Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Feline Chronic Gingivostomatitis An Update 1671815182
Feline Chronic Gingivostomatitis An Update 1671815182
PRESSLAB/shutterstock.com
Abstract
Feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS) affects around 0.7% to 12% of the feline population and is a source of
frustration for the affected pet, pet owner, and veterinary team. The exact etiology of the disease continues to evade
the veterinary community, making it difficult to explain to pet owners. Past and present studies are making progress
toward identifying a link to the exact causality of this disease and have opened the door to multiple therapeutic
modalities. Although surgical intervention in conjunction with medical management is still the gold standard, other
options are now available to veterinary professionals. New modalities are discussed alongside current research
detailing the long history of FCGS in cats today.
DENTISTRY
Feline Chronic
Gingivostomatitis:
An Update
Sheena Davis, LVT, VTS (Dentistry), Veterinary Cannabis Counselor
Big Apple LVT Consulting & Education, New York City, New York
F
eline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS) is a Many studies are dedicated to the discovery of the
debilitating inflammatory disease affecting true etiology of FCGS. Unfortunately, the exact
the oral cavity of cats. This disease is cause of FCGS is currently unknown, but
marked by severe to chronic inflammation of the thankfully a decade’s worth of investigation has
gingiva, mucosa, and surrounding tissues that line advanced the knowledge and treatment of this
the oral cavity.1 Chronic gingivostomatitis affects debilitating disease.
approximately 0.7% to 12% of the general cat
population.2-4
ETIOLOGY
There is a great deal of frustration regarding the This complex multifactorial condition does not
diagnosis and treatment of this oral inflammatory have a simple etiologic agent. Several studies have
disease. The frustration is due in part to the high found that FCGS is caused by an exaggerated
frequency of inflammatory diseases in the oral immunologic response to antigenic stimulation.6
cavity of cats and veterinary professionals’ limited The causes of this stimulation can be exaggerated
understanding of their etiology.5 by viral diseases such as feline leukemia virus
(FeLV) infection, feline immunodeficiency virus
(FIV) infection, calicivirus infection, feline
Take-Home Points
infectious peritonitis, herpesvirus infection, and influence on the overall diversity and abundance of
panleukopenia virus infection as well as bacterial specific bacteria in the oral microbiome of cats. The
organisms such as Bartonella henselae.6 cats fed an exclusively dry diet had higher bacterial
diversity than the cats fed a wet-food diet. While
The systemic and local consequences of FCGS are differences between the oral microbiome of the cats fed
suggested by the presence of lymphocytes and plasma these exclusive diets were noted, the relationship
cells in affected oral tissues, with fewer neutrophils, between these differences and gingival health remains
Mott cells, and mast cells.7,8 In humans, a known ratio unclear. Further studies are needed to determine the
of low CD4+ to CD8+ T cells is a marker for immune full extent of the “diet factor” and FCGS.
dysfunction and chronic inflammation. Through this,
we can infer a similar pathologic reaction in cats with As for breed predilection, unfortunately this disease can
FCGS that have an increased CD8+ (cytotoxic) T cell affect any breed, regardless of age or sex.16 Until 2007,
count compared with CD4+ (helper) T cell count. it was believed that breeds such as Abyssinian, Burmese,
These cells have been detected locally as well as Himalayan, Persian, and Siamese were mostly
systemically, supporting the theory of an inflammatory affected.16 In a survey of almost 5000 cats in
response, likely a cell-mediated immune response, to 12 practices over a 12-week period, 34 cases of FCGS
antigenic stimulation probably caused by pathogens were noted, with no breed bias identified.2
such as viruses.9-11 Recent studies focused on the
shedding of calicivirus as an active virus in clinical cases A 2019 study noted a possible link between
of FCGS and found no association of viral shedding environmental stressors and FCGS, revealing a higher
with FeLV, FIV, herpesvirus, and Bartonella.12 incidence in multicat households versus single-cat
households; every additional household cat increased
A 2021 study examined the oral microbiome of cats to the odds of FCGS by more than 70%.17 Cats within
determine whether an imbalance of the oral flora this study were indoor-only; therefore, evidence was
played a potential role in FCGS. In this small pilot missing regarding indoor–outdoor cats within a
study, 14 clinically healthy cats and 14 cats affected by multicat home. Further studies focusing on the
FCGS were tested.13 A sterile swab was used to obtain a interaction between cats in a multicat household, with
sample and tested using next-generation DNA access to the outdoors and possible circulation
sequencing. A high number of fungal species, such as (reinfection) of infectious agents between housemates,
Malassezia restricta, Malassezia arunalokei, Cladosporium must be conducted.
