College Thesis Quantitative PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 126

STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE


WORKING STUDENTS

A Research Presented to the Faculty of the College of Accountancy,


Red Link Institute of Science and Technology,
Calamba City, Laguna

In Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of


Bachelor of Science in Accountancy

JAYSON C. CALATIN
ABEGIEL N. CAPUSO
JEWEL ROSE T. SOLIMAN
JILLIANNE ROSE T. SOLIMAN
SALVE C. SUCAB

January 2023
APPROVAL SHEET

This research entitled “STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE


OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE WORKING STUDENTS”, prepared
and submitted by Jayson C. Calatin, Abegiel N. Capuso, Jewel Rose T. Soliman,
Jillianne Rose T. Soliman, And Salve C. Sucab, in partial fulfilment of the
requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Accountancy, is hereby
recommended for oral defense.

PROF. EVANGELINE G. SAPNU, MBA, D Hum


Adviser

PANEL OF EXAMINERS

Accepted and examined by the Committee on Oral Examination with a


grade of _________ on ____________________, 2023.

JESS JAY M. SAJISE, DBA


Chairman

RENE N. ALTURA, Ph.D. NOEL P. MUNDA, MAEd


Member Member

Accepted and approved in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the


degree of Bachelor of Science in Accountancy.

JESS JAY M. SAJISE, DBA


VPAA/College Dean

i
ACKNOWLEDGMENT

First and foremost, to Almighty God for giving endless blessings throughout

the process of their research study, by providing and granting them the opportunity

the capability to accomplish their study successfully.

To Prof. Evangeline G. Sapnu, their research adviser, for giving them trust,

offering valuable advices, and giving support during the whole period of the study,

and especially for the patience and guidance during the writing process of the

manuscript.

To Dr. Jess Jay M. Sajise, their Chairperson of the board, Vice President

for Academic Affairs and College Dean, for sharing his expertise by giving

constructive comments and suggestions upon reviewing their study and

encouraging them to finish this piece of work.

To Dr. Rene N. Altura and Mr. Noel P. Munda, the members of the panel,

for their meaningful advice that guide them for the better result of the study.

The Grade 11 and Grade 12 Senior High School, Bachelor of Science in

Accountancy, Bachelor of Science in Accounting Information System and the

Bachelor of Technical-Vocational Teacher Education students of Red Link Institute

of Science & Technology, for their utmost cooperation and time given as

respondents of this study.

To Mr. Noel P. Munda, statistician for sharing his knowledge and helped in

the analysis of data and statistical computations.

ii
To Mr. Ronald E. Uy, grammarian, for his comments, effort in checking and

editing this study.

To the researchers’ families, friends and classmates, for their endless

moral, financial, and spiritual support.

C.J.C

A.N.C

J.R.T.S

J.R.T.S

S.C.S

iii
DEDICATION

“I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.”

- Proverbs 4:13

This thesis is wholeheartedly devoted to our adored guardians, who have

been our source of motivation and invigorated us when we considered

surrendering, who ceaselessly give their moral, profound, enthusiastic, and

monetary help.

To our siblings, sisters, family members, companions, schoolmates and

classmates who shared their words of exhortation, and support to complete this

examination.

Furthermore, finally, we devoted this study to the All-powerful God, thank you

for the guidance, strength, force of brain, assurance, and abilities, and for giving

us a sound life. These, we offer to you.

C.J.C

A.N.C

J.R.T.S

J.R.T.S

S.C.S

iv
ABSTRACT

The main purpose of this study is to: (1) Determine the level of Academic

Performance of the Senior High School and College Working students in Red Link

Institute of Science And Technology in terms of Learning, Motivation and Student

Behavior and (2) Determine if there a significant relationship between the

academic performance variables of Senior High School and College students.

The result of the study was obtained using the following Statistical

Treatment such as: Percentage Computation, Median, Chi-Square Test for

Association and Spearman Rho Correlation. Using the descriptive correlational

studies method, the researchers conducted an intervention that was composed of

13 Senior High School and 47 College with a total of 60 working students.

At the end of the study the findings showed that most of the Senior High

School and College Working Students, the overall level of academic performance

in terms of Learning Under Class Participation, Task Performance and

Comprehension rated it as High Level, the overall level of academic performance

in terms of motivation rated it as Very High Level while the overall level of academic

performance in terms of student behavior rated it as High Level.

The result also reveals that there is no significant relationship between the

academic performance when grouped according to age, gender, year/grade level,

and monthly family income. Lastly, there is significant relationship between the

academic performance when grouped according to general weighted average.

v
The recommendations presented in the study were constructed by using

the collected information.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page
Approval Sheet i

vi
Acknowledgement ii-iii
Dedication iv
Abstract v-vi
Table of Contents vii-x
List of Tables ix
List of Figures x
CHAPTER I THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTINGS
Introduction 1-2
Background of the Study 2-3
Theoretical Framework 3-8
Conceptual Framework 9-10
Related Literature 10-24
Statement of the Problem 24-25
Research Hypothesis 25
Scope and Limitations of Study 26
Significance of the Study 26-27
Definition of Terms 27-29

CHAPTER II RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 30


Research Design 30
Respondents of the Study, Sample Size & Sampling Technique 31
Research Instrument 32
Reliability 33
Validity 33
Research Procedures 33
Statistical Treatment of Data 34-36

CHAPTER III PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND 37


INTERPRETATION OF THE DATA
Demographic Profile of Respondents 37-41

vii
Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School and 41-50
College
Working Students
Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the 50-57
Respondents

Chapter IV Summary of Findings, Conclusions and


Recommendation
Summary of Findings 58-62
Conclusion 62-63
Recommendations 64

REFERENCES 65-74

APPENDICES
Appendix A Letter of Request (SHS & College List of Working 77
Student Enrollees)
Appendix B Survey Questionnaire 78-83
Appendix C Letter of Request (Conduct of Online Survey) 85
Appendix D Letter to the Respondents 87
Appendix E Letter for Statistician Request 89
Appendix F Statistician’s Certification 91
Appendix G Language Editor’s Certification 93
Appendix H SPSS Outputs 94-104

Curriculum Vitae 105-115

LIST OF TABLES

viii
Table Title Page
1 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Age 37
2 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Gender 38
3 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of 38
Year/Grade Level
4 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of General 39
Weighted Average (GWA)
5 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Monthly 41
Family Income
6 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School 42
and College Working Students in terms of Learning Under
Class Participation
7 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School 43
and College Working Students in terms of Learning Under Task
Performance
8 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School 44
and College Working Students in terms of Learning Under
Comprehension
9 The Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High 46
School and College Working Students in terms of Learning
10 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School 47
and College Working Students in terms of Motivation
11 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School 48
and College Working Students in terms of Student Behavior
12 The Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High 49
School and College Working Students
13 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the 50
Respondents When Grouped According to their Age
13.1 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the 51
Respondents When Grouped According to their Gender
13.2 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the 53
Respondents When Grouped According to their Year/Grade
Level
13.3 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the 54
Respondents When Grouped According to their General
Weighted Average (GWA)
13.4 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the 56
Respondents When Grouped According to their Monthly Family
Income

ix
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Title Page
1 Theoretical Framework 8
2 Conceptual Framework of the Study 9
3 Distribution of the Respondents 31

x
CHAPTER I

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SETTING

Introduction

Education is the most powerful weapon you can use to change the world,

(Mandela N., n.d.). It also allows us to better understand the world in which we live.

Parents would often say that education is the only thing that they can offer that no

one could steal for their children. Filipinos believed that better education will land

jobs that could potentially change the direction of their career and status in life. But

in order to achieve this, financing the education is a challenge to many. The rising

education fee is usually the burden that many struggle with. Including the

increasing prices of primary needs such as food, utility bills, transportation etc.,

families tend to face difficulties in managing their budget as they have limited family

income. Furthermore, they also had to mind other schooling expenses like projects

and activities that need monetary support. There are also families that can’t send

their child to Kto12 or college because of poverty. As a result, working while

studying becomes an option for students. (Lorenciana, C.,2014)

Being a working student is a responsibility of many less fortunate but

willing young adults and adult individuals. The reason is economics- scarcity of

funds, scarcity of financial resources. Working and studying at the same time can

augment the income or the resources for matriculation or other needs (Velasco,

2014).

1
These students commonly encounter many problems about their work and

their studies. According to Baum (2010), some of these students are awarded

“work” as part of their financial package; other students either do not receive work-

study funding or find such awards insufficient to cover the cost of attendance. This

creates high level of stress and anxiety making them vulnerable to sickness and

failure in pursuing their college degrees (Kasworm, 2010). Working while studying

has its positive and negative sides. When students have a job they will earn money,

some of these students need the money to pay for expensive schools, while other

students need it to make their life easier.

College working students can be more likely be left behind in their

academic environment. They could also feel “out of place” and have less time for

their social life since they are not always around in the campus. Balancing school

work and a social life while coupled with the newly found freedom of living away

from home is often a formidable challenge. Add a part-time job to that mix, and the

burden can become overwhelming, affecting all aspects of a student’s life and his

physical and mental well-being.

The purpose of this research is to look into the status of the academic

performance of senior high school and college working students.

2
Background of the Study

Working student is a student who is permitted to work while studying for

them to pay their own expenses. They are those individuals who find ways to

support themselves, to help their parents to cope with the constant rise of tuition

fees, and a way to fulfill their needs while studying. Having a job while studying is

very hard but it is a big help for a student specially those who has a parent that

cannot support them financially because of the most famous problem of

our country which is poverty. (Furr and Elling, 2000) says that there are many

reasons why students take a part-time job. Financial problems become mostly

reasons of some students forced to take part time job.

Being a working student has a lot of responsibilities. They face a lot of

struggles that sometimes makes them think about giving up, so it clearly

requires a lot of effort and investing so much of their mental and

physical energy that can swiftly make them fatigue, stressed or both.

Concerning academic outcome, (Becker, 1965) points out negative effect on the

academic performance of student who jointly work and study since working

might affect the time dedicated to academic learning and activities. There's a

negative impact of employment activities during universities on academic

performance due to the trade-off between the time dedicated to study

and working.

(Triventi, Darolia, and Body, 2014) have focused on the relevance of work

intensity on academic performance, showing that a negative impact is found when

3
students are employed on full-time jobs, while past-time jobs do not seem to have

significant impact on academic performance.

Mostly, those working students are the one who easily find work after

graduating because they already have experience. They are already productive,

well-trained workers and they are what companies are looking for nowadays.

(Spence, 1973) stated that students work experience can be seems as a strong

signal of work motivation due to the effort and combining work and study.

Internationally, working students varies different eras. They can have lack

of sleep or the feeling of exhaustion every day. It really depends on how they

manage time. Some working students work every day, every hour, and came home

at night. Some students work after school day. The way a person manages

time differs the different struggles. (Jewell, 2014)

In the Philippines, the number of working students is high and according to

Polytechnic University research paper one of the negative effect typically arise

because hours spent at work take away from studying which may lead to lower

grades and less attractive post college opportunities.(Dunca,2019)

In locality, working students are very common nowadays and they say that

time management is their number one problem. The kind of responsibility a

working student have is not easy but it is a big help for them to be productive and

professional someday.

This research has enlighten and made people aware about the working

students and how to deal with them while pursuing their studies and to assess

4
such effects that had greatly influences the Senior High School and College

students in Red Link Institute of Science And Technology.

Theoretical Framework

The study was based on the Theory of Motivation, Learning and Personality

Traits on Academic Performance (MLP) by Salim Nauzeer and Vishal Chandr

Jaunky.

Motivation Constructs

Motivation is defined as the process that initiates, guides, and maintains

goal-oriented behaviors (Cherry, 2016). The inherent interaction between

education psychology (motivation and learning) and personality (traits) psychology

allows for an integrative approach to explain the factors affecting academic

performance. The MLP model applies five constructs for each dimension. The five

constructs reflecting motivation (Ryan & Deci, 2000; Weiner, 1990) are intrinsic,

extrinsic, self-efficacy, achievement and a motivation (IESAA). These constructs

are discussed as follows: Intrinsic motivation is defined as motivation in which the

source is the “inherent satisfaction” an individual derives from the behaviour (Deci

& Ryan, 2008). Extrinsic motivation relates to a wide variety of behaviours from

external sources and these behaviours are engaged in as a means to an end and

not for their own sake (Deci, 1975). Along with Bandura (1995), self-efficacy is

defined as a personal judgement or expectation of how well an individual can

execute courses of action required to deal with prospective situations.

5
Achievement motivation refers to the affinity to work hard to meet personal aims

within a social environment (Cassidy & Lynn, 1989).

Learning Constructs

Learning is identified as “to think using the brain” (Yap, 2012, pp. 442). The

five constructs 1 for learning are cognitive, psychomotor, affective, social and

health (CPASH). They are discussed as follows: Cognitive learning occurs when

knowledge stored in long-term memory is shifted to short-term memory to integrate

new information into the mind (Bell-Gredler, 1986). It explains how mental

processes are influenced by both intrinsic and extrinsic factors, which bring about

learning in an individual. Psychomotor learning posits physical movement,

coordination and use of the motor-skill areas. Those skill developments involve

practice and are measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or

techniques in execution (Dalkir, 2011; Bialik et al., 2015). Affective learning

describes learning objectives that emphasize a feeling tone, an emotion or a

degree of acceptance or rejection (Krathwohl et al., 1964). Social learning theory

stipulates new learning behaviours and abilities by observing others (Bandura,

1977). Health connects to school readiness long before a child begins formal

education. Lindström and Eriksson (2011) conceptualize healthy learning as a

lifelong process where people improve their mental health, wellbeing, and quality

of life through the creation of learning environments characterized by a strong

sense of coherence and healthy behaviour regarding exercise, food habits and

stress-resistance.

