Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Girls Higher Education in Germany in The 1930s PDF
Girls Higher Education in Germany in The 1930s PDF
Girls Higher Education in Germany in The 1930s PDF
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Contemporary History
Jill Stephenson
41
courses were devised which would prepare girls for university study,
and in 1901 the universities of Baden - Freiburg and Heidelberg -
were the first to admit women to full matriculation. The Prussian
educational authorities, the most powerful in Germany, accepted these
reforms only reluctantly and gradually, but the breakthrough came in
1908. The other states followed this example, and by the outbreak of
the first world war all German universities were open to women and all
the states provided courses to educate women to the standard required
for university entrance.2 Although the State remained reluctant to
spend money on senior schooling for girls,3 the real barrier to complete
equality of educational opportunity was now one of prejudice, not
statutory disability.
It was the first world war which gave women the opportunity to
show that they could make a valuable contribution in areas hitherto
closed to them, in the field of administration and organised social
work.4 The end of the war brought with it a new regime, the Weimar
Republic, on whose Constitution of 1919 was focussed the hopes of
those groups which were under-privileged in education - the
working-class, Jews, and the female sex - for more equitable treatment.
But by no means everyone was impressed by the contribution
women had made to the war-effort, and there certainly remained many
who deplored the influx of women into the universities during the war,
as a result of the reforms effected before it. Strong opposition to
female students from within the academic world was voiced by one
Berlin professor, who felt that study 'is not suitable for the feminine
nature', but rather 'undertaken in imitation of the masculine nature'.
His colleague, the famous Professor Wilamowitz, was loudly applauded
when he supported this point of view with the words: 'There is a whole
lot of girls among whom one can see no reason for the desire to study
other than that it is just the fashion'. Reporting this incident in August
1918, Maximilian Harden, the political journalist, commented dryly
that this new fashion was certainly preferable to the old practice of
teaching girls nothing, and prophesied that the time would come when
Germany would not be able to do without the service of educated
women in schools, administration, and social works
On the whole, the pious hopes enshrined in the Weimar Constitution
remained unfulfilled. But there were some real changes, most
noticeably in the universities. The end of the war resulted in
overcrowding at the universities partly because of the shortage of
employment opportunities caused by demobilisation and economic
dislocation. The need for graduates in many fields actually made this
under 14,000, well below the quota. But the aim of restricting girls to
10 per cent of all new entrants was not realised; although a
proportionately smaller number of girls was admitted in 1934 than in
1933, the figure for 1934 was still as high as 12.5 per cent.40
It was in fact the very success of the quota law which led Rust to
rescind what he termed an 'only temporary measure' in February 1935,
when it had been in force for little more than a year and effective for
only the 1934 intake of students.4" Application of the law was not,
however, the only reason for the reduction by one-third of the total
number of students in the three-and-a-half years after 1931, when
student numbers had indeed been abnormally high.42 Part of the cause
was that the smaller numbers of children born during the first world
war were now reaching university age. In addition, matriculation had
generally been delayed, rather than averted, by the introduction of
compulsory Labour Service for all school-leavers wishing to proceed to
higher education; thus, potential new students for the summer semester
of 1934 did not in fact matriculate for the first time until winter
1934-35.43 The reintroduction of conscription in March 1935 also
affected student numbers: the withdrawal of young men to perform
military service before admission to university was an important factor
in the decline to 57,000 in the number of students in summer 1935;
this was the lowest figure there had been since 1916, in war-time. That
this was largely due to a reduction in the number of male students can
be seen from the fact that in 1935 the proportion of girls in the student
body had once again risen to almost 17 per cent.44
While the Technical Universities, which specialised in the applied
sciences and engineering, and in which the number of girl students was
always very small, followed a pattern roughly similar to that of the
conventional universities, the teacher-training colleges showed a
different trend. In 1935 these Hochschule fiir Lehrerbildung45 had a
record number of students, but the lowest-ever percentage of girls
among them, at 12 per cent; this was in contrast to a share of over 30
per cent only two-and-a-half years earlier.46 But a reduction of these
dimensions was not, apparently, considered sufficient, since in April
1936 Rust placed a firm restriction on the number of girls to be
admitted to teacher-training colleges. He explained that there were
already more than enough women senior school teachers, and, in
addition, a large number of students preparing for this career. In order,
therefore, to arrest the flow of girls into teaching, none was to be
admitted to a Prussian college in the winter semester of 1936-37. The
combining of the Prussian with the Reich Education Ministry at the
beginning of 19354 7 made it unlikely that this order would not also
apply to the small number of teacher-training colleges outside Prussia.
