Jhoanna Lyka C. Amor 4.

Computation:
2BSEcE-A [PART 1: REPLICATION]
R1 R2 R3 R12 R22 R32
4.74 4.31 5.17 22.4676 18.5761 26.7289
WASTE RUBBER TIRE WITH PALM OIL 5.33 4.84 4.22 28.4089 23.4256 17.8084
FUEL ASH FERROCEMENT BOARD 5.13 5.72 5.12 26.3169 32.7184 26.2144
5.43 4.87 7.15 29.4849 23.7169 51.1225
By
Christian Jay D. Baldeo
n R1 R2 R3 TOTAL
Ʃy 20.63 19.74 21.66 62.03
Ʃy2 106.6783 98.437 121.8742 326.9895
Data:
� 5.16 4.94 5.42
REPLICATION
TREATMENT
I II III
80%PC, 100%S,
4.74 4.31 5.17
a) CF
0%RF, 20%POFA
80%PC, 90%S, [ y]2
5.33 4.84 4.22 CF =
10%RF, 20%POFA n
80%PC, 85%S,
5.13 5.72 5.12 (62.03)2
15%RF, 20%POFA CF =
80%PC, 80%S,
12
5.43 4.87 7.15
20%RF, 20%POFA �� = ���. ����

1. Hypothesis: b) TSS
H0: There is no significant difference 2
TSS = y − CF
between the change of treatment
and the flexural strength of waste TSS = 326.9895 − 320.6434
rubber with palm oil fuel ash ��� = �. ����
ferrocement board.
Ha: There is a significant difference c) BSS
between the change of treatment ( y)2
BSS = [ ] − CF
and the flexural strength of waste n
rubber with palm oil fuel ash (20.63)2 (19.74)2 (21.66)2
BSS = [ + + ]
4 4 4
ferrocement board. − 320.6434
2. Test statistic: Use F-Test @α=0.05 ��� = �. ����
3. Rejection criterion: If Fc ≥ F0.05 [DF1,
DF2]
d) WSS
WSS = TSS − BSS n T1 T2 T3 T4 TOTAL
Ʃy 14.22 14.39 15.97 17.45 62.03
WSS = 6.3461 − 0.4616 Ʃy 2
67.7726 69.6429 85.2497 104.3243 326.9895

��� = �. ���� � 4.74 4.80 5.32 5.82

a) CF
e) MSB
BSS [ y]2
MSB = CF =
P−1 n
0.4616 (62.03)2
MSB = CF =
3−1 12
��� = �. ���� �� = ���. ����

f) MSW b) TSS
2
WSS
MSW = TSS = y − CF
n−P
5.8845 TSS = 326.9895 − 320.6434
MSW =
12 − 3 ��� = �. ����
��� = �. ����

c) BSS
g) Fc
( y)2
MSB BSS = [ ] − CF
Fc = n
MSW
(14.22)2 (14.39)2 (15.97)2
0.2308 BSS = [ + +
Fc = 3 3 3
0.6538 (17.45)2
+ ] − 320.6434
�� = �. ���� 3
��� = �. ����
[PART 2:TREATMENT]
T1 4.74 4.31 5.17 d) WSS
T2 5.33 4.84 4.22
WSS = TSS − BSS
T3 5.13 5.72 5.12
T4 5.43 4.87 7.15 WSS = 6.3461 − 2.2979
T12 22.4676 18.5761 26.7289
��� = �. ����
T22 28.4089 23.4256 17.8084
T32 26.3169 32.7184 26.2144
T4 2
29.4849 23.7169 51.1225
e) MSB
BSS ANALYSIS OF VARIATION
MSB =
P−1 Degrees Mean
Source of Sum of
2.2979 Variation
of
Square
of
Fc
F-
MSB = Freedom Square table
4−1 (SV) (SS)
(DF) (MS)
��� = �. ���� 2 0.4616 0.2308
REPLICATION 0.353 4.256
9 5.8845 0.6538
3 2.2979 0.7660
f) MSW TREATMENT
8 4.0482 0.5060
1.514 4.066

WSS TOTAL 11 6.3461

MSW =
n−P
4.0482 CONCLUSION:
MSW =
12 − 4 Since 0.353 < 4.256 and 1.514 < 4.066,
��� = �. ���� therefore, there is no significant
difference between the change of
g) Fc treatment and the flexural strength of
MSB waste rubber with palm oil fuel ash
Fc =
MSW
ferrocement board.
0.7660
Fc =
0.5060
�� = �. ����