6
Personality Constructs

Personality is defined as innate tendencies from biological and

environmental features channelled by a set of habitual behaviours, cognitions and

emotional patterns (Corr & Matthews, 2009). The Big-Five personality trait model

(Goldberg, 1990) constitutes of openness, conscientiousness, extraversion,

agreeableness and neuroticism (OCEAN). Openness trait relates to active

imagination, aesthetic sensitivity, alertness, intellectual curiosity and

independence of judgement. Open individual is curious and unconventional.

Conscientiousness refers to the level of responsibility, planning, organizing and

task-orientation. Conscientious people may be tidy, fastidious and workaholic.

Extraversion includes traits such as sociability, assertiveness, sensation-seeking

and talkativeness. Extraverts are energetic, friendly and optimistic. Agreeableness

involves with empathy, affectionate and optimistic. Agreeable individuals behave

in a socially acceptable manner and follow social norms. Neuroticism is defined by

characteristics such as stress and anxiety. Neurotic people experience negative

emotions such as fear, sadness and anger.

The cited theory is relevant to the present study since it aimed to determine

the status of the academic performance of Senior High School and College

working students.

7
Motivation

Student Academic
Learning
Behavior Performance

Personality

Figure 1. Theoretical Framework

8
Conceptual Framework

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

1. What is the
demographic profile • Determine the
terms of the status of the
following: academic
1.1 Age performance
1.2 Gender of Senior
1.3 Year/ Grade High School
Level and College
1.4 General working
Weighted Average students
(GWA)
1.5 Monthly
Family Income
• Survey • Identify
Question whether there
2. What is the level of naires is a significant
Academic relationship
Performance of the between the
Senior High School • Data academic
and College Working Evaluati performance
Students in terms of: on in terms of
A. Learning
2.1 Class • Data learning,
motivation
Participation Analysis
and student
2.2 Task and
Performance
behavior the
Interpret demographic
2.3
Comprehension ation profile of SHS
B. Motivation and College
C. Student Behavior working
students
3. Is there a significant
relationship between • Conclusion
the academic for the subject
performance of the matter of this
respondents and the
study.
profile of the
students?

FEEDBACK

Figure 2 Conceptual Framework of the Study

9
The research paradigm illustrates the conceptual framework of the study

that shows the relationship of the input, process and output of the topic. This

framework embodies the specific direction by which the research will have to be

undertaken by describing the relationship between specific variables identified in

the study.

The input consists of the research method applied in conducting the

research regarding the demographic and level of academic performance of the

Senior High School and College working students.

The process shows the different approach that was used to convert the data

gathered into useful information which will then be used to produce the desired

output. The processes will include the giving of interview questions and survey

questionnaires to the respondents, the interpretation of the data gathered, and the

analysis and evaluation of those data.

The output box shows the desired outcome of the research which is to

determine the status of the academic performance of Senior High School and

College working students.

Related Literature

Foreign Literature

"Demmert, William., Jr (2006). This literature review examines research-

based information on educational approaches and programs associated with

improving the academic performance of Native American Students. A search

reviewed ERIC’s over 8,000 documents on American Indian education, as well as

10
master’s and doctoral dissertations and other sources of research on the education

of Native Americans. Selected research reports and articles were organized into

the following categories: early childhood environment and experiences; Native

language and cultural programs, teachers, instruction, and curriculum, community

and parental influences on academic performance; student characteristics;

economic and social factors; and factors leading to success in college or college

completion. The status of research and major research findings are reviewed for

each of these categories; brief summaries of research findings with citations are

included following the review of each category. Also included are an annotated

bibliography of more than 100 research reports, journal articles, and dissertations,

most published after 1985; and a bibliography of 23 additional references to other

literature reviews and non-Native studies. (SV)

As stressed by Gilani (2012) in the works of Garcia and Pearson, reading

strategies are deliberate actions that learners select to establish and improve their

reading comprehension. He stressed that these strategies are the mental

processes involved in the reading techniques chosen by the students while

reading. Usually, these techniques are selected consciously to facilitate reading

comprehension.

Locally, based on the results of National Assessment of Educational

Progress (NAEP) exams, progress in reading comprehension is lagging behind the

improvement in mathematics over the past two decades. Part of the difficulty is

that the strategies have been drawn by assuming that we actually know what good

11
readers do and that reading comprehension can be dissected into various parts,

each one necessitating a particular strategy. Reading comprehension is really

complex.

In addition, to Horowitz (2012), the reader must also be intentional and

thoughtful while reading, monitoring the words and their meaning as reading

progresses. And the reader must apply reading comprehension strategies as ways

to be sure that what is being read matches their expectations and builds on their

growing body of knowledge that is being stored for immediate or future reference.

The aforementioned prevailing situations have inspired the researchers

believing that there is a need to conduct the current study of Reading Strategies

among the 2nd year Bachelor in Elementary Education students in University of

Southeastern Philippines.

Krishnan (2005) conducted a study on non-intellectual factors and their

influence on academic achievement. The sample comprised of 180 students of

sixth to ninth class studying in central school Tirupati and was divided into three

groups depending on their parents’ education as high, middle and low. The results

indicated that parent’s educational status had significant influence on the academic

achievement of their children.

Aggarwal (2006) conducted a study on reading ability in relation to some

cognitive and non-cognitive factors. The sample constituted 200 male and female

students selected randomly from the high schools of Bihar in India. Data were

collected by administering reading ability test to the sample. The results of the

12
study indicated that female students had better read ability and higher academic

achievement than male students.

Poropat, Arthur (2009) reports a meta-analysis of personality-academic

performance relationships. based on the 5-factor model, in which cumulative

sample sizes ranged to over 70,000. Most analyzed studies came from the tertiary

level of education, but there were similar aggregate samples from secondary and

tertiary education. There was a comparatively smaller sample derived from studies

at the primary level. Academic performance was found to correlate significantly

with Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness.

Robbins (2004) conducted a meta-analysis on the role that psychosocial

factors play as determinants of college performance and persistence. They found

that performance based and goal-based motivation constructs were predictive of

both academic performance and persistence. They also found that social

connectedness constructs were predictive of persistence after controlling for

academic preparation.

Mallillin (2021) Behavior and attitude of students in the new normal

perspectives have an impact in their learning process. It contributes to self-

determination in the new normal classes and framework theory of learning

engagement and supports the influence of the new normal classes and learning

perspective development.

Where tested, correlations between Conscientiousness and academic

performance were largely independent of intelligence. When secondary academic

performance was controlled for, Conscientiousness added as much to the

13
prediction of tertiary academic performance as did intelligence. Strong evidence

was found for moderators of correlations. Academic level (primary, secondary, or

tertiary), average age of participant, and the interaction between academic level

and age significantly moderated correlations with academic performance. Possible

explanations for these moderator effects are discussed, and recommendations for

future research are provided.

Hill and Tyson (2009) Early adolescence is often marked by changes in

school context, family relationships, and developmental processes. In the context

of these changes, academic performance often declines, while at the same time

the long-term implications of academic performance increase. In promoting

achievement across elementary and secondary school levels, the significant role

of families, family-school relations, and parental involvement in education has

been highlighted. Although there is a growing body of literature focusing on

parental involvement in education during middle school, this research has not been

systematically examined to determine which types of involvement have the

strongest relation with achievement. The authors conducted a meta-analysis on

the existing research on parental involvement in middle school to determine

whether and which types of parental involvement are related to achievement.

Across 50 studies, parental involvement was positively associated with

achievement, with the exception of parental help with homework. Involvement that

reflected academic socialization had the strongest positive association with

achievement. Based on the known characteristics of the developmental stage and

14
tasks of adolescence, strategies reflecting academic socialization are most

consistent with the developmental stage of early adolescence.

Local Literature

De Guzman, De Castro (2011) graduates need to develop personal skills,

qualities and experiences that enable to them to compete in the labor market. The

author advises the need for students to do everything they can for them to grow

as experts in their chosen field while they are still in school. All these trainings and

experiences will just benefit them where the time comes that will be establishing

their own careers. This is related the present study as it gave suggestions to further

improve the AB Journalism curriculum which must live up to demands and

expectations of the different industries. The Philippines may go beyond the

standing of employment in the country, rights and importance should be

understood. As specified in the book labor Economics by Cristobal M. Pagoso, in

view of low literacy rates in rising unemployment in developing countries, it has

become imperative that greater educational opportunities should be provided for

the great proportion of adult population as well as the large number of youths

outside the formal school system to help them acquire further knowledge and skill

thereby improving their livelihood and strengthening the country. From the book

Contemporary Social Problems and Issues, it states that the educational levels

and literacy rates of workers in the Philippines are among the highest in Asia, but

technical, manual and managerial are poorly developed and in short supply. There

is an over-abundance of college graduates that most especially in Manila area

15
were in the field of education, law and other professionals exceed in demand to

find employment appropriate to their educational training. This information may be

considered in the improvement of AB Journalism curriculum to add the technical;

manual and managerial skills which are said to be lacking among the Filipino

graduates.

Angelo Dulas (2010) Primarily, the study was conducted to determine the

relationship between self-efficacy and academic performances on Math and

English subject of science high school students. The objectives are (a) to find what

level of self-efficacy do High school students have and (b) to explore if there is

gender difference among high school students in terms of their self-efficacy and

academic performance.

Katigbak (2010) In a comparison of Filipino and American college students’

self-reported academic motives, approval and self-improvement ranked higher for

Filipino students and motives involving performance standards ranked higher for

American students. Gender differences - men reported more assertive and

competitive achievement modes, women stronger motives regarding performance

standards - replicated across the two cultures, suggesting generalizable

socialization differences for achievement. intrinsic task motives-enjoyment of

school tasks, persistence, and setting of high-performance standards-were closely

tied to affiliation and self8improvement motives for Filipino but not American

students; achieving and affiliating motives may be less distinct in the Philippine

setting than implied by Western theory.

16
Rivera (2007) stated that the interest and goals have been identified as two

important motivational constructs that influence student’s engagement and

achievement in learning. However, the bulk of research on motivation in physical

educational pedagogy emanates from achievement goal theories. Achievement

goals have been reported to have a weak influence in predicting both performance

and motivation outcomes. Interest, on the other hand, has been found to play a

key role in influencing student learning behavior and intention to participate in the

future.

Foreign Studies

Scott (2006), discovered that reading comprehension is influenced

imperatively by a student’s level of word knowledge. This includes vocabulary and

spelling proficiency and also the skill to decode words in print.

Furthermore, Paynter, Bodrova & Doty (2005), define reading

comprehension as intricate practice that involves many levels of processing. They

additionally noted that one of the most primary aspects of comprehension is the

resistance to deal with unfamiliar words converged in text. Readers who find it

difficult in terms of word-level tasks use up valuable cognitive space intended for

deeper levels of text analysis. It is not sufficient to depend merely on context

indication to predict the meaning of new words, since this strategy frequently

results in inaccuracy or shallow perceptions of key terms, especially in content-

area reading.

17
In addition, reading comprehension is a complex cognitive process that

relies upon a number of ingredients working together at once in a synchronous,

even automatic way.

The reader must be intentional and thoughtful while reading, monitoring the

words and their meaning as reading progress. Readers must adapt reading

comprehension strategies to ascertain that what is being read corresponds to their

knowledge accumulated and stored for a sudden or future reference. Horowitz

(2012).

Conley (2009) This article considers the importance of ownership of

learning as a key component of college readiness. The article is organized around

two conceptual models. The first is a four-part model of college readiness that

includes key cognitive strategies, key content knowledge, key learning skills and

techniques, and key transition knowledge and skills. The second is a five-part

model of ownership of learning that consists of the following elements: motivation

and engagement, goal orientation and self-direction, self-efficacy and self-

confidence, metacognition and self-monitoring, and persistence. Finally, the article

concludes with a discussion of the role and importance of ownership of learning

and makes the case that these elements can and should be taught to all students,

and particularly in settings where an achievement gap exists.

According to study of Chinn (2009), cited that Comprehending or

comprehension strategies are strategies that help students understand and

remember material such as texts and lectures. Most of the research on

comprehension strategies has focused on learning from reading texts. Five

18
strategies that have been found to be useful for enhancing comprehension are

monitoring, using text structure, summarizing, elaborating, and explaining.

Moreover, Phakiti as cited by Ghafournia & Afghari (2013) states that

comprehending strategies are used by language learners to comprehend texts and

extract meaning. Good examples of comprehending strategies are identifying main

ideas, making inferences about the implied meaning, translating, making

prediction, skimming, and scanning reading texts.

In addition, Phakiti (2006) found that retrieval strategies were found to

largely affect comprehending strategies. This means that comprehending

strategies depend largely on the effectiveness of retrieval strategies. Perhaps in

reading comprehension, the extent to which comprehending strategies are

successfully used depends on how well one can retrieve information.

