Dp ER ERM KH Ter | AES ed $SUUGEE G BRA (Ulrich BeskyMLA PEN ARS Me PORES SH adJ0 Pierre Bourdieu) 2 2C/ kit GATE + RORLORK: RE RE RSE MEA KKS SERS - ASTER ZA AL ARIEZ P * BR BE ait ERA TA ea SEALANT» PRE ASOeaTS « EE RAAT RR EAL ARAL a A * GRRE: BiG + FAIL LSI + Ba + ike Bey « EEO: EIA MRED Lee eA: CSAS RAL &. PUN SL ee MMA (calan32@mail nstm gov.tw ) © 2014 Crisis Management Society, Taiwan, ROC. Manusetipt received November 11, 2013; accepted February 25, 2014, _ICM140302126PBS 1ae (SHIL GBR AF (Ultich Beckyjs 1986 HEB (EUPREEG@ ) (Risikogesettschatt)—s > @ 5 (RRR i SR ae» BARTZ > (BURT ER ‘iit @ 2 Bic Mi (Anthony Giddens) ~ Lash) ARQILA ERIE MRT © SZ RAGE) (reflexivity) FBP AER (ABT STIR LTIBS RU A AP AE FE tw Jewt4nag2iaseas Pl MLR ARS * AGERE 2 (BUG) HEALS TR: ASE EAR» EZ aE Ai Bie BRUSH - RARER MSS) SSARRASEORKE (boomerang effect) » MHS SME SOS BRR ATL ETL] + BARA RRR» CES HEB Wh BE LRM fat FRUIT | (world risk society)[2, 3] « EVEL DEBT R RET Sit se ets PATHE LE * MLR * SORTER it OR LAS RRS AE LA RAISE ZUR DY BUSH NET ita SINS Sea. 4] - RTT + Ee) MEAT SAE + SYTEER I) ZRERUAB EERADRC ESTE B+ BERETA | (subpolities) 84 35 BCS | (life politics FYE A iL Eh» CE RAWLZ TT + REE) (ERT ERIS (RR ASR LS Ol + RAN + (ER «SMR NS TEL + EUR HIN] FOREARM SOR TR + RESERASLOMBRARE + (BRL B) RSET ES > RIPATR STEVE a UP Sea ER? SE URI ABET + aE RAL RET ASSET Fie EL SRUGILS. 6] AMAR AMET (bit: @ A 79 iB Piere Bourdieu) 2 $5 33% (ficld) - {2 B(habitus) - 2 As(capitalyS : SPR HS TL) ZR + BERSTTAE » DLR REESE THR aR RRC SMITE » urna of Cis Management 2014 Nol tt Not 8788> Wang and Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society": From the Perspective of Bourdon 2 (RSE 2A HEIR BEECH RS CBRE Ee BRL ew | EE B+ BUT URL RRR Le * SERARNVREZEE - ASR | RRA RAE 2 BA | (risk of modcmity) » HAPSAG03% = 1. SAME + a0 BSR MSRAS BBA EA SE RE ASS RS 2 EA lke RUATHERGIRIL » ESF RREE + (ROR Fete TEAR SHERI : BER RAEI ES Cea 4, BEATE RUE + RTE, SRE The GR TBR AAR IRS RLABT BUT] ARERR AES ELA OBIE * BRR Baa * BEC TEE + AEE EF OS RE BIOS Ee KER HAAS RA ESE Al AHR TTR ff > MLRTOU RE ee SAR [9° IER ERR A BT BEBE Re SMO bit SHSHile AR SOAR EAA ‘ETERS » RoC ITS BETTS HH IRSFE/ UE (reflexive modernity) » F487 REET ARBS UR eS» FL REA - BS - REUTER RRS FeO] « RR SELL eR oe PE BRE EG ARGS: 1. A SSCL BRAILLE: RS iit SZTPSAE . BRERA S AE Be FT AR TORE RABE Shs BRI (AR SES SOIL THRESR AZ BRE A EI UREA HURE:S. RARER ESE SEL, eure of Coss Managenent 2014 Ve 1 Ns SRR (i - BERRI TORS FA + REPU ERT SS RT » BES ABP ZIRE « BG RGAE) ZR AL 12|\(Beck, 1996) 5 Al SPREE SEHGR » TRS TiS ACUTE RR TT * A ‘HIRI BERR CSS RR ZA | BU TERPS 7S SRRAGRL FR LASERS + AT EE ASE TSS RGR IPERS FS ALES HE PE» aE (AUS RH (REE) ° BENS + | RSRAE EBSA SE SRN A (self-confrontation) [12] « Te DR RSE TE ZEAE AL BUG SR BA > RRA CET TBR REMARK + BURR ADR RAE ° 2 BR ARYA) MARR a Sealey RUB + WERE MNES BSR + SS eA BREN CER REBEL 2A BRL