In order to avoid circumvention of the order by school-leavers, it was
also stipulated that no girl who was aiming to teach would be admitted
directly to a university; she must first spend two semesters at a
teacher-training college. Rust conceded that this restriction might be
lifted for the summer semester of 1937, but only to an extent
compatible with the demands of the labour market. Girls who would be
obliged by this measure to wait for a year before applying for a college
place were advised to perform Labour Service and, if possible, also to
engage in some form of domestic service or work on a farm.4
This last exhortation should not lead to the impression that the
entire measure was designed to prevent girls from receiving higher
education and preparing themselves for a career outside the home. The
Nazis always hoped, of course, that all girls would have some
experience of household tasks before they married, and that all young
people training for non-manual careers would have practical experience
of physical work; these aims could well be fulfilled in this enforced
period of waiting between school and college, which was very necessary
in view of the surplus of teachers over available teaching positions. The
limitation in this case did, however, apply only to girls, which was in
line with Nazi Party policy that men should have preference in career
opportunities to enable them to marry and support a family as early as
possible. But the admission of girls was only to be delayed, and not
prevented, since teaching was one of the occupations positively
regarded as suitable for women in Nazi theory.
Rust's restriction of April 1936 was, in fact, singularly ineffective: in
the winter semester of 1936-37 there was actually an increase in the
number of girls attending teacher-training colleges, to the extent that
there were almost twice as many as there had been even in the peak
year of 1931. Over one-third of these 1,500 girls attended the
two-year-old college in Hanover, which was exclusively for girl students,
while another 188 were at the new, all-female college at
Schneidemiuhl.49 Particularly in view of the fact that both these
colleges were in Prussia, it is clear that, for some reason, the Minister's
order was not being enforced, in spite of the stress he had laid on its
necessity. And yet, this does not seem to have been because Rust had
changed his mind, because in April 1937 he tried another tactic: he
decreed that in future the admission of girls to teacher-training colleges
should take place only once a year, in autumn, instead of twice a year,
as had formerly been the case. He also made it clear that while 1937
of male candidates.
But doctrine was not to be abandoned altogether, especially when it
could be reconciled with necessity; thus, retreat from one point of
earlier Nazi policy, for practical reasons, was matched by insistence on
the implementation of another. In January 1937 compulsory domestic
science and needlework, to the extent of four hours each week in the
first four semesters, were prescribed for all girl students at
teacher-training colleges who planned to teach in senior schools. This
was absolutely consistent with the Nazi aim of ensuring that all girls
received a 'womanly' education. But it should not be seen as an attempt
to guide girls towards housekeeping rather than a profession. That it
was an integral part of the anti-intellectualism of the Nazis and their
emphasis on the virtues of practical skills is shown by another clause in
the same order: this decreed compulsory courses in technical subjects
for the male students at the same hours as the girls had their homecraft
courses.54 This provision does, however, underline the Nazis' insistence
on the separate functions of the sexes. But there was only a degree of
actual segregation in the colleges, in spite of the Nazis' opposition to
coeducation. Of the twenty-eight teacher-training colleges, exactly half
were for students of both sexes, while eleven admitted only men, and
three were exclusively for women.5 5
The change in official policy, as exemplified by the new attitude to
teacher-training candidates, became increasingly apparent and urgent
from 1936 onwards. Early in 1937, Rust announced that in future
school-leavers were to be encouraged to enter the universities in greater
numbers, now that the Hochschulinflation was at an end, particularly in
order to study scientific and technical subjects. The Four Year Plan,
announced in September 1936, required a large number of chemists and
engineers, and the general expansion which would result from it would
mean a demand also for experts in every other discipline. In view of the
urgency of the matter, Rust declared that senior schooling was to be
shortened by one year.5 6
It was quickly made clear that the new policies were not to be
restricted to men. Accordingly the new course was dutifully supported
by the representatives of the women's organisations, in the same way
that the old ideas had been when they were in vogue. Trude Burkner,
national leader of the Bund deutscher Mddel, expressed the view that
girls of ability who wanted to enter a profession ought to attend a
university, since antagonism to the universities was 'not in accordance
with the attitude of the BDM'.5 7
But in spite of official exhortations, student numbers continued to
continued. In economics, the decline was less sharp, but equally steady:
while over 1,000 girls had been studying economics in summer 1931,
by 1937-38 there were only 194.70 Again, the Nazis might have
congratulated themselves on the effectiveness of their initial policy by
the end of 1937, had circumstances not changed and the need for
skilled personnel required to administer the new policies of the Four
Year Plan paralleled the need for scientists to operate it. The value of
women economists was explained and stressed in the various
publications directed specifically at women,71 and the number of girls
in economics departments began to revive.72
Particular attention was paid to the number of girl law students, now
considered too small. Dr Ilse Eben-Servaes, the expert on legal matters
in the Reichsfrauenfuhrung (National Women's Leadership) and leader
of the Nazi association of women lawyers, sent a circular to her
representatives throughout Germany in August 1937, asking how many
girl law students there were in each area and how far advanced their
studies were. She explained that although Hitler's ban on women
lawyers practising in the courts had led to some hardship among those
