which South Africa does not have a double
tax agreement
• 30% by Jessy Ash, a resident of South Africa
• 20% by Tyson James, a resident of South Africa
• 10% by Max Pokemon, a resident of South Africa
These four holders of shares were also the sole directors of Kiddies during the 2023 financial year. Jessy
Ash is its managing director. Jessy Ash, Tyson James and Max Pokemon are all full-time employees and
executive directors of Kiddies and as such they receive salaries from the company. Yugi Yuglyo is a non-
executive director. All four directors also earn fees for attending directors’ meetings. The meetings are held
in South Africa. Directors’ salaries and fees are included in the amount stated under the heading “Salaries,
wages and benefits” in the detailed draft statement of comprehensive income.
(Note that all amounts reflected in the detailed draft statement of comprehensive income below and
in the notes that follow on it exclude VAT where appropriate unless specifically stated to the
contrary. Kiddies is a registered VAT vendor, making 100% taxable supplies.)
The detailed draft statement of comprehensive income of Kiddies for the year ended 28 February 2023 is
as follows:
Notes R R
Sales 16 250 000
Less: Cost of sales (12 500 000)
Opening stock (1 525 000)
Purchases 1 (11 575 000)
(13 100 000)
Less: Closing stock 1 600 000
Gross profit 3 750 000
Add: Sundry income 209 860
Dividend income 2 29 000
Capital profit on sale of local shares 3 80 000
Insurance settlement received 4 27 360
Prescribed debt 5 6 000
Profit on sale of machine A 11 67 500
3 959 860
Less: Expenditure (3 809 860)
Bad debt 6 (45 000)
Increase in provision for doubtful debt 7 (6 000)
Depreciation on motor vehicle 8 (37 050)
Depreciation on computer 9 (5 700)
Finance charges 10 (2 200)
Depreciation on machine A 11 (12 500)
Depreciation on machine B 11 (18 750)
Depreciation on other machinery and depreciable
assets 12 (86 250)
Rentals 13 (67 500)
Insurance premiums 14 (81 000)
Salaries, wages and benefits 15 (2 900 000)
Restraint of trade 16 (336 000)
87 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 2 (continued)
R
Provision for leave pay 17 (9 500)
Interest 18 (117 000)
Cost of trade mark written off 19 (40 000)
Other tax deductible administrative and marketing
expenses (45 410)
Comprehensive income (net profit) before tax 150 000
Additional notes
1. On 1 February 2023, Kiddies concluded a contract to import raw materials from an American supplier
at a cost of $24,000. The raw materials were shipped free on board on 22 February 2023 but had
not arrived in South Africa by 28 February 2023. Being concerned with the fluctuation of the
exchange rate, Kiddies took out a 2-month forward exchange contract on 1 February 2023 to cover
the settlement of the creditor. The creditor is to be settled on 31 March 2023. Kiddies did not, in its
2023 financial year, process any accounting entries relating to any of these transactions. Ruling
rates of exchange were as follows:
The average exchange rate for the year ended 28 February 2023 was $1 = R14,50
2. The following dividends accrued to Kiddies during the 2023 year of assessment:
R
• Dividends from resident companies operating in South Africa that accrued to
Kiddies during the period March 2022 to December 2022. The holding of shares 20 200
by Kiddies in these companies is less than 50% in all cases.
• A distribution from a real estate investment trust (REIT) (i.e. a listed company
that manages a portfolio of real estate properties). This distribution comprises a 8 800
dividend of R8 800.
Total 29 000
3. During the 2023 year of assessment Kiddies disposed of only the following capital assets:
• some of its share investments at a capital profit of R55 000 (as determined in accordance with
the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act); the related accounting profit is R80 000
• sale (trade-in) on 31 August 2022 of machine A (see note 11)
4. A road freight contractor had collected an order of cards (trading stock) from Kiddies’ premises for
delivery to a customer. On the way the road freight contractor’s delivery van, along with Kiddies’
trading stock, was stolen. On 15 February 2023 Kiddies received an insurance settlement from its
insurer of R27 360 for the stolen trading stock. This amount does not take into account any possible
VAT adjustment that may have to be made. Assume that no accounting entry was made to record
the sale of the trading stock or the write-off thereof as a result of the theft.
88 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 2 (continued)
5. During the 2020 year of assessment Kiddies had purchased raw materials for R15 000, excluding
VAT, from a manufacturer that was closing down. Kiddies paid R9 000 (being 60% of the purchase
consideration) on the date of delivery. For the following 3 years it tried unsuccessfully to pay the
40% balance of the purchase consideration (R6 000). Every cheque posted was returned with
“address no longer valid” endorsed on it. Because the debt has now prescribed, the amount owing
has been written back in its detailed draft statement of comprehensive income.
6. Bad debt written off of R45 000 consists of R18 000 for trade debtors and a loan of R27 000 to a
supplier who has been liquidated. This loan came about during the 2022 financial year of Kiddies,
when it lent R27 000 to a raw material supplier who was experiencing liquidity problems. The sup-
plier was liquidated on 1 December 2022 and Kiddies has been unable to recover any portion of the
loan.
7. Kiddies does not apply IFRS 9. Kiddies’ debtors age analysis as at 28 February 2023:
In the prior year the Commissioner for SARS allowed a doubtful debt allowance in terms of section
11(j) of the Income Tax Act equal to 25% of the year-end accounting provision (which consisted of
debts that were 60-days and 90-days outstanding). The prior year provision for doubtful debt
amounted to R44 000. As at 28 February 2023 the provision for doubtful debt was R50 000, an
increase of R6 000 from the balance as at 28 February 2022.
8. On 1 June 2022 a motor car used by Kiddies’ sales staff for visits to customers was purchased and
immediately brought into use. (This motor car meets the definition of a “motor car” provided in
section 1 of the VAT Act.) It cost R299 000 (R260 000 plus VAT of R39 000). Depreciation of
R37 050 has been provided for on this motor car. SARS’ Binding General Ruling No. 7 (or
Interpretation Note No. 47) provides for a 5-year write-off period for motor vehicles.
9. On 1 December 2020 Kiddies leased a computer from a financial institution under a 2-year finance
lease. Kiddies capitalised the financial lease for accounting purposes. It is treated as an instalment
credit agreement for VAT purposes. The computer cost the financial institution R19 665 (R17 100
plus VAT of R2 565). Total finance charges in terms of the lease amounted to R4 506 and the
monthly rental to R1 000. The final lease rental of R1 000 was paid on 30 November 2022. On
1 December 2022 the financial institution simply abandoned this computer to Kiddies without requi-
ring any further consideration by Kiddies. Ownership was therefore attained on 1 December 2022.
On this date its fair market value was R11 500 (R10 000 plus VAT of R1 500). Despite being 2 years
old, the computer was still in good working order and Kiddies indeed used it during the entire 2023
year of assessment. Depreciation of R5 700 has been provided for on the computer. SARS’ Binding
General Ruling No. 7 (or Interpretation Note No. 47) provides for a 3-year write-off period for
computers.
10. The finance charges of R2 200 accounted for in the 2023 draft statement of comprehensive income
concern the finance lease for the computer in note 9.
11. On 1 March 2021 Kiddies purchased a new machine (machine A) on a cash basis in an arm’s length
transaction for R100 000. Machine A was immediately brought into use in its process of
manufacture. On 31 August 2022 it traded this machine in for a more advanced manufacturing
machine (machine B). Machine B was purchased as a new machine on a cash basis in an arm’s
length transaction for R150 000. A trade-in price of R130 000 was obtained for machine A. On that
date machine A had a book value of R62 500. Machine B was immediately brought into use in its
process of manufacture. Kiddies will elect any option that is available to it to defer any of its tax
liability.
12. All other machinery and depreciable assets had a Rnil tax value on 1 March 2022.
89 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 2 (continued)
13. The rentals are paid monthly for the use of a warehouse leased by Kiddies for trade purposes.
14. Insurance premiums of R81 000 were incurred during the 2023 year of assessment. In addition,
Kiddies paid on 15 February 2022, insurance premiums of R88 750 covering the period 1 March 2023
to 29 February 2024, on the advice of its insurance broker who claimed that this early payment would
secure cheaper insurance. No portion of the advance insurance premium amount was expensed to its
statement of comprehensive income for the 2023 financial year.
15. Salaries, wages and benefits of R2 900 000 include directors’ salaries and fees. On 1 August 2022
Kiddies employed a learner (who is not disabled and who holds an NQF level 5 qualification) on a
full-time basis at a wage of R750 per week. (This learner was not previously employed by Kiddies.)
Kiddies entered into a 4-month, registered learnership agreement with the learner in the course of
its trade. The agreement commenced on 1 October 2022 and was completed on 31 January 2023.
The learnership agreement is registered with the relevant sector education and training authority
(SETA). Kiddies has complied with all the requirements of the Skills Development Act. The wages
paid to the learner and the levies paid to the relevant SETA are included in the salaries, wages and
benefits.
16. The restraint of trade payment of R336 000 was paid to a designer who had been employed by
Kiddies. She left its employ on 30 September 2022. The restraint of trade agreement is effective for
2 years commencing on 1 October 2022. The amount of the restraint of trade payment will be
included in the gross income of the designer.
17. The leave pay provision was increased by R9 500 for the 2022 financial year. As at
28 February 2023 the balance on the leave pay provision amounted to R54 500. Actual leave
payments made during the year have been expensed directly to salaries, wages and benefits.
18. Interest incurred during the 2023 financial year on the company’s business bank account (overdraft)
amounted to R117 000.
19. On 1 December 2022 Kiddies purchased outright the “Beyblade” trade mark from another card
manufacturer for R40 000. The acquisition gives Kiddies the exclusive right to market cards under
the Beyblade trade mark in South Africa.
20. In January 2022 Kiddies bought stock for R24 150 (R21 000 plus VAT of R3 150) from a local sup-
plier. Kiddies claimed an input tax credit of R3 150 for its tax period 1 December 2021 to
31 January 2022. However, because of quality problems, Kiddies paid the supplier only R19 320
(R16 800 plus VAT of R2 520) on 31 January 2022, refusing to settle the account until the quality
problems had been resolved. On 28 February 2023 an amount of R4 830 (R4 200 plus VAT of R630)
was still outstanding despite numerous letters of demand from the supplier. The amount was
reflected under creditors in the statement of financial position of Kiddies as at 28 February 2023. No
VAT adjustment that may be required has been reflected in the detailed draft statement of
comprehensive income of Kiddies for the 2023 financial year. None of this stock was on hand as at
28 February 2023.
Additional information
• Kiddies has neither an assessed loss nor an assessed capital loss to carry forward from its 2022
year of assessment.
REQUIRED: Marks
Calculate the normal tax liability of Kiddies Cards (Pty) Ltd for its 2023 year of assessment.
Show all workings and address all items. Your answer should start with the com-
prehensive income (net profit) before tax of R150 000. You can assume that Kiddies
Cards (Pty) Ltd is not a small business corporation. 52
(QE 2005 paper 2, question 2 - adapted)
90 TAX4862/105/2023
Unrealised s 24I loss on foreign creditor, $24,000 x (R14,60 – R14,55) (1 200) (1)
Unrealised s 24I gain on FEC, $24,000 x (R14,75 – R14,70) 1 200 (1)
10. Add back accounting finance charges on the lease of the computer equipment, as
full lease payment can be claimed, refer to note 9 (above) 2 200 (1)
11. Deduct accounting profit on sale of machine A (67 500) (1)
Add back depreciation on machine A 12 500 (1)
S 12C allowance on machine A, R100 000 x 20% (20 000) (1)
Add back depreciation on machine B 18 750 (1)
S 12C allowance on machine B, R150 000 x 40% (60 000) (1)
S 8(4)(a) recoupment on sale of machine A
Selling price R100 000 (R130 000 limited to cost)
Less: Tax value (R 40 000) (R100 000 - (R40k + R20k))
Recoupment R 60 000
Par 66 of the Eighth Schedule is applicable as proceeds exceed base cost (refer
to calculation of capital gains at the end of the question), and therefore the
recoupment is deferred in terms of s 8(4)(e), based on the allowance granted on
the new machine B, therefore R60 000 x 40% (R60 000/R150 000) = R24 000 24 000 (1)
12. Add back depreciation on other machinery and depreciable assets 86 250 (1)
13. Rentals, deductible under s 11(a), no adjustment required - (1)
14. Insurance premiums for the 2023 year of assessment, deductible under s 11(a)
This is a prepayment in terms of s 23H, as no benefit was received during 2023 - (1)
year of assessment, period of prepaid benefits > 6 months (proviso (aa) to s 23H),
but since the prepaid amount is less than R100 000, the amount is fully deductible
(proviso (bb) to s 23H). (Note that no information of any other prepayments was (88 750) (1)
provided in the question.)
92 TAX4862/105/2023
16. Add back restraint of trade payment, capital in nature 336 000 (1)
S 11(cA) deduction, lesser of
• one-third, R336 000/3 = R112 000 or (1)
• amount divided by number of years, R336 000/2 = R168 000 (112 000) (1)
17. Add back increase in leave pay provision, not deductible (s 23(e)), s 7B will 9 500 (1)
apply on actual payments made
18. Interest deductible under s 11(a) (not s 24J, as an overdraft is payable on - (1)
demand and therefore falls out of the scope of s 24J)
19. Add back deduction of trade mark, capital in nature 40 000 (1)
No s 11(gC) allowance available for the acquisition of trade marks - (1)
20. Cost of VAT adjustment for purchases not paid for within 12 months (s 22(3)(b)
of the VAT Act) (630) (1)
Other tax-deductible administrative and marketing expenses -
21. Taxable capital gain (see notes 3 and 11 above)
22. Capital gains on disposal of local shares (given) R55 000 (1)
Capital gain on disposal of machine A (R30 000 x 40%) R12 000
Proceeds
Selling price R130 000
Less: Recoupment (s 8(4)(e)) (R 60 000) R 70 000 (1)
Base cost
Cost price R100 000
Less: Allowances (s 12C) (R 60 000) (R 40 000) (1)
Capital gain R 30 000
23. Capital loss - loan to supplier (Proceeds - R0; base cost = R27 000) (1)
(R27 000)
Net capital gain R40 000
Inclusion rate of 80% 32 000 (1)
TAXABLE INCOME 234 016
Taxed at 28% 65 524 (1)
Total 55
Max 52
93 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 3 36 marks
Yum-Yum Babyfood Limited (referred to as Yum-Yum) is a resident company that manufactures organic
baby food (classified as a process of manufacture by SARS) that is sold both locally and internationally.
Yum-Yum has a June year-end and a 1-month tax (VAT) period. Yum-Yum is not an SBC and has no
majority holder of shares.
PART A 28 marks
Solly, the accountant of Yum-Yum, has done a preliminary tax calculation for the company for the year of
assessment ending 30 June 2023 and determined a taxable income of R37 250 000. Since Solly was
uncertain as to the correct tax treatment of the following items, these items have not yet been included
in the taxable income of R37 250 000. All amounts exclude VAT unless specifically stated otherwise.
