Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135

www.elsevier.com/locate/joes

An assessment of oil spill detection using Sentinel 1 SAR-C images

Sudhir Kumar Chaturvedi a, Saikat Banerjee b,∗, Shashank Lele c
a Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248007, India
b Wingbotics, Kolkata 700086, West Bengal, India
c Metric Global, Pune 411036, India

Received 24 June 2019; received in revised form 11 September 2019; accepted 14 September 2019
Available online 18 September 2019

Abstract
Identification of an oil spill is additionally essential to evaluate the potential spread and float from the source to the adjacent coastal
terrains. In such manner, usage of Synthetic Aperture RADAR (SAR) information for the recognition and checking of oil spills has gotten
extensive consideration as of late, because of their wide zone inclusion, day-night and all-weather capabilities. The present examination studies
an oil spill occurred in the Al Khafji region by applying Sentinel 1 SAR-C images. Al Khafji is on the borderline between Saudi Arabia and
Kuwait in the Persian Gulf and it is detected as an unbiased zone. Al Khafji region can possibly deliver in excess of 7472.403 m³ barrels
of oil for every day (m³/d). Approaches dependent on multi-sensor satellite images examination have been produced for distinguishing oil
spills from referred to common leaks just as oil slick procedures. In this paper, one of these techniques is associated with Sentinel 1 images
of a known region of natural oil leakage and of an ongoing oil slick incident in Al Khafji zone. The Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is
perceived as the most significant remote sensing apparatus for the ocean and ocean waters oil slick examination, recording, documentation and
propagation. Specifically, this paper examines oil spills recognition in the Persian Gulf surveyed by utilizing Sentinel-1 (SAR-C) imageries.
Results demonstrated the significance of the VV polarization of the Sentinel-1 for recognizing oil-spills just as the diminished utility of the
VH polarization in this sole circumstance.
© 2019 Shanghai Jiaotong University. Published by Elsevier B.V.
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Keywords: Sentinel-1; Oil-spill; SAR; Ocean Poll; Polarimetry; Phase; Speckle filter; Ocean mask; Surface; Scattering; Sigma.

1. Introduction
Currently, there is a wide-ranging phenomenon that radar
polarimetry can give further data for conservational remote
sensing applications. In addition, a few Earth Observation
satellite missions will convey on board polarimetric SARs.
The primary affirmed SAR missions are ALOS/PALSAR
(2005, L-band), as of now in orbit, RADARSAT 2 (2007,
C- band), TerraSAR-X (2007, X-band), COSMO/Skymed
(2007, X-band), SAR-Lupe (2008, X- band). The prime orga-
nized SAR missions are MAPSAR (2008,L-band), TerraSAR-
L (2008, L- band), ECHO-L (2008,L-band), RADARSAT 3
(2009,C-band), TanDEM-X (2009,X-band). Some polarimet-
ric airborne SAR sensors are to be referenced: E-SAR of the
∗ Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: sudhir.chaturvedi@ddn.upes.ac.in (S.K. Chaturvedi),
bsaikat226@gmail.com (S. Banerjee), shashanklele@gmail.com (S. Lele).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2019.09.004
2468-0133/© 2019 Shanghai Jiaotong University. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
DLR (P-, L-, C-, X-band), EMISAR of the DCRS (L-,C-
band), RAMSES of the ONERA (P-,L-,C-,S-band) and the
AIRSAR system of the NASA/JPL (P-,L-,C-band), now neu-
tralized [1]. Subsequently, this has spurred the present exam-
inations over polarimetric SAR statistics to observe oil spills.
Just a couple of oil slick identification considers, in view of
polarimetric SAR information, have been directed in a years
ago. In a point-by-point physical and test contemplate on
the SAR-C/X-SAR imaging of biogenic and anthropogenic
images remains accounted for. Results demonstrate that the
damping conduct of a similar substance is conditional on the
wind speed. It is noted anyway that solitary slight contrasts
in the damping conduct of various substances were estimated
by SAR-C/X-SAR [2]. In a fundamental report on the uti-
lization of the Anisotropy parameter which is identified with
the Target Decomposition (TD) theory to improve oil slick
location is accounted for. The experimental study is formed
to utilize SAR-C/X-SAR images. Outcomes endorse that
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135
polarimetric SAR information can upgrade oil slick identifica-
tion. The proposed polarimetric Maximum Likelihood chan-
nel is tried over various blends of polarimetric data [3]. These
investigations usage AIRSAR information and measure the af-
fectability of entropy, anisotropy, and alpha qualities to Bragg
wave Marangoni damping by the spills as a component of the
occurrence edge and the wave incline circulations and wave
spectra in both the range and azimuth bearings by joining
estimations of the polarimetric direction point with the dete-
rioration parameter alpha [4].
Applications incorporate the mapping of surface topogra-
phies and, specifically, the unsupervised recognition and por-
trayal of twisting eddy highlights connected in a biogenic
slick-field. The essential methodology consolidates the uti-
lization of a Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) channel for
polarimetric SAR information adjusted from to best recognize
the ROIs and the utilization of the TD supposition to help oil
slick grouping. Note that this methodology can be settled into
a traditional technique. In this way, in an operational usage
is required to remove the additionally old style, for example,
non-polarimetric, highlights [5]. The supplementary crucial
procedure concerns the standard deviation of the phase differ-
ence (σ φc ). The σ φc , which has been utilized for characteriz-
ing diverse agronomic field, is demonstrated to be valuable to
help oil slick recognition. In an aspect, the capacity of σ φc for
recognizing among various blurry highlights over marine po-
larimetric SAR images are studied. Besides, since σ φc needs
just HH and VV statistics, it can be associated additionally on
dual-polarized SAR sensors, for example, the ASAR worked
on board of the ENVISAT satellite or the Sentinel-1 Level-
1 Ground Range Detected (GRD) SAR-C descriptions [6].
Investigations are directed on SAR-C/X-SAR C-band infor-
mation including highlights identified with oil spills. Results
demonstrate that the polarimetric SAR methodologies can ad-
equately recognize the ROIs and to assist classification. The
statistics for spills greater than 7 tones from tankers as per
INTERNATIONAL OIL TANKER OWNERS POLLUTION
FEDERATION - ITOPF statistics is shown in Fig. 1.
2. Marine pollution detection and discrimination
The utilization of optical satellite remote sensing for oil
spills have endeavored numerous times. The slick as of the
IXTOC I well walkover in Mexico was recognized utilizing
GOES (Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite)
and by the AVHRR (advanced very high-resolution radiome-
ter) on the Landsat satellite [7]. A blowout in the Persian Gulf
was in this method documented. The huge EXXON VALDEZ
smooth was identified on SPOT satellite information. Oiled
ice in Gabarus Bay coming about because of the Kurdistan
spill was identified by applying Landsat information. The
HAVEN spill nearby Italy was also supervised by satellite.
A spill in the Barents Ocean was surveyed by using an IR
band on NOAA 10. It is critical to take note of that, in every
one of these cases, the situation of the oil was known, and
information must be handled to see the oil, which as a rule
took half a month. More up to date discoveries demonstrate
117
that the capacity to identify oil might be a perplexing
capacity of conditions, oil types, and assessment limits [8].
There are a few issues related to depending on satellites
working in optical extents for oil slick remote sensing. The
first is the effectiveness and occurrence of overpasses and the
outright requirement for clear skies to perform optical work.
The chances of the overpasses and the reasonable skies hap-
pening in the meantime give an extremely low likelihood of
seeing a spill on a satellite image. This point is very much
outlined on account of the EXXON VALDEZ spill. Despite
the fact that the spill enclosed immense quantities of the ocean
for over a month, there was just one sunny morning that
matched with a satellite overpass, and that was on April 7,
1989 [9]. Another inconvenience of satellite remote sensing
is the trouble in creating calculations to feature the oil spills
and the long time required to do as such. For the EXXON
VALDEZ spill, it took more than 2 months before the main
gathering figured out how to "see" the oil spill in the satel-
lite symbolism, despite the fact that its area was absolutely
recognized. As of late, a few workers have endeavoured to
utilize MODIS obvious information to recognize oil spills.
These strategies by and large depend on auxiliary informa-
tion, for example, expected location or other satellite informa-
tion, to be effective. Be that as it may, Srivastava and Singh
utilized just MODIS to identify realized oil spills in Lake
Maracaibo, Venezuela. To begin with, the utilization of L1B
information outwardly showed oil; uncorrected highlights at
469 nm, 555 nm, and 645 nm demonstrated noteworthy signs
of oil [10–13]. The further examination demonstrated that the
proportion of the distinction and aggregate at 645 and 555 nm,
standardized by 469 nm, gave the best outcomes. All the more
as of late, a few workers utilized MODIS and other satellite
information to recognize the oil during the Macondo spill in
the US Gulf of Mexico.
There is some data on spills accessible from sensor pre-
cise direction. For instance, Chust and Sagarminaga utilized
the Multiangle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (MISR) sensors
on board a satellite to distinguish oil spills on Lake Mara-
caibo, Venezuela. This sensor utilizes nine push-broom cam-
eras at fixed edges from nadir to 70.5° to analyze specific
surfaces. An inspection of this angular sensor demonstrates
that preferred complexity was acquired over a straightfor-
ward nadir camera on another satellite. Statistics examination
demonstrated that oil spills show up in more noteworthy dif-
ferentiation in those view edges influenced by sun vivacity in
light of the proximity of oil. IR information from satellite has
been utilized to outline land oil contamination in Kuwait. It
was discovered that the old hydrocarbon-contaminated regions
appeared as much as 10 °C difference from the encompass-
ing area. Ground-truthing was utilized broadly in gathering
the information [14]. Casciello additionally made an endeavor
to utilize IR imagery from the thermal infrared area of the
AVHRR satellite to find recognized oil spills.
Lately, there have been various new satellite-borne SAR
sensors propelled as shown in Table 2. While one of
these sensors, RADARSAT-2, works in the typical C-band,
Sentinel-1, TerraSAR-X and COSMO-SkyMed work in the
118 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135

Fig. 1. Statistics for spills greater than 7 tones from tankers show a marked downward trend as illustrated above (SOURCE: UNCTAD Stat, quoted by ITOPF).

