Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PG 2020.02.27 Global-Democracy REPORT PDF
PG 2020.02.27 Global-Democracy REPORT PDF
Democratic Rights
Popular Globally but
Commitment to Them
Not Always Strong
Most say elected officials are out of touch
BY Richard Wike and Shannon Schumacher
202.419.4372
www.pewresearch.org
RECOMMENDED CITATION
Pew Research Center, February, 2020, “Democratic
Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them
Not Always Strong”
Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes
and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts
public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social
science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and
technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social
and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew
Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder.
www.pewresearch.org
2
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
For this report, we used data from a survey conducted across 34 countries from May 13 to Oct. 2,
2019, totaling 38,426 respondents. The surveys were conducted face-to-face across Africa, Latin
America and the Middle East, and on the phone in United States and Canada. In the Asia-Pacific
region, face-to-face surveys were conducted in India, Indonesia and the Philippines, while phone
surveys were administered in Australia, Japan and South Korea. Across Europe, the survey was
conducted over the phone in France, Germany, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the UK, but
face-to-face in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Russia,
Slovakia and Ukraine.
Here are the questions used for the report, along with responses, and the survey methodology.
www.pewresearch.org
3
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Table of Contents
Overview: Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not Always Strong 3
Many are frustrated with how democracy is functioning 7
Differing attitudes toward democratic rights and institutions 9
1. Attitudes toward democratic rights and institutions 11
Regular and competitive elections 12
Attitudes toward free expression 13
Gender equality and religious freedom 15
Free operation of human rights organizations and opposition parties 18
2. Attitudes toward elected officials, voting and the state 19
3. Satisfaction with democracy 23
Negative economic views linked to dissatisfaction 25
Frustration with political elites tied to dissatisfaction 27
Appendix: Classifying European political parties 28
Acknowledgments 31
Methodology 32
About Pew Research Center’s Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey 32
Topline questionnaire 33
www.pewresearch.org
4
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Regular
As previous Pew Research elections
65
Center studies have shown,
people who are dissatisfied Free speech 64
with how democracy is
functioning are often less Press freedom 64
committed to representative
democracy, and one important Freedom on
the internet 59
driver of dissatisfaction with
democracy is frustration with Human rights
political elites. In the current groups can 55
operate freely
survey, a median of 64%
Opposition
across the countries polled parties can 54
operate freely
believe elected officials do not
care what people like them Note: Percentages are medians based on 34 countries.
Source: Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey. Q55a-f, Q57a-c.
think. And, in nearly every “Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not Always Strong”
nation surveyed, those who PEW RESEARCH CENTER
think politicians don’t care
about average citizens are
more likely to be dissatisfied with the way democracy is functioning in their country.
www.pewresearch.org
5
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Overwhelming majorities say the democratic principles tested on the survey are at least somewhat
important. However, a stronger measure of commitment to democracy is the share of people who
say it is very important to have these things in their country. Often, underwhelming percentages
describe democratic rights and institutions as very important.
The survey highlights important differences among nations regarding democratic attitudes.
Despite recent concerns about the health of democracy in the United States, Europe and Latin
America, respondents from these places are often more likely than those from other regions to
voice strong support for democratic principles. The largest shares of the public describing all nine
rights and institutions tested as very important
are in the U.S. and Hungary; still, only a third
in these countries (33%) consider all nine very
Support for freedom of speech up in
several nations since 2015
important. In eight nations, the share of the
% who say it is very important that people can say what
public expressing this view is in the single
they want without government censorship in their
digits. country
’15-’19
2015 2019 Change
Around the globe people make distinctions
% %
between the various principles tested – while a Turkey 43 65 ▲22
median of 82% across 34 nations say it is very France 67 83 ▲16
important to live in a country where the judicial Hungary 74* 87 ▲13
system treats everyone the same, fewer say the UK 57 68 ▲11
same about having a political system that Australia 52 63 ▲11
allows human rights organizations or Argentina 77 87 ▲10
Mexico 65 73 ▲8
opposition parties to operate freely.
Indonesia 29 37 ▲8
U.S. 71 77 ▲6
Philippines 50 56 ▲6
Israel 58 51 ▼7
India 44 32 ▼12
* Question in Hungary asked in 2016.
Note: Only statistically significant differences shown.
Source: Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey. Q55d.
“Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not
Always Strong”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
6
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
These are among the major findings from a Pew PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Research Center survey conducted among
38,426 people in 34 countries from May 13 to Oct. 2, 2019.
www.pewresearch.org
7
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
One way in which people are unhappy with the way democracy works is that they see political
elites as out of touch. Across the nations surveyed, a median of 64% disagree with the statement
“Most elected officials care what people like me think.” This opinion is particularly widespread in
Europe – a median of 69% express this view. Further, 71% share this view in the U.S. In contrast,
fewer say this in the three Asian emerging economies included in the study: India (31%), the
Philippines (29%) and Indonesia (18%).
Globally, many are dissatisfied with the way democracy works and frustrated with
elected officials but still value voting
www.pewresearch.org
8
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
When asked whether the state is run for benefit of all the people, global publics are almost evenly
divided: A median of 49% say yes, while 50% say no. But there are large differences across
countries. For instance, 88% in Slovakia believe the state is run for the benefit of all, but just 19%
hold this view in Greece. Overall, the share of the public saying the state is run to benefit everyone
in society has declined in many nations since the Pew Research Center asked the question in 2002.