The study of Phakiti and the present study have similarity since both dealt

with students’ strategies in learning in the different subject area.

Darst (2007) sought to examine the effects of task design on situational

interest and the extent to which the effects were mediated by gender, grade,

individual interest, and skill levels. (an important finding that emerged from this

investigation was the role of cognitive demand of learning task in generation

situational interest. It was concluded that providing learners with “a learning task

that demands relatively high cognitive engagement is likely to be perceived as

interesting and enjoyable regardless of the intensity of the physical involvement in

the task demands”. Teaching games for Understanding (TGfU) or the tactical

Approach provides students with a relatively high cognitive demand in solving

19
tactical problems to game play. Situational interest was also found to be a function

of learning task design and it varied across different learning task in physical

education.

The study of Darst and the present study have similarity since both dealt

with students’ interest in learning in the different subject area.

Local Studies

Torres (2005) examined the teaching effectiveness and job satisfaction of

public elementary school teachers in the Division of Northern Samar. Among her

findings are as follows: the status of the teacher’s level effectiveness subject-

matter, motivational teacher behavior and personal and social characteristics.

They were very effective in classroom management as assessed by the teachers

and administration did not differ with regards to the aspects of teaching.

Dela Cruz (2014) many highly educated Filipino today, married or

unmarried, have indicated their desire to be part of national effort to build the nation

and to contribute to the national welfare. Some have shown their need and

capability to make good or even excel in some field of national endeavor, as well

as fulfill their responsibilities.

It would be bare economic necessity. To do so would equate living to taking

out the bare necessities of life and overlook the need for the fullness of living

presented by satisfaction in the family life, pride in one’s work, joy in the culture

and the arts, and pleasure in the comforts that modern day living has to offer. There

are many so-called “hazards” for working student. Among them are neglect

20
studies, inability to fully cope with school duties and the physical strain being a

student about by the added responsibilities of gainful employment to that.

Perry (2010) Academic emotions have largely been neglected by

educational psychology, with the exception of test anxiety. In 5 qualitative studies,

it was found that students experience a rich diversity of emotions in academic

settings. Anxiety was reported most often, but overall, positive emotions were

described no less frequently than negative emotions.

Mercado (2008) conducted research on job-related stressors as correlates

to teaching performance. In their study, all faculty members of the College of

Science who have undergone evaluators of their teaching performance of their

respective students were the subjects of the study.

Based on the result of the study, the researchers concluded that the major

factors affecting the burnout inventory of teachers are: emotional exhaustion

(teachers are tired out at the end of the day); depersonalization (teachers do not

want to stay in the campus after the class) and; reduced Personal Factor (teachers

feel frustrated with their work). Meanwhile, the major factors that affect the job-

related stressors are; physical facilities (the rooms and laboratory cannot

accommodate the students); organizational structure (funds and other benefits for

teachers are not immediately released causing them.

Feden (2006) stated that the important thing is for student to learn skills

necessary for everyday living and which they understand and appreciate. It is not

enough that they memorize and repeat. In effective teaching strategy start with

specific fact or information or prior knowledge has been identified. Then, continue

21
with process until generalization is reached and work an application. On the line

teachers’ part, the decision on how to assist the performance of the pupils will be

the identification of the competency that has to be demonstrated by the students.

The description of the task to be performed by the students and authentication of

task reflects the partnership for improving classroom instruction.

According to Masikip (2012) that the second-year high school students

obtained a poor performance in the pretest and obtained good performance in the

posttest before and after exposure to remediation activities. It was also found out

that performance of the respondents in algebra differ significantly before and after

exposure to remediation activities. Performance of the respondents in algebra after

exposure to remediation activities did not differ significantly in terms of sex and

monthly family income.

Alcovendas and Espares (2013) discusses that AB English honor graduates

are gainfully employed having sufficient annual income, have a tendency of staying

long in the company. The statement of Alcovendas and Espares was relevant

because in the present study conducted by the researchers. The result shows that

academic performances in school really affect the employment status of the

graduates. The honors and awards that some graduates acquire where

instrumental to attaining a better job after graduation.

The study of Alcovendas, Espares and the present study have similarity since both

dealt with academic performance of the students.

Nelita M. Lalican (2008) discussed the relevance of its productivity with the

present condition. The findings of the study revealed that, employers prefer

22
specialists rather than generalists and the employers find the graduates effective,

efficient and cooperative. They also find the graduates knowledgeable,

dependable and resourceful however, many employers describe UPLB graduates

as academically inclined, having a know it-all attitude although with assertive

personality. This also has bearing to the current tracer study among AB Journalism

graduates since this present research also tried to find out whether these

graduates are effective, efficient and cooperative.

The study of Lalican and the present study have similarity since both dealt

with Employment.

Synthesis of the Reviewed Related Literature and Studies

This study focuses on the academic performance of working students at

Red Link Institute of Science and Technology. In Educational Institutions,

academic performance is the student's participation in the evaluation process

through performance assessments, which experts have proven to promote student

engagement and improve learning.

About the Age of the students, there is no age limit for learning; the problem

is that some people believe that their Age may prevent them from learning until

they are adults. Even though successful and well-informed individuals believe that

Age has nothing to do with personality development.

Learning is about acquiring students' readiness for the future and helping

them reach their full potential as lifelong learners. It indicates that they have a view

and the confidence to voice their thoughts and opinions to be heard and

23
considered in any circumstance. However, sometimes working lessens the time

spent learning and academic participation. It is more than just going to classes. It

is also essential for integrating into the culture and community of the institution and

developing relationships.

Motivation is the lead predictor of learning and success. Students who are

more driven to learn better in class and on a standardized test endure longer, and

put up the higher-quality effort. The ability to initiate and maintain behavior toward

a goal is known as motivation. In both casual and formal learning situations, it is

essential to learning and success over the lifespan.

Statement of the Problem

The study sought to determine the relationship of demographic profile to

academic performance in terms of learning, motivation and student behavior of

Senior High School and College working students of Red Link Institute of Science

And Technology.

1. What is the demographic profile in terms of the following:

1.1 Age

1.2 Gender

1.3 Year/ Grade Level

1.4 General Weighted Average (GWA)

1.5 Monthly Family Income

24
2. What is the level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School

and College Working Students in terms of:

A. Learning

2.1 Class Participation

2.2 Task Performance

2.3 Comprehension

B. Motivation

C. Student Behavior

3. Is there a significant relationship between the academic performance of

the respondents and the profile of the students?

Research Hypothesis

Based on the problems presented in this study, the researchers formulated these

hypothesis:

There is no significant relationship between the academic performance

when grouped according to age, gender, year/grade level, and monthly family

income.

There is significant relationship between the academic performance when

grouped according to general weighted average.

25
Scope and Limitation of the Study

For the clarity of focus, this research was to be guided by the specific scope

and limitations. The research focuses into status of the academic performance of

Senior High School and College working students. The researchers limit their study

by giving online questionnaire to the 13 Senior High School and 47 College

working students of Red Link Institute of Science And Technology.

Significance of the Study

The result of this study will provide a basis to the students for awareness

and better understanding of how their current work affects their academic

performance. This study may also help the other students to understand the

situation of Senior High School and College who work and study.

Working Students. This study will motivate them to manage their responsibilities

towards school and work so that their academic performance will not be affected

in favor of their work or vice-versa.

Students. This study will give the regular students an idea on how important

education is. This will motivate them to be more focused on their studies.

Parents. This study will give the parents an idea on the problems working students

have encountered. This will motivate them to become more supportive and more

understanding towards their children.

26
Professors. To better understand the situation of working students enrolled in their

class, in providing them with alternative tasks and academic measures that will not

sacrifice effectiveness of teaching methods and the quality of learning, whenever

conflicts between work and studies arise.

School. School will benefit from the results of the study by knowing the status of

the academic performance of senior high school and college working students.

Researchers. This will deepen the researchers’ knowledge of the lives and

struggles of the working students in their quest for success.

Future Researchers. May be able to use the findings of the study for further

research and investigation particularly related to the academic performance of

working students since there are very limited local studies that can be found

exploring this particular subject or concern.

Definition Terms

The following terms are operationally defined to make them more

understandable to the readers of this study:

Academic Performance - is the basic criterion used to assess students’ success

in their studies, making it vital to understand the factors responsible for

determining, predicting, mediating and causing variance in academic achievement

27
Working Student - is a student who is permitted to work while studying for them

to pay their own expenses. They are those individuals who find ways to support

themselves, to help their parents to cope with the constant rise of tuition fees, and

a way to fulfill their needs while studying.

Studying - is the act of learning and spending time discovering information or an

academic work or investigation about a particular thing or subject area. (Wikipedia)

Class- A group of students attending a specific course or lesson

Problems Encountered - The hindrance and obstacles the working students met

that would affect their academic performance.

Demographic profile - refers to data about the features or characteristics that

define an individual or population. (Wikipedia)

Employment – is a relationship between two parties, usually based on

a contract where work is paid for, where one is the employer and the other is

the employee.

General Weighted Average (GWA) - is used to evaluate students' overall

scholastic standing.

28
Comprehension - The ability to understand completely and be familiar with a

situation(Wikipedia)

CHAPTER II

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter provides information on the methods used in this study. The

researcher used the six basic components of research which are as follows:

research design, respondents of the study, sampling technique, research

instrument, research procedure and statistical treatment of data.

29
Research Design

The researcher utilized the descriptive method of research through

identifying and analyzing to know the status of the academic performance of

senior high school and college working students. This method involves the

collection of data answered the questions stated on the statement of the problem.

Questionnaire as the main tool in gathering data was also used.

Descriptive correlational design is used in research studies that aim to

provide static pictures of situations as well as establish the relationship between

different variables (McBurney & White, 2009). It was used to established the

predictive relationship. Descriptive correlational design uses two or more set of

data to examine the existence and strength relationship between them. This

method was used to guide the researcher in looking for answers to each specific

formulated using normative survey questionnaire to gather the needed data.

Respondents of the Study, Sample Size, and Sampling Technique

The people who make up the population for this research study was working

Senior High School and College Students for the Academic Year 2022 – 2023 of

Red Link Institute of Science and Technology.

Senior High School


Grade / Strand Number of Working
Student
Grade 11 Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) 5
Grade 11 Information and Communication Technology 2
Grade 11 Industrial Arts 1

30
Grade 11 Science, Technology, Engineering, and 1
Mathematics
Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences 3
Grade 12 Industrial Arts 1
Subtotal 13
College
Year / Course Number of Working
Student
First Year - Bachelor in Technical -Vocational Teacher 13
Education
First Year - Bachelor of Science in Accountancy (BSA) 1
First Year - Bachelor of Science in Accounting Information 1
System (BSAIS)
Second Year - Bachelor in Technical -Vocational Teacher 2
Education (BTVTEd)
Second Year - Bachelor of Science in Accounting 2
Information System (BSAIS)
Third Year - Bachelor in Technical -Vocational Teacher 3
Education (BTVTEd)
Third Year - Bachelor of Science in Accountancy 9
Fourth Year - Bachelor in Technical -Vocational Teacher 6
Education (BTVTEd)
Fourth Year - Bachelor of Science in Accountancy 10
Subtotal 47
TOTAL 60
Figure 3. Distribution of the Respondents

As stated by in this study, selecting the respondents in each stratum, the

convenience method of non-random sampling should be utilized. The selection

of samples from the population must be based on easy availability and

accessibility of getting responses of the respondents the researcher used. The

sample size was determined using the Slovin’s Formula. It is a sampling

technique used in determining sample size and a certain margin of error from the

given population size.

Formula:
n=N
1 + Ne2

31
Where:

n= number of samples

N= total population

e= margin of error

Research Instrument

A survey questionnaire was electronically formulated by the researchers

was used as the primary research instrument for this research study. The

questionnaire was given and communicated to the respondents digitally through

the use of email messaging and Google forms. The survey questionnaire will serve

as the data gathering method it was used by the researchers to gather information

and data from the respondents.

Reliability

The researchers seek opinion and asked approval of the survey

questionnaire to those people who are masters in this field, adviser, panel, school

administrator, registrar, and statistician.

Validity

32
The researchers conducted a pre-test after seek opinion and approval from

other experts. Pre-test was conducted in Red Link Institute of Science And

Technology.

Research Procedure

To gather the necessary data for this research study, a letter of request was

submitted to the School Registrar and Vice President of Academic Affairs in Red

Link Institute of Science And Technology to acquire the respondents’ personal

information. The respondents initially contacted by the researchers to ask for

their permission in participating with the research study. Subsequent to asking

permission, the survey questionnaire was sent out to the respondents through

the use of email messaging and Google forms.

The data was gathered from this study then be computed, tabulated,

analyzed and interpreted by the researchers.

Statistical Treatment of Data

The data was gathered by the researchers from conducting the

data gathering procedures with the used of their research instruments was

statistically treated with the following methods.

1. Percentage
The frequency and percent distributions will use in presenting the profile of

the respondents. The researchers utilize the formula:

33
Formula:

P = F X 100
N
𝑛

Where:
x 100
P = Percentage of Respondents (%)

F = Frequency of Respondents

n = Total number of Respondents

100 = Constant number

2. Median was used to determine the assessment of respondents on the

procedures as to application, evaluation, selection and collection and to

determine the status of the academic performance of senior high school and

college working students. It was used considering that through median,

researchers determine what the average respondent’s answer, or in other words,

the likeliest response. The median, also, is less affected by outliers and skewed

data.

