[Type here]

Southern Philippines College, Julio Pacana St, Licuan

Cagayan de Oro City, 9000
EDUC 202 STATISTICAL METHODS IN
EDUCATION
Name: RADHEL FAITH V. TOLO                       
Course/Year: MAED-1
Professor: MARIBEL CLAVERIA, Ph.D              
[Type here]

ACTIVITY NO. 7
Topic: T-Test

Problem no. 1

The following are independent random samples of the IQ’s of teenagers belonging to two different ethnic groups. (30
points)

Group A: 98 104 101 A 96 103 99 95 105 101

Group B: 105 95 103 107 100 B 108 114 107 102
Use the level of significance  = 0.05 to test the claim that teenagers of group A have lower average IQ than
teenagers of Group B. (ONE-TAILED TEST)

NOTE: A = the number of letters of your first name multiplied by 10

B = the number of letters of your family name multiplied by 8

Group A Group B

98 105
104 95
101 103
80 107
96 100
103 64
99 108
95 114
105 107
101 102
SOLUTION:

Group A: Group B:
x1 x1^2 X2 X2^2
98 9604 105 11025
104 10816 95 9025
101 10201 103 10609
80 6400 107 11449
96 9216 100 10000
103 10609 64 4096
99 9801 108 11664
95 9025 114 12996
105 11025 107 11449
101 10201 102 10404
Sum 982 96898 1005 102717
Mean 98.20 100.50

Solving for variance:

Variance 1 = 51.73 Variance 2 = 190.50

[Type here]

t = 0.47

Hypotheses
1. H0 =
There is no truth on the claim that teenagers of group A
have lower average IQ than teenagers of Group B.

2. HA =
There is truth on the claim that teenagers of group A have
lower average IQ than teenagers of Group B.

3.      Test Statistics

: Not Significant; Accept Ho
: Significant; Reject Ho
4.      Rejection Region (at 0.05 level of significance)

Conclusion
:
Since the computed t = 0.47 < tc = 1.734 then the null hypothesis is
ACCEPTED therefore there is no truth on the claim that teenagers of
group A have lower average IQ than teenagers of Group B.

Part B. Conclusion and comprehensive analysis.

Based on the data provided and the results both students from Group A and Group B teenagers are from different
types of ethnic group. Each group of students has an average IQ level because they are all scholars. Thus, both are
studying at the same school. They also both have different IQ level.
[Type here]

ACTIVITY NO. 8
TOPIC: CHI-SQUARE
Problem no. 1
Data from a survey of Southern Philippines College students which assessed how
frequently they exercised.
We used the χ2 goodness-of-fit test to assess whether there was a shift in the distribution of
responses to the exercise question following the implementation of a health promotion campaign
on campus. We specifically considered one sample (all students) and compared the observed
distribution to the distribution of responses the prior year (a historical control). Suppose we now
wish to assess whether there is a relationship between exercise on campus and students' living
arrangements. As part of the same survey, graduates were asked where they lived their senior
year. The response options were dormitory, on-campus apartment, off-campus apartment, and at
home (i.e., commuted to and from the university). The data are shown below.
Living arrangement No Regular Sporadic Regular Total
Exercise Exercise Exercise
Dormitory A 30 28
On-Campus Apartment 74 64 42
Off-Campus Apartment 110 25 15
At Home 39 6 B
Total

Based on the data, is there a relationship between exercise and student's living arrangement? Do
you think where a person lives affect their exercise status? Here we have four independent
comparison groups (living arrangement) and a discrete outcome variable with three response
options. We specifically want to test whether living arrangement and exercise are independent.
(Use α=0.05)

NOTE: A = the number of letters of your first name multiplied by 10

B = the number of letters of your family name multiplied by 8

1. 𝐻 : For each alternative (unemployment, undecided, and inflation), the probabilities are the same
for the three parts of the country.