Three nations – Japan, the Czech Republic and Slovakia – have seen an increase in the share who
say the state is run for the benefit of all since 2002.
In some countries, fewer now think the state is run for the benefit of all
% who agree the state is run for the benefit of all the people
Despite the frustration many people feel about political leaders and the way their political systems
are working, they have not given up on democracy, and most still believe they can have a voice in
the process. A median of 67% agree that voting gives ordinary people some say about how the
government runs things.
www.pewresearch.org
9
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Freedom of religion also garners a great deal of support. Across the nations polled, a median of
68% consider it very important, and it is the top priority in all three sub-Saharan African nations
in the study as well as in Turkey, Indonesia and India. However, it is the lowest priority in several
more secular nations, especially in Europe, where the French, Swedes, Spanish and Dutch all rate
it their lowest priority. The same is true in Japan, South Korea and Canada.
Holding regular elections with at least two political parties is considered very important by a
median of 65% across the nations polled, and more than half hold this view in every nation
surveyed except Russia.
There is general support for the three forms of free expression tested on the survey – free speech,
freedom of the press and freedom on the internet – although the strength of that support varies
cross-nationally. Freedom of speech is the second-highest priority in seven countries, although the
share of the public rating it very important dips below 50% in Tunisia, India, Indonesia, Lebanon,
Kenya and Russia. Roughly half or fewer say this about press freedom in eight nations. Internet
freedom receives somewhat lower support overall (a median of 59% consider it very important),
and in seven countries the share rating it very important is below 50%.
While freedom of expression is mostly endorsed by publics around the world, it is also worth
noting that previous Pew Research Center studies have shown that how people define free
expression can vary substantially across nations. A 38-nation 2015 survey found that, even among
those who value free expression, there are widely different views about the types of speech
governments should allow.
Having a system where civil society organizations such as human rights groups can operate freely
(a median of 55% say it is very important) and having freely operating opposition parties (54%)
are the two lowest-rated principles.
www.pewresearch.org
10
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
* 20% or more of respondents in these countries did not answer the question.
Source: Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey. Q55a-f & Q57a-c.
“Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not Always Strong”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
11
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
1. Attitudes toward
democratic rights and Fair judiciary seen as crucial to most
international publics
institutions % who say it is very important to have a judicial system
that treats everyone the same way in their country
When it comes to institutional factors
important to democracy, having a judicial U.S. 93%
system that treats everyone fairly was the value Canada 91
Lebanon 92
Israel 86
Turkey 82
Tunisia 80
Nigeria 69
South Africa 69
Kenya 64
Argentina 90
Brazil 81
Mexico 71
34-COUNTRY
MEDIAN 82
MEDIAN
Source: Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey. Q57a.
“Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not
Always Strong”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
12
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Nigeria 57
Kenya 56
South Africa 54
Argentina 86
Brazil 64
Mexico 62
34-COUNTRY 65
MEDIAN
Source: Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey. Q55e.
“Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not
Always Strong”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
13
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
14
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
although, there is variation across countries; only 32% say this in India and Tunisia compared with
87% in Greece, Hungary and Argentina.
Support for freedom of the press also varies around the world. While more than half in most
countries say that a free press is very important, support is weaker in countries like Lebanon
(28%) and Tunisia (33%) as well as most of the Asian-Pacific countries surveyed.
Freedom of speech on the internet ranks the lowest among the three items related to censorship.
In most of the countries surveyed, large majorities say that they see internet freedom as at least
somewhat important. Yet, when it comes to what is very important in their country, only in the
Netherlands does internet freedom rank as the most important censorship issue for the public.
Internet users are much more likely than non-users to say it is very important that people can use
the internet without censorship. For example, in the Czech Republic, only 31% of internet non-
users say internet freedom is very important, compared with 75% of users.
In an era of increasing concern about misinformation, the share of people who say it is very
important to have internet freedom, free speech and freedom of the press has risen in a number of
countries around the world, most significantly in France (+16 percentage points or more on all
three items), the UK (+11 or more), Indonesia and Argentina (both +8 or more).
In the countries for which trends and a measure of ideology are available, changes in the number
of people who believe these measures of freedom of expression are very important often cuts
across ideology. That is, all ideological groups are trending in the same direction in their views on
free speech, free press and free internet. For example, in France, the percentage of people saying
freedom of the press is very important grew from 46% in 2015 to 65% in 2019, including double-
digit increases among all ideological groups: the left (+14 points), the center (+19) and the right
(+24).
In the U.S., however, the increase occurred mostly among Democrats and Democratic-leaning
independents, rising from 64% to 85%. Among Republicans and Republican-leaning
independents, it remained largely unchanged (72% to 77%).