Where:

l= Lower limit of median class

N= Total frequency

f0= Frequency of class preceding the median class

34
f1= Frequency of median class

h= Width of median class

The Likert’s Five Point Grading Scale is utilized by the researcher in

tabulating the evaluation data we gathered through the questionnaire.

A Likert scale is a psychometric scale commonly involved in research that

employs questionnaires. It is the most widely used approach to scaling

responses in survey research, such that the term is often used interchangeably

with rating scale, although there are other types of rating scales.

Rate Verbal Range


5 Strongly Agree 4.6 – 5.0
4 Agree 3.6 – 4.5
3 Uncertain 2.6 – 3.5
2 Disagree 1.6 – 2.5
1 Strongly Disagree 1.0 – 1-5

3. Chi-Square Test for Association also called Pearson’s chi-square test this was

used to discover if there is a relationship between two categorical variables.

35
4. Spearman Rho Correlation a nonparametric measure of the strength and

direction of association that exists between two variables measured on at least

an ordinal scale. This was used in study to determine the significant difference

on the assessments of the theory in working while working on their academic

performances in Red Link Institute of Science And Technology.

Where:

p = Spearman's rank correlation coefficient

di = difference between the two ranks of each observation

n = number of observations

CHAPTER III

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

This chapter presents result of the survey, analysis and interpretations on

the gathered data about the profile of the respondents of Senior High and College

working Students in Red Link Institute of Science And Technology.

36
1.1 Age
Table 1 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Age
Age Frequency Percentage Rank
1. 18 to 20 years old 22 36.7 2
2. 21 to 30 years old 32 53.3 1
3. 31 to 40 years old 6 10.0 3
Total 60 100.0

Table 1 represent the frequency and percentage distribution in the age of

respondents 53.3 % of the respondents age 21 to 30 years old, 36.7 % of the

respondents age is 18 to 20 years old and 10 % of the respondents age 31 to 40

years old.

The table implies that there’s no age limit for learning. According to

(Evopry.com) the thing is that most people believe that age may force or restrict

them to learn in adulthood. Although successful and well-minded people believe

that personality development is only about activism, not age.

Many believe that age can constrain learning ability, and some believe that

age is the main criterion for learning. It is a myth that age can limit our ability to

learn new things, diversify our skills, and expand our horizons. If you go with

specialization, you will continue your learning process till the last day of your life.

1.2 Gender
Table 2 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of
Gender
Gender Frequency Percentage Rank
1. Male 29 48.3 2
2. Female 31 51.7 1
Total 60 100.0

37
Table 2 represent the frequency and percentage distribution on the gender

of the respondents 51.7 % are female and 48.3 % are male.

This analysis implies that the majority of the respondents were female. This

is due to the fact that there are more female enrolled in this school year than male.

According to Carnevale et al., 2015, regardless of race, female students are more

likely to work while studying compared to their counterparts.

1.3 Year/ Grade Level


Table 3 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Year/
Grade Level
Year/ Grade Level Frequency Percentage Rank
1. 1st Year College 15 25.0 2
2. 2nd Year College 4 6.7 5.5
3. 3rd Year College 12 20.0 3
4. 4th Year College 16 26.7 1
5. Grade 11 Senior High 9 15.0
4
School
6. Grade 12 Senior High 4 6.7
5.5
School
Total 60 100.0

Table 3 represent the frequency and percentage distribution in the

Year/Grade Level of college respondents 26.7 % of the respondents Year/Grade

Level is 4th Year College, 25.0% of the respondents Year/Grade Level is 1st Year

College, 20.0 % of the respondents Year/Grade Level is 3rd Year College, 15.0 %

of the respondents Year/Grade Level is Grade 11 Senior High School, 6.7 % of the

respondents Year/Grade Level is 2nd Year College and 6.7 % of the respondents

Year/Grade Level is Grade 12 Senior High School.

This analysis implies that the majority of respondents are College working

students followed by Senior High School. Based on the study of Rajeev Darolia

38
(2014), there are a growing number of students in college that are working and to

a greater extent.

1.4 General Weighted Average (GWA)


Table 4 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of General
Weighted Average (GWA)
General Weighted Average Frequency Percentage Rank
(GWA)
1. 1.25 (95-97%) 4 6.7 6
2. 1.50 (92-94%) 7 11.7 3
3. 1.75 (89-91%) 15 25.0 2
4. 2.00 (86-88%) 17 28.3 1
5. 2.25 (83-85%) 1 1.7 9
6. 3.00 (75%) 3 5.0 7
7. Outstanding (90-100%) 1 1.7 9
8. Very Satisfactory (85- 5 8.3
5
89%)
9. Satisfactory (80-84%) 6 10.0 4
10. Fairly Satisfactory (75- 1 1.7
9
79%)
Total 60 100.0

Table 4 represent the frequency and percentage distribution in the General

Weighted Average (GWA) of respondents both SHS and College Working

Students, 28.3 % (College Students) of the respondents General Weighted

Average (GWA) is 2.00 (86-88%), followed by 25.0% of the respondents (College

Students) General Weighted Average (GWA) is 1.75 (89-91%), followed by 11.7

% of the respondents (College Students) General Weighted Average (GWA) is

1.50 (92-94%), followed by 10.0% of the respondents (SHS Students) General

Weighted Average (GWA) is Satisfactory (80-84%), followed by 8.3 % of the

respondents (SHS Students) General Weighted Average (GWA) is Very

Satisfactory (85-89%), followed by 6.7% of the respondents (College Students)

39
General Weighted Average (GWA) is 1.25 (95-97%), followed by 5.0 % of the

respondents (College Students) General Weighted Average (GWA) is 3.00 (75%),

followed by 1.7 % of the respondents (College Students) General Weighted

Average (GWA) is 2.25 (83-85%), followed by 1.7 % of the respondents (SHS

Students) General Weighted Average (GWA) is Outstanding (90-100%), and 1.7%

of the respondents (SHS Students) General Weighted Average (GWA) is Fairly

Satisfactory (75-79%).

This analysis implies that the majority of the College respondents got

General Weighted Average (GWA) of 2.00 (86-88%) and SHS respondents got

Satisfactory (80-84%). According to Curtis & Shani, 2002, students might desire to

achieve higher grades and attend lectures often, but it is not possible due to their

working schedule. For that reason, universities should be flexible in

accommodating such working students (Curtis, 2007) so they can acquire both

academic success and enhance employability (Watts & Pickering, 2000).

1.5 Monthly Family Income


Table 5 The Demographic Profile of the Respondents in terms of Monthly
Family Income
Monthly Family Income Frequency Percentage Rank
1. Less than Php20,000 44 73.3 1
2. Php20,000 to 13 21.7
2
Php29,999
3. Php30,000 to 1 1.7
4
Php39,000
4. Php40,000 and above 2 3.3 3
Total 60 100.0

40
Table 5 shows that most of the respondent has a Monthly Family Income of

less than Php 20,000. There is a percentage of 73.3%, followed by Php 20,000 to

Php 29,999 with percentage of 21.7%, then followed by Php 40,000 and above

with 3.3% and Php 30,000 to Php 39,000 with 1.7%.

This analysis implies that the majority of the respondents has a Monthly

Family Income of less than Php 20,000. According to Mathuews, 2018, one of the

primary reasons’ students work while studying is to help pay for their college fees.

On the other hand, financial aids do not sufficiently cover all college expenses.

Institutional tuition discounts normally cover about 12-20 percent of college tuition

and fees. With the increasing tuition fees, some students even cannot afford to pay

with their saving money from their previous employment (Carnavale et al., 2015).

Even though the college expenses are high, some students are still pursuing their

degree to improve their standard of living through education (Pusser, 2010).

2. What is the level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School

and College Working Students in terms of:

A. Learning
2.1 Class Participation
Table 6. The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School and
College Working Students in terms of Learning under Class Participation
Verbal
Statement Median
Interpretation
Enhance my study habits 4 High Level
Share thoughts or ideas during the lesson. 4 High Level
Capture my eagerness and enthusiasm for the
4 High Level
lesson.
Take an active role in class. 4 High Level
Create my own study habits 4 High Level

41
Overall Level of Academic Performance of
the Senior High School and College Working
Students in terms of Learning Under Class 4 High Level
Participation

Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –


Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

Table 6 represented in terms of Learning, under the Class Participation, a

median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for the enhance the study

habit, followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for

share thoughts or ideas during lessons, followed by median of 4% with a verbal

interpretation as “High Level” for capture eagerness and enthusiasm for the lesson,

followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for take an

active role in class, and finally with median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as

“High Level” that students create their own study habits.

The findings indicate that the class participation of the SHS and College

working students is influenced by their job. This implies that having a job is not a

hindrance for the students to participate inside the classroom and to perform well

in their class. This supports the statements of Eastwold (2004) indicates that some

researchers believe that truancy problems can be blamed on ineffective school

attendance policies. In some cases the costs in time and energy to enforce

compulsory education statutes seem to outweigh the benefits. As a result schools

will develop policies that devote the most energy to those students expected to

have the best chance of success.

42
2.2 Task Performance

Table 7 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School and
College Working Students in terms of Learning under Task Performance
Verbal
Statement Median
Interpretation
1. Willing to participate actively in the
4 High Level
discussion.
2. Adapt to daily learning activities. 4 High Level
3. Boost my involvement in group activities. 4 High Level
4. Can provide variety of activities to
4 High Level
increase my participation in class.
5. Improve my willingness to take part in
4 High Level
group discussions.
Overall Level of Academic Performance of
the Senior High School and College Working
4 High Level
Students in terms of Learning Under Task
Performance
Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –
Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

Table 7 represented under Task Performance, a median of 4% with a verbal

interpretation as “High Level” for the student willing to participate actively in

discussion, followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level”

for the students adapt to daily learning activities, followed by median of 4% with a

verbal interpretation as “High Level” for the student boost involvement in group

activities, followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for

the student can provide variety of activities to increase my participation in class

and finally with median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for the

student to improve willingness to take part in group discussions.

The findings reveal that having a job has a positive effects on their task

performance. This implies that the students develop their skills in attaining to

actively participate in a certain task. This supports the study of Krishnan (2005)

43
conducted a study on non-intellectual factors and their influence on academic

achievement. The sample comprised of 180 students of sixth to ninth class

studying in central school Tirupati and was divided into three groups depending on

their parents‟ education as high, middle and low. The results indicated that

parents‟ educational status had significant influence on the academic achievement

of their children.

2.3 Comprehension

Table 8 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School and
College Working Students in terms of Learning under Comprehension
Verbal
Statement Median
Interpretation
1. My teacher explains the concept of lesson
4 High Level
very clear.
2. I do understand the lesson by completely
4 High Level
analyzing the subject matter.
3. I am equip in English language to
4 High Level
understand the lesson.
4. My ability to understand the subject matter
4 High Level
is easy for me.
5. My comprehension still needs to improve. 4 High Level
Overall Level of Academic Performance of
the Senior High School and College Working
4 High Level
Students in terms of Learning Under
Comprehension
Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –
Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

Table 8 represented, under Comprehension, a median of 4% with a verbal

interpretation as “High Level” that the teacher explains the concept of lesson very

clear, followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for the

student do understand the lesson by completely analyzing the subject matter,

44
followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for student

equip in English language to understand the lesson, followed by median of 4% with

a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for the student ability to understand the

subject matter is easy and finally with median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as

“High Level” for the student comprehension still needs to improve.

The data connote that the students believe that their comprehension ability

were improved and enhanced by taking a job. This pertains that the students were

able to develop their ability in comprehension in the teaching- learning process.

This supports the study of Angelo Dulas (2010) that the strategies to

determine the relationship between self-efficacy and academic performances on

Math and English subject of science high school students. The objectives are (a)

to find what level of self-efficacy do High school students have and (b) to explore

if there is gender difference among high school students in terms of their self-

efficacy and academic performance.

Table 9 The Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High


School and College Working Students in terms of Learning
Verbal
Variable Median
Interpretation
1.Class Participation 4 High Level
2.Task Performance 4 High Level
3.Comprehension 4 High Level
The Overall The Level of Academic
Performance of the Senior High School and
4 High Level
College Working Students in terms of
Learning
Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –
Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

45
Table 9 represented the overall the level of academic performance of the

senior high school and college working students in terms of learning. A median of

4 % with a verbal interpretation of High Level.

It could be deduced from the results that the respondents believe that their

level of performance are affected by their job. Findings imply that having jobs is

not a barrier to perform well and improve their other skills that is related in school

matters. The findings are in relation to the study of Rivera (2007) that the interest

and goals have been identified as two important motivational constructs that

influence student’s engagement and achievement in learning. However, the bulk

of research on motivation in physical educational pedagogy emanates from

achievement goal theories. Achievement goals have been reported to have a weak

influence in predicting both performance and motivation outcomes. Interest, on the

other hand, has been found to play a key role in influencing student learning

behavior and intention to participate in the future.