1. Trading stock (cost of sales have been included correctly in the calculation of the taxable
income of R37 250 000, except for the cost of the imported berries in point 1.3, which has
not yet been included in the cost of sales).
1.1 On 1 August 2022 Yum-Yum donated non-perishable baby food to the Help a Child Foundation, a
qualifying PBO, and received a section 18A receipt. The cost of the stock donated was R15 000
and the company has a mark-up percentage of 150% on cost on all the products it sells.
1.2 Yum-Yum launched a new Yum-berry range of baby desserts during September 2022. For the
month of September, every customer buying a tin of Yum-Yum baby food received a tin of Yum-
berry dessert as a free gift. As a result, stock with a cost of R75 000 was given to customers as
promotional gifts (marketing).
1.3 Yum-Yum imports organically grown berries for its Yum-berry range from the USA. Yum-Yum
ordered berries, at a cost of $20,000 on 31 March 2023. The berries were shipped free on board
(FOB) on 15 April 2023 and were delivered at Yum-Yum’s premises on 15 May 2023. Import duties
of R8 715 were payable on the importation. A forward exchange contract (FEC) for a 3-month
period at a forward rate of R14,75 was entered into on 1 May 2023 to serve as a hedge against the
debt. The debt was settled on 31 July 2023. 70% of the imported berries were still on hand at year-
end.
QUESTION 3 (continued)
2. Fixed assets
2.1 On 1 December 2022, Yum-Yum bought 7 newly built flats in a residential building consisting of 12
flats, directly from a developer (a registered vendor), for R350 000 each (excluding VAT). All of
these residential units were rented out to employees of Yum-Yum, effective from 1 January 2023,
for R3 500 each per month.
2.2 On 1 January 2023, Yum-Yum sold one of its manufacturing machines, machine A, to a non-
connected company for R2 750 000. The machine (when purchased new on 31 March 2021) had
an original cost of R2 700 000 and tax allowances of R1 620 000 have been claimed until
30 June 2022 in terms of s 12C.
Machine A was immediately replaced by Machine B, which was purchased from Organic Baby
Drinks Limited, a subsidiary of Yum-Yum, for R3 500 000 when the market value was
R3 250 000. The machine was originally purchased by Organic Baby Drinks Limited for
R3 000 000 and tax allowances of R2 400 000 had been claimed by Organic Baby Drinks Limited
on the machine until the date of sale. Machine B will also be used by Yum-Yum in its process of
manufacturing.
3.1 Yum-Yum does not apply IFRS 9. In the 2022 year of assessment, the Commissioner allowed a
doubtful debt allowance of R15 000. Yum-Yum’s debtors age analysis as at 30 June 2023:
3.2 Bad debts of R65 000 were written off during 2023. Of this amount
REQUIRED: Marks
Calculate the normal tax liability of Yum-Yum Babyfood Limited (“Yum-Yum”) for the year of
assessment ending 30 June 2023. Assume that Yum-Yum wants to minimise its normal tax
liability for the 2023 year of assessment and will use any provision of the Income Tax Act
available to achieve this. Show all your workings. Indicate, with reasons, if an amount has
no tax implications and round off all amounts to the nearest rand. 28
95 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 3 (continued)
PART B 8 marks
Contrary to the results of all the previous research performed by Yum-Yum, one of Yum-Yum’s customers
(a 6-month-old baby) developed an allergic reaction to their organic butternut baby food. The baby had
to be hospitalised on 15 July 2023 and Yum-Yum paid, in terms of a court settlement, the hospital bills
amounting to R35 000, as well as the family’s legal expenses of R5 000.
REQUIRED: Marks
Discuss, with reference to case law and legislation, whether the R40 000 will be deductible in
the hands of Yum-Yum for tax purposes. 8
PART A 28 marks
R
Taxable income 37 250 000
1. Trading stock
1.1 Donation Recoupment at cost in terms of s 22(8)(C) – donation
in terms of s 18A (allowable deduction – see s 18A
later) 15 000 (1)
1.2 Yum-berry No adjustment, as applied for purposes of trade
promotion (marketing) no recoupment under s 22(8) - (1)
1.3 Berries imported Cost of sales (s 11(a)): (305 715) (2)
– s 24I ($20,000 x R14,85 (s 25D)) + R8 715
Foreign exchange differences (s 24I)
Debt:
$20,000 x (R14,85 – R14,60) - gain 5 000 (2)
FEC:
$20,000 x (R14,75 – R14,65) – loss (2 000) (2)
Closing stock (s 22(1)) (R305 715 x 70%) 214 001 (1)
2. Fixed assets
2.1 Residential Rentals received: R3 500 x 7 units x 6 months 147 000 (1)
units – s 13sex S 13sex allowance: R350 000 x 1.15 (include VAT as
exempt supply and no VAT claimable – s 12(1)(c) of
the VAT Act) = R402 500 (1)
R402 500 x 7 units x 5% x 55% (77 481) (2)
R R
2.2 Machines A and B Machine A:
– ss 12C, 8(4)(e) Purchase price = 2 700 000
and par 66 of Less:
Eighth Schedule Wear-and-tear (s 12C):
Previous – given (1 620 000)
20% x R2 700 000 (2023) (540 000) (540 000) (1)
Tax value 540 000
Less: Selling price limited to cost R2 700 000 (1)
R2 160 000
Machine B:
Therefore:
S 8(4)(e) recoupment on machine A [roll-over]:
R2 160 000 x 20% (same % as machine B) 432 000 (1)
Capital R
gain/loss Capital gain on machine A (point 2.2 above)
calculation But par 66 of Eighth Schedule applicable,
Thus: R50 000 x 20% = R10 000 (based on machine B) =
R10 000
Net capital gain included in taxable income at 80%
(R10 000 x 80% = R8 000) 8 000 (1)
Subtotal 36 445 805
1.1 Donation R15 000 (see point 1.1 above), but maximum deduction:
(s 18A) 10% of R36 445 805 = R3 644 581, but limited to
R15 000 (15 000) (1)
TAXABLE
INCOME 36 430 805
Tax liability @ 27% 9 836 317 (1)
Total 29
Max 28
PART B 8 marks
• The compensation of R35 000 paid will only be deductible if all the requirements of section 11(a) are
met. The compensation must be an expenditure or loss, actually incurred, during the year of assess-
ment, in the production of income and not of a capital nature. Furthermore, it must be laid out for the
purposes of trade (section 23(g)). (1)
• All of the requirements are met, except for “in the production of income” and “not of a capital nature”,
which need to be discussed further. (1)
• To determine whether the compensation paid was in the production of income, two questions must be
asked:
• What action gave rise to the expenditure? The production and sale of baby food gave rise to the
expenditure. (1)
• Is this action closely connected with the income-earning activities? (Is it a necessary concomitant
of the business?) The sale of baby food is closely connected to the income-earning activities. (1)
(Joffe & Co (Pty) Ltd v CIR (1946 AD) and Port Elizabeth Electric Tramway Co Ltd v CIR (1936
CPD))
The compensation paid was therefore expenditure incurred in the production of income. (1)
• In determining whether the expense is capital in nature, you must establish whether it is part of
• the cost of performing the income-earning operations (which it is in this case – being related to
products sold), or (1)
• the cost of establishing, improving or adding to the income-earning structure (1)
(New State Areas Ltd v CIR (1946 AD) & BPSA (Pty) Ltd v SARS (2007))
The compensation is not creating an enduring benefit and is a once-off expense, thus not of a capital
nature. (1)
• Since the compensation meets all the requirements of section 11(a) read with section 23(g), it will be
deductible. (1)
• The legal expenses of R5 000 will also be deductible under section 11(c) since it is not of a capital
nature (following the nature of the compensation paid) and the compensation to which it relates is
deductible under section 11(a) (section 11(c)(ii)). (1)
Total 10
Max 8
98 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 4 24 marks
Meat Made Easy Limited (MME) is a resident company that manufactures meat-cutting machines
(classified as a “process of manufacture” by SARS) used by hunters, farmers and butcheries in South
Africa and other African countries. The company also owns a game farm and ten butcheries. MME has
a December year-end and a one-month tax period for VAT purposes. MME is not a small business
corporation as defined.
The following transactions which have an effect on the calculation of MME’s taxable income for the 2023
year of assessment occurred in either the company’s 2022 or 2023 year of assessment. All amounts
exclude VAT, where applicable, unless specifically indicated otherwise:
1. On 1 April 2022 MME sold a machine that had been used in the company’s manufacturing process
to Please Eat Meat Limited, which has an April year-end. In terms of the agreement Please Eat Meat
Limited had to pay an amount of R180 000 on 1 April 2022 and thereafter 10% of the value of the
products produced by the machine during Please Eat Meat Limited’s 2023 year of assessment.
Please Eat Meat Limited paid MME R180 000 on 1 April 2022 and R350 000 on 1 April 2023.
MME acquired (and brought into use) the manufacturing machine that was sold to Please Eat Meat
Limited on 1 August 2021 as a new machine for R552 000 (including VAT).
2. On 15 November 2022 MME entered into a 9-month learnership agreement with Keba Skosana, a
disabled employee who holds an NQF level 7 qualification. The learnership agreement meets all the
requirements of section 12H. Keba successfully completed the learnership on 14 August 2023.
3. The cost of manufacturing a meat-cutting machine amounted to R12 080 for the 2023 year of
assessment and R10 800 for the 2022 year of assessment. MME has a mark-up percentage of 60%
on cost on all products sold. On 1 January 2023 MME had 180 machines in stock that were
manufactured during the 2022 year of assessment. During the 2023 year of assessment the
company manufactured 6 250 meat-cutting machines. The company uses the first-in-first-out (FIFO)
method when selling stock.
The following movements took place in respect of trading stock during the company’s 2023 year of
assessment:
• The company sold 5 580 meat-cutting machines to customers in South Africa. Sales took place
evenly throughout the year of assessment.
• On 1 October 2023 MME transferred eight meat-cutting machines to be used in the butcheries
owned and operated by the company. These machines will eventually be sold by MME as
second-hand machines.
4. On 1 December 2023 MME received a non-refundable deposit of R50 000 from Namibia Star
Hunters Limited, a company in Namibia, in terms of a contract for four specialised meat-cutting
machines. These machines are similar to the current machines manufactured by MME but in terms
of the contract, need to be adjusted for the fitting of specific electrical motors, chains and blades.
The company estimated that the cost of these machines will be R17 250 (including VAT) each. The
machines will be sold for R25 000 (excluding VAT) each. Manufacturing of these machines will
commence on 1 January 2023. On completion MME will deliver the machines to Namibia Star
Hunters Limited in Namibia.
99 TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 4 (continued)
REQUIRED: Marks
(i) Note 1 only
Calculate the amounts to be included or deducted in the calculation of Meat Made Easy
Limited’s taxable income in respect of note 1 for the company’s 2022 and 2023 years
of assessment. If any amount that you have calculated is not deductible or should not
be included in the calculation of the company’s taxable income, provide a reason or
reference to legislation.
You can assume that the company will elect any tax option available to reduce its 10
income tax payable in a specific year of assessment.
(ii) Notes 2 to 4
Calculate the amounts to be included or deducted in the calculation of the taxable
income of Meat Made Easy Limited for the company’s 2023 year of assessment in
respect of notes 2 to 4. Provide a reason or reference to legislation if any event (note
14
or part of a note) has no effect on the calculation of the company’s taxable income.
Assume that the Commissioner will allow the cost as a percentage of contract price as
the basis for calculating future costs in respect of contracts, where applicable.
TOTAL 24
(Unisa 2017 - adapted)
100 TAX4862/105/2023
(i) Note 1 R R
1. 2022:
480 000 (1)
Cost: R552 000 x 100/115 = R480 000
Allowances claimed (288 000)
Section 12C (2021) R480 000 x 40% (192 000) (1)
Section 12C (2022) R480 000 x 20% (96 000) (96 000) (1)
Tax value on 1 April 2022 192 000
Less: Selling price (amount received 1 April 2022) 180 000 (1)
Section 11(o) loss (R180 000 – R192 000 = (R12 000)) – not (12 000)
deductible in terms of section 20B (1)
read with section 24M, suspended until full consideration
received (1)
2023:
Selling price – received 350 000 (1)
Less: Tax value – fully deducted in 2022 - (1)
350 000
Less: Section 11(o) not claimed in 2022 (12 000) (1)
Recoupment BUT 338 000
Limited to section 12C allowances claimed 288 000 (1)
(R192 000 + R96 000 = R288 000)
ALTERNATIVE
Selling price – received (R180 000 + R350 000) 530 000 (2)
Less: Tax value – fully deducted in 2022 (192 000) (1)
Recoupment BUT 388 000
Limited to section 12C allowances claimed
R192 000+ R96 000 = R288 000) (1)
Capital gains
Proceeds (R350 000 + R180 000 – R288 000 (recoupment)) 242 000
Less: Base cost (R480 000 – R288 000 (section 12C
allowance claimed)) (192 000)
Capital gain 50 000 (1)
Include @ 80% (inclusion rate for companies) 40 000 (1)
Total 12
Max 10
101 TAX4862/105/2023
2. Annual allowance:
(R20 000 + R30 000) x 7/12 (29 167) (2)
Section 12H(2A)(a) & section12H(5A) and apportion in terms
of section 12H(2A)(b) only in respect of full months
On completion:
(R20 000 + R30 000) sections 12H(3A) & 12H(5A) (50 000) (1)
3. Opening stock (180 x R10 800 (section 22(2)) (1 944 000) (1)
Cost of production (6 250 x R12 080) (section 11(a)) (75 500 000) (77 444 000) (1)
QUESTION 5 42 marks
Megachef (Pty) Ltd (referred to as Megachef), a resident company, manufactures and sells premium
stainless steel kitchenware. This is classified as a process of manufacture by SARS. The company has
a 30 September year-end and is a registered VAT vendor. All amounts in the question exclude VAT (if
applicable), unless specifically stated otherwise.
Megachef started 10 years ago as the dream of the happily married couple Mr Salt and Mrs Pepper Chef
(who are married out of community of property). The company has, however, grown into a multimillion
rand business with a gross income of R12 500 000 and employed 16 full-time employees (including Salt
and Pepper) throughout the year of assessment. The shares are held in equal parts by Salt and Pepper,
who are also both directors of the company.
PART A 25 marks
The effect of the following transactions on Megachef’s 2023 year of assessment have not yet been taken
into account in the calculation of the taxable income of R8 450 670:
1. The following is a list of Megachef’s fixed assets and transactions relating to the fixed assets not yet
taken into account:
• Megachef ordered a new manufacturing machine (machine A) from a supplier in Germany for
€350,000 on 15 August 2022. Machine A was shipped free on board (FOB) on
1 September 2022 and was delivered at Megachef’s premises on 25 September 2022. The
correct amount of VAT was paid (and claimed as input tax) and import duties of R37 500 were
paid on importation. On 1 September 2022, Megachef entered into a 3-month forward exchange
contract (FEC) with Independent Bank Limited in order to hedge the full purchase price. The
machine was brought into use on 1 October 2022. The full payment for the machine was made
to the supplier on 30 November 2022.