The increase on all three measures of support for free expression in Turkey has taken place
disproportionately among those with a negative view of Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s
Justice and Development Party (AKP), though those who favor AKP saw modest increases in the
share that view free speech and press as very important. The growth in support of free expression
among Argentines has been driven by people in the political center.
www.pewresearch.org
15
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Gender equality and Most see gender equality as crucial for their country
religious freedom
% who say it is very important that __ in their country
In every country surveyed, Women have the same People can practice their
rights as men religion freely
strong majorities say gender Canada 93% 65%
equality is very important with U.S. 91 86
notable exceptions in Russia, Sweden 96 53
Tunisia, Kenya and Nigeria. UK 92 75
Netherlands 92 58
Germany 90 72
Women having the same rights France 90 52
Greece 85 83
as men is one of the most Hungary 85 70
widely supported values among Spain 84 54
Italy 74 61
both men and women across Bulgaria 73 58
most of the countries surveyed. Czech Rep. 70 47
Poland 69 56
In some countries, mostly in Slovakia 67 52
Central and Eastern Europe, Lithuania 62 48
MEDIAN 85 57
the Middle East and North
Africa and sub-Saharan Africa, Ukraine 57 59
Russia 54 42
gender equality is seen as more
important among women than Australia 91 60
Philippines 80 74
men. India 72 78
Japan 63 18
Indonesia 61 79
The percentage of people South Korea 56 45
saying gender equality is very MEDIAN 68 67
www.pewresearch.org
16
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Higher support for freedom of religion In many countries, women more likely
among those who say religion than men to value gender equality
personally important % who say it is very important that women have the
% who say it is very important that people can practice same rights as men in their country
their religion freely in their country
www.pewresearch.org
17
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Across the nations polled, a median of 68% say it is very important for people to be able to practice
their religion freely, with especially strong support in the Middle East and Africa as well as in the
U.S., Greece, Indonesia and India. Support is lowest in Japan (18% very important) and Russia
(42%).
Public support for freedom of religion was largely stable from 2015/2016 to 2019, with increases in
three nations and declines in four of 25 countries surveyed in both time periods. Increases in
support were seen most
notably among people in Europeans who favor right-wing populist parties are
Turkey (+25) and the UK (+7), generally less supportive of religious freedom
while larger declines were seen % who say it is very important that people can practice their religion freely
among publics in Mexico (-12), in their country
Italy (-14) and Russia (-18).
www.pewresearch.org
18
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
19
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
20
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
21
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
In some countries, fewer now think the state is run for the benefit of all
% who agree the state is run for the benefit of all the people
In 11 of 20 countries where this question was asked in 2002 and 2019, the share of the public
saying the state is run for the benefit of all has declined significantly. In 2002, for instance, 88% of
Italians held this view, compared with just 30% today.
www.pewresearch.org
22
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Despite the frustrations most have with Most believe voting gives them a say
politicians, and the belief many hold that the % who __ voting gives people like them some say about
state is run in an unfair manner, people still feel how the government runs things
they have a political voice. Across the nations Disagree Agree
polled, a median of 67% agree that voting gives Canada 23% 76%
U.S. 23 74
ordinary people some say about how the
government runs things. Spain 19 80
Sweden 19 80
Slovakia 23 75
Strong majorities in most nations hold this view, Czech Rep. 24 73
Poland 26 71
including 74% in the U.S. In Spain, Sweden, the France 31 67
Philippines and South Korea, eight-in-ten or Greece 33 67
Netherlands 33 67
more express this opinion. Germany 36 62
Italy 36 62
Bulgaria 33 62
Still, substantial shares of the public do not UK 37 61
believe their vote matters in many places, Lithuania 33 61
Hungary 46 51
including 55% in Japan and nearly half in MEDIAN 33 67
Tunisia, Lebanon, Hungary and Nigeria. In most
Ukraine 21 74
nations, the belief that one’s vote does not have Russia 42 54
an impact is especially common among those Philippines 12 86
who do not view the governing party favorably. South Korea 17 81
India 15 78
Indonesia 8 75
Australia 26 72
Japan 55 43
MEDIAN 16 77
Turkey 18 78
Israel 27 71
Lebanon 47 51
Tunisia 47 46
South Africa 29 69
Kenya 29 67
Nigeria 45 53
Brazil 38 55
Argentina 40 55
Mexico 42 54
34-COUNTRY
MEDIAN 30 67
MEDIAN
Note: Don’t know responses not shown.
Source: Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey. Q50b.
“Democratic Rights Popular Globally but Commitment to Them Not
Always Strong”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
23
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
India 26 70
Those in the Asia-Pacific region tend to be
Philippines 34 65
satisfied with how democracy is working in Indonesia 37 58
Australia 41 57
their countries, although Japan is an exception.
South Korea 44 55
Japan 53 43
MEDIAN 39 58
Views differ in the Middle East and North
Africa. Most Israelis are satisfied with the way Israel 43 55
Turkey 50 47
democracy is working, but Tunisian and Lebanon 67 33
Lebanese publics are among the most Tunisia 69 27
dissatisfied in the survey. Opinion in Turkey is Kenya 39 59
divided. South Africa 61 38
Nigeria 70 28
www.pewresearch.org
24
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Across the nations polled, supporters of the ruling party are consistently more content about the
functioning of the political system. In 28 of 34 countries, they are more satisfied than others with
the way democracy is working. (In six such countries, those who did not support the governing
party were more likely to not answer the question.)
www.pewresearch.org
25
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
26
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
27
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
28
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Although experts generally agree that populist political leaders or parties display high levels of
anti-elitism, definitions of populism vary. We use three measures to classify populist parties: anti-
elite ratings from the 2017 Chapel Hill Expert Survey (CHES), Inglehart and Norris’s populism
party scale and The PopuList. We define a party as populist when at least two of these three
measures classify it as such.
