Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SSRN Id3211745
SSRN Id3211745
Monetary Stability∗
James L. Caton†
September 27, 2018
Abstract
The development of blockchain and cryptocurrency may alleviate the
economic strain associated with recession. Economic recessions tend
to be aggregate demand driven, meaning that they are caused by
fluctuations in the supply of or demand for money. Holding mone-
tary policy as solution assumes that stability must arise from outside
of the economic system. Under a policy regime that allows innova-
tions in blockchain to develop, blockchain technology may promote a
money supply that is responsive to changes in demand to hold money.
This work suggests that cryptocurrencies present an opportunity to
profitably implement rules that promote macroeconomic stability. In
particular, cryptocurrency that is asset-backed may provide a means
for cheaply attaining liquidity during a crisis.
2.1 Money
2.2 Blockchain
2.3 Cryptocurrency
Mt Vt = Pt yt (1)
Mt Vt
yt = (2)
Pt
In equilibrium the observed value of real income is equal to the value that is
sustainable in the long-run:
yt = y0 (3)
Mt Vt = Pt y0 (4)
3
Long-run is defined as the state that will be reach absent exogenous shocks to the
model. It is not a reference to a particular or even a potential range of time.
yt 6= y0 (5)
And therefore:
Mt Vt 6= Pt y0 (6)
In order for the market to clear, the classical macroeconomic model (see
Snowdon and Vane 2005; Clower and Leijonhufvud 1981) demands that the
price level adjust to offset the discrepancy between Mt Vt and Pt y0 .
y0 − yt > 0 (7)
Mt Vt < Pt y0 (8)
Not all goods available for sale are purchased in this case so that there exists
an excess supply of non-money goods where, Pt yt , the nominal value of goods
purchased is less than Pt y0 , the nominal value required to purchase all goods
at price level Pt .
Pt y 0
Mt < (9)
Vt
1
Substitute kt for Vt
:
Mt < Pt y0 kt (10)
Read left to right, this states that the existing stock of money is less than
quantity of money demanded as defined by a combination of transaction
demand for money, Pt y0 , and portfolio demand for money, kt . In the case of
an aggregate demand driven recession, the existing money stock is insufficient
to purchase all goods available for sale in light of the preference of the average
agent to hold money. If Equation 10 is divided by the price level (as in
equation 5A), either M must increase or P fall for all goods to be sold, thus
allowing yt to rise to the level y0 .
10
11
12
13
The protocol for increase in the quantity of bitcoin has features similar to
the k-percent rule. Although the quantity of bitcoin does not increase by
some percent, it does grow at a constant rate in terms of units of bitcoin.
5
For discussion of Bitcoin protocol, see Antonopoulos (2014)
6
GitHub: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/08a7316c144f9f2516db8fa62400893f4358c5ae/src/amount.h
(Accessed June 5, 2018)
14
15
16
17
Money
Money may exist as base money or as substitutes for base money like de-
posit accounts or other highly liquid assets. Standard analysis describes the
creation of credit money and near-moneys in terms of higher level monetary
aggregates (M1 , M2 , etc. . . ). In this case one may think of cryptocurrencies
as supplementing the existing stock of money. It is useful to think of the de-
18
The quickness with which these money substitutes can be created makes
cryptocurrency a valuable asset for those seeking liquidity. As the quantity
of substitutes for base money increases, the velocity of base money also in-
creases. This is significant for the mitigation of short-run disequilibrium. A
long tradition of research in macroeconomics recognizes the significance of
liquidity costs in affecting the value of financial instruments (Keynes 1930;
Glasner 1989, 144; Hicks 1989, 55-79; White 1999, 14) and liquidity shortage
driving crisis dynamics (Keynes 1936; Diamond and Dybvig 1983; Yeager
1956, 444-446).
19
The velocity of the base, or equivalently, portfolio demand for base money
is itself a function of the credit stock. An net increase in the credit stock tends
negatively influences demand for base money. Money that is not base money
is itself a substitute for base money. Thus, a shift in money holdings from
base money to non-base money is equivalent to a shifting of demand away
from base money. Financial markets tend to respond to such a demand by
creation of new instruments. Assuming that the base is static, an increase
in the quantity (MT − MB ) translates directly to an increase in VB and,
equivalently, a fall in kB .
