Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WT1 Sark
WT1 Sark
WT1 Sark
Theory:
About Table:
This table describes the details about the website analysis. For the particular website we have
taken 4 columns i.e purpose of website, things liked in the website, things which are not liked
in the website and the last one is overall evaluation of the website.
Sr. Website Purpose of Things liked Things disliked in Overall evaluation of
No URL Websites in the website the website the website
(Good/Bad)
3. Website
allows to see
the followers
on each
platform and
also
combined
3. https://chat. 1. This 1. one of the 1. this website is Good
openai.com/ website is feature like the having less This website is good
chat used for most is it user interface because of it makes
solving the generates the sometimes life faster.
complex code when we difficult to manage
problems. give things.
instructions
2.This how to code. 2. It searches only
website Is on text based.
also used for 2. This is AI
automatic generated tool 3. When the use
task so, it generated load is very
completion. things very high then it do not
clearly and respond very well.
3.This conceptual.
website is
search based 3.This
on the data generates code
available in such way
after 2020. the developer
need not
worry about
the mistakes.
4. https:// 1. Allow users 1. Color 1. Font size is too Good
www.codec to participate combination is small. Overall it is a good
hef.com/ in online nice. website with minimal
coding 2. Website is design. The website is
competitions. 2. Proper not too having a good Color
alignment is attractive. combination with
2. On the given. proper alignment with
website, the 3. The website is good responsiveness
user can see 3. Website is not beginner
detailed responsive. friendly.
schedule of
upcoming
coding
contests.
3. Website
allows the
user to see
other users
rating.
5. https://githu 1.To show 1. Added all 1. The website Good
b.com my skills, projects demo is little bit not Overall the website is
projects, and in the projects responsive. good with good user
everything with the github interface and only
about me at links. 2. Some of the lacks responsiveness
single place data is not added
in github 2.It is very in the website .
Repository easy to open
anywhere no 3. Not very
2.User can need to carry comfortable to
store his all Resume. open in the mobile
projects and because the
related 3.User componenets.
documentatio Interface of the
n website is very
attractive
3.Used can
remotely
access the
data from any
where.
Conclusion:
Analyzed all the mentioned websites in terms of User Interface, components used in the
website, responsiveness and Overall Website is analyzed .