Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sample Proposal - 2023
Sample Proposal - 2023
Sample Proposal - 2023
xxxxxxx
Co-supervisor: xxxxxxxx
Date: xxxxxxxx
Table of Contents
Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................1
1. Introduction........................................................................................................................2
1.1. Study background........................................................................................................2
1.2. Problem statement.......................................................................................................3
1.3. General research objective..........................................................................................4
1.4. Specific objectives.......................................................................................................4
2. Literature review................................................................................................................5
2.1. Water pollution............................................................................................................5
2.2. Wastewater treatment technologies.............................................................................5
2.2.1. Anaerobic digestion.............................................................................................6
2.2.2. Ozonation.............................................................................................................6
2.2.3. Photodegradation..................................................................................................7
2.3. Integrated anaerobic digestion and advanced oxidation processes.............................8
3. Methodology......................................................................................................................9
3.1. Equipment and materials.............................................................................................9
3.2. Experimental procedure...............................................................................................9
3.2.1. Ozonation.............................................................................................................9
3.2.2. Anaerobic digestion...........................................................................................10
3.2.3. Catalyst preparation and photodegradation........................................................10
3.3. Catalyst characterization and chemical analyses, and determination of reaction
mechanisms..........................................................................................................................10
3.4. Toxicity analyses.......................................................................................................11
3.5. Experimental design, statistical, data and error analyses..........................................11
3.6. Work plan..................................................................................................................12
3.7. Budget........................................................................................................................12
References................................................................................................................................13
1
1. Introduction
1.1. Study background
Pollution by industrial activities, is one of the major threats to air and water quality.
Continued industrialisation in the recent past has deteriorated various ecological systems on
which human life is dependent. Many industrial processes generate large amount of wastes,
of which approximately 90% comprise wastewaters. The industrial processes generate
pollutants such as dyes, solvents, heavy metals and endocrine disrupting compounds. These
pollutants enter aquatic systems through direct dumping, as industrial discharge or from
dysfunctional wastewater treatment facilities. On direct discharge, the industrial wastewaters
contain high levels of organic and inorganic pollutants and may as high as 10 000 mg/L as
observed in Ji et al. (2016). Industrial wastewater can affect receiving water systems in
several ways including altering the pH, increasing the number of nutrients leading to
eutrophication, altering the colour or increasing turbidity. Highly turbid and coloured water
can affect the aquatic flora and fauna by blocking sunlight penetration thus hindering
photosynthesis, or by providing suspended solid particles that can host and transport disease
causing bacteria and viruses. The increasing environmental hazardous effects associated with
the discharge of the recalcitrant compounds contained in industrial effluents, has led to more
stringent discharge standards set by governments and regulating bodies, thus calling for
appropriate treatment methods (Mantzavinos et al., 1999; Oller et al., 2011).
Anaerobic digestion (AD), is a treatment method can be used to reduce the high organic load
of industrial wastes and sludge, and in the process achieve waste utilisation through biogas
recovery (Roy et al., 2016). Moreover, to mitigate against climate change, brought about by
the over reliance on fossil fuels, anaerobic treatment has found new application as a source of
renewable energy in the form of the recovered valuable biogas. Most of the modern
municipal facilities for wastewater treatment are meant for domestic wastewater remediation.
The industrial wastewaters due to their contents, should be pre-treated before discharge to
municipal collection systems. If not, a disruption may occur at the receiving municipal
wastewater treatment plants due to the presence of toxic organic and inorganic compounds in
the industrial effluents (Shivaraju, 2011). Moreover, the problem of sludge disposal from the
municipal wastewater treatment (WWT) plants is escalating given the rising and high costs
for sludge storage, dewatering, transport and landfilling. The AD treatment presents a
feasible sludge disposal route with ability to reduce the final sludge solids for disposal, and
achieve biogas production in the process. AD is nowadays considered an integral part of
2
modern wastewater treatment as it can reduce the disposal cost and environmental footprint
of the treatment plants (Strong et al., 2011). Anaerobic treatment alone, however, is not
sufficient in meeting the stringent discharge requirements for total suspended solid (TSS) and
chemical oxygen demand (COD) thus calling for its integration with other treatment methods
(Kim et al., 2010).
