High Court of Judicature For Rajasthan at Jodhpur: (2023/RJJD/009148)

[2023/RJJD/009148]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1128/2023
Mahendra Meena S/o Shri Chiman Singh Meena, Aged About 32

Years, R/o Ward No. 4 Vir Durga Das Nagar Marwar Junction,
District Pali, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary
Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
2. Director, Secondary Education Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Through Its
Chairman Premises Of State Agriculture Management
Institute Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Connected With
Manju Gurjar D/o Rameshwar Gurjar, Aged About 22 Years,
Village Ralayta, Post Hukumpura, Tehsil Phooliya Kalan, District
Bhilwara.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director Secondary
Education Department, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.).
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary
Having Its Office At State Institute On Agriculture
Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.).
----Respondents
Sharmila Kumari W/o Shri Daulat Ram Saran, Aged About 31
Years, Resident Of 17 Jaat Ka Baas, Dalman, Sardarshahar,
District - Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

[2023/RJJD/009148] (2 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection

Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management
Premise, Durgapura, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary.
----Respondents
Madan Lal S/o Naurang Lal, Aged About 32 Years, Ward No. 5,
Harijan Mohalla, Dhadhela, Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director Secondary
Education, Bikaner (Raj.).
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Krishi Prabandh
Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur Through Its
Secretary.
----Respondents
1. Mahaveer Prasad S/o Shri Rai Singh, Aged About 30
Years, R/o Chack 4, B.g.m., Bhagu Khajuwala Bikaner.
2. Pushpa D/o Rameshwar Lal Jat, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Benisar, Bikaner
3. Begraj S/o Shri Bhola Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Ward No. 07/08 Dpn Hanumangarh, Bharwana
4. Ishwar Prajapat S/o Bhagga Ram, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o Kumharoka Bas Atapara,pali
5. Kamlesh Jat S/o Balu Ram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Naya Udaipur Road Kapasan, Chithorgarh
6. Lakhvinder Singh S/o Prem Singh, Aged About 27 Years,
R/o 12 Knd Rawla, Shri Ganganagar
7. Magraj Bhadu S/o Chutra Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Bhaduonkatalanetrad, Barmer
8. Kesha Ram S/o Gumnaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o
Vill. Kanod, Barmer
9. Shyamlal Acharya S/o Babulal Acharrya, Aged About 48
Years, R/o Vpobhadsora Th. Bhadesar, Chhitorgarh
10. Suman Jnagu D/o Pema Ram Jangu, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Dhakikidhanidasanakallanakoda, Nagaur
11. Manju Swami D/o Hari Ram Swami, Aged About 35 Years,

[2023/RJJD/009148] (3 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
R/o Vpo Kishorpura, Ajeetgarh, Shri Madhopur

12. Manju Bala D/o Satbir Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o
Dhokhaharya Tehsil Chdadri, Bhiwanihariyana
13. Sudhir Kumar S/o Sarwan Kumar, Aged About 35 Years,
R/o 2 Tk Ward No. 06 Disst. Shri Ganganagar
14. Shravan Ram S/o Hanuman Ram, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o Ward No. 11 Khokhrana, Bikaner
15. Sachin Choudhary S/o Sukhveer Singh, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Mahapalwasteh. Sureajgarh, Jhunjhunu
16. Sushil Kumar S/o Prahalad Ram Puniya, Aged About 28
Years, R/o Kesardesarjatan, Bikaner
17. Partap Singh Sisodia S/o Megh Singh, Aged About 31
Years, R/o Veilavadi Jawad, Tehsarada, Udaipur
18. Savitri Jat D/o Ram Narayan Jat, Aged About 21 Years,
R/o Shiv Colony Dudu Road Malpurra,tonk
19. Vikas Kumar S/o Madan Lal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o 12
Knd, Shri Ganganagar
20. Prahlad Kumawat S/o Laxmanlalkumawat, Aged About 32
Years, R/o Puraniparsoli Dist. Bhilwara
21. Sanju Kumawat D/o Mohan Lalkumawat, Aged About 29
Years, R/o Puraniparsoli Dist. Bhilwara
22. Subham Suthar S/o Shiv Sankar, Aged About 21 Years,
R/o Bothragaliudairamsar, Bikaner
23. Monika Sahu D/o Kanhaiyalalsahu, Aged About 26 Years,
R/o Satynarayan Marg Chhotibhrampuri Udaipur
24. Anita Kumari D/o Ram Dhankaswan, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Ward No 05 Ramsar, Bikaner
25. Bal Ram Singh Yadav S/o Rampal Singh Yadav, Aged
About 36 Years, R/o Kasimpur Pakri Alambag Lacknow,
Utar Pradesh
26. Gourav Suwalka S/o Gopal Suwalka, Aged About 26
Years, R/o 01 R.k. Colony, Bhilwara
27. Tarsem Singh S/o Ram Kala, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Near New Bus Stand Kaithal, Hariyana
28. Ram Niwas Kaswan S/o Anna Ram Kaswan, Aged About
29 Years, R/o Kesardesarjatan, Bikaner
29. Om Prakash S/o Gopal Dan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o

