Ericksen 1962 Cajamarca Crania

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Undeformed Pre-Columbian Crania from the

North Sierra of Peru’


MARY FRANCES ERICKSEN
Santiago, Chile

Although Indian skeletal material from bones present. Pottery from the tombs
Peru is very plentiful in local and foreign shows a strong coastal influence and is
museums, most of the collections came most similar to the Reichlens’ Cajamarca
from the Coast and most are not specifi- IV or later. It probably dates to the period
cally documented as to archeological hori- of Tiahuanaco and later Chimh expan-
zon. The crania reported on here are the sion. Translated into other terms, Caja-
first samples to be described from the marca 1-11 represents the Cursive style
North Sierra. Moreover they represent two of Kroeber and appears to be Regional De-
known periods of aboriginal occupancy, velopmental, perhaps 0-100 A.D., where-
and therefore provide a skeletal sequence as Cajamarca IV can be dated to about
from a single area. Such sequences have 1000-1200 A.D. or later. The Maqui-
not been hitherto studied in Peru, or for Maquis and Rumi-Lanchi materials were
that matter any place in western South collected during a reconnaissance expedi-
America. These circumstances provide a n tion sent to the San Pablo area in 1946 by
unusual opportunity to add substantially the late Julio C. TelIo, then Director of the
to our knowledge of the aboriginal racial Museo Nacional de Antropologia y Arqueo-
history of Peru. logia (Mejia, ’48, p. 48).
MATERIALS A N D METHODS It is important to note than San Pablo
lies on a tributary of the Rio Jequetepeque,
The 30 Peruvian Indian crania forming whose valley provides reasonably easy
the basis of the present report are from communications today from the Coast to
the District of San Pablo, Department of the Cajamarca basin and thence to the
Cajamarca, in the North Sierra. They con- Selva. This river valley was probably as
stitute a rarity, as all the cranial samples important a means of travel in prehistoric
published upon thus far have come from times as it is today. In addition the North
the South-Central and Southern Sierra. Peruvian Andes are much lower and less
Eight male and six female skulls are from rugged than in the South. The resulting
the site of Los Corredores de 10s Maqui- ease of communication between Coast,
Maquis, 6 km northeast of the town of Sierra, and Selva may be reflected in the
San Pablo. Skeletal remains are found in culture and racial history of the Caja-
chullpas and in caves in the sides of a marca area.
deep canyon, some of the chullpas stand- Sex determination on the skulls was
ing within the burial caverns; the material checked twice, but in the absence of post-
studied here was collected from the bone cranial skeletons there is doubtless some
heaps in the caves. In the Reichlens’ (’49) error in sexing. Age was judged by tooth
classification, the pottery collected in these eruption and exocranial suture closure.
caves corresponds to either Cajamarca I By far the majority were classed as “young
or 11. Six male and ten female skulls are adult” and only 4 of the 30 skulls showed
from the site of Rumi-Lanchi, 2 km north- sufficiently advanced suture closure to be
west of San Pablo. The Rumi-Lanchi
skulls came from multiple burials in rock 1This is one of a series of studies carried out in
tombs topped by large flat stones; these the Museo NacionaI de Antropologla y Arqueologfa
in Lima, Peru, from August 1949 to July 1952. An
tombs are reported to have contained more extended version of this report was submitted to
Columbia University in partial fulfillment of the
skulls than would account for the long requirements for the M.A. degree.

209
210 MARY FRANCES ERICKSEN

considered middle-aged. One female skull tables 3 and 4. The small numbers of
from Rumi-Lanchi shows a slight flatten- skulls in the two North Sierra samples did
ing of the left parietotemporal area; all not appear to justify the use of T - the
others are undeformed. sum of the t s - as a single figure meas-
Morphological observations were made ure of biological distance. Instead this
on the basis of my own judgement of the measure is provided by the percentage of
nature of the categories. Accordingly they mean differences significant at the 5%
are quite arbitrary, and are only used and 10% levels.
here to afford a comparison of the modes
of the Maqui-Maquis and Rumi-Lanchi MORPHOLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS
samples (table 2) and a more general
comparison of these modes with the ob- Table 2 presents the modal character-
servations of others. Mandibles were too istics of the Maqui-Maquis and Rumi-
few to merit either morphological or metric Lanchi samples where these modes in-
treatment. clude over 50% of the skulls. As a whole
Cranial measurements were taken as the Cajamarca skulls are characterized
indicated in table 1. Cranial capacities by high sagittal elevation, flat temporals,
were measured by lightly packing the flattened lambdoid region, low pinched
skulls with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and rather smooth occiput, and concavo-
seed and then measuring the seed in a convex nasal profile (see plates 1 and 2).
graduated cylinder. Areas of muscle attachment are not
Student's t was used to estimate the strongly developed, and the skulls appear
significance of the differences between the angular but rather gracile. Skull contour
means. In cases of widely differing vari- from norma verticalis is in most cases a
ances, the F, test was applied to deter- long ellipse in both samples, the gradually
mine the allowable degrees of freedom narrowing frontal matched by the elon-
(Walker and Lev, '53, pp. 155-158, 192- gated occiput. In the Rumi-Lanchi fe-
193). Mean differences significant at the males, the higher frequency of prominent
5% and the 10% level are indicated in parietal bosses makes for ovoid contours.
TABLE 1
Definitions of cranial measurements
Measurement Definition and instrument'
Glabello-occipital length Glabella - opisthocranion (midline), SpC
Maximum breadth Euryon - euryon, SpC
Basion-bregma height Basion - bregma, SpC
Minimum frontal breadth Frontotemporale - frontotemporale, SpC
Total facial breadth Zygion - zygion, SpC
Total facial height Nasion - gnathion, SIC
Upper facial height Nasion - alveolar point, S1C
Midfacial breadth Zygoma:-willare inferior -zygomaxillare inferior, SIC
Nasal height Nasion - nasospinale, S1C
Nasal breadth Max. diameter nasal aperture, SIC
Interorbital width Frontomalare orbitale - frontomalare orbitale, S1C
Subtense to interorbital width Subtense to nasion from frontomalare orbitale,
SlC, T
Left orbital height Perpendicular to breadth, S1C
Left orbital breadth Maxillofrontale - ectoconchion, SIC
Left dacryal orbital breadth Dacryon - ectoconchion, SIC
Biorbital breadth Ectoconchion - ectoconchion, SIC
Length of cranial base Nasion - basion, SpC
Length of facial base Basion - prosthion, S1C
Subnasion-basion length Subnasion - basion, SpC
External maxillary length Prosthion - alveolon, SIC
External maxillary breadth Ectomolare - ectomolare, SIC
Horizontal circumference Maximum circumference avoiding brow ridges, T
Sagittal arc Nasion - opisthion (midline), T
Transverse arc Porion - bregma - porion, T
1 Abbreviations for instruments used: SIC - sliding caliper; SPC - spreading caliper; T - steel tape.
PRE-COLUMBIAN CRANIA FROM PERU 21 1
TABLE 2
M o d a l characteristics of Cajamarca crania
~~