CHES, which was carried out in January and February 2018, asked 228 regional experts to
evaluate the 2017 positions of 132 European political parties across 14 European Union member
states. CHES results are regularly used by academics to classify parties with regard to their left-
right ideological leanings, their key party platform positions and their degree of populism, among
other things.
We measure anti-elitism using an average of two variables in the CHES data. First, we used
“PEOPLE_VS_ELITE,” which asked the experts to measure the parties with regard to their
position on direct vs. representative democracy, where 0 means that the parties support elected
officeholders making the most important decisions and 10 means that “the people,” not politicians,
should make the most important decisions. Second, we used “ANTIELITE_SALIENCE,” which is a
measure of the salience of anti-establishment and anti-elite rhetoric for that particular party, with
0 meaning not at all salient and 10 meaning extremely salient. The average of these two measures
is shown in the table below as “anti-elitism.” In all countries, we consider parties that score above
a 7.0 as “populist.”
We also used CHES’s “FAMILY” variable to further classify populist groups. Per CHES, family
attribution is based on a combination of “a) membership or affiliation with [European Parliament]
party families, b) Parlgov classifications and c) self-identification.”
Inglehart and Norris emphasize the cultural views of populist parties and created a populist party
scale using the 2014 CHES data for classification. 1 This scale aggregates expert ratings of the party
on the following positions and attitudes: 1) support for traditional social values, 2) opposition to
liberal lifestyles, 3) promotion of nationalism, 4) favorable toward tough law and order, 5)
favorable toward assimilation for immigrants and asylum seekers, 6) support for restrictive
immigration policies, 7) opposition to more rights for ethnic minorities, 8) support for religious
1Inglehart, Ronald F., and Pippa Norris. 2016. “Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-
Nots and Cultural Backlash.” HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series.
www.pewresearch.org
29
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
principles in politics and 9) support for rural interests. The scale ranges from 0 to 100, and parties
with a score of more than 80 are classified as populist.
The PopuList is an ongoing project to classify European political parties as populist, far right, far
left and/or euroskeptic. The project specifically looks at parties that “obtained at least 2% of the
vote in at least one national parliamentary election since 1998.” It is based on collaboration
between academic experts and journalists. The PopuList classifies parties that emphasize the will
of the people against the elite as populist. 2
Two parties are missing data for at least two of the measures used for classification but are still
included for analysis in the report. Vox in Spain is considered a right-wing populist party by
experts, but was not included in any of the measures used due to its relatively recent rise in
popularity. Similarly, Forum for Democracy (FvD) in the Netherlands did not achieve a large
enough share of the votes to be included in the PopuList analysis and was founded in 2016, after
data collection for the Inglehart and Norris analysis. Experts in the most recent round of CHES
classify this party as a right-wing populist party, and its score on the anti-elitism scale exceeds the
cut-off.
www.pewresearch.org
30
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Notes: Golden Dawn (XA) in Greece not included in analysis due to insufficient sample size. Questions about populist parties were not asked
in Bulgaria or Lithuania. Left-right indicates the average score CHES experts gave each party on an 11-point left-right scale. Scores for
anti-elitism are an average of party position on direct vs. representative democracy and the salience of anti-elite rhetoric within the party.
Source: 2017 CHES. Inglehart and Norris (2016). The PopuList (2019).
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
31
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Acknowledgments
This report is a collaborative effort based on the input and analysis of the following individuals.
www.pewresearch.org
32
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Methodology
About Pew Research Center’s Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey
Results for the survey are based on telephone and face-to-face interviews conducted under the
direction of Gallup and Abt Associates. The results are based on national samples, unless
otherwise noted. More details about our international survey methodology and country-specific
sample designs are available here.
www.pewresearch.org
33
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Topline questionnaire
Pew Research Center
Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey
February 27, 2020 Release
Methodological notes:
• Survey results are based on national samples. For further details on sample designs, see
Methodology section and our international survey methods database.
• The following table shows the unweighted sample sizes and the error attributable to
sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the
United States in the survey:
• Due to rounding, percentages may not total 100%. The topline “total” columns show 100%,
because they are based on unrounded numbers.
• Since 2007, Pew Research Center has used an automated process to generate toplines for
its Global Attitudes surveys. As a result, numbers may differ slightly from those published
prior to 2007.
• For some countries, trends for certain years are omitted due to differences in sample
design or population coverage. Omitted trends often reflect less representative samples
than more recent surveys in the same countries. Trends that are omitted include:
• Not all questions included in the Spring 2019 Global Attitudes Survey are presented in this
topline. Omitted questions have either been previously released or will be released in
future reports.
www.pewresearch.org
34
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q5. How satisfied are you with the way democracy is working in our country – very satisfied,
somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied?