[2023/RJJD/009148] (4 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
Laxmangarh, Sikar
30. Ravi Sharma S/o Vinod Sharma, Aged About 32 Years,
R/o Beeslam, Surtpura, Rajgarh, Churu
31. Rakesh S/o Sugna Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jatoka
Bas Bedawari Kalan, Nagaur
32. Sarita Choudhary D/o Pukhraj, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
Sohanpura, Barna, Nagaur
33. Saurabh Singh Jat S/o Gopal Singh, Aged About 28 Years,
R/o Kherihewalkhedihewalhindoun,
34. Kalwant Swami S/o Shri Devi Lal Swami, Aged About 32
Years, R/o 15Z, Shri Ganga Nagar.
35. Nirma Rinwa D/o Shri Daman, Aged About 29 Years, R/o
Village Chawatakhurd, Nagaur.
36. Onkar Mal Siyag S/o Shri Bhanwarlalsiyag, Aged About 26
Years, R/o Ward No.3, Maghwalon Ki Basit, Bassi, District
Bikaner.
37. Dinesh Brahman S/o Sukhdev, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
143 Jajroka Bas Khakharakinagaur.
38. Rachana D/o Rampratap, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward
No. 03, 09 Md, Munda, District Hanumangarh.
39. Vinod Kumar S/o Rajender Kumar, Aged About 30 Years,
R/o Ward No.11 5 Pbn Pilibangahanumangarh.
40. Vikram S/o Mohan Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward
No.8, Mahiyanwali, District Sri Ganganagar.
41. Suresh Bhakar S/o Jagdish Ram, Aged About 29 Years,
R/o Near Malibhawan, Didwana Road, Nagaur.
42. Soda Ram S/o Surata Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o
Chitraberapholodi Jodhpur
43. Rajnish Kumar S/o Liladhar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o
Vpo Bhojasar, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of
Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
State Institute Of Agriculture Management Premises,

[2023/RJJD/009148] (5 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents
1. Mahendra Kumar S/o Shri Nemi Chand, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Bera, Badiya Ke Samna, Sandiya, Tehsil - Sojat
City, District - Pali, Rajasthan.
2. Rajaram Yadav S/o Shri Badri Narayan Yadav, Aged About
24 Years, R/o Vpo- Bhojyara, Tehsil - Chaksu, District -
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
1. Narayan Singh S/o Shri Lal Singh, Aged About 38 Years,
R/o Village Ishru, Tehsil Bapini, District Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
2. Padam Singh Rathore S/o Shri Ugam Singh Rathore, Aged
About 42 Years, R/o Vpo Lorta Haridasota, Tehsil Balesar,
District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
3. Sharwan Kumar S/o Shri Parhlad Ram, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Village Manewara, Post Champasar, Tehsil
Ghanityali, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
4. Sahi Ram Bishnoi S/o Shri Bhopala Ram, Aged About 42
Years, R/o Village Nokhara Charnan, Post Aau, Tehsil
Phalodi, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
5. Bhanwar Lal S/o Shri Pancha Ram, Aged About 40 Years,
R/o Village Kelansar, Tehsil Bap, District Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
6. Gopi Ram S/o Shri Foola Ram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o
Village Jaisla, Tehsil Bap, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

