Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Team 04 - Full Report PDF
Team 04 - Full Report PDF
2021/2022
PRODUCTION OF ACRYLONITRILE FROM
AMMONIA
SV: IR DR TAN LIAN SEE
SMJC 4824
CHEMICAL PROCESS DESIGN
ii
line, the P&ID of the plant was able to be designed that include the process control
system. The Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) analysis, Chemical Health Risk
Assestment CHRA, plant layout, and plant start-up and shut down procedure also has
been prepared.For the economic analysis of the production plant, with the total capital
investment, CTCI of RM 62,185,593.28, the return of investment (ROI) of the
acrylonitrile production plant is at 875.24% with the payback period of acrylonitrile
production plant is estimated to be 5 years after 3 years of start-up period.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
LIST OF TABLES xi
LIST OF FIGURES xvi
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 Company Background 1
1.2 Chemical Background Study 2
1.2.1 Acrylonitrile 2
1.2.2 Ammonia 5
1.3 Market Survey for Acrylonitrile 7
1.3.1 Introduction 7
1.3.2 The Production of Ammonia 7
1.3.3 The Availability of Ammonia in Asia 8
1.3.4 World Production of Acrylonitrile 9
1.3.5 World Consumption of Acrylonitrile 10
1.4 Site Selection 12
1.4.1 Factors Affecting the Site Selection 12
iv
2.2 Block Flow Diagram for Selected Process Route 27
2.3 Sustainability Justification 27
2.3.1 Safety Factor 27
2.3.2 Economic of Acrylonitrile Production 28
2.3.3 Environment Factor 28
2.3.4 Circular Economy Definition 30
2.3.5 Circular Economy Concept in Production of
Acrylonitrile 31
2.3.6 Net Zero Carbon 32
2.4 Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia 33
2.4.1 Process Flow Diagram 34
2.4.2 Process Description 35
2.4.3 Chemical Reaction 36
2.5 Equipment Basis 36
2.5.1 Fluidized bed Reactor 36
2.5.2 Flash column 45
2.5.3 Distillation Column 52
2.5.4 Absorption Column 61
2.5.5 Auxiliary 66
2.5.5.1 Cooler 66
2.5.5.2 Heater 67
2.5.5.3 Pump 68
2.6 Manual Calculation 69
2.6.1 Mass Balance 69
2.6.1.1 Pump (P-101) 70
2.6.1.2 Pump (P-102) 71
2.6.1.3 Heater (E-101) 72
2.6.1.4 Heater (E-102) 73
2.6.1.5 Fluidized bed Reactor (R-101) 74
2.6.1.6 Cooler (E-103) 74
v
2.6.1.7 Flash Column (F-101) 75
2.6.1.8 Cooler (E-104) 76
2.6.1.9 Distillation Column (C-101) 77
2.6.1.10 Absorption Column (C-102) 78
2.6.1.11 Cooler (E-105) 79
2.6.1.12 Flash column (F-102) 80
2.6.2 Energy Balance 81
2.6.2.1 Pump (P-101) 86
2.6.2.2 Pump (P-102) 87
2.6.2.3 Heater (E-101) 88
2.6.2.4 Heater (E-102) 89
2.6.2.5 Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101) 90
2.6.2.6 Cooler (E-103) 91
2.6.2.7 Flash Column (F-101) 92
2.6.2.8 Cooler (E-104) 93
2.6.2.9 Distillation Column (C-101) 94
2.6.2.10 Absorption Column (C-102) 95
2.6.2.11 Cooler (E-105) 96
2.6.2.12 Flash column (F-102) 97
2.7 PRO/II Simulation 99
2.8 Comparison of Manual and Simulation Calculation 103
2.8.1 Mass Balance Comparison 103
2.8.2 Energy Balance Comparison 105
vi
3.1.4 Standards and Regulations for Wastewater
Management in Malaysia 112
3.2 Sources of Waste 112
3.3 Solid Waste 113
3.3.1 Source of Solid Waste 113
3.3.2 Management of Solid Waste 114
3.3.3 Comparison and Selected Solution 115
3.4 Liquid Waste 115
3.4.1 Source of Liquid Waste 116
3.4.2 Management of Liquid Waste 116
3.4.2.1 Wastewater Treatment of Ethyl
Acrylate and Water from S-13 117
3.4.2.2 Comparison and Selected Solution 119
3.4.2.3 Waste Treatment of Ethanol and
Dimethyl Sulfoxide from S15 120
3.4.2.4 Comparison and Selected Solution 122
3.5 Gas Waste 123
3.5.1 Source of Gas Waste 123
3.5.2 Management of Gas Waste 124
3.5.2.1 Waste Treatment of Ammonia,
Acrylonitrile and Ethanol in S9 125
3.5.2.2 Comparison and Selected Solution 127
3.5.2.3 Waste Treatment of Ammonia and
Acrylonitrile Gas from S18 128
3.5.2.4 Comparison and Selected Solution 130
vii
4.6 Above Pinch and Below Pinch Design 143
4.7 Comparison between Utilities Consumption Before
and After MER 147
4.7.1 Total Utilities Consumption Before Heat
Integration 147
4.7.2 Total Utilities Consumption After Heat
Integration 147
viii
6.3.1 Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) 190
6.4 Fire Hazard 191
6.4.1 Fire Detection and Alarm System 192
6.5 Plant Emergency Response 193
6.6 Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP) 194
6.6.1 Introduction 194
6.6.2 The Purposes of HAZOP 194
6.6.3 Steps to Complete HAZOP Analysis 195
6.6.4 HAZOP studies in selected equipment 197
6.6.5 HAZOP Study on Heat Exchangers, Heaters
and Coolers 202
6.6.6 HAZOP Study on Pumps 202
6.6.7 HAZOP Study on Reactor 205
6.6.8 HAZOP Study on Flash Column 208
6.6.9 HAZOP Study on Distillation Column 211
6.6.10 HAZOP Study on Absorption Column 214
6.6.11 HAZOP Study on Flash Column 217
6.7 Chemical Health Risk Assessment (CHRA) 220
6.8 Plant Start-Up and Shut Down Procedure 233
6.8.1 Plant Start-Up Procedure 233
6.8.2 Plant Shut-Down Procedure 235
6.9 Plant Layout 238
ix
7.2.6 Cooler (E-106, E-107 and E-108) 273
7.2.7 Heat Exchanger (E-101, E-102 and E-105) 279
7.2.8 Pump (P-101 and P-102) 286
7.3 Waste Treatment Cost 290
7.4 Utilities Cost 291
7.5 Total Labor Cost 293
7.6 Profit Margin 294
7.7 Total Capital Investment 296
7.8 Total Depreciable Capital 298
7.9 Total Annual Production Cost 299
7.10 Cash Flow Analysis 301
7.11 Conclusion 311
REFERENCES 313
APPENDIX II 321
x
LIST OF TABLES
xi
Table 2.17 Mass balance on Flash column (F-101) 76
Table 2.18 Mass balance on Cooler (E-104) 77
Table 2.19 Mass balance on Distillation Column (C-101) 78
Table 2.20 Mass balance on absorption column (C-102) 79
Table 2.21 Mass balance on cooler (E-105) 80
Table 2.22 Mass balance on flash column (F-102) 81
Table 2.23 Energy balance on pump (P-101) 86
Table 2.24 Energy balance on pump (P-102) 87
Table 2.25 Energy balance on heater (E-101) 88
Table 2.26 Energy balance on heater (E-102) 89
Table 2.27 Energy balance on Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101) 90
Table 2.28 Energy balance on Cooler (E-103) 91
Table 2.29 Energy balance on Flash column (F-101) 92
Table 2.30 Energy balance on Cooler (E-104) 93
Table 2.31 Energy balance on Distillation Column (C-101) 94
Table 2.32 Energy balance on absorption column (C-102) 95
Table 2.33 Energy balance on cooler (E-105) 97
Table 2.34 Energy balance on flash column (F-102) 98
Table 2.35 List of components used in PRO/II Simulation. 99
Table 2.36 List of unit operation used in PRO/II Simulation. 99
Table 2.37 Comparison of the manual mass balance calculation with
the simulation 103
Table 2.38 Comparison of Simulation done by PRO/II and manual
calculation in enthalpy flow rate (kJ/hr). 105
Table 3.1 The waste classifications generated by the production plant
and their sources of generation. 112
Table 3.2 The Option of Technology to Treat Solid Waste 115
Table 3.3 Technologies that can be used to treat liquid wastes 116
Table 3.4 Comparison of Technology to Treat S13 119
xii
Table 3.5 Comparison of Technology to Treat S15. 122
Table 3.6 The component exists in gas effluent from S9 124
Table 3.7 Technologies that can be used to treat gaseous wastes 124
Table 3.8 Comparison of the technology to treat S9. 127
Table 3.9 The Component Exists in Gas Effluent from S18 128
Table 3.10 Comparison of The Technology to Treat S18. 130
Table 4.1 Summary of the hot and cold stream available for heat
integration 134
Table 4.2 Hot composite data 136
Table 4.3 Cold composite data 136
Table 4.4 Actual temperature and shifted temperature 140
Table 4.5 Problem Table algorithm 141
Table 4.6 Utilities consumption before heat integration 147
Table 4.7 Utilities consumption after heat integration 147
Table 5.1 List of legends in P&ID layout. 153
Table 5.2 List of symbols used in P&ID. 156
Table 5.3 Control system analysis of reactor (R-101) 159
Table 5.4 Control system analysis for flash drum (F-101) 161
Table 5.5 Control system analysis of flash column (F-102) 163
Table 5.6 Control system analysis of distillation column 1 (C-101) 166
Table 5.7 Control system analysis of absorption column (C-102) 170
Table 5.8 Process control analysis of heat exchanger (E-101) 172
Table 5.9 Process control analysis of heat exchanger (E-102) 173
Table 5.10 Process control analysis of heat exchanger (E-105) 174
Table 5.11 Process control analysis of heater (E-103) 176
Table 5.12 Process control analysis of heater (E-104) 176
Table 5.13 Control system analysis of cooler (E-106) 178
Table 5.14 Control system analysis of cooler (E-107) 178
xiii
Table 5.15 Control system analysis of cooler (E-108) 179
Table 5.16 Process control analysis of pump (P-101) 181
Table 5.17 Process control analysis of pump (P-102) 182
Table 6.1 General PPE at workplace 190
Table 6.2 Guide Words for HAZOP Analysis 196
Table 6.3 Deviations generated from guide words and parameters 197
Table 6.4 HAZOP on Heat Exchanger and Pump 203
Table 6.5 HAZOP on Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101) 206
Table 6.6 HAZOP on Flash Column (F-101) 209
Table 6.7 HAZOP on Distillation Column (C-101) 212
Table 6.8 HAZOP on Absorption Column (C-102) 215
Table 6.9 HAZOP on Flash Column (F-102) 218
Table 6.10 Chemical used in work unit 221
Table 6.11 Chemicals released by the processes or work activities 224
Table 6.12 Inhalation exposure assessment 229
Table 6.13 Dermal Assessment 230
Table 6.14 Control Measures and Recommendations 231
Table 7.1 Design Summary for Fluidized Bed Reactor 249
Table 7.2 Equipment Specification Sheet of Flash Column (F-101) 256
Table 7.3 Equipment Specification Sheet of Flash Column (F-102) 257
Table 7.4 Equipment Specification Sheet of Distillation Column (C-101) 260
Table 7.5 Material of Construction Factor, FM (Coulson & Richardson.,
2018) 265
Table 7.6 Bare-Module Factors, FBM (Coulson & Richardson., 2018) 265
Table 7.7 Equipment Specification Sheet of Absorption Column (C-102) 266
Table 7.8 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heater (E-103) 270
Table 7.9 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heater (E-104) 272
Table 7.10 Equipment Specification Sheet of Cooler (E-106) 276
xiv
Table 7.11 Equipment Specification Sheet of Cooler (E-107) 277
Table 7.12 Equipment Specification Sheet of Cooler (E-108) 278
Table 7.13 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger (E-101) 282
Table 7.14 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger (E-102) 283
Table 7.15 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger (E-105) 285
Table 7.16 Equipment Specification Sheet of Pump (P-101) 289
Table 7.17 Equipment Specification Sheet of Pump (P-102) 289
Table 7.18 Wastewater streams discharged 290
Table 7.19 Allocated cost for utility of the plant 291
Table 7.20 Operating labor estimation cost 293
Table 7.21 Raw material cost 294
Table 7.22 Product revenue cost 295
Table 7.23 Summarization of total costs 298
Table 7.24 Summarization of total depreciable cost, CTDC 299
Table 7.25 Summary of total annual production cost 300
Table 7.26 Cash flow analysis for acrylonitrile production plant 303
Table 7.27 Discounted Factor Cash Flow Analysis for Interest Rate of 5%,
10% and 15% 307
xv
LIST OF FIGURES
xvi
Figure 2.14 Symbol of pump (P-101) 70
Figure 2.15 Symbol of pump (P-102) 71
Figure 2.16 Symbol of heater (E-101) 72
Figure 2.17 Symbol of heater (E-102) 73
Figure 2.18 Symbol of Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101) 74
Figure 2.19 Symbol of Cooler (E-103) 75
Figure 2.20 Symbol of Flash column (F-101) 76
Figure 2.21 Symbol of cooler (E-104) 77
Figure 2.22 Symbol of Distillation Column (C-101) 78
Figure 2.23 Symbol of absorption column (C-102) 79
Figure 2.24 Symbol of cooler (E-105) 80
Figure 2.25 Symbol of flash column (F-102) 81
Figure 2.26 Symbol of pump (P-101) 86
Figure 2.27 Symbol of pump (P-102) 87
Figure 2.28 Symbol of heater (E-101) 88
Figure 2.29 Symbol of heater (E-102) 89
Figure 2.30 Symbol of Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101) 90
Figure 2.31 Symbol of Cooler (E-103) 91
Figure 2.32 Symbol of Flash column (F-101) 92
Figure 2.33 Symbol of Cooler (E-104) 93
Figure 2.34 Symbol of Distillation Column (C-101) 94
Figure 2.35 Symbol of absorption column (C-102) 95
Figure 2.36 Symbol of cooler (E-105) 96
Figure 2.37 Symbol of flash column (F-102) 98
Figure 2.38 Flowsheet of the process flow diagram in PRO/II
Simulation 102
Figure 3.1 The Waste Management Hierarchy 108
Figure 3.2 Sustainable Development Goals (United Nations, 2020) 110
xvii
Figure 3.3 Ultraviolet decomposition system of DMSO wastewater
(Koito et al. (1998)) 121
Figure 3.4 Wet Scrubber 126
Figure 3.5 The mechanism of dry scrubber equipment. 130
Figure 4.1 Pinch analysis diagram (Klemeš & Kravanja, 2013) 134
Figure 4.2 Hot Composite Curve 137
Figure 4.3 Cold Composite Curve 137
Figure 4.4 Hot & Cold Composite Curve 138
Figure 4.5 Shifted composite curve for ∆Tmin = 10℃ 138
Figure 4.6 Heat exchanger network (HEN) for below and above pinch
for maximum energy recovery 146
Figure 4.7 Process flow diagram after heat integration 148
Figure 5.1 Feedback controller diagram 152
Figure 5.2 Feedforward controller diagram. 152
Figure 5.3 Cascade controller diagram. 153
Figure 5.4 Control system design of reactor (R-101) 160
Figure 5.5 Control system design of flash column (F-101) 162
Figure 5.6 Control system design of flash column (F-102) 164
Figure 5.7 Control system design for distillation column 1 (C-101) 169
Figure 5.8 Control system design of absorption column (C-102) 171
Figure 5.9 Control System of Heat Exchanger E-101. 173
Figure 5.10 Control System of Heat Exchanger E-102 174
Figure 5.11 Control System of Heat Exchanger E-105. 175
Figure 5.12 Process control design of heater (E-103) 176
Figure 5.13 Process control design of heater (E-104) 177
Figure 5.14 Control system design of cooler (E-106) 178
Figure 5.15 Control system design of cooler (E-107) 179
Figure 5.16 Control system design of cooler (E-108) 180
Figure 5.17 Process control design of pump (P-101) 181
xviii
Figure 5.18 Process control design of pump (P-102) 182
Figure 6.1 Figure 1 P&ID part 1 of 3 199
Figure 6.2 P&ID part 2 of 3 200
Figure 6.3 P&ID part 3 of 3 201
Figure 7.1 Cumulative cash flow diagram with 0% interest rate 304
Figure 7.2 Discounted Factor Cash Flow Analysis for Interest Rate of 5%,
10% and 15% 309
xix
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1
1.2 Chemical Background Study
1.2.1 Acrylonitrile
Table 1.1 Chemical and physical properties for Acrylonitrile from Chemical
Book (2017)
Molecular formula C3H3N
2
Specific Density 0.81g/cm3 at 25oC
ACN, according to the Material Safety Data Sheet (2021) is a very flammable
substance, and the vapor will travel a considerable distance before burning. Containers
can expand or degrade as a result of heating, raising the danger of a severe rupture.
Ignition can occur when the environment is polluted with oxidizing compounds such
as nitrates, oxidizing acids, chlorine bleaching, and pool chlorine. Flammable
substances could be housed in a secure cabinet or room apart from the rest. Collect and
store all rubbish in a sealed container until the garbage disposal is inspected. Maintain
a safe distance between yourself and both light and ignition sources. All materials used
in products should be kept cool, well-ventilated, and grounded.
For inhalation risk, evaporating the ACN rapidly results in severe air pollution.
Along with the risk of chemical pneumonitis, eating the fluid may result in aspiration
into the lungs, posing severe complications (Acrylonitrile MSDS - 800834 - Merck,
n.d.). ACN is absorbed through unbroken skin, posing a threat to the central nervous
system. Contact with the liquid for an extended period may result in the production of
vesicles and burns resembling a second-degree thermal burn (Levels, 2008). Limit the
risk of any leak to mitigate, to the extent practicable, the chance to human health and
the environment. Wear complete and suitable personal protection equipment.
3
Figure 1.2 The Safety Information of Acrylonitrile (Acrylonitrile MSDS-800834
– Merck, n.d.)
Acrylic and modacrylic fibres are generally manufactured from the primary
ingredient ACN. In addition to acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) and (SAN)
plastics, ACN rubbers, nitrile barrier resins, adiponitrile, and acrylamide are used in
several other applications (Acrylonitrile Market | 2021 - 26 | Industry Share, Size,
Growth - Mordor Intelligence, n.d.). Nitrile gloves have several advantages over
different types of gloves because they are more resistant to punctures and chemicals
than latex or even vinyl. According to the Environment Health Organization, non-
powdered gloves are advised for persons working in healthcare settings since they
prevent reactivity with alcohol-based hand rub. Hence, they're worth considering in
today's world when we must constantly sanitize our hands against infections.
4
1.2.2 Ammonia
Ammonia (NH3 ) will be used as the raw material in this process to create ACN.
According to statistics, ammonia produced 235 million tonnes worldwide in 2019,
ranking it the second most-produced chemical commodity behind sulfuric acid
(H2 SO4 ) (Venkat & Jim, 2016). Ammonia is a colourless and odourless gas formed of
nitrogen and hydrogen atoms. It occurs naturally in the human body and nature, in
water, soil, air, and microscopic bacteria molecules. Both ammonia and ammonium
ions are critical components of several metabolic processes in the human body.
Ammonia is produced by the human body when protein-containing foods are broken
down into ammonia and amino acids. The ammonia is then converted to urea.
Additionally, it is critical in manufacturing a variety of products that we use daily.
Table 1.3 summarizes the physical and chemical properties of ammonia.
Table 1.3 Physical and Chemical propertires for Ammonia from Chemical Book
(2017)
Molecular formula NH3
5
According to the Ammonia Safety Data Sheet for inhalation risk, harmful air
pollution can occur very quickly if a large amount of ammonia is released. The extent
to which health effects occur depends on the route of exposure, the dose, and the length
of time under consideration. When exposed to the high concentration of ammonia in
the air, the eyes become quickly burned, nose, throat, and respiratory tract causing
blindness, lung damage, and death (Levels, 2008). Inhalation of lower concentrations
may result in coughing and nasal and throat discomfort. The following table
summarizes the safety data for ammonia taken from the Material Safety Data Sheet:
Ammonia (2019).
Reactivity
0 Typically, stable.
6
Usually, dependable around the majority of ammonia produced by industry is
used as fertiliser in agriculture, accounting for 80 per cent of total production (Ghavam
et al., 2021). Additionally, ammonia is utilized as a refrigerant gas, a water purifier,
and a raw material in manufacturing plastics, explosives, textiles, pesticides, and
colours. It is an ingredient in a variety of household and industrial cleaning products.
Ammonia-based household cleaning solutions combine ammonia gas with water and
typically contain 5% and 10% ammonia. Industrial ammonia solutions can contain up
to 25% ammonia and are corrosive (Ammonia Uses and Benefits | Chemical Safety
Facts, n.d.).
1.3.1 Introduction
A summary of the market survey for production and use of ACN will be
discussed in this chapter. The market demand of ACN and availability of ammonia
also will be addressed in this chapter.
7
300bar in the presence of iron (Fe) based catalyst (Garagounis et al., 2014). Globally,
more than 90% of ammonia is produced from fossil fuels through this method.
Throughout the quarter of ending March 2021, demand for ammonia in the
domestic Asian market remained stable to firm. Though supply remained tight, trading
activities were hampered by congestion on prime trading routes, as well as increased
cargo and shipping costs. Meanwhile, the Chinese lunar year reduced the inventories
of Chinese manufacturers, putting an additional burden on prices. The price of aqueous
ammonia in the Indian market increased by 7.07 percent during the quarter, reaching
USD 313.28 per MT in March.
8
Ammonia prices levelled off in the September 2021, as previous market
sentiments remained stable in the domestic market. During the last week of August,
the Asian market saw a significant drop in Ammonia offered quotations. Ammonia
prices recovered in the first two weeks of September and then stabilized in the third
week. Ammonia prices in India increased from USD 664/MT to USD 798/MT.
During COVID-19 pandemic, the demand for ACN was quite high as it was
used in the production of nitrile gloves. The combination of ACN, butadiene and latex
rubber will make the nitrile rubber to produce gloves (Cartsos, n.d.). The rapid
manufacturing of nitrile gloves, which are largely employed in the resilient and
growing healthcare area, has had a positive impact on the nitrile rubber market. The
following chart below shows the world consumption of ACN in 2021 according to IHS
Markit’s Chemical Economics Handbook. From the chart, it shows that Mainland
China was the major use of ACN followed by other Asia countries.
9
Figure 1.4 World consumption of acrylonitrile in 2021 (IHS Markit’s Chemical
Economics Handbook)
10
Figure 1.5 Acrylonitrile market demand by application expected in US from
2016 to 2027 (Market Analysis Report)
The figure shows the ACN market demand by application that is expected from
2016 to 2027 in the United States. In 2019, the global market size for ACN was valued
at USD 11.8 million with an expectation to achieve a CAGR of 4.3% from 2020 to
2027. One of the major factors of the increasing demand of ACN is the demand for
acrylic fibres that were manufactured from ACN. ACN is also used as a main raw
material in the manufacture of plastics and composites, which is expected to boost
global demand.
11
According to Mordor Intelligence, the consumption of ASB resins is increasing
by about 40% from another consumer which is the largest end-user segment. The
second-largest end-user comes from the consumption of acrylic fibres by the electrical
and electronics industry which is about 25% of overall consumption. About 12% of
global ABS resin used is consumed by the automobile industry. The world production
of automobiles has begun to decline. According to the Organization for International
Cooperation on Automobiles (OICA), automotive production fell by roughly 23% in
the first nine months of 2020 compared to the same period in 2019. In the following
years, this is projected to have an impact on ABS resin consumption. All of the
aforementioned factors are projected to have an impact on ACN demand during the
forecast period.
The location of a plant can has a major impact on the economics and
development possibilities of a project. Many factors must be considered while
12
choosing a good location, including raw material supply, transportation infrastructure,
labour availability, utility availability, and land availability.
The availability and pricing of necessary raw materials typically decide the
site's location. Chemical plants should be positioned near the primary raw material, as
long as the cost of shipping the product does not exceed the cost of delivering feed
(Towler & Sinnott, 2013). A location close to the raw material source is highly
preferred because it can save raw material transportation costs. For our plant, the main
raw material is ammonia. Therefore, we need to choose the closest location to the
company that supply ammonia.
The transportation of supplies and products to and from the facility can be the
most important factor to consider when choosing a location. The transportation cost
will be lower if the plant chosen was closest to the major transport. The most
convenient ways to import/export a product is through road, railway, seaport, or
airport. Road transportation is becoming more popular, and it is well suited to local
distribution from a central warehouse. Rail delivery of bulk chemicals over long
distances is usually less expensive while the seaport is the best way to import/export
the product if the client is from another countries. Among of the three locations,
Kerteh, Terengganu is the strategic place because it near to seaport (31.8 km)
compared to Gurun, Kedah (58.9 km) and Sipitang, Sabah (140 km).
13
(c) Availability of Labour
Construction and operation of the plant will involve labour. Despite the fact
that trained construction workers are usually brought in from outside the site, there
should be enough unskilled personnel available for training to operate the plant locally.
Employees with highly skilled such as electricians, welders, and pipe fitters will be
needed for plant maintenance. Local employment laws, trade union rules, and
protectionist measures must all be considered when evaluating the availability and
suitability of local workforce for recruiting and training (Sinnott & Towler, 2020).
Utilities become one of the most important criteria in deciding the right
location for plant production. The main utilities that compulsory to have been water
supply and power supply utilities. In past research, it is stated that manufacturing
industry in US has consumed about 650 billion kWh per year, 30% from the total
consumption (Kahane & Squitieri, 1987). It shows how important the utilities to
manufacturing plant especially during heating and cooling process. From the study, it
is found out that all the three proposed location had provided the utilities needed. For
Sipitang, Sabah, the electricity supply is obtained from Sabah Electricity Sdn. Bhd.,
and the located near to SOGIP Water Treatment Plant, Sipitang. For Kerteh,
Terengganu area, the power supply can be obtained from Stesen Janakuasa TNB
Sultan Ismail, Paka or YTL Power Station while the water resources are from Syarikat
Air Terengganu. At Gurun, Kedah, it is located nearer to TNB HVDC Station and
Syarikat Air Darul Aman
14
(e) Availability of Suitable Land
In deciding the most suitable land to build the production plant, the current
price of the land is the most important factors that need to be considered. Low rate of
land price will be the most preferable since it will lower the initial cost before
constructing the production plant. It is also necessary to find a wider land since the
manufacturer need to consider for possible expansion in the future. Steve Wright stated
that in deciding the right location of the plant, choose a location that provide space of
possible upgrading (Wright et al., 2019). In this project, the price for a square foot of
the land at Kerteh, Terengganu is RM 18 which is the lowest price among all the three
location proposed. The land price in Gurun, Kedah marked at RM 22.96 per sqft while
Sipitang, Sabah reached highest land price with RM 48 per sqft.
Malaysia has been selected as the base location for the manufacturing area. The
higher demand of ACN production had opened the opportunities to Malaysia to
become one of the strategic countries to produce it. From that, it has been narrowed to
three strategic locations. The first location is Sipitang, Sabah. The second location is
at Kerteh, Terengganu and followed by Gurun, Kedah for the third location.