Deposit and money market accounts along with highly liquid securities
like U.S. treasury notes service demand for liquidity. It is not uncommon for
interest rates on highly liquid instruments to become depressed preceding a
recession (Chinn and Kucko 2015; Longstaff 2001). This occurred during the
Great Recession with the rate of return on U.S. Treasuries beginning a steep
decline more than 6 months before the last recession.10 This represented a
10
Erdogan, et al., (2015) note:
The use of a US government yield curve arguably makes sense for pre-
dicting crises or recessions because it is forward looking and implicitly
20
Assets that serve as a store of value and are also a low cost means to
accessing money can help alleviate a fall in demand for money. The existence
of near-moneys, money-like assets, may offset autonomous changes in demand
to hold money. The cost of holding money is the gain foregone by not holding
other assets (Friedman 1956). For example, the holding of money in a savings
account yields a small amount of interest with very low cost in terms of loss
projects future risk-free interest rates, in the context of a highly liquid
and informationally efficient market. . . Lower forward interest rates
indicate current market expectations of falling future short-term in-
terest rates. This in turn could reflect lower expected inflation premia
or, more relevant to the topic at hand, lower expected real interest
rates (or lower required risk-free real returns) associated with a slack
economic environment, or both. A closely related interpretation is
that government securities provide a haven from prospective credit
problems in the event of a recession, causing the prices of treasuries
to rise as investors flee risk, accepting low or even negative interest
rates as the price of safety. (408)
21
Although cryptocurrencies are not credit money, they can operate accord-
ing to the same dynamics as the financial instruments discussed above. With
the appropriate monetary rules, they can even be more effective than stan-
dard financial markets in responding to increases in demand for currency,
especially during a crisis.
During an economic crisis, demand to hold money increases such that not
all available goods can be sold (Equations 7-10). Cryptocurrencies that can
increase the money stock during a crisis serve can both increase their adoption
and stabilize aggregate demand purely through market mechanisms. Given
the rules that are reviewed above, the most promising in this respect are
asset backed currencies. While the particular details of any cryptocurrency
protocol differ, these currencies can promote monetary expansion to the ex-
tent that assets can be registered on a blockchain and, presumably, there
exist no competing claim for the portion of the assets value that is converted
22
23
The role of the entrepreneur is to overcome uncertainty and bear the cost
of doing so (Knight 1921; Foss and Klein 2012). It is to learn in the broadest
sense of the word. Entrepreneurship In his classic article, “Uncertainty, Evo-
lution, and Economic Theory”, Alchian (1950) reasons that economic agents
need not be perfectly knowledgeable and, in fact, cannot know beforehand
the solutions that the market will generate. Competitive processes, through
24
25
26
27
Fiscal policy in the form of the tax code can create disjunctions in finan-
cial markets. Investors may demand a premium for stocks acquired in an
acquisition in order to offset losses that will be incurred by a capital gains
tax (Ayers, Lefanowicz, and Robinson 2003). More commonly, investors in
the U.S. tend to sell stocks that have incurred a loss during the year in De-
cember. The tax code incentivizes this as investors can write off losses from
these sales and pay less in taxes as a result (Blouin, Raedy, Shackelford 2003;
Mello, Ferris, and Hwang 2003; Jin 2006). Other financial instruments that
provide more liquidity to the market, like ETFs, are subject to similar tax
treatment.
28
29
8 Conclusion
30
1
PM = (1A)
P
The average price of money is the inverse of the price level. As the price of
money goes up, the price level goes down and vice versa.
Supply and demand for money work much as supply and demand for other
goods. However, since money represents half of every exchange, we find that
demand for money is a function of demand for other goods in addition to
demand to hold money over a given period of time. The demand function
31
MV = P y (2A)
In its elementary form, the equation equates aggregate demand, total expen-
ditures, with aggregate supply, the value of marketable non-money goods in
the economy. In the long-run , all goods available for sale will be purchased.
The product of the existing stock of money (M ) and the average rate at
which each dollar is spent (V ) is equal to the real value of goods (y) adjusted
for changes in the price level (P ).
The equation can be rewritten such that the existing stock, or supply, of
money is a function of the remaining variables P ,y and V , which together
comprise the total demand for money.
Py
M= (3A)
V
1
V
can be rewritten as k, portfolio demand for money which is the average
portion of one’s money holdings that he or she withholds from expenditure.
The other form of demand for money, transactions demand, is represented
by P y, the product of the price level and stock of real goods. The supply of
money is a function of demand to spend money and demand to hold money
32
M = P yk (4A)
This description of money demand must be nuanced further given the long-
run endogeneity of the price level. The price level is a function of the money
stock in the long run (Friedman 1970) as portfolio demand tends to be stable
over long periods of time. Even if portfolio demand for money is not perfectly
stable, the velocity of the effective base tends to move much more slowly than
the money stock. In a commodity money economy, the price level is mean
reverting (Mazumder and Wood 2013; White 1999) with the rate of growth
of the nominal money stock tending to match the real rate of growth in the
long-run.
To account for the possibility of a changing price level, we describe the level
of real cash balances by accounting for changes in the price level. We rewrite
to isolate the two factors driving demand for money in a system where the
money stock is not a choice variable for policy makers :
M
= yk (5A)
P
The supply of real cash balances is a function of real income and portfolio
demand for money, both of which are determined by autonomous factors.
This value can increase either by a change in the money stock, (M), or by
33
We are interested in the effect of a fall in the price level and its effect on
the money stock as deflations are commonly associated with dislocations in
credit markets and falls in productivity. The supply of real cash balances is a
function of demand for money to purchase real goods and portfolio demand
for money. Increases in demand for money exert a negative force on the
price level, which is an increase in the value of money. Under a commodity
money regime with an upward sloping supply curve, the nominal money stock
will increase as either quantity of real goods or demand to hold money (k)
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41