QUESTION 5 (continued)
• Owing to Megachef’s rapid expansion, the company had to replace one of its mobile cranes
(crane A) with a more powerful one (crane B) for the packaging department. Crane A was
acquired new for R175 000 from an independent party on 15 June 2021 and immediately brought
into use. On 1 September 2022, crane A was sold for R182 000 to an independent party. Crane
B (new and unused) was purchased for R250 000 on the same day to replace crane A and was
immediately brought into use. Binding General Ruling No. 7 (or Interpretation Note No. 47)
allows for a 4-year write-off period on these mobile cranes, if applicable.
• During the last 6 months of 2019 a factory building and an office block were both erected by
Megachef at a cost of R1 500 000 and R650 000, respectively, and were both brought into use
on 1 January 2020.
2. During the 2023 year of assessment, an annuity of R5 000 was paid to Mrs Salad Dressing (aged 38),
a former employee who was instrumental in helping to set up the business but who decided to be a
stay-at-home mom after the birth of her twins during the 2022 year of assessment.
3. On 1 July 2023, Megachef registered a new patent for a newly designed kitchenware range under
the Patents Act 57 of 1978 and paid R2 800 for registration fees.
4. On 1 July 2022, Megachef entered into a 12-month learnership agreement with Ice Cream (not
disabled) who holds an NQF level 5 qualification. Ice Cream successfully completed the learnership
agreement on 30 June 2023. Ice Cream receives an annual salary of R50 000, which has already
been taken into account in the calculation of the company’s taxable income of R8 450 670.
5. Megachef has an assessed capital loss of R1 500 that the company brought forward from the 2022
year of assessment.
REQUIRED: Marks
Calculate the normal tax liability of Megachef (Pty) Ltd for its 2023 year of assessment.
Start your calculation with the taxable income of R8 450 670. Show all your calculations
and round off amounts to the nearest rand. Provide brief explanations to support your
calculations and clearly indicate nil effects (with a brief reason). Assume that the company
25
will qualify as an SBC and will elect any option available to minimise its tax liability.
104
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 5 (continued)
PART B 17 marks
Megachef (Pty) Ltd is one of the main sponsors of a reality cooking competition running for a 3-month
period (15 October 2023 to 15 January 2024). The sponsorship agreement (for which Megachef had to
pay its legal advisors R3 500 to draw up) stated the following:
• Megachef will supply all the kitchenware required by the contestants during the cooking competition.
Ownership of the kitchenware will be retained by Megachef during this period.
• Megachef’s logo and contact details will be advertised during and after every televised episode of
the show.
• All the kitchenware used by the contestants during the competition will be returned to Megachef at
the end of the competition, after which it will be donated to the Stellenbosch Children’s Orphanage
(not a registered PBO).
On 1 October 2023, kitchenware, with a cost price of R100 000 and a market value (excluding VAT) of
R150 000, was made available to the organisers of the competition.
On 31 January 2024, after the reality show was recorded, the kitchenware was checked by Salt and
Pepper before being donated to the children’s orphanage. They discovered that kitchenware with a cost
price of R3 750 (and an original market value (excluding VAT) of R5 625) had disappeared and that
kitchenware with a cost price of R2 250 (with an original market value (excluding VAT) of R3 375) had
been damaged beyond repair and could not be donated. The damaged kitchenware was sold as scrap
metal for R500 to a non-vendor, and this amount was then also donated to the children’s orphanage. The
remaining kitchenware, valued at R55 000 (market value (excluding VAT)) after being used in the
competition), was donated to the children’s orphanage that same afternoon. These were the only
donations that Megachef made during the 2024 year of assessment. Assume that donations made by
Megachef in prior years totalled R850 000.
REQUIRED: Marks
Discuss all the tax implications (except for VAT, which you can ignore) in respect of the
sponsorship agreement for Megachef (Pty) Ltd for its 2024 year of assessment. Your
discussion should refer to relevant legislation and also to case law, where applicable.
Substantiate your discussion with calculations.
Assume that the tax legislation for the 2024 year of assessment will remain the same as
legislation applicable to the 2023 year of assessment.
• Legal cost
• Kitchenware supplied for the competition
• Donation of kitchenware to Stellenbosch Children’s Orphanage
• Stock stolen
• Stock sold as scrap and proceeds donated
17
105
TAX4862/105/2023
PART A
Megachef (Pty) Ltd’s tax liability for the 2023 year of assessment
R
Taxable income 8 450 670
1 Fixed assets:
Machine A Purchase price (s 12E(1)) - capital:
imported – (€350,000 x R14,50 (s 25D)) + R37 500
ss 12E and 24I = R5 112 500 (2)
No s 12E allowance claimed during 2022 as only
brought into use on 1 October 2022, thus claim
100% under s 12E(1) in 2023 (5 112 500) (1)
Foreign exchange differences (s 24I)
All foreign exchange differences from 2022 would
have been deferred to 2023, since the asset was
only brought into use in 2023 (s 24I(7))
Debt:
2022: €350,000 x (R14,50 – R14,30) 70 000 (1½)
2023: €350,000 x (R13,70 – R14,30) 210 000 (1½)
FEC:
2022: €350,000 x (R14,60 – R14,56) 14 000 (1½)
2023: €350,000 x (R13,70 – R14,60) (315 000) (1½)
Crane B: R250 000 x 30% (2nd yr (2023): s 12E(1A)) (75 000) (1)
Therefore:
S 8(4)(e) recoupment on crane A:
R140 000 x 30% (same % as crane B) 42 000 (1)
4 Learnership Annual allowance: R40 000 x 9/12 (s 12H(2)(a)) (30 000) (1)
agreement – Completion allowance: R40 000 s 12H(3)) (40 000) (1)
s 12H
R
Capital gain/loss Capital gain on crane A (point 1 above)
calculation But par 66 of Eighth Schedule applicable, thus
R7 000 x 30% included (based on crane B) 2 100 (1)
Assessed capital loss brought forward from
the 2022 year of assessment (1 500) (1)
600
At 80% inclusion rate 480 480 (1)
TAXABLE INCOME 3 104 350
Tax liability = R57 698 + (27% x (R3 104 350 – R550 000))
= R57 698 + R689 675 747 373 (1)
(Apply SBC table – refer to par 8.5 in LU 8) Total 27
Max 25
107
TAX4862/105/2023
PART B
Tax implications of the sponsorship agreement
Legal cost
The provisions of section 11(c) will first be applied to the legal cost of R3 500 to establish if it will be
deductible under this section (section 23B(3)).
Section 11(c) is applicable to legal expenses actually incurred by the taxpayer during the year of
assessment in respect of any claim, dispute or action of law arising in the course of or by reason of the
ordinary operations undertaken by them in the carrying on of their trade.
The finalisation of the sponsorship agreement is not in respect of any claim, dispute or action of law and
as such section 11(c) will not be applicable. (1)
Section 11(a) will have to be applied.
For an amount to be deductible in terms of the general deduction formula, all of the following requirements
must be satisfied (i.e. section 11(a) read with section 23(g) of the Income Tax Act):
All of the requirements are met, but “in the production of income” and “not of a capital nature” need to be
discussed further. (1)
To determine whether the legal cost was in the production of income, two questions should be asked:
• What action gave rise to the expenditure? The finalisation of the sponsorship agreement gave rise
to the expenditure. (1)
• Is this action closely connected with the income-earning activities? (Is it a necessary concomitant
of the business?) The sponsorship is closely related to the income-earning activities, since it will
lead to advertising, which will inevitably increase sales and will give rise to income in the future. (1)
(Port Elizabeth Electric Tramway Co Ltd case or BP South Africa (Pty) Ltd case) (1)
The legal cost was therefore expenditure incurred in the production of income.
(Alternative: the act entailing the expenditure must be a “necessary/inevitable concomitant” of the
taxpayer’s trade) (Joffe & Co (Pty) Ltd case)
In determining whether the expense is capital in nature, you must establish whether it is part of
• the cost of performing the income-earning operations – legal cost will be part of the cost of performing
the income-earning operations, or (1)
• the cost of establishing, improving or adding to the income-earning structure – it is not creating an
enduring benefit and will not be capital in nature
(New State Areas Ltd case or Rand Mines (Mining & Services) Ltd case) (1)
108
TAX4862/105/2023
The legal cost paid is part of the cost of performing the income-earning operations and thus not of a
capital nature and will be allowed as a deduction under sections 11(a) and 23(g). (1)
Trading stock has been used for purposes other than the disposal in the ordinary course of business
(section 22(8)(b)(iv)), therefore proviso (d) to section 22(8) will be applicable – the assets supplied
represent trading stock manufactured and as such represent assets to which the provisions of paragraph
(jA) of the gross income definition in section 1 will be applicable – and no recoupment will be made under
the provisions of section 22(8). It will still be treated as part of trading stock. No adjustment for tax
purposes. (2)
Trading stock has been applied for the purposes of making a donation (s 22(8)(b)(i)) – note that
proviso (d) to section 22(8) will no longer be applicable, since it only applies to section 22(8)(b)(iv) – and
a recoupment at market value of R55 000 of the kitchenware supplied for the competition will be included
in the calculation of the taxable income of Megachef (Pty) Ltd. (Note that cost price is not recouped, since
section 18A will not apply to the donation.) (3)
No deduction of 10% of taxable income will be allowed under section 18A, since it was not made to a
qualifying PBO. (1)
Donations tax at a rate of 20% will be payable on the market value of the donation of kitchenware of
R55 000 plus the cash donation of R500, thus R11 100 (R55 500 x 20%) donations tax will be payable at
the end of the month following the month during which the donation was made after the date of the
donation, thus on or before 29 February 2024. (3)
Stock stolen
No further adjustment, since the deduction will be allowed when this stock is not included in closing stock.
(1)
Stock sold as scrap and proceeds donated
The R500 received for the sale of the damaged kitchenware should be included in gross income as trading
stock sold. (1)
The R500 donated will not be allowed under section 18A as a deduction from taxable income of Megachef
(Pty) Ltd, since it was not made to a qualifying PBO. (1)
Total 21 1
Max 17
109
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 6 31 marks
You are currently studying towards your Postgraduate Diploma in Applied Accounting Sciences (CTA 2)
and are preparing for your final examination. You have begged and borrowed various test and exam
questions from some of your friends studying at other institutions and today, after finalising your studies
of Tutorial Letter 105, have decided to attempt some of these questions as part of your final preparation.
Assume that all amounts exclude VAT, unless specifically stated otherwise.
PART A 13 marks
Standby Elec (Pty) Ltd (referred to as Standby) is a resident company that specialises in the
manufacturing and maintenance of industrial generators. Standby is a VAT vendor that only makes
taxable supplies. It has a 31 December year-end and does not qualify as a SBC.
The write-off period of generators under Binding General Ruling No. 7 (or Interpretation Note No. 47) is
15 years.
On 1 September 2022, Standby took one of its manufactured generators from its trading stock to be used
on a temporary basis as a capital asset at its administrative office building. It was Standby’s intention to
sell this generator in future. It will be sold as a used or second-hand generator. The cost to manufacture
this generator (incurred during its 2022 year of assessment) was R1 250 000. Its market value on
1 September 2022 was R2 050 000. Its market value on 31 December 2022 was R1 750 000.
On 30 August 2023, Standby sold the generator that it had been using in its administrative office building
for R1 955 000 (including VAT).
REQUIRED: Marks
(i) Calculate (supported with reference to legislation) the effect that the information
provided in part A has on the taxable income for Standby Elec (Pty) Ltd in its 2022
and 2023 years of assessment. Assume that the current legislation is applicable to 4
both the 2022 and 2023 years of assessment.
(ii) Recalculate (supported with reference to legislation) the effect that the information
provided in part A has on the taxable income for Standby Elec (Pty) Ltd’s 2022 and
2023 years of assessment, on the assumption that it does NOT manufacture
generators, but merely buys and sells them. Round off all amounts to the nearest 9
rand.
QUESTION 6 (continued)
PART B 9 marks
Going-Slow (Pty) Ltd (referred to as Going-Slow), a VAT vendor with a June year-end, is one of many
manufacturing companies (this is classified as a process of manufacture by SARS) currently experiencing
serious cash flow problems owing to the slow economy. To try and save the business and to regain
financial stability, the company has requested a compromise of its debts from several of its creditors.
The details of two of the transactions (both with independent parties) for which Going-Slow requested
and was granted a compromise of its outstanding debt on 30 June 2023 are listed below:
• Out-of-Cash Ltd discharged the outstanding debt relating to a new manufacturing machine
purchased by Going-Slow on 1 April 2022 for R1 850 000. SARS allows a 5-year write-off period
on these machines (if applicable) in terms of Binding General Ruling No. 7 (or
Interpretation Note No. 47). R950 000 of this debt was still outstanding on 30 June 2023.
• An outstanding creditor, Restless (Pty) Ltd, with a balance of R765 000 on 30 June 2023, was
discharged. Going-Slow owed Restless (Pty) Ltd this amount for various trading stock purchases
made during Going-Slow’s 2023 year of assessment. Going-Slow still had R350 000 of this trading
stock on hand at 30 June 2023.
REQUIRED: Marks
Discuss, supported by calculations and reference to income tax legislation, the normal tax
implications of the transactions for Going-Slow (Pty) Ltd for the company’s 2023 year of
9
assessment.
PART C 9 marks
On 15 September 2022 Reno Vate (a 40-year-old woman) decided to buy a small house, renovate it and
rent it out in order to earn additional income. The purchase price was R1 250 000. Although the property
is old, it only required limited work before it could be let.
The first tenant moved in on 1 January 2023 (paying a monthly rental of R8 000), after Reno had effected
the following renovations:
R
Replacing damaged carpets with wooden floors 25 000
Installing a security system 35 000
Painting the exterior and interior walls of the house 12 500
Landscaping the garden (the house did not have a garden before, only grass) 15 000
Total cost 87 500
111
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 6 (continued)
REQUIRED: Marks
Discuss, with reference to section 11(d) and case law, whether the renovation expenses
incurred by Reno Vate will be deductible for income tax purposes during her 2023 year of
assessment. 9
112
TAX4862/105/2023
PART A
(i) Effect on taxable income of Standby Elec (Pty) Ltd in its 2022 and 2023
years of assessment
R
2022 year of assessment
The manufacturing costs (excluding VAT) are deductible under s 11(a). (1 250 000) (1)
There is no s 22(8) adjustment (recoupment) - because the generator was
manufactured by Standby, it will be dealt with under par (jA) of the gross income
definition on disposal (no capital allowances are allowed as it is not considered to
be an allowance asset); thus it is treated as trading stock until sold. -
Closing stock is valued at cost (s 22(1)) (there was no reduction in the value of
the generator). 1 250 000 (1)
The acquisition costs (excluding VAT) are deductible under s 11(a) (1 250 000) (1)
S 22(8) adjustment (recoupment) at market value 2 050 000 (2)
S 11(e) over 15 years (2 050 000/15 x 4/12) (45 556) (1)
Note: Section 11(e) is applied as the information states that Standby does not
manufacture generators, but merely buys and sells them.
PART B
The debt benefit arose due to a compromise regarding a debt that was initially
used to finance an allowance asset, therefore section 19 applies.