To enhance the anaerobic digestion of industrial wastewater and municipal waste such as
waste activated sludge (WAS), the integration of AD with other treatment technologies is
required (Oller et al., 2011). Pre-treatment methods have been developed to accelerate the
rate of digestion and enhance biogas production during AD. The pre-treatment can improve
the biodegradability of WAS by rupturing cell walls and making the intracellular substances
available for microorganisms. Also, the biorecalcitrant and toxic organic compounds found in
industrial wastewater, can be converted into easily biodegradable organic compounds through
pre-treatment (Zhen et al., 2017). Of the pre-treatment techniques, currently being employed,
ozonation which is an advanced oxidation process (AOP), is very effective in yielding a
higher degree of organic solids disintegration and improved substrate biodegradability. It also
improves sludge settling properties as well as reducing scum formation and bulking (Chu et
al., 2009). Another route for improving the AD treatment is by integrating it with a post-
treatment AOP such as photodegradation. Photodegradation can achieve complete
mineralization of recalcitrant organic pollutants that are likely to remain after AD. Moreover,
since the pre-treatment is usually intended to lead to partial mineralization, some non-
biodegradable compounds will escape into the subsequent AD and finally to the AD effluent
thus necessitating the need for a post-treatment (Oller et al., 2011).
3
during ozonolysis, is important for achieving effective and optimised pre-treatment.
Moreover, ozonolysis pre-treatment in some instances does not lead to complete reduction of
the biorecalcitrants into biodegradable compounds. The unreduced biorecalcitrant compounds
escape into the AD process and later into the AD effluent. The AD effluent despite having
reduced light inhibition, therefore still contains the unreduced biorecalcitrants. Photocatalysis
can be introduced as a post-treatment to AD to remove the remaining biorecalcitrants. Since
the threshold will be low in concentration, energy requirement for the photocatalytic process
will be low as well.
iii. To support commercial titanium dioxide (TiO 2) please check this ? onto zeolite and
characterise the resultant TiO2/Zeolite photocatalyst
vi. To determine the toxicity effect of products formed at each stage of the integrated
treatment system
4
2. Literature review
2.1. Water pollution
Among the natural resources, water is the most important, and is critical for food production,
economic activities, and survival of all living things including humans. Water quality
(including surface and groundwater) and availability influences the environment,
development and economic growth. Human activities, increased urbanisation,
industrialisation, population increase and climate change have all created a decline in water
quality. Industrial processes such as alcohol distillation, leather tanning and textiles generate
copious amount of wastewater (Halder and Islam, 2015). Such industries use large volumes
of water in the production processes, where the water meets toxic chemicals, heavy metals,
organic sludge and even radioactive wastes. The pollutants are then dumped into receiving
streams leading to massive pollution of rivers, lakes and other aquatic systems. Also,
increased population and urbanisation, and expanded sewer coverage has led to the
generation of large amounts of municipal wastewater, which is conveyed as sewage for
treatment at municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTP). The conventional municipal
WWTP are not effective in removing emerging persistent recalcitrant pollutants such as
pharmaceuticals, detergents and endocrine disrupting substances. These pollutants when
discharged in the treated effluent into water systems can bioaccumulate in organisms and
adversely affect endocrine systems (Bechambi et al., 2015; Shivaraju, 2011).
5
Anaerobic digestion is widely applied as a first step treatment technique for several industrial
wastewaters such as distillery wastewater (DWW), and forms an integral part in most modern
municipal wastewater (MWW) treatment plants (Van Zyl et al., 2008; Apollo and Aoyi, 2016).
Hydrolysis of polymers such as cellulose, which are not easily decomposed, is the step that
limits the rate of anaerobic digestion. The waste activated sludge (WAS) generated from most
MWW treatment plants consist of heterotrophic bacteria not easily biodegradable, complex
floc structure, hard cell wall and large organic molecules which cannot be absorbed by
microorganisms. The hard cell wall consisting of microbial cells inside extracellular
polymers, is a physical barrier that does not allow intracellular organic compounds to be
biodegraded easily. A large amount of energy is therefore required for the rupturing of the
bacterial cell envelope (Bougrier et al., 2006). The hydrolysis step is also limited by the
presence of melanoidins mostly found in DWW and other high molecular weight (HMW)
biorecalcitrant organic compounds such as pharmaceuticals, phenolic acids and polyphenols
(Chaiprapat and Laklam, 2011). To improve the AD process, implementation of pre-
treatment methods that would enhance the hydrolysis step is necessary.