Somewhat Not too Not at all
Very satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied DK/Refused Total
United States Spring, 2019 9 30 32 27 2 100
Spring, 2018 11 29 31 27 2 100
Spring, 2017 11 35 28 23 3 100
Canada Spring, 2019 14 52 24 9 1 100
Spring, 2018 16 45 25 14 1 100
Spring, 2017 18 52 21 9 1 100
France Spring, 2019 5 36 29 29 1 100
Spring, 2018 5 43 29 22 1 100
Spring, 2017 3 31 37 28 1 100
Germany Spring, 2019 17 48 21 15 0 100
Spring, 2018 13 43 27 16 1 100
Spring, 2017 24 49 19 7 1 100
Greece Spring, 2019 5 21 41 33 1 100
Spring, 2018 1 15 42 42 1 100
Spring, 2017 3 18 43 36 0 100
Italy Spring, 2019 3 28 41 27 1 100
Spring, 2018 2 27 46 24 1 100
Spring, 2017 2 29 43 24 2 100
Netherlands Spring, 2019 18 50 20 11 0 100
Spring, 2018 12 52 24 10 1 100
Spring, 2017 25 52 16 6 2 100
Spain Spring, 2019 8 24 41 27 1 100
Spring, 2018 7 13 45 36 0 100
Spring, 2017 7 18 44 30 0 100
Sweden Spring, 2019 20 52 19 9 1 100
Spring, 2018 18 51 21 9 0 100
Spring, 2017 23 56 14 6 1 100
United Kingdom Spring, 2019 5 26 32 37 0 100
Spring, 2018 7 35 32 23 2 100
Spring, 2017 12 40 31 16 2 100
Bulgaria Spring, 2019 2 25 42 29 3 100
Fall, 2009 0 21 44 32 3 100
Czech Republic Spring, 2019 8 49 28 11 5 100
Fall, 2009 4 45 37 12 1 100
Hungary Spring, 2019 7 38 26 24 6 100
Spring, 2018 5 40 34 19 2 100
Spring, 2017 3 41 36 17 3 100
Fall, 2009 2 19 46 31 1 100
Lithuania Spring, 2019 9 50 26 10 5 100
Spring, 2011 1 24 43 29 3 100
Fall, 2009 2 33 38 22 5 100
Poland Spring, 2019 15 51 22 9 3 100
Spring, 2018 9 42 31 13 6 100
Spring, 2017 8 43 31 13 6 100
Fall, 2009 6 47 32 7 7 100
Slovakia Spring, 2019 9 43 30 15 2 100
Fall, 2009 6 44 36 10 4 100
Russia Spring, 2019 2 28 40 24 7 100
Spring, 2018 4 40 32 17 8 100
Spring, 2012 5 26 45 18 6 100
Spring, 2011 4 23 37 26 9 100
Fall, 2009 3 29 38 23 7 100
www.pewresearch.org
35
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q5. How satisfied are you with the way democracy is working in our country – very satisfied,
somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied?
Somewhat Not too Not at all
Very satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied DK/Refused Total
Ukraine Spring, 2019 5 29 35 23 8 100
Spring, 2011 1 12 41 40 6 100
Fall, 2009 4 17 38 32 10 100
Australia Spring, 2019 13 44 26 15 2 100
Spring, 2018 13 46 26 14 2 100
Spring, 2017 13 45 25 16 1 100
India Spring, 2019 28 42 12 14 4 100
Spring, 2018 25 29 18 15 13 100
Spring, 2017 33 46 8 3 9 100
Indonesia Spring, 2019 20 38 28 9 5 100
Spring, 2018 19 46 28 5 2 100
Spring, 2017 14 55 26 3 2 100
Japan Spring, 2019 3 40 43 10 3 100
Spring, 2018 2 38 44 12 3 100
Spring, 2017 5 45 38 9 3 100
Philippines Spring, 2019 19 46 30 4 1 100
Spring, 2018 24 45 26 5 1 100
Spring, 2017 21 48 25 6 1 100
South Korea Spring, 2019 8 47 31 13 1 100
Spring, 2018 9 55 29 6 1 100
Spring, 2017 3 27 55 14 1 100
Israel Spring, 2019 15 40 30 13 2 100
Spring, 2018 13 43 31 12 2 100
Spring, 2017 11 41 34 13 1 100
Lebanon Spring, 2019 7 26 32 35 0 100
Spring, 2017 0 8 36 55 0 100
Tunisia Spring, 2019 2 25 25 44 5 100
Spring, 2018 6 21 23 47 3 100
Spring, 2017 7 29 14 47 3 100
Spring, 2013 3 21 30 42 4 100
Turkey Spring, 2019 12 35 20 30 3 100
Kenya Spring, 2019 10 49 21 18 2 100
Spring, 2018 13 39 26 21 1 100
Spring, 2017 17 39 24 19 1 100
Spring, 2013 27 46 19 9 0 100
Spring, 2007 15 57 23 5 1 100
Nigeria Spring, 2019 9 19 34 36 1 100
Spring, 2018 20 19 25 35 1 100
Spring, 2017 20 21 27 31 0 100
Spring, 2013 7 20 42 30 1 100
South Africa Spring, 2019 16 22 28 33 1 100
Spring, 2018 12 23 25 39 1 100
Spring, 2017 15 28 29 27 2 100
Spring, 2013 32 35 19 13 1 100
Argentina Spring, 2019 7 31 33 28 1 100
Spring, 2018 5 30 28 35 2 100
Spring, 2017 9 37 31 23 1 100
Spring, 2013 15 42 29 14 1 100
Brazil Spring, 2019 5 36 27 29 3 100
Spring, 2018 3 13 24 59 1 100
Spring, 2017 3 25 25 42 4 100
Spring, 2013 10 56 25 7 2 100
www.pewresearch.org
36
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q5. How satisfied are you with the way democracy is working in our country – very satisfied,
somewhat satisfied, not too satisfied, or not at all satisfied?