penidielloides, Cladosporium salinae, and Aspergillus
species, were found and detected in the FCGS group;
the fungi Saccharomyces cerevisiae was found solely in CLINICAL SIGNS
the clinically healthy cat group. “Feline chronic gingivostomatitis” is an umbrella term
used to describe the chronic stomatitis and gingivitis
This pilot study was able to identify the distinct syndrome of cats. This disease can be further classified
differences between the oral microbiome of cats that into types 1 and 218:
were clinically healthy versus those affected by FCGS, ● Type 1 FCGS has a better prognosis and is classified
with a potential biomarker identified as Bergeyella by its clinical characteristic alveolar, labial/buccal
zoohelcum.13 Additional studies are needed to improve mucositis/stomatitis.
the understanding of the oral microbiome of cats, but ● Type 2 FCGS is classified by its characteristic
this study supports the idea of a potential imbalance location along the caudal aspect of the oral cavity,
between the flora of the oral cavity of cats and its with or without alveolar and labial/buccal mucositis/
potential role in FCGS. stomatitis.
Additional studies point to a potential link to Cats affected by FCGS can show various clinical signs,
nutritional disorders and a breed predilection.14 A pilot but the most common are halitosis, dysphagia
study examined the oral microbiome of cats and the (difficulty swallowing), pawing at the mouth,
changes of the microbiome based on provided diets.15 reluctance to eat, anorexia, weight loss, growling/
The cats in this pilot study were divided into 2 groups; crying, drooling, blood-tinged saliva, change in
1 was offered a dry diet and the other a wet-food diet. temperament, enlarged lymph nodes, and a lack of
This study discovered that diet indeed had a significant grooming.19,20
Radiographs
Intraoral radiographs are always warranted and should
be obtained on any patient undergoing a dentistry
FIGURE 1. Oral radiology during a dental examination.
procedure (FIGURE 1). The radiographs help determine
Interferon
A group of signaling proteins that can interfere with Carbon Dioxide Laser Therapy
viral replication is known as interferons. Recombinant The use of carbon dioxide (CO2) laser therapy for
feline interferon omega (rFeIFN-ω) was the first FCGS has been met with favorable results when
interferon licensed for use in cats in veterinary combined with quality home care. The energy from the
medicine.29 laser decreases pain while enhancing healing through
protein synthesis, cell proliferation, and migration.
rFeIFN-ω is available in the United States solely Some veterinarians opt to use CO2 laser therapy at the
through the FDA Expanded Access/Compassionate Use time of initial surgical extraction; CO2 therapy may be
Program.12 This medication is imported on a strict helpful in cases of refractory FCGS as well.18
of windup, unblock receptors, and create a synergistic 2. Healey KAE, Dawson S, Burrow R, et al. Prevalence of feline chronic
gingivo-stomatitis in first opinion veterinary practice. J Feline Med
analgesic effect. Surg. 2007;9(5):373-81. doi:10.1016/j.jfms.2007.03.003
3. Winer JN, Arzi B, Verstraete FJM. Therapeutic management of feline
chronic gingivostomatitis: a systematic review of the literature. Front
Another major component to pain management is Vet Sci. 2016;3:54. doi:10.3389/fvets.2016.00054
providing intraoral nerve blocks for these patients 4. Girard N, Servet E, Biourge V, Hennet P. Periodontal health
status in a colony of 109 cats. J Vet Dent. 2009;26(3):147-155.