X-band, and the PALSAR sensor on ALOS works in the Table 1

L-band. As noted above, X-band is the favoured band for Current Satellite-borne SAR sensors.
oil slick remote sensing as far as Bragg scattering. Each of Satellite Launch date Owner/Operator Band
the four of these new SAR satellites has polarimetric imaging ERS-1 1991 (end 2000) European Space C
modes (some are investigative against operational modes) and Agency
a lot of higher spatial regions (down to 3 m) which may have ERS-2 1995 (end 2011) European Space C
application for oil slick remote sensing [15,16]. Sentinel-1, Agency
RADARSAT-1 1995 (end 2013) Canadian Space C
similar to its ancestor, is an operational business satellite that Agency
can be entrusted to react to calamity circumstances like real RADARSAT-2 2007 Canadian Space C
oil spills. As noted above, VV polarization gives a better clut- Agency
ter to noise ratio (CNR) over HH polarization for oil slick ENVISAT (ASAR) 2002 (end 2012) European Space C
location. Sentinel-1is completely polarimetric, and there is Agency
ALOS (PALSAR) 2006 (end 2011) Japan Aerospace L
awareness for examining whether a double polarization Scan Exploration Agency
SAR mode using VV/VH polarizations will work for oil and TerraSAR-X 2007 German Aerospace X
ship location, separately, as a feature of the Integrated Satel- Centre
lite Tracking of Pollution (ISTOP) program. The expanded Tandem –X 2010 German Aerospace X
number of SAR satellites in addition to the designs to work Centre
Cosmos 2007, 2010 Italian Space X
heavenly bodies of little satellites like COSMO (Constellation Skymed-1/2 Agency
of Small Satellites for Mediterranean basin Observation) will TecSAR 2008 Israel Aerospace X
deliver augmented temporal exposure with reentering times Industries
down to a few hours in certain circumstances [17]. The open Kompsat-5 2013 Korean Space X
door for expanded recurrence of image gathering ought to Agency
Sentinel-1 2013 European Space C
demonstrate helpful to the oil slick reaction matrix. For oil Agency
slick possibility arranging the accompanying data must be RADARSAT- 2018 Canadian Space C
auspicious given: constellation Agency
(3-satellites)
• The area and spread of oil slick over an enormous region;
• The thickness dispersion of an oil slick to evaluate the
amount of spilt oil; (Table 1). A case of oceanic contamination framework, that
• A grouping of the oil type so as to assess natural harm joins a few of these sensors, is spoken to by the Dornier
and to take suitable reaction exercises; DO 28 D2 airship. An armada made by 2 flying machines
• Any other important data to help clean-up activities. has been set-up by the German Federal Ministry of Transport
to screen the North and Baltic Ocean. Every one of them is
It must be noticed that this data can’t be conveyed by equipped with Side-Looking Airborne Radar (SLAR), UV/IR
a solitary sensor however just utilizing a blend of them scanner and MWR. Since 1991 the Dornier DO 228-212
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135
Fig. 2. A Sentinel-1 SAR-C-GRD-VH data of Al Khafji (28°25´N, 48°30´E), in which the marked area consists of oil spilling location has appeared in black
and white format. (Source: Copernicus Open Access Hub).
flying machine substitute the antecedent with a report on the
sensors portfolio that incorporates an LSF. To wrap things up,
multi-temporal perceptions can give significant data required
to show oil slick float and spreading [18,19]. Oil slick models
might be helpful for clean-up activities and controlling the oil
slick. Among the sensors recorded in Table 1, satellites out-
fitted with SAR are especially reasonable as early cautioning
recognition of oil spills, on account of the prevalence as far
as operability, inclusion and goals contrasted with different
sensors.
3. Oil spill monitoring by SAR data means of single
polarized data
Anthropogenic contributions of materials to the ocean sur-
face microlayer incorporate point sources as coast front mod-
ern movement, agricultural and storm-water run-off, spills of
mineral oil from coasts and vessels, normal oil leaks. The
lipids particles of oil (autonomously of the source it originates
from) are described by long tails of atoms which influences
the substance to stand out of ocean water. A consolidated im-
pact of their low water dissolvability and high intermolecular
fascination results in a high surface consistency and along
these lines a high short-wave damping impact through an
expansion in surface strain and a decrease in wind erosion
[20]. Imagining the normalized radar cross section (NRCS)
in a grayscale picture with low qualities given to dark and
high qualities given to white, the decrease of radar backscat-
ter brought about by the nearness of an oil slick shows up in
SAR images as the dark region (Fig. 2).
It is anyway obvious that SAR operability for oil slick
discovery is wind speed restricted. A low wind speed won’t
119
deliver the portrayed complexity as the outcome of the nonat-
tendance of wind-driven ocean narrow waves. In high wind
speed condition, oil surface damping decreases as increment
the vitality of ocean waves with oil beginning to get blended
with waves [21–23]. As per the discoveries in oil spills are no-
ticeable in the breeze speed energy 3–12 m/s. Since the ocean
is non-static water body, the destiny of spilt oil in the marine
condition relies on components, for example, the amount of
oil, the oil’s underlying physical and compound attributes, the
predominant climatic and ocean conditions and whether the
oil stays adrift or is washed shoreward. The different physical-
chemical-oceanographic procedures following up on spilt oil
are all in all known as enduring. Though a portion of these
procedures has a long-time scale (several years or more) they
impact the perceptibility in SAR images.
3.1. Spreading
As soon as the oil is spilt, it begins promptly to spread
once again the ocean surface. The speed at which this happens
depends, all things considered, on the thickness of the oil and
the volume spilt. In enormous marine, wind flow examples
will in general reason oil to shape restricted groups or parallel
to the wind direction.
3.2. Evaporation
The more unpredictable segments of oil will dissipate to
the environment. The rate of dissipation relies upon surround-
ing temperatures and wind speed. All in all, those oil seg-
ments with a breaking point beneath 200 °C will scatter in-
side a time of 24 h in tranquil conditions. The underlying
120 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135
spreading rate of the oil additionally influences the rate of
vanishing since the bigger the surface territory, the quicker
light segments will dissipate. Harsh oceans, high wind speeds
and thermal temperatures likewise increase disappearing.
3.3. Dispersion
The rate of scattering is generally needy upon the idea of
the oil and the ocean state, continuing most quickly with low
consistency oils within the sight of breaking waves. Waves
and choppiness at the ocean surface can make all or part
of a smooth separation into beads of fluctuating sizes which
become blended into the upper layers of the water segment.
3.4. Emulsification
Many oils take up water and structure water-in-oil emul-
sions. This can expand the volume of contamination by a
factor of up to multiple times. Arrangement of water-in-oil
emulsions decreases the rate of other enduring procedures and
is the principle explanation behind the steadiness of light and
medium rough oils on the ocean surface and shoreline. Al-
beit stable water-in-oil emulsions carry on comparatively to
thick oils, contrasts in their creations have suggestions for
successful reaction alternatives.
3.5. Dissolution
The rate and degree to which an oil slick breaks up relies
on its creation, spreading, the water temperature, choppiness
and level of scattering. Since just the most unpredictable oil
segments are marginally solvent, they vanish a lot quicker
than they break up.
3.6. Oxidation
It is unconventional by daylight and, despite the fact that
it happens for the whole term of the spill, its general impact
on dispersal is minor contrasted with that of other enduring
procedures.
3.7. Sedimentation
Oil droplets can associate with sediments particles and nat-
ural issue suspended in the water segment so the beads be-
come thick enough to sink gradually to the ocean. Sedimen-
tation is one of the key long-haul procedures prompting the
gathering of spilt oil in the marine condition.
3.8. Biodegradation
Ocean water contains a scope of marine micro-organisms
equipped for using oil mixes. Such living beings are increas-
ingly copious in zones with common leaks of oil. Sadly, the
diminished radar backscatter on the ocean surface is not spe-
cial to oil. Low winds, biogenic spills, wind protecting via
land or maritime structures, oil ice, inward waves, send wakes,
and union zones additionally make zones of decreased radar
backscatter. It is clear that a fundamental preparing of look-
ing in SAR images zones of low backscatter signal it isn’t
adequate as these marvels may cause false cautions. Among
this class of false alerts, biogenic spills, inner waves and ship
wakes are called look-alikes, as a rule, their shape takes af-
ter operational releases of oil, for example, vessel release of
bilge water from hardware spaces, fuel oil slime, slick stabi-
lizer water from fuel tanks.
The inscription on SAR oil slick recognition is immense as
during the most recent decade’s various methodologies have
been proposed. The researched strategies include hypotheti-
cal displaying of the damping proportion, ocean wave range
lessening by surface movies, SAR ocean surface reproduc-
tion and EM models, measurable and probabilistic classifier,
AI methods [24–26].
4. SAR polarimetry to observe oil spills
An examination on ocean oil spills perception by methods
for polarimetric Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) statistics is
accomplished. The first concern is the utilization of a polari-
metric Constant False Alarm Rate (CFAR) channel to identify
dark patches over SAR images and the utilization of the Tar-
get Decomposition (TD) hypothesis to recognize oil spills and
look-alikes. In the second methodology, the capacity of the
phase distinction standard deviation esteem (σ φc ) to recog-
nize among various dark highlights over marine polarimetric
SAR images is examined. The σ φc , assessed between the co-
polarized terms of the dispersing framework, needs just HH
and VV information and can be connected additionally on
dual-polarized SAR sensors, for example, the ASAR worked
on board of the ENVISAT satellite [27]. The σ φc an estima-
tion has been performed through a basic and viable channel,
which can help oil slick command. Analyses are directed on
polarimetric SAR information procured during the SIR-ClX-
SAR mission on April and October 1994. The information
was prepared and adjusted at NASA-JPL. Results demonstrate
that new polarimetric methodologies can help to group.
5. Contextual studies on radar polarimetry
In this segment, the radar polarimetry foundation theory is
given. Full polarimetric SAR sensors can quantify the total
2 × 2 dispersing matrix S:
 