2.2.2. Ozonation
Ozonation, which is a chemical pre-treatment and considered most effective for sludge
disintegration, does not lead to an increase in salt concentration and has no chemical residues
as compared to other pre-treatment methods (Chu et al., 2009). Through ozonation,
biorecalcitrant polymeric HMW organic compounds can be broken down into easily
6
biodegradable low molecular weight (LMW) compounds (Santos et al., 2013). Moreover, it
disinfects pathogens; hence has gained great interest for AD pre-treatment (Ariunbaatar et al.,
2014). Whereas ozonation has been shown to improve wastewater biodegradability, its
effectiveness and mechanisms should be further explored especially for the production of
high quality biomass substrates (Kim et al., 2014). Processes including (i) sludge
solubilisation mechanisms (ii) reduction of organic compounds from HMW to LMW, and
(iii) biodegradability and toxicity analyses, during ozonation and their effect on the ensuing
AD should be explored, for an in-depth understanding of this pre-treatment process.
The main role of ozonation pre-treatment should be to partially oxidise the biorecalcitrant
part and release biodegradable intermediates (Oller et al., 2011). In order to achieve this, the
ozonation dose and time have to be limited (Chaiprapat and Laklam, 2011). Moreover, ozone
is highly selective leading to partial or non-oxidation of the biorecalcitrant organic
constituents of interest (Achisa et al., 2016). The time limitation and high selectivity can in
some instances allow the biorecalcitrant compounds not fully ozonised to escape into the
subsequent AD process and later into the AD effluent. In such instances, a further robust
post-treatment method would be needed for the AD effluent to ensure complete removal of
the remaining micropollutants. Apart from biodegradation, photodegradation presents another
route for destroying biorecalcitrant and toxic organic compounds in water (Oller et al., 2011).
2.2.3. Photodegradation
Photocatalytic degradation using ultraviolet light and the widely used titanium dioxide (TiO 2)
catalyst, is capable of removing the recalcitrant organic compounds (Otieno et al., 2016). For
effective photocatalysis however, there is a need for the development of photocatalysts with
high quantum efficiency and improved substrate adsorption capability. This can be achieved
through coupling of TiO2 with other semiconductors such as zinc oxide (ZnO), and
introduction of adsorbents materials such as activated carbon (AC) and zeolite, as support for
the catalyst (Otieno et al., 2017). Moreover, there are drawbacks in using photocatalysts in a
powdered form, such as aggregation of the powder especially at high concentrations and the
costly post-treatment separation of the nanopowder from wastewater after treatment (Asiltürk
& Şener 2012). Supporting TiO2 onto the low-cost zeolite support, for enhanced adsorption of
substrate and ease of separation after treatment, presents a feasible route for improving the
photocatalytic process (Durgakumari et al., 2002). Pre-concentration of organic compounds
on the catalyst surface by the zeolite adsorbent support can lead to reduction in energy
7
requirements since TiO2 quantum yields increase linearly with concentration (Haque et al.,
2005).
8
3. Methodology
3.1. Equipment and materials
Equipment that will be used in this study include: a bioreactor, ozone generator, a
photoreactor, ozonation reactor, centrifugal pump and air compressor. All the reactors will be
designed and constructed, while the ozone generator will be bought. The photoreactor will
consist of a 25 UVC lamp of 254 nm wavelength. The wastewaters to be treated, distillery
wastewater and municipal wastewater, will be sourced from local distilleries and municipal
wastewater treatment works, respectively. Prepared phenolic wastewater of known
composition and characteristics will be first used to optimise the treatment processes and
determine the reaction intermediates and mechanisms involved in the ozonation and
photocatalytic processes. Potassium iodide (KI) and sodium thiosulphate to be used in the
determination of ozone concentration will be purchased. Commercial titanium dioxide (TiO 2)
to be used in photocatalytic degradation will be obtained. Natural zeolite will be sourced and
used as biomass and catalysts support during biodegradation and photodegradation,
respectively.
3.2.1. Ozonation
Ozonation will be carried out by adopting a method reported by Achisa et al. (2016). Ozone
will be generated from the ozone generator and bubbled through the wastewater contained in
the ozone reactor. Ozone will be bubbled from the bottom of the reactor via a gas diffuser.
The ozone flow rate will be determined using gas rotameter. Unutilised ozone will be
captured in the off gas and directed through KI solution in a gas absorption container. The
concentration of the unutilised ozone will then be determined. During ozonation, samples will
be taken at predetermined time intervals and analysed to determine the extent of organic
solids solubilisation and increase in biodegradability. This will be determined through the
9
analysis of dissolved/undissolved chemical oxygen demand (COD), total suspended solids
(TSS), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), COD/BOD ratio and methane potential. The
ozonation intermediate and final products will be determined as well as their toxicity effect.
The extent of organic load reduction will be determined from BOD, COD and total organic
carbon (TOC) analyses, while biodegradability will be determined from COD: BOD ratio.