Maqui-maquis Rumi-lanchi
Characteristic
Males Females Males Females

Vault form ellipsoid ellipsoid ellipsoid ellipsoid


Brow ridges continuous continuous median
Glabella slight slight absent
Forehead height low medium high medium
Forehead slope s1.-med. slight slight slight
Postorbital const. pron. pron. pron. pron.
Frontal bosses slight s1.-med. s1.-med. large
Sagittal elev. large large large medium
Parietal bosses s1.-med. s1.-med. medium medium
Temporal fullness absent absent absent-sl.
Mastoid processes large medium large slight
Sphenoid depression large large large large
Occipital curve low low low low
Occ. curve degree pron. pron. pron. pron.
Occipital form pinched pinched pinched or bun pinched
Lambdoid flattening pron. pron. pron. pron.
Glenoid fossae sh.-med. shallow shallow shallow
Tympanic plates thin thin thin-med. thin
Auditory meatus round or oval round ova1 oval
Orbit shape oblong or square oblong oblong
Orbit inclination slight slight slight slight
Lat. malar proj. pron. med.-pron. pron. pron.
Ant. malar proj. pron. pron. pron. pron.
Nasion elevation no dep .-high high n o dep. high
Nasal profile concavo-convex concavo-convex concavo-convex concavo-convex
Nasal sills dull medium dull medium
Alveolar prog. medium medium s1.-med. s1.-med.
Midfacial prog. absent absent absent absent
Total prognathism slight sl .-med. slight slight
Palate shape parabola ellipse ellipse parabola or ellipse
Palate height low-med. low low low

Of the morphological characters con- Osteoporosis of the occiput and poste-


sidered typical of American Indians by rior portions of the parietals is common in
Newman ('47, p. 17), the two Cajamarca the Cajamarca samples. But aside from
samples share in the following: pro- the osteoporosis and rare injuries such as
nounced postorbital constriction and sphen- nasal fractures and depressed vault frac-
oid depression, small frontal bosses (ex- tures, other cranial pathology is almost
cepting the Rumi-Lanchi females), shallow wholly confined to the dental complex.
suborbital fossae, and pronounced ante- Apical abcesses are fairly frequent in the
rior and lateral malar projection. The Maqui-Maquis and Rumi-Lanchi samples,
high incidence of elliptical palates and with males showing a considerably higher
thin tympanic plates in samples from the incidence than females.
Central Peruvian Coast was considered
METRIC DATA
unusual for American Indians by New-
man. In the Cajamarca samples, all but The mean measurements of the Maqui-
the Maqui-Maquis male sample have at Maquis and Rumi-Lanchi samples are
least 50% elliptical palates. Thin tym- compared in tables 3 and 4 by means of
panic plates are also in the majority. t. The only mean difference significant at
While alveolar prognathism is typical in the < 10% level and consistent in both
the Cajamarca samples, facial prognathism sexes is in the cranial index. The earlier
seems to be low, and this observation is Maqui-Maquis sample is more dolicho-
borne out by the frankly orthognathous cranic by 2.9 to 3.7 index units, due in
mean gnathic index of the Maqui-Maquis large part to great mean head lengths. In
males. the females the difference in head length
212 MARY FRANCES ERICKSEN

is significant at the < 10% level, although styles; and ( 2 ) the chance that the greater
it is less significant in the males due to the frequency of skulls than skeletons in the
high variability in the Rumi-Lanchi stone tombs indicates the presence of more
sample. than one status group.
Except for the cranial index the Maqui- In any case it seems likely that the two
Maquis and Rumi-Lanchi samples appear Caj amarca samples represent a population
to be very similar. The males show only continuity, with modifications through
three mean differences significant at the time and outside admixture on the part of
< 5% level, while the females show none the Rumi-Lanchi sample. Whether the
at all. Several other possibly significant dif- shift in central tendency from dolicho-
ferences may be- masked by the high vari- crany to mesocrany represents the evolu-
abilities common in small samples. Two tionary brachycephalization summarized
additional factors bearing upon the higher for the New World by Newman ('61), or
variabilities of the later Rumi-Lanchi sam- is attributable to the presence of admix-
ple are: (1) the possibility of Coastal ad- ture with Coastal brachychycephals cannot
mixture, strongly suggested by the ceramic be settled here. It is, however, worth