Shh Shv
S= (1)
Svh Svv
where the primary subscript represents the transmitted po-
larization, either flat or vertical, and the second one for the
conventional. In the monostatic case, the correspondence the-
ory directs that the cross-polarized terms are equivalent, for
example Shv = Svh It is valuable to vectorize S. This can be
cultivated either by utilizing the lexicographic decay and by
the Pauli one:
 √ T
kL = Shh 2Shv svv (2)
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 121

The instance of pure polarization states, for example, a

1  T single basic polarimetric instrument, is described by H = 0,
kP = √ Shh + Svv Shh − Svv 2Shv (3)
2 while the complete depolarization case is portrayed by H = 1.
where the image T represents the transpose operator. As needs Every single other case is portrayed in the range 0–1. Note
are, the covariance matrix C and the coherence matrix T that Eq. (9) is reliable with the entropy definition in Von
are acquired by averaging the external result of kL and kP Neuman sense. The mean dispersing edge αˆ physically gives
vectors with their transpose conjugate (or adjoint vector), data about the isotropy of the scattering procedure and is
individually: characterized as pursues:
⎡   √  ∗
  ∗
 ⎤ αˆ = p1 α1 + p2 α2 + p3 α3 (11)
|Shh |2 2 Shh Shv Shh Svv
  ⎢√     √  
∗ ⎥
◦ ◦ ◦
where αˆ goes inside 0 − 90 and 0 portrays an isotropic
C = kL kL∗ = ⎣ 2 Shv Shh ∗
|Shv |2 2 Shv Svv ⎦ (4)
 ∗
 √  ∗
   surface. The anisotropy A, estimating the distinction between
Svv Shh 2 Svv Shv |Svv |2 the optional polarimetric dispersing instruments, is character-

T = kP kP∗ 
⎡      ⎤
|Shh + Svv |2 (Shh + Svv )(Shh − Svv )∗ ∗
2 (Shh + Svv )Shv
1 ⎢     
∗ ⎥
= ⎣ (Shh − Svv )(Shh + Svv )∗ |Shh − Svv |2 2 (Shv − Svv )Shv ⎦ (5)
2      
2 Shv (Shh + Svv )∗ 2 Shv (Shh + Svv )∗ 4 |Shv |2

where demonstrates the ensemble average and t represent

transpose conjugate. Note that both C and T are Hermitian
by definition. Increasingly imperative to note is the definite ized as pursues:
connection among T and the Muller matrix M the broad- λ2 − λ3
A= (12)
est portrayal of a complex polarimetric dispersing process. T λ2 + λ3
can be unambiguously related to deterioration into rudimen- Anisotropy A furnishes corresponding data regarding H
tary polarimetric dispersing systems. In actuality, under the and is relied upon to be of specific essentialness for low and
unitary change in the perplexing space, it is conceivable to medium H esteems. It may be abused to gauge surface rough-
revise the cognizance matrix as pursues: ness. In investigations of the ocean, marine scenes have as
T = UU−1 (6) been viewed as a low entropy surface overwhelmed by the
arrival from tilted-Bragg scattered [28]. Essentially, the free
where  is a 3 × 3 diagonal matrix whose components are surface backscatter is ruled by Bragg scatter estimated by the
the real non-negative eigenvalues of T, with λ1 ≥ λ2 ≥ λ3 and primary eigenvalue while the arrival from the smooth secured
U = [e1 e2 e3 ] is a 3 × 3 unitary matrix wherein: surface is because of numerous scattering component of sim-
⎡ ⎤ ilar quality. The normal alpha edge demonstrates the kind of
cosαi exp(j∅1i )
ei = ⎣sinαi cosβi exp(j∅2i )⎦ (7) dispersing instrument that is primary. Anisotropy might be
sinαi sinβi exp(j∅3i ) viewed as a parameter estimating small-scale surface rough-
ness. For ocean disperse, at L-and C-bands, A is dictated by
Along these lines, the coherence matrix T can be modified centimetric wavelength Bragg dissipate and don’t rely upon
as pursues: long wave tilting. Besides, H, a and A are roll invariant fac-

3 tors. Anisotropy is, furthermore, invariant in the azimuth di-
T= λi ei e∗i (8) rection and the range sequence and independent of changes in
i=1 the dielectric constant [29–31]. Every one of these angles has
Eq. (8) physically expresses that T can be disintegrated as persuaded the decision of H, αˆ and A in this examination.
a non-coherent aggregate of three autonomous rudimentary
6. Phase difference
polarimetric instruments. Further, three minimized physical
parameters can be characterized. The entropy H measures the
Every complex component of the scattering matrix and can
haphazardness of the complex polarimetric scattering process.
be composed as:
It may be likewise translated as a level of factual issue and  
is characterized as pursues: S pq = S pq e j φ pq p, q = h, v (13)

3 Along these lines, the scattering matrix appeared in Eq. (1),
H =− pi log3 pi (9) could be re-written as:
 
i=1 S e j φc Shv e j φx
S = e j φW hh j φx (14)
where pi qualities are given by: Shv e Svv
λi where φx = φhv − φvv = φvh − φvv and φc = φhh − φvv are the
Pi = (10) cross- and the co-polarized phase angles, separately. At the
λ1 + λ2 + λ3
122 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135

Fig. 3. Relevant to oil spill Constant false alarm rate (CFAR) filter. The symbol (+) indicates the application point, the two dark zones are the non-overlapping
regions.

point when a polarimetric SAR illuminates a terrain of an non-overlapping zones which pursue the complex Wishart cir-
ocean surface numerous scatters point add to the absolute culation, for example:
dissipated electric field gotten by the SAR receiving antenna, Z1 ∼ W(p, L, 1 ) and Z2 ∼ W(p, L, 2 ) where p is the
consequently each scattering amplitudes can be composed as: dimensionality of Z (and C) and equivalent to 3 for our sit-
uation, L is the feasible number of look and  in the mean

N
 n  jφ n potential’s matrix. The invalid theory H0 relates to the near-
S pq = S e pq (15)
pq ness of objective clutter where
n=1

Subsequently, under the theory of solid scattering regime, 1 = 2 (16)

the pdf of each stage point φ pq is consistently disseminated In detail, the experimental of the concept depends on the
over [−π π ] and thusly does not contain data about the scene assessment of the capacity - 2ρlogQ whose asymptotic dis-
geometrical and dielectric properties. Though, their stage con- tribution is given by:
trasts φ x and φ c may not be consistently disseminated and    
subsequently can be identified with the scene properties. Pre- p −2p log (Q ) ≤ T f = −p χ 2 ( f ) ≤ T f
    
cisely, while the pdf of φ x is typically consistently circu- + ω P χ 2 ( f + 4) ≤ Tf − p χ 2 ( f ) ≤ Tf (17)
lated over [−π π ], the pdf of φ c is roughly Gaussian in
where p{ · } is for probability and χ 2 (·) is the chi-squared
shape and its mean and standard deviation, mφc and σ φc ,
distribution, Tf is the reference threshold value, thus:
separately, are identified with the scene properties. However,
while both mφc and σ φc show varieties with surface rough- f = p2 (18)
ness, occurrence point and wavelength, the variety of mφc
 
are moderately smaller than σ φc ones [32,33]. The last can 2 p2 − 1 3
be viewed as a proportion of the level of relationship be- p=1− (19)
6p 2L
tween the co-polarized segments of the scattering context.
    
Accurately, σφc = 0◦ compares to a maximum connection be- f 1 2 f ( f − 1) 2 1 1
ω=− 1− + − (20)
tween the two co-polarized scattering amplitudes, along these 4 ρ 24 L2 (2L)2 ρ 2
lines the pdf of φ c conducts to deal with a Dirac delta work.
where:
σ φc > 100◦ is illustrative of an absolute uncorrelation and the  L L
Z1 | Z2 |
pdf of φ c conducts to deal with a uniform distribution. Q=2 (21)
|Z1 + Z2 |2L
7. The polarimetric filter what is more, represents the determinant administrator. In a
perfect world, the channel must be connected in all the po-
In this segment, the polarimetric channel utilized to semi- tential bearings. In the case of tentative statistics, four win-
automatically recognize dark patches, for example, conceiv- dows are considered, see Fig. 3. The Q value is processed
able oil spills, over polarimetric SAR images is demonstrated for each direction. The base Q esteem (Qmin ), relating to the
[34]. The channel has a place with the class of CFAR (Con- most likely edge bearing, is considered. The probability of
stant false alarm rate) channels and its basis is an overpassed false alert Pfa is identified with the limit Tf incentive as per
from now on. It utilizes the covariance matrix C and of the the accompanying relationship:
hidden complex Wishart appropriation, W ( · , · , · ).In exercise     
when a pixel is considered and two nearby non-overlapping p −2ρ log (Qmin ) ≤ T f  P χ 2 ( f ) ≤ τ f
    4
zones are characterized (Fig. 3), an experimental concept can +ω P χ 2 ( f + 4 ) ≤ T f − P χ 2 ( f ) ≤ T f ≡ 1 − Pf a
be connected over the related polarimetric information. In par-
(22)
ticular that the experimental of speculation is rejected the
pixel is marked as an edge. Specifically, orientation is made The trial of the theory outlined before can be conveniently
to the normal covariance matrix Z1 and Z2 related to the two connected additionally on inadequate covariance matrix, for
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 123

