Response

Summary:

IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far with developing their teaching portfolio and
that the participant will need to update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the remainder of the
IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Q2. Please enter the your name (teaching mentor):
Alison Walton

Q1. Please enter the participant's first and last name:
Mary Curley

Q18. Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm submission):
MCurley@ecommunity.com

Q3. Teaching Log Progress:
Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are given? Does the participant
appear to be on target to complete the minimum requirements for IPTeC?

IPTeC Requirements:

Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health professional students

Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation of or assessment of
learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs, presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor
alone without learners does NOT count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care activities, project
management, etc.

On track to meet all IPTeC requirements

Q4. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:
Mary is doing well and on track for completing all requirements!
Didactic: All planned and set for Jan, April, May.
Experiential/Precepting: Served as co-preceptor and already lead topic discussions with student learners; Planned to
co-precept in March for Peds NICU; Also ID rotation in May and anticipate having students with her as well; Also will be
leading case studies at Butler for this semester.

Q5. Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and reflective. The participant
has considered his or her own personal approach to teaching and precepting.
Some improvement needed (detailed below)

Q6. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:
Initial draft completed - Mary will work with continue refinements. Encourage to ensure philosophy aligns with teaching
approaches that will be illustrated within teaching portfolio.

Q7. Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases, presentations) that reflect his or her
teaching philosophy.
Some improvement needed (detailed below)

Q8. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:
On track

Q9. Feedback Regarding Teaching:
The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from students, peers, and/or
preceptors.
Yes

Q10. Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:
Received feedback from preceptors, peers, and students thus far. Encouraged to continue to seek feedback especially
from student learners during case studies this semester.

Q11. Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she did exceptionally well during
the lecture, as well as opportunities for improvement. If a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the
participant adequately reflect what was done differently to make the lecture successful?
Some improvement needed (detailed below)

Q12. Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:
Encouraged to complete written reflections on teaching as completes activities this spring.

Q13. Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?
Portfolio not yet compiled but discussed required components to complete certificate

Q14. Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:
Discussed organization with portfolio.

Embedded Data:
N/A