2-Average
3-More Preferable
15
Table 1.5 Comparison for Site Selection
Kompleks
Pentadbiran
PETRONAS
Petrokimia PETRONAS
Chemicals
PETRONAS, Chemicals
Fertilizer Sabah
Fertilizer
Sdn Bhd, KM 105, Jalan Kedah Sdn Bhd
Kuantan-Kuala
Jalan SOGIP 4,
Terengganu KM 3, Jalan
Raw Material Sipitang Oil & Jeniang
30% 24300, Kertih,
Supply Gas Industrial
Kemaman 08300, Gurun
Park,
Terengganu Kedah Darul
89850,
Darul Iman Aman
Sipitang, Sabah
Kota Kinabalu
Kemaman Port Penang Port,
Port
Transport 31.8km 58.9km
20% 140km
Facilities
Availability of
Labour 10% 3 x 10% = 0.3 3 x 10% = 0.3 3 x 10% = 0.3
Stesen
Sabah
Availability of Janakuasa TNB TNB HVDC
20% Electricity
Utilities Sultan Ismail, Station
Sdn.Bhd.
Paka
16
SOGIP Water YTL Power
Treatment Station
Syarikat Air
Plant, Sipitang Darul Aman
Syarikat Air
Terengganu
TOTAL 2 3 2.4
All the three location was chosen because it is located near to the ammonia
supply. From Table 1.1, the weightage of raw material supply factor is 30%f from the
total factor since this factor is the main concern before choosing a right location. For
Sipitang, Sabah area, the ammonia supply can be obtained from PETRONAS
Chemicals Fertiliser Sabah Sdn Bhd. For Kerteh and Gurun area, it can be obtained
from Kompleks Pentadbiran Petrokimia PETRONAS and PETRONAS Chemicals
Fertiliser Kedah Sdn Bhd respectively.
All the location proposed also near to the seaport. However, Kerteh,
Terengganu area obtained the highest score which is 3 since the area is close to
Kemaman Port, with distance of 31.8 km rather than Gurun, Kedah which is 58.9 km
from Penang Port and Sipitang, Sabah which is 140 km from Kota Kinabalu Port. For
labour availability factor, all the three states were obtained highest mark since it is
believed that all the employer will not having difficulty in recruiting manpower. From
the website of Graduates Statistic 2020, it is stated that the number of graduates in
Malaysia was 5.36 million persons, with increment of 4.4% from 2019 (Department
17
of Statistics Malaysia Official Portal, n.d.). This indicate that many qualified
manpower can be hired for the manufacturing plant.
For the utilities part, Kerteh, Terengganu was again leading with higher mark
since it has multiple sources of power and water supply when compared to Sipitang,
Sabah and Gurun, Kedah. For land availability perspective, Kerteh, Terengganu
offering the cheapest land price per sqft with only RM 18 than Gurun, Kedah with RM
22.96 per sqft and Sipitang, Sabah, with land price of RM 48 per sqft. After comparing
each aspect and calculating the marks obtained for each location, Kerteh, Terengganu
was leading with total mark of 3 followed by Gurun, Kedah and Sipitang, Sabah with
score of 2.4 and 2 respectively. Therefore, it can be decided that the finalized location
chose for the production plant is at Kerteh, Terengganu.
18
CHAPTER 2
PROCESS SYNTHESIS
In the process route selection, three different types of process route will be
proposed for the production of ACN. It is ammoxidation of propane, ammoxidation of
propylene and nitrilation from ethyl acrylate.
This section includes gross profit margin calculations for each of the three
types of the processes which are ammoxidation of propylene, ammoxidation of
propane and nitrilation of ethyl acrylate (EA).
I. Ammoxidation of Propylene
kg/mol 1 1 3/2 1 3
19
Gross Profit = 10.44(1) + 0 – 4.07(0.79) – 3.30(0.32) – 0 = 6.17 MYR/kg
kg/mol 1 1 2 1 4
kg/mol 1 1 1 1 1
20
2.1.2 Technology Comparison
In the process route selection, three different reaction routes had been proposed as a route for ACN production. There are ammoxidation of
propane, ammoxidation of propylene and nitrilation of ethyl acrylate. The three-process route has been compared in Table 2.1 in term of process
description, process condition, environmental aspect, economy aspect, safety and selectivity of the production.
Process This ammoxidation process is a The reaction can be achieved by The reaction can be achieved via the
Description catalytic conversion of propane and combining propylene, ammonia and nitrilation of ethyl acrylate with
ammonia in the presence of oxygen oxygen together in the presence of a ammonia over an inexpensive titanium
to produce ACN. (Propane Process fixed catalytic bed. Bismuth molybdate dioxide solid acid catalyst (Karp et al.,
Boost to Acrylonitrile Production | catalyst is an effective catalyst for this 2017).
ICIS, n.d.). reaction (Licht et al., 2016a).
21
Process Propene ammoxidation required Propylene ammoxidation required Ammoxidation of Ethyl Acrylate
Condition a temperature around 500-550 ℃ to 400 ℃ - 500 ℃ to be carried out in this required a temperature of 315 ℃ to be
obtain high conversion (Centi et al., reaction (Sinnott & Towler, 2019). carried out (Karp et al., 2017).
1992).
For the oxidation and The catalyst used for both of the
Sb-V based catalyst are one of ammoxidation of propylene, catalysts reactions is titanium dioxide (TiO )
2
catalysts used for the production based on bismuth molybdates are the (Bagheri et al., 2014).
(Guerrero-Pérez et al., 2006). most efficient and it is an expensive
catalyst (Licht et al., 2016)
Environmental Propane processes apply the This process produces a lot of by- This process only produces water
Aspect gas-phase additives such as products. One of them is hydrogen (H2O), ammonia (NH3), and ethanol as
bromomethane as radical generators cyanide which is chemical hazardous to the by-products, where ammonia and
which are not good for the environment. alcohol can be recycled back into the
environmental concern since it will reactor while water can be released as
affect to the thinning of ozone layer The production of ACN by wastewater and treated. There are no
(Guerrero-Pérez et al., 2006). propylene ammoxidation also produces toxic chemicals released from this
carbon dioxide which can lead to process, therefore, less environmental
carbon dioxide emissions and issues will occur.
greenhouse gas emissions (Isabel
Segarra Trevino, 2019).
Economic The gross profit margin is According to the IHS Market Highest gross profit margin value
Aspect calculated to be around RM 6.99/kg Chemical Economics Handbook which is around RM 7.18/kg. This is
22
since the cost of raw material, (2019), Propylene is the second largest due to the cheaper price of glycerol-
propane per kg is about RM 1 chemical produced worldwide. based component that is used as the raw
cheaper than propylene. Relatively low gross profit margin material in this process which is ethyl
value which is around RM 6.17. acrylate.
Safety It is discovered that there may Propylene will be used as a raw As the raw material which is the
be a slightly higher production of material in this method, corrosion will ethyl acrylate is from glycerol, it poses
hydrogen cyanide in the propane occur, resulting in hydrogen cyanide. less environmental issues. Ethyl
process (Propane Process Boost to The use of oxygen by the body is acrylate is a naturally occurring
Acrylonitrile Production | ICIS, hampered by hydrogen cyanide, which chemical and non-toxic (Jers et al.,
n.d.). Hydrogen cyanide is an can affect the brain, heart, blood 2019), so the effluents generated also
extremely poisonous substance that vessels, and lungs. Exposure has the do contain less harmful materials.
can lead to fatality if prolonged potential to be fatal (Isabel Segarra Hence, it is safe for the environment.
exposure. Trevino, 2019)
Conversion Yield of propane to ACN is The yield of the product is 82 % The yield of the product will be
Yield of Product about 40% (Centi et al., 1992). (Dimian & Bildea, 2008). 98% (Karp et al., 2017).
23
2.1.3 Ammoxidation of Propane
For this reaction route, it is a direct one-stage propane conversion to ACN. This
propane ammoxidation reaction is an exothermic reaction with the approximated heat
released up to 631 kJ/mol. The process is quite similar with the ammoxidation of
propylene process route. It is conducted in the fluidized-bed reactor with the
temperature range of 500 to 550 ℃, slightly higher temperature than the standard
SOHIO process (Cespi et al., 2014). It is discovered that there may be a slightly higher
production of hydrogen cyanide in the propane process (Propane Process Boost to
Acrylonitrile Production | ICIS, n.d.).
24
2.1.4 Ammoxidation of Propylene
The production of ACN from ethyl acrylate can be achieved via nitrilation
process of ethyl acrylate with ammonia. This reaction is being done in the presence of
an inexpensive catalyst which is titanium dioxide (TiO2). This endothermic approach
eliminates runaway reaction hazards and achieves higher yields than the standard
25
propylene ammoxidation process. Avoidance of hydrogen cyanide as a by-product also
improves safety and mitigates product handling requirements. This process has high
conversion yield which is 98% (Karp et al., 2017). The chemical equation of this
process is stated below.
Nitrilation Reaction:
26
2.2 Block Flow Diagram for Selected Process Route
Safety has been highlighted as a core factor for maintaining public support
starting from a specific location to global. Global issues embrace for renewable energy
and climate change mitigation while specific location issues for air and water
pollution, soil quality, and soil erosion (Ghosh et al., 2019). The use of 3-HP in the
production of ACN has released ethanol as their by-products instead of hydrogen
cyanide from the production of ACN using propylene. By avoiding hydrogen cyanide
(HCN) as a by-product, the process is safer and product handling needs are reduced.
The mixture of propylene, ammonia and oxygen in a reactor has produced ACN as
their main products and acetonitrile and HCN as their by-products. Cyanides enter the
environment as a result of pollution, and they can harm living creatures in a variety of
ways (Jaszczak et al., 2017).
27
2.3.2 Economic of Acrylonitrile Production
Rezaie, Pirouzfar, and Alihosseini (2020) state that ACN is the most important
industrial product, with increasing demand, indicating that there is a gap between
supply and demand in the country for the future according to daily statistics with no
chance of expanding if there are several production units. According to Langvart
(2011), one of the raw materials used to make ACN which is ammonia is extremely
hazardous materials that must be handled, stored, and transported in a safe manner.
I. Ammonia
Alongside with nitrogen dioxides, ammonia is a major source of nitrogen
pollution. The influence of nitrogen accumulation on plant species diversity and
composition within impacted ecosystems is a key effect of ammonia pollution on
28
biodiversity. Ammonia pollution affects species composition through acidifying soils,
causing direct toxic damage to leave, and modifying plant vulnerability to frost,
drought, and pathogens. In the worst-case scenario, sensitive and iconic habitats may
be lost (Giannakis et al., 2019). However, ammonia also has many benefits that can
preserve the environment. For example, ammonia can be used as a basic building block
for ammonium nitrate fertilizer, which releases nitrogen, as essential nutrient for
growing plants, including farm crops and lawns (Ammonia Uses and Benefits |
Chemical Safety Facts, n.d.).
II. Acrylonitrile
ACN was declared toxic by the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999
(CEPA 1999) in 2000 because of its potential to harm human health. ACN is
considered toxic to human health because of its potential to cause cancer. ACN was
shown to have no negative effects on the environment or biological diversity
(Environment and Climate Change Canada - Canada.Ca, n.d.). People are mostly
exposed to ACN through the air, and the levels in outdoor air are usually so low that
they are below the detection limit. Meanwhile, near industrial point sources,
environmental exposure to ACN in the air is likely to be the highest. In order to help
ensuring the emission of acrylonitrile is reduced, Environment Canada require
synthetic rubber manufactures that use and release ACN to the environment to prepare
and implement Pollution Prevention Plans in accordance with Part 4 of the Canadian
Environmental Act, 1999 (Long et al., 2002).
III. Ethanol
29
becoming a serious industrial toxin (Log & Moi, 2018). According to U.S. Energy
Information Administration (2018), pure ethanol is non-toxic and biodegradable, and
it quickly breaks down into harmless substances if spilled. So, as overall, ethanol is
considered to be better for the environment compared to other chemicals as it does not
cause a huge problem to the environment.
The circular economy (CE) aims to transform the current predominantly linear
economic model (take, make, waste) into a system that minimises disposal. Raw
materials are extracted (or grown), processed, combined, sold, distributed, sold again,
used, and finally disposed of in the linear economy. A CE must find alternative uses
for all potential material losses, as well as embodied energy and workforce (Klein et
al., 2020)
Figure 2.3 Comparison between linear economy and circular economy (Sources:
Towards Zero Waste).
30
same with all the living things on Earth. Hence, a CE could help this concern
(Jusakulvijit et al., 2021)
The Ethyl Acrylate has been used to produce ACN in this project. The Ethyl
Acrylate can be produced from various renewable resources. This shows that it was
implemented with the concept of CE as the Ethyl Acrylate was recycled from a
glycerol and recycling is a necessary component of a CE itself. According to Wright
(2019), the CE concept for human production and consumption 'renew, remake, and
share’ has been widely quoted as an alternative to the traditional linear concept 'take,
make, and dispose' to reduce resource input, waste, emissions, and energy leakage
through the principles of reduce, remanufacture, repair, renew, reuse, and recycle.
In the reaction, the ethanol and ammonia are being released again after the
reaction because both ethanol and ammonia are the excess reactants in the reaction.
So, rather than releasing the ethanol and ammonia into the wastewater, selling them to
other company that use lower composition of the substances is one way to obey the
concept of circular economy
31
2.3.6 Net Zero Carbon
In this process synthesis, the nitrilation process of ethyl acrylate and ammonia
produces ACN which is the main product, ethanol, water, and excess ammonia. These
products are then separated, and ammonia can be recycled back into the reactor or be
retreated and sell off. At the end of this reaction, only ethanol and water are released,
and they can be treated as wastewater. There are no greenhouse gases especially carbon
dioxide that can cause global warming or climate change released from this reaction.
However, we are aware that carbon emission can still occur throughout the process
because of the electricity that we used, but this carbon emission can be lessen as we
are using raw material that is produced from a renewable resource which is biomass
(Reducing Chemical Manufacturing Carbon Emissions | Nibusinessinfo.Co.Uk, n.d.).
32
2.4 Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia
This chapter will discuss regarding the process flow of the production of
acrylonitrile from ammonia. In this process, there are five major unit operation
involved which is Fluidized bed reactor, two flash columns, one distillation column
and one absorption column.
33
2.4.1 Process Flow Diagram
Equipment Tag P-101 P-101 E-101 E-102 R-101 E-103 V-101 E-104 C-101 C-102 E-105 V-102
Flash
Equipment Name Ammonia Pump Ethyl Acrylate Pump Ammonia Heater Ethyl Acrylate Heater Fixed Bed Reactor Acrylonitrile Cooler Flash Separator Acrylonitrile Cooler Distillation Column Absorption Column Acrylonitrile Cooler
Separator
Stream ID S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 S17 S18 S19
Temperature (℃ -40 -40 310 70 70 310 310 45 45 45 25 90.82 123.96 70 70 70 25 25 25
Pressure (bar) 1 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
Phase Liquid Liquid Vapour Liquid Liquid Vapour Vapour Mixed Vapour Liquid Liquid Vapour Liquid Liquid Liquid Vapour Mixed Vapour Liquid
Mass Flow Rate (kg/hr)
Ammonia 6000 6000 6000 0 0 0 3720 3720 3719.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0 0 0 0.4 0.4 0.4009 0 CRYLON SDN BHD
Ethyl Acrylate 0 0 0 14000 14000 14000 596.98 596.98 2.03 594.95 594.95 5.95 589 0 0 5.95 5.95 0.0224 5.9271
PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM PRODUCTION
Acrylonitrile 0 0 0 0 0 0 7103.33 7103.33 71.03 7032.3 7032.3 7005.75 26.54 0 0 7005.75 7005.75 70.0575 6935.6984 OF ACRYLONITRILE FROM AMMONIA
Water 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2411.77 2411.77 4.45 2407.32 2407.32 12.42 2394.90 0.00 0.00 12.42 12.42 0.03 12.39
SIZE DRAWING NO. SHEE1T
Ethanol 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6167.55 6167.55 29.22 6138.33 6138.33 6102.30 36.03 0.00 5797.18 305.11 305.11 1.77 303.35
Dimethyl Sulfoxide 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 10000.00 10000.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 A4 AN 2022 1 OF 1
Total 6000 6000 6000 14000 14000 14000 20000 20000 3826.33 16173.3 16173.3 13126.819 3046.47 10000 15797.18 7329.63 7329.63 72.2782 7257.3615
34
2.4.2 Process Description
Figure 2.4 shows the process flow diagram for the selected process route,
which is nitrilation of ethyl acrylate. In this process, the ammonia and ethyl acrylate,
as the raw material will entered via stream 1 and stream 4 respectively. Since both of
the raw material are in liquid form initially, both of the inlet stream is equipped with
pump, P-101 and P-102 to increase the pressure into 4 bar. Then, the stream is
equipped with heater, E-101 and E-102 to increase the temperature up to 310℃. The
reactant entered the Fluidized bed reactor, R-101 in form of gas phase to undergo the
nitrilation process to be converted into ACN, ethanol and water. The reaction will
occur in the presence of Titanium Dioxide (TiO2 ) as the catalyst. This reaction needs
to be done in the condition of high temperature and pressure, with the temperature up
to 310℃ and pressure of 4 bar. Since the process cannot achieve the 100% conversion,
the excess ammonia and ethyl acrylate are expected to be exist in the output S7.
From S7, the output mixture in vapour form will be cooled by the cooler, E-
103 to obtain the mixed phase component. Then it will go to the flash column, F-101
to separate the component mixture from the excess ammonia gas. Then, the component
consist of ethanol, ACN, water and ethyl acrylate will be cooled by E-104 before
entering the distillation column, C-101 to separate the water and ethyl acrylate from
the mixture. The mixture left then will enter the absorption column, C-102 in vapour
phase to separate the ethanol from the mixture ACN and some excess ammonia that
still exist in the stream. The gas mixture left with ACN and ammonia will be cooled
by cooler, E-105 to convert the gas phase into mixed phase. Lastly, the mixture that
consist of mixed phase will entered the flash column, F-102 to separate the excess
ammonia from ACN. This final step of separation is important to obtain high purity of
ACN. Lastly, the final product ACN is obtained.
35
2.4.3 Chemical Reaction
This process is carried by reacting the raw material, ethyl acrylate with
ammonia through the nitrilation process. This reaction required to be carried in high
pressure and temperature. This reaction also required the presence of Titanium Dioxide
(TiO2) to improve the effectiveness of the reaction. Nitrilation of ethyl acrylate
reaction was carried out in the Fluidized bed reactor with the chemical equation;
36
commercial applications use turbulent fluidized beds (TFBs) and circulation fluidized
beds (CFBs) (Grace, 2000). Despite their benefits, TFBs and CFBs have several
disadvantages.
Figure 2.5 Fluidized bed reactor modes (Sinnott & Towler, 2019)
37
Figure 2.6 Circulating fluidized bed reactor (CFBs) (Chemical Engineering
World, n.d.)
The Nitrilation of EA and ammonia is carried out in the Fluidized bed reactor
using the titanium dioxide (TiO2) according to the following irreversible equation:
38
𝐂𝟓 𝐇𝟖 𝐎𝟐 + 𝐍𝐇𝟑 → 𝐂𝟑 𝐇𝟑 𝐍 + 𝐂𝟐 𝐇𝟓 𝐎𝐇 + 𝐇𝟐 𝐎
The suitable operating condition and assumption for the reactor is summarized
in Table 2.2.
Where;
39
Accumulation : The total build-up within the system
For the continuous processes at steady state, accumulation is equal to zero and
since it is a non-reactive species, the generation and consumption will be equal to zero
as well. Therefore, the equation can be simplified to:
𝑰𝒏𝒑𝒖𝒕 = 𝑶𝒖𝒕𝒑𝒖𝒕
The extent of reaction is used to find mole flowrate of the component in the
feed and outlet stream. For the continuous process at steady state, the equation to find
the extent of reaction is stated below.
𝒏𝒊 = 𝒏𝒊𝟎 + 𝒗𝒊 𝝃
Where;
40
𝜉 : extent of reaction
After that, the mass flowrate of the component can be obtained using the
equation below.
Process design uses energy balance to determine the amount of energy that
flows in or out of each process unit whether the energy must be added or removed
from the system. The general energy balance is stated below.
The shift in enthalpy over the activity of the equipment and the heat flow for
each stream were computed to evaluate the energy balance in the reactor phase by
applying certain assumptions, including:
• The system obeys the law of energy conversion in which Ein – Eout = Eaccumulated.
The main references for the energy balance calculation are obtained from
Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 8th Edition (Green & Perry, 2008) and Yaws’
41
Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds
(Yaws, 2003) respectively.
The heat capacities of inorganic and organic liquid are calculated using the
formula below. From Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook.
𝑻
𝑻 𝑪𝟐𝑻𝟐 𝑪𝟑𝑻𝟑 𝑪𝟒𝑻𝟒 𝑪𝟓𝑻𝟓
After integration ∫𝟐𝟗𝟖⋅𝟏𝟓 𝑪𝑷 𝒅𝑻 = [𝑪𝟏𝑻 + 𝟐
+ 𝟑
+ 𝟒
+ 𝟓
]
𝟐𝟗𝟖⋅𝟏𝟓
𝒕 = 𝟏 − 𝑻𝒓
𝑻
𝑻𝒓 =
𝑻𝒄
𝑻
𝑻 𝑩𝑻𝟐 𝑪𝑻𝟑 𝑫𝑻𝟒
After integration ∫𝟐𝟗𝟖⋅𝟏𝟓 𝑪𝑷 𝒅𝑻 = [𝑨𝑻 + 𝟐
+ 𝟑
+ 𝟒
]
𝟐𝟗𝟖⋅𝟏𝟓
The heat capacities of inorganic and organic in the ideal gas state are calculated
using the formula below.
42
2 2
𝐶3 𝐶5
𝐶𝑝𝐺 = 𝐶𝐼 + 𝐶2 [ 𝑇 ] + 𝐶4 [ 𝑇 ]
𝐶3 𝐶5
𝑠𝑖𝑛ℎ ( 𝑇 ) 𝑐𝑜𝑠ℎ ( 𝑇 )
After integration
𝑻
𝑻
𝑪𝟑 𝑻
∫ 𝑪𝒑 𝒅𝑻 = [𝑪𝟏𝑻] 𝟐𝟗𝟖.𝟏𝟓 + 𝑪𝟐𝑪𝟑 [𝒄𝒐𝒕𝒉 ( )]
𝟐𝟗𝟖⋅𝟏𝟓 𝑻 𝟐𝟗𝟖.𝟏𝟓
𝑪𝟓 𝑻
− 𝑪𝟒𝑪𝟓 [𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒉 ( )]
𝑻 𝟐𝟗𝟖.𝟏𝟓
𝑇
𝑇 𝐵𝑇 2 𝐶𝑇 3 𝐷𝑇 4 𝐸𝑇 5
After integration ∫298⋅15 𝐶𝑃 ⅆ𝑇 = [𝐴𝑇 + 2
+
3
+
4
+
5
]
298⋅15
The specific enthalpy change of each substance was determined by using the
temperature range based on the below:
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
∫ 𝐶𝑝 𝑑𝑇 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡) + ∆𝐻𝑓@𝑟𝑒𝑓
𝑇1
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
∫ 𝐶𝑝 𝑑𝑇 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡) + ∆𝐻𝑓@𝑟𝑒𝑓
𝑇2
Where;
43
T2: Temperature outlet
The heat duty each unit process for non-reactive unit process is the net heat
change in the enthalpy flowrate was calculated using equation:
𝑄 = 𝐻𝑇,𝑜𝑢𝑡 − 𝐻𝑇,𝑖𝑛
Where;
Q : Heat duty
𝑯𝒇 = 𝑨 + 𝑩𝑻 + 𝑪𝑻𝟐
Where;
T : Temperature (K)
44
𝐻̇𝑖 = 𝑛𝑖 × 𝐻𝑖
Where;
The flash column seen in Figure 2.6 is one of the simplest separation methods.
The multi-component liquid stream is partially vaporized in a flash drum at a specific
pressure and temperature. A flash drum is essentially a single stage with a heater and
valve. Typically, the heater raises the temperature and enthalpy of the mixture, while
the valve lowers the pressure. This creates two phases: the vapor phase, which is
enriched with the more volatile components, and the liquid phase, which is enhanced
with the less volatile features and partly vaporized in the flash drum. The components
of feed are classified based on their relative volatility. If the constituents are more
volatile, it is referred to as a light key; if they are less volatile, it is referred to as a
heavy key. Figure 2.7 shows the schematic diagram of a flash column (F-101 and F-
102). In chemical facilities, the flash separation assembly performs a simple separation
operation before performing more complex separation processes.
45
Figure 2.7 Flash column
Water 100
Ethyl-acrylate 99.6
Ethanol 78
Acrylonitrile 77
Ammonia -35
46
The method for manual mass balance calculation of the multicomponent flash
separation as stated below. The first step is by finding the partial vapour pressure of
each component inside the flash drum by using equation below:
𝐵
log 𝑃 ∘ 𝑘 = 𝐴 −
𝐶+𝑇
Where;
The Raoult’s law is used to assume the system is in ideal, whereby the relative
volatility,
𝑝𝑖
𝛼𝑖⁄ =
𝑘 𝑝𝑘
Where;
47
𝑝𝑘 = vapour pressure of the heavy key component
As for the calculation procedure for the split fraction of the components, 𝜀in
the stream, short-cut multi-component distillation method using equation below the
split fraction for light key and heavy key can be calculated using formula below:
𝛼𝑖⁄ (𝜉𝑛 )
𝑘
𝜉𝑘 =
1 + (𝛼𝑖⁄ − 1)(𝜉𝑛 )
𝑘
Where;
The molar flow rate of each component at the top stream was calculated using
the formula as below:
𝜈𝑘 = 𝜉𝑘 × 𝑛
Where;
The mole fraction, 𝑦𝑘 of each component in the top stream was calculated using
the formula below:
48
𝜈𝑘
𝑦𝑘 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝜈𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠
The molar flow rate of the bottom stream component was lk which was
calculated by using the formula below:
𝑙𝑘 = 𝑛 − 𝑣𝑘
𝑙𝑘
𝑥𝑘 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑘 𝑙𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠
In order to calculate energy balance for the flash column, all information
including temperature, states and pressure for each stream need to be determined
beforehand. The method for manual mass balance calculation of the multicomponent
flash separation as stated below.
Where;
T = Temperature (K)
49
Heat of vaporization involved in phase change can be calculated using the
formula below.
𝐻𝑣𝑎𝑝 = A (1 − T/Tc)^n
Where;
T = Temperature (K)
𝐻𝑓 = A + BT + CT^2
Where;
T = Temperature (K)
The enthalpy flow rate of the component is calculated by using the equation
below.
Ḣ 𝑖 = ni × H i
Where;
50
Ḣ𝑖 =enthalpy flow rate of component (kJ/hr)
△ Ḣ = ∑ Ḣ𝑜𝑢𝑡 − Ḣ𝑖𝑛
Where;
To recover all the ammonia vapour from the mixture of acrylonitrile, ethyl
acrylate, ethanol and water, the flash column (F-101) is being used to recover all the
ammonia from the mixture before the mixture entering the distillation column (C-101).
The temperature of F-101 is kept constant at 45 ℃ and the pressure was at 2 bar. The
operating conditions are shown in Table 2.4 and Table 2.5
Temperature 10
51
Split Fraction of heavy key (𝝃hk) 0.01
Temperature 25
52
Figure 2.8 Distillation Column
In the distillation column, the feed will enter in the middle of the column with
33 trays and two streams at the top and bottom will leave separated acrylonitrile (ACN)
and ethanol from the mixture. ACN is our desired product, it is better for the ACN to
become light key of the mixtures. The conditions that used for this distillation column
is as in the table 2.6 below.
Pressure (bar) 2 2 2
Assumptions:
53
4. Light key component is Ethanol
For multicomponent system which can be considered ideal, Raoult’s law can
be used to determine the composition of the vapour in equilibrium with the liquid.