The amount of the debt benefit of R950 000 will first be applied to reduce the
base cost of the asset of R740 000 (R1 850 000 – R740 000 (40% - 2022
(s 12C)) – R370 000 (20% - 2023)) in terms of par 12A. The base cost of the
asset will now be reduced to Rnil (R740 000 – R740 000). No further (2)
allowances on the manufacturing machine will be allowed under s 19(7). (1)
The remaining debt benefit amount of R210 000 (R950 000 – R740 000) will be (1)
a recoupment.
Recoupment under s 19(6) read with s 8(4)(a) is included in gross income. 210 000 (1)
Trading stock – Restless (Pty) Ltd
The debt benefit amount of R765 000 will first be applied to reduce the cost of
the trading stock still held at the time of the compromise of the debt. The
deduction under s 11(a) for the trading stock purchased will be reduced to
R415 000.
Purchase of trading stock (s 11(a)). (765 000) (1)
Debt benefit due to compromise under s 19(3). 350 000 (1)
The remaining amount of R415 000 (R765 000 – R350 000) of the debt benefit
will be a deemed recoupment in gross income under s 19(4) read with s 8(4)(a).
Recoupment (s 19(4) read with s 8(4)(a)) 415 000 (2)
Total 9
PART C
The renovation cost will only be deductible if it meets all the requirements of section 11(d), namely
that it is
The expenditure was actually incurred by Reno Vate (given) during the 2023 year of assessment (started
on 15 September 2022 and finalised in December 2022, year-end 28 February 2023). (1)
The main concern is whether each cost can be classified as a repair. A repair is a renewal of a subsidiary
part, whereas an improvement will increase the income-earning capacity of the asset (Flemming v KBI
(1994)). (2)
114
TAX4862/105/2023
• Replacing damaged carpets with wooden floors – this is a repair, since it is a renewal of a
subsidiary part, although the replacement material is not identical (CIR v African Products
Manufacturing Co Ltd (1944)). (2)
• Installing a security system – this is not a renewal of a subsidiary part, it is a new addition and an
improvement to the house. (1)
• Painting the exterior and interior walls of the house – classified as a repair, since the house is
restored to its original condition. (1)
• Landscaping a garden (the house did not have a garden before, only grass) – the garden is a new
addition, will increase income-earning capacity – not a repair (not replacing a subsidiary part), but
an improvement. (1)
The replacement of the carpets and the painting of the walls might qualify for deduction under section
11(d) but only if they are in respect of an asset in terms of which income is receivable. Although income
was not received when the repairs were done, the section only requires that income is receivable at the
time of the repairs being done. (1)
Conclusion
The R25 000 for the floors and the R12 500 for the painting will be deductible under section 11(d),
whereas the cost of the garden and the security system will be classified as improvements and would be
part of the base cost of the house. (1)
Total 10
Max 9
115
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 7 5 marks
Five years ago, Mrs Flan, a cordon bleu chef, opened a cookery school. For this purpose, she formed a
close corporation, and named it Flan’s Cookery School CC. Mrs Flan is its sole member and one of its
employees.
Mrs Flan’s member’s interest in Flan’s Cookery School CC is her only shareholding in a company or close
corporation.
The school is registered as a vendor for VAT purposes. It has to submit a 2-monthly VAT return for periods
ending on the last day of February, April, June, August, October and December of each year. Flan’s
Cookery School CC has a February year-end.
The school enrols a total of 20 trainees each year. It is closed during the school holidays and therefore
operates over 4 terms per year. The trainees are charged a fee of R3 220 per term (which includes VAT
of R420).
You have recently qualified as a chartered accountant. Mrs Flan has approached you with the following
VAT and normal tax queries relating either to herself, or to Flan’s Cookery School CC, or to both of them.
Flan’s Cookery School CC purchased consumable stores (for example, soap powders, dish clothes,
dishwashing liquids, polish, oven cleaners, disinfectants) for its entire 2023 calendar year during
January 2023 for R23 000 (R20 000 plus R3 000 VAT).
Mrs Flan has taken 5% of these consumables for use in her private home (the cost of the individual items
of consumable stores used could not be readily determined). A further 10% was consumed by the cookery
school during January and February. At the end of its year of assessment, 85% of the consumable stores
were therefore still on hand.
REQUIRED: Marks
Explain to Mrs Flan both the normal tax and VAT consequences of using 5% of the
consumable stores purchased by Flan’s Cookery School CC in her private home and of 85%
of the consumable stores still being on hand at the end of the year of assessment of Flan’s
Cookery School CC. 5
(Extract SAICA 2002 - adapted)
116
TAX4862/105/2023
When Mrs Flan helped herself to the consumable stores, she was given a taxable fringe benefit by her
employer (Flan’s Cookery School CC). The value of this fringe benefit (fringe benefits will be covered in
TL106) is, in terms of paragraph 5(2) of the Seventh Schedule to the Income Tax Act, (1)
“the cost thereof to the employer or, where such asset was held as trading stock and the market value
thereof was less than such cost, such market value”. (1)
On the assumption that the market value is greater than the cost of the trading stock, the cost of R1 000
(R20 000 x 5%) must be included in Mrs Flan’s gross income.
Flan’s Cookery School CC will be entitled to a R20 000 deduction in terms of section 11(a) in its 2023
year of assessment for the purchases of the consumable stores. Note that section 23H cannot limit this
deduction as it does not apply to the acquisition of trading stock. (1)
As the definition of trading stock includes consumable stores, it forms part of Flan’s Cookery School CC’s
trading stock.
Closing stock of R17 000 (R20 000 x 85%) is added back to taxable income for the 2023 year of
assessment, being the consumable stores on hand at the end of its year of assessment (section 22(1) of
the Income Tax Act). (1)
The use of the consumables by Mrs Flan falls under section 22(8)(b)(iv), in that it is trading stock that was
applied other than in the ordinary course of trade (as the cost could not be readily determined [given in
the facts]). Flan’s Cookery School CC will be deemed to have disposed of the trading stock at market
value. Therefore 5% of trading stock used by Mrs Flan will be included in Flan’s Cookery School CC’s
income as a recoupment at market value in terms of section 22(8)(B). A deduction of the same amount
will be allowed as part of salary cost. (1)
When Flan’s Cookery School CC purchased the consumable stores, an input tax deduction of R3 000
was claimed. (1)
Although Mrs Flan took 5% of these consumable stores for her own use, no adjustment is required in
terms of section 18(1) of the VAT Act because the consumable stores are still used in making taxable
supplies (providing an employee with a fringe benefit). (1)
Flan’s Cookery School CC will, in terms of section 18(3) of the VAT Act, have to account for a deemed
output tax for this taxable benefit which it provided to its employee, Mrs Flan, calculated by multiplying
the cost of the consumable stores by the tax fraction (15/115). The cost is the consideration which is
calculated as the cash equivalent under the Seventh Schedule (being the lower of cost or open market
value, which in this case we assume is the cost), i.e. R1 000 (thus R1 000 x 15/115 = R130). (1)
No adjustment for the items still on hand at year-end.
Subtotal 8
Max 5
117
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 8 30 marks
Etophia (Pty) Ltd (“Etophia”) is a South African company that manufactures leather suitcases and
handbags. The company has a December year-end and is a vendor for VAT purposes with monthly tax
periods. All amounts exclude VAT, unless specifically stated otherwise.
The information under parts A and B relates to the 2023 year of assessment of Etophia (Pty) Ltd.
PART A 20 marks
On 1 January 2021 Etophia purchased a plot of land for R450 000. Erection of a factory on this land
commenced on 1 February 2021. It was completed on 30 September 2021 at a cost of R2 500 000 and was
brought into use in a process of manufacture on 1 October 2021.
As a result of continued unrest in the vicinity of this factory, the board of directors of Etophia decided on
1 March 2023 to dispose of the land and buildings (factory) as soon as possible. The land and buildings were
sold to a non-connected party on 30 September 2023 for R3 300 000, R500 000 of which was for the land
and R2 800 000 for the buildings. Etophia continued to use the land and buildings in its process of manu-
facture for the period 1 March 2023 to 30 September 2023.
In anticipation of the proposed sale, Etophia entered into a 20-year operating lease agreement with Inco Ltd
(a South African taxpayer) for the lease of an industrial site on 1 March 2023. This lease agreement stipulated
that Etophia would
Erection of the factory commenced on 1 April 2023. It was completed on 30 September 2023 and was
brought into use on 1 October 2023. The cost of the factory was R3 300 000.
REQUIRED: MARKS
(i) Calculate the effect of the information provided above on the taxable income of
Etophia (Pty) Ltd for the year of assessment ending 31 December 2023.
Show all calculations and round off all amounts to the nearest rand.
Assume that Etophia wants to limit its normal tax liability for the 2023 year of
assessment to a minimum and will make any elections available to it in order to 12
achieve this. Refer to applicable legislation.
(ii) Assume that Etophia (Pty) Ltd entered into the operating lease with the Municipality
of Tshwane and not with Inco Ltd as stated in part A. Discuss the implications of the
premium paid and the erection of the factory on the taxable income of Etophia for the
year of assessment ending 31 December 2023. 8
118
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 8 (continued)
PART B 10 marks
1. Market research
During January 2023, Etophia decided to do some market research on the consumers’ preferred
colour of choice when purchasing suitcases and handbags. The total cost of the market research
amounted to R50 000.
The final results of the research showed that smokey grey was definitely the preferred colour of
choice.
2. Second-hand plant
On 1 May 2023, Etophia purchased a second-hand plant from Suppa (Pty) Ltd (a connected person)
for R220 000. Etophia brought the plant into use in its process of manufacture on the same day. This
plant was independently valued at a market value of R225 000 on 1 May 2023.
3. Residential property
On 1 November 2021, Etophia bought, from the developer, 5 of the 20 flats in a newly erected block
of flats in the Republic, at a total cost of R300 000 (including VAT) each. All of these flats were let to
employees for a monthly rental of R2 500 each, effective from 1 December 2021.
Etophia does not own any other residential units in the Republic.
4. Learnership agreement
Solomon Mathlanga (who is disabled and has an NQF level 6 qualification) has been in the employ of
Etophia since 1 January 2023. Solomon receives remuneration of R170 000 per annum. On
1 January 2023 Solomon entered into a 12-month registered learnership agreement with Etophia. He
successfully completed the learnership agreement on 31 December 2023.
REQUIRED: MARKS
Calculate the implications of all the above transactions on the taxable income of
Etophia (Pty) Ltd for the year of assessment ending 31 December 2023.
Show all calculations and round off all amounts to the nearest rand. 10
(Test 2 TAX4861 2014 – adapted)
119
TAX4862/105/2023
PART A (i) R R
Land:
Proceeds 500 000
Less: Base cost (450 000)
Capital gain 50 000 (1)
Factory building R
Proceeds
- Received on disposal 2 800 000
- Less: Recoupment (s 13(3)) (375 000) 2 425 000 (1)
Capital gain/loss
Gain on disposal of land 50 000
Gain on disposal of factory building 300 000
Net capital gain 350 000 (1)
Include in taxable income at inclusion rate – R350 000 x 80% 280 000 (1)
Total 15
Max 12
PART A (ii)
Section 10(1)(a) exempts from normal tax the receipts and accruals of the government of the
Republic in the national, provincial or local sphere. (1)
The Municipality of Tshwane is exempt in terms of s 10(1)(a) and will not be taxed on the lease
premium received or the value of the leasehold improvements and therefore Etophia will not
qualify for a deduction in terms of section 11(f) and 11(g). (1)
Section 11(f) contains an exception to the rule in respect of lease premiums paid in respect of the
use of certain lines or cables – Etophia does not qualify for this exception. (1)
Section 12N
In terms of section 12N, if a taxpayer incurs expenditure in respect of improvements to land or
buildings leased in terms of an agreement with the government of the Republic in the national,
provincial or local sphere, the taxpayer will for purposes of sections 11D, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12F, 12I,
12S, 13, 13ter, 13quat, 13quin, 13sex or 36 and for the Eighth Schedule be deemed to be the owner
of the improvements. (1)
As a result of section 12N the taxpayer will, although he does not qualify for the application of
section 11(f) and 11(g), qualify for a section 13 deduction in respect of the improvements.
121
TAX4862/105/2023
Section 13
Section 13 provides for a deduction in respect of buildings and improvements used in a process
of manufacture in the course of any trade other than mining or farming.
Proviso (d) to section 13(1) provides that in the case of an improvement as contemplated in
section 12N, the expenditure incurred by the taxpayer to complete the improvement is for the (1)
purposes of section 13 deemed to be the cost to the taxpayer of any building or improvement.
Etophia will thus qualify for a deduction of
R3 300 000 – R375 000 (recoupment in terms of s 13(3)) x 5% = R146 250 (2)
Total 9
Max 8
R
PART B
1 Market research
Deductible under section 11(a) (50 000) (1)
2 Second-hand plant
Section 12C applicable as second-hand plant used in manufacturing
process (from connected person – no effect on cost).
Section 12C allowance based on lesser of cost (R220 000) or cash
cost in an arm’s length transaction (R225 000):
Therefore section 12C allowance calculated on R220 000
3 Residential units
Residential units rented
Rent received R2 500 x 5 x 12 months 150 000 (1)
Section 13sex is applicable as Etophia owns at least 5 residential
units within the Republic.
Cost R300 000 each (VAT not deductible as exempt supply), thus
less than R350 000 each.
Rent is R2 500 per month each, thus less than 1% of cost.
The units qualify as “low-cost residential units”, as defined in
section 1 of the Income Tax Act. (1)
R300 000 x 10% x 55% x 5 = R82 500 (82 500) (3)
(Note that for the purpose of testing for the 1%, cost can be increased
by 10% for each year succeeding the year in which the flat is first
brought into use. Thus for cost use: (R300 000 x 10% x 2) +
R300 000 = R360 000).
4 Learnership agreement
Salary – Solomon (170 000) (1)
Annual allowance – R60 000 (i.e. R40 000 + R20 000) (section
12H(2)(a) read with 12H(5)) (60 000) (1)
Completion allowance – R60 000 (i.e. R40 000 + R20 000)
(section 12H(3) read with 12H(5)) (60 000) (1)
Total 11
MAX 10
122
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 9 11 marks
Mr Solute Kerzner acquired equity shares in a company listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange
(JSE Ltd) on 10 December 2019. At the time of acquisition, he intended to hold these shares as an
investment. However, during July 2021, he changed his intention to that of speculating with listed shares,
thereby effectively commencing to carry out a scheme of profit-making by trading with such shares and
seen by SARS as a share dealer. On 5 April 2022, these share prices reached an all-time high and he
disposed of the shares at a considerable profit. Details of these shares are as follows:
R
Cost price 10 000
Value at the time of changing his intention 40 000
Proceeds on disposal 100 000
No other disposals were made by Mr Kerzner for the entire period, except for the information provided
above.
REQUIRED: Marks
(i) Briefly discuss whether the proceeds on the disposal of the listed shares during the
2023 year of assessment will constitute gross income in his hands. Refer to relevant 4
case law.
