Title of Your Project

Your Name (ID)*, Your Name (ID)*, …….. and Your Name (ID)*
Course Code: CSE 4132 Course Title: Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems Sessional
Semester: Winter 2023
*Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh Army University of Science and Technology
(BAUST)

Abstract
A concise summary of your work. Font size 12; Font Family: Times New Roman; italic.
Please follow a standard research paper’s writing style throughout the report.

1. Introduction
General introduction to your work. Typically contains background of your work. You
must follow the given format throughout this report. For citation of any reference use
following format [1].

2. Literature Review
A short Description about previous works in this area.

3. Dataset Description
A short description of the dataset with sample images and a table that summarizes the
dataset. The figures and tables must be center aligned. The caption of the figure must be
at the bottom of the figure. In case of table caption must be on the top.

4. Methodology
Describe your working methodology with proper flowcharts and figures.

5. Result and Analysis

Describe your experimental setup, procedure and result in detail with proper diagrams.
Write an analysis of your result and provide a comparative analysis with proper charts
and tables.
 6. Stakeholders
List the Stakeholders of your work.

7. Issues Encountered
List the infrequent issues you have faced during your work and explain how you solve
the issues.

8. Conclusion, Limitations and Future Recommendations

Write a proper conclusion with the limitations and the future recommendations of your
work.

References
[1] Harry Thornburg. 2001. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. (March 2001). Retrieved March 2, 2005
from http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/bayes/bayes.html
[2] Sten Andler. 1979. Predicate path expressions. In Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN
Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages (POPL '79), January 29 - 31, 1979, San Antonio,
Texas. ACM Inc., New York, NY, 226-236. https://doi.org/10.1145/567752.567774
[3] Sarah Cohen, Werner Nutt, and Yehoshua Sagic. 2007. Deciding equivalences among conjunctive
aggregate queries. J. ACM 54, 2, Article 5 (April 2007), 50 pages. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1145/1219092.1219093

Appendix
Attainment of Complex Engineering Problem (CP)

S.L CP No. Attainment Remarks

.
1. P1: Depth of K3 (Engineering Fundamentals):
Knowledge Required K4 (Engineering Specialization):

K5 (Design):

K6 (Technology):

K8 (Research):
2. P2: Range of
Conflicting
 Requirements
3. P3: Depth of Analysis
Required
4. P4: Familiarity of
Issues
5. P5: Extent of
Applicable Codes
6. P6: Extent of
Stakeholder
Involvement and
Conflicting
Requirements
7. P7: Interdependence

Mapping of Complex Engineering Activities (CA)

S.L. CA No. Attainment Remarks

1. A1: Range of
resources
2. A2: Level of
interaction
3. A3: Innovation
4. A4: Consequences for
Society and the
Environment
5. A5: Familiarity