already established, there were many other areas in which women
lawyers would be increasingly necessary, including adoption law, the
rights of illegitimate children, the legal position of married women, as
well as work in the women's office of the Labour Front and in the
women's and other Party organisations. Dr Eben-Servaes astutely
predicted that 'in two or three years there will probably even be a great
shortage of male lawyers, which will favour women.. .'.73 Even though
girls' numbers in law faculties increased from this time, 1937,74 an
official in the Party's Hauptamt Wissenschaft (section for academic
affairs) observed in August 1939 that 'the sharp decline in the number
of young women lawyers is particularly undesirable .. .'. The tasks for
which women were especially suited, in welfare services and in women's
and young people's organisations, and which required legal training, had
proliferated rapidly, and so Dr Donke urged that 'each girl with
university entrance qualifications ought to consider whether she is
suited to a legal career rather than just medicine or teaching'.75 Once
the war had started, the shortage of legally-trained personnel, in the
civil service as well as in the profession, was so acute that it was decided
to shorten the curriculum in law faculties.76
It is clear, then, that the reasons for encouraging girls to take up
academic study in fields once pronounced unsuitable for them were
practical. Equally practical reasons, however, lay behind the continuing
discouragement, from 1936 onwards, of students from studying
had left a great shortage of recruits in these fields, which would have to
be made good by admitting women. Those carrying this responsibility
would be required to pursue their studies with real seriousness and
dedication, qualities regrettably lacking in a number of girls already in
universities; many girls, evidently, saw in university study a convenient
way of escaping war service, and would never complete their courses
successfully. Thus it was decided that girls judged as falling into this
category would be obliged, in the following semester, to give up their
places to soldiers returning on leave.79
Even if there had been no Four Year Plan and no second world war,
girl students and graduates would have been essential to the Nazi
scheme. A system based on elitism requires a corps of leaders. Rust
made this point to students at Lauenberg teacher-training college when
he expressed the desire to found in Germany universities on the model
of Oxford and Cambridge, which provided the leading element in
British public life.80 The network of organisations which the Nazis
built up to some extent before, and much more intensively after, the
Machtiibernahme needed leaders who were intelligent and educated as
well as devoted Party hacks. And this applied to women as well as men,
since the principle of keeping the sexes separate for most purposes was
basic to Nazi theory. After the early and unfortunate experience of
having a man, Dr Krummacher, as leader of the women's organisations,
the leadership of these was left to the women themselves, and although
the Reichsfrauenfiihrerin, (National Women's Leader) Frau
Scholtz-Klink, was ultimately responsible to Hess's office, the
day-to-day running of women's affairs was in their own hands.81
Therefore, as the official student magazine, Deutscher Hochschulfuhrer,
pointed out, in both 1938 and 1939, trained personnel was required for
the Deutsches Frauenwerk, in the Women's Section of the Labour
Front, in the BdM and the girls' Labour Service health offices, in the
Party's welfare organisation, the NS- Volkswohlfahrt, and even in
research institutes.82 As an example for this last category, there is the
case of Hildegard Behr, who received her doctorate in February 1937,
and later in the same year became a research worker in a genealogical
records office.83 The leader of the Nazi student organisation boasted
that the new Germany had opened up employment prospects for
women in a wide variety of fields requiring an academic education, and
had done this by guiding women graduates into occupations regarded as
suitable for women, in accordance with the Nazi spirit.84
It is clear that opinions as to what constituted areas of study and
employment 'suitable for women' varied; equally variable were the
two sexes. The boys did physically strenuous work on the Autobahnen
or on farms, while the girls were to find their sphere of activity chiefly
in domestic work, including the preparation of meals on a large scale in
communal kitchens, as well as needlework and gardening.89 The
Labour Service was of particular value at harvest time, and bringing in
crops was not considered too arduous a task for girls. As early as 1
August 1933, sixteen new Labour Service camps for girls were opened
in East Prussia alone, to bring together 180 students and 200
unemployed girls to gather in the harvest.90 The six months' statutory
service before matriculation was by no means all that was expected of
students; they came under considerable pressure to continue to perform
a period of service, generally of about ten weeks' duration, in vacations
each year. These stints were designated 'voluntary', but the student
organisations engaged in vigorous propaganda activity to encourage
their members to participate regularly.91 The exception to this was in
the early part of 1935, when voluntary service for girls already in the
universities was actually forbidden, although all male members of the
Deutsche Studentenschaft (National Union of Students) were at the
same time ordered to produce evidence of participation in the Labour
Service since the beginning of their studies before admission to the
summer semester. The reason here was that all places suitable for girls
were reserved for the school-leavers who were obliged to engage in
service.92 Provision was made for those girls who were physically
unable to perform strenuous work to fulfil their service qualification by
helping in the NS- Volkswohlfahrt, preferably, as might be expected, in
the section entitled 'Mother and Child'.93
Even if the nature of the work done by boys and girls tended to
differ, the general principles behind the student Labour Service applied
to both equally, so that the complaint could not be made that girls
were being discriminated against by being excluded, nor that they were
being privileged by being admitted to study straight from school. It was
largely for these reasons that girls had to be treated more like boys than
like other women in this context.