TABLE 3
Measurements, indices, and statistical comparison Maqui-Maquis - Rumi-Lanchi
Males
Maqui-Maquis Rumi-Lanchi
Measurement
No. Mean S.D. No. Mean S.D. t
Head length 8 182.38 4.07 6 177.67 9.37 1.15
Head breadth 8 135.38 3.11 6 137.00 4.38 0.81
Head height 8 131.00 5.37 6 134.17 7.17 0.95
Minimum frontal br. 8 94.13 3.12 6 92.50 3.17 0.98
Total facial br. 5 137.80 6.14 3 131.33 4.93 1.54
Total facial ht. 3 116.00 4.58 1 105.00 - -
Upper facial ht. 6 68.17 0.98 5 66.20 3.70 1.16
Midfacial breadth 7 99.71 5.02 4 96.00 4.97 1.18
Nasal height 8 48.75 1.03 5 46.80 3.11 1.35
Nasal breadth 8 24.13 2.10 5 23.20 1.30 0.88
Interorbital width 8 97.00 4.93 5 95.40 1.14 0.88
Subtense to IOW 8 19.50 2.07 4 15.50 2.38 3.011
L. orbital ht. 8 34.50 2.00 6 34.17 1.60 0.33
L. orbital br. ( M ) 8 40.13 2.15 6 40.50 1.87 0.34
L. orbital br. (D) 8 39.63 2.00 6 39.17 1.72 0.45
Biorbital breadth 8 97.75 4.71 5 95.80 1.79 1.06
Nasion-basion 8 98.00 3.02 6 95.33 4.41 1.35
Basion-prosthion 6 96.67 3.50 5 95.40 4.93 0.50
Subnasion-basion 8 88.63 5.58 5 88.60 4.77 0.01
Maxillary length 6 53.67 2.16 5 52.60 3.29 0.65
Maxillary breadth 8 63.00 2.67 5 59.60 3.97 1.869
Cranial capacity (cma1 4 1357.50 100.10 6 1291.67 160.56 0.72
Circumference 8 512.50 8.40 6 508.83 16.40 0.55
Sagittal arc 8 370.62 10.50 6 368.83 19.35 0.22
Transverse arc 8 301.50 8.85 6 311.17 11.86 1.75
Cranial index 8 74.26 2.42 6 77.20 2.54 2.201
Length-height index a 71.84 2.93 6 75.54 2.32 2.541
Breadth-height index 8 96.82 4.75 6 97.91 3.60 0.47
Mean height index 8 81.65 5.13 6 85.26 2.49 1.58
Total facial index 3 84.34 7.52 1 81.40 - -
Upper facial index 3 49.90 3.46 3 50.04 3.44 0.05
Orbital index ( D ) 8 87.11 3.87 6 87.27 3.09 0.08
Nasal index 8 49.51 4.49 5 49.81 5.19 0.11
Maxillo-alveolar 6 117.75 4.94 5 113.32 3.58 1.67
Gnathic index 6 97.82 3.96 5 99.30 6.39 0.50
Cranial module 8 149.58 2.58 6 149.61 6.30 0.01
1 Significant at 5% level.
,Significant a t 10% level.
PRE-COLUMBIAN CRANIA FROM PERU 213
TABLE 4
Measurements, indices, and statistical comparison Maqui-Maquis- Rumi-Lanchi
Females
Maqui-Maquis Rumi-Lanchi
Measurement t
No. Mean S.D. No. Mean S.D.

Head length 6 175.17 3.60 10 169.20 6.65 2.01'


Head breadth 6 130.00 4.05 10 131.80 3.61 0.92
Head height 6 126.00 5.06 10 124.70 3.33 0.62
Minimum frontal br. 6 88.67 2.50 10 87.70 3.86 0.55
Total facial br. 5 124.60 2.51 8 123.50 3.89 0.56
Upper facial height 6 62.17 2.93 9 63.44 3.13 0.79
Midfacial breadth 5 94.00 5.79 8 89.50 3.34 1.80'
Nasal height 6 44.83 2.32 10 45.80 2.39 0.79
Nasal breadth 6 23.00 1.55 10 22.50 1.27 0.70
Interorbital width 6 91.83 3.66 9 90.00 4.27 0.86
Subtense to IOW 6 16.17 1.94 9 16.22 2.05 0.05
L. orbital ht. 6 33.33 1.63 10 33.10 1.40 0.29
L. orbital br. (M) 6 38.33 2.66 10 37.20 2.25 0.91
L. orbital br. ( D ) 6 37.33 2.25 10 36.70 1.95 0.59
Biorbital breadth 6 93.33 3.67 9 90.44 3.84 1.45
Nasion-basion 6 92.33 2.80 10 91.70 3.02 0.41
Basion-prosthion 6 90.50 3.02 9 89.56 2.70 0.63
Subnasion-basion 6 84.00 3.35 9 83.00 2.24 0.70
Maxillary length 5 48.60 2.88 8 49.50 2.33 0.62
Maxillary breadth 5 58.60 4.16 7 59.43 1.90 0.47
Cranial capacity 6 1191.67 69.12 10 1146.00 77.78 1.18
Circumference 6 493.00 8.27 10 485.90 13.92 1.13
Sagittal arc 6 360.83 7.52 10 352.40 11.10 1.64
Transverse arc 6 288.33 6.24 10 291.20 7.51 0.78
Cranial index 6 74.25 3.03 10 77.98 3.62 2.11'
Length-height index 6 71.97 3.44 10 73.82 3.87 0.96
Breadth-height index 6 97.00 4.95 10 94.66 3.19 1.16
Mean height index 6 82.60 3.73 10 82.91 3.26 0.17
Upper facial index 5 50.42 2.53 8 51.74 2.44 0.94
Orbital index (D) 6 89.42 4.26 10 90.38 5.48 0.37
Nasal index 6 51.41 4.39 10 49.27 4.10 0.98
Maxillo-alveolar 5 120.72 8.00 6 119.91 6.10 0.19
Gnathic index 6 98.03 2.24 9 98.32 2.51 0.23
Cranial module 6 143.72 2.14 10 141.90 2.40 1.52
'Signiticant at 10% level