Somewhat Not too Not at all
Very satisfied satisfied satisfied satisfied DK/Refused Total
Mexico Spring, 2019 6 36 37 19 2 100
Spring, 2018 1 13 40 45 1 100
Spring, 2017 2 4 23 70 2 100
Spring, 2013 10 43 31 14 2 100
Q50a. Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or
completely disagree with the following statements. a. Most elected officials care what people
like me think
Completely Mostly Completely
agree Mostly agree disagree disagree DK/Refused Total
United States Spring, 2019 4 23 43 28 3 100
Spring, 1990 7 38 39 14 2 100
Canada Spring, 2019 5 32 45 17 1 100
France Spring, 2019 5 18 33 43 2 100
Fall, 2009 6 25 39 29 0 100
Spring, 1991 6 21 37 33 3 100
Germany Spring, 2019 5 28 39 23 5 100
Fall, 2009 4 33 49 14 1 100
Spring, 1991 6 24 47 16 7 100
Greece Spring, 2019 2 11 38 46 2 100
Italy Spring, 2019 5 24 36 32 3 100
Fall, 2009 5 28 33 30 4 100
Spring, 1991 3 11 35 49 3 100
Netherlands Spring, 2019 8 43 32 16 1 100
Spain Spring, 2019 8 15 37 39 1 100
Fall, 2009 2 26 48 20 3 100
Spring, 1991 7 18 33 34 7 100
Sweden Spring, 2019 9 47 23 19 2 100
United Kingdom Spring, 2019 4 24 42 28 2 100
Fall, 2009 4 35 40 18 3 100
Spring, 1991 3 32 38 23 4 100
Bulgaria Spring, 2019 3 14 32 46 4 100
Fall, 2009 3 11 36 46 3 100
Spring, 1991 5 16 40 25 14 100
Czech Republic Spring, 2019 5 18 40 33 4 100
Fall, 2009 2 16 34 46 2 100
Spring, 1991 6 28 46 18 3 100
Hungary Spring, 2019 4 19 25 46 5 100
Fall, 2009 8 14 31 47 1 100
Spring, 1991 7 25 44 19 5 100
Lithuania Spring, 2019 5 23 29 35 7 100
Fall, 2009 1 14 25 58 2 100
Spring, 1991 4 26 38 27 5 100
Poland Spring, 2019 9 36 30 18 6 100
Fall, 2009 9 28 34 25 5 100
Spring, 1991 6 18 49 20 8 100
Slovakia Spring, 2019 8 27 31 32 2 100
Fall, 2009 2 20 39 34 4 100
Spring, 1991 2 19 51 24 4 100
Russia Spring, 2019 13 23 29 29 7 100
Spring, 2012 4 29 32 28 7 100
Fall, 2009 6 20 36 35 4 100
Spring, 1991 4 14 46 26 10 100
www.pewresearch.org
37
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q50a. Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or
completely disagree with the following statements. a. Most elected officials care what people
like me think
Completely Mostly Completely
agree Mostly agree disagree disagree DK/Refused Total
Ukraine Spring, 2019 3 12 26 54 5 100
Fall, 2009 8 15 28 44 6 100
Spring, 1991 3 19 54 17 7 100
Australia Spring, 2019 4 32 40 23 2 100
India Spring, 2019 30 25 14 17 14 100
Indonesia Spring, 2019 39 28 12 6 15 100
Japan Spring, 2019 5 20 44 29 2 100
Philippines Spring, 2019 30 39 21 8 2 100
South Korea Spring, 2019 4 32 42 20 2 100
Israel Spring, 2019 12 26 33 26 2 100
Lebanon Spring, 2019 6 24 28 38 3 100
Tunisia Spring, 2019 6 11 17 62 3 100
Turkey Spring, 2019 21 34 15 24 6 100
Kenya Spring, 2019 20 19 27 31 3 100
Nigeria Spring, 2019 13 18 19 47 3 100
South Africa Spring, 2019 25 25 19 25 5 100
Argentina Spring, 2019 7 14 33 42 4 100
Brazil Spring, 2019 11 15 20 47 6 100
Mexico Spring, 2019 3 30 51 11 4 100
Q50b. Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or
completely disagree with the following statements. b. Voting gives people like me some say
about how the government runs things
Completely Mostly Completely
agree Mostly agree disagree disagree DK/Refused Total
United States Spring, 2019 27 47 16 7 2 100
Spring, 1990 23 50 18 7 2 100
Canada Spring, 2019 27 49 17 6 1 100
France Spring, 2019 30 37 15 16 1 100
Fall, 2009 32 43 14 11 0 100
Spring, 1991 35 42 13 8 3 100
Germany Spring, 2019 19 43 22 14 2 100
Fall, 2009 13 42 29 13 2 100
Spring, 1991 11 43 28 11 7 100
Greece Spring, 2019 26 41 18 15 0 100
Italy Spring, 2019 24 38 22 14 2 100
Fall, 2009 16 43 26 14 1 100
Spring, 1991 18 31 22 25 4 100
Netherlands Spring, 2019 23 44 20 13 1 100
Spain Spring, 2019 48 32 9 10 2 100
Fall, 2009 16 56 18 8 2 100
Spring, 1991 39 33 11 9 7 100
Sweden Spring, 2019 41 39 10 9 1 100
United Kingdom Spring, 2019 18 43 23 14 1 100
Fall, 2009 13 43 29 13 3 100
Spring, 1991 15 40 27 16 2 100
Bulgaria Spring, 2019 27 35 17 16 5 100
Fall, 2009 23 43 18 12 4 100
Spring, 1991 44 32 8 4 12 100
Czech Republic Spring, 2019 25 48 17 7 4 100
Fall, 2009 17 44 22 15 2 100
Spring, 1991 23 41 22 10 4 100
www.pewresearch.org
38
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q50b. Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or
completely disagree with the following statements. b. Voting gives people like me some say