Much was made of the way in which the experience of Labour
Service gave 'new meaning' to a girl's course of study, promoting
greater seriousness of purpose and 'consciousness of responsibility'.
There were enthusiastic accounts of the willingness with which some
girl students voluntarily performed Labour Service before it became a
requirement, and of the spirit of comradeship that developed among
them in the camps.94 But the work was more than a means of involving
girl students in manual work on a communal basis, however salutary
From the very start, then, considerable interest was taken in girl
students by the Nazi Party. The first aim, which was also the first aim
NOTES
31. BA, R4311/427, letter from Frick to Reich Ministers and State
Governments, 5 October 1933; Paula Siber, Die Frauenfrage und ihre Losung
durch den Nationalsozialismus, (Berlin 1933), 30.
32. Otto Schuster in Wissen und Dienst, 1935, no. 1, 13.
33. Edith Runge in Wissen und Dienst, 1935, no. 2, 39-40.
34. BA, R36/1929, 'Gesichtspunkte fur die Berufsberatung der Abiturienten
in der Krise', letter of 16 February 1933.
35. BA, R43II/936, 'Ein Sieb fur das Studium', cutting from Vossische
Zeitung, 18 February 1933.
36. Joachim Haupt, Neuordnung im Schulwesen und Hochschulwesen,
Berlin 1933, 9.
37. 'Gesetz gegen die Uberfiillung deutscher Schulen und Hochschulen',
Reichsgesetzblatt, 1933, I, 25 April 1933, 225.
38. BA, R43II/936, 'Zahlenmassige Begrenzung des Zuganges zu den
Hochschulen', Wolffs Telegraphisches Biro, 28 December 1933.
39. See above, 7.
40. Deutsche Hochschulstatistik, (Berlin 1934/35), 4-5.
41. Report in Wirtschaft und Statistik, 1935, XV, no. 9, 334.
42. Conclusion drawn from figures given in Statistisches Jahrbuch: 1932,
426-27; 1933, 522-23; 1934, 534-35; 1935, 520-21.
43. BA, R43II/936, 'Das Diensthalbjahr der Studenten', cutting from
Vossische Zeitung, 9 March 1934.
44. Calculated from figures in Statistisches Jahrbuch, 1936, 544-45.
45. The Prussian Education Minister, Rust, issued orders on 20 April and 6
May 1933, to the effect that the classically-derived name Pddagogische Akademie
should be replaced by the truly Germanic Hochschule fur Lehrerbildung, as part
of the campaign to stamp out internationalism and make students more nationally
conscious. This is described in Schumann, op. cit., 21, and Haupt, op. cit., 22-23.
The orders affected most colleges, since in 1933 eight of the ten teacher-training
colleges in Germany were in Prussia (Statistisches Jahrbuch 1934, 538).
46. Calculated from figures given in Statistisches Jahrbuch: 1936, 547-48;
1933, 526-27.
47. Eilers, op. cit., 55.
48. 'Studium der Abiturientinnen, die Studienratinnen oder Volksschullehre-
rinnen werden wollen', Deutsche Wissenschaft, Erziehung und Volksbildung (here-
after DWEuV), 1936, no. 288, 8 April 1936, 209.
49. Conclusions drawn from figures given in Statistisches Jahrbuch, 1937,
582.