noting that over a time period perhaps no used in measuring the San Damian sam-
longer than the one separating the Maqui- ple have been published in detail (New-
Maquis and Rumi-Lanchi samples, New- man, '47, pp. 39-40), and show only minor
man ('61) found a mean increase in cran- differences with those used in the present
ial index significant at the < 1% level in study. By remeasuring 60 skulls, New-
skulls from one Alabama site. man ('43, pp. 44-45) was able to adjust
In exploring the broader relationships Stewart's ('43) means to his own. Mac-
of the Cajamarca samples, four other Peru- Curdy's ('23) measurements on the Pau-
vian samples profitably serve for compari- carcancha sample, however, were based
son. These are the San Damian, Paucar- upon the International Conventions of
cancha, and Miscellaneous Chicama Monaco and Geneva, and Pezo Benavente's
series used in Newman's ('43) synthesis, ('46, p. 185) Calca sample was measured
and Pezo Benavente's ('46) series from according to the method prescribed by
the Inca ruins of Kinsarumiyoc, near HrdliEka ('39). Thus both MacCurdy and
Calca. The criteria used in selecting these Pezo Benavente probably measured gla-
series were absence of cranial defonna- bello-occipital length to the most posterior
tion, some degree of archeological docu- point regardless of the midline. Pezo
mentation, and reasonable comparability Benavente also differed in using the land-
of measuring techniques. The techniques mark endobasion, may have measured or-
TABLE 5
Measurements and indices of Peruvian series compared: male

Measurement Maqui-Maquis Rumi-Lanchi San Damian Paucarcancha Calca Misc. Chicama


-
Head length ( 8 ) 182.38 ( 6 ) 177.67 (65) 177.57 (67) 179.42 (29) 175.10 (65) 176.05
Head breadth ( 8 ) 135.38 ( 6 ) 137.00 (67) 139.72 (66) 135.45 (29) 135.35 (65) 139.65
Head height ( 8 ) 131.00 (6) 134.17 (66) 132.20 (67) 137.07 (29) 134.94 (63) 135.31
Minimum frontal br. (8) 94.13 (6) 92.50 (67) 90.75 (62) 92.31 (29) 90.48 (66) 92.08
Total facial br. ( 5 ) 137.80 ( 3 ) 131.33 (49) 135.69 (91) 133.93 (18) 135.00 (55) 135.29
Upper facial ht. (6) 68.17 (5) 66.20 (46) 71.98 (100) 67.81 (29) 66.79 (57) 67.41
Nasal height (8) 48.75 (5) 46.80 (66) 50.29 (112) 48.99 (27) 51.96 (65) 48.74
Nasal breadth (8) 24.13 (5) 23.20 (58) 24.02 (112) 24.25 (27) 24.75 (63) 24.58
Orbital height (8) 34.50 (6) 34.17 (61) 34.20 (107) 34.92 (27) 34.86 (58) 33.57 E
Orbital breadth (8) 39.63 (6) 39.17 (63) 38.17 (108) 36.83 (27) 38.51 (59) 39.08 2
Nasion-basion (8) 98.00 (6) 95.33 (66) 94.79 (117) 98.56 (29) 97.55 (63) 98.49 r
Basion-prosthion (6) 96.67 (5) 95.40 (53) 91.98 (104) 96.13 (29) 94.48 (57) 97.06
Ext. maxillary 1. (6) 53.67 (5) 52.60 (42) 52.57 (92) 52.35 (54) 53.35 E
0
Ext. maxillary br. (8) 63.00 (5) 59.60 (34) 63.44 (78) 63.98 (46) 63.95
Cranial capacity ( 4 ) 1357.50 ( 6 ) 1291.67 (64) 1388.20 (17) 1285.00
E
M
Circumference (8) 512.50 (6) 508.83 (66) 497.48 (29) 498.02
Sagittal arc ( 8 ) 370.62 (6) 368.83 (68) 365.72 (27) 367.66 :
z4
Transverse arc (8) 301.50 ( 6 ) 311.17 (29) 312.12 v)