[2023/RJJD/009148] (6 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
7. Sharwan Kumar Ranwa S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh, Aged

About 38 Years, R/o Vpo Fatehpura, Tehsil Dhod, District
Sikar, Rajasthan.
8. Joga Ram S/o Shri Banna Ram, Aged About 41 Years, R/o
Vpo Chuntisara, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
9. Ravindra Singh Rathore S/o Shri Braham Singh Rathore,
Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Sawaipura, Post
Bhagwanpura, Tehsil Pisangan, District Ajmer, Rajasthan.
10. Shree Ram Bishnoi S/o Shri Jora Ram, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Village Nokhara Godara, Tehsil Phalodi, District
Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
11. Jitendra Singh S/o Shri Karan Singh, Aged About 38
Years, R/o Vpo Danwara, Tehsil Baori, District Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
12. Kesha Ram S/o Shri Gumna Ram, Aged About 40 Years,
Vpo Kanod, Tehsil Gira, District Barmer, Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Urja Ram Siyag S/o Ramu Ram, Aged About 46 Years, 185, Ward
No. 03, Bhani Bass Basi, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Chairman
Premises Of State Agriculture Management Institute

[2023/RJJD/009148] (7 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

----Respondents
1. Naveen S/o Shri Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 20 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 10, Vpo Nukera, Tehsil Sangaria,
District Hanumangarh, (Raj.).
2. Mohit S/o Shri Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 22 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 01, Vpo Nukera, Tehsil Sangaria,
District Hanumangarh, (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Through Its
Chairman.
3. The Rajasthan Employees Selection Board, Jaipur,
Through Its Secretary.
4. Director, Secondary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner.
----Respondents
Mrs. Karishma Patidar W/o Krishan Prasad Patidar, Aged About
28 Years, R/o Village Semaliya Ghata, Tehsil Galiyakot, District
Dungarpur, Rajasthan .
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
1. Ajay Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Nihal Singh Yadav, Aged
About 39 Years, R/o Village - Jodhpura, Post Office -

[2023/RJJD/009148] (8 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
Mohanpura, Tehsil - Kotputli, District - Jaipur, Rajasthan.

Presently Residing At C/o Deep Singh Rathore S/o Late
Shri Amer Singh Rathore R/o Plot No. 62 B Baldev Nagar,
Near Nagar Nigam Jodhpur, District - Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Sandeep S/o Shri Chet Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o
Village - Untoli, Post - Kohrana, Tehsil - Behror, District -
Alwar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Pooja Dadheech W/o Anurag Dadheech, Aged About 41 Years,
12-D, Bapu Nagar, Senthi, Vtc, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan, 312001
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat,
Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Through Its Secretary,
Having Office At State Institute Of Agriculture
Management Premises, Tonk Rd, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj
Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302018
----Respondents
Gurpreet Singh S/o Shri Sukhdev Singh, Aged About 36 Years,
Resident Of Ward No. 5, Mukund Singh Up Sarpanch Wali Gali,
Haripura, 2Stp, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Elementary

[2023/RJJD/009148] (9 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

2. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
Board, Durgapura, Jaipur Through Its Chairman.
----Respondents
Manju W/o Rajeev Saharan, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of
Jaitsisar, Sardarshahar, District - Churu.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary,
Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
Board, State Institute Of Agriculture Management
Premise, Durgapura, Jaipur, Through Its Secretary.
----Respondents
Vijay Singh S/o Shri Harish Chandra, Aged About 36 Years,
Resident Of Vpo Phephana, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Elementary
Board, Durgapura, Jodhpur Through Its Chairman.
----Respondents
Om Prakash S/o Shri Rawal Ram, Aged About 28 Years, Resident
Of Dayasagar Khara, Tehsil Phalodi, District Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,
Education Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

[2023/RJJD/009148] (10 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
2. The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of

Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur
Through Its Secretary.
3. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner.
----Respondents
1. Sunil Menaria S/o Shri Radheshyam Menaria, Aged About
23 Years, 9/1 Agaravas Bedwas, Tehsil Girwa, District
Udaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Nikhil Purbia S/o Shri Prem Chand, Aged About 23 Years,
20, Near Central Jail, Opposite J.c. Boss Hostel, Tekri
Road, Udaipur, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Hirendra Singh Rathore S/o Shri Karan Singh Rathore, Aged
About 33 Years, Sardar Singh Ki Dhani Mansagar Danwara, Tehsil
Bawari, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Rajasthan.
2. Dirctor Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its
----Respondents