SPR STRAHL TERT, 7, 1, 12] + LbRTh BRE) ZS EER » FART SB MRE EZ RIL SUSE S IE + CSE REST BRE AMACRILS » SAAR AR HD MPRARGH? MRAE REN AUPE IR? ST RISD A PRS + HAS SS BE Ar PAS A > BELLIS RAAB RRE MINE SRS SAS SQ ASR SORES KRIS AUdispositiony 2+ HS MWRLR ERE - SEER T BAG [IRB EHEmile Durkheim) ze {A(Max Weber) (2) > (RE—BIROSHL AUST hE TERN 3 SRL: BRAC SRYWag aunt Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society”; From the Perspective ot Bourtiew 89 sty ~ (EB (habitus) « 2.2 EAA BEE BUS ASSL AGS 0 BIE ik BA SR ZS TREEER So (BE BARS - RT Ra REL ERLE + 2.21 AEE 2 CALS AMERAAP RSS RERERZ SIL: ARATE» HTL aU RERCEIEZ CAE + HEMT LA a & AMER ALe eS BRAT JEMEZ field)» AF AZ ATED» + Safe ea PER HE A LE A | FLAME FH ZAR (practice) + SCAT SARS > ERR A LRT PALA NS EEE RELY FRR ZI eT RRL] » Bob A Sh S44 LS Saar eS A (capita i528 « AUER ZAR + TH SSAA > FP UFS[IS] + 1. AE AN: NRA EER ES RTA + 2. ERE AR BA RASS STL BOERS B.SC HEAR FAIRS AIRES» RRR AREA AR IS FRLLBLRG > SOP CROR + REEL (ROB ED | 4A : bak ARTA TREE SUER « HALE ER GM RRB * BRE PRP LUTTE» LAR ARIAT MIR + 3 —- ORE PIES» AMSAT AES: SEER E+ i RII PHAR AGH ARERRT RRA i 5 ABR HAA WER AY (EMRE PE ARSE FTI BTL «ETRE - ERS RAZ ARIGLI] - EB AHABE 75 FEEL SS — fB [38 AE PE fA A | (structuring ARENT IE NES structure) » ETERARL REALE » RAPE FERGIE SAL + OAR * RRS PSR S/S RCRLIT) + MENS SRE A (PR ERASE IE logic of practice) EA SEM Za BaF TREE E PES HAAL8] - BMA + AER STATES » Te MATA eY ‘RG MAZE RTRBIE ES RL LAE EI RS BABE TINA» SSA - ath 8: RARE ALIS > 2.2.2 JE 2 ROE EBT AE RSE - (HABA a ARRES ARERR ZR FR) PERT Bee PA I20] ° (BS RECEEAR OHA RRAB LSS ie SATIS FTTE IRC ERR Se (EG TERR ATTS * ERISA RE OEY RE DARA - SRE HY SBE (21, 22,23,24] | BL A ARMOURS | HS DRSSRIA AR Be AZAR AES SRE HAST [25]: RAP SBT RTE + BR #[26](2003) 258 Tid EZ ae + ICRC SCALES AE ROADS «LA Be Ae PRAM ATE - AER ae Ie» BESS + A FR RSS B- TSAERNIAE H ER ETSR GAIUS FZ PRATT | ES SPR RES NEUES THR GI » FARIS Fi SOARES FMA AL @ FS RS SQM + AICAR PARES PSUR ROLE ERR EB, BY PRU SER SEZ 27] 2 BRA BNF A EAR Behe TS RE SAMPARA 3+ RET RT RASTER + = is # a aera of Cts Meragenet 3014 Ve 1 Nos 190 Wang ane Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society”: From the Perspective of Bourdon EAR OURS RTRSP - ATER» CfA PARR ELE SRT) « PRATER MEER ABBE FRA + LARA EER BUR CATIA» RR, ABA : URE Ol BERAANE TR OA 10 EE SZ SUGGES Zee + FIRE (LER RLTS SR RERR REMAESCERAG MATTE Bo AMERARS » RITGRBES BE TSS ORR T DABS ATE TERT RIA ai 28] » RSET: kh SURO REIT fe NRE AEBS AGS (4) HE STL BL DPA + UA i RABE EAS « BARRA eS BURA TAPS AREA A RR RAS EG > (RRC EERSTE ZB AY EIR + aR SE RPT RRA» HS RHPRLA (ARER ERAS SEMEL TAREE EER ARIPERR SAAR » EMR ERE SR KORTE + MIT RE ° ERNE ASSERT A Aa FTIR BRAE AR ER * ER, ALS POPS ART TE 77k RB a AVIRA: TES aOR TCS » RG Si SA ASS CALF SHRATANEED] - RMR AES 3 RBH RELI» LP ARS HOR + GRAS + HL, MASS OAR RAR SARA RES BLEU EMR RMATARLL] ¢ the eure of Coss Managenent 2014 Ve 1 Ns ASME LEE SMREHRERN RSL CS eM SAS AMMASISTE + ETTORE SCI, « 3 ERLE PAS ARR SL DRA EAL Oe, GPR TE RTL H+ ROSIE - BER BSP (SAGE | (expert. system) =F) PSR» URGE RST» (ATOR TRAE ZEEE * LRA RA ROKER MBA AER AEE BEER EE ESL] » TERRA RRS ARE ARORBANID AMIE RA ELL 2° Ae ARI e EES - RS AGU] ARERR AE TTR WES PREZ RAL E * MRA TR BOELATINERSIR [30] - SERRA SEMPRE * ee ee RARE TESST eS PEE,» RAS HERE aE AE OTH [2 + BERR SHEILA HL: BRET eae SSRERARIBIS1, 32] TEA Tuchman[33] 5% SB FURST EL Set: AR FHSS AS ERTL AR SERRE + Cottle[34] 8848 SEE HIE ZO fe OREABE is 1. BR eS Ff AURA PEE Se Ach I OS TILT + 2. Bec ibe eeees AT: CURL F AHS RITES TE ARR PK 3. BR LAL AE * SESE REC EBUYT - HRRGRRES + co PUREED GE RETER eee at > aA > BLE BERS peste Resa aa ae ‘t RRRAREE 2h - RRR HUE - LURE RICE (32)° BESS - HREM ER BOT t icWag aunt Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society’ From the Perspective of Bousdiew — OL SRS [SES OL SIRIS5] + HEUER MES NERA BGKR PECAN TAIGMRUSEM * HER ARIL GARGS » SREB «TE EB UES BA RR [36) « HSH epic By LE BS RT eB (AGEEAA - Eldridge|3 7] FER HSi$ Hii Zo) RE PRET REGREREAS AH FA RSS MRMA REE NERS 1: GNSS RAR ESR i + (SSR Re ROLE ES | + WSRA RUGS + RL SAE BEE > HEAR ER L38] « 3.2 BUTERA ASE ASAT RILS FARRER STEN cE + BIG APS RT REBIRTH SUAGRAER GS. + (ELDRED FL BUR AE Fl: SiS HPT LE RRM ETT ETA BUGSRES +» RAAT AS ‘EARRTRURL1] - GS ARR + AT AAR + (SEAR A Rag LE + AEE EWES DPS SRE at A ae PRES (ERAT SHER: BS Be (8 a EA RT To BNA EZ EL Nap ASRS RRM Le ZUR» AA LNARE ARES (Ue tee BRESPRAL RRS Bik TROP TRS «ACES ERTS SP PURSUE + TREK EMCEE AL TRES SR SCRE AGSRIAT S(t > RPSURLIILIE » HEE «25 (SRRN Ze RALUBS |FRAEE LS] + SPSS We RR AR» A REARS: SHAMS AREAS PACAP SE Tr PR A [40] < RUGS RR + (LTRS Se Ty HeZRRER HERABE AR] Bo STRAITS SS RS + (EL ARMA BRT «A 2013 FREE FPR PRA BRE See SS ‘ATE » SRE 2008 AecHmmnS HR aa BR A ER BUPEERE Se Riss SRE SSSR TARE BE: RE SUA, 4212 + ERS ZEEE PABA AERIS ES th ORS PR: PARLE A CHORE JAE BOVMEH ROB StAOE LL VER RAEALS ERS ee RMR AUR BS GS HR tes EA SAAT BRB ES» TERE MSREN RRS eS: OSE HM BGR ET BO iE Re eM ERC 8 PERE) Wi SS 143, 44] © RAS OR TTB SRR RAAT AGA ET ORS Z EER REO + FEL A SURG» REM SS FOC BEAT EL TAS, 46] ASIA R ZOU LS 2 RECHT at I Hs RIOR - SRB TASES BQ aT] + Rh BERS fe (48, AO] + hs GRASS T sR» BTL SERSTA : Bes IL@EE Bases HDRES + SS 0S DURE LSE ° ay RRS + TBS LIS SH RBS FRNHLALO] - HRRKRE TAA SL Hit Ey |S B36 LAS ALG RTE +» AUB SED (TERE FURR ARM «BE AD + EN SER TAH (RP BOSRRS + RMR BREET L40] + th aera of Cts Meragenet 3014 Ve 1 Nos 192 Wang ane Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society: From the Perspective of Bourdon PGR TERS IRL + BR eat Ty eae BRGY KER BERG EES SREB RAS BAR BR EMEAT AG RSE EPA ESL BRE: RARE-BUAR NNR ARPLRULBRMABA ROR RTA ASRS (C39) - RDS ABR E eR CAR RAGET Ea PRGLABRE® Gardner[52]) ERTL ESBS» STS HRRARER LES RRS FUSE UREA