Index
2!
~

Cranial index 74.26 77.20 (65) 78.87 75.50 (29) 77.70 80.16
Length-height 71.84 75.54 (65) 74.56 76.51 (29) 77.49 77.39
Breadth-height 96.82 97.91 (66) 94.68 101.21 (29) 99.90 97.13
Mean height 81.65 85.26 (63) 83.20 87.16l (29) 87.32 86.35
Upper facial 49.90 50.04 (43) 53.07 50.74 (18) 50.11 49.83
Orbital 87.11 87.27 (60) 89.43 95.07 (27) 90.86 86.00
Nasal 49.51 49.81 (60) 47.90 49.63 (27) 48.62 50.55
Maxillo-alveolar 117.75 113.32 (30) 120.97 122.17 120.17
Cranial module 149.58 149.61 (65) 149.91 150.30 (29) 148.81 149.51
1 From Stewart and Newman, '50, p. 33.
TABLE 6
Measurements and indices of Peruvian series compared: female

Measurement 1Maqui-Maquis Rumi-Lanchi San Damian Paucarcancha Calca Misc. Chicama

Head length ( 6 ) 175.17 (10) 169.20 (60) 169.63 (36) 169.50 (23) 167.73 (58) 167.35
Head breadth ( 6 ) 130.00 (10) 131.80 (60) 134.80 (36) 130.42 (23) 130.60 (58) 136.24
Head height ( 6 ) 126.00 (10) 124.70 (57) 124.58 (36) 128.56 (23) 128.34 (56) 129.29
Minimum frontal br. (6) 88.67 (10) 87.70 (61) 87.03 (42) 87.33 (23) 88.70 (58) 88.82
Total facial br. ( 5 ) 124.60 (8) 123.50 (53) 124.94 (58) 123.03 (18) 125.62 (50) 126.83
Upper facial ht. (6) 62.17 (9) 63.44 (44) 65.20 (55) 64.11 (22) 61.77 (50) 65.18
Nasal height (6) 44.83 (10) 45.80 (56) 46.50 (74) 45.72 (23) 48.79 (54) 47.01
Nasal breadth (6) 23.00 (10) 22.50 (56) 23.09 (72) 23.46 (23) 24.21 (53) 23.73
Orbital height (6) 33.33 (10) 33.10 (57) 33.05 (77) 34.19 (22) 34.00 (51) 33.79
Orbital breadth (6) 37.33 (10) 36.70 (58) 36.50 (77) 35.09 (22) 36.46 (52) 38.64
Nasion-basion (6) 92.33 (10) 91.70 (57) 89.62 (77) 93.52 (23) 92.57 (56) 94.13
Basion-prosthion (6) 90.50 (9) 89.56 (EO) 88.48 (66) 92.29 (23) 89.70 (49) 94.08
Ext. maxillary 1. (5) 48.60 (8) 49.50 (44) 49.73 (61) 50.15 (47) 51.53
Ext. maxillary br. (5) 58.60 (7) 59.43 (35) 60.40 (54) 59.83 (39) 59.99
Cranial capacity ( 6 ) 1191.67 (10) 1146.00 (39) 1216.54 (18) 1196.00
Circumference (6) 493.00 (10) 485.90 (35) 475.57 (23) 480.00
Sagittal arc ( 6 ) 360.83 (10) 352.40 (40) 352.00 (21) 351.30
Transverse arc ( 6 ) 288.33 (10) 291.20 (23) 299.00

Index

Cranial index 74.25 (10) 77.98 (60) 79.45 (36) 76.78 (23) 78.36 (58) 81.46
Length-height 71.97 (10) 73.82 (57) 73.53 (36) 75.94 (23) 77.24 (56) 77.13
Breadth-height 97.00 (10) 94.66 (57) 92.60 (36) 98.97 (23) 98.41 (56) 94.75
Mean height 82.60 (10) 82.91 (57) 81.96 (36) 85.89l (23) 85.51 (56) 85.46
Upper facial 50.42 (8) 51.74 (39) 52.44 (52) 51.15 (18) 49.35 (42) 50.66
Orbital index 89.42 (10) 90.38 (58) 90.62 (75) 97.53 (22) 93.92 (53) 87.68
Nasal index 51.41 (10) 49.27 (55) 50.09 (71) 51.55 (23) 50.13 (53) 50.44
Maxillo-alveolar 120.72 (6) 119.91 (34) 121.29 (53) 119.38 (38) 116.89
Cranial module 143.72 (10) 141.90 (57) 142.91 (36) 142.73 (23) 142.48 (56) 144.19
1 From Stewart and Newman, '50, p. 33.
TABLE 7
S u m m a r y of significant differences obtained in comparison of Peruvian crania'
-
MM-RL MM-SD RGSD MM-P RL-P MM-C MM-MC RGMC
~
Measurement .~R G C _ __
or index M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F M F
~-
Head length mm MM MM mm MM MM MM MM MM
Head breadth SD SD SD MC MC MC
Head height P P C C MC mc MC
Minimum frontal MM MM
Total facial br. MC
Upper facial h t . SD SD SD sd mc
Nasal height SD sd SD c c c c mc
Nasal breadth P c c mc MC
Orbital height P C

Orbital breadth mm MM mm RL RL MC
Nasion-basion MM mm rl P mc MC
Basion-prosthion MM rl P MC MC
- - MC MC
Ext. maxillary 1.
Ext. maxillary br. mm SD P - - MC