about how the government runs things
Completely Mostly Completely
agree Mostly agree disagree disagree DK/Refused Total
Hungary Spring, 2019 19 32 21 25 3 100
Fall, 2009 14 24 27 34 1 100
Spring, 1991 17 32 29 15 7 100
Lithuania Spring, 2019 20 41 21 12 6 100
Fall, 2009 10 42 23 21 4 100
Spring, 1991 35 39 13 8 6 100
Poland Spring, 2019 23 48 16 10 3 100
Fall, 2009 11 36 29 20 3 100
Spring, 1991 6 35 36 16 7 100
Slovakia Spring, 2019 26 49 15 8 2 100
Fall, 2009 14 46 25 13 2 100
Spring, 1991 14 32 31 16 7 100
Russia Spring, 2019 23 31 20 22 4 100
Spring, 2012 12 44 23 14 6 100
Fall, 2009 10 34 28 26 3 100
Spring, 1991 13 34 21 22 9 100
Ukraine Spring, 2019 29 45 13 8 5 100
Fall, 2009 15 31 23 27 4 100
Spring, 1991 13 34 35 12 6 100
Australia Spring, 2019 20 52 16 10 2 100
India Spring, 2019 60 18 9 6 7 100
Indonesia Spring, 2019 51 24 5 3 17 100
Japan Spring, 2019 10 33 36 19 2 100
Philippines Spring, 2019 53 33 9 3 2 100
South Korea Spring, 2019 30 51 12 5 2 100
Israel Spring, 2019 22 49 18 9 2 100
Lebanon Spring, 2019 19 32 22 25 3 100
Tunisia Spring, 2019 23 23 16 31 8 100
Turkey Spring, 2019 49 29 9 9 4 100
Kenya Spring, 2019 40 27 15 14 3 100
Nigeria Spring, 2019 30 23 18 27 3 100
South Africa Spring, 2019 44 25 14 15 3 100
Argentina Spring, 2019 28 27 23 17 5 100
Brazil Spring, 2019 27 28 15 23 7 100
Mexico Spring, 2019 6 48 38 4 5 100
www.pewresearch.org
39
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q50e. Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or
completely disagree with the following statements. e. Generally, the state is run for the benefit
of all the people
Completely Mostly Completely
agree Mostly agree disagree disagree DK/Refused Total
United States Spring, 2019 10 36 33 19 2 100
Fall, 2009 11 40 33 14 2 100
Summer, 2002 17 48 25 9 2 100
Spring, 1990 10 42 35 10 3 100
Canada Spring, 2019 13 43 33 11 1 100
Summer, 2002 17 42 26 14 1 100
France Spring, 2019 13 31 26 30 1 100
Fall, 2009 13 33 30 24 0 100
Summer, 2002 7 33 43 17 0 100
Spring, 1991 13 35 33 17 2 100
Germany Spring, 2019 10 38 32 19 1 100
Fall, 2009 5 36 44 14 2 100
Summer, 2002 36 50 11 2 1 100
Spring, 1991 7 35 39 10 10 100
Greece Spring, 2019 3 16 39 42 0 100
Italy Spring, 2019 6 24 41 27 2 100
Fall, 2009 5 28 39 25 4 100
Summer, 2002 41 47 9 2 2 100
Spring, 1991 2 10 34 52 2 100
Netherlands Spring, 2019 19 51 21 9 1 100
Spain Spring, 2019 14 30 28 27 1 100
Fall, 2009 6 45 35 11 2 100
Spring, 1991 19 33 23 18 8 100
Sweden Spring, 2019 24 49 13 12 3 100
United Kingdom Spring, 2019 8 36 33 22 1 100
Fall, 2009 9 43 30 15 3 100
Summer, 2002 16 50 24 9 1 100
Spring, 1991 9 43 30 17 2 100
Bulgaria Spring, 2019 3 21 31 43 2 100
Fall, 2009 3 13 39 44 2 100
Summer, 2002 14 23 34 24 5 100
Spring, 1991 20 35 28 12 6 100
Czech Republic Spring, 2019 39 40 12 7 2 100
Fall, 2009 24 46 22 6 2 100
Summer, 2002 19 37 33 9 2 100
Spring, 1991 28 33 28 9 2 100
Hungary Spring, 2019 34 40 11 8 5 100
Fall, 2009 32 35 17 15 2 100
Spring, 1991 7 27 41 16 10 100
Lithuania Spring, 2019 7 39 29 21 5 100
Fall, 2009 3 20 29 44 4 100
Spring, 1991 12 36 30 15 6 100
Poland Spring, 2019 11 45 24 13 6 100
Fall, 2009 8 32 40 15 4 100
Summer, 2002 48 40 8 1 3 100
Spring, 1991 4 27 43 12 13 100
Slovakia Spring, 2019 48 40 8 3 1 100
Fall, 2009 5 28 40 23 4 100
Summer, 2002 24 30 32 12 1 100
Spring, 1991 33 38 23 3 3 100
www.pewresearch.org
40
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q50e. Please tell me whether you completely agree, mostly agree, mostly disagree or
completely disagree with the following statements. e. Generally, the state is run for the benefit
of all the people
Completely Mostly Completely
agree Mostly agree disagree disagree DK/Refused Total
Russia Spring, 2019 13 25 35 25 2 100
Fall, 2009 7 30 35 23 4 100
Summer, 2002 8 42 37 7 6 100
Spring, 1991 7 20 39 27 7 100
Ukraine Spring, 2019 3 18 30 42 6 100
Fall, 2009 8 12 30 45 5 100
Summer, 2002 8 24 36 31 1 100
Spring, 1991 4 18 47 25 5 100
Australia Spring, 2019 10 42 31 15 2 100
India Spring, 2019 51 20 11 12 6 100
Indonesia Spring, 2019 48 24 8 5 15 100
Japan Spring, 2019 7 35 43 14 2 100
Summer, 2002 4 22 49 23 1 100
Philippines Spring, 2019 45 38 11 4 1 100
Summer, 2002 37 47 13 3 1 100
South Korea Spring, 2019 9 41 36 13 1 100
Summer, 2002 10 39 39 8 3 100
Israel Spring, 2019 14 28 35 21 2 100