2. 𝐻 : For at least one alternative, the probabilities are not the same for the three country.
3. Test Statistics:
𝑋2 < 𝑋𝑐2 ∶ ∶ 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝐻𝑜

𝑋2 > 𝑋𝑐2 ∶ ∶ 𝑒𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝐻𝑜

4. Rejection Region: @ 0.01 level of significance

𝑑𝑓 = (𝑟 − 1) (𝑐 − 1) = (3 – 1) (3 – 1) = 4

𝑋2 = 13.277
[Type here]

Since 𝑋2 = 125.0249 exceed 𝑋𝑐2 = 13.277, the null hypothesis is not accepted; the difference between the observed
and expected frequencies may well be due to chance.

sporadic
Living arrangement no exercise regular exercise Total
exercise

dormitory 80 30 28 138
on-campus 74 64 42 180
off-campus 110 25 15 150
at home 39 6 64 109
Total 303 125 149 569

e 0-e (0 - e)^2 (0 - e)^2/e

80 73.49 6.51 42.42 0.5773

74 95.85 -21.85 477.53 4.9819
110 79.88 30.12 907.40 11.3599
39 53.78 -14.78 218.56 4.0637
30 30.32 -0.32 0.10 0.0033
64 39.54 24.46 598.14 15.1263
25 32.95 -7.95 63.24 1.9192
6 22.19 -16.19 262.05 11.8105
28 34.20 -6.20 38.40 1.1229
42 44.60 -2.60 6.78 0.1521
15 37.17 -22.17 491.53 13.2237
64 25.03 38.97 1518.81 60.6840

chi-square 125.0249

Part B: Describe the result and make a comprehensive analysis and implications. Make assumptions if deemed
necessary. (Note: pls make your own. Do not copy the work of your classmates or else both of you will never
get a credit.)

Based on the data gathered showed that there is a relationship between exercise and student’s living
arrangement. The place where they live basically affect their exercise status. It has shown on the data that the
students living on the place which influences their daily living lifestyle such as exercise it will increasingly
affect the activities that you will be doing. When someone lives in a place where daily routine or exercise has
never a chance to prosper there will be a greater chances of low activity to be done. Therefore, the influence of
the people in a ceratin place greatly influence the daily activities.
[Type here]

ACTIVITY 9
TOPIC: ONE-WAY ANOVA

Problem:

The following data shown is the result of an engineering experiment on the moisture absorption of sand and gravel in
concrete mixtures. Test a hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance whether there are significant differences of the
moisture absorption considering the different type of aggregates. (30 points)

Absorption of Moisture in Concrete Aggregates

Aggregate 1 2 3 4 5
551 595 639 417 563
457 A 615 449 631
450 508 511 517 522
731 583 573 438 613
499 633 648 B 656
632 517 677 555 679

NOTE: A = the number of letters of your first name multiplied by 100

B = the number of letters of your family name multiplied by 100

SOLUTION

1. 𝐻𝑂: There is no significant difference in the advertising displays that affect sales.
2. 𝐻1: There is significant difference in the advertising displays that affect sales.
3. Test Statistics:

𝐹 < 𝐹𝑐 ∶ : 𝐴𝑐𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝐻𝑂
𝐹 > 𝐹𝑐 ∶ ∶ 𝑒𝑗𝑒𝑐𝑡 𝐻𝑂

4. Rejection Region: @0.05 level of significance

df = k-1=3_1=2 (NUMERATOR)
df = N-K=12-3=9 (DENOMINATOR)
𝐹𝑐 = 4.26

5. Calculation of Test Statistics:

X1 X1 2 X2 X2 2 X3 X3 2 X4 X42 X5 X52
551 303601 595 354025 639 408321 417 173889 563 316969
457 208849 800 640000 615 378225 449 201601 631 398161
450 202500 508 258064 511 261121 517 267289 522 272484
731 534361 583 339889 573 328329 438 191844 613 375769
499 249001 633 400689 648 419904 800 640000 656 430336
632 399424 517 267289 677 458329 555 308025 679 461041
Σ = 3320 1897736 3636 2E+06 3663 2254229 3176 1782648 3664 2254760

ΣX = 17459 ΣN = 30
[Type here]

Variance 1= 12133.87 Mean1 =

Variance 2 = 11308.00 Mean2 =
Variance 3 = 3593.50 Mean3 =
Variance 4 20297.06667 Mean4 =
Variance 5 = 3455.47 Mean5 =