𝑃𝑖 = 𝑃𝑖 𝑥𝑖
𝑃𝑖
𝑦𝑖 = 𝑥
𝑃 𝑖
𝑦𝑖 = 𝑘𝑖 𝑥𝑖
Where;
𝐵
𝑙𝑜𝑔10 𝑃 = 𝐴 −
(𝑇 + 𝐶)
Where;
T = temperature (C)
54
The relative volatility was calculated using the formula as below:
𝑝𝑖
𝛼𝑖⁄ =
𝑘 𝑝𝑘
Where;
𝛼𝑖⁄ (𝜉𝑛 )
𝑘
𝜉𝑘 =
1 + (𝛼𝑖⁄ − 1)(𝜉𝑛 )
𝑘
Where;
The molar flow rate of each component at the distillate stream was calculated
using the formula as below:
𝑣𝑘 = 𝜉𝑘 × 𝑛
55
Where;
The mole fraction, 𝑦𝑘 of each distillate component was calculated using the
formula as below:
𝜈𝑘
𝑦𝑘 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝜈𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠
The molar flow rate of the bottom stream component was lk which was
calculated by using the formula below:
𝑙𝑘 = 𝑛 − 𝑣𝑘
𝑙𝑘
𝑥𝑘 =
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑘 𝑙𝑘 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠
𝑦 𝑥
log (𝑦 𝐿𝐾 )𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒 (𝑥 𝐿𝐾 )𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚
𝐻𝐾 𝐻𝐾
𝑁𝑚 =
log 𝛼𝐿𝐾
Where;
56
𝑥𝐿𝐾= mole fraction of the light key
𝛼𝑖 𝑥𝑖,𝑑
𝑅𝑚 + 1 = ∑
𝛼𝑖 − 𝜃
Where;
𝜃 is the Underwood Constant and can be calculated as the root of the following
equation.
𝛼𝑖 𝑥𝑖,𝑓
1−𝑞 =∑
𝛼𝑖 − 𝜃
Where; 1<𝜃<𝑎𝐿𝐾
As the feed stream entering the distillation column is liquid stream with a vapor
fraction of 0, which is a saturated liquid, therefore q can be substituted with 1.
𝑅 − 𝑅𝑚
𝑋=
𝑅+1
57
𝑁 − 𝑁𝑚 1 + 54.4𝑋 𝑋 − 1
𝑌= = 1 − exp [( )( )
𝑁+1 11 + 117.2𝑋 𝑋 0.5
The estimate feed plate location can be calculated by the formula below:
𝑁𝑒 𝑥𝐻𝐾,𝐹 𝐵 𝑥𝐿𝐾,𝐵 2
𝑙𝑜𝑔 = 0.206 log[( )( )( ) ]
𝑁𝑠 𝑥𝐿𝐾,𝐹 𝐷 𝑥𝐻𝐾,𝐷
Where;
Bubble point and dew point can be calculated by the formula below by trial
and error.
𝑁𝐶 𝑁𝐶
∑ 𝑦𝑖 = ∑ 𝐾𝑖 𝑥𝑖 = 1.0
𝑖−=1 𝑖−=1
𝑁𝐶 𝑁𝐶 𝑦𝑖
∑ 𝑥𝑖 = ∑ = 1.0
𝑖−=1 𝑖−=1 𝐾𝑖
The method for manual energy balance calculation of the distillation column is
stated below. According to the first law of thermodynamics, the change in the internal
energy of a system is equal to the heat added into the system minus the work down by
the system. By referring to the Yaws's Chemical Properties Handbook 1999, specific
58
heat capacity, specific enthalpy, enthalpy flow rate and enthalpy change of each
component can be calculated. Specific heat capacity of each gas state component can
be calculated by using the formula below.
Where;
T = Temperature (K)
Specific heat capacity of each liquid state component can be calculated using
the formula below.
T = Temperature (K)
𝐻𝑣𝑎𝑝 = A (1 − T/Tc)^n
59
Where;
T = Temperature (K)
𝐻𝑓 = A + BT + CT^2
Where;
T = Temperature (K)
The enthalpy flow rate of the component is calculated by using the equation
below.
Ḣ𝑖 = ni × Hi
Where;
60
The enthalpy change across the extractive distillation column is calculated
using the equation below.
△ Ḣ = ∑ Ḣ𝑜𝑢𝑡 − Ḣ𝑖𝑛
Where;
61
It is usually carried out in vertical counter current columns, as shown in Figure
2.9. The vapour mixture will enter from the bottom inlet, and the liquid solvent will be
fed into the system from the top of the absorption columns. Then, the vapour mixture
will start to float upwards and the liquid solvent will flow downward, respectively.
The impurities or absorbed components from the vapour mixtures will be washed out
by the liquid solvent and flow downward into the bottom of the absorption column in
liquid solution. The clean vapour then flows upwards into the top outlet of the
absorption columns.
In this chemical plant, absorption columns have been used to separate the
acrylonitrile from the vapour mixture of ethanol, acrylonitrile, water, ethyl acrylate
and ammonia as acrylonitrile is the main products in our process. Dimethyl sulfoxide
has been used as liquid solvent to absorb the ethanol from the mixtures. After the
separation process, acrylonitrile will flow upwards in vapour phase while ethanol will
be flow downwards with solvent as liquid solution. The absorption columns take place
at 1 atm with temperature of 350.95 K. The boiling points of the components at the
standard temperature were listed in Table 2.7.
Water 373.2
Ammonia 239.8
62
In mass balance calculation for absorption column, the partial vapour pressure
of each component has been calculated by using equation below:
𝐶2
ln 𝑃 = 𝐶1 + + 𝐶3 ln 𝑇 + 𝐶4 𝑇 𝐶5
𝑇
Where;
Next, the input flowrate of vapour mixture, liquid solvent, mole fraction of
vapour mixture, percentage of impurities absorbed was assumed in this process. Some
other assumption has been set in this process such as;
II. the gas and liquid flow rates are constant throughout the column,
III. the sections were assumed to be well mixed in the liquid and vapor
phases, and
63
Then, the mass balance was conducted accordingly. The total overall balance
on all stages is;
𝐿𝑂 + 𝑉𝑁+1 = 𝐿𝑁 + 𝑉1 = 𝑀
Where;
𝑀= total flow;
Where;
The number of theoretical stages had been calculated by using graph. The
equilibrium line is plotted related to the compositions of two streams leaving in
equilibrium with each other. The equilibrium line of the graph has been set by using
equation y=1.5x, where the m=1.5 has been assumed as ethanol substances did not
cover in Henry’s Law constant. The operating line also was set by using slope equation
𝐿𝑛
⁄𝑉 of the absorption columns. Hence, straight operating line was obtained as the
𝑛+1
slope was nearly constant. After both lines has been set, the number of theoretical
stages was counted respectively. Figure 2.10 shows the theoretical stage of absorption
64
column that obtain from graph. Number of theoretical stages obtained is
4.902662804≅5.
For energy balance, all information for each stream, including temperature,
states, and pressure, must be known it can be calculated. The procedure for manually
calculating the energy balance of an absorption column is stated below.
Specific heat capacities of liquids and gas can be calculated by using the
formula below;
𝑖𝑔
𝐶𝑃 ⁄ 2 −2
𝑅 = 𝐴 + 𝐵𝑇 + 𝐶𝑇 + 𝐷𝑇
Where;
𝑖𝑔
𝐶𝑃 = Specific heat capacity of component (J/mol. K)
65
𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶 and 𝐷 = constants (J/mol.K)
𝑇 = Temperature (K)
Some other assumption has been set in this process to evaluate the energy
balance in the absorption column such as;
The system obeys the law of energy conservation in which Ein− Eout =
Eaccumulated.
2.5.5 Auxiliary
Auxiliary equipment is the equipment that are added into the production line
in order to ensure the smoothness of the process. The auxiliary equipment is a non-
reactive reaction which mean, the value of component that goes into the equipment
will have the same value at the output. In the production of acrylonitrile from
ammonia, several auxiliary equipment has been included in the process which is
cooler, heater and pump
2.5.5.1 Cooler
66
cooler that was applied to change the gas phase of acrylonitrile into the liquid phase
throughout the production line which is E-103, E-104, and E-105. The cooler E-103
was used to change the gas phase of the output from the reactor into the mixed phase
before entering the flash column. Cooler E-104 was used to reduce the temperature
before entering the distillation column while E-105 was used to change the phase of
the gas phase from the output of absorption column into mixed phase before entering
the flash column.
(℃)
Pressure 3 3 3 2 1 1
(bar)
2.5.5.2 Heater
The heater is an equipment to that been used in the production line to increase
the temperature of the component inside the stream. It is also able to changes the phase
of the component from the liquid phase into gas phase. In this process, the heater was
required to increase the temperature of the raw material, ammonia and ethyl acrylate
67
before entering the fluidized bed reactor. In this production line, there are two heater
that been applied in the process which is heater E-101 and E-102. Heater E-101 is used
to increase the temperature of ammonia before entering the fluidized bed reactor.
Heater E-102 is used to increase the temperature of ethyl acrylate before entering the
fluidized bed reactor. Figure 2.12. and Table 2.9. shows the heater and the operating
condition of the heater.
(℃)
Pressure 4 4 4 4
(bar)
2.5.5.3 Pump
Pump is the equipment that is used to increase the pressure of the component
in the stream. Pump only can increase the pressure of the component that is in liquid
phase. In this process, the pump P-101 is used to increase the pressure of ammonia
stream from 1 bar into 4 bar. The pump P-102 is used to increase the pressure of ethyl
acrylate from 1 bar into 4 bar.
68
Figure 2.13 The pump (P-101, P-102)
(℃)
Pressure 1 4 1 4
(bar)
This section will display the results of a manual mass and energy balance
calculation. Below are the equations for each type of equipment.
69
Where;
Figure 2.14 depicts the pump symbol, P-101, and Table 2.11 depicts the mass
balance on pump.
Pressure (bar) 1 4
70
Component Mass flow rate (kg/hr)
Ethyl acrylate 0 0
Acrylonitrile 0 0
Ethanol 0 0
Water 0 0
Figure 2.15 depicts the pump symbol, P-101, and Table 2.12 depicts the mass
balance on pump.
Temperature (°C) 70 70
Pressure (bar) 1 4
Ammonia 0 0
71
Acrylonitrile 0 0
Ethanol 0 0
Water 0 0
Figure 2.16 depicts the heater symbol, E-101, and Table 2.13 depicts the mass
balance on heater.
Pressure (bar) 4 4
Ethyl acrylate 0 0
Acrylonitrile 0 0
Ethanol 0 0
Water 0 0
72
Total 6000 6000
Figure 2.17 depicts the heater symbol, E-102, and Table 2.14 depicts the mass
balance on heater.
Pressure (bar) 4 4
Ammonia 0 0
Acrylonitrile 0 0
Ethanol 0 0
Water 0 0
73
2.6.1.5 Fluidized bed Reactor (R-101)
Figure 2.18 depicts the fluidized bed reactor symbol, R-101, and Table 2.15
depicts the mass balance on Fluidized bed Reactor.
Pressure (bar) 4 4 3
Acrylonitrile 0 0 7103.3292
Ethanol 0 0 6167.5533
Water 0 0 2411.7690
Figure 2.19 depicts the Cooler symbol, E-103, and Table 2.16 depicts the mass
balance on Cooler.
74
Figure 2.19 Symbol of Cooler (E-103)
Pressure (bar) 4 4
Figure 2.20 depicts the Flash column symbol, F-101, and Table 2.17 depicts
the mass balance on Flash column.
75
Figure 2.20 Symbol of Flash column (F-101)
Temperature (°C) 10 45 45
Pressure (bar) 3 3 3
Figure 2.21 depicts the cooler symbol, E-104, and Table 2.18 depicts the mass
balance on Cooler.
76
Figure 2.21 Symbol of cooler (E-104)
Temperature (°C) 45 25
Pressure (bar) 3 4
Figure 2.22 depicts the Distillation Column symbol, C-101, and Table 2.19
depicts the mass balance on Distillation Column.
77
Figure 2.22 Symbol of Distillation Column (C-101)
Pressure (bar) 2 2 2
Figure 2.23 depicts the absorption column symbol, C-102, and Table 2.20
depicts the mass balance on absorption column.
78
Figure 2.23 Symbol of absorption column (C-102)
Temperature (°C) 70 70 70 70
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1 1
Figure 2.24 depicts the cooler, E-105, and Table 2.21 depicts the mass balance
on cooler.
79
Figure 2.24 Symbol of cooler (E-105)
Temperature (°C) 90 25
Pressure (bar) 1 1
DMSO 0 0
Figure 2.25 depicts the flash column, F-102, and Table 2.22 depicts the mass
balance on flash column.
80
Figure 2.25 Symbol of flash column (F-102)
Temperature (°C) 25 25 25
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1
Process design uses energy balance to determine the amount of energy that
flows in or out of each process unit whether the energy must be added or removed
from the system. The general energy balance is stated below.
81
Rate of energy accumulatio
= Rate of energy entering system by inflow
− Rate of energy leaving the system by outflow
+ Rate of heat aⅆⅆeⅆ tosystem + Rate of work ⅆone on system
The shift in enthalpy over the activity of the equipment and the heat flow for
each stream were computed to evaluate the energy balance in the reactor phase by
applying certain assumptions, including:
The shift in enthalpy over the activity of the equipment and the heat flow for
each stream were computed to evaluate the energy balance in the reactor phase by
applying certain assumptions, including:
i. The system obeys the law of energy conversion in which Ein – Eout =
Accumulated.
iii. The kinetic energy and potential energy are negligible. Thus, the energy
balance is Q = ∆H.
The main references for the energy balance calculation are obtained from
Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, 8th Edition (Green & Perry, 2008) and Yaws’
Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of Chemical Compounds
(Yaws, 2003) respectively.
The heat capacities of inorganic and organic liquid are calculated using the
formula below. From Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook.
82
𝐶𝑝𝐿 = 𝐶1 + 𝐶2𝑇 + 𝐶3𝑇 2 + 𝐶4𝑇 3 + 𝐶5𝑇 4
𝑇
𝑇 𝐶2𝑇 2 𝐶3𝑇 3 𝐶4𝑇 4 𝐶5𝑇 5
After integration ∫298⋅15 𝐶𝑃 𝑑𝑇 = [𝐶1𝑇 + 2
+ 3
+ 4
+ 5
]
298⋅15
𝐶12 2
𝐶32 𝑡 3 𝐶3𝐶4𝑡 4 𝐶42 𝑡 5
𝐶𝑝𝐿 = + 𝐶2 − 2𝐶1𝐶3𝑡 − 𝐶1𝐶4𝑡 − − −
𝑡 3 2 5
𝑡 = 1 − 𝑇𝑟
𝑇
𝑇𝑟 =
𝑇𝑐
𝐶𝑝𝐿 = 𝐴 + 𝐵𝑇 + 𝐶𝑇 2 + 𝐷𝑇 3
𝑇
𝑇 𝐵𝑇 2 𝐶𝑇 3 𝐷𝑇 4
After integration ∫298⋅15 𝐶𝑃 𝑑𝑇 = [𝐴𝑇 + 2
+ 3
+ 4
]
298⋅15
The heat capacities of inorganic and organic in the ideal gas state are calculated
using the formula below.
2 2
𝐶3 𝐶5
𝐶𝑝𝐺 = 𝐶𝐼 + 𝐶2 [ 𝑇 ] + 𝐶4 [ 𝑇 ]
𝐶3 𝐶5
𝑠𝑖𝑛ℎ ( 𝑇 ) 𝑐𝑜𝑠ℎ ( 𝑇 )
83
After integration
𝑇
𝐶3 𝑇 𝐶5 𝑇
∫ 𝐶𝑝 𝑑𝑇 = [𝐶1𝑇]𝑇298.15 + 𝐶2𝐶3 [𝑐𝑜𝑡ℎ ( )] − 𝐶4𝐶5 [𝑡𝑎𝑛ℎ ( )]
298⋅15 𝑇 298.15 𝑇 298.15
𝐶𝑝𝐺 = 𝐴 + 𝐵𝑇 + 𝐶𝑇 2 + 𝐷𝑇 3 + 𝐸𝑇 4
𝑇
𝑇 𝐵𝑇 2 𝐶𝑇 3 𝐷𝑇 4 𝐸𝑇 5
After integration ∫298⋅15 𝐶𝑃 𝑑𝑇 = [𝐴𝑇 + 2
+ 3
+ 4
+ 5
]
298⋅15
The specific enthalpy change of each substance was determined by using the
temperature range based on the below:
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
∫ 𝐶𝑝 𝑑𝑇 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡) + ∆𝐻𝑓@𝑟𝑒𝑓
𝑇1
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
∫ 𝐶𝑝 𝑑𝑇 (𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑛𝑡) + ∆𝐻𝑓@𝑟𝑒𝑓
𝑇2
Where;
The heat duty each unit process for non-reactive unit process is the net heat
change in the enthalpy flowrate was calculated using equation:
84
𝑄 = 𝐻𝑇,𝑜𝑢𝑡 − 𝐻𝑇,𝑖𝑛
Where;
Q : Heat duty
𝐻𝑓 = 𝐴 + 𝐵𝑇 + 𝐶𝑇 2
Where;
T : Temperature (K)
𝐻̇𝑖 = 𝑛𝑖 × 𝐻𝑖
Where;
85
𝐻̇𝑖 : Enthalpy flowrate of the component i (kJ/hr)
Figure 2.26 depicts the pump symbol, P-101, and Table 2.23 depicts the energy
balance on pump.
Pressure (bar) 1 4
ΔH 0
86
2.6.2.2 Pump (P-102)
Figure 2.27 depicts the pump symbol, P-101, and Table 2.24 depicts the energy
balance on pump.
Temperature (°C) 70 70
Pressure (bar) 1 4
ΔH 0
87
2.6.2.3 Heater (E-101)
Figure 2.28 depicts the heater symbol, E-101, and Table 2.25 depicts the energy
balance on heater.
Pressure (bar) 4 4
ΔH 12142988.9550
88
2.6.2.4 Heater (E-102)
Figure 2.29 depicts the heater symbol, E-102, and Table 2.26 depicts the energy
balance on heater.
Pressure (bar) 4 4
ΔH 6216691.8578
89
2.6.2.5 Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101)
Figure 2.30 depicts the fluidized bed reactor symbol, R-101, and Table 2.27
depicts the energy balance on Fluidized Bed Reactor.
Pressure (bar) 4 4 3
Acrylonitrile 0 0 26260886.57
Ethanol 0 0 -28679691.4
Water 0 0 -31389933.74
ΔH 13072153.82
90
2.6.2.6 Cooler (E-103)
Figure 2.31 depicts the Cooler symbol, E-103, and Table 2.28 depicts the
energy balance on Cooler.
Pressure (bar) 4 4
ΔH -24293310.6628
91
2.6.2.7 Flash Column (F-101)
Figure 2.32 depicts the Flash column symbol, F-101, and Table 2.29 depicts
the energy balance on Flash column.
Temperature (°C) 10 45 45
Pressure (bar) 3 3 3
Stream S8 S9 S10
92
Temperature (°C) 10 45 45
Pressure (bar) 3 3 3
ΔH 1697842.8766
Figure 2.33 depicts the cooler symbol, E-104, and Table 2.30 depicts the
energy balance on Cooler.
Temperature (°C) 45 25
Pressure (bar) 3 4
93
Acrylonitrile (LK) 19786770.4164 19495867.5357
ΔH -824883.0980
Figure 2.34 depicts the Distillation Column symbol, C-101, and Table 2.31
depicts the energy balance on Distillation Column.
94
Pressure (bar) 2 2 2
ΔH 7412717099.271
Figure 2.35 depicts the absorption column symbol, C-102, and Table 2.32
depicts the energy balance on absorption column.
95
Phase Vapor Liquid Liquid Vapor
Temperature
(°C) 70 70 70 70
Pressure
(bar) 1 1 1 1
Acrylonitrile
23950675.65 0.00 0.00 23950675.65
(ACN)
Ethyl
-21259.03 0.00 0.00 -21161.69
Acrylate
ΔH -4723468.2262
Figure 2.36 depicts the cooler, E-105, and Table 2.33 depicts the energy
balance on cooler.
96
Table 2.33 Energy balance on cooler (E-105)
Stream S16 S17
Temperature (°C) 90 25
Pressure (bar) 1 1
ΔH -5026079.3855
Figure 2.37 depicts the flash column, F-102, and Table 2.34 depicts the energy
balance on flash column.
97
Figure 2.37 Symbol of flash column (F-102)
Temperature (°C) 25 25 25
Pressure (bar) 1 1 1
ΔH -9368.7170
98
2.7 PRO/II Simulation
ETHANOL Ethanol
ACRN Acrylonitrile
H2O Water
NH3 Ammonia
Table 2.36
List of unit operation used in PRO/II Simulation.
UNIT/STREAM IN UNIT
COMPONENT ICON
PRO/II OPERATIONS
99
Flash column
Flash
(F-101& F-102)
Distillation column
Distillation column
(C-101)
Pump
Pump
(P-101 & P-102)
Heater/Cooler
In this process, with specified mass yield of the reactant and chemical equation,
equilibrium reactor has been selected to the model as a fluidized bed reactor (R-101).
In addition, flash has been selected to model flash columns (F-101 and F-102) for
vapor liquid in equilibrium such that a multicomponent mixtures state present.
Distillation was selected to be the model for distillation column (C-101) and absorption
column (C-102) in this process. Since in the AVEVA PRO II Simulation does not have
100
absorption column, we used the distillation column without the reboiler and condenser
to represent the absorption column that was used in our process.
Lastly, the simple heat exchanger (HX) is used to represent both cooler (E-103,
E-104, E-105) and heater (E-101, E-102) in this process. The simple HX was used to
change the temperature of the process stream whether increase or to lower down the
temperature of that process stream. The pressure change used in this process is pump.
The pump was used to make sure that the liquid will be transported during the process
and at the same time to increase the pressure.
101
Figure 2.38 Flowsheet of the process flow diagram in PRO/II Simulation
102
2.8 Comparison of Manual and Simulation Calculation
𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 − 𝑀𝑎𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙
𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛(%) = | | × 100%
𝑆𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
This section will elaborate on the comparison of the manual mass balance
calculation with the simulation performed using the PRO/II software. The results for
all the mass flow rates in kg/hr of all the streams involved in the manual computation
and PRO/II, as well as the percentage deviation, are listed in the table below.
Table 2.37 Comparison of the manual mass balance calculation with the
simulation
MANUAL
SIMULATION
STREAM CALCULATION DEVIATION (%)
(kg/hr)
(kg/hr)
S1 6000.0000 6000.0000 0
S2 6000.0000 6000.0000 0
S3 6000.0000 6000.0000 0
S4 14000.0000 14000.0000 0
103
S5 14000.0000 14000.0000 0
S6 14000.0000 14000.0000 0
S7 20000.00 20000.00 0
S8 20000.00 20000.00 0
104
2.8.2 Energy Balance Comparison
The comparison of the manual energy balance calculation with the simulation
made using the PRO/II software will be discussed in this section. The percentage
variation and results for all the enthalpy flow rates in J/hr of all the streams involved
in the manual calculation and PRO/II are listed in the table below.
Pump (P-101) 0 0 0
Pump (P-102) 0 0 0
Fluidized Bed
13072153.82 9210402.868 41.9281
Reactor (R-101)
Distillation
-10436718.738 -34193452.24 69.4774
Column (C-101)
Absorption
-4723468.22620 -4722124.048 0.0285
Column (C-102)
105
For the energy balance comparison, we calculated the ∆H value for each unit
operation and then the value is compared to the value of the unit operation duty that
were obtained from the simulation. According to the Table 2.38, we can observe that
most of the unit operation shows high value of the deviation. First, the fluidized bed
reactor display that the deviation value is 41.9%. This error might happen due to the
calculation for the heat capacity data from the manual calculation. The equation used
from the simulation might be different from the equation used for manual calculation.
Since coefficient value is differs from the simulation, this may lead to the higher
deviation obtained.
For the cooler E-103, E-104 and E-105 the deviation value for the energy
balance comparison is 202.6%, 188.7% and 183.7% respectively. This inaccuracy
happened because of the calculation value of the enthalpy for the inlet and outlet
stream for the manual calculation is different from the calculated enthalpy from
simulation. All the enthalpy value for the manual calculation for both inlet and outlet
stream show higher value compared to the enthalpy obtained from the simulation. The
∆H value calculated from the manual is relatively high from the simulation value.
Therefore, this condition will be affecting the deviation value for the cooler.
Lastly, the calculated deviation for flash column F-102 values is 355.8%. The
flash column F-102 shows the highest deviation because of the molar flow rate
obtained from the manual calculation for the top outlet (S18) is 0.303 kmol/hr while
the value obtained from the simulation is 60.46 kmol/hr. In addition, the molar flow
rate of the outlet value of bottom stream for that unit operation from manual calculation
is 214.01 kmol/hr and value obtained from simulation is 150.03 kmol/hr. Due to the
difference on the molar flow rate, the value for energy calculation will also be affected
because to calculate the enthalpy, we need the molar flow rate value. Thus, this will
increase the deviation value for the flash column since the difference of the enthalpy
from simulation and manual calculation is high
106
CHAPTER 3
WASTE MANAGEMENT
3.1 Introduction
Industrial was is the waste that can come in form of gas, liquid, and solid.
Different form of waste will require different way of disposal or treatment. This
industrial waste can be categorized into two types, hazardous and non- hazardous
waste. Non-hazardous waste is any waste that is not harmful to people and the
environment and can be disposed of easily. However, for hazardous waste, it can give
impact to the human especially in term of health risk. Plus, it is also can affect the
ecosystem of the environment in a dangerous way. Therefore, it is important to treat
the waste in a proper way according to the regulations. This is important to reduce the
risk of pollution to the environment and threaten the human health. This chapter will
discuss regarding the effluent and waste that been produced from production of
Acrylonitrile from Ammonia. The waste and by-product that formed from the reaction
will be categorised into their phase which is solid, liquid and gas, in order to
considering and finalizing the method of disposal or treatment.
107
to rank the waste management options according to the most proper way for the
environment. The first priority of the hierarchy goes to preventing waste at the first
place. The ranks then followed by re-use, recycling, recovery and disposal. The
diagram of the waste management can be referred as Figure 3.1.
After that, the rank will descend to the recycle stage. The recycling
process is an action of turning the waste into a new item or product. It is known as the
most environmentally friendly solution. As the manufacturer, recycling the waste or
the material will provide side profit to the company aside from reducing the waste that
been produce. Recovery is the fourth stage of the hierarchy of waste management. For
this stage, it is defined in term of recovering the waste into energy form. It is the
108
process of incinerating the waste that cannot be recycled to produce energy that can
generate electricity. By applying energy recovery stage, it will reduce our dependency
on the fossil fuels and reduce the rate of carbon that released to the environment. As
the manufacturer, energy recovery can contribute to the reduction of utilities cost and
lessen the waste production at the same time. When all the stage in the waste hierarchy
cannot be conduct, then the last option can be applied which is waste disposal.
However, this method only can be applied followed by the strict regulations to avoid
environment from possible pollution.
The Environmental Quality Act 1974 is a legislative act that governs the
prevention, reduction, and control of pollution and the enhancement of the
environment. An Act deals with the prevention, removal, and management of
corruption, the improvement of the environment, and related purposes. This rule
establishes a Director-General for Environmental Quality responsible for coordinating
all actions involving waste discharge into the environment, pollution control, and the
enhancement of environmental quality. To address environmental issues, the
Malaysian government has enacted several significant environmental laws and
policies, including the Environment Quality Act 1974 and its Regulations 1989, and
implemented some international ecological obligations to achieve a sustainable
environment and development in the country.
