Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

PERFORMANCE TASK NO.

1: Writing of Introduction
Group No. 3
Group De Mesa, Jashel Joy Salvacion Francisco
Members: Dela Cruz, Cianna Mae San Pedro
Garnica, Jhonabelle Silva
Mabuti, Achilles Caliste
Marcellana, Leana Julia Lacson
Yumul, Samantha Jaunie Corapan
Roles Names
Leader: Garnica, Jhonabelle Silva
Writer:
Spokesperson:
Timer:
Researcher 1:
Researcher 2:
Researcher 3:

General Instructions:
1. ALL members will answer this file by highlighting the corresponding points in each area.
2. ALL members will submit to the GROUP LEADER the accomplished word file.
3. The GROUP LEADER will make an average score for each member to be to be submitted to
the subject teacher.
4. The GROUP LEADER will compile the accomplished files and submit it also in PDF cop

FOR EACH GROUP MEMBER


Group Member 1 – NAME: ___ Garnica, Jhonabelle Silva
____________________________________________________

CRITERIA 10 8 6 4
Participation Actively helped the Actively helped the Passively helped the The attendance with
group by regularly group by regularly group through group meetings is
attending break out attending breakout limited attendance poor to none, did
room meetings, room meetings, to meetings, not offer any helpful
offering helpful offering helpful seldomly offering suggestion nor
suggestions, and suggestions. suggestions, and feedback, and did
actively working on reluctantly working not work on the
the assigned role. on assigned role. assigned role
diligently.
Quality of The contribution The contribution The contribution The contribution
Contribution made to the group made to the group made to the group made to the group
was of great quality was of great quality was of good quality was of poor quality,
and had a great and had a great and had some and had little impact
impact to the final impact to the final impact on the final to the final output.
output. output. output.
Group Member 2 – NAME: ______ Dela Cruz, Cianna Mae San Pedro

____________________________________________________
CRITERIA 10 8 6 4
Participation Actively helped the Actively helped the Passively helped the The attendance with
group by regularly group by regularly group through group meetings is
attending break out attending breakout limited attendance poor to none, did
room meetings, room meetings, to meetings, not offer any helpful
offering helpful offering helpful seldomly offering suggestion nor
suggestions, and suggestions. suggestions, and feedback, and did
actively working on reluctantly working not work on the
the assigned role. on assigned role. assigned role
diligently.
Quality of The contribution The contribution The contribution The contribution
Contribution made to the group made to the group made to the group made to the group
was of great quality was of great quality was of good quality was of poor quality,
and had a great and had a great and had some and had little impact
impact to the final impact to the final impact on the final to the final output.
output. output. output.

Group Member 3 – NAME: ______ De Mesa, Jashel Joy Salvacion Francisco

____________________________________________________
CRITERIA 10 8 6 4
Participation Actively helped the Actively helped the Passively helped the The attendance with
group by regularly group by regularly group through group meetings is
attending break out attending breakout limited attendance poor to none, did
room meetings, room meetings, to meetings, not offer any helpful
offering helpful offering helpful seldomly offering suggestion nor
suggestions, and suggestions. suggestions, and feedback, and did
actively working on reluctantly working not work on the
the assigned role. on assigned role. assigned role
diligently.
Quality of The contribution The contribution The contribution The contribution
Contribution made to the group made to the group made to the group made to the group
was of great quality was of great quality was of good quality was of poor quality
and had a great and had a great and had some and had little impact
impact to the final impact to the final impact on the final to the final output.
output. output. output.
Group Member 4 – NAME: _________ Yumul, Samantha Jaunie Corapan
_________________________________________________
CRITERIA 10 8 6 4
Participation Actively helped the Actively helped the Passively helped the The attendance with
group by regularly group by regularly group through group meetings is
attending break out attending breakout limited attendance poor to none, did
room meetings, room meetings, to meetings, not offer any helpful
offering helpful offering helpful seldomly offering suggestion nor
suggestions, and suggestions. suggestions, and feedback, and did
actively working on reluctantly working not work on the
the assigned role. on assigned role. assigned role
diligently.
Quality of The contribution The contribution The contribution The contribution
Contribution made to the group made to the group made to the group made to the group
was of great quality was of great quality was of good quality was of poor quality
and had a great and had a great and had some and had little impact
impact to the final impact to the final impact on the final to the final output.
output. output. output.

Group Member 5 – NAME: __________ Marcellana, Leana Julia Lacson

________________________________________________
CRITERIA 10 8 6 4
Participation Actively helped the Actively helped the Passively helped the The attendance with
group by regularly group by regularly group through group meetings is
attending break out attending breakout limited attendance poor to none, did
room meetings, room meetings, to meetings, not offer any helpful
offering helpful offering helpful seldomly offering suggestion nor
suggestions, and suggestions. suggestions, and feedback, and did
actively working on reluctantly working not work on the
the assigned role. on assigned role. assigned role
diligently.
Quality of The contribution The contribution The contribution The contribution
Contribution made to the group made to the group made to the group made to the group
was of great quality was of great quality was of good quality was of poor quality
and had a great and had a great and had some and had little impact
impact to the final impact to the final impact on the final to the final output.
output. output. output.
FOR GROUP LEADER
SUMMARY OF SCORESHEET
NAME OF
SCORES FROM OTHER MEMBERS AVERAGE
SCORER
1. DE MESA
2. DELA CRUZ
3. GARNICA
4. MABUTI
5. MARCELLANA
6. YUMUL

Pls. round off the average scores – NO DECIMALS.

You might also like