Total organic carbon reduction will be used in determining the extent of organic carbon
mineralization. For the COD analysis, a closed reflux method using dichromate solution as
oxidant, and Nanocolor colorimeter will be used for analysis. TSS and BOD will be
determined using standard procedures (Clesceri et al., 2005). Colour analyses will be done
using a UV-vis spectrophotometer.
Ion Chromatography will be used to monitor formation of inorganic products such as nitrates
and phosphates during AD and photodegradation. The intermediate and final products formed
during photodegration and ozonation will be analysed and determined using Gas
chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and Liquid chromatography–mass
spectrometry (LC-MS). The intermediates and products formed during the AOPs will assist
in proposing possible degradation paths and reaction mechanisms followed.
11
ozonation and photodegradation. For the factorial experiments, central composite CCD using
response surface methodology (RSM) will be used to design and optimise major operational
parameters for the individual processes and for the integrated process. RSM will be applied to
determine the individual and interactive effect of the major operational parameters, and
explore the relationship between the explanatory variables and the response variables. All
data analysis will be done using Microsoft Excel while STATA (statistical software) will be
used for statistical analysis. Further, analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used in error
analysis.
3.7. Budget
A total of R135 000.00 is expected to be spent during this study for the purchase of
equipment, materials and specialised analysis as shown in Table 2.
Table 2: Budget
MATERIAL/ACTIVITY COST (R)
Bioreactor, photoreactor, ozone reactor 60 000,00
Chemical reagents, materials, catalysts 20 000,00
12
Subsistence, travelling, field work 25 000,00
TOTAL 135 000,00
References
APOLLO, S. AND AOYI, O. (2016). Combined anaerobic digestion and photocatalytic
treatment of distillery effluent in fluidized bed reactors focusing on energy conservation.
Environmental technology, 37 (17), p. 1–9.
ARIUNBAATAR, J., PANICO, A., ESPOSITO, G., PIROZZI, F. AND LENS, P.N.L. (2014).
Pretreatment methods to enhance anaerobic digestion of organic solid waste. Applied
Energy, 123, p. 143–156.
ASILTÜRK, M. AND ŞENER, Ş. (2012). TiO2-activated carbon photocatalysts: Preparation,
characterization and photocatalytic activities. Chemical Engineering Journal, 180, p.
354–363.
BECHAMBI, O., NAJJAR, W. AND SAYADI, S. (2015). The nonylphenol degradation under UV
irradiation in the presence of Ag–ZnO nanorods: Effect of parameters and degradation
pathway. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 0, p. 1–6.
BOUGRIER, C., ALBASI, C., DELGENÈS, J.P. AND CARRÈRE, H. (2006). Effect of ultrasonic,
thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic
biodegradability. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 45 (8),
p. 711–718.
BRAGUGLIA, C.M., GIANICO, A., GALLIPOLI, A. AND MININNI, G. (2015). The impact of
sludge pre-treatments on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion efficiency:
Role of the organic load. Chemical Engineering Journal, 270, p. 362–371.
CHAIPRAPAT, S. AND LAKLAM, T. (2011). Enhancing digestion efficiency of POME in
anaerobic sequencing batch reactor with ozonation pretreatment and cycle time
reduction. Bioresource Technology, 102 (5), p. 4061–4068.
CHU, L., YAN, S., XING, X.H., SUN, X. AND JURCIK, B. (2009). Progress and perspectives of
sludge ozonation as a powerful pretreatment method for minimization of excess sludge
production. Water Research, 43 (7), p. 1811–1822.
DURGAKUMARI, V., SUBRAHMANYAM, M., SUBBA RAO, K. V., RATNAMALA, A.,
NOORJAHAN, M. AND TANAKA, K. (2002). An easy and efficient use of TiO2 supported
HZSM-5 and TiO2 + HZSM-5 zeolite combinate in the photodegradation of aqueous
phenol and p-chlorophenol. Applied Catalysis A: General, 234 (1–2), p. 155–165.
HALDER, J. AND ISLAM, N. (2015). Water Pollution and its Impact on the Human Health.
Journal of Environment and Human, 2 (1), p. 36–46.
13
HAQUE, F., VAISMAN, E., LANGFORD, C.H. AND KANTZAS, A. (2005). Preparation and
performance of integrated photocatalyst adsorbent (IPCA) employed to degrade model
organic compounds in synthetic wastewater. Journal of Photochemistry and
Photobiology A: Chemistry, 169 (1), p. 21–27.
JI, Q., TABASSUM, S., HENA, S., SILVA, C.G., YU, G. AND ZHANG, Z. (2016). A review on the
coal gasification wastewater treatment technologies: Past, present and future outlook.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 126, p. 38–55.