B. Motivation
Table 10 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School
and College Working Students in terms of Motivation
Verbal
Statement Median
Interpretation
1. My family encourage me to pursue study 5 Very High Level
2. For my family to have better life. 5 Very High Level
3. Working is an additional learning for my
5 Very High Level
future journey.
4. I trust God that he is with me while I am
5 Very High Level
doing both.
5. Good financial status is one of my goals. 5 Very High Level

46
Overall Level of Academic Performance of
the Senior High School and College Working 5 Very High Level
Students in terms of Motivation
Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –
Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

In terms of Motivation, a median of 5% with a verbal interpretation as “Very

High Level” for the student family encourage to pursue study, followed by median

of 5% with a verbal interpretation as “Very High Level” for the student family to

have a better life, followed by median of 5% with a verbal interpretation as “Very

High Level” that working is an additional learning for my future journey, followed

by median of 5% with a verbal interpretation as “Very High Level” for trust God that

he is with the student while doing both, and finally with median of 5% with a verbal

interpretation as “Very High Level” for good financial status is one of the student

goals.

The data connote that the working students believe that the motivation is

important to them because it plays a crucial function in changing how learners

behave in regard to learning. Motivated students are better equipped to apply

newly learned material to novel circumstances. They frequently consider

underlying factors or conceptual frameworks, motivated students are better

equipped to apply newly learned material to novel circumstances.

This support the study of Robbins (2004) finds motivation seeks to

manipulate and reduce the gap exists between the performance of individual and

the goals and the objective of an organization.

C. Student Behavior

47
Table 11 The Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School
and College Working Students in terms of Student Behavior
Verbal
Statement Median
Interpretation
1. I see to it that I can attend my class
4 High Level
regularly.
2. I manage my time well to avoid conflict. 4 High Level
3. Because of my work experience, I can
4 High Level
share my knowledge in classroom.
4. I use social media for important matters
4 High Level
only.
5. I prioritize my assignment when I got home
4 High Level
to avoid backlogs.
Overall Level of Academic Performance of
the Senior High School and College Working 4 High Level
Students in terms of Student Behavior
Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –
Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

In terms of Student Behavior, a median of 4% with a verbal interpretation

as “High Level” for that the student see to it can attend class regularly, followed by

median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” for student manage time

well to avoid conflict, followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High

Level” that because of student work experience, he/she can share knowledge in

classroom, followed by median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level”

that the student use social media for important matters only, and finally with

median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as “High Level” that student prioritize

assignment when he/she got home to avoid backlogs.

The findings revealed that the working students is responsible to their

educational related chores in order to have excellent academic performance.

This supports the study of Poropat, Arthur (2009) that secondary academic

performance was controlled for Conscientiousness added as much to the

48
prediction of tertiary academic performance as did intelligence. Academic level

(primary, secondary, or tertiary), average age of participant, and the interaction

between academic level and age significantly moderated correlations with

academic performance.

Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School and College


Working Students
Table 12 The Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior High
School and College Working Students
Verbal
Variable Median
Interpretation
1.Learning 4 High Level
2.Motivation 5 Very High Level
3.Student Behavior 4 High Level
The Overall Level of Academic Performance
of the Senior High School and College 4 High Level
Working Students
Legend: 4.20-5.00 – Very High Level, 3.40-4.19 – High Level, 2.60-3.39 –
Average Level, 1.80-2.59 – Low Level, 1.00-1.79 – Very Low Level
(Pimentel, 2019)

Table 12 represented the median and verbal interpretation for the overall

level of academic performance of the Senior High School and College Working

Students. A median of 4 % with a verbal interpretation of High Level.

The results shows that the respondents believe that their level of

performance are affected by their part time job. Findings imply that having part

time jobs is not a barrier to perform well and improve their other skills that is related

in school matters

3. Is there a significant relationship between the academic performance

of the respondents and the profile of the students?

49
Table 13. Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the
Respondents When Grouped According to their Age
Variable Rho Degree of P- Decision Conclusion
Correlation Value
• Learning 0.012 No 0.928 Failed to Not
Correlation Reject Ho Significant
• Motivation 0.277 Weak 0.032 Reject Ho Significant
• Student Behavior 0.263 Weak 0.043 Reject Ho Significant
• Overall Academic 0.131 No 0.320 Failed to Not
Performance of the Correlation Reject Ho Significant
Senior High School
and College Working
Students
Legend: Significant if p<0.05; 0.60-0.79 Strong correlation, 0.40-0.59 Moderate
correlation, 0.20-0.39 Weak Correlation, 0.00-0.19 Very Weak / No correlation
(Evans, 1996)

Table 13 displays the test of relationship between the academic

performance of the respondents when grouped according to their age, Spearman

Rho Correlation was used. In terms of Learning, the rho value is 0.012 while the

probability value is 0.928 which means it has no correlation and not statistically

significant so the null hypothesis is accepted. In terms of Motivation, the rho value

is 0.277 while the probability value is 0.032 which means it has weak correlation

and statistically significant so the null hypothesis is rejected. In terms of Student

Behavior, the rho value is 0.263 while the probability value is 0.043 which means

it has weak correlation and statistically significant so the null hypothesis is rejected,

and for the Overall Academic Performance of the Senior High School and College

Working Students, the rho value is 0.131 while the probability value is 0.320 which

means it has no correlation and not statistically significant so the null hypothesis

is accepted.

50
The findings revealed that the working students age is not a barrier to

academic success, and lifetime involvement in cognitively stimulating activities as

well as specific cognitive abilities.

Contradict in our results, the study Grissom (2004) also found a positive

relationship between age and academic success for some of the older children in

his study. It also found that students who were older yet still age appropriate to

their peers did better academically than their younger classmates, but students

who were overage from previous retentions and other factors actually performed

worse academically than their peers.

Table 13.1 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the


Respondents When Grouped According to their Gender
P-
Variable X2 Decision Conclusion
value
• Learning Failed to
1.274 0.529 Reject Not Significant
Ho
• Motivation Failed to
2.504 0.286 Reject Not Significant
Ho
• Student Behavior Failed to
2.554 0.279 Reject Not Significant
Ho
• Overall Academic Failed to
Performance of the Senior
High School and College
0.741 0.690 Reject Not Significant
Working Students Ho
Table 13.1 displays test of relationship between the academic performance

of the respondents and their gender.

The results of Chi-square Test for Association revealed that learning,

motivation, student behavior, and overall academic performance of the senior high

school and college working students have no statistically significant relationship

with the gender of the respondents since the probability value for each bivariate is

51
greater than the significance level (p>0.05). In other words, learning, motivation,

student behavior, and overall academic performance of the senior high school and

college working students are not associated to academic performance.

The findings revealed that the working students’ gender doesn’t affect to

their academic performance.

This support our study of Pillow, (2008) has examined the gender

differences among student on their academic performance has reveal that in

individuals background characteristic affect his/her cognitive and non-cognitive is

one of the most significant and influential characteristics in academic performance.

Table 13.2 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the


Respondents When Grouped According to their Year/Grade Level

Variable Rho Degree of P- Decision Conclusion


Correlation Value
• Learning - Weak 0.021 Reject Ho Significant
0.297
• Motivation - Weak 0.038 Reject Ho Significant
0.269
• Student Behavior - No 0.180 Failed to Not
0.176 Correlation Reject Ho Significant
• Overall Academic - No 0.343 Failed to Not
Performance of the 0.125 Correlation Reject Ho Significant
Senior High School
and College Working
Students

52
Legend: Significant if p<0.05; 0.60-0.79 Strong correlation, 0.40-0.59 Moderate
correlation, 0.20-0.39 Weak Correlation, 0.00-0.19 Very Weak / No correlation
(Evans, 1996)

Table 13.2 displays the test of relationship between the academic

performance of the respondents when grouped according to their year/grade level,

Spearman Rho Correlation was used. In terms of Learning, the rho value is -0.297

while the probability value is 0.021 which means it has weak correlation and

statistically significant so the null hypothesis is rejected. In terms of Motivation, the

rho value is -0.269 while the probability value is 0.038 which means it has weak

correlation and statistically significant so the null hypothesis is rejected. In terms

of Student Behavior, the rho value is -0.176 while the probability value is 0.180

which means it has no correlation and not statistically significant so the null

hypothesis is accepted, and for the Overall Academic Performance of the Senior

High School and College Working Students, the rho value is -0.125 while the

probability value is 0.343 which means it has no correlation and not statistically

significant so the null hypothesis is accepted.

The findings revealed that the working students’ year/grade level doesn’t

affect to their academic performance.

This support the study of Mrs. D’s Corner (2023) that the Grade Level

expectations may be addressed next as a baseline for what students in the current

grade are expected to complete independently with a high degree of accuracy.

This is important because the ultimate goal is to help the child reach that Grade

Level proficiency and “catch up” to his peers.

53
Table 13.3 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the
Respondents When Grouped According to their General Weighted Average
(GWA)
Variable Rho Degree of P- Decision Conclusion
Correlation Value
• Learning - No 0.217 Failed to Not
0.162 Correlation Reject Ho Significant
• Motivation - Weak 0.035 Reject Ho Significant
0.273
• Student Behavior - Moderate 0.000 Reject Ho Significant
0.443
• Overall Academic - Weak 0.030 Reject Ho Significant
Performance of the 0.280
Senior High School
and College Working
Students
Legend: Significant if p<0.05; 0.60-0.79 Strong correlation, 0.40-0.59 Moderate
correlation, 0.20-0.39 Weak Correlation, 0.00-0.19 Very Weak / No correlation
(Evans, 1996)

Table 13.3 displays the test of relationship between the academic

performance of the respondents when grouped according to their general weighted

average, Spearman Rho Correlation was used. In terms of Learning, the rho value

is -0.162 while the probability value is 0.217 which means it has no correlation and

statistically not significant so the null hypothesis is accepted. In terms of

Motivation, the rho value is -0.273 while the probability value is 0.035 which means

it has weak correlation and statistically significant so the null hypothesis is rejected.

In terms of Student Behavior, the rho value is -0.443 while the probability value is

0.000 which means it has moderate correlation and statistically significant so the

null hypothesis is rejected, and for the Overall Academic Performance of the

Senior High School and College Working Students, the rho value is -0.280 while

the probability value is 0.030 which means it has weak correlation and statistically

significant so the null hypothesis is rejected.

54
The findings revealed that the working students’ General Weighted Average

is the best predictor of academic performance that classified as high-, average,

and low-achieving.

This support the study of Magpili & Mercado (2015) that Academic

performance remains to be measured through the ordinal scale of general

weighted average (GWA) and continues to be the best predictive variable

pertaining to academic success. A student is often labeled as high achieving,

average, and low achieving based on his or her GWA.

Table 13.4 Test of Relationship between the Academic Performance of the


Respondents When Grouped According to their Monthly Family Income

Variable Rho Degree of P- Decision Conclusion


Correlation Value
• Learning 0.066 No 0.617 Failed to Not
Correlation Reject Ho Significant
• Motivation 0.212 No 0.105 Failed to Not
Correlation Reject Ho Significant
• Student Behavior 0.075 No 0.570 Failed to Not
Correlation Reject Ho Significant
• Overall Academic 0.142 No 0.280 Failed to Not
Performance of the Correlation Reject Ho Significant
Senior High School
and College Working
Students
Legend: Significant if p<0.05; 0.60-0.79 Strong correlation, 0.40-0.59 Moderate
correlation, 0.20-0.39 Weak Correlation, 0.00-0.19 Very Weak / No correlation
(Evans, 1996)

55
Table 13.4 displays the test of relationship between the academic

performance of the respondents when grouped according to their monthly family

income, Spearman Rho Correlation was used. In terms of Learning, the rho value

is 0.066 while the probability value is 0.617 which means it has no correlation and

not statistically significant so the null hypothesis is accepted. In terms of

Motivation, the rho value is 0.212 while the probability value is 0.105 which means

it has no correlation and not statistically significant so the null hypothesis is

accepted. In terms of Student Behavior, the rho value is 0.075 while the probability

value is 0.570 which means it has no correlation and not statistically significant so

the null hypothesis is accepted, and for the Overall Academic Performance of the

Senior High School and College Working Students, the rho value is 0.142 while

the probability value is 0.280 which means it has no correlation and not statistically

significant so the null hypothesis is accepted.

The result shows that family income doesn’t affect the academic

performance of the working students.

Contradict in our results, the study of Pelaez, J. P. (2001) shows that Family

income and academic performance were significantly related to each other. Those

students belonging to high-income families have better grades than those students

who came from low-income families.

56
CHAPTER IV

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter summarized the results, conclusions and recommendations of

this study based on the assessment of working SHS and College respondents in

Red Link Institute of Science And Technology. A set of questionnaires was

administered to the respondents to assess the status of the academic performance

of senior high school and college working students it validated the significant

relationships on the assessment of the respondents relative to learning, motivation

and student behavior.

57
The conclusion is intended to help the reader understand about the

research. It is merely a synthesis of key points. It is the last, yet not the easiest

part. It summarizes the whole study and explains its purposes.

Summary of Findings

The presentation of the following finding in this study was based on the cited

problems under the Statement of the Problem.

1. On Demographic Profile of the Respondents

1.1 Age

Out of the 60 total number of respondents from Senior High School

and College students, (32) or 53.3 % of them are 21 years old to 30 years

old, (22) or 36.7% of them are 18-20 years old and the remaining (6) or 10

% are 31-40 years old.

1.2 Gender

Out of the 60 total number of respondents from Senior High School

and College students, (31) or 51.7% of them are female and the remaining

(29) or 48.3% are male.