example, focuses on azimuthal symmetry. Note that, in the is given by the abundance of complex coherence: ρ˙ = ρeJ φ̄ ,
event that we influence the example C into the azimuthal sym- where ρ is the adequacy and φ̄ is the mean stage. When
metry case it does not pursue precisely the complex Wishart ergodicity is summoned, the maximum likelihood estimator
conveyance however the test measurement is as yet enforce- (MLE) of ρ is given by supplanting the desired administrator
able. Specifically, two fragmented covariance cases are of ex- with a spatial averaging window
ceptional intrigue: the azimuthal and the inclining activities.  
 L ˙ 
Application to such instances of the polarimetric channel re-  n=1 Shh [n]S˙vv
∗
[n]
quires a change of Q. Physically Tf relies upon the idea of ρˆ =  L , (27)
the surface pictures, area wind field, ocean state. Shockingly,
L ˙
n=1 |Shh [n]|
2 ˙
n=1 |Svv [n]|
2

this last information is not commonly accessible and when

Measurable investigation of ρˆ has been portrayed and its
accessible are regularly at various scale and additionally not
first moment E [ρ]ˆ changing the number of independent sam-
assembled [35–37]. Though, Tf is set by methods of rule of
ples L is given by:
thumbs. Despite the fact that this may sound harsh it opera-
tionally guarantees great outcomes. For peruse fulfillment, it   (L )(1 + 1/2 )  L
E ρˆ = × 1 − ρ2
must be noted anyway that some organizing elective method- (L + 1/2 )
    
ologies have been proposed in. In this examination the Tf is 3 1  2
exactly set once that the separating window size is dispas- × 3 F2 , L, L ; L + ; [1]; ρ (28)
2 2
sionately controlled by methods for a symbolism homogene-
ity investigation [38]. The part equality, which is physically As pointed out in, this gauge is one-sided, for example,
subject to the wind speed, is estimated following the rules estimations of low coherence are overrated. An elective strat-
detailed in. Practically, 20 WxW sub-images of the range im- egy to appraise the inter-channel connection is given by the
ages are considered to gauge the mean and the change of the standard deviation of the CPD. The CPD is characterized as
periodogram PG. The parameter σ W is given by: follows:

20  20 φ = ∠S˙hh S˙vv

∗
= φhh − φvv (29)
var (PGk )
σW = mean (PGk ) (23) The probability depth function (pdf) of the CPD for L =
mean (PGk ) k=1
k=1 1, φ̄ = 0◦ and shifting ρ in the scientific plan has been in-
The separating window size chose compares to the littlest ferred regarding the intricate coherence:
sub-images measure for which σ W is greater than the Vertical L  (L+1/2)/2
Direction Horizontal Direction (1 − ρ 2 ) (2L ) 1 L−1/2
p(φ) = L+1/2 √ PL−3 /2 (−β ) (30)
2 π (L ) 1 − β 2
8. Co-polarized phase difference (CPD) and coherence where, P(·) is the Legendre capacity of the main kind, (·)
is the Gamma work, and β = ρ cos (φ − φ̄) It is simpler to
TS-X gives rational SAR information in double polariza- translate the conduct of the CPD in views the inter-channel
tion SM mode in various combinations. For the perception relationship as pursue: when ρ will in general zero, for ex-
of marine oil spills the Co-Polar channels, for example, HH- ample, HH and VV channels uncorrelated, p(φ) keeps an eye
VV, are required. The Lexicographic scattering vector idea, on a uniform conveyance; when ρ approaches the unity, for
the maximum part characterization for completely captivated example, HH and VV channels completely connected, p(φ)
information, progresses toward becoming if there should arise tends out for a Dirac delta function [39–41]. It is obvious
an occurrence of double polarization (where the subscript D2 that the standard deviation of the CPD gives data on the
it indicates to the conceivable double polarization blend HH- inter-channel association. When ergodicity is summoned, the
VV): standard deviation of the CPD can be evaluated as:
 T 
   2
kD2 = S˙hh S˙vv (24)  1 L
  1 
L

σˆ =  ∠S˙hh [n]S˙vv
∗ [n ] 2 − ∠S˙hh [n]S˙vv
∗ [n] (31)
which leads to the following covariance matrix: L n=1 L n=1
     √ 
  |shh |2 S˙hh S˙vv∗
γ ρ˙ γ
Besides, in the Cramer–Rao limits of the two estimation
C2 = kD2 kD2 = 
H
   = η √ strategies are contrasted with dissecting their adequacy. It is
S˙vv S˙hh∗
|S˙vv |2 ρ˙ ∗ γ 1
noticed that for low coherence esteems (ρ < 0.3), σˆ gives
(25) a productive inter-channel connection estimation, while for
where the elements of C2 are: high accuracy esteems (ρ > 0.5), the effective estimator is
    ρ.
ˆ It is currently essential to connect the polarimetric model,
  |S˙hh |2 S˙hh S˙vv
∗
who is dependent on the inter-channel relationship assessed
˙
η = |Svv | γ = 
2
 ρ˙ =  (26)
|S˙vv |2   either through σˆ or ρ,
ˆ concerning SAR oil slick application,
S˙hh |2 S˙vv |2
for example, segregation of oil from look-alikes [42]. Slick-
The components of C2 characterized in Eq. (26) are knows free and weak-damping spills, for example, biogenic spills,
as control, polarization proportion and complex coherence. An transport wakes, requiring a high inter-channel connection are
immediate estimator of the co-polar inter-channel relationship relied upon to be described by:
124 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135

• Narrow CPD pdf → low σˆ values. section (NRCS) is utilized:

• High ρˆ values.
Oil-covered ocean surface, requiring a low inter-channel
connection, is relied upon to be portrayed by:
• Broaden CPD pdf →high σˆ values.
• Low ρˆ values.
In actuality, the two proposed estimators are relied upon
to be both ready to watch oils and to recognize them from
the weak-damping aspect. The proposed model has been tried
without precedent for X-band dual-polarized HH-VV coher-
ence SAR statistics. For the estimation σˆ and ρ,
ˆ diverse win-
dow extents are assessed and the impact of the instrument
commotion is considered.
9. Radar cross section and speckle
For monostatic radar, the received power from a point tar-
get P is given by the radar condition:
sp ! λ2 A2w
PR (τ ) = PT τ − 2 .σ · (32)
c (4π )3 (s p )4
where PT is the conveyed power, PR is the contracted power
and σ the point target radar cross segment (RCS). The RCS
−
→ −→
is characterized regarding the incident ( Ei ) and scattered (Ei )
EM fields as:
−
→2
2 | Es |
σ = lim 4π s p − → (33)
r p →∞
| Ei |2
what’s more, can be viewed as the captivating region of
an isotropic reflecting object that intercepts the transmitted
power and dissipates that power back. With these findings
Eq. (24) moves toward becoming:
   
√ s (t ) 4π
SRY (τ, t ) = Aw .Lc . σ · g τ − 2 .exp −i s (t )
c λ
(34)
where Lc incorporates producing losses and formulating of
the SAR point target reverberation data, for example, σ , of
the point target. System standardization factors. A concluded
sign is then conceivable to separate physical When the radar
illuminations a characteristic discrete section with a surface
roughness on the size of the radar wavelength, the returned
sign is the aftereffect of a convenient impedance of waves
reflected by the rudimentary scatters inside the area’s cell.
This procedure is because of the high affectability of the stage
term with separation.
It is known as spot and portrayed in Fig. 4. Fig. 4(a) it
refers to the context of a hypothetical area that contains a
solitary scatterer, while Fig. 4(b) to an increasingly practical
situation where point scatterers are haphazardly appropriated
in the cell. Fig. 4(c) demonstrates the spot development in
the perplexing plane. The irregular area of the basic scatterers
differs their separation from the radar and, in this manner a
change of σ starting with one area cubicle then onto the next
is set up. For separate division the normalized radar cross
−
→
σ  4π s2p | Es |2 
σ0 = = (35)
A0 A0 |− →2
Ei |
where A0 is the lit-up zone. It speaks to the normal σ of fac-
tually indistinguishable scatterers per unit zone. Since spot
hampers the image elucidation and order, it is moderated by
multi looking supervision or spatial averaging. In the main
case, the standard deviation diminishes with the square foun-
dation of the quantity of autonomous aspects, while in the
second case the measure of spot decrease relies upon chan-
nel’s portion and on connection properties of the single aspect
image.
10. Rough surface scattering
The collaboration between the transmitted radar EM sig-
nals with the Earth’s surface is represented by the surface
roughness and dielectric properties (accepting irrelevant en-
vironmental impact in the microwave range). The noticeable
surface roughness relies upon the EM occurrence wavelength,
implying that at diminishing frequencies the surface seems
lesser unpleasant. This turn, for example, a harsh surface
detected at X-band (λ = 3 cm) into a smooth surface at L-
band (λ = 23 cm). The surface roughness is characterized by
the Rayleigh or Fraunhofer Criterion. The Rayleigh basis ex-
presses that a surface might be viewed as smooth if the stage
contrast between two reflected beams is not exactly π /2 rad,
which prompts:
λ
h < (36)
8 cos θ
where h is the standard deviation of the surface roughness.
At the point when the EM wavelength is in the application
of h, the Fraunhofer model is utilized:
λ
h< (37)
32 cos θ
The complex dielectric steady is a proportion of the
medium reaction to an EM signal. This reaction is made out
of two sections, and characterized regarding open and the
imaginary portions as the capacity of the episode wave recur-
rence f:
ε ( f ) = ε  ( f ) − jε  ( f ) (38)

where ɛ (f) is referred to the permittivity of the material, while
ɛ (f) is indicated to the dielectric calamity factor of the mate-
rial. It isn’t unpredicted to refer to the relative permittivity ɛr ,
i.e., εr ( f ) = ε( f )/ε0 , where ɛ0 is the permittivity of vacuum.
For most common surfaces ɛ (f)  ɛ (f). The permittivity of
the material ɛ(f) effects the infiltration perspicacity (δ p ) of the
EM signal into the medium. δ p is by definition, the separation
in the medium over which the force of the spreading radia-
tion is constricted by the exponential factor e−1 . Following
this definition, a supportive δ p articulation (known as skin
complexity) as the capacity of ɛ(f) is given by,
√
λ ε
δp = (39)
2π ε 
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 125

Fig. 4. Illustration of the scattering type inside the resolution cell. (a) Point scatterer; (b) Randomly distributed scatterers in one resolution cell; (c) Speckle
formation.