RTT RR SSS EREVAN 5 OF ASBUIEAEA Be RAR 2 RARE KADER EEE SPS SSSA) NRA RS DR » ESPON EAI AUT + 32H BOM Be RR E ERIM 1B SRAEMTHER ZL Be FEC AR SRA TRS ° RE FRAO PSE + I HERS > MBI Re + RB To RRB AM» AR AUER + RT GARI ES T BARES BUG STR TRE + M0 2013 ARSE SLPS Ms SR SS RO BS I KR DH AHR CAR * BAS SEGRE TEER + ASS ff ESBS RRR ° SL Atak ABRIL T Cass RISA + HATER T MAS.» (2 SEEGER Nl HZ RS Fo BEV RE RERRR: Bscnee BATES TAC 4 AUREL Ti a Say 4a CS + NEES ieee RARE ERURILA EHR AR ABUSE MOAR SR eure of Coss Managenent 2014 Ve 1 Ns RK MARS BRAD LAs BESS: SEITE BUSPAR) SGT: RSME RSE RGAE BNE RBG: RTE LAGE FORTE + ELA BEY BZ TE ABR TEA Rh » LAA #9153] » lk» BA PTERAR Te RS RES ZARSEOR ° KBGHR AREA ESCUELA FRASER TS * CERIBE (EP RAE COA A RD fA RESP RS ANS4] « FLASH FS RILS TR ICBM FIR RERSRER MH [SBS | (life politics).2 Bas EGS AA, OPE SPCR AAAS » Reis (SE RSA ASEH BLA Be TS AORERREEE[SS] : HDMI ES + AERA FAME + LMG ARIRERITE (FE BAR [56] ° BBR BAR AEE HG + DURE ROBT «LESS AEB SHE REBGA TRESEBUATS | RUSE BESS EA PEPE * Ai, SER AES PRIME TEES RAISER GRR SL (SLE RESO] « FRE BEB BGS | BOC ETS RS BOB) + ARAL H RHR THe RAGS + tee ER RR PEE + Me CMS HHS EA PASE Ti: PE ARRES + ARAM Bock "Bee EREWER , [57] - Bi RABE TGS » ESE LR REA ea * SH (RRR GORRAR + AE + ER EA TERA ZHI] » aR Bo a TEBGS ZAR > WA: LR NILe Sit SATOSHI » te: eeweha ATES PR» TRICE He REESE ZEAL FLAG * ARPS HhWag cent Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society”; From the Perspective ot Bourdiew — 93 (SAREE » REARS H SERENA RIL OREM ES BUNKATS MEER 42 habe eBay iS SF Hf R58, ER EBHS ee TSE ET AE ZI Ee * IRA Re RHI TRIER 6] » Crossley{ 02] SHES RSLS ED SSE [HR RLLINL field of contention) « 438 Sch RISAIAR ELE AIBA ZA AGLOS] + ASI + SATA LR PTE RATELY RCE LH Agee BEL eRTam ome ‘RTBU ASEAN EAR TSMR OREUER SSB PRIOR Ue LAL D (64) » ET MOSEL HG + (EFS SSS SL ETAUAVESR, - HDUREOUEIIRE A «RE PERG UMM HE EUAN RERILESe ARS OoyNES » HERR AS RRL AROZ A HEIRS 0 8 SEL HURL SHAE KELP DRAKA RRR OES AARC mT QISTRONME > HASHE ALT Leer «RT HE el HOMMEADITN mubmCAR RELL SHLOMPRRT ROLS Teme SRST RonA le ZR AROS TREN» MIRE BS RIES ER RLS LE SRE EMLS CHA: HAUL SiS BBELTEBAMMESE * ESE {SRR ATA MMT HREM ease: SEAL eS fo REE BRBALIS] « e364 [29] URSA SA BS ETE ARPS ERPS Ze | BL ATG - RBARA + Mike me BS SRERAS MLE NBH RE [68] - FEB HAST sh» MAB AU RRC RTA BSA MESA TT TEER BORER A [68] - A Et— PRR RRR RRS FEO AKRES Hat LIB + HTT RABBLE RU] » PRATT + FACS T iS BST RZ BAIR » HLS ERR ERIE EMR AS SAUER CECERE heSai Te Biere EMAAR EM LBS Zo 5 fate URAL GHIST OT» RGBIET LZ BOR + itt RT CSA T AEH RE] °F FEEL PLETE Fiz EE FEARAMBS AUREL TE SEB Gie | ZR: BARRE BRAGA + 7ST ARASH - ACHES aaa ARAMA TEM + Fei @ HAIRS BHESOR IG + RR Ase IL RE + ALAR» REMARKABLE AAR Gf: HES O RAE © RGSS SRE ASONERT ARLE RRHT AiLe Xe RMR Foo SARUM |E ARR RES A PER RES ie LC LR RA tEth AU Ee i « ESh ASCH EH RL ZA MER MSE MATES e aera of Cts Meragenet 3014 