[2023/RJJD/009148] (11 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

Yogendra Singh S/o Shri Renwant Singh, Aged About 29 Years,
Vpo Badoda Gaon, Tehsil And District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Ummed Singh S/o Shri Devi Singh, Aged About 38 Years, 7 Sinla
Market, Ajmer Road, Gajsingh Colony, Jodhpur District Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
1. Pukhraj Kala S/o Hari Ram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o
Near Thakhur Ji Ka Mandir Village Basni Khaleel, Post
Gajoo, Tehsil Marwar Mundawa, Dist. Nagaur, Raj.
2. Sunil Inaniyan S/o Om Prakash, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Village Inana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
3. Jaiveer Singh S/o Narpat Singh, Aged About 39 Years,
R/o Village Merwara, Tehsil Degana, Dist. Nagaur,
Rajasthan.
4. Sushila D/o Mohan Ram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village

[2023/RJJD/009148] (12 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
Inana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners
Versus
And Rajasthan.
Institute Durgarpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Mukund Joshi S/o Shri Prabhakar Joshi, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o 115 Neem Ki Gali, Darjiwara, Khanda Falsa, Jodhpur, District
Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
1. Shaitan Singh S/o Aashu Ram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o
Danta Tehsil Sanchore District Jalore.
2. Shrawan Kumar S/o Keshu Ram, Aged About 23 Years,
R/o Sarnau Tehsil Sanchore, District Jalore.
----Petitioners
Versus
Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, State Agriculture
Management Institution Compound, Durgapura, Jaipur.
----Respondent

[2023/RJJD/009148] (13 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

Mahendra Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Madan Lal Yadav, Aged About
33 Years, R/o Village Bhaloji, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur,
Rajasthan. Presently Residing At C/o Deep Singh Rathore S/o
Late Shri Amer Singh Rathore R/o Plot No. 62 B Baldev Nagar,
Near Nagar Nigam Jodhpur, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Kaushal Kishore Vyas S/o Shri Nand Kishore Vyas, Aged About
34 Years, R/o Chand Bawri Mohalla, Ranisar Ghati Old Fort Road,
District - Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Moomal D/o Shri Bheema Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village
Nada, Post Kapuriya, Tehsil Fatehgarh, District Jaisalmer,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus

[2023/RJJD/009148] (14 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Dheeresh Kumar S/o Shri Babu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o
V/p Sankara, Tehsil Pokaran, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
Deepak Bijawat S/o Late Shri Surendra Kumar, Aged About 36
Years, R/o 2-J-14, Opp. Mahesh Park, Pratap Nagar, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Department Of School Education, Secretariat,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. The Chairman, Rajasthan Employees Selection Board,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Employees Selection Board,
Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Board Of Secondary Education Rajasthan, Through Its
Secretary, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
----Respondents

[2023/RJJD/009148] (15 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

Laxmi D/o Shri Kishnaram W/o Shri Ashok, Aged About 30 Years,
Resident Of Karni Colony, Nagaur, (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary To The
Government, Department Of Secondary Education,
Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
3. The Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Rajya
Krishi Prabandh Sansthan Parisar, Durgapura, Jaipur.
----Respondents
Saroj Kunwar Bhati D/o Shri Bhim Singh Bhati, Aged About 24
Years, R/o Vpo Hingwaniya, Tehsil Kapasan, District Chittorgarh,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
And Rajasthan.
----Respondents
1. Deepak S/o Karna Ram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village
Narsar, Tehsil Bhopalgarh, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
2. Chuna Ram S/o Naru Ram, Aged About 22 Years, R/o
Mornawara, Soyla, Dist. Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
And Rajasthan.

