The document provides guidance on overcoming barriers to effective decision making. It outlines five steps: 1) framing the decision, 2) identifying alternative actions, 3) evaluating alternatives against objectives, 4) deciding, and 5) implementing and monitoring. It then discusses techniques for improving group decision making such as preventing groupthink, encouraging devil's advocacy, using nominal groups like the stepladder technique or Delphi method. The goal is to avoid bias toward shared information and predictable surprises.
The document provides guidance on overcoming barriers to effective decision making. It outlines five steps: 1) framing the decision, 2) identifying alternative actions, 3) evaluating alternatives against objectives, 4) deciding, and 5) implementing and monitoring. It then discusses techniques for improving group decision making such as preventing groupthink, encouraging devil's advocacy, using nominal groups like the stepladder technique or Delphi method. The goal is to avoid bias toward shared information and predictable surprises.
The document provides guidance on overcoming barriers to effective decision making. It outlines five steps: 1) framing the decision, 2) identifying alternative actions, 3) evaluating alternatives against objectives, 4) deciding, and 5) implementing and monitoring. It then discusses techniques for improving group decision making such as preventing groupthink, encouraging devil's advocacy, using nominal groups like the stepladder technique or Delphi method. The goal is to avoid bias toward shared information and predictable surprises.
2- Identify alternative courses of action 3- Evaluate alternative course of action vs. objectives 4- Decide 5- Implement and monitor the decision Identify objectives
Reducing the Bias in Favor of Shared Information: What
Works, What Doesn’t, What Makes Things Worse Framing the task as a “problem to be solved,” implying that it has a “correct” answer. Publicly assigning roles to different group members the responsibility to supply information on a particular decision- relevant topic. Extending the time for discussion, which results in the use of more unshared information. Increasing the number of options from which the group can choose, and explicitly listing those options. Providing an objective source of verification of unshared information. (Objectively and authoritatively shared information gets treated the same as originally shared information, suggesting that sharedness is often used as a proxy for reliability . Finally, as we will discuss, using “nominal” groups, through methods like the “stepladder” or Delphi techniques, can help reduce the bias toward shared information improving group decision making Preventing Groupthink Preventing Premature Convergence: Devil’s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry The Stepladder Technique Generating and Evaluating Alternatives with Nominal Groups: The Delphi Technique avoiding “predictable surprises” Reference paul, brest& linda ,h, Krieger (2010). problem solving, decision making, and professional judgment Oxford University Press USA