Ve 1 Nos 19A Wang ane Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society": From the Perspective of Bourdon Ro ABUSATHEST REL RAS ARCS DRE 2 ASE MEE MM» Se PERLE MTSE AR EAH PRI Z AE TTR ATED ACTS BROT ALARA T° SRR TRAPS nRe «TT SATULPTAR > BRAT HSL ASS + MAR RRA (media literacy) SURF B(demooratic literacy) » tft EB BASAL (character education) + 55 [EIR SHMRRZ RASH BRR PTR Ble GES) SORTER, » RRS PEABO SRS + ARETE + Bea WLR BRB PEM Asa + TEAL GRR CUaROe > HAIER fe 6 Bem 1 Beck, U. (2004). BVsit® - Ht S—(il BAL GER), Hat, Babi. (E1986 eLHHiG) 2 Beck, U. (1999). World risk society, Blackwell Publishers Inc, MA 3 Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society, Economy and Society, 35, 329-345, 4 BSR (19). “ BURILE, HARE HGR.” BLCBEA BEE, 09, 58-79. 5 AEA (2003), “Hit ER (LF ER XC: NA RNAS ARILG AA, 31, 153-188. 6 AAIESE (2003). “Rieite itis eed: NAG ARIS 2H” eee BEG, 30(11), 147-163. 7 Elliott, A. (2002). "Beck's Sociology of Risk: A Critical Assessment,” Sociology, 36(2), 293-315. 8 FGA (2001). “HALRB” "ARB AT, 5, 262-291. 9 FEA (2001), “BBE -M RRA eure of Coss Managenent 2014 Ve 1 Ns 20 2 St” BOB ABIeH, B iit, BabA, 127-140. Beck, UL, Giddens, A. and Lash, 8. (1994), Reflexive Modemization. Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford University Press CA. REE (2001). “BUG + HEE” BUNA ER, Eb. GdTh, 17-45, Beck, U. (1996). “Risk Society and the Provident State,” In Risk, Environment and Modemity: Towards a New Ecology, Sage, London, 27-43. STR (1997). “ASHE » Ibe SBE BREAD ReH-HRR.” RHUL BHR, 25, 1-32. Williams, 8. J. (1995). “Theorising class, health and lifestyles: can Bourdieu help us?” Sociology of Health & Ilness, 17(5), 577-604. Bonnewitz, P. (2002). Af#hi Gite 4) BR (ASMA), BBM. BibT, 73. (BYE 1997 HR) BES (2002). AMEE, HO B Atif, 194. Bourdieu, P. (2004), BERRA ORI fis) . RAL Saki. (YE 1972 eR) Bourdicu, P. (1990). The logic of practice, Polity, Cambridge. Harker, R. K. (1984). “On Reproduction, Habitus and Education,” British Journal of Sociology of Education, 5(2), 117-127 Bourdieu, P. (2010). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (R. Nice, ‘Trans.), Routledge, New York. Thomton, S. (1996). Club Cultures: Music, Media, and Subcultural Capital, Wesleyan2 24 25 26 21 28 29 30 32 ing at Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society From the Perspective of Bourtiew University Press, Hanover. Collin, M. (1997), Altered State: The Story of Festasy Culture and Acid House, Serpent's Tail, London, Salasuo, M, and Seppala, P. (2004), “Drug use within the Finnish club culture as marks of distinction,” Contemporary Drug Problems, 31, 213-229. Cohen, B. (2010). “Clubbing Subcultures, Subcultural Capital and BZP-Party Pills in Now Zealand. Paper presented at the What's It Worth?” Value and Popular Music Selected papers from the 2009 TASPM Australia Zealand, ‘Melbourne, Australia, New conference,” Poland, B. and