[2023/RJJD/009148] (16 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

----Respondents
Gurdeep Mahyach S/o Kedar Mahyach, Aged about 28 years,

R/o Ward No.3, VPO Dhandela, District Hanumangarh,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Elementary
Eduction, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Rajasthan Subordinate & Ministerial Service Selection
Board, Durgapura, Jaipur through its Chairman.
----Respondents

Ganesh Ram S/o Syokn Ram, Aged about 30 years, R/o
House No.278, Puniya Bass, Kapoorisa, District Bikaner,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
Department Of School Education, Secretariat,
Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Through its
Chairman Premises of State Agriculture Management
----Respondents

[2023/RJJD/009148] (17 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]

Ramesh Kumar S/o Shri Ash Ram, Aged about 44 years, R/o
Wad No.13, Village Mehariy, Sherara, Tehsil Bhadra, District
Hanumangarh.
----Petitioner
Versus
Department of Education, Government Of Rajasthan,
Jaipur.
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, State
Agriculture Management Institute Campus,
Durgapura, Jaipur, through its Secretary.
3. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
----Respondents

Ramesh Bishnoi S/o Hansraj Bishnoi, Aged about 25
years, R/o Jivan Natha Ji Ke Bagiche Ke Pas, Bikaner,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, through its
Chairman, State Institute of Agriculture
Management Premises, Shreeji Nagar, Prithviraj
Colony, Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajatshan.
2. State of Rajathan through Director, Secondary
Education Rajasthan, Bikaner.
----Respondents

Birbal Godara S/o Hariram Godara, Aged about 30 years
R/o VPO Barsinghsar, District Bikaner.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through the Principal
Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education,

[2023/RJJD/009148] (18 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

3. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur, Through its
Chairman Premises of State Agriculture
Management Institute Durgapura, Jaipur,
Rajasthan.
---Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia

Mr. Tanwar Singh
Mr. Bhawani Singh Ransi for
Mr. Manas Khatri
Mr. Ashvini Kumar
Mr. Raghu Nandan Sharma Through
VC
Mr. M.L. Deora
Mr. Shubhendu Chouhan for
Mr. K.R. Saharan
Mr. S.K. Shreemali
Mr. Devendra Singh Rathore
Mr. Inderjeet Yadav
Mr. V.D. Vaishnav
Mr. Vikash Choudhary
Mr. Yash Pal Khileree
Mr. Vineet R.Dave
Mr. R.J. Punia
Mr. Karan Parihar
Mr. Vikram Singh
Mr. Anil Bidan Halu
Mr. O.P. Sangwa
Mr. Devendra Singh Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinit Sanadhya
Mr. Vishal Jangid, Dy.G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Order
06/04/2023
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The controversy involved in the present bunch of writ
petitions is similar in nature, therefore, they are being disposed of
by this common order.

[2023/RJJD/009148] (19 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
For brevity, the prayer of S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.19701/2022 “Hirendra Singh Rathore Vs. State of Rajasthan &
Ors.” is taken into consideration which reads as under:
“A. By an appropriate writ order or direction, any

verbal/written order denying the selection and
appointment to the petitioner for the post of PTI in
pursuance of the advertisement 16.06.2022 (Annex-1)
may kindly be quashed and set aside.
B. By an appropriate writ order or direction, result dated
21.10.2022 (Annex-5) and subsequent first and Final
answer key in pursuance of the advertisement
16.06.2022 (Annex-1) may kindly be quashed and set
aside.
C. By an appropriate writ order or direction, the
respondents may kindly be directed to Constitute Expert
Committee and relook in the deleted/out of syllabus/multi
option and question challenged by the petitioner and
award bonus marks/award marks and revise the result in
pursuance of the advertisement 16.06.2022 (Annex-1).
D. By an appropriate writ order or direction, the
respondents may kindly be directed to award Bonus
marks for deleted questions/multi option and also award
marks for correct answer/out of syllabus questions to the
petitioner in pursuance of the advertisement 16.06.2022
(Annex-1) and revise result afresh.
E. By an appropriate writ order or direction, the
respondents may kindly be directed to permit the
petitioner in the further selection process and afford the
appointment to the petitioners on the post of PTI against
their respective category if they stand in merit with all
consequential benefits in pursuance of the advertisement
dated 16.06.2022 (Annex-1).”
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the
petitioners have appeared in the examination conducted for filling
up the posts of Physical Training Instructor (P.T.I.) vide
advertisement dated 16.06.2022. After declaration of the result,
the answer key was published by the respondents, however, on
certain objections being raised, the answer key was referred to
the expert committee and a reviewed answer key was published.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that as per the