109
growth, environmental preservation, and social well-being. There are 17 Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs) introduced which targets to achieve by year 2030 for
peace, prosperity, dignity for the planet and humankind. Figure 3.2 below shows the
17 sustainable goals that are focusing on three aspects, social, economic and
environmental sustainability. From the SDGs shows below, there are some of
sustainable goals that can be aided by our production plants.
From the SDGs, Goal 3 focuses on the good health and well-being for all ages.
It’s quite related with our production plant by ensuring to manage the waste either it’s
chemical, biological or physical waste from the production plant properly. It is because
disposing the waste especially the chemical waste in improper way can lead to
environmental and health problems. Chemical waste itself is quite hazardous which
may cause fire explosion, adverse health effects, and damage to the environment.
Hence, the most important purpose for good waste management is to safeguard the
environment as well as the public's health and safety to achieve the goal 3 of the SDGs.
Next, more than 40% of individuals in the world are affected by water scarcity
although water demand has increased at more than double the rate of population
110
growth over the previous century. So, this problem is one of the main reasons why
SDGs of Goal 6 should be achieved. It’s to ensure every people can access clean
drinking water. So, in our production plant, if the wastewater is treated properly which
means all of the contaminant, nutrients, heavy metals, micro-pollutants and others is
removed completely, this goal of SDGs may achieve successfully. The technology to
treat the wastewater also should be improved to reuse the used water and prevent from
consuming a lot of water.
Other goals that are can be implemented in our production plant is Goal 12
which is responsible consumption and production. In order to achieve this goal, the
way of harmful waste and contaminants being disposed from plant should be efficient
and manage well. According to United Nations, by encouraging the industries,
businesses and consumers to reduce and recycle their waste which will reduce the
ecological footprint at the same time. It is very important to develop a more sustainable
consumption by year 2030.
Lastly, our production plant also contributed in aided to achieve goal 13,
climate action. As we all already know, extreme weather events such as heat waves,
droughts, and floods are becoming more common and intense as a result of climate
change. There’s a lot of causes that lead to climate change due to human activities.
The greenhouse effect is the primary cause of climate change. The greenhouse gaseous
can result in global warming due to some gases that trapped the sun’s heat and prevent
it from escaping to the space. Various strategic initiatives have been taken by industries
to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous
oxide to the environment. In response to the impacts of climate change, industries are
encouraged to establish resilience and adaptive capability for the industry and its
supply chain.
111
3.1.4 Standards and Regulations for Wastewater Management in Malaysia
The Environmental Quality Act 1974 regulates the standards and restrictions
for industrial effluent discharge into common water bodies in Malaysia. The
Environmental Quality Act (EQA) 1974 is a body of legislation in Malaysia that relates
to the prevention, reduction, and control of pollution and the improvement of the
environment. The effluent standards govern effluent discharge from a wastewater
treatment facility to any receiving body of water. The Department of the Environment
(DOE) established these discharge guidelines to assist in the protection of receiving
waters and aquatic ecosystems and safeguard human health from the harmful effects
of untreated wastewater. There are environmental quality regulations 1974 that must
be followed by any establishment that discharges sewage into or into any soil, inland
water, or Malaysian water, save for any housing or commercial development with a
population equivalent of fewer than 150 people. Environmental Quality Act (EQA)
1974 stipulates two kinds of effluent discharge: Standard A for releases upstream of
any raw water intake and Standard B for releases downstream of any raw water intake
(Environmental Quality Act, 1974 – Policies – IEA, 2020).
There are three types of waste generated in acrylonitrile production plants that
use the ammoxidation method which consist of solid, liquid, and gas. Table 3.1 lists
the waste classifications generated by the production plant and their sources of
generation.
Table 3.1 The waste classifications generated by the production plant and their
sources of generation.
Source Of Waste
Type Of Waste Waste Generated
Generated
112
• Fluidized Bed
Solid • Titanium Dioxide
Reactor
• Wastewater
• Distillation
• Ethyl Acrylate
Column
Liquid • Ethanol
• Dimethyl
• Absorber
Sulfoxide
• Ammonia
Gas • Flash Drum
• Ethanol
Solid waste is the waste that produce during the production process in solid
form. Normally for the industrial was, the most common sources of solid waste are
from catalyst.
113
3.3.2 Management of Solid Waste
The solid waste needs to be treated properly to avoid from polluting the
environment and risking the human health when exposed to it. Several methods have
been proposed to manage the solid waste produced. The method includes scheduled
waste and catalyst regeneration.
A. Scheduled Waste
B. Catalyst Regeneration.
114
3.3.3 Comparison and Selected Solution
Based on the Table 3.2, after considering all the advantages and disadvantages
of the scheduled waste and catalyst regeneration, the scheduled waste will be choosing
as the method to treat the waste. This is because since the catalyst is one of hazardous
substances that can need proper handling, disposed the waste can be much safer route.
Furthermore, this process will avoid from using the spent catalyst that might affect the
efficiency of the reaction.
115
liquids are quite hazardous and sometimes harmful to human health and the
environment. There are regulations that apply to the storage, transportation, treatment,
and disposal of hazardous and liquid wastes.
Our company has proposed a few technologies that can be used to treat these
liquid wastes that will tabulated in Table 3.3 below.
• Membrane bio-reactor
Ethanol
• Reverse Osmosis
S15 • Ultraviolet Irradiation
Dimethyl Sulfoxide
• Biological treatment
116
3.4.2.1 Wastewater Treatment of Ethyl Acrylate and Water from S-13
Ethyl acrylate (EA) is a widely known and sustainable molecule that was used
to make polymers including resins, plastics, rubber, and denture material. It can be
made in a variety of industrial ways, such as by reacting acrylonitrile with ethanol
using sulfuric acid as a catalyst to make ethyl acrylate. Acetylene, carbon monoxide,
and ethanol can also be used to make it. Heat, light, and peroxides all speed up the
polymerization of ethyl acrylate when it is left to stand. However, because of its
flammability, toxicity, and strong reactivity, ethyl acrylate poses a safety risk (And,
2016). This chemical is the main raw material that has been used in our plant. This
unreacted reactant is produced from the distillation unit operation. The main effluent
produced through the distillation unit is water and EA with the composition of 78.61%
and 19.33% respectively. There are several technologies can be used to treat this
wastewater.
117
will be used to treat the chemical wastes. Disinfection, which eliminates or detoxifies
hazardous microorganisms such as viruses and bacteria, is the final stage for
wastewater that needs to be treated thoroughly before being reused. Chlorine is an
inexpensive disinfectant that has been widely used in disinfection. The wastewater
may go through intermediate phases, such as pH modifications to improve coagulation
or temperature adjustments to maximise chemical reactions, depending on the
contaminants. Thus, these treatment methods can be used to treat the wastewater.
B. Adsorption
118
3.4.2.2 Comparison and Selected Solution
Table 3.4 shows a comparison of the technologies offered for liquid waste
management in S13.
From the comparison of the technologies that have been proposed above, our
company decided to choose method B, which is to treat the wastewater using the
adsorption with activated carbon. As we can observed from the Table 3.4, the
adsorption with activated carbon is better than chemical wastewater treatment because
the adsorption process helps to produce a high-quality treated effluent and the
efficiency for the treatment is very high. Hence, adsorption with activated carbon
treatment technology is the best choice to treat the wastewater and it also produce clean
effluent before discharge to river or to be reused by the plant.
119
3.4.2.3 Waste Treatment of Ethanol and Dimethyl Sulfoxide from S15
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) has been used in the production plant as a solvent
to remove the excess of ethanol in absorption column. It is because DMSO has been
widely used as solvent due to its characteristics that is miscible with water. DMSO
also known as a nontoxic, aprotic and inert substances that quite stable at high
temperature. Although it is not too toxic, DMSO has caused very few harmful effects
in people. Nausea, skin rashes, headaches, and an odd garlic-onion-oyster odour in the
body and breath are the most prevalent symptoms when someone is over-exposed to
this chemical. Even if dimethyl sulfoxide has no significant environmental impact,
industrial wastewaters containing DMSO must be treated before being released into
the environment.
Ethanol is a side product that has been generated in the production plant. In
order to increase the purity of the product, ethanol must be removed. Hence, DMSO
has been used to absorb the ethanol from the mixture by using an absorption column.
Ethanol contains a substance that is toxic to aquatic organisms. The product contains
ethanol substances that are hazardous for the environment. So, the wastewater that
contains both DMSO and ethanol should be treated before being released to the nearby
water sources. Several technologies can be used to treat this kind of wastewater.
120
A. Advanced Oxidation Process
An advanced oxidation process (AOP) has been devised for the breakdown of
organic contaminants in wastewater. This treatment can be used to treat ethanol and
DMSO because they are organic compounds. AOP are a type of chemical treatment
that oxidises organic molecules in wastewater that are difficult to handle biologically
and converts them to simple final products. AOP can be used with ultraviolet (UV)
irradiation to provide a powerful wastewater treatment. UV irradiation is commonly
employed in AOPs because the exposure of UV light can enhance the formation of
free radicals from oxidising chemicals which is hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Ibrahim
et al., 2019). By directly photolysis of hydrogen peroxide, UV-based radical AOPs
generate potential oxidising species such as the hydroxyl radical. Hydrogen peroxide
will quickly degrade DMSO and ethanol when it is combined with the UV. There will
be no toxic compounds produced as a result of this interaction. It is also inexpensive
to treat.
Other than using AOP to treat the wastes, selling the DMSO as a by-product or
reusing it again in the production plant are also ways to prevent it from being released
121
to the environment or nearby water sources. Before selling it or recycling it, the DMSO
has to undergo a separation process like a distillation column to separate the DMSO
and ethanol, respectively. If the DMSO is not recycled back into the absorption
column, it can be sold as a cleaning agent to individuals, businesses, and institutions.
It can be used as an electronic component cleaner, chemical reactor cleaning agent,
plant cleaning agent, mould release solvent for motor parts moulding and so on. As
pure DMSO solvent is quite expensive, which is around RM 419.45 per pound, selling
DMSO as a by-product to the other company can save the money from buying pure
materials. Hence, the circular economy concept can be achieved as the by-product is
processed and sold again. The linear economy also can be eliminated instantly. The
same goes for ethanol. Since the mass flowrate is also quite high, instead of releasing
it to the nearby water sources, it can be sold to the painting industry as an effective
solvent to be used in paints, lacquers, and varnish, as well as personal care and
household cleaning products.
122
• Got issues of the
storage of the
substances
From the comparison of the technologies that have been proposed above, our
company decided to choose method B, which is to sell the DMSO and ethanol liquid
as a by-product after undergoing a separation process. We discovered that selling the
substances would provide us with more benefits than disposing of them in nearby
water sources after treatment. Other than giving benefit to us, it also saves the
environment and aquatic life as all of the chemical substances will be sold. Another
reason is that S15 has produced a lot of DMSO and ethanol, around 11538.61 kg/hr
and 1941.29 kg/hr, respectively. Treating the substances and releasing them to the
nearby water sources will cause losses to our company as a higher flowrate of
substances has been generated. Instead, selling it is more sustainable and appropriate
compared to waste treatment.
Gaseous waste is the waste released in the form of gas by factories, mobiles,
and biomass combustion. These gaseous wastes can have a harmful influence on the
environment if they are not adequately managed.
123
shows the respective flow rates of each gaseous component in each stream. Gaseous
waste was released from S9 which is the distillate of the flash column.
The technologies that can be used to treat this gaseous waste are as stated below
in Table 3.7.
S9 Ammonia
• Wet Scrubber
124
• Selling It Off as
Acrylonitrile
By-Product
Ethanol
A few alternative methods have been proposed for gaseous waste management
in this process.
A. Wet Scrubber
A wet scrubber removes particulate matter and gaseous pollutants from the air.
The tower is supplied with a polluted gas stream. Within the tower, a bed of specialized
packing material nozzles sprays cleaning solutions onto the packing material, which
then makes its way down the tower. As the gas flows through the packing material,
particle and gas molecules come into touch with the cleaning liquid coating on the
packing. The tainted fluid runs down through the packing material and out the bottom
of the tower. The gas stream exits the tower through the top of the packing material,
past the nozzles, and through a mist eliminator.
125
Figure 3.4 Wet Scrubber
Apart from wet scrubbing the gas waste, selling the ammonia as a by-product
or reusing it in the manufacturing facility are alternative options to avoid being
discharged into the environment or a nearby water source. Before it can be sold or
recycled, ammonia gas must be separated from other chemicals using a distillation
column. If ammonia is not recycled into the reactor, it may be utilised in industry for
various purposes, including petroleum refining, pharmaceutical manufacturing, water
disinfection, and as a refrigerant. Pure ammonia solvent is highly costly, ranging
between USD 664 and USD 789 per metric tonne (Ammonia Price, Prices, Pricing,
Market & Analysis | ChemAnalyst, 2021). The ammonia market is estimated to reach
USD73.15 billion in 2028, with a compound annual growth rate of 6.64 per cent over
the forecast period (Market Research Future, 2021). Selling ammonia to another firm
as a by-product may save money purchasing pure ingredients. As a result of the by-
product being processed and resold, the circular economy notion may be realised.
126
biomass, consumes less energy, and creates recyclable biogas ethanol as a by-product
(Poh & Chong, 2009).
Table 3.8 shows a comparison of the technologies offered for liquid waste
management in S9.
• Each composition of
Selling it Off • Got extra income
value may be
as By- • Environmental benefits
different from the
Product • Save aquatic life and
original product.
human health
127
• Got issues of the
storage of the
substances
After considering the pros of the various technologies, our company chose
approach B, which involves selling ammonia as a by-product after a separation
procedure. We determined that selling the compounds would generate more revenue
than disposing them in local water sources after treatment. Apart from benefiting us,
it also helps the environment and marine life since all chemical compounds will be
sold. Another explanation is that S9 generated significant ammonia, around 3719.60
kg/hr. Treating the consequences and releasing them into nearby water sources would
result in losses for our firm because of the increased flow rate of imports. Rather than
waste treatment, selling it is more sustainable and suitable.
128
Based on the Table 3.9, the composition in S18 stream was dominated by
ammonia gas. Ammonia gas can affect the environment if it is keep released without
proper treatment.
A. Wet Scrubber
As been mention from previous part, the wet scrubber is one of the alternatives
that been widely used in the industry to treat the gas waste. Since it is designed to able
to trapped most of the particulate and hazardous gaseous without the need to use
specific reagent for a certain chemical released, it is become one of the methods that
highly flexible in solving the problem. It is also efficient in reducing the amount of
hazardous gas released to the surrounding
B. Dry Scrubber
Dry scrubber has been used to remove the harmful particulate from the
industrial exhaust gaseous before it is released to the environment. The mechanism is
quite similar to the wet scrubber. To differentiate the dry scrubber from the wet
scrubber, dry scrubber uses the dry reagents as a medium that will be sprayed into the
exhaust stream instead of water (Afework et al., 2022). The reagents used are normally
dry hydrated lime instead of the lime slurry used in the semidry scrubber system. The
mechanism of dry scrubber can be referred as in Figure 3.5.
129
Figure 3.5 The mechanism of dry scrubber equipment.
In the process, the exhaust gas must be cooled first to ease the removal of the
pollutants. Then, it will undergo the injection process where the dry reagent injected
into the stream to react with the harmful gaseous to reduce the acidity of the gas. Then
it will be using the fabric filter to capture the scrubbed powder and the cleaner gas
released from the scrubbing chamber (Kiang, 2018).
Table 3.10 shows a comparison of the technologies offered for gas waste
management in S18.
• Need for
Wet Scrubber • Avoid from the various of
maintenance
pollutants from entering
frequently.
the surrounding air through
• Can lead to
the exhaust gas.
corrosion quite
130
• Can be used to remove a severely since it is
wide range of pollutants. operating with
• Can withstand wide range water.
of temperature which is
flexible for any operating
condition.
• Residual waste
Dry Scrubber • Produce little waste
powder that must
material.
be disposed of
• Able to dealt with the very
because it is a
acidic streams.
hazardous
• No associated cost with
material.
removing, transporting,
• Specific reagent
and storing waste water.
needed for a
• Smaller space requirement
certain gaseous.
• The process of
scrubbing is
expensive.
131
CHAPTER 4
ENERGY INTERGRATION
4.1 Introduction
Heat integration is a mechanism for integrating the mass and energy involved
in any production procedure. Integration of mass and energy in any process is crucial,
as these two factors significantly affect the total process performance, operating costs,
and capital expenditures. Heat is a type of energy that cannot be generated or destroyed
but can only be transported from one form to another. The design of a chemical
process's parameters will be prioritized and adjusted based on several measurements,
including those for economic, environmental, and sustainable factors, before the stiff
heat integration (Ryu & Maravelias, 2019). In general, heat integration projects began
with a well-designed process. Our finding has shown that integrating heat into plant
production is both feasible and effective.
132
streams must be heated. A lot of unnecessary external costs, such as those for heating
oil, steam, refrigerants, and cooling water, are incurred throughout the heating and
cooling process. Therefore, the integration of a heater and a cooler might lead to a high
saving cost.
Pinch analysis is a method for decreasing the overall amount of energy used in
a chemical reaction. It operates by determining the energy targets that are
thermodynamically feasible and achieving them through heat recovery systems,
process operating conditions, and energy supply optimization. The following stages
are necessary to finish the pinch analysis design:
1. Extracting data.
3. Construction of the grand composite, the composite curve, and the heat
cascade.
The pinch analysis approach has made the Heat Exchanger Network design
much more methodical and systematic. The combined hot and cold composite curves,
Tmin and the pinch point, and grand composite curve are some of the important
concepts that need to be emphasized on when performing a pinch analysis.
133
Figure 4.1 Pinch analysis diagram (Klemeš & Kravanja, 2013)
Table 4.1 Summary of the hot and cold stream available for heat integration
Stream Stream Stream Supply Target Heat Heat
No Name Type Temperature, Temperature, Load, Capacity,
TS (℃) TT (℃) ∆H (kW) CP (kW/℃)
134
4.3 Composition Curve
The temperature-enthalpy diagrams for the combined hot and cold streams are
essentially composite curves. It is a method for graphically identifying the heat
cascade. Following are the steps of drawing a composite curve:
6. The shifting rule states that the temperature of a cold stream must be added
∆Tmin,
with while the temperature of a hot stream must be subtracted with
2
∆Tmin,
.
2
The hot and cold composite data are shown in Table 4.2 and 4.3 respectively.
135
Table 4.2 Hot composite data
T (℃) ∆T (℃) Stream Temperature ∆CP Total CP Total Duty
(kW/℃) (kW)
310
70
25 H1 + H3 56.4899 1412.25
45
20 H2 + H3 42.4819 849.64
25
310
70
-40
The graph of hot composite curve, cold composite curve, hot and cold
composite curve and shifted composite curve for hot and cold are displayed in Figure
4.2, 4.3, 4.4 and 4.5 respectively.
136
Figure 4.2 Hot Composite Curve
137
Figure 4.4 Hot & Cold Composite Curve
As despite in Figure 4.5, the shifted composite curves for ∆Tmin = 10℃.
According to the graph, the pinch temperature is at 305℃ while the hot pinch
temperature and cold pinch temperate are at 310℃ and 305℃ respectively. The
minimum heating requirement is 168.32 kW whereas the minimum cooling
138
requirement is 3441.82 kW. Furthermore, the energy recovery is 4931.59 kW and the
target or possible energy saving of heating and cooling requirement throughout the
process integration are 96.70% and 58.90% respectively.
The composite curves that were previously discussed can be used to define
energy targets, but because they rely on graphical composition, they can be difficult.
The Problem Table Algorithm (PTA), an algebraic method for predicting energy goals,
was developed by Linnhoff and Flower. The specific number of cold and hot utilities
needed as well as the position of the pinch point are determined using the Problem
Table Algorithm (PTA). When compared to the composite curve, this method is more
accurate. Using the Problem Table Algorithm (PTA), it is possible to determine the
process's pinch temperature. The steps for the Problem Table Algorithm (PTA) are as
follows:
2. The actual stream temperature, Tact is converted into shifted temperature, Tshift
by subtracting half of the minimum temperature difference from the hot stream
temperature while adding half of the cold stream temperature.
a. For hot stream, Ts* (shifted) = Ts – ½ ∆Tmin and Tt* (shifted) = Tt – ½ ∆Tmin
3. As the temperature scale shifts from interval to interval, the balance of heat is
maintained. Then, select the largest negative heat flow as required by the
utilities. The temperature of the interval with zero heat flow is the pinch point
139
Table 4.4 Actual temperature and shifted temperature
Stream Stream Ts (℃) Tt (℃) CP Ts* (℃) Tt* (℃)
No. type (kW/℃)
H2 Hot 45 25 11.4567 40 20
H3 Hot 70 25 31.0252 65 20
140
Table 4.5 Problem Table algorithm
315 0 168.33
305 -168.33 0
75 1817.07 1985.39
65 1975.34 2143.67
40 3146.66 3314.98
20 3803.55 3971.87
141
Table 4.5 displays the problem Table algorithm resulting from the method. The
following is a list of the outcomes of the problem table algorithm approach;
The minimum heating requirement, QH, min of 168.33 kW indicated that the
process would need additional heating utilities to fulfil the heating loaf of cold streams
while the minimum cooling requirement, QC, min of 3441.82 kW indicates that the
process will need additional cooling utilities to fulfil the cooling load of the hot
streams.
4.5 Heat Exchanger Network (HEN) for Maximum Energy Recovery (MER)
142
analysis is a graphical depiction that allows designers to quickly interpret and
comprehend the complex chemical plant processes (Hafizan et al., 2019).
The design of HENs can be separated into two distinct categories: grassroots
and retrofit. Whereas retrofit refers to an improvement using a heat recovery system
for an existing plant, grassroots design refers to the designing of HEN for new plants.
As a result, the data needed for grassroot type are obtained directly from the mass and
energy balances by the simulations, whereas for retrofits it is possible to obtain both
the data from the simulation and data from the measurement at the current plant.
Additionally, the HEN's goal is to determine how many heat exchangers should be
included in the design and performance targets. The minimum heating (QH min) need,
and minimum cooling requirement (QC min) are part of the performance objective in
this context. The performance targets are denoted as maximum energy recovery
(MER), together with the quantity of heat exchangers (Gundersen, 2013).
HEN is frequently shown as grid diagrams that process streams and connect
heat exchangers between various streams. The hot and cold streams are represented by
horizontal lines with arrows, while the heat exchangers are represented by vertical
lines that are connected. The stream's arrows indicate the direction of heat flow.
Vertical illustrations show where the process gets constrained. By referring to the
pinch analysis from earlier, the pinch point is shown here. These were supported by
Yong et al. (2015), who noted that further calculations are necessary to show network
pinch (Yong et al., 2015).
The pinch design method (PDM) is a crucial HEN requirement. PDM refers to the
pinch decomposition principle used to separate the HEN, where the HEN is divided
into above and below pinch at the pinch temperature. These prevent any cross-pinch
143
heat transfer, which doubles the cost of heat transfer. The summary of the pinch design
method (PDM) is stated as follows (Gundersen, 2013):
2. The above pinch network and below pinch network of HEN are designed
separately.
3. The pinch exchanger is the first to be designed. The component directly above
and below the pinch is called a pinch exchanger.
5. CP rules:
6. When CP rules are violated, the stream splitting technique must be considered.
7. A heater cannot be assigned below the pinch point. The cooler is also not
permitted at the higher pinch.
The process-to-process units are assigned with using the remaining heat and
cooling in the hot and cold stream as they move away from the pinch in both directions
after the pinch exchanger. The following equation must be used to demonstrate the
temperature of the connected heat exchangers in the grid diagram in order to show the
input and output temperatures of each assigned heat exchanger.
144
𝑄 = ṁ𝐶𝑃 (∆𝑇)
𝑄 = ṁ𝐶𝑃 (𝑇𝑆 − 𝑇𝑇 )
Where;
145
Figure 4.6 Heat exchanger network (HEN) for below and above pinch for maximum energy recovery
146
4.7 Comparison between Utilities Consumption Before and After MER
This section will explain about the total utilities’ consumption before and after
heat integration.
S2 C1 3373.05
S6 C2 1726.86
S10 H1 6748.14
S12 H2 229.13
S16 H3 1396.13
147
Figure 4.7 Process flow diagram after heat integration
148
CHAPTER 5
PROCESS CONTROL
149
5.2 Control System
a) Pressure Control
Pressure control products are designed to control the amount of force produced
by a fluid system. The pressure controller functioning by sensing the downstream
pressure via a feedback loop that automatically adjusts to maintain setpoint ("Control
System", 2022). When the output of the regulator senses that the pressure has dropped
below a predetermined point, the regulator opens and allows more pressure though.
Once the pressure reaches the setpoint, the regulator closes and no longer allows flow.
b) Temperature Control
150
variable to change the quantity of heat being added or taken from the process. Some
of the materials that commonly manipulated in temperature-controlled process are
water, steam and gas.
c) Flow Control
d) Level Control
The process control system has been the vital aspect in the production plant.
Commonly, there are two types of control system that been applied in the process
control system which is feedback control and feedforward control. In a feedback
controller system or normally known as closed-loop system, the applied input or
controlling factor depends on the output of the system. In this system, the comparison
between input and achieved output is done to get the desired output signal("Control
151
System", 2022). Figure 5.1 shows the process diagram of the feedback controller
diagram.
152
Figure 5.3 Cascade controller diagram.
In a standard P&ID layout, it is necessary to have the symbols and legends that
being used to assist the people to figure out the production plant control system. It is
commonly related to flowrate, temperature, pressure and liquid level. Table 5.1 &
Table 5.2 shows the list of symbols and legends that been used in the P&ID layout.
153
LAL Level Alarm Low Sends the warning and
alarmed when the level
reaches the low setpoint.
154
Pressure Control Instrumentation
155
opening and closure of
valve.
156
Alarm Pressure Alarm High (PAH),
Pressure Alarm Low (PAL),
Level Alarm High (LAH),
Level Alarm Low (LAL),
Temperature Alarm High
(TAH), Temperature Alarm
Low (TAL). Flow Alarm
High (FAH), Flow Alarm
Low (FAL).
Pneumatic signal
Electric signal
157
Most of the equipment will be installed with an alarm controller to alerted the workers
regarding any issue or malfunction that occurred in the plant.
Controlling the reactors that exist in the plant is one of the most important
aspects of a chemical plant. This is because the reactor is at the center of all operations,
and several aspects must be considered to ensure that the operation runs smoothly
(Johnson, 2014). Flow rate, pressure, temperature, load capacity, efficiency, and cost
are all parameters that are used in this chemical plant to achieve maximum yield
efficiency and purity. To maintain a stable operation, an effective, well-designed
control system is required. This chemical facility has only one operational reactor in
the overall processing plant.
1. The inlet of the feed which are ammonia and ethyl acrylate is controlled by
manipulating the feed flow rate.
158
Table 5.3 Control system analysis of reactor (R-101)
Control Manipulated Disturbance Type of Set point
variable Variable controller
159
Figure 5.4 Control system design of reactor (R-101)
Several control criteria must be met while building the control system for the
flash column in order to preserve the purity of the final result. (Ellis, 2012) It is
necessary to create an effective control system using the four primary control variables
listed below.
• Level control
The level controller is fitted to prevent the liquid level in the column from
becoming too high or too low. This mechanism serves as the flash column's control
point and is located at the base of the column. Level transmitters are devices that
convey signals to level control systems (Tabereaux & Peterson, 2014).. Streams with
160
level controls will have their appropriate valves automatically open or close in
response to the feedback. If the liquid level exceeds or falls below 5% of the setpoint,
the control panel will display an alert.