(ii) Explain the normal tax implications (if any) that will flow from the change of intention
by Mr Kerzner during the 2022 year of assessment. 4
(iii) Indicate whether your answer to (i) will be different if the acquisition date was
10 December 2018 (and not 10 December 2019) and, if so, indicate in what way. 3
(i) The proceeds on the sale of the shares will only constitute gross income if it is revenue in nature.
The intention of the taxpayer with regard to the shares will determine the capital or revenue nature
of the proceeds. Initially, when the shares were bought, the taxpayer’s intention was to hold the
shares as an investment (and earn dividend income), thus as a capital asset (“tree v fruit” – Visser’s
case). However, the taxpayer’s intention changed in the course of the 2022 year of assessment
from holding the shares as an investment to dealing in shares. The taxpayer has “crossed the
Rubicon” (Natal Estates case) with no distinction between an investment and a speculative portfolio.
Accordingly, the proceeds of R100 000 on the sale of the shares are revenue in nature and
constitute gross income. (4)
(ii) In terms of paragraph 12(2)(c) of the Eighth Schedule, Mr Kerzner will be treated as having disposed
of his capital asset (the listed shares) for proceeds equal to its market value at the time of such
change of intention (R40 000) while, in terms of section 22(3)(a)(ii), he will also be deemed to have
acquired trading stock at a cost equal to that same market value (R40 000). The deemed disposal
of the capital asset will result in a capital gain of R40 000 (deemed proceeds) less R10 000 (base
cost) = R30 000 for Mr Kerzner. Mr Kerzner is entitled to an annual exclusion of R40 000 against
the total capital gains, which in this case amounts to R30 000 and accordingly, his taxable capital
gain is nil. Mr Kerzner will now hold such shares (from the time of changing his intention) as part of
his opening balance of trading stock at the same amount of R40 000. (4)
123
TAX4862/105/2023
(iii) Yes, it would differ. The shares would then constitute “qualifying shares” in terms of section 9C of
the Income Tax Act and section 9C will apply to deem the proceeds on disposal of the shares to
be capital in nature as they were held for more than three years (notwithstanding the fact that
they were held with a speculative intention and held as trading stock). The proceeds will thus not
constitute gross income, but will be subject to capital gains tax. (3)
11
QUESTION 10 50 marks
Peter Molantoa (55 years of age) is a local businessman residing in Modimolle, Limpopo, South Africa.
He owns and manages the following two separate business enterprises as a sole proprietor:
Both business enterprises are registered as separate branches for VAT purposes on the invoice basis.
All amounts exclude VAT unless specifically indicated or implied otherwise. Peter wants to pay the least
amount of tax legally possible.
The following notes pertain to the two business ventures mentioned above:
Business enterprise 1
Peter purchased an 80-hectare property situated near the town of Modimolle at a cost of R2 300 000
(open market value) during February 2020 from an individual (a resident, but not a VAT vendor nor a
connected person) and immediately commenced constructing a large store on the property from which to
operate a drying plant for sorghum malt. The cost of excavating and levelling the land amounted to
R120 000. The cost of the construction of the building (store) amounted to R570 000. The construction of
the store was completed on 31 May 2020 and the store in its entirety qualifies as a building used in a
process of manufacture. From 1 April 2020, when the property was registered in his name, Peter has
been settling the purchase price in R50 000 monthly instalments on an interest-free basis.
A new drying plant was imported from Japan. The cost price of R512 000, correctly translated to SA rand,
was paid on 15 March 2020. Import duties amounted to R75 000 and was also paid on 15 March 2020.
The drying plant was installed in the store during June 2020 at a cost of R53 000. Both the drying plant
and the store were brought into use on 1 August 2020.
In order to improve the industrial capacity of the store, a loading bay was added to the store at a cost of
R180 000 and inside the store an office (also part of the store) was constructed at a cost of R95 000. Both
these improvements were brought into use on 1 May 2022. The office consisted of 10% of the total floor
space of the store and loading bay.
124
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 10 (continued)
Peter purchased and brought into use two delivery trucks (truck 1 and truck 2) at a cost of R230 000 each
on 1 August 2021 and financed them with two suspensive sale agreements at African Bank. Monthly
instalments amounted to R6 777 (including VAT) per truck, payable from 1 August 2021. The interest
portion of the amortisation of instalments number 8 (March 2022) to number 18 (January 2023) is R20 849
for truck 1 and for instalments number 8 (March 2022) to number 19 (February 2023) it is R22 472 for
truck 2. These trucks may be written off over 4 years in terms of Binding General Ruling No. 7 (or
Interpretation Note No. 47).
Truck 1 was completely written off in an accident on 30 January 2023 (after instalment number 18 of the
finance agreement was paid). Peter was indemnified by his insurance company on 1 February 2023 when
the insurance company deposited R210 000 into his bank account.
In the past Peter purchased germinated sorghum (to be placed in the drying process), but he has now
decided to germinate his own sorghum (a process of manufacture) as he could purchase it at favourable
prices from local farmers. Peter entered into a 5-year lease agreement with the owner (not a tax-exempt
entity) of a stand in the industrial area of Modimolle for the right of use of the property from 1 June 2022.
In terms of the lease agreement Peter was obliged to effect improvements to the property to the value of
R600 000. The improvements consisted of the laying (pouring/constructing) of level and connecting
blocks of concrete over an area of 600 m2. These improvements will qualify as a building used in the
process of manufacture.
Peter commenced with the laying of the connecting blocks of concrete on 1 June 2022 and it was
completed and brought into use by the sorghum business on 1 September 2022 at a cost of R850 000.
Business enterprise 2
Peter purchased 4 residential units with a cost price of R550 000 each in a new residential development
on the outskirts of Modimolle in January 2022. The properties were all registered in his name on
1 April 2022 and immediately placed on the rental market by a rental agent. Two of the properties (units
1 and 2) were let from 1 June 2022 and the other two (units 3 and 4) only from 1 July 2022. The rent per
unit is R5 500 per month.
The properties were financed by way of mortgage loans at a local bank. The interest on the mortgage
loans was incurred as follows:
Units 1 and 2 1 April 2022 to 31 May 2022 R16 488
1 June 2022 to 28 February 2023 R73 558
Units 3 and 4 1 April 2022 to 30 June 2022 R24 713
1 July 2022to 28 February 2023 R65 333
125
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 10 (continued)
Peter purchased a newly developed office building directly from a developer (a VAT vendor) at a total
inclusive cost of R6 555 000 on 1 October 2022 and paid a R500 000 deposit on the same date. The
balance of R6 055 000, which was paid on 2 January 2023, was financed by a bank loan over a 20-year
period with fixed monthly repayments of R54 478 payable from 31 January 2023. The fixed yield to
maturity rate on this finance is 0.75% per month.
The building was registered in Peter’s name on 2 January 2023 and he immediately entered into a 10-
year lease agreement with a provincial government department through which the department leases the
building from Peter at a monthly rental of R85 000 from 1 February 2023. By 28 February 2023 Peter had
not yet received any payment from the department, but he was still hopeful that he would eventually
receive payment.
On 2 January 2023 he paid the short-term insurance on the building for a period of 12 months (evenly
incurred) in advance. The total premium amounted to R136 800.
A laptop with a cost price of R20 700 (VAT included) was purchased and brought into use by the rental
business on 1 February 2023. Laptops may be written off over 3 years in terms of Binding General Ruling
No. 7 (or Interpretation Note No. 47). You may assume that SARS will accept a turnover-based method
ratio of 80% for commercial rentals and 20% for residential rentals.
126
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 10 (continued)
REQUIRED: Marks
(i) Discuss, supported with calculations, the VAT effect of the purchase of the property in
note 1 for the sorghum business.
You also need to indicate when input tax (if any) may be claimed.
You are not required to refer to legislation in your discussion. You must assume that
current legislation applies.
4
(ii) Calculate the income tax effect of the transactions in notes 1 to 3 for the sorghum
business for the year of assessment ended 28 February 2023.
19
If a specific item has no income tax effect, indicate this together with reasons for it.
(iii) Indicate, with reasons, how your answer to (ii) will differ if Peter constructed the
building used in the process of manufacture (factory 2 in note 3) on land owned by the
municipality (a local government and a tax-exempt entity). 4
(iv) Indicate, with reasons, how your answer to (ii) will differ if Peter constructed an office
building instead of a building used in a process of manufacture (factory 9 in note 3) on
the leasehold property owned by a taxpaying entity. 2
(v) Discuss, supported with calculations and relevant references to the Income Tax and
VAT Acts, the income tax and VAT effect for Peter if he decides to sell the property,
including the store and the improvements (factory 1), on 1 April 2023 to an unconnec-
ted person, but excluding the drying plant which will be moved to different premises
(refer note 1).
Peter will reinvest the full proceeds from the sale of the store and improvements in a
similar replacement asset (also a store to be used solely in a process of manufacture)
within a period of 4 months.
The expected selling price is R2 400 000 (excluding VAT) for the property and
R840 000 (excluding VAT) for the store (factory 1).
The tax value of the store and improvements have already been correctly calculated
as R703 500 as at 1 April 2023.
The total cost price for the store and improvements amounted to R845 000 (exclu-
ding VAT) on 1 April 2023 (note 1).
You may ignore any capital gains tax consequences of these transactions. 6
(vi) Calculate the income tax effect of the transactions in notes 4 to 6 for the rental busi-
ness. If a specific item has no income tax effect, indicate this together with a reason
for it.
15
TOTAL 50
127
TAX4862/105/2023
Notional input tax can be claimed on the land purchased as it is second-hand goods from a (1)
non-vendor (a supply that is not a taxable supply).
The notional input tax should be claimed as the tax fraction (15/115) with no apportionment, (1)
as the land will be used entirely (100%) for enterprise purposes to make taxable supplies.
Value of supply in terms of par (b) of the definition of input tax will be the lower of the (1)
consideration in money or the open market value - both constituting R2 300 000 in this case.
R2 300 000 x 15/115 = R300 000 (1)
Time of supply in terms of section 9(3)(d) is the earlier of registration or the date of any (1)
payment - 1 April 2020.
However, in terms of section 16(3)(a)(ii)(bb)(A) the input tax may only be deducted when
the property has been registered and then only to the extent that payment, which reduces
the obligation, is made (section 16(3)(a)(iiA)).
(1)
Therefore, the notional input tax may be claimed in every tax (VAT) period when a R50 000
payment is made OR R50 000 x 15/115 = R6 522
Total 6
Max 4
CGT calculation:
Proceeds = R182 609 less R38 859 (recoupment) = R143 750
Less: Base cost = R143 750 (R230 000 – (R33 542 + R52 708) (s11(e) (1)
(allowances))
Capital gain/(loss) = Rnil -
No section 11(g) allowance can be claimed as the improvements will not be income in
terms of par (h) of the gross income definition in the hands of the municipality in terms of (2)
section 11(g)(vi).
However, in terms of section 12N, the lessee is deemed to be the owner of the leasehold
improvements and therefore Peter will qualify for a section 13(1) allowance of 5% on the
cost price of the improvements of R850 000. (2)
Total 4
(v) Income tax and VAT effect on the selling of the land and the store
VAT effect
Output tax must be levied on the selling price of both the property and the store at 15%
as the assets form part of the enterprise and were used to make taxable supplies.
Section 7(1)(a) of the VAT Act. (1)
BUT, in terms of section 13(3) of the Income Tax Act the recoupment does not have to
be included in taxable income, as a replacement building will be purchased or erected
within 12 months from the selling date of 1 April 2023. The recoupment will be deducted
from the cost price of the replacement asset. (1)
The selling of the land only gives rise to a capital gain as no allowance was claimed (not
required).
Par 65 of the 8th Schedule is not applicable as it will not be an involuntary disposal (not
required).
Par 66 of the 8th Schedule is not applicable as it does not apply to section 13 assets as
is the case under review (not required).
Total 6
(vi) Income tax effect of the transactions in notes 4 - 6 for the rental business
R
4 Residential units
No section 13sex allowance on residential units let as Peter owns fewer than
5 units in the RSA - (1)
Rent received (R5 500 x 2 units x 9 m) + (R5 500 x 2 units x 8 m) 187 000 (2)
130
TAX4862/105/2023
5 Office building
Section 13quin allowance on building (new and unused)
(R6 555 000 x 100/115 x 5% x 100%) (285 000) (2)
Interest incurred on the loan for January 2023 (R6 055 000 x 0.75%) (45 413) (1)
Interest incurred - January 2023 - may not qualify under section 11(a) due to
trade requirement, but could qualify under section 11A (pre-trade
expenditure)
Interest incurred on the loan for February 2023 (R6 045 935 x 0.75%) (45 345) (2)
(R6 055 000 + R45 413 - R54 478 = R6 045 935 x 0.75%)
Short-term insurance - January 2023 - R136 800/12 = R11 400 - may not
qualify under section 11(a) due to trade requirement, but could qualify under
(1)
section 11A (if the requirements of section 11A are met, also can only be
deducted from taxable income for rental from office and cannot create a loss)). (11 400)
Short-term insurance - February 2023 - R11 400 (11 400)
Short-term insurance - March - December 2023 - R114 000 - not deductible
(section 23H) as it is for a period of > 6 months and > R100 000. - (1)
6 Laptop purchased
R20 700 - ([R20 700 x 15/115] = R2 700 VAT x 80%) = R20 700 - R 2 160 =
R18 540/3 y x 1 m/12 m) (515) (3)
Total 16
Max 15
131
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 11 33 marks
Background information
Pinotage Winery Ltd(Pinotage) is a resident company that produces and bottles wine (classified as a
“process of manufacture” by SARS) that is sold both locally and internationally. Pinotage has an August
year-end and a one-month tax period for VAT purposes. Pinotage is not a small business corporation.
The equity share capital in Pinotage is held as follows:
Before taking into account the income tax effect of the transactions and information listed below, Pinotage
has a taxable income of R1 250 000 for its 2023 year of assessment. All amounts exclude VAT, unless
indicated otherwise.
1. On 1 July 2023 Pinotage sold and directly exported 15 000 bottles of wine to Bordoux at €5 (including
VAT at 0%) a bottle. Pinotage usually sells and exports wine at €9 (including VAT) a bottle to foreign
buyers. 60% of the selling price was paid on 31 July 2023 and the outstanding 40% of the purchase
price is only payable on 1 October 2024. Bordoux will pay interest at 5% per annum from the date of
purchase on all amounts owing to Pinotage. Pinotage usually charges interest at a rate of 11% on all
credit sales effective from the date of purchase.
Spot rate
Date
€1 = R
1 July 2023 €1 = R15,86
31 July 2023 €1 = R15,90
31 August 2023 €1 = R15,95
31 August 2024 €1 = R15,85
1 October 2024 €1 = R15,80
Average exchange rate for the period 1 July 2023 to 31 July 2023 €1 = R15,88
Average exchange rate for the period 1 July 2023 to 31 August 2023 €1 = R15,92
2. On 1 August 2023 Pinotage entered into a contract with Bottle It Up Ltd (an independent party) to
produce 75 000 bottles of a specific variety of wine that would only be sold to Bottle It Up Ltd. The
contract price was R800 000. Bottle It Up Ltd paid Pinotage R450 000 on 1 August 2023, the date
that the contract was entered into. The remaining R350 000 is payable on the date of delivery of
the wine. At 31 August 2023 Pinotage had incurred expenses of R150 000 in respect of the contract
and the company will have to incur further expenses of R200 000 to meet its obligations in respect
of the contract. The total amount of expenditure (R350 000) meets the requirements of
section 11(a).
