This document contains 4 bonus tasks related to well log analysis and interpretation:
1. Calculate water saturation using the Humble formation factor formula with an n of 2.
2. Analyze a well log to identify shale baseline, zone the log into three units, and answer questions about mud filtrate salinity, porosity, hydrocarbon indicators, and expected permeability.
3. Determine lithology in four intervals using crossplots and evaluate if the Pe curve supports the analysis. Suggest solutions if any ambiguity is seen.
4. Determine water resistivity at two depths using two methods, note any discrepancies, and discuss how separation between EPT and total porosity curves enhances log suite understanding.
This document contains 4 bonus tasks related to well log analysis and interpretation:
1. Calculate water saturation using the Humble formation factor formula with an n of 2.
2. Analyze a well log to identify shale baseline, zone the log into three units, and answer questions about mud filtrate salinity, porosity, hydrocarbon indicators, and expected permeability.
3. Determine lithology in four intervals using crossplots and evaluate if the Pe curve supports the analysis. Suggest solutions if any ambiguity is seen.
4. Determine water resistivity at two depths using two methods, note any discrepancies, and discuss how separation between EPT and total porosity curves enhances log suite understanding.
This document contains 4 bonus tasks related to well log analysis and interpretation:
1. Calculate water saturation using the Humble formation factor formula with an n of 2.
2. Analyze a well log to identify shale baseline, zone the log into three units, and answer questions about mud filtrate salinity, porosity, hydrocarbon indicators, and expected permeability.
3. Determine lithology in four intervals using crossplots and evaluate if the Pe curve supports the analysis. Suggest solutions if any ambiguity is seen.
4. Determine water resistivity at two depths using two methods, note any discrepancies, and discuss how separation between EPT and total porosity curves enhances log suite understanding.
This document contains 4 bonus tasks related to well log analysis and interpretation:
1. Calculate water saturation using the Humble formation factor formula with an n of 2.
2. Analyze a well log to identify shale baseline, zone the log into three units, and answer questions about mud filtrate salinity, porosity, hydrocarbon indicators, and expected permeability.
3. Determine lithology in four intervals using crossplots and evaluate if the Pe curve supports the analysis. Suggest solutions if any ambiguity is seen.
4. Determine water resistivity at two depths using two methods, note any discrepancies, and discuss how separation between EPT and total porosity curves enhances log suite understanding.
1. Calculate Sw usnig Humble Formaton factor formula with n=2
Problem 2. In the log example given below, indicate the shale baseline and zone the log into three major units: label the shale and the two reservoir units. Assuming that the lower reservoir is water filled, answer the following questions; (a) Is the mud filtrate more or less saline than the formation water? (b)Is the average porosity of the upper reservoir greater or less than that of the lower reservoir? (c) Is the upper reservoir, which curve(s) indicate(s) why the neutron porosity is greater than the density porosity? (d) On the basis of resistivity curve alone, the upper reservoir may be split into two portions. Do they both contain hydrocarbon? Why? (e) Which of the two zones do you expect to be more permeable? Problem 3 The hole size is 8.5 inches and the mud is water based. The zones of interest are from 6410 – 6510 feet. The formation temperature at 6500 ft is 1850F. Mud properties are Rmf = 0.36 ohm.m @ 750F Rmc = 0.40 ohm.m @ 750F 2. Determine the lithology within the intervals 6390-6400; 6432- 6440; 6460-6470 and 6490- 6500 feet by plotting a data point per interval on both a Neutron-Density cross-plot and a M & N plot. Does the Pe curve back up your analysis? If any ambiguity is seen, suggest potential causes and at least one solution. 3. Determine the appropriate Rw at both 6396 and 6500 feet using the SP and Rwa methods. Highlight any possible causes of discrepencies if you observe them. 4. Briefly discuss why the EPT porosity data show distinct separation from the computed total porosity curve. Do these separation enhance your understanding of this log suite