529.333333
Mean 4 3 Variance 4= 20297.07

610.666666
MEAN5 7 Variance5 3455.467

Compute Sum of Squares Between Groups (SSB)

SSB = 34833.47

Compute Sum of Squares Within Groups (SSw)

SSw = 253939.50

Compute Mean Squares Between Groups (MSB)

MSB = 17416.73

Compute Mean Squares Within Groups (MSW)

28215.5
MSw = 0

Compute
for F-test
[Type here]

F= 0.62

Set-up
ANOVA Table

Table 1. Analysis of Variance between the

Advertizing Displays and the stores Sales
Source of d Deci Interpre
Variance SS f MS F sion tation
Between
groups 34833 1741
(treatment/st
2 0.
.47 6.73 Reje Signifi
rategy) 6 cted cant
Within group 25393 2821 2
(error)
9
9.50 5.50

Part B (20points).
Describe the result and make a comprehensive analysis and implications. Make
assumptions if deemed necessary.
The data presented the result of an engineering experiment on the moisture
absorption of sand and gravel in concrete mixtures. At 0.05 level there is a
significant differences of the moisture absorption considering the different type of
aggregates. Since the computed F is greater that the critical value Fc@ 0.05 level of
significance, then the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, there is significant
difference in advertising display that affected sales.
[Type here]

Activity No. 10 IN STATISTICS

(Topic: TWO-WAY ANOVA)

Problem:
A professor wants to compare the effects of the 3 types of exam namely; modified True- False,
Identification, Problem Solving in the subject Physics 2. He randomly assigned 36 students to the 3 groups,
18 per section. After the treatment was administered an examination (100- item) was conducted with the
following results:

Section Types of Exam

Modified True – Identification Problem Solving
False
80 85 A
76 96 81
50 100 68
X 91 36 91
100 25 100
62 48 28
90 99 92
68 100 77
Z 45 42 56
92 68 84
99 24 72
39 85 B
He wanted to determine which type of exam was related to the highest score, section X or Z got the exam
equally well and whether section X or Z profited equally from the different type of exams. Use level of
significance = 0.05
NOTE: A = the number of letters of your first name multiplied by 5
B = the number of letters of your family name multiplied by 6

Modified Problem
Sex
True-False Identification Solving
80 85 40
76 96 81
50 100 68
X
91 36 91
100 25 100
62 48 28
Y 90 99 92
68 100 77
45 42 56
[Type here]

92 68 84
99 24 72
39 85 48

He wanted to know which treatment was associated with the highest score, whether male or female
learned equally well and whether male or female profited equally from different treatment administered.

Ho1:
There no significant difference between the three
instructions that affected the highest score.

Ho2: There no significant difference learning of between male

and female

Ho3:
There no significant difference of the 3 instruction that
affected the highest scores between male and female

Modified Identification Problem

True or False Solving

80 6400 85 7225 40 1600

76 5776 96 9216 81 6561
50 2500 100 10000 68 4624
X
91 8281 36 1296 91 8281
100 10000 25 625 100 10000
62 3844 48 2304 28 784

Sum 459 36801 390 30666 408 31850 1257

18
6 506.25 6 1595 6 1231.8

Mean 76.5 65 68

Modified Identification Problem

Sex True or False Solving
[Type here]

90 8100 99 9801 92 8464

68 4624 100 10000 77 5929
45 2025 42 1764 56 3136
Y
92 8464 68 4624 84 7056
99 9801 24 576 72 5184
39 1521 85 7225 48 2304

Sum 433 34535 418 33990 429 32073 1280

986.05 1461 419.85 18

72.16667 69.67 71.5

892 808 837

12 12 12 2537
36

1 Solving for sum of squares between columns

303.39

2 Solving for sum of squares between rows

17.63

3 Solving for sum of squares between groups

[Type here]

113.47

4 Solving for sum of squares for interactions

-207.56

5 Solving for sum of squares within groups

113.2

6 Set-up ANOVA table

Source of P-
SS df F Fc Inter. Decision
Variance value
Between
(c - 1) =
columns 303.39
2
151.69 32.16 3.40 0.47 Significant Rejected
(treatment)
Between (r-1) = Not
Rows
9.63 1
9.63 2.04 4.26 0.00
Significant
Accepted

-
Interaction - (c-1)*(r- - Not
(int) 207.56 1) = 2 103.78
22.0 3.40 0.00
Significant
Accepted
0
(N -
Within
group
113.2 (c*r) = 4.72
24
Total 218.67
[Type here]

Decision 1
Since F = 33.29 > Fc = 3.40 then the null hypothesis is rejected. Therefore, there is
significant difference between the three instructions that affected the highest score.