1.2 Year/Grade Level

Out of the 60 total number of respondents from Senior High School and

College students, (16) or 26.7 % of them are fourth year college student,

(15) or 25.0% % are first year college student, (12) or 20.0% are third

year college student, (9) or 15.0% are Grade 11 Senior High School

58
student, (4) or 6.7% are second year college student, and the remaining

(4) or 6.7 % are Grade 12 Senior High School student.

1.3 General Weighted Average (GWA)

Out of the 60 total number of respondents from SHS and College

students (17 College Students) or 28.3% of them have GWA of 2.00 (86-

88%), (15 College Students) or 25.0% are GWA 1.75 (89-91%), (7

College Students) or 11.7% are GWA 1.50 (92-94%), followed by (6

Senior High School Students) or 10.0% of them have GWA of

Satisfactory (80-84%), (5 Senior High School Students) or 8.3% are Very

Satisfactory (85-89%), followed by (4 College Students) or 6.7% of them

have GWA of 1.25 (95-97%), followed by (3 College Students) or 5.0%

GWA of 3.00 (75%), followed by (1 College Student) or 1.7% GWA of

2.25 (83-85%), while (1 Senior High School Student) or 1.7% of them

have GWA of Outstanding (90-94%), and the remaining (1 Senior High

School Student) or 1.7% have GWA of Fairly Satisfactory (75-79%).

1.5 Monthly Family Income

Out of the 60 total number of respondents from Senior High School

and College students, (44) or 73.3% of them have a family income of less

than 20,000, followed by (13) or 13% of them have a family income of

Php 20,000 to Php 29,999, followed by (2) or 3.3% of them have a family

income of Php 40,000 and above and the remaining (1) or 1.7% of them

have a family income of Php 30,000 to Php 39,000.

59
2. On the level of Academic Performance of the Senior High School

and College Working Students in terms of Learning, Motivation and

Student Behavior:

2.1 Learning

In terms of Learning, a median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as

“High Level” for the Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior

High School and College Working Students under Class Participation.

In terms of Learning, a median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as

“High Level” for the Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior

High School and College Working Students under Task Performance.

In terms of Learning, a median of 4% with a verbal interpretation as

“High Level” for the Overall Level of Academic Performance of the Senior

High School and College Working Students under Comprehension.

2.2 Motivation

In terms of Motivation, a median of 5% with a verbal interpretation as

“Very High Level” for the Overall Level of Academic Performance of the

Senior High School and College Working Students.

2.3 Student Behavior

In terms of Student Behavior, a median of 4% with a verbal

interpretation as “High Level” for the Overall Level of Academic

Performance of the Senior High School and College Working Students.

60
3. On the Significant relationship between the academic performance

of the respondents when grouped according to their profile.

• The correlation between the academic performance variables of

the respondents in terms of age has no correlation or not

significant. The null hypothesis therefore is accepted.

• The correlation between the academic performance variables of

the respondents in terms of gender has no correlation or not

significant. The null hypothesis therefore is accepted.

• The correlation between the academic performance variables of

the respondents in terms of year/grade level has no correlation or

not significant. The null hypothesis therefore is accepted.

• The correlation between the academic performance variables of

the respondents in terms of general weighted average has weak

correlation or significant. The null hypothesis therefore is rejected.

• The correlation between the academic performance variables of

the respondents in terms of monthly family income has no

correlation or not significant. The null hypothesis therefore is

accepted.

Conclusions

• That most of the Senior High School and College working students

are ages 21 to 30 years old.

61
• The majority of the respondents were female. This is due to the fact

that there are more female (51.7%) about enrolled in this school year

than male (48.3%).

• Most of the respondents in terms of year/ grade level from College

students are 78.4% or (47) and 21.7% or (13) are Senior High School

students.

• That most of the College students have General Weighted Average

of 2.00 (86-88%). On the other hand, Senior High School students

have General Weighted Average of Satisfactory (80-84%).

• That most of the SHS and College Students provide evidence that

most of them have less than Php 20,000 monthly income.

• That the level of academic performance of SHS and College

students’ in Red Link Institute of Science And Technology in terms

of Learning, Motivation and Student Behavior plays an important

factor in encouraging students' participation, motivate them to gain

professional knowledge, help with understanding and managing

emotions, establishing and maintaining positive relationships, and

making responsible decisions that affects their academic

performance.

• That there is no significant relationship between the academic

performance when grouped according to age, gender, year/grade

level, and monthly family income.

62
• That there is significant relationship between the academic

performance when grouped according to general weighted average.

Recommendations

From the summary of findings and conclusions, the researcher is

recommends the following:

1. For the students, it is recommended to maintain and improve their

academic performance while working to avoid failing grades, to submit

all requirements on time.

2. For the lecturers, working while studying is a frequent reality today.

Because of this, lecturers should be aware of how their students are

actually doing in real world. Also, encourage the students to show their

skills and knowledge and allow them the share their experiences in their

job.

3. For the family of the working student, to motivate and always support

the needs and wants of the student.

4. Future researchers are suggested to conduct studies and may find this

study applicable tool to their future study related to this research and

also they may improve and fulfill the inadequacy of this study.

63
REFERENCES

64
Aggarwal, (2006). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of
Tomas Claudio Colleges. https://pdfcoffee.com/quotlevel-of-academic-
performance-of-the-working-students-of-tomas-claudio-collegesquot-
chapter-1-5-pdf-free.html

Ahmed, W., & Bruinsma, M. (2006). A structural model of self-concept,


autonomous motivation and academic performance in cross-
cultural perspective

Alcovendas and Espares (2013). Level of Academic Performance of the Working


Students of Tomas Claudio Colleges .www.academia.edu/24118915

Angelo Dulas, (2010). Impacts towards Academic Performanceof the Working


Students in ICCT Colleges. https://studylib.net/doc/25640961/research-
chapters

Arbabi, T., Vollmer, C., Dörfler, T., & Randler, C. (2015). The influence of
chronotype and intelligence on academic achievement in primary school is
mediated by conscientiousness, midpoint of sleep and motivation.
Chronobiology International, 32(3), 349-357.
https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.980508

Bandura, A. (1995). Exercise of personal and collective efficacy in changing


societies. Self-efficacy in Changing Societies, 15, 334.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527692.003

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.


Psychological Review, 84(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-
295X.84.2.191

Baum. (2010). Problems encountered by working students. Academia.edu -


Share research.
https://www.academia.edu/38231750/Problems_encountered_by_working
_students

Becker, G.S. (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75(299):
493–517. 10.1111/joes.12301.

65
Bialik, M., Fadel, C., Trilling, B., Nilsson, P., & Groff, J. (2015). Skills for the 21st
Century: What should students Learn. Centre for Curriculum Redesign,
Boston, Massachusetts.

Bipp, T., & van Dam, K. (2014). Extending hierarchical achievement motivation
models: The role of motivational needs for achievement goals and
academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 157-
162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.039

Callender, C. (2008). The impact of term-time employment on higher education


students’ academic attainment and achievement. Journal of Education
Policy, 23(4), 359–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680930801924490

Carnevale, A.P, Smith, N., Melton, M., & Price, E.W. (2015). Learning while
earning: The new normal. Georgetown University Center on Education
and the Workforce. Retrieved from https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-
content/uploads/Working-Learners-Report.pdf.

Cassidy, T., & Lynn, R. (1989). A multifactorial approach to achievement


motivation: The development of a comprehensive measure. Journal of
Occupational Psychology, 62(4), 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07252-
000

Cherry, K. (2016). Motivation: Psychological factors that guide behavior.


Pridobljeno, 15(12), 2016.

Chinn, (2009). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of


Tomas Claudio Colleges .www.academia.edu/24118915

Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary school students’ motivation and
achievement in combined science. Online Submission, 3(4), 213-228.

Coleman, J. S. (1961). The adolescent society: Academic achievement and the


structure of competition. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.

Conley, S., & You, S. (2009). Teacher Role Stress, Satisfaction, Commitment,
and Intentions to Leave: A Structural Model. Psychological Reports, 105,
771-786. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/PR0.105.3.771-786

Corr, P.J. and Matthews, G. (Eds.) (2009). The Cambridge handbook of


personality psychology (pp. 748-763). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511596544

Curtis, S. (2007). Students' perceptions of the effects of term-time paid


employment. Education+ Training, 49(5), 380-390.

66
Curtis, S., & Shani, N. (2002). The effect of taking paid employment during term-
time on students' academic studies. Journal of Further and Higher
Education, 26(2), 129-138.

Dalkir, K. (2013). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Routledge.


https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080547367

Darst, (2007). Individual and Situational Interest: The Role of Gender and Skill.
Contemporary Educational Psychology. 27. 250-269.
10.1006/ceps.2001.1093.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human
needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4),
227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and


psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian
Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9

De Guzman, De Castro, (2011). Employment and employability profile of a select


group of Filipino college graduates. 5. 63-81.

Dela Cruz, (2014). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of


Tomas Claudio Colleges .www.academia.edu/24118915

Demmert, William., Jr (2006). Improving Academic Performance among Native


American Students: A Review of the Research Literature.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463917.pdf

Dunca. (2019). FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF


THE WORKING. www.academia.edu/5323781

Eastwold, (2014). Factors Associated with Absenteeism in High Schools -


ERIChttps://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/30501

Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific


Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.

Feden, (2006). The Influence of the Language of Instruction on Students’


Academic Performance in Secondary Schools: A comparative study of
urban and rural schools in Arusha-Tanzania. Feden
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/30884744

67
Feldman, D. B., & Kubota, M. (2015). Hope, self-efficacy, optimism, and
academic achievement: Distinguishing constructs and levels of specificity
in predicting college grade-point average. Learning and Individual
Differences, 37, 210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.022

Furr and Elling. (2000). The Influence of Work on College Student Development.
ResearchGate | Find and share research.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234640918_The_Influence_of_
Work_on_College_Student_Development

Ghafournia & Afghari, (2013). Language Learning Strategy Use and Reading
Achievement. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1075716

Gilani, (2012). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of


Tomas Claudio Colleges .www.academia.edu/24118915

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative” description of personality”: the big-five


factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6),
1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216

Gredler, M. B. (1986). A taxonomy of computer simulations. Educational


Technology, 26(4), 7-12.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of
educational objectives, handbook ii: affective domain. David McKay
Company. Inc.

Grissom, J.B. (2004). Age and achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives,
12(49). Retrieved November 10, 2010, from
http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v12n49/.

Hakimi, S., Hejazi, E., & Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The relationships between
personality traits and students’ academic achievement. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 836-845.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.312

Helker, K., & Wosnitza, M. (2016). The interplay of students’ and parents’
responsibility judgements in the school context and their associations with
student motivation and achievement. International Journal of Educational
Research, 76, 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.01.001

Hill and Tyson, (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic


assessment of the strategies that promote achievement.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19413429/

68
Hornstra, L., van der Veen, I., Peetsma, T., & Volman, M. (2013). Developments
in motivation and achievement during primary school: A longitudinal study
on group-specific differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 23,
195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.09.004

Horowitz (2012), Configurational analysis: States of mind, person schemas, and


the control of ideas and affect. In T. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of
psychotherapy case formulation (2nd ed., pp. 136-163). New York:
Guilford.

Jewell, 2014. 2in1strugglesofworkingstudents.


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331815496_2in1strugglesofworki
ngstudents/citation/download

Kasworm (2010). Problems encountered by working students.


https://pdfcoffee.com/problems-encountered-by-working-students-pdf-
free.html

Katigbak, Marcia S., (2010). A Four-Culture Study of Self-Enhancement and


Adjustment Using the Social Relations Model: Do Alternative
Conceptualizations and Indices Make a Difference.
www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Marcia-S-Katigbak-
39044401

Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin et al (2021). Behavior and Attitude of Students in the


New Normal Perspective of Learning. EAS J PsycholBehavSci, 3(2), 21

Lindström, B., & Eriksson, M. (2011). From health education to healthy learning:
implementing salutogenesis in educational science. Scandinavian Journal
of Public Health, 39(6_suppl), 85-92.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393560

Lorenciana, C.,2014. Cause and effect; The rising costs of education | The
Freeman (Philstar.com) - Google search. Google.
https://www.google.com/search?q=Cause+and+effect%3B+The+rising+co
sts+of+education+%7C+The+Freeman+%28Philstar.com%29&source=hp
&ei=GVDGY6cCNSl2roPxZKQmAs&iflsig=AK50M_UAAAAAY8ZeKZJQFp
t3YESDNZeAAaHOoicYD_z9&ved=0ahUKEwjvjM6djM78AhXUklYBHUUJ
BLMQ4dUDCAg&uact=5&oq=Cause+and+effect%3B+The+rising+costs+
of+education+%7C+The+Freeman+%28Philstar.com%29&gs_lcp=Cgdnd
3Mtd2l6EANQAFgAYPgEaABwAHgAgAFxiAFxkgEDMC4xmAEAoAECoA
EB&sclient=gws-wiz

69
Magpili & Mercado (2015). Non-Cognitive Factors Affecting the Academic
Performance of Fourth Year College Students of a Private College in
Manila. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1216511.pdf

Masikip, (2012). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of


Tomas Claudio Colleges .www.academia.edu/24118915

Matheuws, K. B. (2018). The working time-poor: Time poverty implications for


working students’ involvement. Doctoral Dissertation. USA: Ohio
University.