Holmes, D. (2009). “Celebrating Risk: The Politics of Self-Branding, ‘Transgression & Resistance in Public Health,” Aporia, 1(4), 27-36. BOGE (2003). “EP ESUR TERESI: bh Bourdieu HEH EES ATA WiLGSA, 5, 73-132. Crawshaw, P. and Bunton, R. (2009). ° Logics of practice in the risk environment,” Health, Risk & Society, 11(3), 269-282. Rhodes, ‘T. (2002). “The “risk environment’: 1 framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm,” International Journal of Drug Poliey, 13, 85-94, Bourdieu, P. and Wacquant, L. (2008). #34 SELeSHER (FRRERR) . FE FH, BAEr, 206-200. Beck, U. (1997), The Reinvention of Politics, Polity Press, Cambridge. Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding What*s News, Random House, New York. Davidson, D. J, and Bogdan, E. (2010), 33 35 36 37 38. a1 a2 95 “Reflexive Modemization at the Local Media Source: Coverage of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in Rural Alberta,” Canadian Review of Sociology, AT(4), 359-380. ‘Tuchman, G. (1978). Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality, The Free Press, New York, 190. Cottle, $. (1998). “Ulrich Beck,"risk society” and the media: A catastrophic view?” European Journal of Communication, 13(1), 532, Schon, D. A. and Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies, Basie Books, New York. Beck, U. (2009). World at risk, Polity Press, Cambridge, 98. Eldridge, J. (1999). “Risksociety and the media: Now you see it, now you don't,” In Message Received: Glasgow Media Group Research 1993-1998, Longman, New York, 106-127, BSA (2003). “Ura NARS: SETS PARR.” ERR Fe, (1), 99-128, Bourdieu, P, (2000), *iai/EAEM FE We ). HK, Abii. 30, 51-59, 103. (AYE 1996 FEAR. Bourdicu, P. (2002), [HBr eae BUA GARG . AHMAR. adc. 53-55, 119. (HE 1998 FEHiD). SEA (2000). “BLAM MESSER VE: BIE,” TAA SRA GREMAN ERAS. LR (2003). MELA REA BM: PEM SSSR Be. A EARSSRERESS, Sith. Ferre of Cis Morogeoet 014 Ved Ne 196 Wang and Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society": Fro the Perspective of Bourdon 43 Barker, D. C. (1999). “Rushed decisions: Political talk radio 1994-1996,” Journal of Politics, 61, 527-530. 44 Barker, D. C. and Knight, K. (2000). “Political talk radio and public opinion,” and vote choice, Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(2), 149-170, 45 GURL (2005). (RANE ITA Bia ERCHMRSGAR : RENE HOMER E” PHSB. 8 211-246. 46 ESR] (2013). “RAL AINE ETE RACH TR SSA.” HS $9203 £8, Siti. BREE (2009), “SRR Re SAY: SBSH aT RRES a(t), SSR, wt, GALTE, 3-17. 48 AR + HER (2000). “SBR RATS HRM? SORES, 3, 85-128, 49 BEM (2009), “FEAT ZB (220 3E-L, TVBSN §€ SET-N 2gat 312 TASS,” SRST, 911), 33-64, 50 RBCS (2012). Rit SR AS, (SES0HF9E | L, 2010-2011 See TT Bil” PRSBBS 202 Ee, Atri. BRE (2009), “HTS.” GaSe sae, By, aati, OHV. Gardner, D. (2009). FRERME - BRSLASER, Bb SSERRSSS), SESE BALTH, (RYE 2009 FEHR. FEE (2005). "BSL FILS ZIG RB.” BOSS RBS, BUSI, ab, 125-172. 