Cranial index RL rl SD SD P c c MC MC MC MC
Length-height RL SD P P P c c C MC MC MC
Breadth-height MM rl P P P C C
Mean height P P P c c C MC MC MC
Upper facial sd sd rl
Orbital index P P P P c c c c
Nasal index
Maxillo-alveolar SD P P - - MC
Cranial module mm MC
Total differences 3 2 11 9 6 3 8 6 6 9 9 6 3 9 6 10 5 12
Both sexes dif. 1 7 1 5 3 6 3 6 3
Percentage both
sexes different 4.3 30.4 4.3 21.7 13.0 30.0 15.0 26.1 13.0
1 Upper case: 5% level; lower case: 10% level.
P R E - C O L U M B I A N CRANIA FROM P E R U 217

bital height non-perpendicularly to the cipally a reflection of time. The specula-


breadth, and perhaps did not measure the tions that can be derived from this observa-
transverse arc through bregma. For these tion are discussed below. Secondly, the
reasons, the Cajamarca samples should only really close metric relationships be-
show fewer sheerly technical differences tween samples are between Maqui-Maquis
with the San Damian and Miscellaneous and Rumi-Lanchi, and Rumi-Lanchi and
Chicama samples than with those from San Damian. In both comparisons there
Paucarcancha and Calca. is only one significant difference con-
In terms of their location, the Paucar- sistent i n both sexes, so the level of metric
cancha and Calca samples are from the relationship is the same. All other pairs
South Sierra, over 700 air miles south of of comparisons show higher percentages
Cajamarca. The San Damian sample is of significant differences.
from the area of the Sierra just southeast
of Lima, less than 500 air miles from DISCUSSION
Cajamarca. The Miscellaneous Chicama HrdliEka (’11, ’14), who pioneered Peru-
sample, on the other hand, is from the vian skeletal studies, distinguished the
coastal valley immediately south of the Coastal brachycephals from the more
Pacasmayo valley whose upper reaches are long-headed crania of the Sierra, and
near San Pablo. Accordingly the Miscel- noted the occasional presence of the lat-
laneous Chicama sample represents the ter i n Coastal cemeteries. Newman (’43,
closest approach to the sort of Coastal p. 39; ’48, p. 18) found that additional
people penetrating the Sierra around data called for the establishing of two
Cajamarca. racial varieties in the Sierra: (1) The
Whereas the Miscellaneous Chicama Central Intermontane, represented by the
sample probably includes skulls referrable Paucarcancha sample and typified as
to Regional Developmental to Expansion- “. . . dolicho - low mesocephalic , . ., high-
ist times, the Calca, San Damian, and less vaulted, medium-short faces, medium-
certainly the Paucarcancha samples are broad nasal apertures, very high orbits.
“late” and therefore Expansionist. Most characteristic is a n oval vault con-
Tables 5 and 6 list the mean measure- tour, a low pinched occiput, flat temporals,
ments and indices of Maqui-Maquis, Rumi- low frontal, and rather low nasal root.”
Lanchi, and the four samples used here ( 2 ) The Western Sierra, represented by
for comparison. Table 7 summarizes the the San Damian sample, and typically
mean differences between these samples, “. . . mesocephalic . . ., medium-vaulted,
that are significant at the 5 and 10% medium face, medium nasal aperture,
levels. A percentile ranking of the signifi- barely high orbits. Most characteristic is
cant differences consistent for both sexes the low pinched occiput, without the ovoid
provides the basis for two principal ob- vault contour, flat temporals, and scapho-
servations : cephaly of the Paucarcancha group.”
Rumi-Lanchi - Maqui-Maquis 4.3 Speaking of the Coastal populations alone,
Rumi-Lanchi - San Damian 4.3 Newman (’47, p. 31) suggests “. . . that
Rumi-Lanchi - Paucarcancha 13.0 in the earlier periods, the differences be-
Rumi-Lanchi - Chicama 13.0
Rumi-Lanchi - Calca 15.0 tween cranial series are greater, but they
Maqui-Maquis - Paucarcancha 21.7 become largely leveled in the Late Period
Maqui-Maquis - Chicama 26.1 due to increased intermingling of people
Maqui-Maquis - Calca 30.0 from different valleys.” He did not, how-
Maqui-Maquis - San Damian 30.4 ever, have the advantage of appraising two
First and most important, the earlier cranial samples of different time periods
Maqui-Maquis sample shows a higher level from the same locality, so he could not be
of differences vis-a-vis the four compara- sure whether the differences were reflec-
tive series than does the Rumi-Lanchi tions principally of space or of time.
sample. Since most of the skulls in the With the introduction of the Cajamarca
four comparative samples are probably late samples, changes over time within an ap-
and referable therefore to the Expansionist parent population continuity are closer to
horizon, these metric differences are prin- being demonstrated. The principal altera-
218 M A R Y F R A N C E S ERICKSEN