undergoing a comprehensive oral health and assessment doi:10.1177/089875640902600301
treatment plan. If not contraindicated, 5. Pedersen NC. Inflammatory oral cavity diseases of the cat. Vet Clin
dexmedetomidine can be added (1 µg/kg) to North Am Small Anim Pract. 1992;22(6):1323-1345. doi:10.1016/s0195-
5616(92)50130-9
bupivacaine (0.5% solution up to 5 mg) as a nerve
6. Williams CA, Aller MS. Gingivitis/stomatitis in cats. Vet Clin North 28. Winslow MM, Gallo EM, Neilson JR, Crabtree GR. The calcineurin
Am Small Anim Pract. 1992;22(6):1361-1383. doi:10.1016/s0195- phosphatase complex modulates immunogenic B cell responses.
5616(92)50132-2 Immunity. 2006;24(2):141-152. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.12.013
7. Arzi B, Murphy B, Cox DP, Vapniarsky N, Kass PH, Verstraete FJM. 29. Leal RO, Gil S. The use of recombinant feline interferon omega
Presence and quantification of mast cells in the gingiva of cats with therapy as an immune-modulator in cats naturally infected with feline
tooth resorption, periodontitis and chronic stomatitis. Arch Oral immunodeficiency virus: new perspectives. Vet Sci. 2016;3(4):32.
Biol. 2010;55(2):148-154. doi:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2009.11.004 doi:10.3390/vetsci3040032
8. Rolim VM, Pavarini SP, Campos FS, et al. Clinical, pathological, 30. Hung YP, Yang YP, Wang HC, et al. Bovine lactoferrin and piroxicam as
immunohistochemical and molecular characterization of feline an adjunct treatment for lymphocytic-plasmacytic gingivitis stomatitis
chronic gingivostomatitis. J Feline Med Surg. 2017;19(4):403-409. in cats. Vet J. 2014;202(1):76-82. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.06.006
doi:10.1177/1098612X16628578
31. Turner B. Stem cell therapy for cats. Preventive Vet. September
9. Harley R, Gruffydd-Jones TJ, Day MJ. Immunohistochemical 20,2021. Accessed June 6, 2022. https://www.preventivevet.com/cats/
characterization of oral mucosal lesions in cats with chronic stem-cell-therapy-for-cats
gingivostomatitis. J Comp Pathol. 2011;144(4):239-250. doi:10.1016/j. 32. Polidoro G, Galiazzo G, Giancola F, et al. Expression of cannabinoid
jcpa.2010.09.173 and cannabinoid-related receptors in the oral mucosa of healthy
10. Arzi B, Clark KC, Sundaram A, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of fresh, cats and cats with chronic gingivostomatitis. J Feline Med Surg.
allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells for severe refractory feline 2021;23(8):679-691. doi:10.1177/1098612X20970510
chronic gingivostomatitis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(8):1710-1722. 33. Pavlica M, Kržan M, Nemec A, Kosjek T, Baš A, Seliškar A.
doi:10.1002/sctm.17-0035 Cardiopulmonary effects and pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine
11. Arzi B, Mills-Ko E, Verstraete FJM, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of used as an adjunctive analgesic to regional anesthesia of the oral
fresh, autologous mesenchymal stem cells for severe refractory cavity with levobupivacaine in dogs. Animals (Basel). 2022;12(9):1217.
gingivostomatitis in cats. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5(1):75-86. doi:10.3390/ani12091217
doi:10.5966/sctm.2015-0127 34. Snyder LBC, Snyder CJ, Hetzel S. Effects of buprenorphine added to
12. Greenfield B. Chronic feline gingivostomatitis: proven therapeutic bupivacaine infraorbital nerve blocks on isoflurane minimum alveolar
approaches and new treatment options. Todays Vet Pract. 2017;7(1):26- concentration using a model for acute dental/oral surgical pain in
38. dogs. J Vet Dent. 2016;33(2):90-96. doi:10.1177/0898756416657232
13. Krumbeck JA, Reiter AM, Pohl JC, et al. Characterization of oral 35. Stathopoulou TR, Kouki M, Pypendop BH, Johnston A, Papadimitriou
microbiota in cats: novel insights on the potential role of fungi S, Pelligand L. Evaluation of analgesic effect and absorption of
in feline chronic gingivostomatitis. 2021;10(7):904. doi:10.3390/ buprenorphine after buccal administration in cats with oral disease.