132
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 11 (continued)
3. On 31 August 2023 Pinotage owned the following assets with a tax value of more than Rnil:
• Four flats in South Africa. The flats were acquired on 15 June 2022 at a cost of R320 000
(including VAT) each, directly from the developer. Since 1 July 2022 all the flats have been
rented to tenants for R2 500 each per month.
• An office building that was purchased on 1 July 2022 from Welston (Pty) Ltd (a non-connected
party) for R920 000. Welston (Pty) Ltd erected the office building during 2014 for its own use.
• A building in which the wine is produced (a factory) that was erected at a cost of R2 500 000
during the 2017 year of assessment. Pinotage paid R360 000 for improvements to the building
during the 2023 year of assessment.
• A manufacturing machine (machine A) that was given to Pinotage by Shiraz, free of charge, on
1 November 2022. Shiraz purchased the manufacturing machine new for R650 000 on
1 March 2020. On 1 November 2022 (the date that the machine was transferred and brought
into use by Pinotage) the manufacturing machine had an open market value of R570 000.
• Two manufacturing machines (machine B and machine C). Machine B was purchased new for
R740 000 on 1 May 2021 and machine C was purchased new for R820 000 on
1 December 2022. Both machines were brought into use on the date of purchase.
Binding General Ruling No. 7 allows for a 5-year write-off period on this type of manufacturing machine.
REQUIRED: Marks
(i) Calculate the effect that the transactions and information provided in the question will have
on the taxable income of Pinotage for the company’s 2023 year of assessment. Address
each item and if any item or part of an item has no income tax effect, provide a reason.
Assume that the Commissioner will allow the gross cost percentage on a contract as the 30
basis for calculating future costs, where applicable.
Round off all amounts to the nearest RAND.
(ii) Calculate the dividends tax payable in respect of the transactions and information provided
in the question. Also indicate by whom the dividends tax is payable. 3
Round off all amounts to the nearest RAND.
133
TAX4862/105/2023
(i)
R
1. Sales – (15 000 x €5) x R15,86 1 189 500 (2)
On 40% of debt not paid - (15 000 x €5) x 40% x 5% x 62/365 4 056 (2)
x R15,92 (section 25D(1)) = R4 056
Note:
The interest was translated at an average rate for the period during which it accrued as
interest is accrued on a daily basis (s24J) and using the average rate provides a more
accurate amount than using the spot rate at the end of the accrual period.
Section 31(2) adjustment
The interest that would have arisen had the credit transaction
been between Pinotage and an independent third party would
have been
(15 000 x €5) x 60% x 11% x 31/365 x R15,88 6 676
(15 000 x €5) x 40% x 11% x 62/365 x R15,92 8 924
Total amount of interest payable 15 600
Less: Amount accounted for (R3 035 + R4 056) (7 091) 8 509 (2)
134
TAX4862/105/2023
Dividends tax
In terms of section 31(3) a deemed dividend in specie should be accounted for in respect of the
section 31(2) adjustment, thus:
dividends tax payable - (R951 600 + R8 487) x 20% (section 64E(1)) = R192 017 (2)
The dividends tax is payable by Pinotage Winery Limited as it is a dividend in specie
(section 64EA(b)). (1)
Total 3
135
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 12 28 marks
Background information
Clear Velvet Ltd (“Clear Velvet”) is a resident company that manufactures anti-aging skincare products
(classified as a “process of manufacture” by SARS) that are sold both locally and internationally. Clear
Velvet has a December year-end and a one-month tax period for VAT purposes. Clear Velvet is not a
small business corporation as defined. All amounts exclude VAT, unless specifically indicated
otherwise.
• 18% of the shares and voting rights by Radiant Skin Plc (“Radiant Skin”), a non-resident company
located in France;
• 70% of the shares and voting rights by Natural Beauty Plc (“Natural Beauty”), a non-resident
company located in Germany
• 12% of the shares and voting rights by Skincare (Pty) Ltd (“Skincare”), a resident company
Transactions
1. Clear Velvet purchased 100 kg of a specific anti-aging serum, used in the manufacturing of its
skincare products, from Radiant Skin at €200 per kilogram on 1 April 2023. Radiant Skin usually sells
this specific anti-aging serum at an arm’s length price of €140 per kilogram. The anti-aging serum
was shipped FOB on 15 April 2023. It arrived at the premises of Clear Velvet on 31 May 2023. Import
duty of R52 000 and VAT of R43 680 was paid by Clear Velvet on clearance through customs. The
debt was paid by the company on 30 June 2023. At the end of December 2023 all 100 kg of the
serum had been used in the manufacturing of anti-aging skincare products.
Spot rate
Date
€1 = R
1 April 2023 €1 = R15,80
15 April 2023 €1 = R15,90
30 April 2023 €1 = R15,95
31 May 2023 €1 = R15,80
30 June 2023 €1 = R15,85
31 December 2023 €1 = R15,75
Average exchange rate for the 2023 year of assessment was €1 = R15,83
2. Natural Beauty granted Clear Velvet a loan of R2 000 000 on 31 May 2023 at an interest rate of
25% per annum. Clear Velvet used the loan to purchase a new manufacturing machine at a cost of
R2 000 000. The machine was brought into use in Clear Velvet’s manufacturing process on
15 June 2023. Applications with several independent financial institutions revealed that Clear Velvet
could only qualify for a loan of R1 200 000 at an arm’s length interest rate of 17% per annum.
Natural Beauty does not carry on business through a permanent establishment in South Africa. All
interest is compounded annually.
136
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 12 (continued)
REQUIRED: Marks
(i) Calculate the effect of transaction 1 on the income tax payable by Clear Velvet Ltd for
the 2023 year of assessment. 6
(ii) Calculate all the tax effects of the interest payable by Clear Velvet Ltd in respect of
transaction 2 for the 2023 year of assessment. Justify your answer with reasons, 10
supported by reference to legislation. Ignore any VAT implications.
(iii) Assume that Natural Beauty Plc reduces the R2 000 000 capital portion of the debt
together with capitalised interest of R500 000 to Rnil on 31 May 2024 due to Clear Velvet
Ltd experiencing financial difficulties.
Assume that total interest of R204 000 was correctly deducted for income tax purposes
by Clear Velvet Ltd during the company’s 2023 and 2024 year of assessment. The
reduction of the debt does not form part of a scheme to avoid tax.
Assume that the income tax legislation for the 2023 and 2024 year of assessment is the
same. Also assume that the reduction of the debt was due to a commercial decision and
does not constitute a donation.
In this transaction, although it is an international transaction that was not concluded at arm’s
length, it is not two connected parties dealing with each other, as Radiant Skin Plc only holds
18% of the shares in Clear Velvet Ltd. Section 31 is therefore not applicable.
Interest paid
Reasons
In terms of section 31(1) paragraph (b) the loan between Clear Velvet and Natural Beauty (2)
constitutes an affected transaction:
Natural Beauty is a non-resident person and Clear Velvet is a resident person (OR international (1)
cross-border transaction between connected persons) and both parties are connected persons
in relation to each other in terms of section 1 of the Income Tax Act. Natural Beauty holds 70%
of the equity shares and voting rights in Clear Velvet, which constitutes the “at least 20%” (OR (1)
more than 20%) as required in terms of par (d)(v) of the definition of connected person in relation
to a company.
The fact that Natural Beauty holds the majority voting rights in Clear Velvet (70%) will not
affect this connected persons status of the two companies as the proviso to section 31(4)
determines that the expression “and no holder of shares holds the majority voting rights in
the company” in paragraph (d)(v) of the definition must be disregarded.
138
TAX4862/105/2023
The terms of the transaction are different from any terms that would have existed had the persons
been independent persons dealing at arm’s length (or not at arm’s length or not market related).
An independent person would not have granted Clear Velvet a loan of R2 000 000 and an
independent person would only have charged Clear Velvet an interest rate of 17% and not 25%.
Therefore, financial assistance arises in terms of section 31(1). (1)
Section 31(2) will apply as it is an affected transaction in which Clear Velvet obtained a tax benefit
by obtaining a much higher deduction for interest than under normal circumstances. The interest
received by Natural Beauty will be exempt from normal tax in terms of section 10(1)(h). (1)
The amount of the difference of R173 545 (i.e. R117 260 + R56 285) will be deemed to be a
dividend in specie subject to dividends tax at the rate of 20%, resulting in a dividends tax amount
of R34 709 payable by Clear Velvet on 30 June 2024. (2)
Total 11
Max 10
Section 19 of the Income Tax Act and paragraph 12A of the 8th Schedule are applicable:
There was a concession or compromise in respect of a debt that was owed by a person and the
amount of the debt was used directly to fund expenditure for which a deduction and allowance were
granted in terms of the Income Tax Act. (1)
Section 19 and paragraph 12A of the 8th Schedule will not apply if
• the person and the other person (Clear Velvet and Natural Beauty) are companies that form
part of the same group of companies as defined in section 41 of the Income Tax Act, and
• the company to which the debt is owed did not carry on any trade during the year of
assessment that the debt arose and the immediately preceding year
Although Clear Velvet and Natural Beauty form part of the same group of companies in terms of
section 1, they do not form part of the same group of companies in terms of section 41, as Natural
Beauty (the non-resident company) is not managed and controlled in South Africa. It also seems
as if Natural Beauty is trading (not a dormant company). (2)
Therefore section 19 will apply in respect of the interest expense that was claimed and (1)
paragraph 12A will apply in respect of the allowance asset.
The debt that was reduced (debt benefit) is R2 000 000 plus interest of R500 000 capitalised (1)
against the debt, being R2 500 000.
Clear Velvet has claimed part of the interest portion of the debt, being R204 000 in terms of (1)
section 24J together with section 31.
As the interest of R204 000 was claimed as an income tax deduction, the provisions of section 19(5)
will apply and the amount will be recouped in the 2024 year of assessment in terms of (1)
section 8(4)(a).
The portion of the interest of (R500 000 – R204 000) = R296 000 that was prohibited in terms of
section 31(2) was not claimed as a tax deduction, neither was it used to finance an allowance asset (1)
or a capital asset; therefore, neither section 19 nor paragraph 12A of the 8th Schedule is applicable
to this amount. No tax implication arises in respect of this amount. (1)
The R2 000 000 was used to finance an allowance asset; therefore section 19 together with (1)
paragraph 12A should be applied.
In terms of paragraph 12A the base cost of the asset should be reduced by the reduction amount.
139
TAX4862/105/2023
R800 000 of the debt reduction should therefore be applied to reduce the base cost of the
machine by R800 000 to Rnil. (1)
The remaining capital portion of the debt reduction of R2 000 000 will be applied to recoup the
allowances claimed in respect of the allowance asset as a deduction for income tax purposes,
thus R2 000 000 – R800 000 = R1 200 000 will in terms of section 19(6) be a section 8(4)(a) (1)
recoupment.
No further section 12C allowances will be allowed to be claimed on the manufacturing machine (1)
by Clear Velvet in future years of assessment, due to the section 19(7) limitation, which is
calculated as follows:
Aggregate expenditure incurred in acquiring the asset: R2 000 000
Less: The sum of:
R2 000 000 (reduction amount) + R1 200 000 (deductions and allowances previously allowed in (1)
respect of the allowance asset) = (R3 200 000)
= Rnil
Total 16
Layout and presentation 2
18
Maximum 12
Total marks for the question 28
• Paragraph 12A of the Eighth Schedule is not applicable if the two parties to the
transaction are connected persons in terms of section 41 of the Income Tax Act. In terms
of section 41 both companies need to be residents of South Africa or the non-resident
company needs to be managed and controlled in South Africa. In this question one
company is a resident company and the other is a non-resident, but the non-resident
company is not managed and controlled in South Africa. Therefore paragraph 12A of the
Eighth Schedule is applicable.
• When applying section 19 it is important to note that any recoupment is always limited to
previous amounts deducted for income tax purposes. Therefore, as only interest of
R204 000 was deductible for income tax purposes, only R204 000 could be recouped.
The R296 000 balance of the interest was never allowed as a tax deduction, and
therefore there will be no income tax consequences in respect of the R296 000.
140
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 13 40 marks
Dentrix (Pty) Ltd (“Dentrix”) is a South African resident company that manufactures dental equipment and
other dental supplies, a process classified as a “process of manufacture” by SARS. The company also
distributes the dental equipment and supplies to various dental centres. Dentrix’s year-end is 30
September and it is a registered vendor for VAT purposes. The company is not a small business
corporation as defined. All amounts exclude VAT where applicable, unless stated or implied otherwise
and all transactions are with VAT vendors (unless stated otherwise). Assume all requisite supporting
documentation is in place.
The shareholders (not employed by the company and all South African residents ) of Dentrix are:
Dr Mike Nkosi (Dental surgeon) 40%
Mrs Caryn White (CA(SA)) 35%
Dr John Black (Dentist) 25%
The accountant calculated the company’s taxable income for the 2023 year of assessment to be
R32 500 550 before taking transactions 1 to 5 below into account. The company will make use of any
possible elections to legally minimise its tax liability.
Transactions
1. Dentrix made a cash dividend distribution of R2 700 000 to its shareholders. Dentrix also distributed
new dental equipment, manufactured by Dentrix during the 2023 year of assessment, to Dr Mike Nkosi
for use in his private practice. The dividend distributions were made on 1 April 2023. The open market
value of the dental equipment was R650 000, on the date of distribution, and the manufacturing costs
amounted to R480 000.
Dental supplies with a manufacturing cost of R31 050 (market value of R51 750) were removed from
trading stock and used for display purposes at the company’s entrance.
2. A specialised manufacturing machine was destroyed in a fire on 15 May 2023. A new replacement
machine was immediately purchased from a South African supplier. The destroyed machine was
purchased new and unused on 15 January 2021 at a cost of R870 000 (including VAT) to Dentrix and
brought into use on 31 January 2021.
Dentrix encountered problems with the insurance claim and as a result did not receive any insurance
pay-out but managed to sell the destroyed machine as scrap for R20 000 on 5 September 2023 to a
non-connected party. Dentrix received 50% of the selling price on 5 September 2023 and the other
50% of the selling price is receivable on 15 October 2023.
The replacement machine was purchased under a suspensive sale agreement on 20 May 2023 at a
cash price of R960 000 (including VAT) plus finance charges of R146 000 (in terms of s 24J of the
Income Tax Act) for the 24 months from 20 May 2023 to 20 May 2025. Due to technology changes, a
consultant was required to set up the software on the machine for the machine to be brought into
working condition. The consultant invoiced Dentrix for R83 000 (including VAT) on 15 July 2023. The
replacement machine was brought into use on 20 July 2023.
141
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 13 (continued)
3. Dentrix applies IFRS 9 for financial reporting purposes. The provision for doubtful debt (credit losses)
for the 2023 year of assessment amounts to R755 000, consisting of:
The Commissioner for SARS allowed a doubtful debt allowance in terms of s 11(j) of the Income Tax
Act in the amount of R167 500 for the 2022 year of assessment.