50. 'Aufnahme an den preussischen Hochschulen fur Lehrerbildung, Herbst
1937', DWEu V 1937, no. 255, 21 April 1937, 241-42.
51. BA, R43II/938b, 'Rust eroffnet Hochschule fur Lehrerinnenbildung,
Koblenz', Deutsches Nachrichtenburo, no. 1532, 10 November 1937.
52. 'Aufbaulehrgange fir Madchen von der Volksschule zur Akademie fur
Lehrerbildung', Die Frau, December 1939, 84.
53. Calculated from figures given in Statistisches Jahrbuch: 1939/40, 620;
1941/42, 645.
54. Institut fur Zeitgeschichte Archiv (hereafter IfZ), MA 1163, frame
95585, 'Entwurf einer Reichsregelung der Ausbildung fur das Lehramt an h6heren
Schulen', 16 January 1937.
77. 'Aufhebung der Sperre des Neuzugangs zum zahnarztlichen Studium und
zum Dentistenberuf, DWEu V 1937, no. 200, 22 March 1937, 187.
78. Calculated from figures given in Statistisches Jahrbuch: 1932, 429;
1933, 525; 1938, 602; 1941/42, 641.
79. IfZ, MA 441/6, frames 2-757139 - 2-757141, 'Zur Lage an den
deutschen Hochschulen im Sommersemester 1942', Meldungen aus dem Reich,
no. 309, 16 July 1942.
80. 'Rede des Preussischen Kultusministers Rust bei der Einweihung der
landgebundenen Hochschule fur Lehrerbildung in Lauenberg, 24. Juni 1933',
quoted in Hiller, op. cit., 43.
81. Clifford Kirkpatrick, Nazi Germany: Its Women and Family Life,
(Indianapolis and New York 1938), 60-61; Organisationsbuch der NSDAP,
(Munich 1938), 154;'Nationalsozialistische Frauenarbeit', FK, April 1937, 8-9.
82. Gustav Adolf Scheel, 'Aufgaben und Erziehungsform des deutschen
Studententums', Deutscher Hochschulfuhrer 1938, 12.
83. Berlin Document Centre, File on Hildegard Behr, 'Lebenslauf, 27.
November 1937'.
84. Gustav Adolf Scheel, loc. cit.
85. IfZ, MA 205 NSDAP/HA-Wissenschaft, 'Die Frau im Studium', cutting
from FZ, 26 March 1939.
86. Jill McIntyre, op. cit., 188.
87. Otto B. Roegele, op. cit., 153.
88. BA, R43II/936, 'Das Diensthalbjahr der Studenten', cutting from
Vossische Zeitung, 9 March 1934.
89. Schumann, op. cit., 38.
90. 'Studentinnen beim Arbeitsdienst', VB, 8 September 1933.
91. 'Studentinnen, leisten freiwilligen Arbeitsdienst! ' Der Deutsche Student
(hereafter DS), January 1934, 61.
92. 'Das Amt fur Arbeitsdienst der Deutschen Studentenschaft teilt mit',
DS, February 1935, 152-54.
93. Homeyer, op. cit., E8.
94. Ruth Pagel, 'Vom Deutschen Frauenarbeitsdienst und seiner Bedeutung
fur die Studentin', DS, February 1935, 89-93; 'Studentinnen, leisten freiwilligen
Arbeitsdienst! 'DS, January 1934, 61.
95. BA, R36/1928, letter from the Oberburgermeister of Herford to the
Deutscher Gemeindetag, 8 February 1940.
96. IfZ, MA 205, NSDAP/HA-Wissenschaft, 'Der Arbeitsdienst der
Studierenden', cutting from Deutsche Allgemeine Zeitung, 23 February 1940;
Homeyer, op. cit., E9.
97. BA, R4311/938, 'Gemeinschaft studentischer Verbande, Deutsches
Nachrichtenbiiro, no. 157, 29 January 1935; Ibid., 'Auflosung studentischer
Verbande', Deutsches Nachrichtenburo, no. 157, 21 October 1935.
98. BA, Samml. Schumacher, 279-1, 'Die Neuorganisation des NSDStB', n.d.
99. Ibid., letter from the Reich Student Leader to all offices of the NSDStB,
22 April 1936.
100. Anna Kottenhoff, 'Aufgaben und Ziele der Studentinnenarbeit',
Deutsches Frauenschaffen 1938, 81.
101. Gustav Adolf Scheel, Die Reichsstudentenfuhrung, (Berlin 1938), 28.
102. Anna Kottenhoff, op. cit., 83.