10.1. Bragg-Scattering phenomena

The Bragg-Scattering clarifies the impacts of the reflection

of electromagnetic waves on periodic structures whose sepa-
rations are in the scope of wavelength. The phenomenon was
researched in 1912 by William Lawrence Bragg and William
Henry Bragg with X- ray beams and their appearance in crys-
tal lattices. The periodic structures of reflective surfaces or
volumes can be researched with the much larger wavelength
utilized in radar devices.
As the occurrence angle of the ERS SAR is oblique to
the nearby mean angle of the sea surface, there is no direct
specular reflection with the exception of at high ocean states.
It is hence expected that from the first approximation Bragg
resonance is the essential component for backscattering radar
pulses. The Bragg equation characterizes the sea wavelengths
for Bragg scattering as a function of radar wavelength and
incidence point:
λr = 2 λs sin θ
λr
λs = sin θ
2
Where,
λr = Radar wavelength
λs = Sea surface wavelength
Ѳ = Incident angle (also known as “Bragg angle” in this
case)
The short Bragg-scale waves are enclosed in response of
wind pressure. On the off chance that the ocean surface is
undulated by a light breeze with no long waves present, the
radar backscatter is because of the segment of the wave range
which resonates with the radar wavelength. The threshold
windspeed esteem for the C-band waves is assessed to be
at about 3.25 m/s at 10 m over the surface. The Bragg reso-
nant wave has its peak ostensibly at right edges to the range
course. For surface waves with peaks at a point φ to the radar
observable pathway (see the Fig. 5) the Bragg dispersing rule
Fig. 5. The Bragg Scatter phenomenon.
is:
λr . sin φ
λ s = = λs . sin φ (42)
2 sin θ
where: λ s is the wavelength of the surface waves propagating
(40) at angle φ to the radar line- of sight.
The SAR directly depictions the spatial circulation of the
Bragg-scale waves. The spatial conveyance might be influ-
(41) enced by longer gravity waves, through tilt regulation, hydro-
dynamic adjustment and speed packing. Besides, factor wind
speed, changes in stratification in the environmental boundary
layer, and variable flows related with upper sea course high-
lights, for example, fronts, eddies, inward waves and lower-
most topography effect the Bragg waves.
11. Bragg surface scattering for oil spill ocean surface
Other than surface properties, there are various natural
variables (e.g., wind speed and heading in respect to the radar
bar) and sensor associated parameters (e.g., rate edge, polar-
ization and recurrence) that influence the radar backscatter
from ocean surface. For instance, an expansion in wind speed
results in a rougher surface and a more grounded backscat-
ter signal. Radar backscatter is maxed if the radar looks the
upwind way and least if the radar looks toward the path nor-
mal to the wind attitude. The ocean backscatter is known to
126 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135
diminish with expanding rate point. The more grounded sign
is gotten in VV contrasted with HH and the distinction addi-
tions with rate edge and the relative dielectric steady [43].
The cross-polarization backscatter from ocean surface lays
around 5 dB beneath the HH one, and can therefore easily
reach the sensor noise floor (noise equivalent sigma naught,
NESN). The scattering from ocean surfaces is generally por-
trayed utilizing the Bragg dispersing model (little irritation
model). Ocean wave range contains waves running from short
swells of a couple of millimeters to overflows of many meters
stretched. In the basic instance of just short ocean wave parts,
the ocean backscatter inside average SAR frequency points
(20°−60°) is ruled by Bragg or echo scattering [44–46]. The
backscatter emerges from the reverberation of occurrence EM
wave (in the order of cm) with ocean wave segments with
comparative wavelength, for example, small and short grav-
ity waves. At the point when an approaching EM wave with
wavelength λ achieves the ocean surface, the transmitted sign
hits each progressive surface peak at a marginally unexpected
time. On the off chance that the abundance remove from the
radar to each peak is λ/2 (or a numerous of this), the stage
distinction between the arrival signals from each peak is 360°,
and the sign embrace phase. Else, they include out of phase.
The Bragg wavelength, λB , of ocean waves carrying about
reverberation is henceforth given by,
nλ
λB = (43)
2 sin θ
where n = 1,2, is the request of reverberation (n = 1 produces
the predominant return). From Eq. (43) it is clear that for
a given λ the resounding waves are shorter at progressively
diagonal frequency points and at a given θ , λB increments with
radar wavelength. The primary application ocean backscatter
coefficients σ 0 following Bragg hypothesis model are given
by
σ0X Y (θ ) = 4π k 4 cos4 (θ )|gX Y (θ )|2W (2k sin (θ ), 0 )
where W is the two-dimensional wave number unearthly depth
of the surface roughness and the records X and Y indicate
the polarization of the episode and backscattered radiation,
individually. The first-order dispersing coefficients gXY (θ ) for
horizontal-horizontal (HH) and vertical-vertical (VV) occur-
rence and backscattered polarization are given by
( εr − 1 )
gH H ( θ ) = " # $2
cos (θ ) + εr − sin2 (θ )
and
   
(εr − 1 ) εr 1 + sin2 (θ ) − sin2 (θ )
gvv (θ ) = " # $2
εr cos (θ ) + εr − sin2 (θ )
with cross-polarization (HV or VH) restores that are in-
valid. It is obvious from Eq. (44) that solitary the coefficient
gXY changes relying upon the occurrence/backscattered polar-
izations, thus σ0V V /σ0HH = gV V /gHH . It pursues that the pro-
portion of the backscatter coefficients depends just on θ and
ɛr , and is autonomous of surface roughness. It can henceforth
be utilized to assess the dielectric properties of the enlight-
ened surface. If second application terms in Eq. (44) are not
insignificant, depolarization impacts might be presented with
the outcome that the cross-polarization returns are never again
invalid.
12. Reflection of marine spills manipulating the co-polar
channel correlation
An examination manipulating dual-polarimetric X-band
SAR information to watch oil floating is included out of the
ocean. The polarimetric electromagnetic model proposed in
for oil spills perception in L-and C-band PolSAR informa-
tion predicts a Bragg (non-Bragg) scattering behavior as per a
high (low) inter-channel relationship between the co-polarized
channels, for example, HH and VV. The inter-channel con-
nection between the co-polarized channels can watch oil re-
leased drifting disposing of the essential class of look-alikes
described by weak-damping properties. The expansion of the
model in X-band PolSAR information it isn’t instantaneous,
as phenomena like grey layer and wave contravention, may
assume a role for this situation. Also, it is direct that, to take a
full yield of the model a reasonable and vigorous estimator is
a key issue [47–49]. The estimation of the inter-channel con-
nection is a minor issue and different techniques have been
created. In the standard deviation of the Co-polarized Phase
Difference (CPD) is proposed as an estimator of the inter-
channel relationship for the perception of oil spills.
13. Study zone and information
The Persian Gulf covers a territory of around 251,000 km2 s
and it is associated with the Gulf of Oman in the east by
the Strait of Hormuz. Its span is around 989 km and its
fringes incorporate Iran, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Emi-
(44) rates, Bahrain, Oman and Iraq. Ras Al Khafji or Al Khafji
(Fig. 6) is a significant region for oil extraction that has been
shared among Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Indeed, it is a con-
sidered as a nonpartisan zone; because of this terrible to miss
trademark in late history, it has been one of the fundamen-
tal explanations behind the Persian Gulf War in the start of
the 90 , the Battle of Khafji. It is on the outskirt between
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in the Persian Gulf, categorically
its directions are 28°25 N and 48°30 E.
(45) The present examination researches an oil slick occasion
in the Al Khafji area utilizing Sentinel 1 SAR images. Al
Khafji is on the outskirt between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait
in the Persian Gulf and it is viewed as an impartial zone. Al
Khafji area can possibly create in excess of 470,000 barrels
(46)
of oil for every day (Mbbl/d). Techniques dependent on multi
sensor satellite images (Sentine-1) examination have been pro-
duced for recognizing oil spills from referred to common
leaks just as oil slick occasions. In this paper, one of these
strategies is connected to Sentinel 1 images of a known region
of common oil flow and of an ongoing oil slick occasion in
Al Khafji zone. The Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) is per-
ceived as the most significant remote sensing device for ocean
S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 127

Fig. 6. Study area of the oil spill in the Persian Gulf of Al Khafji coastal zone. (Source: Google earth).

Fig. 7. Oil spill in the Persian Gulf of Al Khafji coastal zone. (Source: Copernicus Open Access Hub).
128 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135

Table 2
Band IW-VH and Band IW-VV.

