Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anthelmintic Activity of Praziquantel On PDF
Anthelmintic Activity of Praziquantel On PDF
Parasitnlngy
Research
9 Springer-Verlag 1989
where a is the mean n u m b e r of worms in a control group and as previously observed with a variety of cestodes
b, the mean n u m b e r in the respective treated birds. in other animal species and man (Roberson 1982).
The 5% parasite survival in birds treated at
2.5 mg/kg is in fact accounted for by the recovery
Results and discussion
of three worms from a single bird. However, the
The results show that praziquantel given orally growth of these worms, as indicated by biomass
completely eliminates immature R. tetragona at figures (Table 2), was retarded. A single worm sur-
any of three doses (10, 7.5, and 5 mg/kg body wt.; vived treatment at 5 mg/kg (Table 2); it weighed
Table 1), leaving no remnant scolices from which just 1 rag, whereas its analogous (31-day-old) con-
strobilae might regenerate. The compound was trols reached a weight of 23 rag. This finding sug-
found to be 100%, 97.1%, and 95% efficacious gests an almost complete suppression of parasite
when tested against mature worms at 10, 5, and growth. Such an adverse effect of praziquantel on
2.5 mg/kg, respectively (Table 2). In this respect, residual worms, by repression of the normal pro-
the drug seems to be a highly active anthelmintic, cess of strobilization and development in the tape-
worm, may be regarded as advantageous in pre-
venting the propagation of infection to the inter-
Table 1. Activity of praziquantel against immature R. tetragona mediate host.
In addition to its potent anticestodal activity,
Trial Bird N u m b e r Total Drug Worms Effi- praziquantel appears to be well tolerated by chick-
num- group of larvae dose/kg" recov- cacy
bet birds given (mg) ered b (%)
ens. Treated birds showed no clinical reaction at
any of the doses tested.
1 T 4 80 10 0 100
C 4 80 - 52 - Acknowledgements. We wish to t h a n k Dr. M. Awad-Elkarim,
May & Baker (Sudan), for the free supply of praziquantel
2 T 3 45 7.5 0 100
(Droncit), which he obtained directly from M/S Bayer.
C 3 45 - 13 -
3 T 6 48 7.5 0 100
C 8 64 - 33 - References
4 T 10 200 5 0 100
Baldock FC, Flucke WJ, Hopkins TJ (1977) Efficacy of prazi-
C 8 160 - 108 -
quantel, a new cesticide, against Taenia hydatigena in the
dog. Res Vet Sci 23:237-238
a Given on day 7 of infection
b T vs C, P < 0 . 0 0 1 in all comparisons. Necropsy on day 14 Bylund G, Bang B, Wikgren K (1977) Tests with a new com-
pound (praziquantel) against Diphyllobothrium latum. J Hel-
of infection
minthol 51 : 11 ~ 1 1 9
T, treated birds; C, untreated controls
Elowni EE (1984) The significance of cestode infections in
chickens. Sudan J Vet Sci Anim Husb 24:133-135
Moskey HE, Harwood PD (1941) Methods of evaluating the
Table 2. Activity of praziquantel against mature R. tetragona
efficacy of anthelmintics. A m J Vet Res 2:55-59
Roberson EL (1982) Anticestodal and antitrematodal drugs.
Trial Bird Num- Total Drug Worms M e a n Effi-
In: Booth NH, M c D o n a l d LE (eds) Veterinary pharmaco-
num- group ber of larvae dose/ recov- worm cacy
logy and therapeutics, 5th edn. Iowa State University Press,
her birds given kg a ered b biomass (%)
Ames, pp 852-873
(mg) (mg dry Siegel S (1956) Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral
wt.) sciences. McGraw-Hilt, New York, pp 104~110
Thakur AS, Prezioso U, Marchevsky N (1978) Efficacy of
1 T 5 100 10 0 0 100 Droncit against Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs.
T 4 80 5 1 1 97.1
A m J Vet Res 39 : 859-860
C 4 80 - 34 23 -
Thomas H, G6nnert R (1977) The efficacy of praziquantel
2 T 5 100 2.5 3 17 95 against cestodes in animals. Z Parasitenkd 52:117-127
C 6 120 - 76 22.3 - Thomas H, G 6 n n e r t R (1978) The efficacy of praziquantel
against cestodes in cats, dogs and sheep. Res Vet Sci
" Given on day 17 of infection 24: 20-25
b T vs C, P < 0 . 0 0 1 in all comparisons. Necropsy on day 31
of infection
T, treated birds; C, untreated controls Accepted March 1, 1989