Lebanon Spring, 2019 7 19 30 42 1 100
Summer, 2002 48 30 14 7 1 100
Tunisia Spring, 2019 10 11 15 61 3 100
Turkey Spring, 2019 33 33 13 18 3 100
Summer, 2002 59 20 10 6 5 100
Kenya Spring, 2019 36 27 19 16 2 100
Summer, 2002 48 25 15 11 0 100
Nigeria Spring, 2019 29 24 16 30 2 100
South Africa Spring, 2019 38 25 17 17 3 100
Summer, 2002 48 27 12 12 2 100
Argentina Spring, 2019 6 14 37 40 3 100
Summer, 2002 8 9 31 50 3 100
Brazil Spring, 2019 29 22 20 25 5 100
Mexico Spring, 2019 5 39 45 9 3 100
Summer, 2002 13 34 39 12 2 100
In Fall 2009 and 1991, the question asked about the government rather than the state in the U.S. In Spring 2002, the question
asked about 'the (state or government).'
www.pewresearch.org
41
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55a. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? a. people can practice their
religion freely
www.pewresearch.org
42
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55a. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? a. people can practice their
religion freely
Q55b. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? b. the media can report the
news without <state or government> censorship
www.pewresearch.org
43
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55b. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? b. the media can report the
news without <state or government> censorship
Question asked about “state censorship” in the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia, Tunisia, and Ukraine. Questions were asked
about “government/state censorship” in Slovakia. In all other countries, questions asked as “government” censorship.
www.pewresearch.org
44
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55c. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? c. women have the same rights
as men
www.pewresearch.org
45
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55c. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? c. women have the same rights
as men
Q55d. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? d. people can say what they
want without <state or government> censorship
www.pewresearch.org
46
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55d. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? d. people can say what they
want without <state or government> censorship
Question asked about “state censorship” in the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia, Tunisia, and Ukraine. Questions were asked
about “government/state censorship” in Slovakia. In all other countries, questions asked as “government” censorship.
www.pewresearch.org
47
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55e. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? e. honest elections are held
regularly with a choice of at least two political parties
www.pewresearch.org
48
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55e. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? e. honest elections are held
regularly with a choice of at least two political parties
Q55f. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? f. people can use the internet
without <state or government> censorship
www.pewresearch.org
49
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q55f. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? f. people can use the internet
without <state or government> censorship
Question asked about “state censorship” in the Czech Republic, Germany, Russia, Tunisia, and Ukraine. Questions were asked
about “government/state censorship” in Slovakia. In all other countries, questions asked as “government” censorship.
www.pewresearch.org
50
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q57a. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? a. there is a judicial system
that treats everyone in the same way
www.pewresearch.org
51
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q57b. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? b. human rights organizations
are allowed to operate without <state or government> interference
www.pewresearch.org
52
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
Q57c. How important is it to have the following things in our country? Is it very important,
somewhat important, not too important or not important at all? c. opposition parties can
operate freely
www.pewresearch.org