Name Value Type Description

swath IW ascii Swath name
Polarization VH & VV ascii Polarization
band_names Amplitude_VH & Ampitude_VV ascii Corresponding bands
first_line_time 10-AUG-2017 02:47:14.363446 uint32 First zero doppler azimuth time
last_line_time 10-AUG-2017 02:47:38.047512 uint32 Last zero doppler azimuth time
line_time_interval 0.001495111824376032 float64 Time per line
num_output_lines 15,842 uint32 Raster height
num_samples_per_line 25,671 uint32 Raster width
sample_type DETECTED ascii DETECTED or COMPLEX
calibration_factor 99,999.0 float64 Calibration constant

14. Normalized radar cross section for sentinel 1 SAR-C

Over ocean, at C-band, the NRCS is an element of radar

Fig. 8. A Proposed methodology for oil spill detection in the ocean surface.
and ocean waters oil slick checking, recording, documenta-
tion and spread. Oil spills have been identified and described
by utilizing the SAR images over the Persian Gulf. Specifi-
cally, this paper talks about oil spills location in the Persian
Gulf evaluated by utilizing Sentinel (SAR) images. Results
demonstrated the appropriateness of the VV polarization of
the Sentinel-I for identifying oil-spills just as the decreased
utility of the VH polarization in this specific situation.
polarization, frequency point, just as ecological conditions,
for example, the wind field. For a given polarization and
wind speed, the NRCS diminishes with expanding occurrence
point. All things considered, the signal-to-noise proportion di-
minishes with occurrence points, prompting conceivable con-
tamination of thermal noise at high rate angle and under low
wind conditions. An appropriate noise correction is thusly ba-
sic to acquire a precise NRCS. The radiometric alignment of
S-1A considering clamor adjustment is communicated as
D N 2 − ηi
σ0 = (47)
A2i
#
where DN = (I 2 + Q2 ) is the computerized number of ESA
Level-l Single Look Complex (SLC) element. η is the de-
noise Lookup table (LUT) gave in explanation document, and
Ai is the alignment LUT for σ 0 as an element of azimuth
and range pixel, likewise explained in the Level-l items. Nu-
merous alignment methodology is consolidated in Ai , con-
taining territory standardization factor, adjustment steady, and
geophysical adjustment. Among which, the geophysical ad-
justment consistent, the NRCS distinction between SAR es-
timations and reenacted NRCS utilizing CMOD-IFR2 from
gathered ECMWF twists in the scope of [4n∨s, 10n∨s], is
given by the S-l Mission Performance Center for WV1 and
WV2, separately. In this paper, we process single σ 0 per pic-
ture at a goal of 20 km × 20 km. The NESZ is characterized
as the greatest estimation of histogram for NRCS with col-
located wind speed lower than 1 s−1 . We get 0.0001 for
WV1 and 0.00156 for WV2 in a straight unit. The NESZ-
corrected NRCS is utilized all through the remainder of this
paper except if especially expressed. Depictions with negative
NRCS are excluded in the examination on the grounds that
the backscattered sign is lower than the thermal noise.
15. CMOD5.N
The observational GMF, CMOD5.N, was produced for
worldwide applications for the utilization of the C-band scat-
terometer on board ERS-2 and advanced scatterometer (AS-
CAT). CMOD5.N performs superior to its ancestor CMOD5
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 129

Table 3
Sentinel-1 SAR-C data technical characteristics of study location.

Name Value Type Unit Description

PRODUCT_TYPE GRD ascii – SAR-C Product type
SPH_DESCRIPTOR Sentinel-1 IW Level-1 GRD ascii – Description
Product
MISSION SENTINEL-1A ascii – Satellite mission
ACQUISITION_MODE IW ascii – Acquisition mode
Antenna pointing right ascii – Right or left facing
BEAMS – ascii – Beams used
SWATH – ascii – Swath name
PROC_TIME 10-AUG-2017 06:32:28.298512 uint32 utc Processed time
ESA Sentinel-1 IPF 002.82 ascii – Processing system identifier
Processing_system_identifier
orbit_cycle 116 int32 – Cycle
REL_ORBIT 108 int32 – Track
ABS_ORBIT 17,855 int32 – Orbit
STATE_VECTOR_TIME 10-AUG-2017 02:46:05.436481 uint32 utc Time of orbit state vector
VECTOR_SOURCE – ascii – State vector source
incidence_near 30.76908302307129 float64 deg –
incidence_far 46.180789947509766 float64 deg –
slice_num 13 int32 – Slice number
data_take_id 122,615 int32 – Data take identifier
first_line_time 10-AUG-2017 02:47:14.363446 uint32 utc First zero doppler azimuth time
last_line_time 10-AUG-2017 02:47:38.047512 uint32 utc Last zero doppler azimuth time
first_near_lat 29.026329040527344 float64 deg –
first_near_long 49.133137677774606 float64 deg –
first_far_lat 29.43929100036621 float64 deg –
first_far_long 46.53496915362425 float64 deg –
last_near_lat 27.598276138305664 float64 deg –
last_near_long 48.81713938175293 float64 deg –
last_far_lat 28.0137882232666 float64 deg –
last_far_long 46.25429626431107 float64 deg –
PASS DESCENDING ascii – ASCENDING or
DESCENDING
SAMPLE_TYPE DETECTED ascii – DETECTED or COMPLEX
mds1_tx_rx_polar VH ascii – Polarization
mds2_tx_rx_polar VV ascii – Polarization
mds3_tx_rx_polar – ascii – Polarization
mds4_tx_rx_polar – ascii – Polarization
polsar_data 0 uint8 flag Polarimetric Matrix
algorithm – ascii – Processing algorithm
azimuth_looks 1.0 float64 – –
range_looks 5.0 float64 – –
range_spacing 10.0 float64 M Range sample spacing
azimuth_spacing 10.0 float64 m Azimuth sample spacing
pulse_repetition_frequency 1717.128973878037 float64 Hz PRF
radar_frequency 5405.000454334349 float64 MHz Radar frequency
line_time_interval 0.001495111824376032 float64 s –
total_size 3105 uint32 MB Total product size
num_output_lines 15,842 uint32 lines Raster height
num_samples_per_line 25,671 uint32 samples Raster width
subset_offset_x 0 uint32 samples X coordinate of UL corner of
subset in original image
subset_offset_y 0 uint32 samples Y coordinate of UL corner of
subset in original image
srgr_flag 1 uint8 flag SRGR applied
avg_scene_height 23.041930726105825 float64 m Average scene height ellipsoid
map_projection – ascii – Map projection applied
is_terrain_corrected 0 uint8 flag orthorectification applied
DEM – ascii – Digital Elevation Model used
geo_ref_system – ascii – geographic reference system
lat_pixel_res 99,999.0 float64 deg pixel resolution in geocoded
image
(continued on next page)
130 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135

Table 3 (continued)

Name Value Type Unit Description

lon_pixel_res 99,999.0 float64 deg pixel resolution in geocoded

image
slant_range_to_first_pixel 799,780.8407075724 float64 M Slant range to 1st data sample
ant_elev_corr_flag 0 uint8 flag Antenna elevation applied
range_spread_comp_flag 0 uint8 flag range spread compensation
applied
replica_power_corr_flag 0 uint8 flag Replica pulse power correction
applied
abs_calibration_flag 0 uint8 flag Product calibrated
calibration_factor 99,999.0 float64 dB Calibration constant
chirp_power 99,999.0 float64 – Chirp power
inc_angle_comp_flag 0 uint8 flag incidence angle compensation
applied
ref_inc_angle 99,999.0 float64 – Reference incidence angle
ref_slant_range 99,999.0 float64 – Reference slant range
ref_slant_range_exp 99,999.0 float64 – Reference slant range exponent

Fig. 9. The SAR-C image captured by Sentinel-1 Al Khafji oil spill in the Persian Gulf.

with better wind recovery exactness. It is routinely utilized for
operational sea surface breeze delivered by the Ocean and Sea
Ice Satellite Application Facilities. CMOD5.N is valid for oc-
currence points extending from 18◦ to 60◦ , covering the two
frequency angles of WV. CMOD5.N relates the NRCS to the
occurrence point, wind speed and wind heading (in respect to
radar line of sight), and polarization under impartial climatic
security with the accompanying condition:
σ 0 = B0 [1 + B1 cos (ϕ ) + B2 cos (2ϕ )]
where ϕ is the breeze course with respect to the receiving
wire look angle, B0 is the predominant term deciding the
size of NRCS for given breeze speed, and B1 fuses the up-
wind/downwind asymmetry of NRCS, while B2 communicates
the upwind/crosswind asymmetry of NRCS. The three terms
are on the whole elements of occurrence angle, wind speed,
and wind course. Coefficients for each term are yielded. It
is utilized all through the remainder of this paper to antici-
pate NRCS for given S-1A rate angle and gathered ECMWF
twists on a case to case premise.
16. Methodology
Sentinel 1A and 1B information were utilized for oil slick
(48)
examination. Distinctive polarization plans can be utilized for
checking oil spills. At the point when the radar sign is sent
to the ocean, oil spills can be recognized as a result of the
rinsing impact of oil on narrow waves. Radar images have
a favorable position for oil slick location as the oil can be
distinguished as dark fixes on images. Brightness temperature
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 131

Fig. 10. (a)VH polarized SAR data and (b) VV polarized SAR data.

