Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 14 views

    Frekuensi Kak Mika

    Uploaded by

    Rhoy Lase
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing characteristics of 30 respondents. It shows that: - 56.7% of respondents were female, 43.3% were male. - 56.7% had education up to junior high school, 43.3% had education up to senior high/university. - 56.7% worked, 43.3% were students. - 60% had low income (<Rp 1 million), 40% had high income (>Rp 1 million). - 83.3% had poor nutrition status, 16.7% had good nutrition status. - 60% had low knowledge, 40% had sufficient knowledge. Chi-square tests were performed to examine relationships between variables but

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Frekuensi Kak Mika

    Uploaded by

    Rhoy Lase
    14 views5 pages
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing characteristics of 30 respondents. It shows that: - 56.7% of respondents were female, 43.3% were male. - 56.7% had education up to junior high school, 43.3% had education up to senior high/university. - 56.7% worked, 43.3% were students. - 60% had low income (<Rp 1 million), 40% had high income (>Rp 1 million). - 83.3% had poor nutrition status, 16.7% had good nutrition status. - 60% had low knowledge, 40% had sufficient knowledge. Chi-square tests were performed to examine relationships between variables but

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    frekuensi kak mika

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing characteristics of 30 respondents. It shows that: - 56.7% of respondents were female, 43.3% were male. - 56.7% had education up to junior high school, 43.3% had education up to senior high/university. - 56.7% worked, 43.3% were students. - 60% had low income (<Rp 1 million), 40% had high income (>Rp 1 million). - 83.3% had poor nutrition status, 16.7% had good nutrition status. - 60% had low knowledge, 40% had sufficient knowledge. Chi-square tests were performed to examine relationships between variables but

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    14 views5 pages

    Frekuensi Kak Mika

    Uploaded by

    Rhoy Lase
    The document contains frequency tables analyzing characteristics of 30 respondents. It shows that: - 56.7% of respondents were female, 43.3% were male. - 56.7% had education up to junior high school, 43.3% had education up to senior high/university. - 56.7% worked, 43.3% were students. - 60% had low income (<Rp 1 million), 40% had high income (>Rp 1 million). - 83.3% had poor nutrition status, 16.7% had good nutrition status. - 60% had low knowledge, 40% had sufficient knowledge. Chi-square tests were performed to examine relationships between variables but

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 5

    Frekuensi Data

    JenisKelamin
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Laki-laki 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
    Perempuan 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Pendidikan
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid SMA-PT 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
    SD-SMP 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Pekerjaan
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid IRT 13 43.3 43.3 43.3
    BEKERJA 17 56.7 56.7 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Pendapatan
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Tinggi>1.000.000 12 40.0 40.0 40.0
    Rendah<1.000.000 18 60.0 60.0 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Status Gizi
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid GiziBaik 5 16.7 16.7 16.7
    GiziKurang 25 83.3 83.3 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0
    Pengetahuan
    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
    Valid Cukup 12 40.0 40.0 40.0
    Kurang 18 60.0 60.0 100.0
    Total 30 100.0 100.0

    Uji SPSS Chi square

    Case Processing Summary


    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Pendidikan * Status Gizi 30 100.0% 0 0.0% 30 100.0%

    Pendidikan * Status GiziCrosstabulation


    Status Gizi
    GiziBaik GiziKurang Total
    Pendidikan SMA-PT Count 6 7 13
    % within Pendidikan 46.2% 53.8% 100.0%
    SD-SMP Count 7 10 17
    % within Pendidikan 41.2% 58.8% 100.0%
    Total Count 13 17 30
    % within Pendidikan 43.3% 56.7% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymptotic
    Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square .074 a
    1 .785
    Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000
    Likelihood Ratio .074 1 .785
    Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .538
    Linear-by-Linear Association .072 1 .789
    N of Valid Cases 30
    a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.63.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
    Case Processing Summary
    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Pekerjaan * Status Gizi 30 100.0% 0 0.0% 30 100.0%

    Pekerjaan * Status GiziCrosstabulation


    Status Gizi
    GiziBaik GiziKurang Total
    Pekerjaan IRT Count 5 8 13
    % within Pekerjaan 38.5% 61.5% 100.0%
    BEKERJA Count 8 9 17
    % within Pekerjaan 47.1% 52.9% 100.0%
    Total Count 13 17 30
    % within Pekerjaan 43.3% 56.7% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymptotic
    Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square .222 a
    1 .638
    Continuity Correction b
    .010 1 .921
    Likelihood Ratio .223 1 .637
    Fisher's Exact Test .721 .462
    Linear-by-Linear Association .214 1 .643
    N of Valid Cases 30
    a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.63.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
    Case Processing Summary
    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Pendapatan * Status Gizi 30 85.7% 5 14.3% 35 100.0%

    Pendapatan * Status GiziCrosstabulation


    Status Gizi
    GiziBaik GiziKurang Total
    Pendapatan Tinggi>1.000.000 Count 5 7 12
    % within Pendapatan 41.7% 58.3% 100.0%
    Rendah<1.000.000 Count 8 10 18
    % within Pendapatan 44.4% 55.6% 100.0%
    Total Count 13 17 30
    % within Pendapatan 43.3% 56.7% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymptotic
    Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square .023 a
    1 .880
    Continuity Correction b
    .000 1 1.000
    Likelihood Ratio .023 1 .880
    Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .590
    Linear-by-Linear Association .022 1 .882
    N of Valid Cases 30
    a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.20.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
    Case Processing Summary
    Cases
    Valid Missing Total
    N Percent N Percent N Percent
    Pengetahuan * Status Gizi 30 100.0% 0 0.0% 30 100.0%

    Pengetahuan * Status GiziCrosstabulation


    Status Gizi
    GiziBaik GiziKurang Total
    Pengetahuan Cukup Count 6 6 12
    % within Pengetahuan 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
    Kurang Count 7 11 18
    % within Pengetahuan 38.9% 61.1% 100.0%
    Total Count 13 17 30
    % within Pengetahuan 43.3% 56.7% 100.0%

    Chi-Square Tests
    Asymptotic
    Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
    Value df sided) sided) sided)
    Pearson Chi-Square .362 a
    1 .547
    Continuity Correction b
    .051 1 .821
    Likelihood Ratio .361 1 .548
    Fisher's Exact Test .711 .410
    Linear-by-Linear Association .350 1 .554
    N of Valid Cases 30
    a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.20.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    You might also like