McBurney, D. & White, T. (2009). Research Methods. New York, NY: Cengage
Learning. https://ivypanda.com/essays/descriptive-statistics-and-
correlational-design

Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What makes a good student? How
emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic
achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546

Mrs. D’s Corner. (2023). The Difference in Student Levels: Grade Level,
Instructional Level, and Ability Level.
https://www.mrsdscorner.com/difference-in-student-levels/

Nauzeer, S., & Jaunky, V. C. (2021). A Meta-Analysis of the Combined Effects of


Motivation, Learning and Personality Traits on Academic Performance.
Pedagogical Research, 6(3), em0097. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/10963

Nelson Mandela. (n.d). Oxford Reference.


https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/acref/9780191843730.0
01.0001/q-oro-ed5
00007046;jsessionid=B2B2F5E8CC37A64E6D8C18402E114FEC

Nelita M Lalican, (2008). Tracer Survey of Agriculture Graduates. https:


/file/p2cpikl/

Perry, Richard. (2010). Academic Emotions in Students' Self-Regulated Learning


and Achievement: A Program of Qualitative and Quantitative Research.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4

Phakiti, Aek. (2006). A Closer Look at the Relationship of Cognitive and


Metacognitive Strategy Use to EFL Reading Achievement Test
Performance. Language Testing - LANG TEST. 20. 26-56.
10.1191/0265532203lt243oa.

70
Passini, S., Molinari, L., & Speltini, G. (2015). A validation of the questionnaire on
teacher interaction in Italian secondary school students: The effect of
positive relations on motivation and academic achievement. Social
Psychology of Education, 18(3), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-
015-9300-3

Paynter, D. E., Bodrova, E., & Doty, J. K. (2005). For the love of words:
Vocabulary instruction that works. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544614

Pelaez, J. P. (2001). Relationship between peer choice and academic


performance of junior students in Mina National High School (Unpublished
Master's thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.
https://repository.cpu.edu.ph/handle/20.500.12852/475?show=full&locale-
attribute=fil

Peltzer, K., & Pengpid, S. (2014). Health behaviour and self-reported academic
performance among university students: An international study.
Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(27), 998–1005. [Google
Scholar]

Pillow, B. (2008). A comparison of academic performance in A- level economics


between two years: International Review of Economics Education, 2 (1),
8-24

Pimentel, J. L. (2019). Some biases in likert scaling usage and its correction.
International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR).
45. 183-191.

Pinto, M. B., Parente, D.H & Palmer, D.T. (2001). College student performance
and credit card usage. Journal of college student development, 42(1), 49-
58.

Poropat, Arthur E., (2009). A Meta-Analysis of the Five-Factor Model of


Personality and Academic Performance. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ830680

Pusser, B. (2010). Of a mind to labor: Reconceptualizing student work and higher


education. In Perna L.W. (Ed.). Understanding the Working College
Student: New Research and its Implications for Policy and Practice.
Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Rajeev Darolia. (2014). The Lived Experiences of UIC SHS Working Students A
Phenomenological Study.pdf. https://The%20Lived%20Experiences%20
of%20UIC%20SHS%20Working%20Students%20A%20Phenomenologica
l%20Study.pdf

71
Richardson, et. Al. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’
academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353–387. doi:10.1037/a0026838.

Rivera, (2007). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of


Tomas Claudio Colleges. https://pdfcoffee.com/quotlevel-of-academic-
performance-of-the-working-students-of-tomas-claudio-collegesquot-
chapter-1-5-pdf-free.html

Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004).
Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-
analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-
2909.130.2.261

Roeser, R. W., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Jha, A., Cullen, M., Wallace, L., Wilensky,
R., Taylor, C., & Harrison, J. (2013). Mindfulness training and reductions
in teacher stress and burnout: Results from two randomized, waitlist-
control field trials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 787.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032093

Scott, (2006). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of


Tomas Claudio Colleges. https://pdfcoffee.com/quotlevel-of-academic-
performance-of-the-working-students-of-tomas-claudio-collegesquot-
chapter-1-5-pdf-free.html

Skaalvik, E. M., Federici, R. A., & Klassen, R. M. (2015). Mathematics


achievement and self-efficacy: Relations with motivation for mathematics.
International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 129-136.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.623

Snyder, T., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015
(NCES 2016-014). Washington, DC: National Center for Education
Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of
Education. [Google Scholar]

Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87,


355-374. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010

Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., &
Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting
school achievement over time: The unique role of intrinsic motivation.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.08.002

72
Torres, (2005). Level of Academic Performance of the Working Students of
Tomas Claudio Colleges .www.academia.edu/24118915

Triventi, et, al. (2014). Working (and studying) day and night: Heterogeneous
effects of working on the academic performance of full-time and part-time
students. Economics of Education Review. 38.
10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.10.004.

Velasco, (2014). No summer break for working students.


https://www.philstar.com/other-sections/campus/2014/06/05/1331431/no-
summer-break-working-students

Wang, H., Kong, M., Shan, W.,& Bong, S.(2010). The Effects of Doing Part-Time
Jobs on College Student Academic Performance and Social Life in a
Chinese Society. Journal of Education and Work, 23(1), 79-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080903418402

Waseka, E. L., & Simatwa, E. M. W. (2016). Student factors influencing


academic performance of students in secondary education in Kenya: A
case study of Kakamega County. Educational Research, 7(3), 72-87.

Watts, C., & Pickering, A. (2000). Pay as you learn: Student employment and
academic progress. Education+ Training, 42(3), 129-135

Weiner, B. (1990). History of motivational research in education. Journal of


Educational Psychology, 82(4), 616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-
0663.82.4.616

Yap, K. G. (2012). Reality beyond belief: Understanding why you believe what
you believe. BalboaPress.

73
APPENDICES

74
APPENDIX A

LETTER OF REQUEST
(COLLEGE LIST OF WORKING STUDENT ENROLLEES)

75
October 11, 2022

MRS. GENNELYN GRACE P. MACAPAGAL


School Registrar

Dear Ma’am:

Good Day!

We, Jayson C. Calatin, Abegiel N. Capuso, Jewel Rose T. Soliman, Jillianne


Rose T. Soliman, and Salve C. Sucab taking Bachelor of Science in Accountancy
are currently writing our research study entitled “STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE WORKING
STUDENTS.” as requirement of the degree.

In this regard, we would like to request a list of working college students


who are currently enrolled in this Academic Year 2022 - 2023.

Your affirmative response concerning this matter is whole-heartedly


appreciated. Thank you and God Bless.

Respectfully yours,

CALATIN, JAYSON C.

CAPUSO, ABEGIEL N.

SOLIMAN, JEWEL ROSE T.

SOLIMAN, JILLIANNE ROSE T.

SUCAB, SALVE C

76
APPENDIX B
SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

77
STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
AND COLLEGE WORKING STUDENTS

The researchers inviting you to participate in this research by completing the


following survey. The purpose of this survey is to determine the STATUS OF THE
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE
WORKING STUDENTS. The following questionnaire will require approximately 5-
10 minutes to complete.

Rest assured that any information that will be given would be treated with
confidentiality and will be utilized only to the purpose.

Thank you for taking your time in assisting this research. God bless you.

Sincerely,
Calatin, Jayson C.
Capuso, Abegiel N.
Soliman, Jewel Rose T.
Soliman, Jillianne Rose T.
Sucab, Salve C.

PART 1- A. Profile of Respondents


Name of Respondent: (Optional)________________________________
Year / Grade Level: ______________________________
Course / Strand: ______________________________

PART 1- B. Please put an ✓ mark that corresponds to your answer


1. What is the profile of the Respondents
1.1 Age
❒ 18 to 20 years old
❒ 21 to 30 years old
❒ 31 to 40 years old

78
1.2 Gender
( ) Male ( ) Female

1.3 Year/Grade Level


❒ 1st Year College
❒ 2nd Year College
❒ 3rd Year College
❒ 4th Year College
❒ Grade 11 Senior High School
❒ Grade 12 Senior High School

1.4 General Weighted Average (GWA) – For College Student Only:


❒ 1.00 (98-100%)
❒ 1.25 (95-97%)
❒ 1.50 (92-94%)
❒ 1.75 (89-91%)
❒ 2.00 (86-88%)
❒ 2.25 (83-85%)
❒ 2.50 (80-82%)
❒ 2.75 (76-79%)
❒ 3.00 (75%)

General Weighted Average (GWA) – For Senior High School Student


Only:
❒ Outstanding (90-100%)
❒ Very Satisfactory (85-89%)
❒ Satisfactory (80-84%)
❒ Fairly Satisfactory (75-79%)

79
1.5 Monthly Family Income
❒ Less than 20,000
❒ 20,000 to 29,999
❒ 30,000 to 39,999
❒ 40,000 and above

Part II. Assessment based on the Identified Variables


Direction: Please put ✓mark that corresponds to your answer.

Use the following rating scales:

Scale Symbol Points


Strongly Agree SA 5
Agree A 4
Uncertain U 3
Disagree D 2
Strongly Disagree SD 1

A. Learning
2.1 Class Participation
SA A U D S
(5) (4) (3) (2) D
(1)
Enhance my study habits
Share thoughts or ideas during the lesson.
Capture my eagerness and enthusiasm for the
lesson.
Take an active role in class.
Create my own study habits

80
2.2 Task Performance
SA A U D S
(5) (4) (3) (2) D
(1)
Willing to participate actively in the discussion.
Adapt to daily learning activities.
Boost my involvement in group activities.
Can provide variety of activities to increase my
participation in class.
Improve my willingness to take part in group
discussions.

2.3 Comprehension
SA A U D S
(5) (4) (3) (2) D
(1)
My teacher explains the concept of lesson very
clear.
I do understand the lesson by completely
analyzing the subject matter.
I am equip in English language to understand the
lesson.
My ability to understand the subject matter is easy
for me.
My comprehension still needs to improve.

B. Motivation
SA A U D S
(5) (4) (3) (2) D
(1)
My family encourage me to pursue study
For my family to have better life.
Working is an additional learning for my future
journey.

81
I trust God that he is with me while I am doing
both.
Good financial status is one of my goals.

C. Student Behavior
SA A U D S
(5) (4) (3) (2) D
(1)
I see to it that I can attend my class regularly.
I manage my time well to avoid conflict.
Because of my work experience, I can share my
knowledge in classroom.
I use social media for important matters only.
I prioritize my assignment when I got home to
avoid backlogs.

82
APPENDIX C

LETTER OF REQUEST
(CONDUCT OF ONLINE SURVEY)

83
November 24, 2022

Dear Ma’am:

Good Day!

We, Jayson C. Calatin, Abegiel N. Capuso, Jewel Rose T. Soliman, Jillianne


Rose T. Soliman, and Salve C. Sucab taking Bachelor of Science in Accountancy
are currently writing our research study entitled “STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE WORKING
STUDENTS” as requirement of the degree.

In this regard, we would like to ask permission from your good office to allow
our group to conduct an online survey with the currently enrolled Senior High
School and College working students.

Rest assured that the data to be collected would be treated with


confidentiality and will be utilized only to the purpose of this study.

Your affirmative response concerning this matter is whole-heartedly


appreciated. Thank you and May God bless you.

Respectfully yours,

CALATIN, JAYSON C.

CAPUSO, ABEGIEL N.

SOLIMAN, JEWEL ROSE T.

SOLIMAN, JILLIANNE ROSE T.

SUCAB, SALVE C.

Noted by:

EVANGELINE G. SAPNU, MBA, D Hum

84
APPENDIX D

LETTER TO THE RESPONDENTS

85
November 24, 2022

Dear Respondents,

The undersigned are conducting a thesis study entitled “STATUS OF THE


ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE
WORKING STUDENTS” as partial fulfillment for the degree of Bachelor of Science
in Accountancy.

In this regard, may we solicit your utmost cooperation by answering the


attached questionnaires to generate the data to achieve the objectives of the study.

Rest assured that any information that will be given would be treated with
confidentiality and will be utilized only to the purpose.

Thank you very much.

Respectfully yours,

CALATIN, JAYSON C.

CAPUSO, ABEGIEL N.

SOLIMAN, JEWEL ROSE T.

SOLIMAN, JILLIANNE ROSE T.

SUCAB, SALVE C.

Noted by:

EVANGELINE G. SAPNU, MBA, D Hum


Research Professor

86
APPENDIX E

LETTER FOR STATISTICIAN REQUEST

87
December 6, 2022

MR. NOEL P. MUNDA


College Instructor

Dear Sir:

Good day!

We, Jayson C. Calatin, Abegiel N. Capuso, Jewel Rose T. Soliman, Jillianne


Rose T. Soliman and Salve C. Sucab taking Bachelor of Science in Accountancy
are currently writing our research study “STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC
PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE WORKING
STUDENTS” as requirement of the degree

In this regard, we are writing to humbly request your service and expertise
to serve as a statistician for our research study. We believe that your knowledge
and insights will be valuable and will greatly enrich our works.

Your affirmative response concerning this matter is whole-heartedly


appreciated. Thank you and May God bless you a thousand folds.

Respectfully yours,

CALATIN, JAYSON C.

CAPUSO, ABEGIEL N.

SOLIMAN, JEWEL ROSE T.