4. On 1 April 2022, the directors of Dentrix decided to construct a building in a prominent location in
Johannesburg, for the purposes of renting it to dental practitioners and medical doctors. The company
had never been in the property letting business, but the directors believe that this would generate
additional income for the company. The building was completed on 1 August 2022. On
1 September 2022 the company managed to secure various tenants that signed lease agreements
effective from 1 October 2022.
Dentrix incurred the following amounts during the 2022 year of assessment:
Note:
The insurance broker advised the company to pay the insurance premiums in advance and as a
result, Dentrix paid the premiums on 1 August 2022, for 24 months. The insurance cover was effective
from 1 August 2022. The insurance amount was incurred evenly throughout the 24-month period.
5. The directors of Dentrix decided to donate dental supplies to Dr John Black’s personal dental practice
(sole proprietor business) to be used as consumables for the pro bono work he performs in his
personal dental practice (the consumables were not donated to Dr Black in his capacity as a
shareholder of Dentrix). No advertisement benefit arose from this donation. Dr Black’s personal
dental practice is not a registered vendor for VAT purposes. On the date of the donation
(30 June 2023) the open market value of the dental supplies was R45 000 and the cost price was
R32 000. This is the first donation made by the company since its inception.
142
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 13 (continued)
REQUIRED: Marks
Sub- Total
total
(i) Calculate the taxable income of Dentrix (Pty) Ltd for its
2023 year of assessment. Start your calculation with the preliminary taxable
income of R32 500 550 and incorporate transactions 1 to 3 only into your
calculation of the taxable income. Show all calculations.
(ii) Discuss the income tax effect of transaction 4 for Dentrix (Pty) Ltd in
respect of its 2022 and 2023 years of assessment. Ignore the rental
income in your discussion. Support your discussion with references to
relevant legislation. Show all calculations. 16
Assume that the tax legislation for the 2023 year of assessment also applied
in the 2022 year of assessment.
Total marks 40
(Test 2 TAX4862 2019 – adapted)
143
TAX4862/105/2023
b. New machine
Cost
Purchase price R960 000 x 100/115 834 783 (1)
Installation costs –
consultant R83 000 x 100/115 72 174 (1)
906 957
S 12C allowance R906 957 x 40% (362 783) (1)
(iii) Marks
• Trading stock has been applied for the purposes of making a donation This is a deemed
recoupment in terms of s 22(8)(b)(i) – note that proviso (d) to section 22(8) will no longer (1)
be applicable, since it only applies to section 22(8)(b)(iv). The recoupment is at market
value of R45 000 x 100/115 = R39 130. (1)
• Dentrix will not qualify for a section 18A deduction, as it is not a donation to a public (1)
benefit organisation (no s18A certificate obtained).
• Donations tax at 20% x R39 130 = R7 826 will be payable by Dentrix on 31 July 2023. (2)
• Connected person rule applies as Mr John Black is a connected person that cannot claim (1)
full input tax (non-vendor) and sale is for less than open market value. (1)
o Output tax: R45 000 x 15/115 = R5 870 (1)
Available 8
Communication skills: Clarity of expression 1
Max 6
147
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 14 40 marks
Part A 32 marks
Bio-green (Pty) Ltd is a resident company that produces and supplies bio-fuel (i.e. the production of bio-
ethanol and bio-diesel) locally within South Africa’s borders. Bio-green’s factory is located in Gqeberha
(formerly Port Elizabeth) in the Eastern Cape. Bio-green has a September year-end and is a category C VAT
vendor. The equity share capital in Bio-green is held as follows:
• 90% by Bio-green Suppliers Plc (Suppliers Plc), a non-resident company incorporated in France.
• 10% by Bio-green Distributors SA (Pty) Ltd (Distributors), a resident company also with a September
year-end and registered for VAT with 1-month tax periods. Distributors is wholly owned by Suppliers
Plc. Distributors’ head office is in Polokwane in Limpopo, South Africa.
You are in the process of preparing Bio-green’s IT14 income tax return for the 2023 year of assessment. Bio-
green’s preliminary taxable income is R8 320 600, before taking into account the information under
notes 1 to 6 below. All amounts below include VAT, unless specifically stated or implied otherwise.
Notes
1. On 1 March 2023 Bio-green sold 55 000 litres of bio-diesel to a new customer (a South African
independent party) for R567 600 (i.e. R10,32 per litre). The normal price per litre is R14,74 and the
open market value for 55 000 litres of bio-diesel on 1 March 2023 was R810 700. Bio-green fixed the
selling price below market value in order to promote its business to the new customer (assume the
sale was in the ordinary course of Bio-green’s trade). The cost of production of the bio-diesel has
already been taken into account in the calculation of the preliminary taxable income amount.
2. Bio-green imported a fully automated bio-diesel processor from its French holding company,
Suppliers Plc, for €10,560. Suppliers Plc supplies this type of processor to other parties at a fixed
price of €13,200. The processor was shipped free on board (FOB) on 15 August 2023 and was
delivered at Bio-green’s premises on 25 September 2023 and brought into use on the same day. The
correct amount of VAT was paid (and claimed as input tax) and import duties of R11 000 were paid
on importation. No forward exchange contract or foreign currency option contract was entered into to
hedge the purchase price. Bio-green paid 50% of the purchase price on 25 September 2023. The
other 50% of the purchase price is only payable on 25 October 2023. It is standard practice for
Suppliers Plc to provide its customers with an interest-free 30-day credit term.
3. Bio-green purchased its factory building in Gqeberha from a developer at a market-related price
of R4.6 million on 20 April 2021.
148
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 14 (continued)
4. From 1 June 2021 Bio-green leased a computer from a South African information technology (IT)
company (independent party) for a monthly rental of R2 000 (exclusive of VAT). The total cost
price of the computer to the IT company was R28 750 (exclusive of VAT). The 2-year rental
agreement expired on 31 May 2023, but Bio-green was allowed to continue using the computer
from 1 June 2023 for a monthly rental of R100 (exclusive of VAT). SARS Binding General Ruling
No. 7 (or Interpretation Note No. 47) provides for a 3-year write-off period for computers.
5. Bio-green acquired a bio-diesel production patent at an arm’s length price of R890 000 (exclusive
of VAT), after seeking advice from its legal advisor. The patent was purchased on 20 July 2023
and brought into use on 1 September 2023. Bio-green received an invoice on 10 August 2023
from its legal advisor for a general legal opinion regarding all the legal implications of acquiring a
patent. Bio-green paid the invoiced amount of R52 095 on 17 August 2023 and claimed the correct
amount of input tax in its August 2023 tax (VAT) period.
Part B 8 marks
Bio-green and Distributors are connected persons. During the 2021 year of assessment, Bio-green
wanted to expand its operations and did not have the necessary reserves to do so. Accordingly, Bio-
green obtained funding from Distributors. Distributors issued a loan to Bio-green on 1 June 2021, at a
market-related interest rate, with interest payable per annum. Although Bio-green pays the interest on
the loan to Distributors, Bio-green has no obligation to repay the capital sum of the loan. The loan is also
not repayable on demand. Furthermore, Bio-green has no right to convert or exchange the loan for
shares.
149
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 14 (continued)
PART A
REQUIRED: Marks
Sub- Total
total
(i) Calculate the normal tax liability of Bio-green (Pty) Ltd for its 2023 year of
assessment by taking notes 1 to 6 into account. Start your answer with the
preliminary taxable income of R8 320 600.
Address all items for which notes are provided and show all the workings. If an
item has no effect on the taxable income, provide a reason. 22
(ii) Refer to note 1 under part A: Indicate, supported by a reason, how your answer
will differ if Bio-green (Pty) Ltd sold the 55 000 litres of bio-diesel to Bio-green
Distributors SA (Pty) Ltd for R567 600. Assume the sale below market value was
not in the ordinary course of Bio-green (Pty) Ltd’s trade. 3
(iii) Refer to note 2 under part A: Explain and fully justify your answer, with reference
to legislation, if your calculation under (i) will differ if the payment terms of the
purchase price for the automated bio-diesel processor were as follows:
No forward exchange contract or foreign currency option contract was entered into
to hedge the purchase price. Bio-green paid 50% of the purchase price on
25 September 2023. The other 50% of the purchase price is only payable on
25 October 2024. 6
PART B
REQUIRED: Marks
Sub- Total
total
Discuss, in terms of the relevant legislation, whether the interest-bearing loan
constitutes a hybrid debt instrument and provide the normal tax implications of the
interest payable in respect of the loan for both the issuer of the interest-bearing
instrument (Bio-green (Pty) Ltd) and the holder (Bio-green Distributors SA (Pty)
Ltd). 7
PART A(i)
R
Preliminary taxable income 8 320 600
1. Sale of bio-diesel to new customer - gross income 567 600 (1)
(VAT is included at 0%, zero-rated supply ito s 11(1)(h) of VAT Act)
[Note: not a problem that sale is below market value, because not connected
persons.]
6. Capital loss of R380 900 brought forward from 2022 – no capital gains in
current year to offset against, carry forward to 2024 (par 9(c) of the 8th - (1)
Schedule)
Taxable income 8 548 592
Normal tax @ 27% 2 308 120 (1)
Available 24
Max 22
151
TAX4862/105/2023
PART A(ii)
The trading stock is disposed of to a holder of shares, otherwise than in the ordinary (1)
course of trade for a consideration less than market value. Section 22(8)(b)(ii) of
the Income Tax Act applies and there must be a recoupment of the market value
of the stock (s 22(8)(B)). The open market value of R810 700 includes VAT at 0%;
thus the recoupment added back in the calculation of Bio-green’s taxable income
at market value will be limited to R810 700. Since the stock was sold to Bio-green
Distributors, an amount of R567 600 will be included as sales or turnover for tax 567 600 (1)
purposes and therefore the recoupment under section 22(8) will be limited to the
difference of the market value of R810 700 and the selling price of R567 600 (VAT
at 0%) thus R243 100 (proviso (b) to section 22(8)). 243 100 (1)
Total 3
PART A(iii)
Yes, the calculation will be different as a result of the application of section 24I(10A) of the (2)
Income Tax Act.
The realised foreign exchange loss of R264 in respect of the 50% of the purchase price that was
paid remains the same and is deducted in Bio-green’s 2023 tax calculation. (1)
However, the unrealised foreign exchange difference at year-end, i.e. the gain of R528, in respect
of the outstanding balance of 50% of the purchase price which is only payable on
25 October 2024, is not added to income in the 2023 year of assessment and the foreign
exchange gain of R528 is deferred and will only be recognised once the exchange item is realised (1)
(paid).
Section 24I(10A)(a) applies as follows:
• Bio-green and Bio-green Plc are connected persons (or form part of the same group of (1)
companies) (section 24I(10A)(a)(i)(aa)), and
• The debt is not hedged (section 24I(10A)(a)(i)(bb), and (1)
• No part of the exchange item represents a current liability for IFRS reporting purposes at (1)
the 2023 year-end – loan only repayable on 25 October 2024 (will not be classified as a
current liability since the outstanding amount will be outstanding for a period of more than
12 months after year end and not a current liability ito IAS 1.69)
(section 24I(10A)(a)(ii)(aa), and
• The debt is not funded by any debt owed to any person that does not form part of the (1)
same group of companies or a connected person (section 24I(10A)(a)(ii)(bb).
Communication skill – clarity of expression (1)
Available 9
Max 7
152
TAX4862/105/2023
Part B
Section 8F of the Income Tax Act is an anti-avoidance provision which deals with hybrid debt (1)
instruments.
A “hybrid debt instrument” is defined in section 8F(1) as an instrument in respect of which a
company owes an amount during a year of assessment (that is, the loan owing by Bio-green)
and is an arrangement that meets any one of the three conditions mentioned in paragraph (a); (1)
(b) or (c) of the definition of a “hybrid debt instrument”. Paragraph (c) applies to the loan in (1)
question, i.e.:
The company (Bio-green) owes the amount to a connected person (Bio-green Distributors)
and the company is not obliged to redeem the instrument within 30 years from the date of (1)
issue of the instrument. Furthermore, the instrument is not repayable on demand.
There are a number of exclusions where section 8F does not apply, namely where the debt:
Is owed by a small business corporation as defined;
Is a tier 1 or 2 capital instrument issued by a bank or a controlling company in relation to the
bank;
Is owed by a long or short term insurer;
constitutes linked units in a company held by a long or short term insurer, a REIT, a pension
or a provident fund; or
is a third-party backed instrument. (1)
None of the above exclusions in terms of section 8F(3) apply to the debt in question.
Thus, the interest-bearing loan in question is a hybrid debt instrument. (1)
The interest paid by Bio-green to Bio-green Distributors is deemed to be a dividend in specie and
no deduction is allowed from income (s 8F(2)(b)). (1)
The interest received by Bio-green Distributors is deemed to be a dividend in specie received on
the last day of the year of assessment of Bio-green and the dividend is included in gross income (1)
(s 8F(2)(a)) (1)
However, the dividend is exempt from normal tax in terms of section 10(1)(k)(i).
Communication skill – clarity of expression (1)
Available 10
Max 8
153
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 15 40 marks
Part A 36 marks
Global Glass (Pty) Ltd (“Global Glass”) is a South African resident company that manufactures, cuts, and
sells glass and glassware products both locally and across the border, exporting to certain African countries
such as Botswana, Kenya and Nigeria.
Global Glass is a wholly-owned subsidiary of GG Glassware (Pty) Ltd (“GG Glassware”), also resident in
South Africa. GG Glassware purifies sand for purposes of the glass manufacture by Global Glass. The
purification of sand and the manufacture of glass are both recognised by the South African Revenue Service
(SARS) as a process of manufacture. Global Glass has been trading since 15 April 2017 and has more than
one hundred employees mainly working in the glass factory.
GG Glassware was established in January 2017 by Mr Frame. In March 2017 Mr Frame donated 15% shares
in GG Glassware to each of his three sons; Lucky, Happy and Success, at the time 18, 16 and 15 years old
respectively. Mr Frame, Lucky, Happy and Success are all South African residents.
Mr Frame (with a 55%-shareholding), Lucky, Happy and Success (each with a 15%-shareholding) are the
sole directors of GG Glassware and Global Glass. Both GG Glassware and Global Glass have a December
financial year-end and are registered VAT vendors, making 100% taxable supplies.
For the financial year ended 31 December 2023, the two group companies’ accountant, Ms Y, has prepared
the preliminary tax calculations for Global Glass and GG Glassware respectively. The preliminary taxable
income for Global Glass as determined amounts to R18 770 000. The following transactions have not yet
been taken into account in the taxable income of R18 770 000. All amounts include VAT where appropriate
unless specifically stated or implied otherwise. Also, apart from any transactions within the group, all other
transactions are between independent parties.