tion is toward brachycephaly, but with the foreheads of medium height, and only
close correspondence in other metric and slight facial prognathism.
morphological features as well as the In the same way the Paucarcancha sam-
archeological evidence and the geographic ple may represent the South Sierra popu-
proximity, it is reasonable to assume a lations before extensive shiftings of people.
population continuity. The brachycephali- If this is the case, then the earlier popula-
zation can be attributed either to in- tions of both North and South Sierra were
creased gene flow from the Coast in late strongly dolichocranic, but while medium
time or to a n in situ microevolutionary skull vaults and medium orbital heights
trend if it had time to operate. characterized those in the north, high
In fitting the Cajamarca samples into vaults and orbits were more typical in the
Newman's ('43) Central Intermontane south. The origin of dolichocrany in the
and Western Sierra varieties, it is clear Andes is quite obscure. Newman ('43,
from table 7 that there are appreciable p. 40; '48, p. 18) has suggested that both
differences. Although the Cajamarca sam- longheadedness and low cranial vaults
ples are small, the requirement of differ- may have had a n Amazonian origin, al-
ences consistent to both sexes greatly re- though there is little real evidence one way
duces the chance of sampling errors. If, or the other. At least the low vaults in the
then, the Calca sample is added to New- San Damian sample that impressed New-
man's Central Intermontane variety and man as so unusual for the Sierra are ac-
the Cajamarca samples are considered, tually more wide-spread, e.g., at Maqui-
they tend to blur any real sharpness of Maquis.
distinction between Newman's two Sierra The final part of this hypothesis is based
varieties. Although the Calca and Paucar- upon the percentile rankings on p. 11,
cancha samples share the distinctive Cen- where of the two Cajamarca samples the
tral Intermontane features such as high
later one from Rumi-Lanchi shows closer
vaults, high orbits, and broader faces,
metric correspondence to those from else-
Calca shows greater resemblances in other
traits to the Western Sierra variety repre- where on the Coast and in the Sierra. This
sented by San Damian. If the suggestion strongly suggests that the Late or Expan-
that the Paucarcancha sample is pre-Inca sionist Period leveling of regional differ-
(Newman, '43, p. 23) were more secure, ences applied by Newman ('47, p. 31) to
the differences with Calca which are the the Central Coast also took place in the
points of resemblance with San Damian North Sierra. If so, the Rumi-Lanchi and
could be attributed to time. A comparable Calca samples may represent the rather
change through time is seen i n the Caja- more cosmopolitan and less regionally dif-
marca samples, where Maqui-Maquis is ferentiated Sierra populations arising from
clearly set off from the other Sierra vari- the more extended movements and con-
eties but Rumi-Lanchi shows much less tacts of later times.
differentiation from both Coast and Sierra If the principal factor involved in this
samples. leveling process were Coastal admixture,
The Maqui-Maquis sample, then, may be it could account for the shortening of the
reasonably representative of the North Rumi-Lanchi skull into mesocrany, and
Sierra populations before the time of ex- the greater relative vault height of the
tensive communication between regional males in that sample. However, such a n
groups. If so, in terms of their central explanation calls for two assumptions:
tendencies, these populations were dolicho- that the Coastal peoples were frankly
cranic with low pinched occiputs, flattened brachycephalic in their undeformed state,
lambdoid and temporal regions, ellipsoid and that large numbers of them interbred
vaults of only medium height with strong with the Sierra peoples. Strong brachy-
sagittal elevation, medium-broad faces and cephaly as a consistent trait of the Coast
nasal apertures, and medium to medium- cannot be demonstrated (Newman, '61),
high orbits. Characteristically they would and it is problematic whether Coast-Sierra
have concavo-convex nasal profiles with interbreeding was of sufficient volume to
little or no depression of the nasal root, raise the mean cephalic index three to
PRE-COLUMBIAN CRANIA FROM P E R U 21 9

four index units in the Sierra. Possibly the study of pre-Expansionist skeletal re-
the interpretation of brachycephalization mains from that part of the Central Sierra.
a s a n evolutionary process, used by Wei-
denreich ('45) in the Old World and New- CONCLUSIONS
m a n ('61) in the Americas, is a more Crania from the North Sierra of Peru
satisfactory one for explaining the major recovered from sites of known archeolog-
part of these changes through time in the ical provenience are quite rare. Moreover
Peruvian cranial sequences. the accumulation of more of these in the
The leveling process i n late times need future is quite uncertain. Speculations
not have wiped out all local differences. may not be amiss, therefore, on the sig-
For example, Newman ('43, p. 34) noted nificance of the two small samples total-
that " . . . the Miscellaneous Chicama ling 30 skulls that form the basis of the
series have a heavy scattering of relatively present paper.
narrow palates . . ." The lack of precise The earlier sample with Regional-Devel-
documentation for the Chicama sample opmental (Cajamarca 1-11) ceramic asso-
precludes pin-pointing these narrow pal- ciations and the large series from Paucar-
ates by time and by site. A tendency cancha in the South Sierra may well
toward narrowing of the palate, however, represent regional variants of the basic
is apparent in the Rumi-Lanchi males. dolichocranic Sierra populations before the
More North Coast samples would be re- time of intensified contact between Peru-
quired to demonstrate that this is a re- vian cultures and peoples. The principal
gional trend in Expansionist times, but it differences between these two variants
remains a distinct possibility. seem to lie in their vault and orbital
Finally, the close metric correspondence heights, which are medium in the North
of the Rumi-Lanchi to the San Damian and high i n the South. Comparison of the
sample is difficult to explain. One possi- Regional - Developmental cranial sample
bility is a sort of morphological conver- with an Expansionist horizon sample with
gence due to Coastal admixture in both associated pottery of Cajamarca IV or
the Cajamarca and Huarochiri areas, al- later, suggests a population continuity,
though Newman ('43, p. 35) did not think with increasing brachcrany the only sig-
that the San Damian variety was the re- nificant difference in both sexes. Possibly
sult of Coastal admixture with people like the same phenomenon of continuity with
those at Paucarcancha. The basis for his brachycephalization is represented in the
view was the low variability of the San Paucarcancha and Calca cranial samples
Damian sample and its possession of sev- from the South Sierra.
eral traits distinct from the Coast skulls. The regional variations and the changes
Yet Hrdlitka ('14, pp. 12 - 1 3 ) noted through time apparent in these Sierra sam-
the presence of distinctly different long- ples tend to blur the distinctive features
vaulted and a minority of more round- of the Central Intermontane and Western
vaulted skulls, usually from the same Sierra racial varieties perceived by New-
cemeteries, in the Province of Huarochiri. m a n ('43, '48). Yet the later Cajamarca
Moreover, Trevor's ('53) recent analysis sample shows closer metric correspon-
of race mixture studies renders it doubtful dences, consistent for both sexes, to the
that low variability per se is a reliable other Expansionist samples from the Sierra
indication for lack of admixture. Be that and adjacent coast. This apparent level-
as it may, the retention of Sierra traits ing of metric differences in later times is
such as low pinched occiputs in the San precisely what Newman ('47) suggested
Damian sample is paralleled at Rumi- for the Central Coast. Whether due to
Lanchi. Moreover the Rumi-Lanchi skulls increased gene flow along the Coast and
can easily be separated by visual inspec- between Coast and Sierra, or to some other
tion from the usual series of Coastal evolutionary factor, this leveling of pheno-
crania. In any case, proper explanation typic differences in immediately pre-Con-
of the Western Sierra variety seen in the quest Peru is a biological and demographic
San Damian sample can only come from phenomenon of considerable significance.
220 M A R Y F R A N C E S ERICKSEN

