Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KERNEL's SMU Vs Fonrich
KERNEL's SMU Vs Fonrich
1) I have heard about the problematic flat interface cables of the Fonrich monitoring device, which are unable
to provide sufficient noise protection from the internal service interface. Do you think that the separation of
the CPU from the sensor can significantly affect the accuracy of the measurement or its proper functioning?
2) I am aware that the RS-485 interface on KERNEL’s SMUs was successfully tested at 16 kV. Furthermore, the
advantage of Kernel’s SMUs with fiber is evident.
4) As far as I can tell, the power of solar panels power is not increasing at a rapid rate. And this can result in a
rise in the quantity of solar panels monitored on each channel. And the increase in the number of panels per
channel makes panel monitoring and diagnostics more difficult.
Note that small combiner boxes can be designed using our SMUs with 40, 45, and 60 Ampere inputs. Note also that
80 Amps fuses are commercially available.
Moreover, fuse manufacturers such as Adler provide little busbars to make parallel of few strings. Using 600 Watts
common panels, our code ST0HS0860NC can be used to measure a total current of 45/55 Amps from 3 parallel
strings. This solution enables the creation of a very compact box. One of the significant costs associated with the
boxes is the cost of enclosure.