pathogens10070904 J Feline Med Surg. 2018;20(8):704-710. doi:10.1177/1098612X17727234
14. Lyon KF. Gingivostomatitis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract.
2005;35(4):891-911. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2005.02.001
15. Adler CJ, Malik R, Browne GV, Norris JM. Diet may influence the oral
microbiome composition in cats. Microbiome. 2016;4(1):23. doi:10.1186/
s40168-016-0169-y
16. Crawford J, Losey BJ. Feline dentistry. In: Perrone JR, ed. Small Animal
Dental Procedures for Veterinary Technicians and Nurses. 1st ed. Wiley-
Blackwell; 2012:143-160. Sheena Davis
17. Peralta S, Carney PC. Feline chronic gingivostomatitis is more Sheena is the founder and owner of Big Apple LVT
prevalent in shared households and its risk correlates with the Consulting & Education, with more than 16 years
number of cohabiting cats. J Feline Med Surg. 2019;21(12):1165-1171.
doi:10.1177/1098612X18823584 of clinical experience in both specialty and general
18. Oropharyngeal inflammation. In: Bellows J. Feline Dentistry. 2nd ed.
practice. She is a peer-reviewed author, course
Wiley-Blackwell; 2022:253-324. designer for the Veterinary Cannabis Guide Program,
19. Pathology in the pediatric patient. In: Niemiec BA. Small Animal library/media curator for the Veterinary Cannabis
Dental, Oral, & Maxillofacial Disease: A Color Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Society, and frequent guest lecturer for conferences
Press; 2011:124-125. and events. She achieved dentistry VTS and Veterinary
20. Problems with the gingiva. In: Niemiec BA. Small Animal Dental, Oral, Cannabis Counselor certification in 2020.
& Maxillofacial Disease: A Color Handbook. 2nd ed. CRC Press;
2011:176-181.
21. Reiter AM, Johnston N, Anderson JG, Soltero-Rivera MM, Lobprise
HB. Domestic feline oral and dental diseases. In: Lobprise HB, Dodd
JR, eds. Wiggs’s Veterinary Dentistry: Principles and Practice. 2nd ed.
Wiley-Blackwell; 2019:439-461.
22. Jennings MW, Lewis JR, Soltero-Rivera MM, Brown DC, Reiter AM.
Effect of tooth extraction on stomatitis in cats: 95 cases (2000–2013).
JAVMA. 2015;246(6):654-660. doi:10.2460/javma.246.6.654
23. Druet I, Hennet P. Relationship between feline calicivirus load, oral
lesions, and outcome in feline chronic gingivostomatitis (caudal
stomatitis): retrospective study in 104 cats. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:209.
doi:10.3389/fvets.2017.00209
24. Hennet P. Chronic gingivo-stomatitis in cats: long-term follow-up of
30 cases treated by dental extractions. J Vet Dent. 1997;14(1):15-21.
doi:10.1177/08987564970140
25. Lee DB, Verstraete FJM, Arzi B. An update on feline chronic
gingivostomatitis. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract.
2020;50(5):973-982. doi:10.1016/j.cvsm.2020.04.002
26. Robson D. Review of the properties and mechanisms of action of
cyclosporine with an emphasis on dermatological therapy in dogs, cats
and people. Vet Rec. 2003;152(25):768-772. doi:10.1136/vr.152.25.768
27. Matsuda S, Koyasu S. Mechanisms of action of cyclosporine.
Immunopharmacology. 2000;47(2-3):119-125. doi:10.1016/s0162-
3109(00)00192-2