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Mejia Xesspe, M. T. 1948 Apuntes biograficos


sobre el Dr. Julio C. Tello. Rev. Mus. Nac.,
Grateful acknowledgment is due the per- Lima, 2: no. 1.
sonnel of the Museo Nacional de Antro- Newman, M. T. 1943 A metric study of unde-
pologia y Antropologia in Lima, especially formed crania from Peru. Am. J. Phys. An-
throp., N.S., 1: no. 1.
its former Director, Rebeca Carri6n 1947 Indian skeletal material from the
Cachot, Julio Espejo N., and Pedro Weiss. central coast of Peru. Papers Peabody Mus.
To Pablo Carrera M., of the Museum staff, Amer. Archeol. and Ethnol., Harvard Univ.,
I am indebted for descriptions of the San 27: no. 1.
1948 A summary of the racial history
Pablo sites. Richard W. Lewis of the U.S. of the Peruvian area. In A reappraisal of Peru-
Geological Survey and Hans Spann, then vian archeology, ed. W. C. Bennett, pp. 16-19,
of the Instituto Geol6gico del Peru, gave Mem. SOC.Amer. Archeol., 13: no. 4, part 2.
generously of their time and patience in 1961 Evolutionary changes in body size
and head form in American Indians (in press).
photographing the crania. Statistical meth- Pezo Benavente, Juvenal 1946 Notas para la
ods used were suggested by the Statistical antropologia del Cuzco. Rev. SOC.Arqueologica
Consulting Bureau of Columbia University, Univ. Nac. Cuzco, no. 3.
whose help was greatly appreciated. My Reichlen, Henri and Paule 1949 Recherches
archeologiques dans les Andes de Cajamarca.
greatest debt is to Marshall T. Newman Journ. SOC.Americanistes, N.S., 38: Paris.
of the Smithsonian Institution, whose ad- Stewart, T. D. 1943 Skeletal remains with cul-
vice and revision of the manuscript were tural associations from Chicama, Moche, and
invaluable. Viru Valleys, Peru. Proc. U. S . Nat. Mus.,
93: no. 3160.
LITERATURE CITED Stewart, T. D., and M. T. Newman 1950 An-
thropometry of South American Indian skeletal
HrdliEka, Ales 1911 Some results of recent an- remains. I n Handbook of South American In-
thropological exploration in Peru. Smithsonian dians, ed. J. H. Steward, Bur. Am. Ethnology
Misc. Coll., 56: no. 16, publ. 2005. Bull., 143, 6: pp. 19-42.
1914 Anthropological work in Peru i n Trevor, J. C. 1953 Race crossing in man. The
1913, with notes on the pathology of the an- -
analvsis of metrical characters. Eugenics Lab.
cient Peruvians. Ibid., 61: no. 18, publ. 2246. Mem. no. 36.
1939 Practical Anthropometry. Wistar Walker, H. M., and Joseph Lev 1953 Statis-
Inst., Phila. tical inference. Henry Holt and Co., New York.
MacCurdy, G . G . 1923 Human skeletal remains Weidenreich, F. 1945 The brachycephalization
from the highlands of Peru. Am. J. Phys. of recent mankind. Southwest J. Anthrop., 1 :
Anthrop., 6: no. 3. no. 1, pp. 45-98.
PRE-COLUMBIAN CRANIA FROM PERU PLATE 1
Mary Frances Ericksen

a b

C d

a - b. Anterior a n d left lateral views of male cranium from Maqui-Maquis.


c - d. Anterior and left lateral views of female calavarium from Maqui-Maquis.

221
PRE-COLUMBIAN CRANIA FROM PERU PLATE 2
Mary Frances Ericksen

a b

C d
a - b. Anterior and left lateral views of male cranium from Rumi-Lanchi. Note shortening
in anterior view, due to faulty positioning of mandible.
c - d. Anterior and left IateraI views of female calavarium from Rumi-Lanchi.

222

You might also like