Decision 2
Since F = 2.04 < Fc = 4.26 then the null hypothesis is ACCEPTED. Therefore, there no
significant difference of the learnings between male and female

Decision 3
Since F = 2.04 < Fc = 3.40 then the null hypothesis is ACCEPTED. Therefore, there no
significant difference of the 3 instruction that affected the highest scores between
male and female

Conclusion

The above ANOVA Table indicates that while the treatment effect is
statistically significant, neither the sex effect nor the treatment x sex was
significant.

Part B. Describe the result and make a comprehensive analysis and implications. Make
assumptions if deemed necessary. (Note: pls make your own. Do not copy the work of your
classmates or else both of you will never get a credit.)
Based on the results gathered,
[Type here]
 EDUC 202: Statistical Methods in Education
Southern Philippine College, Cagayan de Oro City

Name: TOLO, RADHEL FAITH V.

Activity No. 11 IN
STATISTICS
(Topic: PAIRED DATA-CORRELATION)

Problem:
The final test and exam averages for 20 randomly selected students taking a course in
engineering statistics and a course in operations research follow. Assume that the final
averages are jointly normally distributed.
a. Find the regression line relating the Statistics final average to the Operation Research
(OR) final average.
b. Determine the correlation coefficient “r “
c. Test the significance of the correlation using  = 0.05.

Statistics 86 75 69 75 90
OR 80 81 75 81 92

Statistics 94 83 86 71 65
OR 95 A 81 76 72

Statistics 84 71 62 90 83
OR 85 72 65 93 81

Statistics 75 71 76 84 97
OR 70 73 72 B 98

NOTE: A = the number of letters of your first name x 10 (in case it’s more than 100, use 100)
B = the number of letters of your family name x 10 (in case it’s more than 100, use
100)

X Y XY X^2 Y^2
1 86 80 6880 7396 6400
2 75 81 6075 5625 6561
3 69 75 5175 4761 5625
4 75 81 6075 5625 6561
5 90 92 8280 8100 8464
6 94 95 8930 8836 9025
7 83 80 6640 6889 6400
8 86 81 6966 7396 6561
9 71 76 5396 5041 5776
 EDUC 202: Statistical Methods in Education
Southern Philippine College, Cagayan de Oro City

Name: TOLO, RADHEL FAITH V.

10 65 72 4680 4225 5184

11 84 85 7140 7056 7225
12 71 72 5112 5041 5184
13 62 65 4030 3844 4225
14 90 93 8370 8100 8649
15 83 81 6723 6889 6561
16 75 70 5250 5625 4900
17 71 73 5183 5041 5329
18 76 72 5472 5776 5184
19 84 80 6720 7056 6400
20 97 98 9506 9409 9604
Sum 1587 1602 128603 127731 129818

N= 20
Null Hypothesis

There is no relationship between number of books read during school days and the number of hours spent in
watching tv.

Calculate the correlation as follows

= 29686

=32862.49771

or 0.90
 EDUC 202: Statistical Methods in Education
Southern Philippine College, Cagayan de Oro City

Name: TOLO, RADHEL FAITH V.

Part B (20points).

Describe the result and make a comprehensive analysis and implications. Make assumptions if deemed
necessary. (Note: pls make your own. Do not copy the work of your classmates or else both of you will
never get a credit.)

Based on the result, the relationship between the number of books read on school days and hours
spent in watching television is almost Perfect Negative. It means that there is no enough evidence
correlate the two variables. Thus , the the finding shows the relationship between the statistics final
average and the Operation Research is nearly negative and it does not have enough evidence to support
the claim.