• Pressure control
• Flow control
Flow is the pipe variable that is sensed and regulated by the valve positioned
after the pump. As the pressure drop increases, the control system would detect an
increase in fluid flow. In response, the control system would slightly open the valve
until the fluid flow reached the appropriate level. (Pazil .H, 2016)
161
valve prevent from
adjustment overflow
162
Table 5.5 Control system analysis of flash column (F-102)
Controlled Manipulated Disturbance Type of Set Point
Variable Variable Controller
163
Figure 5.6 Control system design of flash column (F-102)
Distillation control is typically the most complex control system design since
it incorporates several variables, non-linear, non-stationary behavior, and significant
control loop interaction. Inadequate control of distillation results in fluctuations and
instability. Consequently, product purity, column capacity, economic performance,
and plant operation will be compromised.
• Temperature control
164
The temperature of the column of distillation must be maintained at an optimal
level. As the distillation column will adhere to the boiling point concept, the
temperature is the most critical parameter that must be maintained and regulated at all
times. When the distillation column is overheated, more liquid will evaporate, leading
the undesirable component to rise to the top of the column, whereas when it is
underheated, the product purity will drop. Therefore, it is essential to maintain the
proper temperature, as both overheating and underheating will reduce the distillation
column's performance. By controlling the flowrate of cooling water or steam required
to feed the condenser and reboiler, temperature control is performed to reduce energy
usage.
• Level control
• Pressure control
Controlling the pressure is crucial for the majority of systems using vapor or
gas. The disturbance in pressure control may be caused by a malfunctioning pump or
compressor, as well as discrepancies in the flow rate of overhead (vapor). As a result,
the overhead vapor flow rate is chosen as the variable to be changed.
• Flow control
165
The flow control system will regulate the material balance on the feed streams.
Using a ratio, the flow control system will measure the critical feed flowrate or a
process mixture flow.
The control system for this distillation column is design to achieve the following
objectives:
2. To control the temperature at the top of the distillation column at the desired
temperature.
5. To control the liquid level in the reflux drum at the desired level.
7. To maintain the reflux ratio of the overhead product stream and the reflux
stream.
Pressure Inconsistent
Flowrate of
inside the feed pressure Feedback P = 2 bar, if
the overhead
distillation and feed controller pressure is ±10%
vapor stream
column. flowrate at the of the set point,
inlet of
166
distillation alarm will be
column activated
Temperature T = 123.96°C, if
Flowrate of
at the bottom Accumulation temperature is
the steam Feedback
of the of temperature ±10% of the set
entering controller
distillation from reboiler point, alarm will be
reboiler
column activated
The height is at
Inconsistent 50% of the
Liquid level
outlet flowrate distillation column
at the bottom Flowrate of
from reboiler Feedback to avoid flooding
of the the bottom
to the controller and the height at
distillation outlet stream
distillation least 5% of the
column
column distillation column
to avoid drying
167
The height is at
50% of the
Level of Inconsistent distillation column
Flowrate of
condensate in flowrate of the Feedback to avoid flooding
the overhead
the reflux overhead controller and the height at
vapor stream
drum vapor stream least 5% of the
distillation column
to avoid drying
Flowrate of
the reflux
Inconsistent
Reflux ratio stream
flowrate of the Reflux ratio =
of the recycled into Ratio
overhead 0.945
condensate the
stream
distillation
column
168
Figure 5.7 Control system design for distillation column 1 (C-101)
169
1. To keep the liquid level in the column from becoming too high or too
low.
3. To control the flow rate of the top and bottom feed at a desired number
before entering the column.
170
or low alarm
will be
triggered.
171
5.4.5 Heat Exchanger
Heat exchanger are one of the auxiliary devices that is use to transfer the heat
from one medium to another medium. In this production plant, after considering the
Heat Exchanger Network (HEN), there are three heat exchanger that been installed in
the production line that labelled as E-101, E-102 and E-105. Heat exchanger E-105,
that is used to cool down the fluid from reactor product will transfer the heat to both
E-102 and E-101. E-102 and E-101 are used to heat up the ethyl acrylate feed stream
and ammonia feed stream respectively.
172
Figure 5.9 Control System of Heat Exchanger E-101.
173
Figure 5.10 Control System of Heat Exchanger E-102
174
Figure 5.11 Control System of Heat Exchanger E-105.
5.4.6 Heater
175
Table 5.11 Process control analysis of heater (E-103)
Controlled Manipulated Type of
Disturbance Set Point
Variable Variable Controller
176
Figure 5.13 Process control design of heater (E-104)
5.4.7 Cooler
Cooler is one of the auxiliary devices that is used to reduce the temperature of
the fluid in stream. In this production plant, it consists of three cooler that been
installed in the plant production line which is E-106, E-107 and E-108. E-106 is used
to cool down the product stream temperature before undergoing the separation process
via flash separator, F-101. E-107 is used to reduce the temperature from the flash
separator bottom product before entering the distillation column, C-101. Then, E-108
is used to reduce the temperature of the top product of absorption column before
entering the second flash separator, F-102.
177
Table 5.13 Control system analysis of cooler (E-106)
Controlled Manipulated Type of
Disturbance Set Point
Variable Variable Controller
178
Temperature at Inlet flowrate Temperature Feedback T=25℃
stream 14. of the cooling from stream Controller
water pipeline. 12.
179
Temperature at Inlet flowrate Temperature Feedback T=25℃
stream 20. of the cooling from stream Controller
water pipeline. 18.
5.4.8 Pump
Pump is one of the devices that is functioning as the pressure riser of the liquid
that flow in a stream. For this production plant, there are two pump that is been
installed in the plant which is P-101 and P-102 that is will be used to transport the
ammonia and ethyl acrylate from the feed to the reactor. P-101 is used to increase the
180
pressure of ammonia feed stream from 1 bar to 4 bar while P-102 is used to increase
the pressure of the ethyl acrylate stream from 1 bar to 4 bar .
181
Table 5.17 Process control analysis of pump (P-102)
Controlled Manipulated Type of
Disturbance Set Point
Variable Variable Controller
182
5.5 Overall P&ID Control System
EQUIPMENT TAG
P-101 P-102 E-101 E-102 E-103 E-104 E-105 E-106 E-107 E-108 R-101 F-101 F-102 C-101 C-102
PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION
Fluidized
Heat Heat Heat Flash Flash Distillation Absorption DIAGRAM OF ACRYLONITRILE
Pump Pump Heater Heater Cooler Cooler Cooler Bed
Exchanger Exchanger Exchanger Separator Separator Column Column PRODUCTION
Reactor
LIC LEVEL INDICATOR CONTROLLER LT LEVEL TRANSMITTER XAL ALARM LOW DRAWING NO.
183
EQUIPMENT TAG
P-101 P-102 E-101 E-102 E-103 E-104 E-105 E-106 E-107 E-108 R-101 F-101 F-102 C-101 C-102
PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION
Fluidized
Heat Heat Heat Flash Flash Distillation Absorption DIAGRAM OF ACRYLONITRILE
Pump Pump Heater Heater Cooler Cooler Cooler Bed
Exchanger Exchanger Exchanger Separator Separator Column Column PRODUCTION
Reactor
LIC LEVEL INDICATOR CONTROLLER LT LEVEL TRANSMITTER XAL ALARM LOW DRAWING NO.
184
EQUIPMENT TAG
P-101 P-102 E-101 E-102 E-103 E-104 E-105 E-106 E-107 E-108 R-101 F-101 F-102 C-101 C-102
PIPING AND INSTRUMENTATION
Fluidized
Heat Heat Heat Flash Flash Distillation Absorption DIAGRAM OF ACRYLONITRILE
Pump Pump Heater Heater Cooler Cooler Cooler Bed
Exchanger Exchanger Exchanger Separator Separator Column Column PRODUCTION
Reactor
LIC LEVEL INDICATOR CONTROLLER LT LEVEL TRANSMITTER XAL ALARM LOW DRAWING NO.
185
CHAPTER 6
PROCESS SAFETY
6.1 Introduction
Global process operators prioritise safety to comply with local and international
requirements and effectively prevent production risks. However, differing persons'
understanding of safety concepts influences the measures performed to reduce risk and the
performance metrics employed. Specific locations emphasise occupational safety
enhancements, such as preventing falls and slips. Other plants, meanwhile, face more
significant safety concerns, such as explosions and fires in production zones (Kim, Kim, Lee,
Lim, & Moon, 2009). Both dimensions of safety require adequate consideration and the
adoption of suitable risk reduction strategies.
Safety is the condition of being protected against harm or other unfavourable effects.
Safety is frequently defined as managing known dangers to maintain an acceptable level of
risk. This is essential in a chemical processing facility, a hazardous industry where an accident
might have catastrophic results. The primary emphasis was on worker safety. In recent years,
loss prevention has virtually superseded protection. This definition includes danger detection,
186
technology evaluation, and the design of new engineering elements to prevent loss. In the past,
process accidents at industrial sites involving toxic, reactive, flammable, or explosive dangers
frequently resulted in fatalities and significant property damage, costing hundreds of millions
or billions of dollars (Chen, Pittman et al., 2015). Numerous elements may contribute to the
occurrence of an event, some of which may be associated with the incident's onset and others
with its escalation. A recent analysis identified safety culture, emergency preparation, and
mechanical integrity as the most prevalent causes of process safety mishaps across 14
industries, including mining, chemicals, agriculture, and pharmaceutical manufacturing
(Bhusari, Goh et al., 2021).
The process safety structure of an acrylonitrile production facility is based on the hazard
identification and technical evaluation criteria, considering all the chemical components
involved, such as ammonia and ethyl acrylate. In addition to temperature, the equipment's
pressure ranges and process conditions are considered. With the guidelines and regulations
established by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration in Malaysia, safety
management is formulated with this concern in mind. This chapter discusses safety measures
such as hazard and operability study (HAZOP). HAZOP is a formal and systematic
examination of a complex planned or current process or activity that identifies and evaluates
concerns that may constitute a threat to people or equipment. In addition, a chemical health
risk assessment (CHRA) is built to investigate the management of hazardous substances.
187
6.2.1 Plant Location
When selecting a location for a plant, a lot of things must be considered. Earlier theories
of industrial position utilised a simple framework to examine data, with locational and
exceptional diversification estimated by merely modifying the location and weight distance
features of inputs and outputs. Among the factors that influence the location of a plant are the
availability of raw materials, infrastructure facilities, workforce, government policy, market
proximity, regulation and taxation, local laws, ecological and environmental factors, land costs,
subsidies for backward areas, incentives, political climate, and climatic climate. First and
foremost, when addressing the plant site for all chemical plants, the plant should be positioned
far from any residential areas to avoid injuring surrounding residents.
Every chemical plant utilises chemicals for production. However, the exact number
varies. Improper storage of chemicals will result in chemical accidents (Simmons et al., 2008).
Implementing precautions while working with hazardous materials is very important to prevent
incidents involving the use of chemicals. They must be handled and stored correctly.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has specific standards for the
location and construction of rooms or buildings that house these compounds, including
descriptions of what should not store with particular categories of hazardous substances. Every
part of the design of a storage room has a rationale and a function, which prevents accidents
and tragedies involving the stored items and those around.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has specific standards for the
location and construction of rooms or buildings that house these compounds, including
descriptions of what should not store with particular categories of hazardous substances. Every
part of the design of a storage room has a rationale and a function, which prevents accidents
and tragedies involving the stored items and those around.
188
Multiple OSHA regulations involve storage restrictions for hazardous materials. Most
of these restrictions are to single substances, such as liquefied hydrogen, or groupings of
substances, including flammable and combustible liquids. Consequently, defining the qualities
of the dangers by labelling every chemical is crucial. The user can then adhere to the
precautions listed on the label, such as donning protective clothing and equipment. The
following parts should constantly review before entering a hazardous material storage area:
Physical and chemical properties Data on fire and explosion danger Reactivity Data on health
hazard Protection from hazards
6.2.3 Transportation
189
their employees' safety, health, and welfare. These rules acknowledge that identifying and
addressing potential dangers before an accident happens is a far more effective means of
preventing a negative consequence. Workers, equipment, and the surroundings of the
production plant are all protected by safety regulations. Every company should be responsible
for providing employees with the required safety and health information, training, and
supervision. In addition to adhering to OSHA's principles and regulations when performing
work duties, employees must also comply with them.
190
Goggle • Provide eyes area from dust, splashes and
impact
The greatest threat to a chemical industry is fire, which can cause explosions due to
gases, vapours, mists, and dust that escape during the production, processing, transportation,
and storage of combustible substances. This will result in fatalities and property destruction.
Fire risk management becomes crucial and essential to avoid such a catastrophic event. The
most important parts of risk management are ensuring employee safety, preventing fires, and
responding appropriately in the case of a fire. Some procedures can be taken in order to avoid
a fire from bursting and causing no deaths, collateral damage, or equipment failure.
191
6.4.1 Fire Detection and Alarm System
A fire and smoke detection device is a tool for identifying the earliest stages of fire by
monitoring the passage of smoke through the air. As soon as smoke is detected, the alarm will
signal fire and inform the building's residents. This early warning aids the personnel in
evacuating the building immediately when the alarm sounds. In addition, a fire detection
system can detect heat, gas, and light radiation emitted by a fire. Automatic detectors offer a
precise and rapid indication of the origin of a fire, and the presence of many sensors in the
facility helps mitigate severe damage. Modern smoke detectors are typically powered by
batteries, although the most common type is wired directly to the building's electrical system.
The direct wiring detector generally is equipped with a battery that serves as a backup power
source if the building's wiring system fails. In addition to frequent sensor inspections, it is
necessary to periodically replace the batteries to ensure adequate protection (Kubba, 2016)
A fire alarm system gives visible and audible warnings in the event of smoke and carbon
dioxide during a fire. This device functions alongside smoke and alarm detectors. The alarm is
promptly activated by using automation and the appropriate sensors. They are also manually
operable via call points or pull stations (Wong, 2004). Installing a smoke detector and alarm
system near potentially dangerous areas such as laboratories and chemical storage rooms is
essential. As soon as a minor fire flares, the alarm and sensors are activated, alerting others to
escape the premises immediately.
In the event of a fire, fire detectors and alarm systems are two essential tools that can
ensure the safety of employees. The alert will notify staff of the fire and expedite their response.
Notably, many innocent lives can be saved, and material damage can be diminished. The alarm
also notifies the closest fire station of the incident, allowing them to arrive swiftly.
192
6.5 Plant Emergency Response
According to the World Health Organization (2002), emergency response is the phase
of the disaster-management cycle that gets most of the attention. Floods, hurricanes, fires, and
explosions are emergencies that may affect operations. Environmental health services are the
most needed when this occurs. A risk assessment should be undertaken to identify the potential
emergency issues for designing an emergency response plan, an emergency response plan
(ERP) should be reviewed often as it gives techniques to evaluate the plan's efficacy in
responding to accidents Below are the contingency of an emergency action plan lies under
procedural, program and equipment requirements provided by OSHA (2004),
1. Identify potential emergency based on the design and environment of the workplace.
3. Evacuation procedures, including method of evacuation and escape routes in the event
of an emergency.
4. Procedures for those who would stay behind to run vital operations before being
evacuated.
5. Procedures for locating and accounting for staff that have been evacuated.
7. Contact information for those who need more information or clarification on the
programme
193
6.6 Hazard and Operability Studies (HAZOP)
6.6.1 Introduction
The HAZOP technique is divided into four stages which are definition, preparation,
examination, and reporting and follow-up. In the same way as HAZOP approaches can be
applied to processes, they can also be applied to machines and automated factories. The actions
or operations of the machine must first be divided into subsystems or tasks. The operation's
activities must then be defined, and each activity can then be evaluated for deviation using the
standard guide words.
194
5. To cut maintenance costs caused by operational issues.
1. Create a comprehensive flow chart. Divide the flow chart into several process units
(e.g., reactor or storage tank). Choose a unit to study.
3. Describe the study node's design purpose. (For example, Vessel V-1 is designed to store
benzene feedstock and provide it to the reactor on demand.)
5. Use a guiding word (next page) to suggest possible deviations for the process parameter.
6. Determine possible causes and any protective systems if the deviation is applicable.
10. Repeat steps 5 through 9 until the selected process parameter has obtained all
appropriate guiding words.
195
11. Repeat steps 4 through 10 until all applicable process parameters for the given study
node have been considered.
12. Repeat steps 2–11 until all study nodes for the given section have been considered, then
move on to the next part on the flow sheet.
196
LATER THAN Too late or in the Applies to process steps or actions
wrong order
WHERE ELSE In additional Applies to process locations, or locations in
locations operating procedures.
Almost all of the major equipment in plant has encountered a HAZOP analysis. A table
is used to describe the detailed HAZOP for each selected unit operation. There are seven main
equipment have been selected to analyze their HAZOP which are;
• Reactor
197
• Flash column
• Distillation column
• Absorption column
• Heat Exchanger
• Pump
198
Figure 6.1 Figure 1 P&ID part 1 of 3
199
Figure 6.2 P&ID part 2 of 3
200
Figure 6.3 P&ID part 3 of 3
201
6.6.5 HAZOP Study on Heat Exchangers, Heaters and Coolers
For heat exchangers, heaters, and coolers, the following goal is suggested:
• To ensure that the heat transfer process occurs by maintaining the heat transfer
at a defined value.
2. Operational limitations
2. Operational limitations
• Ensure that the process and equipment employed are in good working order •
Maintain the desired pressure.
202
Table 6.4 HAZOP on Heat Exchanger and Pump
HAZOP WORKSHEET
Project: Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia Date: 15 May 2022
Node: Node 1- Heat Exchanger, Heater, Cooler and Pump Page:
HAZOP Team Member:
1. Anis Khadijah Binti Md Ariffin
2. Nazira Syahira Binti Zulkifli
3. Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros Madi
4. Siti Aisyah Binti Mohd Shukri
5. Ummi Syifaa’ Binti Mohamad Rodzi
Node Description:
Include the heat exchanger E-101 and E-102, heater E-104, pumps P-101 and P-102, and stream 1,2,3,5,6 and 7 that responsible to phase
change of the inlet of raw material.
Parameter Guide Cause Consequences Safeguards Recommendation
Word
Pump P-101 or P- Possibility of the Regular inspection and
102 malfunction equipment to crack monitoring at the equipment.
High
or increment on Installed with the Pressure
Pressure the temperature. Indicator Controller (PIC 001 and
Pipeline leakage The flowrate of the PIC 002) Regular inspection and
Low at stream 1,2,3,5,6 feed decrease. monitoring at the pipeline.
or 7
Heat exchanger Excessive temperature Temperature Indicator controller
Assigned an operator to
Temperature High E-101 or E-102 may result to melting (TIC 001 and TIC 002) was
inspect the temperature
malfunction. of the material. installed.
203
Heat exchanger The desired regularly and to notify any
E-101 or E-102 temperature of the temperature fluctuation.
Low malfunction. feed is not achieved.
Inadequate heat
transfer.
204
6.6.7 HAZOP Study on Reactor
• To ensure that the process is under control in order to manufacture items that
meet specifications.
• Guarantee that the pressure, flow and temperature of the reactor are constantly
within the specified range to ensure stable operation.
205
Table 6.5 HAZOP on Fluidized Bed Reactor (R-101)
HAZOP WORKSHEET
Project: Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia Date: 15 May 2022
Node: Node 2- Fluidized Bed Reactor Page: 2
HAZOP Team Member:
1. Anis Khadijah Binti Md Ariffin
2. Nazira Syahira Binti Zulkifli
3. Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros Madi
4. Siti Aisyah Binti Mohd Shukri
5. Ummi Syifaa’ Binti Mohamad Rodzi
Node Description:
Include the fluidized bed reactor, R-101 and stream 4,8,9 and 10 that responsible to do reaction of ammonia and ethyl acrylate.
206
Feed temperature Overheating of the
High at stream 4 and 8 reactor that may lead Assigned an operator to
high to melt down. Temperature Indicator controller inspect the temperature of
Temperature
Cooling medium Lower purity of (TIC 005) was installed. reactor regularly and to notify
Low leak into the desired product. any temperature fluctuation.
reactor
Pipeline at stream Overpressure in the Installed Pressure Indicator Regular monitoring at the
Pressure High 9 blocked reactor that may lead Controller (PIC 003) and safety pipeline.
to crack of the reactor relief valve.
207
6.6.8 HAZOP Study on Flash Column
• To guarantee that the components in the column are separated before proceeding
with the process.
2. Constraints in Operations:
• Maintain the column's pressure and level within the appropriate range to ensure
that the components are separated efficiently.
• To guarantee that the overall process complies with all safety regulations
208
Table 6.6 HAZOP on Flash Column (F-101)
HAZOP WORKSHEET
Project: Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia Date: 15 May 2022
Node: Node 3- Flash Column Page: 3
HAZOP Team Member:
1. Anis Khadijah Binti Md Ariffin
2. Nazira Syahira Binti Zulkifli
3. Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros Madi
4. Siti Aisyah Binti Mohd Shukri
5. Ummi Syifaa’ Binti Mohamad Rodzi
Node Description:
Include the flash column, F-101 and stream 11,12, and 13 that responsible to separate ammonia from product.
209
Failure of safety Rupture of the column Installed Pressure Indicator Regular monitoring at the
High
relief valve Controller (PIC 004) pipeline and valve.
Pressure
Pipeline leakage at Low efficiency of the
Low
stream 13. separation
210
6.6.9 HAZOP Study on Distillation Column
• To guarantee that the components in the column are separated before proceeding
with the process.
2. Constraints in Operations:
• Maintain the column's pressure, level, temperature and flow within the
appropriate range to ensure that the components are separated efficiently.
• To guarantee that the overall process complies with all safety regulations
211
Table 6.7 HAZOP on Distillation Column (C-101)
HAZOP WORKSHEET
Project: Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia Date: 15 May 2022
Node: Node 4- Distillation Column Page: 4
HAZOP Team Member:
1. Anis Khadijah Binti Md Ariffin
2. Nazira Syahira Binti Zulkifli
3. Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros Madi
4. Siti Aisyah Binti Mohd Shukri
5. Ummi Syifaa’ Binti Mohamad Rodzi
Node Description:
Include the distillation column, C-101 and stream 14,15, and 16 that responsible to separate acrylonitrile from liquid mixture.
212
Pipe partial Separation process is
clogged at the not effective
Low
bottom outlet of
the reboiler
Flow control Rupture of the column
High valves, V-131
failure Installed Pressure Indicator Regular monitoring at the
Pressure
Vapor line Low efficiency of the Controller (PIC 004) pipeline and valve.
Low leakage at stream separation
16
Reboiler control Distillation column
High
failed will dry up
Loss of heating Low condensate Installed Temperature Indicator Regular inspection at the
Temperature
due to steam production rate Controller (TIC 009) reboiler and valve.
Low
leakage at the
reboiler
213
6.6.10 HAZOP Study on Absorption Column
• To guarantee that the components in the column are separated before proceeding
with the process.
2. Constraints in Operations:
• Maintain the column's pressure, flow and level within the appropriate range to
ensure that the components are separated efficiently.
• To guarantee that the overall process complies with all safety regulations.
214
Table 6.8 HAZOP on Absorption Column (C-102)
HAZOP WORKSHEET
Project: Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia Date: 15 May 2022
Node: Node 5- Absorption Column Page: 5
HAZOP Team Member:
1. Anis Khadijah Binti Md Ariffin
2. Nazira Syahira Binti Zulkifli
3. Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros Madi
4. Siti Aisyah Binti Mohd Shukri
5. Ummi Syifaa’ Binti Mohamad Rodzi
Node Description:
Include the absorption column, C-102 and stream 16,17,18 and 19 that responsible to absorb ethanol from liquid mixture.
215
Leakage of the Low desired product
Low pipeline at stream produce at outlet
18 stream
Flow valve, V- The ethanol will not
144 malfunction be separated
No
Installed Flow Fraction Regular inspection at the
Flow
Controller (FFC 003) valves.
Flow valve, V- Column dry up
Reverse
144 malfunction
216
6.6.11 HAZOP Study on Flash Column
• To guarantee that the components in the column are separated before proceeding
with the process.
2. Constraints in Operations:
• Maintain the column's pressure and level within the appropriate range to ensure
that the components are separated efficiently.
• To guarantee that the overall process complies with all safety regulations.
217
Table 6.9 HAZOP on Flash Column (F-102)
HAZOP WORKSHEET
Project: Production of Acrylonitrile from Ammonia Date: 15 May 2022
Node: Node 6- Flash Column (V-102) Page: 6
HAZOP Team Member:
1. Anis Khadijah Binti Md Ariffin
2. Nazira Syahira Binti Zulkifli
3. Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros Madi
4. Siti Aisyah Binti Mohd Shukri
5. Ummi Syifaa’ Binti Mohamad Rodzi
Node Description:
Include the flash column V-102, cooler E-108, stream 20, 21 and 22, and that used to separate the gas phase, mainly on Ammonia gas from the
liquid mixture of the main product stream, Acrylonitrile.
Parameter Guide Cause Consequences Safeguards Recommendation
Word
Pipeline Separation cannot
High blockage at occur Installed the Pressure
Regular inspection and monitoring at
Pressure stream 21 Indicator Controller (PIC
the pipeline.
Pipeline leakage The purity of the main 007)
Low
at stream 20 product decrease
Valve V-154 Flooding in the column Assign an operator to regularly
High Level Indicator Controller
malfunction. V-102. checking on the condition of the
Level (LIC 005) was equipped and
Valve V-154 Low the efficiency of valves.
Low alarm system was provided.
malfunction. separation process.
Cooler E-108 High vapour product Temperature Indicator
Temperature High malfunction and low desired controller (TIC 010) was
product obtained. installed.
218
Cooler E-108 Low efficiency of Assign an operator to inspect the
Low malfunction separation process. temperature regularly and to notify
any temperature fluctuation at cooler.
Valve V-151 No separation process
No
malfunction. occurs Flow Indicator Controller Regular maintenance on the valves
Flow
Low feed No separation process (FIC 003) was installed. condition.
Reverse
flowrate. occurs
219
6.7 Chemical Health Risk Assessment (CHRA)
• To identify the hazards posed by each chemical substance used, stored, handled or
transported within the place of work.
• To conclude the significance of the health risk posed by the hazardous chemicals.
220
ASSESMENT FINDINGS
LIST OF CHEMICALS HAZARDOUS TO HEALTH ASSESSED
221
Skin corrosion/ eye H315
irritation- Category 2
Skin sensitization- H317
Category 1
Carcinogenicity- H351
Category 2
Specific target organ H335
toxicity (single
exposure)- Category 3
Flammable gasses- H221
2. Ammonia Ammonia Gas Category 2 Airgas 3 Y Y
(CAS-No): Acute inhalation H332 SDS
7664-41-7 toxicity- Category 4 (1/10/2019)
Skin corrosion- H314
Category 1
Serious eye damage- H318
Category 1
Acute aquatic hazard- H400
Category 1
222
3. Dimethyl Dimethyl Liquid Flammable liquids- H227 ThermoFisher 2 N Y
sulfoxide sulfoxide Category 4 SDS
(CAS No): (24/12/2021)
67-68-5
223
Table 6.11 Chemicals released by the processes or work activities
224
Carcinogenicity- H351
Category 2
Specific target organ H335
toxicity (single
exposure)- Category 3
Flammable gasses- H221
2. Ammonia Ammonia Gas Category 2 Airgas 3 Y Y
(CAS-No): Acute inhalation H332 SDS
7664-41-7 toxicity- Category 4 (1/10/2019)
Skin corrosion- H314
Category 1
Serious eye damage- H318
Category 1
Acute aquatic hazard- H400
Category 1
Flammable liquids- H225 ThermoFisher
3. Acrylonitrile Acrylonitrile Colourless Category 2 Scientific 4 Y Y
(CAS-No): liquid Acute oral toxicity- H301 SDS
107-13-1 Category 3 (24/12/2021)
225
Acute dermal toxicity- H311
Category 3
Acute inhalation H331
toxicity (vapors)-
Category 3
Skin corrosion/ H315
irritation- Category 2
Serious eye damage/ H318
eye irritation- Category
1
Skin sensitization- H334
Category 1
Carcinogenicity- H350
Category 1B
Reproductive toxicity- H361
Category 2
Specific target organ H335
toxicity (single
exposure)- Category 3
226
Flammable liquid- H225
4. Ethanol Ethanol Liquid Category 2 ThermoFisher 3 Y Y
(CAS No): Serious eye damage/ H319 SDS
64-17-5 eye irritation- Category (7/1/2022)
2
Carcinogenicity- H351
Category 2
Specific target organ H371
toxicity (single
exposure)- Category 2
Specific target organs, H335
respiratory system-
Category 3
227
Titanium Titanium Carcinogenicity- NIST
dioxide dioxide Category 2 SDS
(CAS N0): (17/12/2014)
13463-67-7
228
2) Form C: Work Unit Assessment
Table 6.12 Inhalation exposure assessment
229
Table 6.13 Dermal Assessment
230
3) Form D: Technical Controls
231
away ventilatio full face chemicals at work
from n respirato area including
heat and ry emergency
light response method.
