Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stylistics
Stylistics
First paragraph
with ‘the study of style in language’ (Verdonk, 2014,). The common meaning of style in everyday
usage is understood as a
in a specific manner. However, in stylistics, we are not just concerned with what
makes the style as distinct, but also why it is distinct, what purpose it is made to
fulfil, and what effect it can have on the listeners or readers. With this
The word style originates from the Latin word stilus, which means
knowledge, activities and realia. The proof of it lies in its extremely wide
combinability: the style of speech, the style of a writer, newspaper style, the
style of a textbook, folk style, classical style, empire style, baroque style,
modern style, sublime style, the style of clothing, leadership style, etc. This
available to a user, beyond the ones needed for a meaning expression. Style
has been approached from various angles by different scholars. Owing to its
complexity and scope, some of them resort to the definition of distinct
and distinguishes four types of stylistics: stylistics of language or descriptive stylistics, functional
stylistics, stylistics of individual speech and
Second paragraph
Taken together, all these arguments demonstrate that style is central to the study of
stylistics. The word style refers to the choice of words/expressions in a given context by a
given person, for a given purpose, and so on. Thus, studies in style have shown that style
is “the selection and arrangement of linguistic features which are open to choice” (De
Vito, 1967), Often times, the author’s identity is given away by some details reflecting,
habit of expression or thought, and these seem to confirm that each writer has a linguistic
herself is an offshoot of his or her personality. Crystal and Davy (1983) opine that style is
communicative contexts. Stylistics therefore is the study of style. But style itself, by its
Since its emergence as a significant academic field within the scope of linguistics in the
1960s, stylistics has continued to attract intellectual attention of varying degrees. Several
meanings and theories of stylistics exist in linguistic scholarship (Crystal and Davy,
1969, Fowler, 1975 and Wales, 2001 etc.). While some see stylistics as a branch of
linguistics that deals with the study of varieties of language, its properties, principles
behind choice, dialogue, accent, length and register (Bradford, 1979 and Downes, 1998),
others insist that it attempts to establish principles capable of explaining the particular
[style] choices used by individuals and social groups in their use of language (Turner,
1973, Birch, 1995 and Fowler, 1998 etc.) Stylistics is not only closely connected with other
branches of linguistics,
Third paragraph
There are several views and perspectives towards stylistics as provided by various
‘linguistic orientation’ to literary discourse (p. 3), while in Toolan’s (2013, p. viii)
view it is the ‘study of the language in literature’. This view of the approach makes
use of linguistic analysis to serve literary traditions. The author of a literary work
create a particular artistic effect on the readers. This can be done by the choice of
certain ‘forms’ and ‘structures’ over the others which may stand out from the rest.
For example, certain sounds or stress patterns in a poem may be preferred over the
others to create the intended effect. Similarly, certain grammatical patterns such as
phrase structures can be preferred to have a particular effect. In this manner, the
readers and critics may be able to recognize what has been used to create their
interest or affect their emotions and what has been left out. The deviation from the
commonly used forms is one way of achieving that particular artistic effect that
may interest those who study style. The literary critic may use stylistics to study
those markers of style that are adopted by an author for a particular impact on the
readers.
Literature is primarily the product of language. It can have varying purposes such
reformations and so on. This can be achieved through various forms and structures
or in other words genres. So, literary authors may be interested in writing drama,
novel or poetry. In addition, these are works of imagination, which may have ‘a
quality beyond the use of words to convey referential meaning’ (Chapman, 1973, p. 3). This use
of language would be somehow less than and loosely distinct from
These definitional perspectives might be helpful in providing some insights into the
makes use of theoretical and methodological depth of linguistics for describing the
patterns of language use in literary texts crafted to achieve specific artistic effects. Texts and
their functions
can explain the principles underlying the choices made by the writer/author of the text. As
explained earlier, the goal of stylistic analysis is to study the style of a text,
style of an author through which the writer stands out and is known for that
peculiar style. Writers may possess or adopt a unique style that may reflect
2. It can be used to highlight the choices made by an author to make a text stand
through some drastic deviations from the norms of language and genre. The
deviations can be studied by making comparisons with commonly used genre
conventions and language varieties to see how an author makes his/her work
noticeable. 3. The style could also be analyzed to point to the times to which a text belongs
and can be used to highlight certain characteristics peculiar to that time such
as the Victorian era or style of Old English. This type of analysis accounts for
language use, this type of analysis focuses more on the effectiveness of the
language used. It aims to analyze how well a text fulfils its intended purpose
effect of a text. The texts that we frequently encounter in our everyday lives include
can recognize texts is their text type or genre. The uses of language for some
recurrence of certain features over a period of time, thus determining their genre
and having a specific ‘style’. This requires the use of certain features of language
more than others within the texts formulated for these purposes. It is easier for us, and is part
of our everyday knowledge, to understand the purpose of a genre due toits recognizable social
function(s). Social events fulfill social purposes. The events
may make use of language and may have a distinct structure. For example, the
purpose of a newspaper story is to inform the readers about some significant event,
or a menu is to make the customer buy food out of the available variety of options.
and use of such features may vary with a particular context and situation.
Probably one of the significant developments in the field is a movement from strict
adherence to the analysis of literary texts to all types of texts for stylistic analysis.
Not all texts requiring linguistic analysis may have significance due totheir literary
effects. Some texts may require some systematic way to study style to meet more
practical or ideological concerns. For example, some texts may be well known forcreating a
persuasive impact on its audience or for propagating certain ideologies
to control their audience. Therefore, both literary, as well as non-literary texts, can
be used for stylistic analysis (Jeffries and McIntyre, 2010). Depending upon the
focus of analysis, the term literary stylistics is used for the analysis of literary texts
whereas linguistic stylistics is used for the analysis of non-literary texts (Jeffries
and McIntyre, 2010). Other than the focus on the kind of texts, the difference also
lies in the way analysis is approached. While the term linguistic stylistics is used
distinctively to interpret a literary text in the light of linguistic techniques, the goals
of linguistic stylistics, however, are also aimed towards some contribution to the
linguistic theory or linguistic model used. Most of the approaches are focused on a
combination of these goals. This book also takes this approach towards the analysis
of texts, where both the literary and non-literary texts are considered as worthy of
stylistic analysis.
understandably so, since the majority of stylistic attention so far has been
ful tools and methods which allow its practitioners to conduct informed
together linguistics and literary studies. Yet, the eclectic claims of the field
phy, cultural theory, sociology, history and psychology to find their way into
the stylistic analyses of literature. While sometimes criticized for its interdis-