KARCI, A. (2014). Degradation of chlorophenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates, two
representative textile chemicals, in water by advanced oxidation processes: The state of
the art on transformation products and toxicity. Chemosphere, 99 , p. 1–18.
KIM, H.C., CHOI, W.J., MAENG, S.K., KIM, H.J., KIM, H.S. AND SONG, K.G. (2014).
Ozonation of piggery wastewater for enhanced removal of contaminants by S.
quadricauda and the impact on organic characteristics. Bioresource Technology, 159, p.
128–135.
KIM, J., KIM, K., YE, H., LEE, E., SHIN, C., MCCARTY, P.L. AND BAE, J. (2010). Anaerobic
Fluidized Bed Membrane Bioreactor for Wastewater Treatment. Environmental science
& technology, 45 (2), p. null-null.
MANTZAVINOS, D., SAHIBZADA, M., LIVINGSTON, A.G., METCALFE, I.S. AND HELLGARDT,
K. (1999). Wastewater treatment: Wet air oxidation as a precursor to biological
treatment. Catalysis Today, 53 (1), p. 93–106.
MECHA, A.C., ONYANGO, M.S., OCHIENG, A., FOURIE, C.J.S. AND MOMBA, M.N.B. (2016).
Synergistic effect of UV-vis and solar photocatalytic ozonation on the degradation of
phenol in municipal wastewater: A comparative study. Journal of Catalysis, 341, p.
116–125.
MECHA, A.C., ONYANGO, M.S., OCHIENG, A. AND MOMBA, M.N.B. (2016). Impact of
ozonation in removing organic micro-pollutants in primary and secondary municipal
wastewater: Effect of process parameters. Water Science and Technology, 74 (3), p.
756–765.
OLLER, I., MALATO, S. AND SÁNCHEZ-PÉREZ, J.A. (2011). Combination of Advanced
Oxidation Processes and biological treatments for wastewater decontamination—A
review. Science of The Total Environment, 409 (20), p. 4141–4166.
OTIENO, B., APOLLO, S., NAIDOO, B. AND OCHIENG, A. (2016). Photodegradation of
Molasses Wastewater Using TiO 2 -ZnO Nanohybrid Photocatalyst Supported on
Activated Carbon. Chemical Engineering Communications, 6445 (11), p. 1443–1454.
14
OTIENO, B.O., APOLLO, S.O., NAIDOO, B.E. AND OCHIENG, A. (2017). Photodecolorisation
of melanoidins in vinasse with illuminated TiO 2 -ZnO/activated carbon composite.
Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 0 (0), p. 1–8.
ROY, R., HAAK, L., LI, L. AND PAGILLA, K. (2016). Anaerobic digestion for solids reduction
and detoxification of refinery waste streams. Process Biochemistry, 51 (10), p. 1552–
1560.
SANTOS, D.C., SILVA, L., ALBUQUERQUE, A., SIMÕES, R. AND GOMES, A.C. (2013).
Biodegradability enhancement and detoxification of cork processing wastewater
molecular size fractions by ozone. Bioresource Technology, 147, p. 143–151.
SHIVARAJU, H. (2011). Removal of organic pollutants in the municipal sewage water by Tio2
based Heterogeneous Photocatalysis. International Journal of Environmental Sciences, 1
(5), p. 911–923.
STRONG, P.J., MCDONALD, B. AND GAPES, D.J. (2011). Combined thermochemical and
fermentative destruction of municipal biosolids: A comparison between thermal
hydrolysis and wet oxidative pre-treatment. Bioresource Technology, 102 (9), p. 5520–
5527.
TALEBIAN, N., AMININEZHAD, S.M. AND DOUDI, M. (2013). Controllable synthesis of ZnO
nanoparticles and their morphology-dependent antibacterial and optical properties.
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 120, p. 66–73.
VALERIE, N. (1999). Municipal wastewater characterization: Application of denitrification
batch tests. Thesis Submitted to the University of Natal.
ZHEN, G., LU, X., KATO, H., ZHAO, Y. AND LI, Y.Y. (2017). Overview of pretreatment
strategies for enhancing sewage sludge disintegration and subsequent anaerobic
digestion: Current advances, full-scale application and future perspectives. Renewable
and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, p. 559–577.
VAN ZYL, P.J., WENTZEL, M.C., EKAMA, G.A. AND RIEDEL, K.J. (2008). Design and start-up
of a high rate anaerobic membrane bioreactor for the treatment of a low pH, high
strength, dissolved organic waste water. Water Science and Technology, 57 (2), p. 291–
295.
15