Handling Ammonia Inhalation/ Secure Y Use non- Y Face Y Y 2
/Loading dermal cylinder sparking shield, PPE: To provide
the raw in an ventilatio safety and ensure workers
material upright n system glasses, using chemical
position, full face glove and goggle
store respirato whenever handling/
separatel ry, directly exposed to
y and protectiv the chemicals.
keep the e
container clothing,
closed. glove
Handling Titanium Inhalation Store in Y Well Y Face Y Y 2
/Loading dioxide tightly ventilate shield,
the closed d area safety
catalyst container glasses,
in a cool glove
232
6.8 Plant Start-Up and Shut Down Procedure
There are two key procedures in a chemical processing plant: starting up and
shutting down the facility in order to make it safer to operate and maintain while also
increasing its efficiency. There should be no complication in the start-up and shutdown
operation of these procedures, and the risk to people and the environment should be
minimized as a result. Starting and shutting down the plant requires consideration of
several critical factors.
The commissioning and startup of a process plant includes both new facilities
and the restarting of an existing facility following significant modifications. New plant
and equipment commissioning and startup involve significant technical and
organizational challenges. The initial startup of any plant, regardless of size, kind, or
sector, is a singular event. Therefore, the startup phase presents certain unique
challenges. Lack of experience in addressing these issues has repeatedly led in costly
and time-consuming launches. New equipment, processes, and technologies
necessitate training employees on how to use them safely and effectively. In order to
complete the commissioning of a new facility, it is necessary to carry out all of the
following steps: planning and preparation, mechanical completion and integrity
checks, P&ID checks and verification and commissioning and operational testing.
Furthermore, it is essential that all parties involved in the project maintain tight links
in order for the initiative to succeed. Below are the start-up procedures that can be
followed:
1. In order to ensure that the input valve covers are installed properly and
in accordance with the design specifications, the interiors of each tower and vessel
should be thoroughly inspected one last time.
233
2. Once the "turnaround worklist" is complete, make sure that all of the
equipment and associated wiring is back in place and working correctly.
4. Verify that the alarm circuits on the control loops of each instrument
are functioning properly.
8. Examine all the utilities, including the cooling water and power steam.
Ensure that all steam traps are operational.
9. Ensure that all safety valves have been checked and installed, and that
the block valve is in its corresponding functioning position.
10. Verify that all fire protection equipment, such as fire extinguishers,
water hoses, nozzles, and steam hoses, is in place and immediately usable.
11. Verify that all drains are unblocked and all water has been emptied from
the equipment.
12. Ensure that all flanges and man heads have good gaskets and are
assembled tightly.
234
13. The header for the safety valve, the blowdown line, and the flare system
have been successfully commissioned.
14. All needed shades and air-freeing devices are available, removed, or
fitted.
19. When the flow of reactants is initiated, the catalyst must be activated
and sufficiently heated for the reaction to begin.
To ensure the smooth start-up of the plant, the final phase of mechanical
completion and the preliminary activities for commissioning have been completed,
while simultaneously reducing the risk of danger for each piece of equipment in the
plant. (Banergi, 2011) The following activities are included in the final phase:
Plant shutdowns, also known as turnarounds, are among the most crucial
phases of a plant's operation. Possibilities exist for shutdowns to have either a
beneficial or negative impact on the plant's financial future. A poorly planned
shutdown that exceeds its deadline or budget can have a detrimental effect on the
plant's profitability. A well-planned and executed plant turnaround can have a
235
favorable impact on the facility and allow it to operate at capacity for years. Typically
occurring at least once a year, plant shutdowns are frequently required for operational
maintenance. Without maintenance shutdowns, a firm may be derailed by faulty
equipment without warning. Maintenance of equipment and machinery, such as the
pneumatic conveying system, is an essential aspect of a plant's annual schedule.
The purpose of a shutdown is to devise a strategy for halting all plant operations
in order to carry out maintenance, repairs, equipment replacements, and other internal
maintenance tasks that are absolutely essential. A wide range of reasons may
necessitate this, including boosting throughput, maintaining or repairing internal mass
transfer equipment, and upgrading the process itself. As a result, shutdowns are
regularly required by federal and state authorities in order to keep facilities free of
hazards and in compliance with legal requirements.
236
• The foundation for a plant shutdown.
Scoping (What to do) • Initial planning, scoping, and organization
occur during this phase.
The following are the procedures for shutting down the plant:
237
and other high-pressure processing systems, this is true. The typical working
conditions of a hydro processing unit (measured at the reactor outflow) range from 100
to 207 bar and from 315°C to 427°C (Plant Emergency Depressuring System, 2022).
The layout and design of a plant are key components of a company's overall
operations, both for boosting the production process's efficiency and fitting workers'
needs. Plant layout refers to the arrangement of physical facilities such as machinery,
equipment, and furniture within the factory building to achieve the quickest flow of
material at the lowest cost and with the fewest number of product transfers from the
receipt of raw materials to the shipment of finished goods. Plant planning is a method
for arranging machines, processes, and plant services within a factory to produce the
greatest quantity of high-quality goods at the lowest total cost of production. (Kiran,
2019) In conventional chemical processing plants, an ideal site would be divided into
individual plots by its primary road network, with additional access roads leading to
the bigger plots. However, plants in many industries may be too small for such a road
system. Larger plants may require two or more plots, and a site may comprise multiple
plots. (Chemical Engineering,2016)
238
When constructing the plant layout's preliminary design, the immediate
process unit is the most fundamental unit to consider. It must facilitate the most
efficient material flow, from the storage of raw materials through the finished product.
The product arrangement organises several workstations by the operating order of the
products they serve. This design is optimised for the mass production of highly
standardised, repeatable products and components. Other structures, such as the
administration office, medical centre, café, surau, and warehouse, must be arranged
closer to the main gate to reduce the travel time of staff members. The control room is
located near the process area to reduce the time a person must spend in the process
area when a problem arises. Three emergency assembly places are designated for the
workers: assembly areas 1, 2, and 3. The fire station is located near the relevant facility.
Accident response could be expedited, lowering the risk of staff injury. The material
storage and plant utilities are located near the process area to reduce the piping system's
cost and maximise the process's efficiency.
239
240
CHAPTER 7
PROCESS ECONOMY
7.1 Introduction
After designing the process design, the next stage is to calculate the significant
units involved in the operation using the Preliminary Estimate (Based on Individual
Factors, Method of Guthries, 1969, 1974) from Product and Design Principles
Synthesis, Analysis, and Evaluation by Warren D. Seider. A few aspects should be
addressed to explain the choice of the Guthrie technique. To begin, the Guthrie method
recommends conducting an economic analysis after developing an optimal process
design that includes complete mass and energy balance calculations, material
selection, and a finalized process and instrumentation diagram (P&ID) that is
integrated with process control configuration. In addition, the Guthrie technique
acknowledges that the cost of the base, supporting structures, and ladders, as well as
241
the electricity, insulation, and paint, will be the same regardless of the type of
construction material utilized.
CTBM in this equation stands for total bare-module cost and refers to the sum of
bare-module costs for all items involved in the process equipment. Csite refers to the
site development expenses stated briefly in the capital investment costs section. The
process buildings and non-process buildings are then classified as building costs,
Cbuildings. Offsite buildings, Coffsite facilities, on the other hand, include utility plants that
have their own utilities such as ponds, waste treatment, pollution control, offsite
tankage, and receiving and shipping facilities provided by the corporation.
Step 1:
Prepare an equipment list based on the process design, including the equipment
title, label, size, construction material, design temperature, and design pressure.
Step 2:
The data described in Step 1 are combined with f.o.b. equipment purchase cost
data and linked to equipment list cost and matching cost index, Ib, of cost data. The
f.o.b. purchase cost in the Guthrie method is a base cost based on a near-ambient design
pressure, carbon steel as a building material, and a base design cost.
242
Step 3:
After then, the cost data is brought up to date in accordance with the most
recent cost index. Bare-module factors, FBM, are used to calculate the equipment's
bare-module cost. Be cautious when calculating non-carbon steel of construction
material equipment and/or the pressure of the equipment is not near ambient. The
Guthrie method's f.o.b. purchasing cost equation is as follows:
𝐼𝑖
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = ( ) 𝐶𝑝 [𝐹𝐵𝑀 + (𝐹𝑑 𝐹𝑝 𝐹𝑚 − 1)]
𝐼𝑏𝑖
Where;
𝐹𝐵𝑀 = bare module cost
𝐹𝑑 = equipment design factor
𝐹𝑝 = pressure factor
𝐹𝑚 = material factor
Step 4:
The total bare-module cost, CTBM is calculated by adding the bare-module costs
of process equipment.
Step 5:
The costing of the major and auxiliary equipment involved in this plant will be
discussed in this section in order to obtain the total capital investment estimation cost,
which is important in determining the overall profitability of a plant and ensuring that
243
the plant runs smoothly without any production losses to the company. This
Acrylonitrile Production Plant includes 1 reactor, 2 flash columns, 1 distillation
column and 1 absorption column. This section will also cover auxiliary equipment
such as a heat exchanger, heater, and cooler.
In the chemical engineering design of the fluidized bed reactor (R-101) for the
synthesis of ACN from ammonia and ethyl acrylate, a few key assumptions should be
made and followed. The following are the assumptions:
244
For the preliminary design, the reactor is made of carbon steel with dimension
of 6.99 m in diameter and 20.53 m in length. The purchase cost of reactor, CP where
FM is the material factor of carbon steel, CV is the reactor cost and CPL represents
platforms and ladders cost are adapted from a textbook of Chemical Engineering
Design (Seider et al., 2017).
𝑉 =𝑄×𝑡
Where;
The volumetric flowrate is calculate using the formula below (Fogler, 2013):
𝐹𝐴 𝑅𝑇
𝑣=
𝑦𝐴 𝑃
Where;
245
𝑅 : ideal gas constant (8.314 Pa. m3/mol. K)
𝑇 : temperature (K)
𝑦𝐴 : mole fraction of A
Equation below can be used to compute the inside diameter using the stated
ratio.
1⁄3
4𝑉
Internal Diameter, 𝐷𝑖 = [ ]
𝜋 × 𝐿𝐷 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜
Therefore, the height of the diameter can be calculated by using the relationship of the
ratio assume with the inner diameter calculator.
Height, 𝐿 = 3 × 𝐷𝑖
The formula used to determine the minimum thickness of the wall of cylindrical
reactor is shown below.
𝑃𝑑 𝐷𝑖
𝑡𝑝 =
2𝑆𝐸 − 1.2𝑃𝑑
Where;
246
𝑆 : Maximum allowable stress, N/mm2
𝐶 : Corrosion allowance, mm
Purchase Cost
To calculate freight (free) on board purchase cost, CV of the empty vessel, the
size factor (Weight, W) needs to be determined using equation below.
Where;
𝑡𝑠 : wall thickness, m
Hence, the F.O.B of the purchase cost can be calculated using the equation
below.
247
𝐶𝑉 = exp [7.1390 + 0.18255(ln 𝑊) + 0.02297 (ln 𝑊) 2 ]
Where;
CPL is the additional cost for platforms and ladders, which is determined by the
vessel's internal diameter, and is calculated using the equation below for a vertical
pressure vessel.
Where,
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝑉 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿
248
Delivery, insurance, taxes, and installation labor are all included in the
bare-module costs. The bare-module cost factor for a vertical pressure vessel is 4.16
and the total bare module factor, CBM is therefore determined using the following
equation.
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 × 𝐶𝑃
249
L:D ratio 3
Internal diameter, Di 6.844 m 6844 mm
Outer diameter, Do 6.990 m 6900 mm
Length, L 20.53 m 20530 mm
Minimum wall thickness, tp 19.05 mm
Corrosion allowance, tc 0.002 m
Average thickness, tv 23.00 mm
Baffle cut 1.75 m
Head and closure 50.98 mm
Shell thickness 21.00 mm
Mass of vessel, Wv 116,429.55 kg
Weight of vessel, Wv 1,142,173.55 N
Mass of insulation, Wi 2,869.51 kg
Weight of insulation, Wi 28,149.93 N
Mass of catalyst 5928.82 kg
Weight of catalyst 58,161.77 N
Total mass, Wt 180,330.34 kg
Total weight, N 1,769,040.65 N
Gas Distributor Plate
Type of plate Perforated plate
Hole diameter 647.25 mm
Plate thickness 200.00 mm
Head and Closure
Type Formed flat plate
Diameter to height ratio 1:3
Head thickness 50.98 mm
Reactor Support
Type Straight cylindrical skirt (𝜃= 90°)
Material Carbon steel
Design stress, S 79.29 N/mm2
Wind loading, fw 8,947.24 N/m
Skirt support diameter, Ds 6.990 m
Skirt thickness, ts 23 mm
Skirt support height, Hs 3.00 m
Total weight including the skirt
support, WT 9,179 kN
Base ring and Anchor Bolts
Bolt spacing 600.00 mm
Bolt diameter 277.02 mm
Bolt Area 60,273.54 mm2
Circumference of bolt circle 6283.185 mm
Base ring thickness 36 mm
Number of bolts required 12
250
Type of bolt M24
Costing
Material factor, FM 1.0
Cost for column, CV ($USD) 31,294.36
Platform and ladders, CPL ($USD) 14,393.86
Purchase cost, CP ($USD) 45,688.22
Bare module cost, CBM ($USD) 190,063.01
Bare module cost, CBM (RM) 836.277.26
In this plant operation, it consists of two equipment that applied the flash
separation technique. It is F-101 and F-102. This equipment is basically are used to
separate the component with different phase. For the first flash separator vessel, F-
101, the equipment is mainly used to separate the large amount of ammonia gas from
the liquid mixture after the cooling process. For the second flash separator, F-102, it is
used to separate the main product, Acrylonitrile from the other component and plus to
increase the purity of the product.
In order to obtained the purchase cost and bare module cost of the equipment,
it is necessary to calculate all the component required related to the design and
measurement of the vessel. It includes the diameter of the vessel, total weight and
design pressure of the flash separator. All the summary details of the calculation have
been recorded in Table 7.2. and Table 7.3.
In order to estimate the bare module cost of the flash vessel, this parameter
should be calculated first. The column diameter indicates the internal width of the
cylindrical column. Column diameter will depend on the volumetric flowrate of the
fluid that will enter the column. The value of vapor volumetric flowrate was calculated
first in order to be used in diameter calculation. The formula to calculate the vapor
volumetric flowrate is as shown below;
251
𝑀𝑣
Vapor volumetric flowrate, 𝑉𝑣 =
3600 × 𝜌𝑣
where 𝑀𝑣 is the mass flowrate of the vapor outlet. The 𝑉𝑣 value obtained will
be forwarded into the formula to find the column diameter (Towler & Sinnott, 2011).
The formula is as shown below;
4𝑉
𝐷𝑣 = √𝜋𝑢𝑣
𝑡
where 𝐷𝑣 is the minimum vessel diameter of the flash separator. Then, column
height, 𝐻𝑣 indicate the minimum height required for the process in the cylindrical
column. Column height will depend on the volumetric flowrate of the liquid that will
enter the column. The value of liquid volumetric flowrate was calculated first in order
to be used in diameter calculation (Towler & Sinnott, 2011). The formula to calculate
the liquid volumetric flowrate is as shown below;
𝑀𝑙
Liquid volumetric flowrate, 𝑉𝑙 =
3600 × 𝜌𝑙
where 𝑀𝑙 is the mass flowrate of the liquid outlet. The 𝑉𝑙 value obtained will
be forwarded into the formula to find the hold-up volume. Hold up volume basically
is based on the hold-up time necessary for a smooth operation and control. Usually,
the hold-up time that is allowed is 10 minutes (Towler & Sinnott, 2011). Therefore,
the hold-up volume, 𝑉ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑑 is calculated using the formula;
𝑠
𝑉ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑑 = 𝑉𝑙 × (10 min× 60 )
𝑚𝑖𝑛
252
Then, the hold-up volume will be divided with vessel cross-sectional area to
obtain the liquid depth required,ℎ𝐿 .
𝐷𝑣2
𝑉𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑙 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 − 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎, 𝐴 = 𝜋 ( )
4
Therefore;
𝑉ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑑
ℎ𝐿 =
𝐴
According to Gavin Towler and Ray Sinnott (2011), the ℎ𝐿 value should be
added with 0.3m of height increment to allow the space to located the level controller.
The value of column height, 𝐻𝑣 was obtained using the formula below;
𝐷𝑣
𝐻𝑣 = ℎ𝐿 + + 𝐷𝑣 + 0.3𝑚
2
2
𝑃𝑑 = 𝑒 [0.60608+0.91615(𝑙𝑛𝑃𝑜 )+0.0015655(𝑙𝑛𝑃𝑜) ]
𝑃𝑑 = 𝑃𝑜 × 1.1
253
Column Dead Weight,𝑊𝑣 indicates the total weight of the vessel that includes
the shell of the vessel, nozzles, plates and also insulator. For this process, parts that
need to be included as the column dead weight is the vessel shell and the insulator.
The formula used calculate the total weight of the vessel is;
𝑊𝑣 = 240𝐶𝑤 𝐷𝑚 𝐻𝑣 + 0.8 𝐷𝑚 )𝑡
Where;
𝐶𝑤 = a factor to account for the weight of nozzles (1.08 for vessels with only a few
internal fittings)
Therefore, the mean diameter of the vessel should be calculated first before
calculating the column dead weight. For this vessel, since the material used is carbon
steel, the insulation material that is used will be mineral wool with the density of
mineral wool, 𝜌𝑖 of 130kg/𝑚3 . Therefore, the volume of insulation, 𝑉𝑖 can be
determined using the formula;
𝑉𝑖 = 𝜋 × 𝐷𝑖 × 𝐻𝑣 × 𝑡𝑖
𝑊𝑖 = 𝑉𝑖 × 𝜌𝑖 × g
254
Where g is the gravitational acceleration, 9.81m/𝑠 2 .Then, the weight of
insulator value obtained should be double to allow for fittings and sealing. Thus, the
total weight of the vessel is equivalent to the total addition of 𝑊𝑖 and 𝑊𝑣 .
After obtaining the total weight of the flash vessel, the value will be applied to
calculated the cost estimation of the flash column. The cost estimation is one of the
necessary aspects that need to be considered during designing the process plant. The
capital cost estimation is usually based on the purchase of the major equipment items
in the process (Seider et al., 2016). For this individual part, the purchase cost, 𝐶𝑝 of
flash separator (F-102) was calculated first using the formula given;
𝐶𝑝 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝑣 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿
Firstly, the Materials of Construction Factors, 𝐹𝑀 was obtained from the Table
16.26 in the Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and
Evaluation, 4th Edition book. From this book, the material factor for carbon steel
material is equal to 1.0. Then, the value of cost of empty vessel, 𝐶𝑣 for the vertical
vessel was calculated using the formula;
2]
𝐶𝑣 = 𝑒 [7.1390+0.18255(ln 𝑊)+0.02297(ln 𝑊)
Then, the added cost, 𝐶𝑃𝐿 should be calculated in order to be added to the
equation for purchase cost. The added cost should to be considered in the calculation
since the vessel comes with the outer part such as platform and ladder. Therefore;
255
Where 𝐷𝑖 is internal diameter of vessel in ft and L is the height of vessel in ft.
Therefore, inserting all the information into the purchase cost, 𝐶𝑝 formula. Thus, bare
module cost can be calculated based on the following equation with the bare module
factor, FBM is equal to 4.16.
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐶𝑝 × 𝐹𝐵𝑀
OPERATING CONDITION
Temperature 298.15K
Pressure 1 bar
VESSEL DESIGN
WEIGHT OF COLUMN
STRESS ANALYSIS
256
Different in principal stress 8.93 N/𝑚𝑚2
DESIGN OF NOZZLES
EQUIPMENT COSTING
Operating Condition
Temperature 298.15K
Pressure 1 bar
Vessel Design
Domed Head Type Ellipsoidal
Minimum Wall Thickness 2.4235mm
Weight Of Column
Weight of vessel 0.4259kN
Weight of Insulation 2.5897kN
Total Dead Weight 3.0156kN
Stress Analysis
257
Pressure Stress 15.5307N/𝑚𝑚2
Longitudinal Stress 7.7654 N/𝑚𝑚2
Dead Weight Stress 0.7759 N/𝑚𝑚2
Bending Stress 1.9405 N/𝑚𝑚2
Resultant longitudinal stress(upwind) 10.4818 N/𝑚𝑚2
Resultant of longitudinal stress 6.6007 N/𝑚𝑚2
(downwind)
Different in principal stress 8.93 N/𝑚𝑚2
Critical buckling stress 94.5131 N/𝑚𝑚2
Design Of Nozzles
Feed nozzle diameter 2.1863mm
Top nozzle diameter 2.1131mm
Bottom Nozzle diameter 2.2021mm
Equipment Costing
Material Factor 1.0
Cost of empty vessel, Cv (USD) 10995.67
Cost of platform and ladders, CpL 39.66
Purchase cost, Cp (USD) 11035.33
Bare Module Factor, FBM 4.16
Bare Module Cost, CBM (USD) 45906.97
Bare Module Cost, CBM (RM) 202312.02
The f.o.b. purchase cost of the distillation column using carbon steel as material
of construction including allowance for platforms, ladders, a nominal number of
nozzles and manholes, and trays installation in vacuum vessel is given by:
𝐶𝐵𝑇 = 468𝑒𝑥𝑝(0.1482𝐷𝑖 )
258
𝐶𝑇 = 𝑁𝑇 𝐹𝑁𝑇 𝐹𝑇𝑇 𝐹𝑇𝑀 𝐶𝐵𝑇
𝐼2021
𝐶𝑝 = (𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝑣 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿 + 𝐶𝑇 ) ( )
𝐼𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒,2013
Where;
𝑁𝑇 = number of trays
259
Lastly, the bare-module cost (𝐶𝐵𝑀 ) is calculated by multiplying the purchase
cost, 𝐶𝑝 with a ratio of cost index, I at that later date to a base cost index, Ibase, and the
bare-module factor (𝐹𝐵𝑀 ) which is 4.16.
𝐼𝑖
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = ( ) 𝐹 × 𝐶𝑝
𝐼𝑏𝑖 𝐵𝑀
260
Column Cross-Section Area, m2 0.8771
Shell Thickness, mm 9
Design Temperature, °C 308.15
Design Pressure, bar 2.2
Insulation Materials Mineral Wool
Insulation Thickness, mm 50
Tray Type Sieve
Tray Material Carbon Steel SA-508
Liquid Flow Arrangement Reverse Flow
Number of Trays 46
Feed Point Location (From Top) 30
Number of Holes 3573
Tray Thickness, mm 5
Tray Diameter, m 1.06
Tray Spacing, m 0.45
Hole Diameter, mm 5
Hole Area, m2 0.00001963
Hole Pitch, mm 2000
Net Area, m2 0.7894
Active Area, m2 0.7017
Downcomer Area, m2 0.0877
Weir Length, m 0.7738
Weir Height, mm 50
Calming Zone Width, mm 50
Area of Calming Zone, m2 82.38
Turn-down, % 70
Downcomer Material Carbon Steel SA-508
Downcomer backup (hb), mm 178.99
Downcomer Height (Apron), mm 40
Pressure drops per plate, mm
56.04
liquid
261
Residence time per plate, s 10.29
Flooding Percentage, % 80
Type of Head Torispherical
Head and Closure Thickness,
0.4036
mm
Weight of Shell, N 65476.76
Weight of Plates, N 48712.53
Weight of Insulation, N 5032.5309
Skirt Material Carbon Steel SA-508
Skirt Thickness, mm 9
Skirt Height, m 3
Skirt Base Angle 90°
Nozzle Material Carbon Steel sch 40
Nozzle Diameter, m
D1 0.9535
D2 0.0843
D3 0.0276
D4 0.6391
D5 0.0130
Typer of Base Ring Double Ring Stiffened by Gussets
Base Ring Thickness, mm 15
Base Ring Diameter, m 0.135
Bolt Material Stainless Steel
Number of Bolts 12
Bolt Diameter, mm 25
Pitch Circle Diameter, m 2
Equipment Costing
Base cost of tray, CBT ($USD) 738.57
Cost for installed trays, CT
45007.73
($USD)
Material Factor, FM 1.00
262
Cost for column, CV ($USD) 60264.05
Platforms and ladders, CPL
24609.85
($USD)
Purchase cost, CP ($USD) 150987.84
Bare module factor, FBM 4.16
Bare module cost, CBM ($USD) 468216.44
Bare module cost, CBM (RM) 2060162.34
Since acrylonitrile is the main product in our process, absorption columns were
utilised to separate it from a vapour mixture of ethanol, acrylonitrile, water, ethyl
acrylate, and ammonia in this chemical plant. To absorb the ethanol from the mixes,
dimethyl sulfoxide was utilised as a liquid solvent. Following the separation process,
acrylonitrile will flow upwards as a vapour, while ethanol will flow below as a liquid
solution with the solvent.
It's commonly done in vertical counter-current columns. The liquid solvent will
be fed into the system from the top of the absorption columns, while the vapour
mixture will flow from the bottom inlet. The vapour mixture will then begin to float
upwards, while the liquid solvent will flow downhill. The liquid solvent will wash off
any contaminants or absorbed components from the vapour mixes, allowing them to
flow downhill into the liquid solution at the bottom of the absorption column. The
clean vapour then flows upwards into the absorption columns' top outlet. When
calculating the cost of a purchase, certain factors must be considered Table 7.7 shows
the equipment specification sheet of absorption column.
In the absence of considerations for corrosion, wind, and earthquakes, and for
internal pressures larger than the exterior pressure, the cylindrical shell wall thickness
is determined using the ASME pressure vessel code formula.
263
𝑃𝑑 𝐷𝑖
𝑡𝑝 =
2𝑆𝐸 − 1.2𝑃𝑑
Where,
𝑆 is maximum allowable stress of the shell material at the design temperature in pounds
per square inch,
264
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝑉 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿
After that, the added cost, 𝐶𝑃𝐿 for platforms and ladders depends on the inside
diameter and the length of the column, in feet is given by;
Then, for material of construction factor, 𝐹𝑀 is given in the Table 7.5 below.
