So we can see that in this cohort:

 Majority of the respondents (65.0%) is in favor of death penalty for murder.

 A greater portion of LT High School respondents is in favor (57.2%) to death penalty for murder
than those who oppose (42.8%).
  A greater portion of High School respondents is in favor (68.3%) to death penalty for murder
than those who oppose (31.7%).
 A greater portion of Junior College respondents is in favor (74.3%) to death penalty for murder
than those who oppose (25.7%).
 A greater portion of Bachelor respondents is in favor (63.8%) to death penalty for murder than
those who oppose (36.2%).
 A greater portion of Graduate respondents is in favor (53.1%) to death penalty for murder than
those who oppose (46.9%).

Null Hypothesis:

H0: There is no significant association between repondent’s highest degree attained and their
stand in death penalty for murder.
H0: There is no difference in the distribution of their stand in death penalty for murder and the
respondent’s highest degree attained.

 The p-value for the chi-square statistic is .000, which is smaller than the alpha level
of .05. Therefore, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Conclusion: Evidence from the sample shows that there is a significant difference in the distribution of
the respondent’s stand to death penalty for murder and the highest degree they attained.