Notes:
1. On 1 September 2023 Global Glass sold and directly exported manufactured glass to a regular
customer in Nigeria. The total sales reflected on the invoice was R3 550 500. Global Glass
received 50% of the selling price on 30 September 2023, but the remaining 50% was still
outstanding at year-end. Global Glass has a 30-day credit term for its credit sales and interest is
charged on any outstanding payment balance, effective from the first day after the 30 days have
expired, at an annual market-related interest rate of 5%. Global Glass’ normal credit terms applied
to this transaction and the 30-day period expired on 30 September 2023.
2. Global Glass purchased its factory building on 1 April 2017 for R2 500 000 and brought it into use
upon the commencement of trade (15 April 2017). The seller (a non-vendor) used the building as
a storage facility.
3. On 20 August 2019 Global Glass purchased a vacant piece of land at a public auction for
R650 000 (excluding VAT) intending to erect a second factory building. However, due to economic
hardship, the building was not erected, but instead, Global Glass changed its intention in
February 2023, when the market value of the land was R2 700 000 (excluding VAT) and decided
to enter into a profit-making scheme and to subdivide the vacant land in ten (10) smaller industrial
plots. Global Glass proceeded with its plans and the land was subdivided into ten plots at a total
cost of R350 000 (excluding VAT), and the ten plots were sold on 18 May 2023 for a total selling
price of R3 200 000, excluding VAT (the market value of the land on this date was R2 850 000
(excluding VAT)).
154
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 15 (continued)
4. Global Glass bought 30 apartments (of a total of 50 apartments) in a newly erected residential
building directly from the developer (a registered VAT vendor) on 1 December 2020 for R350 000
each. The apartments were rented out by Global Glass to its employees as from 1 January 2021
for a monthly rental of R3 500. The monthly rental for each of the 30 apartments escalated to
R3 850 with effect from 1 January 2022 and as from 1 January 2023, the monthly rental payable
to Global Glass by its employees amounts to R4 235 per apartment.
5. On 1 April 2023 GG Glassware sold a manufacturing machine to Global Glass for R460 000
(excluding VAT). The market value of the machine on the date of sale was R500 000 (excluding
VAT). GG Glassware originally acquired the machine for R960 000 in 2021. Global Glass brought
the machine into use in its manufacturing process immediately on the date of purchase.
6. On 1 November 2023 Global Glass ordered a new colour laser printer from a supplier in the United
States of America (USA), for $1 800. The printer was shipped free on board on 15 November 2023
and arrived in South Africa a week later, on 22 November 2023. Global Glass paid VAT of R4 020
and import duty of R4 500 and the printer was immediately cleared through customs. The printer was
brought into use for the administration of the business on 1 December 2023. On this same day
(1 December 2023) Global Glass entered into a 2-month forward exchange contract (FEC) with a
South African bank to serve as a hedge in respect of the debt. Global Glass settled the full debt on
31 January 2024.
SARS allows a five year (5) write-off period on this type of equipment in terms of Binding General
Ruling No 7 (or Interpretation Note No.47).
7. Global Glass paid a cash dividend of R1 200 000 to its holder of shares (GG Glassware) on
15 December 2023.
Part B 4 marks
QUESTION 15 (continued)
PART A
REQUIRED Marks
Sub- Total
total
(i) Calculate the normal tax liability of Global Glass (Pty) Ltd for its year of
assessment ended 31 December 2023 by taking into account transactions 1 to
7 in Part A. Commence your tax calculation with the preliminary taxable income
of R18 770 000.
Show all your calculations and if an amount has no effect on Global Glass (Pty)
Ltd’s tax calculation for its 2023 year of assessment, indicate this together with
the relevant motivation/reason.
A mark will be awarded for reference to the relevant legislation. In your answer,
also indicate when the tax(es) (excluding normal/income tax), if any, are payable.
Ignore Value-Added Tax and any DTA that may apply. 9
Assume that the tax legislation applicable to the 2023 year of assessment will
apply to any other relevant year of assessment.
PART B
REQUIRED Marks
Sub- Total
total
Share your view on this matter and advise Ms Y on the matter of collaboration
between her two friends in the Audit assignment and any action that should be
taken by her. 3
PART A(i)
R
Preliminary taxable income of Global Glass (given) 18 770 000
1. Sales – gross income (earlier of receipt or accrual – 50% received, but 3 550 500 (1)
remaining 50% accrued)
(direct exports are zero-rated (s 11(1)(a)), VAT thus included at 0%)
Interest accrued ito s 24J:
50% x R3 550 500 x 5% x 92/365 = 22 373 (2)
2. Less: no s 13(1) building allowance is available as the seller was not - (2)
entitled to allowance (used building as a storage facility)
4. Rental income = gross income: R4 235 x 30 (apartments) x 12 months 1 524 600 (1)
Less: s 13sex allowance: R350 000 x 30 x 55% x 10% (577 500) (3)
(Note: these are low-cost residential units as defined – an apartment with a
cost of R350 000 and the cost on which the 1% rental limitation is
calculated is increased by 10% annually and falls within the limit.)
6. Purchase price of printer – not deductible ito ss 11(a) & 23(g) as capital: - (1)
Less: s 11(e) allowance:
R
Cost: $1,800 x R14,60 (s 25D) 26 280 (1)
Add: Import duties 4 500 (1)
(VAT – no effect, input tax claimed) - (1)
30 780
Brought into use on 1 December 2023, therefore: R30 780 / 5 x 31/365 = (523) (1)
(or alternative: R30 780 / 5 x 1/12 = R513 if calc in months)
7. Cash dividend of R1.2 million - distribution of reserves (not in the production - (1)
of income)
No other capital gains or losses, add capital gain under note 3: 1 640 000 (1)
Taxable income 24 986 910
Normal tax @ 27% 6 746 466 (1)
Available 27
Max 26
PART A(ii)
The manufactured glass constitutes Global Glass’ trading stock and the selling price of
R3 550 500 is included in Global Glass’ gross income in its 2023 year of assessment. (1)
However, the transaction is between Global Glass, a SA resident, and the Nigerian customer,
a non-resident, for the benefit of either or both parties; they are connected persons (given)
and the sale was concluded at below market value and thus, a term of the transaction is
different from a term that would have existed had the parties been independent persons (1)
dealing at arm’s length. This transaction therefore constitutes an “affected transaction” (1)
as defined in section 31(1) of the Income Tax Act. (1)
In terms of section 31(2), where an affected transaction results in a tax benefit for a party to the
transaction, the taxable income of the person deriving a tax benefit from the transaction
must be calculated as if the transaction had been entered into on arm’s length terms and (1)
conditions (the so-called “primary transfer pricing adjustment”).
Global Glass derived a tax benefit from the sale transaction because the selling price is lower (1)
than the market value (arm’s length price) (thus a reduced gross income inclusion). The
section 31(2) adjustment (primary transfer pricing adjustment) that must be made is (1)
therefore the difference between the market value (arm’s length price (R3 850 500) and
the selling price (R3 550 500), i.e. R3 850 500 less R3 550 500 = R300 000 and this amount
must be included in Global Glass’ taxable income for its 2023 year of assessment. (1)
In terms of section 31(3), the primary transfer pricing adjustment of R300 000 is deemed to be
a dividend in specie declared and paid by Global Glass (second transfer pricing adjustment). (1)
This dividend in specie is deemed to have been declared and paid on the last day of the period
of six months after the end of the year of assessment in respect of which the adjustment is
made, i.e. the dividend in specie will be deemed to have been paid by Global Glass on (1)
30 June 2024.
Global Glass will therefore be liable for dividends tax of R300 000 x 20% = R60 000 and this (1)
amount must be paid over to SARS by 31 July 2024. (1)
Communication skills – clarity of expression 1
Available 13
Max 10
158
TAX4862/105/2023
PART B
The suspected collaboration in question (i.e., if the students indeed collaborated), constitutes
plagiarism or cheating; it is seen as theft; they are basically stealing work that is not their own
and presenting it as their own. Students have the responsibility to uphold academic integrity
(principles). If the students have collaborated in respect of the assignment, it is a violation of
academic integrity. They have acted dishonestly. It is a contravention of university policy/ies
(Policy on Academic Integrity for example). It is wrong. It is unethical. (2)
Ms Y should not merely ignore this. As a CA(SA), she has the responsibility to act as a good
corporate citizen and to maintain and enhance the profession’s reputation. Ms Y has the moral
obligation (responsibility) to either talk to them and ask them to notify their relevant lecturer (or
department) of their collaboration or report the matter herself. The students also have a moral
obligation to report their misconduct. They need to come forward with the truth if they
collaborated. As said, Ms Y should otherwise report the matter herself – she can contact the
Audit department directly and inform any of the lecturers / or the school/college
management/anyone at the institution. There should then be an investigation and if it is proven
that there was collaboration/misconduct based on the evidence, or if the students admitted to
this misconduct, a disciplinary hearing could follow or they can be found guilty and the
necessary steps be taken by the institution. Ms Y could also decide to report the matter to (2)
SAICA (SAICA has professional authority over accounting students).
Communication skills – logical argument 1
Available 5
Max 3
___________________________
END OF SECTION B
159
TAX4862/105/2023
PURPOSE STATEMENT
SECTION C contains the test from the previous year. The objectives of this section are to
• assist you in familiarising yourself with the format in which the tests (summative assessments) are
set out
• provide an opportunity to apply your knowledge under exam conditions and practise your exam
technique
Before starting this section, familiarise yourself with the assessment procedures in TL101 (8.1 to 8.3.1).
The scope of test 2 covers mainly TL105 topics, as well as the relevant court cases in TL102.
Aspects of previous tutorial letters (e.g. VAT in TL103) may also be tested; however, they
will not be the main focus of test 2.
Attempt the test under exam conditions now that you have been through the self-
assessment questions in part B. Share your solution on the myUnisa discussion forum, then
refer to the outcomes (solution) that will be made available on myUnisa (lesson tool) on the
Friday of your study week.
160
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION 40 marks
Dwell (Pty) Ltd (“Dwell”) is a South African resident company that manufactures computers that are sold
to local and international customers. The manufacture of computers is recognised by the South African
Revenue Service (SARS) as a process of manufacture. The company has a year of assessment ending
on 31 December and is a category A registered Value-Added Tax (VAT) vendor making 100% taxable
supplies.
Voting rights are conferred to each holder of shares (“shareholder”) in proportion to the equity
shareholding. Dwell had the following shareholders throughout the company’s 2023 year of assessment:
Shane Howard and John Dlomo have acted as the directors of the company since 1 January 2014 and
are therefore substantially involved in the operations of Dwell. None of the directors are VAT vendors.
The market value of Dwell’s assets is R7 000 000 on 31 December 2023.
On 1 August 2023 Dwell ordered 5 000 motherboards from Pacer Plc, a company in China, for 15 000 Yen
each. The stock was shipped free on board on 31 August 2023 on which date Dwell paid 50% of the
purchase price. The stock arrived in South Africa on 30 September 2023 and was delivered at Dwell’s
premises on 10 October 2023. Dwell paid import duty of R6 000 as well as the necessary VAT on
30 September 2023, when the stock was cleared through customs. It was agreed that Dwell would settle
the purchase price, together with interest levied on the purchase price at a market related interest rate of
10% per annum (calculated from 1 September 2023), on 1 March 2024. Pacer Plc’s normal selling price
is 10 000 Yen each for these motherboards. At year-end all of this stock was used in manufacturing
computers and all of these computers have been sold.
John Dlomo
John Dlomo (“John”) is 60 years old and a resident of South Africa. Except for his 10% interest in Dwell
the only other business asset that John holds is his 10% interest in Printers Pty Ltd (“Printers”), which he
acquired during 2015 for R150 000. John has been substantially involved in the operations of Printers
since this date. During the 2023 year of assessment John started to experience problems with his health
and decided to sell his interest in Dwell as well as in Printers. His interests in the companies were sold
on 31 December 2023 for R 6 500 000 (R4 000 000 for his interest in Dwell and R2 500 000 for his
interest in Printers). The market value of Printers’ assets was R2 500 000 on 31 December 2023.
Asus (Pty) Ltd (“Asus”) borrowed R5 000 000 from ICT Bank on 1 February 2022. Interest on the loan is
payable at 12% per annum. Asus used R2 000 000 of the amount on 1 April 2022 to buy a vacant plot of
land in Durban on which the company intended to build a new office building.
[TURN OVER]
161
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION (continued)
The balance of R3 000 000 was used to buy a new manufacturing machine for the manufacturing of
components that are used in the manufacturing of computers. The manufacturing machine was
purchased and brought into use on 1 May 2022. Due to floods in the close vicinity of the vacant plot of
land Asus never commenced with the construction of the office building and had to sell the plot of land to
cover other expenses incurred due to the floods. The plot of land was sold for R1 350 000 on 1 December
2022. Due to financial difficulties Asus paid the correct amount of interest on 31 December 2022 but made
no other repayments on the loan. To assist, ICT Bank cancelled R3 500 000 of the R5 000 000 debt and
the amount of interest for the 2023 year of assessment on 31 December 2023. R1 500 000 of the
R3 500 000 debt benefit is attributable to the vacant plot of land and R2 000 000 of the debt benefit is
attributable to the manufacturing machine.
H Plus (Pty) Ltd (“H Plus”) is a company resident in South Africa for income tax purposes and has a year
of assessment ending on 31 December. The company is a residential property developer, as defined in
the VAT Act and is a category A registered VAT vendor making 100% taxable supplies. The construction
of residential property qualifies as a process of manufacture.
Additional information
1. The ruling exchange rates are as follows:
Exchange rate
10 August 2023 1 Yen = R 0.11
31 August 2023 1 Yen = R 0.12
30 September 2023 1 Yen = R 0.15
10 October 2023 1 Yen = R 0.14
31 December 2023 1 Yen = R 0.13
Average rate for the 2023 year of assessment 1 Yen = R 0.14
2. SARS allows a five (5) year write-off period on the manufacturing equipment acquired by Asus in
terms of Binding General Ruling No 7 (or Interpretation Note No. 47).
162
TAX4862/105/2023
QUESTION (continued)
REQUIRED Marks
Sub- Total
Total
(i) Dwell (Pty) Ltd - Purchase of stock from Pacer Plc
Calculate the amounts to be included in, or deducted from, the taxable
income of Dwell (Pty) Ltd for the company’s 2023 year of assessment.
Clearly indicate whether an amount is included in, or deducted from, the
taxable income. You can assume that interest is translated to rand by using 10
the spot rate at the end of the year of assessment.
(ii) John Dlomo
Discuss, supported by calculations and reference to legislation, the income 11
tax implications for John Dlomo of the sale of his business interests.
Assume that John made no other disposals during his 2023 year of
assessment.
1 12
Communication skill: clarity of expression
(iii) Asus (Pty) Ltd
Calculate the amounts to be included in, or deducted from, the taxable
income of Asus (Pty) Ltd for the company’s 2023 year of assessment.
Clearly indicate whether an amount is included in, or deducted from, the 10
taxable income. Ignore any VAT implications.
(iv) H Plus (Pty) Ltd
Discuss, supported by calculations, all the income tax implications for H
Plus (Pty) Ltd of the information provided in respect of the residential 7
development.
Communication skill: clarity of expression 1 8
TOTAL 40
____________________________________
END OF TUTORIAL LETTER
©
UNISA
2023