After that, the bare-module cost needs to be calculated. The bare-module cost,
𝐶𝐵𝑀 or installed cost is calculated using the bare-module factor, 𝐹𝐵𝑀 and the
equipment’s free-on-board (f.o.b., excluding delivery costs). The bare-module factor,
𝐹𝐵𝑀 can be obtain from Table 7.6 below;
265
From the table, the 𝐹𝐵𝑀 for this vertical pressure vessel is 4.16. To
calculate the 𝐶𝐵𝑀 , the equation below is used;
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐶𝑃 × 𝐹𝐵𝑀
266
Absorption Column (C-102)
Item Absorption Column Date 25.4.2022
Item No C-102 Nur Alia Farhana Binti Ros
By
No. of unit 1 Madi
Function To separate ethanol from gas mixture using DMSO as solvent
Operation Continuous Operation
Operating Data
Stream TOP INLET BOTTOM INLET TOP OUTLET BOTTOM OUTLET
Temperature, K 343.15 343.15 343.15 343.15
Pressure, atm 1 1 1 1
Liquid Density (kg/m^3) 1100
Vapor Density (kg/m^3) 31.31500348
Composition (kg/hr)
Ethanol 0 6102.298124 305.11 5797.18
Acrylonitrile 0 7005.752305 7005.75 0.00
Dimethyl Sulfoxide 10000 0 0.00 10000.00
Water 0 12.41851908 12.42 0.00
Ethyl Acrylate 0 5.949530836 5.95 0.00
Ammonia 0 0.400997316 0.40 0.00
Total mass flowrate 10000 13126.81948 7329.64 15797.18
Chemical Design
Column Diameter, m 1.90 Column Height, m 7.71
Vapor Volumetric Flowrate, Pressure Drop, mmH2O/m
419.19 16.71
m^3/h packing
Liquid Holdup, m 3.52E-07 Wetting Rate, m^2/s 7.35E-06
Mechanical Design
Design Pressure, atm 1.1 Design Temperature, K 348.15
267
7.2.5 Heater (E-103 and E-104)
In this plant design, two heaters are employed to boost the temperature of
streams E-103 and E-104. The identification of heaters is accomplished by conducting
process integration and designing heater to determine how many heaters are required
to transfer heat efficiently in support of heaters. As a heating medium, the heaters
utilized hot steam to boost the temperature of the stream. In this facility, all heaters
used a shell-and-tube layout with counterflow to enhance heat transfer. Based on
preliminary research, the shell and tube heater are the most suited heater for increasing
the temperature of fluids in liquid or gaseous form (Albrecht, 2004).
The cost of purchase, Cp for all of our heaters can be done by using the
following formula;
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
Where;
CB is bare cost,
268
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
Where;
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
Where;
However, only equipment with a psig value over 100 should be considered,
and since our maximum psig is only at 58.07, the pressure factor will not be included
in the purchase cost. Lastly, to calculate our cost of purchase, the bare cost should also
be calculated, and it can be done by using the following formula;
Thus, in calculating the surface area of the heat exchanger A is a cross sectional
area of shell tube using the equation below,
269
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
Where;
Then, in calculating log mean temperature difference, ΔTLM below is the equation used
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Where;
270
Equipment Specification sheet
Item no. Heater (E-103)
Function To increase the temperature from
300.25oC to 310oC
Type of fluid Steam
Material of Construction
Shell Carbon Steel
Tube Stainless Steel
Operating Conditions
Tube Side Shell Side
Inlet 300.25 Inlet Temperature 300
Temperature(oC) (oC)
Outlet 310 Outlet Temperature 290
Temperature (oC) (oC)
Pressure (psig) 58.015 Pressure(psig) 58.015
Heat duty (W) 96400 Log Mean 10.124
Temperature
Driving force,
ΔTLM (oC)
Heat Transfer 1500 Tube Length, ft 12
Coefficient, U
(W/m2C)
Surface area, ft2 6.347 Tube length factor, 1.25
FL
Pressure Factor, FP 0.99
Material Factor, Fm 2.70
Base cost, CB (RM) 54130.95
Purchase cost, Cp (RM) 283052.90
Bare module factor, FBM 3.17
Bare module cost, CBM ($USD) 203 926.78
Bare module cost, CBM (RM) 897 277.80
271
Table 7.9 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heater (E-104)
Equipment Specification sheet
Item no. Heater (E-104)
Function To increase the temperature from
270.16oC to 310oC
Type of fluid Steam
Material of Construction
Shell Carbon Steel
Tube Stainless Steel
Operating Conditions
Tube Side Shell Side
Inlet Temperature 270.16 Inlet Temperature 280
(oC) (oC)
Outlet 310 Outlet Temperature 270
Temperature (oC) (oC)
Pressure (psig) 58.015 Pressure(psig) 58.015
Heat duty (W) 72 000 Log Mean 5.7625
Temperature
Driving force,
ΔTLM (oC)
272
Bare module cost, CBM (RM) 784 174.90
Coolers E-106, E-107 and E-108 are designed using the same shell and tube
heat exchanger theory as heaters as previously stated, but in a different manner that
removes heat from the system. All the coolers utilized water as the medium for cooling.
The concept of releasing heat from the process stream through shell-and-tube heat
exchangers remains the same, but with different operating conditions and temperatures
in which cooling water is utilized as the cooling agent. Therefore, the operational
design summary for all coolers is provided below.
The cost of purchase, Cp for all of our cooler can be done by using the following
formula;
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
Where;
CB is bare cost,
273
combination of stainless-steel tube and carbon steel shell is our material's most cost-
effective and dependable solution. To calculate the material factor, FM, the following
formula will be utilised:
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
Where;
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
Where;
However, only equipment with a psig value over 100 should be considered,
and since our maximum psig is only at 58.07, the pressure factor will not be included
in the purchase cost. Lastly, to calculate our cost of purchase, the bare cost should also
be calculated, and it can be done by using the following formula;
274
𝐶𝐵 = exp[ 11.551 − 0.9186[ln(𝐴)] + 0.09790 [ln(𝐴)]2 ]
Thus, in calculating the surface area of the heat exchanger A is a cross sectional
area of shell tube using the equation below,
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
Where;
Then, in calculating log mean temperature difference, ΔTLM below is the equation used
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Where;
275
t2 is an outlet of cold fluid temperature
Material of Construction
Operating Conditions
276
Material Factor, Fm 2.46
Material of Construction
Operating Conditions
277
Heat Transfer 1500 Tube Length, ft 12
Coefficient, U
(W/m2C)
278
Heat duty (W) 1396130 Log Mean 4.995
Temperature
Driving force,
ΔTLM (oC)
The most typical type heat exchanger that will be employed is a shell and tube
unit. Finned tubes, single- or two-phase heat transfer, counter-current flow, co-current
flow, or crossflow arrangements, as well as single, two, or multiple pass configurations
are the several types of flow configurations for heat exchangers. Counter-current flow
279
is the arrangement utilised in the plant because it distributes heat more evenly and
allows for maximum efficiency. Table 7.13, Table 7.14, and Table 7.15 show the
equipment specification sheet for all the heat exchangers.
The cost of purchase, Cp for all of our heat exchanger can be done by using the
following formula;
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
Where;
CB is bare cost,
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
Where;
280
Chapter 16 of Warren D. Seider's Product and Process Design Principle
provides the values for 𝑎 and 𝑏. Similarly, the tube length factor was obtained from
the same chapter. The tube length factor is approximately 1.25 after assuming a tube
length of 12 feet for every heat exchanger. On the other hand, the following formula
will be used to compute the pressure factor for our heat exchanger:
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
Where;
However, only equipment with a psig value over 100 should be considered,
and since our maximum psig is only at 58.07, the pressure factor will not be included
in the purchase cost. Lastly, to calculate our cost of purchase, the bare cost should also
be calculated, and it can be done by using the following formula;
Thus, in calculating the surface area of the heat exchanger A is a cross sectional
area of shell tube using the equation below,
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
Where;
281
U is an overall heat transfer coefficient
Then, in calculating log mean temperature difference, ΔTLM below is the equation used
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Where;
282
Tube Side Shell Side
Inlet -40 Inlet Temperature 310
Temperature (oC)
(oC)
Outlet 300 Outlet 45
Temperature Temperature
(oC) (oC)
Pressure (psig) 58.015 Pressure(psig) 58.015
Heat duty (W) 3,276,650 Log Mean 35.05
Temperature
Driving force,
ΔTLM (oC)
283
Material of Construction
Shell Carbon Steel
Tube Stainless Steel
Operating Conditions
Tube Side Shell Side
Inlet 70 Inlet Temperature 183.9
Temperature (oC)
(oC)
Outlet 270.16 Outlet 45
Temperature Temperature
(oC) (oC)
Pressure (psig) 58.015 Pressure(psig) 58.015
Heat duty (W) 1,654,860 Log Mean 49.46
Temperature
Driving force,
ΔTLM (oC)
284
Table 7.15 Equipment Specification Sheet of Heat Exchanger (E-105)
285
Material Factor, Fm 2.54
Base cost, CB (RM) 53,986.87
Purchase cost, Cp (RM) 191,285.80
Bare module factor, FBM 3.17
Bare module cost, CBM (RM) 606,376.1
A pump is a part of the basic equipment in any plant that is used to move fluids
through a piping system from one type of equipment to another and to increase the
pressure of the process fluid. A centrifugal pump is used in this plant because it is
relatively inexpensive to buy and easy to assemble. It also has a wide range of materials
for construction and can handle slurries really well. The material used for the P-101
and P-102 is stainless steel because ammonia and ethyl acrylate flow through these
pumps, respectively. Ammonia has alkaline properties and is corrosive. Hence, using
stainless steel as the material of the pumps is a good choice because stainless steel is
resistant to corrosion and oxidation. Pumps that are made from stainless steel are also
resistant to solvents, acids, sea water, brine, and other chemicals. In our case, pumps
are mainly used to pump ammonia and ethyl acrylate into the reactor. P-101 and P-102
are the labels for the two pumps. Pump head, brake horsepower, size factor, material
factor, and type factor are all factors to consider when calculating a pump.
To begin the calculation, the size factor is calculated using the following
equation:
𝑆 = 𝑄(𝐻)0.5
Where:
286
H is pump head (ft)
The pump head value can be calculated by dividing the pressure rise by the
pump in accordance with the density of the liquid ammonia. The base purchase cost is
then computed using formula depicted below.
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑇 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝐵
After calculating the 𝐶𝑃 of the pump, the cost of the electric motor is
considered, as centrifugal pumps are typically driven by an electric motor. First, the
value of 𝑃𝐶 's horsepower consumption is calculated using the following equation:
𝑃𝑇 𝑃𝐵 𝑄𝐻𝜌
𝑃𝐶 = = =
𝜂𝑃 𝜂𝑀 𝜂𝑀 30000𝜂𝑃 𝜂𝑀
Where:
287
The following equation is used to calculate the value of 𝜂𝑃 , which
estimates the value as a function of the volumetric flow rate, Q, for Q values ranging
from 50 to 50,000 gpm.
On the other hand, the following equation is used to determine the value of 𝜂𝑀
𝑃𝑇
for 𝑃𝐵 values ranging from 1 to 1,500 Hp. Using the above equation, 𝑃𝐶 = 𝜂 =
𝑃 𝜂𝑀
𝑃𝐵 𝑄𝐻𝜌
= 30000𝜂 , the value can be calculated.
𝜂𝑀 𝑃 𝜂𝑀
Once the value of horsepower consumption, 𝑃𝐶 , has been determined, the base
cost, 𝐶𝐵 , can be calculated using the equation below.
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑇 𝐶𝐵
288
Table 7.16 Equipment Specification Sheet of Pump (P-101)
289
7.3 Waste Treatment Cost
Waste management is crucial in any chemical plant since the main production
necessitates compliance with the Environmental Quality Act's discharge standards and
regulations (EQA). As a result, the cost of waste disposal must be included in the
overall cost of the operation. In this plant, the waste that need to be treated is discharge
from the reactor (R-101), flash column (F-101), distillation column (C-101),
absorption column (C-102) and flash column (F-102) with 313 days of plant operation.
The waste streams for liquid wastes are summarized in Table 7.18.
Average
Mass Density Mass flowrate
Equipment Substances density
Fraction (kg/m3) (kg/hr)
(kg/m3)
Distillation Water 0.79 997 2392.08 787.63
column (C-101) Ethyl acrylate 0.19 940 588.52 178.60
Absorption DMSO 0.37 1100 10000 407.00
Column (C-102) Ethanol 0.63 789 5782.53 497.07
Total 18763.13 1870.30
𝑘𝑔 𝑚3 24 ℎ𝑟 365 𝑑𝑎𝑦
= 18763.13 × × × = 87, 881.63 𝑚3 /𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
ℎ𝑟 1870.30 𝑘𝑔 1 𝑑𝑎𝑦 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
290
= $29, 000.94 × 4.4 = 𝑅𝑀 127, 604.13
Utilities are one of the key expenses that must be included in the company's
financial accounts while operating a chemical plant. The most typical utilities
consumed in this acrylonitrile production plant are steam, electricity, cooling water,
and process water. Table 7.19 shows the allocated cost for the utilities of this plant.
1. Steam
= 930 × 42,379.550.81
= $5,205,705.16
= 𝑅𝑀22,905,102.71
2. Electricity
291
Assuming power supply of 0.5 MW
= 2,900,000 × 0.50.81
= $1,702,285.93
= 𝑅𝑀7,490,058.08
3. Cooling water
= 1,100 × 10000.68
= $120,612.60
= 𝑅𝑀530,695.45
4. Process water
292
= 1,700 × 100.96
= $15,504.18
= 𝑅𝑀68,218.41
For estimation labor cost, the assumptions were made for this plant as follows:
Assumptions:
3. 3 weeks of vacation are off and sick leave for each operator.
293
E-101
Heat
3 E-102 3 3 9
Exchanger
E-105
E-103
Heater 2 2 3 6
E-104
E-106
Cooler 3 E-107 3 3 9
E-108
Total of operators 39
The labor cost in Malaysia is around RM 1,555 per month multiply with the
total number of operators which is 39. Hence, the total operating labor cost is around
RM 60,645 per month and RM 727,740 per year respectively.
In this plant, ammonia and ethyl acrylate are the raw materials. Specifically,
the total required ammonia and ethyl acrylate per year is estimated to be 122,640 and
52,560 tonne/year respectively with the operation of 313 days/year which is
44weeks/year. The annual cost of catalyst is to be assumed as 1% of the raw material
cost (Towler & Sinnott. 2013). Table 7.21 below shows the raw material cost per year.
294
Raw Material Market Price Raw Material
Raw Material
Capacity (tonne/year) (RM/tonne) Cost (RM/year)
By using the equation stated below, the value of the profit margin is:
Therefore, the acrylonitrile production plant was estimated profitable since the
profit margin is in positive value.
295
7.7 Total Capital Investment
The total capital investment is a one-time cost for designing, building, and
starting a new factory. In order to calculate the total capital investment (CTPI), the
Guthrie method is used which is shown below.
Where CTPI is total permanent investment while CWC is the working capital.
Meanwhile, the total permanent investment (CTPI) is calculated using equation below.
Where the total bare-module cost, CTBM refers to the summation of the bare
module cost of each equipment that has been calculated previously. Csite is the total
site cost in which this acrylonitrile plant is assumed grassroot and there is an additional
integrated complex. Meanwhile, Cbuildings which is the total building cost includes
process buildings and non-process buildings. The overall cost of offsite facilities,
Coffsite facilities, includes the costs of utility plants for which the plant offers facilities for
its own employees. Furthermore, total depreciable capital (CTDC) is the value of a fixed
asset less all accumulated depreciation reported against it. The factor 1.18 in the
equation below included a contingency of 15% and a contractor fee of 3%.
296
= 𝑅𝑀 30,994,074.65
= 0.15 × 𝑅𝑀 9,870,398.16
= 𝑅𝑀 1,480,559.72
= 0.2 × 𝑅𝑀 9,870,398.16
= 𝑅𝑀 1,974079.63
= 𝑅𝑀 31,487,594.56
= 𝑅𝑀 52,878,905.85
297
= 0.176 × 𝑅𝑀 52,496,649.69
= 𝑅𝑀 9,306,687.85
= 𝑅𝑀 52,878,905.85 + 𝑅𝑀 9,306,687.85
= 𝑅𝑀 62,185,593.28
Total depreciable cost equals the value of a fixed asset minus the cost
accumulated depreciation recorded against it. In a larger sense, depreciated cost is the
total amount of capital "used up" in a certain period, such as a fiscal year. The
298
depreciated cost can be analyzed for patterns in a company's capital investment and
how aggressive its accounting techniques are, as measured by how precisely
depreciation is calculated. The term "depreciated cost" is also used to refer to the
"salvage value," "net book value," or "adjusted cost base" (Hayes, 2021). Table 7.24
shows the total depreciable cost for this acrylonitrile production plant along with its
typical factor.
The total annual production cost is the sum of the cost of manufacture and
general expenses which as shown in the equation below.
299
depreciation. Then there are the general costs, which encompass departments such as
human resources, R&D, sales, and transportation. The annual cost estimation of the
acrylonitrile producing plant is described in Table 7.25.
300
Total depreciation, D 3,405,675.75
Total cost manufacture, COM 1,408,294,212
General expenses
Total annual
General expenses Typical factor
(RM)
Transfer expenses 3% of sales 86,704,007.78
Direct research 4.8% of sales 138,726,412.50
Allocated research 0.5% of sales 14,450,667.96
Administrative expense 2.0% of sales 57,802,671.86
Management incentive compensation 2.0% of sales 57,802,671.86
Total general expenses, GE 272,150,881.5
Total production cost, C COM+GE 1,680,445,093
The cash flow analysis diagram displays the entire flow of revenues and costs
during the plant's operation. Table 7.26 shows the cumulative cash flow, which may
be used to draw a cash flow diagram and calculate the payback period for a
acrylonitrile producing unit. The payback period of this plant is the amount of time it
takes for an investment to recoup its initial outlay in profits or savings. A graphical
representation of cumulative cash flow vs time period is required to calculate the
payback period. A set of computations, such as revenue, operating expenses, and cash
flow before and after tax, are required to construct the cumulative cash flow illustrated
in Table 7.26. A few assumptions have been made for this cash flow study.
1. For this acrylonitrile production plant, the total operating period is 20 years
with 3 years at the beginning as the start-up operation period.
2. For the first 3 years of operation, the plant is not going to reach maximum
operation. The revenue will be 20%, 50% and 90% of the maximum for year
1, 2, and 3 respectively.
301
3. The capital investment used in the first year of the plant is 50% from the total
capital investment CTCI which the second year is 30% of the CTCI. Meanwhile,
in the third year of operation, the remaining CTCI is made up of 20% capital
investment in the plant.
302
Table 7.26 Cash flow analysis for acrylonitrile production plant
Operating Operating Cash Flow
Annual Capital Depreciation, Taxable Cumulative
Year Revenue, R Expenses, Expenses, Taxes, Te After Taxes,
Investment, CTCI D Income, TI Cash Flow
OE CFBT CFAT
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 31092796.64 0 0 -31092796.64 0 0 0 -31092796.64 -31092796.64
2 18655677.98 0 0 -18655677.98 0 0 0 -18655677.98 -49748474.62
3 12437118.66 442521758.6 1680445093 -1250360453 3405675.748 -1241329011 -310332252.6 -940028200.8 -989776675.4
4 1106304396 1680445093 -574140696.9 3405675.748 -577546372.7 -144386593.2 -429754103.8 -1419530779
5 1991347914 1680445093 310902820.2 3405675.748 307497144.5 76874286.11 234028534.1 -1185502245
6 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 -785528051.5
7 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 -385553858
8 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 14420335.57
9 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 414394529.1
10 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 814368722.7
11 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 1214342916
12 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 1614317110
13 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 2014291303
14 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 2414265497
15 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 2814239690
16 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 3214213884
17 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 3614188078
18 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 4014162271
19 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 4414136465
20 2212608793 1680445093 532163699.5 3405675.748 528758023.7 132189505.9 399974193.5 4814110658
303
Cumulative Cash Flow for 0% Interest Rate
6,000,000,000.00
5,000,000,000.00
Cumulative Cash Flow (RM)
4,000,000,000.00
3,000,000,000.00
2,000,000,000.00
1,000,000,000.00
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-1,000,000,000.00
-2,000,000,000.00
Year
304
According to Table 7.27, the total capital investment, CTCI, is funded in the
first, second, and third years with varying percentages given in the assumption. The
graph in Figure 7.2 displays a negative number for cumulative annual cash flow for
the first 5.5 years. This is due to the fact that the investment necessary to develop and
build the facility spans three years. The cash flow curve then begins to rise in year 4
as the process begins to generate income from acrylonitrile sales, but the cumulative
cash flow remains negative due to the high capital investment, CTCI, which is finally
paid off in year 8.
The annual interest rate generated by the profits on the original investment is
known as the return on investment (ROI). ROI provides a comprehensive picture of
the plant's profitability. The production cost is determined using straight-line
depreciation for ROI and all approximate profitability indicators, and the plant is
assumed to operate at full capacity each year for the same number of days each year
following the starting period. ROI can be calculated using the equation below.
532,163,699.48
= × 100%
62185593.28
= 556.25%
Finally, it can be seen that the return of investment (ROI) of the acrylonitrile
production plant is 556.25%. Since the ROI is more than 100%, this indicates that the
305
investment is bringing profit towards the investors. However, if the ROI is less than
100%, the investments are unprofitable.
306
Table 7.27 Discounted Factor Cash Flow Analysis for Interest Rate of 5%, 10% and 15%
307
14 399974193.5 2414265497 202014147.2 1198764562 105325706.1 532112270.4 56527816 160279835.7
15 399974193.5 2814239690 192394425.9 1391158988 95750641.89 627862912.3 49154622.61 209434458.3
16 399974193.5 3214213884 183232786.6 1574391775 87046038.08 714908950.4 42743150.1 252177608.4
17 399974193.5 3614188078 174507415.8 1748899190 79132761.89 794041712.3 37167956.61 289345565
18 399974193.5 4014162271 166197538.8 1915096729 71938874.45 865980586.7 32319962.27 321665527.3
19 399974193.5 4414136465 158283370.3 2073380100 65398976.77 931379563.5 28104315.01 349769842.3
20 399974193.5 4814110658 150746067 2224126167 59453615.25 990833178.7 24438534.79 374208377.1
308
Payback Period at i = 0%, 5%, 10% and 15%
6,000,000,000.00
5,000,000,000.00
Cumulative Casf Flow (RM)
4,000,000,000.00
3,000,000,000.00
i = 0%
2,000,000,000.00 i=5%
i = 10%
1,000,000,000.00
i = 15%
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
-1,000,000,000.00
-2,000,000,000.00
Year
Figure 7.2 Discounted Factor Cash Flow Analysis for Interest Rate of 5%, 10% and 15%
309
Table 7.27 and Figure 7.2 are designed to examine the cumulative cash flow
trend at 0% discounted value and various discounted values of 5%, 10%, and 15%.
The present worth factor is a time value of money notion that varies depending on the
discounted value. The factor can be calculated using the Compound Interest Factor
Table found in Engineering Economic textbooks.
1
𝑃 =𝐹[ ]
(1 + 𝑖)𝑛
Where;
P = Present worth
F = Future worth
n = Number of years
i = Interest rate
According to Figure 7.2, the payback period is roughly 8.8, 9.8, and 11
years for the rates of 5%, 10%, and 15%, respectively, after three years of start-up.
Consequently, even if the acrylonitrile production plant's payback period is greater
than undiscounted (i = 0%) cash flow, the plant is still profitable to build. This is due
to the fact that equipment will be subjected to regular maintenance and services during
the operation time in order to ensure that the plant can operate for more than 15 years
while maintaining a good net profit value.
310
7.11 Conclusion
3. The total capital investment, CTCI for Year 1, 2 and 3 are RM 31,092,796.64, RM
18,655,677.98, and RM 12,437,118.66 respectively.
311
CHAPTER 8
CONCLUSION
8.1 Conclusion
312
REFERENCES
313
Busca, G. (2009). Bases and Basic Materials in Industrial and Environmental
Chemistry: A Review of Commercial Processes. Industrial and Engineering
Chemistry Research, 48(14), 6486–6511. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE801878D
Cartsos, G. (n.d.). Nitrile Gloves. Retrieved November 18, 2021, from
https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/2a3dc55f914642779b8508dae93a9980
Centi, G., Grasselli, R. K., & Trifiro, F. (1992). Propane ammoxidation to acrylonitrile
- an overview. Catalysis Today, 13(4), 661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-
5861(92)80106-W
CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED REACTOR - Chemical Engineering World. (2019).
Chemical Engineering World.
https://chemicalengineeringworld.com/circulating-fluidized-bed-reactor/
Cespi, D., Passarini, F., Neri, E., Vassura, I., Ciacci, L., & Cavani, F. (2014). Life
Cycle Assessment comparison of two ways for acrylonitrile production: the
SOHIO process and an alternative route using propane. Journal of Cleaner
Production, 69, 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2014.01.057
Department of Statistics Malaysia Official Portal. (n.d.). Retrieved November 18,
2021, from
https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/cthemeByCat&cat=476&
bul_id=U1ltVWpwNXRNRUR2NlhRSHZmenRMUT09&menu_id=Tm8zcn
RjdVRNWWlpWjRlbmtlaDk1UT09
Dimian, A. C., & Bildea, C. S. (2008). Acrylonitrile by Propene Ammoxidation.
Chemical Process Design, 313–338.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527621583.CH11
Environment and Climate Change Canada - Canada.ca. (n.d.). Retrieved November
19, 2021, from https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change.html
Foutch, G. L., & Johannes, A. H. (2003). Reactors in Process Engineering. In
Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Issue December 2003).
https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-227410-5/00654-2
Garagounis, I., Kyriakou, V., Skodra, A., Vasileiou, E., & Stoukides, M. (2014).
Electrochemical synthesis of ammonia in solid electrolyte cells. Frontiers in
Energy Research, 2(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2014.00001
314
Ghavam, S., Vahdati, M., Wilson, I. A. G., & Styring, P. (2021). Sustainable Ammonia
Production Processes. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 34.
https://doi.org/10.3389/FENRG.2021.580808/BIBTEX
Ghosh, P., Westhoff, P., & Debnath, D. (2019). Biofuels, food security, and
sustainability. Biofuels, Bioenergy and Food Security, 211–229.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803954-0.00012-7
Giannakis, E., Kushta, J., Bruggeman, A., & Lelieveld, J. (2019). Costs and benefits
of agricultural ammonia emission abatement options for compliance with
European air quality regulations. Environmental Sciences Europe, 31(1), 1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S12302-019-0275-0/TABLES/6
• Global plastic production 1950-2020 | Statista. (n.d.). Retrieved November 18, 2021,
from https://www.statista.com/statistics/282732/global-production-of-
plastics-since-1950/
Grace, J. R. (2000). Reflections on turbulent fluidization and dense suspension upflow.
Powder Technology, 113(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-
5910(00)00307-7
Grace, J. R., & Bi, H. (1997). Introduction to Circulating Fluidized Beds. Circulating
Fluidized Beds, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0095-0_1
Grasselli, R. K. (2011). Chapter 5:Ammoxidation of Propylene and Propane to
Acrylonitrile. 96–140. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781847559876-00096
Green, D. W., & Perry, R. H. (2008). Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook 8th
Edition (R. H. Perry (ed.); 8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
https://doi.org/10.1036/0071422943
Gundersen, T. (2013). Heat Integration: Targets and Heat Exchanger Network Design.
Handbook of Process Integration (PI): Minimisation of Energy and Water Use,
Waste and Emissions, 129–167. https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097255.2.129
Guerrero-Pérez, M. O., Peña, M. A., Fierro, J. L. G., & Bañares, M. A. (2006). A Study
about the Propane Ammoxidation to Acrylonitrile with an Alumina-Supported
Sb−V−O Catalyst. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 45(13),
4537–4543. https://doi.org/10.1021/IE051000G
Gumerov, F., Neindre, B., Bilalov, T., & Sagdeev, A. (2016). Regeneration of Spent
Catalyst and Impregnation of Catalyst by Supercritical Fluid. International
315
Journal Of Analytical Mass Spectrometry And Chromatography, 04(04), 51-
65. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijamsc.2016.44006
Hafeez, S., Pallari, E., Manos, G., & Constantinou, A. (2018). Catalytic conversion
and chemical recovery. In Plastics to Energy: Fuel, Chemicals, and
Sustainability Implications. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-
813140-4.00006-6
Hafizan, A. M., Klemeš, J. J., Alwi, S. R. W., Manan, Z. A., & Hamid, M. K. A.