[2023/RJJD/009148] (20 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
reviewed and republished answer key, the questions which were
adjudicated to be correct in the first answer key have been found
to be incorrect and the answers to these questions in the question
paper for PTI examination have been changed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submit that as per
the first answer key published by the respondents, if the numbers
obtained by the petitioners are taken into consideration, then they
are selected on the basis of the first answer key. However, on
review being made, those questions to which the petitioners have
answered have not been adjudicated to be correct and therefore,
their names do not find place in the merit list. Learned counsel
for the petitioners submit that the matter requires reconsideration
and an expert commitee may be constituted to re-examine the
infirmities mentioned by them in the writ petitions while
adjudicating the correct answers to the questions. It is prayed by
the petitioners that they will be satisfied, if the contentions raised
in support of their correct answers in writ petition are examined
by the expert body to be appointed by the respondents.
In the aforementioned bunch of writ petitions, there are
number of questions which have been mentioned and according to
the petitioners, the answers to those questions given by them are
correct as per the text books relied upon by them in these writ
petitions and therefore, they submit that they should have been
awarded marks for the same, but the expert committee has not
found those answers to be correct.
On the submissions made by the learned counsel for the
petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents were directed to

[2023/RJJD/009148] (21 of 21) [CW-1128/2023]
complete the instructions as to whether the expert committee
which has examined the objections received on the first answer
key can re-consider and re-examine the matter afresh. Learned
counsel for the respondents on instructions submit that they will
get the contentions/objections of the petitioners re-examined
through the expert committee and pass appropriate order after
their re-examination.
In view of the contentions raised by the learned counsel for
the parties, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of these
writ petitions with a direction to the respondents to reconsider/re-
examine the answers to the objectionable questions challenged in
these writ petition by the expert committee. While examining the
same, the contentions raised in these writ petitions may be
considered as objections. The expert committee shall pass the
appropriate orders with respect to the adjudication made by them
on the objectionable questions raised in the writ petitions. The
said exercise of examination by the expert committee shall be
completed within a period of six weeks from today.
Needless to say, if any change is made in the answers after
the re-examination by the expert committee, as a consequence,
the result shall also be reshuffled by the respondents.
Stay petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

38-44, 46-69, 166 & C-1 to C-4/Vivek/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

High Court of Judicature For Rajasthan at Jodhpur: (2023/RJJD/009148)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

High Court of Judicature For Rajasthan at Jodhpur: (2023/RJJD/009148)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

[2023/RJJD/009148]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

Mahendra Meena S/o Shri Chiman Singh Meena, Aged About 32

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

2. Rajasthan Subordinate And Ministerial Service Selection

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

R/o Vpo Kishorpura, Ajeetgarh, Shri Madhopur

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

7. Sharwan Kumar Ranwa S/o Shri Ramchandra Singh, Aged

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

Durgapura, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

Mohanpura, Tehsil - Kotputli, District - Jaipur, Rajasthan.

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:13 AM)

Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

2. The Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute Of

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14/2023

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

Inana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 503/2023

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

Department Of Secondary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1034/2023

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

2. Director, Secondary Education Bikaner, Rajasthan.

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2638/2023

Gurdeep Mahyach S/o Kedar Mahyach, Aged about 28 years,

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1981/2023

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 299/2023

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1306/2023

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17222/2022

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The controversy involved in the present bunch of writ

petitions is similar in nature, therefore, they are being disposed of

by this common order.

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

For brevity, the prayer of S.B. Civil Writ Petition

No.19701/2022 “Hirendra Singh Rathore Vs. State of Rajasthan &

Ors.” is taken into consideration which reads as under:

“A. By an appropriate writ order or direction, any

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the

petitioners have appeared in the examination conducted for filling

up the posts of Physical Training Instructor (P.T.I.) vide

advertisement dated 16.06.2022. After declaration of the result,

the answer key was published by the respondents, however, on

certain objections being raised, the answer key was referred to

the expert committee and a reviewed answer key was published.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that as per the

(Downloaded on 10/05/2023 at 08:03:14 AM)

reviewed and republished answer key, the questions which were