34 SEY (1998). “SAVE RBURILE,” & £ 51 5: 5 eure of Coss Managenent 2014 Ve 1 Ns 5 3 s 37 38 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Mth @AF I, 21, 89-129. Giddens, A. (2002), VERE RBA CHRRRRA®), BH, BAL. (EVE 1991 EHH) SR (2000), HKRARH Bot. a Atri. PRGA (2000). “HURTS TTL ee Ba” BK, 154, 20-35. Diani, M. (1992). “The concept of social movement,” Sociological Review, 40(1), 1-25. Diani, M. and McAdam, D. (2003). Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, McCarthy, J. and Zald. M. (1977). “Resource — Mobilization and Social Movements,” American Journal of. Sociology, $2, 1212-1241, Moi, T. (1991). “Appropriating Bourdiew: Feminist Theory and Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology of Culture,” New Literary History, 22, 1017-1049, Crossley, N. (2003). “From Reproduction to ‘Transformation: Social Movements Fields and the Radical Habitus,” Theory, Culture & Society, 20, 43-68, Bilig, B. (2010). “Bourdieu. and social movements theories: Some preliminary remarks on a possible conceptual cross-fertilization in the context of (post) Yugoslav anti-war and peace activism,” Sociologija, 52(4), 377-398. SEBEL MARR (2010). SRL BWR. Byadt, 174. SET BR (2008), “SPR RPT CR," 2013 # 2 AR 23 8 RA hitp:/www.coolloud.org.tw/node/31619Wx aunt Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society’ From the Perspective of Bousdieu — 97 66 AEBS (2010). “Swi SSAA! —- 6 Bourdieu, P. (2003). bik k fA (BER ti” SRL@BHEHA, Bot, Git. Wi@ Ea CREA . ALLER, St 3-10. THE, CORE 2001 SEHD. 67 STM (2007). “HRA,” FEAR 7, AF 69 AREA (2002). “fet LEI REE BDO TEER ie, BR. Gab. RO - SRV ARLS.” SRL 85-118. SHEFF, 45, 69-122. aera of Cts Meragenet 3014 Ve 1 Nos 198 Wang ane Lin, Revisiting “Risk Society": From the Perspective of Bourdiou Revisiting “Risk Society”: From the Perspective of Bourdieu Y. P, Wang and C. C. Lin ABSTRACT This article seeks to roview influential “risk society” thesis of Ulrich Beck on iis central ideas of reflexivity, ‘media, and sub politics in Taiwan soctoty from the salience ofthe cultural sociology of Pierre Bourdiou, We find that under the socio-cultural comtext in Taiwan, the citizen, media, and social movement do not fully respond to risk as Beck expected. Therefore, we call for 2 need of localizing risk society theory, and the social ethos should be changed through education. KEYWORDS: Risk Society; Plerre Bourdieu: Reflaeive Modernity; Media; Social Movement Professor Yu Po! Wang, Center for General Education, Chong Shiu University, Tatwan. Chih Cheng Lin, Janior Contract Employee, National Sclence and Technology Museum: Ph.D. student at Graduate Institute of AduttEducatton, Nationa’ Kaohstung —Normat University, Taiwan. Gatan32@ math nstin gov.) © 2014 Crisis Managemem Society Taiwan, R.O.C. Manuscript received November 11, 2013; accepted Februaty 25, 2014. JCM140302126PBS Journal of Ces Managenent 014 Vel Ne