(2019). Temperature disturbance management in a heat exchanger network for
maximum energy recovery considering economic analysis. Energies, 12(4).
https://doi.org/10.3390/EN12040594
How to Design Net Zero Carbon Buildings - One Click LCA. (n.d.). Retrieved
November 18, 2021, from https://www.oneclicklca.com/designing-net-zero-
carbon-buildings-article/
Ibrahim, N., Zainal, S. F. F. S., & Aziz, H. A. (2019). Application of UV-Based
Advanced Oxidation Processes in Water and Wastewater Treatment. Advances
in Environmental Engineering and Green Technologies, 384–414.
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5766-1.ch014
Isabel Segarra Trevino. (2019, May 14). EPA Must Protect Communities from
Hydrogen Cyanide Exposure | Earthjustice. https://earthjustice.org/from-the-
experts/2019-may/epa-must-protect-communities-from-hydrogen-cyanide-
exposure
Jaszczak, E., Polkowska, Ż., Narkowicz, S., & Namieśnik, J. (2017). Cyanides in the
environment—analysis—problems and challenges. Environmental Science
and Pollution Research International, 24(19), 15929.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11356-017-9081-7
Jers, C., Kalantari, A., Garg, A., & Mijakovic, I. (2019a). Production of 3-
Hydroxypropanoic Acid From Glycerol by Metabolically Engineered Bacteria.
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7.
https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2019.00124
Jers, C., Kalantari, A., Garg, A., & Mijakovic, I. (2019b). Production of 3-
Hydroxypropanoic Acid From Glycerol by Metabolically Engineered Bacteria.
316
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 7, 124.
https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2019.00124/BIBTEX
Jusakulvijit, P., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2021). Criteria prioritization for the
sustainable development of second-generation bioethanol in Thailand using the
Delphi-AHP technique. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11(1), 37.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S13705-021-00313-5
Kahane, A., & Squitieri, R. (1987). Electricity Use in Manufacturing. Annual Review
of Energy, 12(1), 223–251.
https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.EG.12.110187.001255
Karp, E. M., Eaton, T. R., SànchezNogué, V., Vorotnikov, V., Biddy, M. J., Tan, E.
C. D., Brandner, D. G., Cywar, R. M., Liu, R., Manker, L. P., Michener, W.
E., Gilhespy, M., Skoufa, Z., Watson, M. J., Fruchey, O. S., Vardon, D. R.,
Gill, R. T., Bratis, A. D., & Beckham, G. T. (2017). Renewable acrylonitrile
production. Science, 358(6368), 1307–1310.
https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAN1059
Kamel, D., Gadalla, M., & Ashour, F. (2020). New set of Graphical Axes for
Grassroots Design of Heat Exchanger Networks for Chemical Engineering
Applications. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 48, 637–642.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50107-5
Klemeš, J. J., & Kravanja, Z. (2013). Forty years of Heat Integration: Pinch Analysis
(PA) and Mathematical Programming (MP). Current Opinion in Chemical
Engineering, 2(4), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COCHE.2013.10.003
Kiang, Y. (2018). Combustion fundamentals and energy systems. Fuel Property
Estimation And Combustion Process Characterization, 313-362.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-813473-3.00009-x
Klein, N., Ramos, T. B., & Deutz, P. (2020). Circular economy practices and strategies
in public sector organizations: An integrative review. Sustainability
(Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12104181
Levels, N. R. C. (US) C. on A. E. G. (2008). Ammonia Acute Exposure Guideline
Levels. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207883/
317
Lim, K. S., Zhu, J. X., & Grace, J. R. (1995). Hydrodynamics of gas-solid fluidization.
International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 21, 141–193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(95)00038-Y
Liu, J., & Zhu, J. (2016). Reactor Performances and Hydrodynamics of Various Gas-
Solids Reactor Performances and Hydrodynamics of Various Gas-Solids
Fluidized Beds Fluidized Beds.
https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etdhttps://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3967
Licht, R. B., Vogt, D., & Bell, A. T. (2016a). The mechanism and kinetics of propene
ammoxidation over α-bismuth molybdate. Journal of Catalysis, 339, 228–241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCAT.2016.04.012
Licht, R. B., Vogt, D., & Bell, A. T. (2016b). The mechanism and kinetics of propene
ammoxidation over α-bismuth molybdate. Journal of Catalysis, 339, 228–241.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCAT.2016.04.012
Log, T., & Moi, A. L. (2018). Ethanol and Methanol Burn Risks in the Home
Environment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public
Health, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH15112379
Long, G., Meek, M. E., Canada, H., Ottawa, C., Cureton, P., & Canada, E. (2002).
World Health Organization Geneva.
Market Research Future. (2021, October 12). Ammonia Market worth USD 114.73
billion by 2028, registering a CAGR of 6.64% - Report by Market Research
Future (MRFR). GlobeNewswire News Room; Market Research Future.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-
release/2021/10/12/2312260/0/en/Ammonia-Market-worth-USD-114-73-
billion-by-2028-registering-a-CAGR-of-6-64-Report-by-Market-Research-
Future-MRFR.html
Monitoring by Control Technique - Wet Scrubber For Particulate Matter | US EPA.
(2016, May 25). US EPA. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-monitoring-
knowledge-base/monitoring-control-technique-wet-scrubber-particulate-0
Noble, R. D. and Terry, P. A. (2004) ‘Principles of Chemical Separations with
Environmental Applications’, Principles of Chemical Separations with Environmental
Applications. Cambridge University Press.
318
Propane process boost to acrylonitrile production | ICIS. (n.d.). Retrieved November
18, 2021, from
https://www.icis.com/explore/resources/news/1996/09/23/6005/propane-
process-boost-to-acrylonitrile-production/
Reducing chemical manufacturing carbon emissions | nibusinessinfo.co.uk. (n.d.).
Retrieved November 18, 2021, from
https://www.nibusinessinfo.co.uk/content/reducing-chemical-manufacturing-
carbon-emissions
Rikalovic, A., Cosic, I., & Lazarevic, D. (2014). GIS based multi-criteria analysis for
industrial site selection. Procedia Engineering, 69, 1054–1063.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.090
Reh, L. (1995). New and efficient high‐temperature processes with circulating fluid
bed reactors. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 18(2), 75–89.
https://doi.org/10.1002/CEAT.270180202
Ryu, J., & Maravelias, C. T. (2019). Simultaneous Process and Heat Exchanger
Network Synthesis Using a Discrete Temperature Grid. Industrial and
Engineering Chemistry Research, 58(15), 6002–6016.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.IECR.8B04083/SUPPL_FILE/IE8B04083_SI_0
01.PDF
Sinnott, R., & Towler, G. (2019). Chemical Engineering Design. In Chemical
Engineering Design: SI Edition. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102599-
4.09980-X
Sinnott, R., & Towler, G. (2019). Chemical Engineering Design : SI Edition. Chemical
Engineering Design, 6, 1359.
Sinnott, R., & Towler, G. (2020). General Site Considerations. Chemical Engineering
Design, 1017–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-102599-4.00014-x
Soloveichik, G. (2017). FUTURE OF AMMONIA PRODUCTION: IMPROVEMENT
OF HABER-BOSCH PROCESS OR ELECTROCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS?
Towler, G., & Sinnott, R. K. (2013). Chemical Engineering Design - Principles,
Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design (2nd Edition). In Elsevier.
319
Valera-Medina, A., Xiao, H., Owen-Jones, M., David, W. I. F., & Bowen, P. J. (2018).
Ammonia for power. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 69, 63–102.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PECS.2018.07.001
Venkat, P., & Jim, R. (2016, September). Introduction to Ammonia Production |
AIChE.
https://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep/2016/september/introductio
n-ammonia-production
Wang, C., Zhu, J., Barghi, S., & Li, C. (2014). Axial and radial development of solids
holdup in a high flux/density gas-solids circulating fluidized bed. Chemical
Engineering Science, 108, 233–243.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CES.2013.12.042
What is net zero and how can we get there? - Energy Saving Trust. (2021, October
20). https://energysavingtrust.org.uk/what-is-net-zero-and-how-can-we-get-
there/
Wright, C. Y., Godfrey, L., Armiento, G., Haywood, L. K., Inglesi-Lotz, R., Lyne, K.,
& Schwerdtle, P. N. (2019). Circular economy and environmental health in
low- And middle-income countries. Globalization and Health, 15(1), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1186/S12992-019-0501-Y/FIGURES/1
Yaws, C. L. (2003). Yaws’ Handbook of Thermodynamic and Physical Properties of
Chemical Compounds. Knovel.
Yong, J. Y., Varbanov, P. S., & Klemeš, J. J. (2015). Matrix representation of the grid
diagram for heat exchanger networks. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
TRANSACTIONS, 45, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1545018
320
APPENDIX II
1) Pump
PUMP (P-101)
To begin the calculation, the size factor is calculated using the following equation:
𝑆 = 𝑄(𝐻)0.5
𝑆 = 35.73 (196.25)0.5
𝑆 = 500.55
The base purchase cost is then computed using formula depicted below.
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝{12.1656 − 1.1448[ln(𝑆)] + 0.0862 𝑙𝑛[(𝑆)2 ]}
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑒𝑥𝑝{12.1656 − 1.1448[ln(500.55)] + 0.0862 𝑙𝑛[(500.55)2 ]}
𝐶𝐵 = $ 455.52 × 𝑅𝑀 4.40
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑅𝑀 2004.29
Then, the f.o.b purchase cost is given by the following equation.
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑇 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = 1 × 2 × 𝑅𝑀 2004.29
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 4008.58
Next, the bare module cost is given by the following equation.
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 3.3 × 𝑅𝑀 4008.58
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝑅𝑀 13,228.30
PUMP (P-102)
To begin the calculation, the size factor is calculated using the following
equation:
𝑆 = 𝑄(𝐻)0.5
321
𝑆 = 83.37(144.98)0.5
𝑆 = 1003.89
The base purchase cost is then computed using formula depicted below.
𝐶𝐵 = $ 231.533 × 𝑅𝑀 4.40
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑅𝑀 1018.74
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑇 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = 1 × 2 × 𝑅𝑀 1018.74
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 2037.49
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝑅𝑀 6723.71
322
2) Heat exchanger
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 35.05°𝐶
Then, the surface area of the heat exchanger A is a cross sectional area of shell
tube using the equation below,
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
3,276,650
𝐴=
1500 × 35.05
𝐴 = 62.33 𝑚2
To calculate the material factor, FM, the following formula will be utilised:
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
323
62.33 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.7
On the other hand, to calculate the pressure factor for our heat exchanger, the
following formula will be used.
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.0151 58.0151 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.99
Next, the cost of purchase, the bare cost should also be calculated and it can be
done by using the following formula;
𝐶𝐵 = $ 16,638.06 × 𝑅𝑀 4.40
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑅𝑀 73,207.47
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
324
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 143,680.90
All in all, the bare-module cost for this heater is calculated as follows:
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝑅𝑀 455,468.30
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 49.46 °𝐶
Then, the surface area of the heat exchanger A is a cross sectional area of shell
tube using the equation below,
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
325
1,654,860
𝐴=
1500 × 49.46
𝐴 = 22.30 𝑚2
To calculate the material factor, FM, the following formula will be utilised:
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
22.30 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.57
On the other hand, to calculate the pressure factor for our heat exchanger, the
following formula will be used.
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.0151 58.0151 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.99
Next, the cost of purchase, the bare cost should also be calculated and it can be
done by using the following formula;
326
𝐶𝐵 = $ 12,799.97 × 𝑅𝑀 4.40
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑅𝑀 56,319.87
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 171,552.18
All in all, the bare-module cost for this heater is calculated as follows:
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
327
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 70.35 °𝐶
Then, the surface area of the heat exchanger A is a cross sectional area of shell
tube using the equation below,
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
1,654,860
𝐴=
1500 × 70.35
𝐴 = 15.68 𝑚2
To calculate the material factor, FM, the following formula will be utilised:
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
15.68 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.57
On the other hand, to calculate the pressure factor for our heat exchanger, the
following formula will be used.
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.0151 58.0151 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.99
328
Next, the cost of purchase, the bare cost should also be calculated and it can be
done by using the following formula;
𝐶𝐵 = 𝑅𝑀 53, 986.87
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 191, 285.83
All in all, the bare-module cost for this heater is calculated as follows:
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
3) Reactor
329
𝑉 =𝑄×𝑡
Where;
The volumetric flowrate is calculate using the formula below (Fogler, 2013):
𝐹𝐴 𝑅𝑇
𝑣=
𝑦𝐴 𝑃
Where;
𝑇 : temperature (K)
𝑦𝐴 : mole fraction of A
330
(492.1351)(8.314)(583.15)
𝑣=
(1)(10 × 10)
𝑣 = 23,860.23 𝑚3 /ℎ𝑟
𝑉 = 23,860.23 × 0.0317
𝑉 = 755.35 𝑚3
For the fluidized bed reactor, the calculations for the pressure are as follows:
= 1.1 × 4 𝑏𝑎𝑟
= 4.4 𝑏𝑎𝑟
= 0.44 𝑁/𝑚𝑚2
= 590 + 50
331
= 640℉
= 337.78℃
Equation below can be used to compute the inside diameter using the stated
ratio.
1⁄3
4𝑉
Internal Diameter, 𝐷𝑖 = [ ]
𝜋 × 𝐿𝐷 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜
1⁄3
4(755.35𝑚3
𝐷𝑖 = [ ]
𝜋×3
𝐷𝑖 = 6.848 𝑚
Height, 𝐿 = 3 × 𝐷𝑖
𝐿 = 3 × 6.848
𝐿 = 20.532 𝑚
Where;
332
𝐶𝑤 : a factor account for the weight of nozzles, manways, internal supports,
etc; which can be taken as 1.15
𝑡 : wall thickness, mm
Taking:
𝑡 = 23 𝑚𝑚
𝜌𝑚 = 7840 𝑘𝑔/𝑚3
𝐻𝑣 = 20.532 𝑚
𝑊𝑣 = 1,142,173.87 𝑁
𝑊𝑣 = 1,142.17 𝑘𝑁
333
Therefore, total weights of the shell (excluding internal fitting) are 1,142.17
kN.
For the weight of insulation material, the selected material is stated as below.
Weight of insulation, 𝑊𝑖
= 22.07 𝑚3
Weight of insulation, 𝑊𝑖 = 𝜌𝑖 𝑉𝑖 𝑔
= 28,149.93 𝑁
The weight of insulation is doubled to allow for the fittings. Hence, the actual
weight of the insulation = 28,149.93 × 2 = 56,299.86 𝑁 = 56.30 𝑘𝑁
334
= 581,617.66 × 0.1 × 9.81
= 570566.92
= 570.57 𝑁
𝑊𝑧 = 1769.04 kN
To calculate freight (free) on board purchase cost, CV of the empty vessel, the
size factor (Weight, W) needs to be determined using equation below.
Where;
𝑡𝑠 : wall thickness, m
𝑊 = 21,905.22 𝑁
335
𝑊 = 2232.95 𝑘𝑔
𝑊 = 4922.80 𝑙𝑏
Hence, the F.O.B of the purchase cost can be calculated using the equation
below
Where;
𝐶𝑉 = $31,294.36
CPL is the additional cost for platforms and ladders is calculated using the
equation below;
Where;
𝐶𝑃𝐿 = $14,393.86
336
The total purchase cost, CP is calculated using the equation as follow:
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝑉 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿
𝐶𝑃 = (1.0)(31,294.36) + 14,393.86
𝐶𝑃 = $45,688.22
The total bare module factor, CBM is therefore determined using the following
equation.
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 × 𝐶𝑃
4) Heater (H-103&H-104)
Heater (H 103)
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
337
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 10.124
Then, the surface area of the shell and tube heater is calculated as follows:
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
96400
𝐴=
1500 × 10.124
𝐴 = 68.3255𝑚2
Next, in calculating the base cost, 𝐶𝐵 for this heater, value of A calculated
above is inserted
= $12302.49 × 𝑅𝑀4.4
= 𝑅𝑀54130.95
338
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.0151 58.0151 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9913
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
68.325 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.701
After that, the cost of purchase for this heater is calculated as follows
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 283052.90
All in all, the bare-module cost for this heater is calculated as follows:
6𝐶𝑃 = 𝐶𝑃 × 𝐹𝐵𝑀
𝐶𝑃 = 283052.90 × 3.17
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 897277.80
339
Calculation of Heater (H 103)
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 10.124
Then, the surface area of the shell and tube heater is calculated as follows:
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
96400
𝐴=
1500 × 10.124
𝐴 = 68.3255𝑚2
Next, in calculating the base cost, 𝐶𝐵 for this heater, value of A calculated
above is inserted into the following equation.
340
= $12302.49 × 𝑅𝑀4.4
= 𝑅𝑀54130.95
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.0151 58.0151 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9913
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
68.325 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.701
After that, the cost of purchase for this heater is calculated as follows
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
341
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 283052.90
All in all, the bare-module cost for this heater is calculated as follows:
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐶𝑃 × 𝐹𝐵𝑀
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝑅𝑀 897277.80
Heater (H 104)
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 5.7625
Then, the surface area of the shell and tube heater is calculated as follows:
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
72000
𝐴=
1500 × 5.7625
342
𝐴 = 89.6592𝑚2
Next, in calculating the base cost, 𝐶𝐵 for this heater, value of A calculated
above is inserted into the following equation.
= $12087.49 × 𝑅𝑀4.4
= 𝑅𝑀53184.94
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.015 58.0151 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9913
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
89.6591 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
343
𝐹𝑀 = 2.7359
After that, the cost of purchase for this heater is calculated as follows
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = 𝑅𝑀 247373.80
All in all, the bare-module cost for this heater is calculated as follows:
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐶𝑃 × 𝐹𝐵𝑀
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝑅𝑀 784174.90
M
Vapor volumetric flowrate, Vv = 3600 v× ρ
v
344
3826.338kg/hr
Vv =
3600 × 201.940kg/m3
Vv = 0.026m3 /s
• Column Diameter, Dv
4𝑉𝑣
𝐷𝑣 = √
π × 𝑢𝑡
𝑚3
4(0.263 𝑠 )
𝐷𝑣 = √ 𝑚
3600 × (0.15 × 0.079 𝑠 )
𝐷𝑣 = 1.673 m
Therefore, the minimum internal diameter of the flash separator vessel is 1.673m.
Therefore, the value of internal diameter, Dv 1.673m is used instead for the next
calculation.
M
Liquid Volumetric Flowrate, Vl = 3600 l× ρ
l
345
𝑘𝑔
16173.3
𝑉𝑙 = ℎ𝑟
𝑘𝑔
3600 × 464.936
𝑚3
𝑚3
𝑉𝑙 = 0.048
𝑠
𝑚3 𝑠
𝑉ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑑 = 0.048 × 10 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒 × 60
𝑠 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑉ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑑 = 29.007 𝑚3
D2v
Vessel cross − sectional area, A = π ( )
4
1.6732
A = π( )
4
A = 6.245 m2
• Liquid Depth, hL
29.006m3
hL =
1.200m2
346
hL = 13.301m
• Column Height, Hv
Dv
Hv = hL + + Dv + 0.3m
2
1.673 m
𝐻𝑣 = 13.200𝑚 + + 1.673 m + 0.3𝑚
2
𝐻𝑣 = 5.769𝑚
• Design pressure, Pd
𝑃𝑖 = 𝑃 × 1.1
𝑃𝑖 = 3.040 × 1.1
𝑁
𝑃𝑖 = 3.344𝑏𝑎𝑟 @0.334
𝑚𝑚2
• Purchase cost, Cp
Cp = FM Cv + CPL
Material factor, FM for carbon steel material is equal to 1.0.
2}
𝐶𝑣 = 𝑒 {10.5449−0.4672[𝑙𝑛(10529.07)]+0.05482[𝑙𝑛(10529.072)]
𝐶𝑣 = 49030.011$
347
The additional cost CPL for platforms and ladders is computed using the
following formula, which takes into account the vessel's interior diameter, Di (ft), and
the tangent-to-tangent length of the shell, L (ft) for vertical vessels.).
𝐶𝑃𝐿 = 7853.46$
Therefore, inserting all the information into the purchase cost, Cp formula;
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐶𝑉 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿
𝐶𝑃 = 1 × 49030 + 7853.463
𝐶𝑃 = 71209.10$
CBM = Cp × FBM
FBM = 4.16
348
Mv
Vapor volumetric flowrate, Vv =
3600 × ρv
925.96 kg/hr
Vv =
3600 × 0.73kg/m3
• Column Diameter, Dv
4V
Dv = √ πuv
t
4 × (9.7667×10−5 )
Dv = √ π×0.0993
Dv = 0.0354 m
M
Liquid Volumetric Flowrate, Vl = 3600 l× ρ
l
349
8386.99 kg/hr
Vl =
3600 × 797.42kg/m3
s
Vheld = Vl × (10 min× 60 )
min
10−7 m3 s
Vheld = (8.1155 × ) × (10 min × 60 min)
s
Vheld = 0.00049m3
D2v
Vessel cross − sectional area, A = π ( )
4
0.03542
A = π( )
4
A = 9.8423 × 10−4 m2
• Liquid Depth, hL
0.00049m3
hL =
9.8423 × 10−4 m2
hL = 0.4951m
350
• Column Height, Hv
Dv
Hv = hL + + Dv + 0.3m
2
0.0354m
Hv = 0.4951m + + 0.0354m + 0.3m
2
Hv = 0.8481m
• Design pressure, Pd
2
Pd = e[0.60608+0.91615(lnPo )+0.0015655(lnPo) ]
Pd = Po × 1.1
Since the pressure used in this process is only 1 bar or equivalent to 14.5 psig,
the calculation to obtain the design pressure will be;
2]
Pd = e[0.60608+0.91615(ln 14.5)+0.0015655(ln 14.5)
Pd = 0.1482N/mm2
• Purchase cost, Cp
Cp = FM Cv + CPL
351
• Cost Of Empty Vessel, Cv
2]
Cv = e[7.1390+0.18255(ln W)+0.02297(ln W)
Since the total weight of the vessel is 3.0156kN or equivalent with 677.97 lb,
thus;
2]
Cv = e[7.1390+0.18255(ln 677.97)+0.02297(ln 677.97)
Cv = 10995.67$
Where Di is internal diameter of vessel in ft and L is the height of vessel in ft. Since
the internal diameter of the vessel is equal to 0.508m or equivalent to 0.1548ft and the
height of the vessel is 0.8481m or equivalent to 0.2585ft, thus;
CPL = 39.66$
Therefore, inserting all the information into the purchase cost, Cp formula;
Cp = (1 × 10995.67$) + 39.66$
Cp =11035.33$
352
CBM = Cp × FBM
FBM = 4.16
6) Cooler
Cooler (E-106)
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = $56306.022 = 𝑅𝑀 260946.50
The FBM value is constant which is 3.17. Thus, the cost of purchase, CBM
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
353
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 3.17 × 56306.022
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
7.45 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.46
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
58.015 58.015 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.99
𝐶𝐵 = $24284.74 = 𝑅𝑀 106852.80
354
The surface area of the cooler, A
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
18616630
𝐴=
1500 × 162.51
𝐴 = 7.45 𝑓𝑡 2
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 162.51
Cooler (E-107)
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
𝐶𝑃 = $36021.95 = 𝑅𝑀 158496.60
355
The FBM value is constant which is 3.17. Thus, the cost of purchase, CBM
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
30.52 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.61
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
43.511 43.511 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9885
356
𝐶𝐵 = exp[ 11.551 − 0.9186[ln(30.52)] + 0.09790 [ln(30.52)]2 ]
𝐶𝐵 = $13978.63 = 𝑅𝑀 61506.00
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
229130
𝐴=
1500 × 5.01
𝐴 = 30.52 𝑓𝑡 2
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 5.01
Cooler (E-108)
𝐶𝑃 = 𝐹𝑀 𝐹𝐿 𝐹𝑃 𝐶𝐵
357
𝐶𝑃 = 2.83 × 1 × 0.9829 × 12111.44
𝐶𝑃 = $33741.73 = 𝑅𝑀 148463.60
The FBM value is constant which is 3.17. Thus, the cost of purchase, CBM
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐹𝐵𝑀 𝐶𝑃
𝐴 𝑏
𝐹𝑀 = 𝑎 + ( )
100
186.34 0.13
𝐹𝑀 = 1.75 + ( )
100
𝐹𝑀 = 2.83
𝑃 𝑃 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
14.504 14.504 2
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9803 + 0.0018 + 0.0017( )
100 100
𝐹𝑃 = 0.9829
358
The bare cost, CB
𝐶𝐵 = $12111.44 = 𝑅𝑀 53290.32
𝑄
𝐴=
𝑈 × ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
1396130
𝐴=
1500 × 4.99
𝐴 = 186.34 𝑓𝑡 2
(𝑇1 − 𝑡2 ) − (𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
(𝑇 − 𝑡2 )
ln 1
(𝑇2 − 𝑡1 )
Δ𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 4.99
7) Distillation column
359
Distillation Column (C-101)
Operating temperature, To = 77 F
Po = 29.01 psig
Assumptions made:
Internal diameter, Di
Cost of installation, CT
360
𝐶𝑇 = 46 × 1 × 1 × 1 × $782.68
𝐶𝑣 = $60264.05 × 4.24
𝐶𝑣 = 𝑅𝑀 255,519.59
𝐶𝑃𝐿 = 𝑅𝑀 104,345.75
Purchase Cost, CP
𝐼2021
𝐶𝑝 = (𝐹𝑚 𝐶𝑣 + 𝐶𝑃𝐿 ) ( )
𝐼𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒,2013
708
𝐶𝑝 = ((1 × 60,264.05) + 24,609.85) × ( )
567
𝐶𝑝 = $105,980.11 × 4.24
𝐶𝑝 = 𝑅𝑀 449,355.66
361
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝐶𝑇 𝐶𝑃 × 𝐹𝐵𝑀
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 𝑅𝑀 2,060,152.34
8) Absorption column
For vertical vessels, the 𝐶𝑉 is calculated using equation below when the weight is
𝐶𝑉 = 21,257 $
After that, the added cost, 𝐶𝑃𝐿 for platforms and ladders depends on the inside
diameter and the length of the column, in feet is given by;
𝐶𝑃𝐿 = 15,577 $
As the material of construction used is the low-alloy steel, hence the 𝐹𝑀 = 1.2.
𝐶𝑃 = (1.2)(21,257 $) + 15,577 $
𝐶𝑃 = 41,084 $
362
Thus, the total purchase cost is 41,084 $. After that, the bare-module cost needs
to be calculated. The bare-module cost, 𝐶𝐵𝑀 or installed cost is calculated using the
bare-module factor, 𝐹𝐵𝑀 and the equipment's free-on-board (f.o.b., excluding delivery
costs). The bare-module factor, 𝐹𝐵𝑀 can be obtain from Appendix II.
From the Appendix II, the 𝐹𝐵𝑀 for this vertical pressure vessel is 4.16.
To calculate the 𝐶𝐵𝑀 , the equation below is used;
𝐶𝐵𝑀 = 170,912 $
363
APPENDIX III
364
365
B. Material of Construction Factors, FM for Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
AMMONIA
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
ETHYL ACRYLATE
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
ETHANOL
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
TITANIUM DIOXIDE
415
416
417
418
419
420