SOLIMAN, JILLIANNE ROSE T.

SUCAB, SALVE

88
APPENDIX F

STATISTICIAN’S CERTIFICATION

89
STATISTICIAN’S CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that the undergraduate thesis entitled "STATUS OF THE

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE

WORKING STUDENTS" prepared and submitted by JAYSON C. CALATIN,

ABEGIEL N. CAPUSO, JEWEL ROSE T. SOLIMAN, JILLIANNE ROSE T.

SOLIMAN, and SALVE C. SUCAB, in partial fulfilment of requirements for the

degree of Bachelor of Science in Accountancy, has been statistically

reviewed by the undersigned.

NOEL P. MUNDA
Research Statistician
Master Teacher I and Research Coordinator, DepEd Gulod
NHS-ME,Cabuyao City Division
Division Statistician (SDRC), DepEd City Schools Division of Cabuyao, Laguna
noel.munda@deped.gov.ph

90
APPENDIX G

LANGUAGE EDITOR’S CERTIFICATION

91
LANGUAGE EDITOR’S CERTIFICATION

This is to certify that this thesis entitled “STATUS OF THE ACADEMIC


PERFORMANCE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL AND COLLEGE WORKING
STUDENTS” by Jayson C. Calatin, Abegiel N. Capuso, Jewel Rose T. Soliman,
Jillianne Rose T. Soliman and Salve C. Sucab, Bachelor of Science in
Accountancy students has been subjected to Language Editing at Red Link
Institute of Science and Technology by the undersigned.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Language Editor

92
APPENDIX H

SPSS OUTPUTS

93
APPENDIX
SPSS OUTPUTS
SOP 1

Frequency Table
Age
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 22 36.7 36.7 36.7
2.00 32 53.3 53.3 90.0
3.00 6 10.0 10.0 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Gender
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 29 48.3 48.3 48.3
2.00 31 51.7 51.7 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Year / Grade Level


Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 15 25.0 25.0 25.0
2.00 4 6.7 6.7 31.7
3.00 12 20.0 20.0 51.7
4.00 16 26.7 26.7 78.3
5.00 9 15.0 15.0 93.3
6.00 4 6.7 6.7 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

94
GWA
Percen Valid Cumulative
Frequency t Percent Percent
Valid 2.00 4 6.7 6.7 6.7
3.00 7 11.7 11.7 18.3
4.00 15 25.0 25.0 43.3
5.00 17 28.3 28.3 71.7
6.00 1 1.7 1.7 73.3
9.00 3 5.0 5.0 78.3
10.00 1 1.7 1.7 80.0
11.00 5 8.3 8.3 88.3
12.00 6 10.0 10.0 98.3
13.00 1 1.7 1.7 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

Monthly Income
Frequenc Valid Cumulative
y Percent Percent Percent
Valid 1.00 44 73.3 73.3 73.3
2.00 13 21.7 21.7 95.0
3.00 1 1.7 1.7 96.7
4.00 2 3.3 3.3 100.0
Total 60 100.0 100.0

95
SOP 2
QUESTION MEDIAN
Q1 4
Q2 4
Q3 4
Q4 4
Q5 4
Class Participation 4
Q1 4
Q2 4
Q3 4
Q4 4
Q5 4
Task Performance 4
Q1 4
Q2 4
Q3 4
Q4 4
Q5 4
Comprehension 4
Overall Learning 4
Q1 5
Q2 5
Q3 5
Q4 5
Q5 5
Motivation 5
Q1 4
Q2 4
Q3 4
Q4 4
Q5 4
Student Behavior 4
OVERALL ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE 4

96
SOP 3

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlations
Age Learn Motivati Studen Overall
ing on t Academic
Behavi Performan
or ce
Spear Age Correlation
1.000 .012 .277* .263* .131
man’s Coefficient
Rho Sig. (2-
. .928 .032 .043 .320
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Learnin Correlation
.277* .390** 1.000 .244 .441**
g Coefficient
Sig. (2-
.032 .002 . .060 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
OVERA Correlation .131 .697** .441** .745** 1.000
LL Coefficient
ACADE
MIC
PERFO
RMANC
E
Sig. (2- .320 .000 .000 .000 .
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

97
Relationship between Dependent variable and Gender

Crosstabs
Learning * Gender
Crosstab
Count
Gender
1.00 2.00 Total
Learning 3. 4 2 6
00
4. 19 24 43
00
5. 6 5 11
00
Total 29 31 60

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1.274a 2 .529
Likelihood Ratio 1.287 2 .526
Linear-by-Linear .041 1 .839
Association
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5.
The minimum expected count is 2.90.

Motivation * Gender
Crosstab
Count
Gender
1.00 2.00 Total
Motivatio 3.00 1 0 1
n 4.00 7 4 11
5.00 21 27 48
Total 29 31 60

98
Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Value df Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.504a 2 .286
Likelihood Ratio 2.900 2 .235
Linear-by-Linear 2.385 1 .122
Association
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is .48.

Behavior * Gender
Crosstab
Count
Gender
1.00 2.00 Total
Behavio 3.00 5 4 9
r 4.00 19 16 35
5.00 5 11 16
Total 29 31 60

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic Significance
Value df (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 2.554a 2 .279
Likelihood Ratio 2.608 2 .271
Linear-by-Linear 1.864 1 .172
Association
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum
expected count is 4.35.

99
Overall * Gender
Crosstab
Count
Gender
1.00 2.00 Total
Overal 3.00 2 1 3
l 4.00 19 19 38
5.00 8 11 19
Total 29 31 60

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Value df Significance (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .741a 2 .690
Likelihood Ratio .749 2 .688
Linear-by-Linear .667 1 .414
Association
N of Valid Cases 60
a. 2 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The
minimum expected count is 1.45.

100
Correlations
Year Learn Motivati Studen Overall
Grad ing on t Academic
e Behavi Performan
Level or ce
Spear Year Correlation 1.000 -.297* -.269* -.176 -.125
man’s Grade Coefficient
Rho Level Sig. (2- . .021 .038 .180 .343
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Learnin Correlation -.297* 1.000 .390** .387** .697**
g Coefficient
Sig. (2- .021 . .002 .002 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Motivati Correlation -.269* .390** 1.000 .244 .441**
on Coefficient
Sig. (2- .038 .002 . .060 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Stud Correlation -.176 .387** .244 1.000 .745**
Behavio Coefficient
r
Sig. (2- .180 .002 .060 . .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
OVERA Correlation -.125 .697** .441** .745** 1.000
LL Coefficient
ACADE
MIC
PERFO
RMANC
E
Sig. (2- .343 .000 .000 .000 .
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

101
Correlations
Learn Motivati Studen Overall
GWA ing on t Academic
Behavi Performan
or ce
Spear GWA Correlation 1.000 -.162 -.273* -.443** -.280*
man’s Coefficient
Rho Sig. (2- . .217 .035 .000 .030
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Learnin Correlation -.162 1.000 .390** .387** .697**
g Coefficient
Sig. (2- .217 . .002 .002 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Motivati Correlation -.273* .390** 1.000 .244 .441**
on Coefficient
Sig. (2- .035 .002 . .060 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Stud Correlation - .387** .244 1.000 .745**
Behavio Coefficient .443**
r
Sig. (2- .000 .002 .060 . .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
OVERA Correlation -.280* .697** .441** .745** 1.000
LL Coefficient
ACADE
MIC
PERFO
RMANC
E
Sig. (2- .030 .000 .000 .000 .
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

102
Correlations
Learn Motivati Studen Overall
Mont ing on t Academic
hly Behavi Performan
Inco or ce
me
Spear Monthly Correlation 1.000 .066 .212 .075 .142
man’s Income Coefficient
Rho Sig. (2- . .617 .105 .570 .280
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Learnin Correlation .066 1.000 .390** .387** .697**
g Coefficient
Sig. (2- .617 . .002 .002 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Motivati Correlation .212 .390** 1.000 .244 .441**
on Coefficient
Sig. (2- .105 .002 . .060 .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
Stud Correlation .075 .387** .244 1.000 .745**
Behavio Coefficient
r
Sig. (2- .570 .002 .060 . .000
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
OVERA Correlation .142 .697** .441** .745** 1.000
LL Coefficient
ACADE
MIC
PERFO
RMANC
E
Sig. (2- .280 .000 .000 .000 .
tailed)
N 60 60 60 60 60
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

103
CURRICULUM VITAE

104
JAYSON C. CALATIN
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba
City, Laguna
calatinjayson2@gmail.com
09504637360

PERSONAL DATA

Birthday : April 24, 1991


Birth Place : Calamba, Laguna
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
August 2019 - present

Secondary Education
Camp Vicente Lim National High School.
Canlubang, Calamba City, Laguna
2014

Elementary Education
Paciano Rizal Elementary School.
Paciano, Calamba City, Laguna
2005

105
WORK EXPERIENCES

NATURE OF WORK/
POSITION
Production Assembler
Fastech Electronics Inc.
LISP 1, Pulo, Cabuyao, Laguna
2020 - present
Production Line Leader
Fujifilm Optics
CIP 1
2016 - 2020
Quality Assurance
THN Autoparts
CPIP
2015 - 2016

106
ABEGIEL N. CAPUSO
153 Captain Perlas Street, Barangay
Pooc, City of Santa Rosa, Laguna
abeng.capuso@gmail.com
09494889443

PERSONAL DATA

Birthday : August 22, 1998


Birth Place : Santa Rosa, Laguna
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
August 2019 - present

Associate Graduate in Information Technology


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
2017

Secondary Education
Balibago National High School
Kabesang Moldes St., Brgy. Balibago, City of Santa Rosa, Laguna
2014

Elementary Education
Jose Rizal Memorial Elementary School
Barangay Pooc, City of Santa Rosa, Laguna
2010

107
WORK EXPERIENCES

NATURE OF WORK/
POSITION
School Cashier / Record Assistant
Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
2017 - present

SEMINARS/ WORKSHOP ATTENDED

* 13th Business Student Summit


The 21st Century Business Students: Inspired, Collaborative, Enterprising”
Quezon Convention Center, Lucena City, Quezon
November 22, 2019

* First Division Management Committee Meeting for Private Schools


Chipeco Hall, Jose Rizal Memorial School, Calamba City
January 24, 2018

* Japanese Language Seminar


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Bgry. San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
March 5, 2017

108
JEWEL ROSE T. SOLIMAN
Blk 20 Lot 2 MCDC Mainroad
Kapayapaan Ville Canlubang
Calamba City, Laguna.
solimanjewel4@gmail.com
09856934626

PERSONAL DATA

Birthday : December 13, 1998


Birth Place : Sta.Cruz, Manila
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
August 2019 - present

Associate Graduate in Computerized Office Management


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
2017

Secondary Education
Kapayapaan Integrated School
Manfil, City of Calamba, Laguna
2014

Elementary Education
San Ramon Elementary School
Manfil, Barangay Canlubang, City of Santa Rosa, Laguna
2010

109
WORK EXPERIENCES

NATURE OF WORK/
POSITION
Accounting Staff
Laguna Industrial Health Clinic, Inc.
Barangay Paciano, Calamba City, Laguna
2020 - present

SEMINARS/ WORKSHOP ATTENDED

* 13th Business Student Summit


The 21st Century Business Students: Inspired, Collaborative, Enterprising”
Quezon Convention Center, Lucena City, Quezon
November 22, 2019

110
JILLIANNE ROSE T. SOLIMAN
Blk 20 Lot 2 MCDC Mainroad
Kapayapaan Ville Canlubang
Calamba City, Laguna.
jilliannesoliman@gmail.com
09976531377

PERSONAL DATA

Birthday : April 08, 2000


Birth Place : Sta.Cruz, Manila
Civil Status : Single
Nationality : Filipino

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
August 2019 - present

SHS Accountancy, Business, and Management Strand


Kapayapaan Integrated School
Manfil, City of Calamba, Laguna
2019

Secondary Education
Kapayapaan Integrated School
Manfil, City of Calamba, Laguna
2017

Elementary Education
San Ramon Elementary School
Manfil, Barangay Canlubang, City of Santa Rosa, Laguna
2012

111
WORK EXPERIENCES

NATURE OF WORK/
POSITION
Customer Representative
Gelyna Cosmetics
Brgy. Tanauan Plaridel Quezon City, Philippines
2020 - 2022

112
SALVE C. SUCAB

Barangay Parian, Calamba City, Laguna


sucabsalve05@gmail.com
09164170772

PERSONAL DATA

Birthday : October 5, 1993


Birth Place : Mobo, Masbate City
Civil Status : Married
Nationality : Filipino

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Bachelor of Science in Accountancy


Red Link Institute of Science And Technology
Barangay San Cristobal, Calamba City, Laguna
August 2019 - present

Secondary Education
Floro L. Medina Memorial High School
Sta. Maria, Mobo, Masbate City
2007

Elementary Education
Lomocloc Elementary School
Lomocloc, Mobo, Masbate
2003

113
WORK EXPERIENCES

NATURE OF WORK/
POSITION
Online Seller
2020 - present

SEMINARS/ WORKSHOP ATTENDED

* 13th Business Student Summit


The 21st Century Business Students: Inspired, Collaborative, Enterprising”
Quezon Convention Center, Lucena City, Quezon
November 22, 2019

114

You might also like