Fig. 11. Profile plot for Amplitude VV of oil spill detection in the Al Khafji experiment zone.

is utilized in oil slick investigation too. The work process
succession of the handling for observing conceivable oil spills
on the ocean utilizing Sentinel 1 information has appeared in
Fig. 7.
Sentinel Application Platform (SNAP) programming is to-
gether created by Brockmann Consult and is utilized to pro-
cess Sentinel 1 Level 1 IW GRD images for the age of
geocoded, aligned (incline standardized), multilooked, de-
speckled sigma0_-VV item for VV polarization. The pre-
processing methodology of the SAR information is given
in Fig. 8. In the initial step of the preparing, Sentinel 1
exact circle documents that are accessible some time from
the generation of SAR information are connected due to
the low precision of the loop state vector provided in the
metadata.
Afterwards, thermal noise removal is done. Thermal
noise diminishes the precision of radar reflectivity evaluates
because of the foundation vitality in the SAR framework.
In the subsequent stage, the alignment of the VV polar-
ization computerized pixels is done by utilizing parameters
(framework subordinate) given in the SAR item file for
radiometrically adjusted backscatter values (sigma 0). SAR
images additionally incorporate dot commotion that can be
found in the picture as a salt-and-pepper impact. Multilook-
ing is a technique that diminished the characteristic spotted
appearance by utilizing two methodologies. Multilooked
images can be produced in the recurrence area utilizing sub
otherworldly transfer speed or space averaging of a single
aspect image, either with or without explicit 2D fragments
by convolution. The IW-VH and IW-VV band details and
132 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135
Fig. 12. (a) RAW SAR-C-VV data, (b) Ocean mask data from the processed
RAW data, (c) Geotagging of ocean mask with oil spill data on the map.
SAR-C-GRD Sentinel-1 product technical specifications are
elaborately given in Table 2 and Table 3 respectively.
SNAP utilizes the space area way to deal with resampling
images to a lower goal (mean GR square pixel as 20 m) to
diminish spot level utilizing multilooking for azimuth (1) and
range (1). While Sentinel GRD items are multilooked, dot
commotion decrease can be completed utilizing various chan-
nels considering the conveyance of the information. So as to
decrease the spot, dot separating choice is utilized by choos-
ing a 5 × 5 window estimate gamma guide channel in SNAP.
Two investigations can be given that propose gamma guide
channel. Contemplated the mean, middle, Lee sigma, local-
region, Lee, gamma MAP for spot commotion decrease on
SAR images. The gamma guide channel has the property of
saving edge data contrasted and different approaches. More-
over, they expressed that the gamma controller, Frost, and Lee
channels with a 5 × 5 kemel show better outcomes for SAR
images. Sudha and Vijendran (2017) utilized six channel pro-
cedures with five distinctive kemel sizes for decreasing dot
commotion on Sentinel 1 information, and they found that
7 × 7 window estimate gamma guide channel gave preferable
outcomes over different strategies. After the spot separating,
the territory redress is connected to yield information utilizing
Range Doppler Terrain Correction Operator in SNAP in light
of the fact that the separation between the SAR sensor and the
reflected surface can be contorted because of the gradient of
the sensor and topographic changes. The images ought to be
revised for these impacts in the landscape adjustment venture
by utilizing computerized height model (DEM). SRTM (3 s) is
utilized for DEM. In addition, the source GR Pixel separating
is gotten from the multilooking venture as 20 m in the range
and azimuth headings (square pixel) that speaks to remove on
the ground for a pixel. The pixel dividing for the subsequent
item is chosen as 20 m speaking to ground remove. WGS 84
datum was picked for guide facilitate framework in landscape
rectification bringing about a geocoded picture. The subset of
the territory of intrigue is modified from the terrain-corrected
image and changed over to dB.
17. Results and discussion
The Al Khafji oil slick in the Persian Gulf has seemed
(Fig. 9), and the enormous smooth of oil can be found in the
Sentinel 1 picture gathered in July 2017.
This paper focuses on the utilization of VV polarization
for oil slick recognition and checking in ocean and ocean
waters. Fig. 10(a) and (b) demonstrate that vertical polariza-
tion (VV) is desirable over cross-polarization (HV and VH)
for identifying oil spills. Practically, the occurrence of oil on
the ocean surface has a next with no impact on VH or HV po-
larized images as for its impact on the VV energized image,
thusly HV (VH) polarization are less valuable for identifying
oil spills.
The Profile Plot depending on a geometric shape, and the
correlative mode reflects about satellite information to in-situ
information. By utilizing the factual information of profile
plot for geometries: the qualities on the x-pivot are given
by the way length, that is, for a way containing 300 pixels
there are 300 x-values. The area pivot is dictated by the at
present chosen band. The plot shows the estimation of the
presently chosen band alongside the limits of a geometry.
And in this experiment, the threshold shift fluctuates at 3.8 dB
as shown in Fig. 11. This provides that in that particular
location a certain amount of oil spill is existing on the ocean
surface.
The blue shade around the plot line shows the standard
deviation of the chose band pixel contains the measure of
oil slick information on ocean surface inside a square box.
This specific standard deviation is an estimating unit that is
utilized to evaluate the measure of variety or scattering of a
lot of oil slick basic information esteems. It very well may be
seen that the blue shading line oscillates extraordinarily in the
vertical manner, which implies that the distinction between
the nearby pixels is enormous because of the speckle noise.
The most remarkable range in the profile guide is high blue
region. A few of blue line are engraved high position, despite
the fact that it is an oil spill zone. At the point when the oil
spill is identified utilizing the image having these qualities,
there is a high probability that the pixels in the section are not
delegated oil spill. In like manner, in the oil-free region, the
blue lines are seen to be generally lower than the dark blue
line. These pixels are almost certain to be delegated oil spill.
In this manner, the estimation of dark blue line is increasingly
viable in identifying oil spill.
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 133

Fig. 13. Histogram analysis for amplitude - vv of gathered SAR-C-GRD-VH oil spill data of Al Khafji.

Fig. 14. Scatter plot of VV polarized data oil spill data of Al Khafji.

A low standard deviation shows that the information fo-
cuses will, in general, be near the mean of the set, while
a select deviation demonstrates that the information focuses
are spread out over a more extensive scope of qualities with
an oil slick on the ocean surface as shown in Fig. 12(a). In
SAR advanced cartography, the land to ocean concealing is
habituated to covering or concealing highlights on a guide to
improve cartographic portrayal. In this concealing component,
the Raster information shows the spatial information of the
SAR picture. The raster data is processed to create an ocean
and land mask so that the oil spill can be detected on the
ocean surface as shown in Fig. 12(b). Later on, by applying
the geotagged ocean mask on google map the spill can be
seen and detect as presented in Fig. 12(c).
Each given region is partitioned into lines and sections,
which structure a customary matrix structure. Every receiver
inside this matrix contains a quality (a normal for a ge-
ographic element depicted by numbers or characters, com-
monly put away in an unlikely group, and connected to the
element. For instance, qualities of a well, articulated to by
a point, may incorporate profundity, siphon type, area and
litres-per-minute). In the systematic image, the oil slick ter-
ritory can be separating in all respects effectively as for the
coast visible zone by utilizing the histogram information.
The esteem scope of the geophysical image information of
undertaking area is equally separated into vessels. The his-
togram indicates what number of pixels of the picture fall
into every one of the containers on the oil slick area (Fig. 13).
In the Log10 scaled containers, not simply the band esteems
but rather their basic logarithms will be considered during
the calculation. Likewise, the receptacle sizes will be log10
scaled. In the subsequent plot, the x-pivot will demonstrate
134 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135
the log10 scaled band esteems so the reflectance of spill oil
and synthetic concoctions can be examined. In the disperse
plot examination of Al Khafji oil slick in the Persian Gulf
for each band, the esteem range is equitably separated into
512 bins. The disperse plot demonstrates these vessels plot-
ted against one another, subsequent in 512 × 512 cells. In
the scatter plot for every cell, the quantity of pixels of spill
area inside the concurring groups’ esteem reaches is tallied
and shading coded. Yellow represents a lot of pixels, dark for
little ones as shown in Fig. 14. On the off chance that no
pixel is allotted to an unmistakable cell, the cell will get no
shading by which the oil slick information can be produced
in all respects effectively.
Sentinel-l is not just the most significant remote sensing
instrument for the ocean and ocean waters oil slick location
and checking yet, in addition, the VV polarization gives pre-
ferred outcomes over different polarizations for location and
observing oil slick situations in marine condition. In this in-
vestigation, VH and VV polarizations have been tried for rec-
ognizing oil-spills and results indicated operating VV polar-
ization prompts more prominent exactness.
18. Conclusion
Satellite-based remote sensing is a viable instrument for
crisis circumstances where it is beyond the land of imagina-
tion to expect to perform quick and viable on-site estimations.
There are distinctive satellite missions to screen the Earth.
Sentinel l SAR satellite can be utilized to identify oil spills.
Observing of the course and extent of spilt oil on the ocean
surface, particularly because of calamities including marine
vessels, is significant as far as the biological system and natu-
ral impacts. In this investigation, SAR and Sentinel-1 satellite
images were utilized to resolve the productivity of oil slick
recognition. A notable natural catastrophe brought about by
an episode in Ild_1 r Bay was utilized for point by point in-
vestigation. The satellite images for the related dates in the
substages of this incident were exposed to various techniques.
The outcomes demonstrated that the oil slick region can be
distinguished by utilizing Sentinel 1 information utilizing VV
polarized images. The examination demonstrated that the oil
slick and smooth after an ocean occurrence can be resolved
rapidly, adequately, and economically with the guide of satel-
lite images. As more, various situations, including climate
instances and marine waves, ought to be considered in the
investigation so as to utilize remote sensing as a powerful
instrument for checking oil spills. The methods in this exam-
ination can be utilized to settle on fast choices about decreas-
ing ecological effects during and after any oil slick occasion.
MNF, morphology, and convolution channels were effectively
connected to Sentinel-1 information for oil slick assurance.
The outcomes reinforce the Sentinel 1 formulating results. It
is clear the VV picture is better for recognizing oil spills and
furthermore can be utilized to contrast between the VH and
VV polarization, for identification of oil spills in ocean and
ocean surface zone. The fundamental purpose behind effec-
tively by VV polarization for recognizes the oil spills, delicate
to the roughness of the ocean and ocean water’s surface. Two
significant factors for this situation: wind speed and wind
heading. Representation obtained at VV polarization by SAR
satellite is extremely delicate to wind speed inconstancy. Not
just concealment of the lean ocean and ocean water waves
by oil spills diminishes the surface roughness bringing about
less radar emissivity, backscatter and darker zone in images of
SAR satellites. As a result, in this study, each image used for
oil spill detection was optimized to produce a high accuracy
probability from the pixel-based ANN. Its results show that
the probability of detecting look-alike is significantly reduced
while ensuring the detection of oil spills. In addition, by re-
ducing the factors that cause false detection in pixel units,
the detection was successful even when the morphological
characteristics of the oil were not clearly revealed, such as
the case of the large oil spill accident. Thus, it is expected
that the accuracy of oil spill detection can be dramatically in-
creased with additional data, which could remove look-alike
regions such as low-wind zone and rainy cell. In addition,
the current algorithm uses a median filter to remove the ship
but it causes loss the detail of the image, so it will be more
effective to detect the ship using the ship detection algorithm
and lower the probability of the corresponding pixel in the
modified algorithm. It is also necessary to further study what
reduces the noise level of the texture map of the intensity
image effectively.
References
[1] B. Fiscella, A. Giancaspro, F. Nirchio, P. Pavese, P. Trivero, Int. J.
Remote Sens. 21 (18) (2000) 3561–3566.
[2] F. Del Frate, A. Petrocchi, J. Lichtenegger, G. Calabresi, IEEE Trans.
Geosci. Remote Sens. 38 (5) (2000) 2282–2287.
[3] A. Taravat, N. Oppelt, Sensors 14 (12) (2014) 22798–22810.
[4] L. Pulvirenti, G. Squicciarino, L. Cenci, G. Boni, N. Pierdicca,
M. Chini, C. Versace, P. Campanella, Environ. Model Softw. 102 (2018)
13–28.
[5] M. Bourassa, A. Stoffelen, H. Bonekamp, P. Chang, D.B. Chelton,
J. Courtney, R. Edson, et al., Proc. Ocean Obs 9 (2010) 21–25.
[6] E. Lancheros, A. Camps, H. Park, P. Sicard, A. Mangin, H. Matevosyan,
I. Lluch, Remote Sens. (Basel) 10 (7) (2018) 1098.
[7] F. Gutierres, A.C. Teodoro, E. Reis, C. Neto, J.C. Costa, in: Proceedings
of the Oceanfloor Mapping along Continental Shelves, Cham, Springer,
2016, pp. 69–104.
[8] E.A. Glinskis, V.H. Gutiérrez-Vélez, Land Use Policy 80 (2019) 95–106.
[9] M. Gade, A. Stoffelen, in: Proceedings of the Remote Sensing of the
Asian Oceans, Cham, Springer, 2019, pp. 81–101.
[10] S. Skrunes, C. Brekke, T. Eltoft, V. Miegebielle, in: Proc. 36th
Arctic and Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP) Technical Seminar on
Environmental Contamination and Response, Halifax, Canada, 2013,
pp. 498–514.
[11] Spies B.F. Land Cover Classification Using Multi-Frequency SAR over
Semi-Arid and Forested African Landscapes (Doctoral dissertation), De-
partment of Geography.
[12] P. Snoeij, E. Attema, M. Davidson, N. Floury, G. Levrini, B. Rosich,
B. Rommen, in: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Radar Conference, IEEE,
2008, pp. 1–5.
[13] D.J. Kim, W.M. Moon, Y.S. Kim, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.
48 (2) (2009) 852–863.
[14] A. Taravat, N. Oppelt, Sensors 14 (12) (2014) 22798–22810.
[15] S. Lohberger, M. Stängel, E.C. Atwood, F. Siegert, Glob Chang Biol
24 (2) (2018) 644–654.
 S.K. Chaturvedi, S. Banerjee and S. Lele / Journal of Ocean Engineering and Science 5 (2020) 116–135 135

[16] P. Snoeij, E. Attema, M. Davidson, B. Duesmann, N. Floury, G. Levrini, [31] C. Brekke, A.H. Solberg, Remote Sens. Environ. 95 (1) (2005) 1–3.
B. Rommen, B. Rosich, in: Proceedings of the 2009 International Radar [32] H.A. Espedal, Int. J. Remote Sens. 20 (1) (1999) 49–65.
Conference" Surveillance for a Safer World"(RADAR 2009), IEEE, [33] K. Topouzelis, Sensors 8 (10) (2008) 6642–6659.
2009, pp. 1–6. [34] M. Fingas, C.E. Brown, Oil Spill Remote Sensing. Handbook of Oil
[17] Y Liu, A MacFadyen, ZG Ji, RH Weisberg (Eds.), Monitoring and Mod- Spill Science and Technology (2015) 313.
eling the deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: a Record-Breaking Enterprise, [35] R. Shirvany, M. Chabert, J.Y. Tourneret, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Obs. Remote Sens. 5 (3) (2012) 885–892.
[18] G. Zhang, X. Li, W. Perrie, P.A. Hwang, B. Zhang, X. Yang, IEEE [36] H.A. Espedal, O.M. Johannessen, Int. J. Remote Sens. 21 (11) (2000)
Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 55 (8) (2017) 4766–4774. 2141–2144.
[19] M. Ottinger, K. Clauss, C. Kuenzer, Ocean Coast Manag. 119 (2016) [37] F. Nirchio, M. Sorgente, A. Giancaspro, W. Biamino, E. Parisato,
244–266. R. Ravera, P. Trivero, Int. J. Remote Sens. 26 (6) (2005) 1157–1174.
[20] D. Gee, A. Sowter, A. Novellino, S. Marsh, J. Gluyas, Mar. Pet. Geol. [38] H.A. Hovland, J.A. Johannessen, G. Digranes, in: Proceedings of the
77 (2016) 1338–1354. IGARSS’94-1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
[21] E. Ramsey III, A. Rangoonwala, T. Bannister, JAWRA J. Am. Water Symposium, 4, IEEE, 1994, pp. 2038–2040.
Resour. Assoc. 49 (6) (2013) 1239–1260. [39] M. Migliaccio, A. Gambardella, M. Tranfaglia, IEEE Trans Geosci Re-
[22] O.Y. Lavrova, D.M. Soloviev, M.A. Strochkov, T.Y. Bocharova, mote Sens 45 (2) (2007) 506–511.
A.V. Kashnitsky, in: Proceedings of the Remote Sensing of the Ocean, [40] M.F. Fingas, C.E. Brown, Spill Sci Technol Bull 4 (4) (1997) 199–208.
Ocean Ice, Coastal Waters, and Large Water Regions 2016, 9999, In- [41] B. Zhang, W. Perrie, X. Li, W.G. Pichel, Geophys Res Lett 38 (10)
ternational Society for Optics and Photonics, 2016, p. 99990G. (2011).
[23] A.G. Kostianoy, D.M. Soloviev, E.A. Kostianaia, A.M. Sirota, in: Pro- [42] A.B. Salberg, Ø. Rudjord, A.H. Solberg, IEEE Trans Geosci Remote
ceedings of the Skadar/Shkodra Lake Environment, Cham, Springer, Sens 52 (10) (2014) 6521–6533.
2018, pp. 89–120. [43] A.S. Solberg, R. Solberg, in: Proceedings of the IGARSS’96. 1996 In-
[24] M. Gade, B. Mayer, C. Meier, T. Pohlmann, M. Putri, A. Setiawan, Int. ternational Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 3, IEEE, 1996,
Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. (2017) 42. pp. 1484–1486.
[25] K. Nazirova, O. Lavrova, in: Proceedings of the 2018 OCEAN- [44] J. Lu, Int. J. Remote Sens. 24 (15) (2003) 3013–3032.
S-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–5. [45] G. Benelli, A. Garzelli, in: Proceedings of the IEEE 1999 International
[26] R. Pelich, M. Chini, R. Hostache, P. Matgen, C. Lopez-Martinez, Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS’99 (Cat. No.
M. Nuevo, P. Ries, G. Eiden, Remote Sens. (Basel) 11 (9) (2019) 99CH36293), 1, IEEE, 1999, pp. 218–220.
1078. [46] P. Liu, X. Li, J.J. Qu, W. Wang, C. Zhao, W. Pichel, Mar. Pollut. Bull.
[27] M.A. Fobert, J.G. Spray, V. Singhroy, Can. J. Remote Sens. 44 (4) 62 (12) (2011) 2611–2618.
(2018) 321–336. [47] G. Mercier, F. Girard-Ardhuin, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44
[28] M.K. Reif, H.J. Theel, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 13 (4) (2017) (10) (2006) 2839–2846.
614–630. [48] C. Hu, X. Li, W.G. Pichel, F.E. Muller-Karger, Geophys. Res. Lett. 36
[29] A.S. Solberg, G. Storvik, R. Solberg, E. Volden, IEEE Trans. Geosci. (1) (2009).
Remote Sens. 37 (4) (1999) 1916–1924. [49] M. Gade, W. Alpers, Sci. Total Environ. 237 (1999) 441–448.
[30] A.H. Solberg, C. Brekke, P.O. Husoy, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote
Sens. 45 (3) (2007) 746–755.