Response

Summary:

IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far with developing their teaching portfolio and
that the participant will need to update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the remainder of the
IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Q2. Please enter the your name (teaching mentor):
Chance Densford

Q1. Please enter the participant's first and last name:
Madison Heath

Q18. Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm submission):
MHeath@CRH.org

Q3. Teaching Log Progress:
Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are given? Does the participant
appear to be on target to complete the minimum requirements for IPTeC?

IPTeC Requirements:

Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health professional students

Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation of or assessment of
learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs, presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor
alone without learners does NOT count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care activities, project
management, etc.

On track to meet all IPTeC requirements

Q4. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:
Madison has already completed the experiential & precepting hours and is on track to complete the didactic hours
soon.

Q5. Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and reflective. The participant
has considered his or her own personal approach to teaching and precepting.
Yes

Q6. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:
Madison has reflected on her time as a student and developed her own teaching philosophy based on her past
experiences. I believe this not only will help her in her teaching career, but will also benefit her students.

Q7. Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases, presentations) that reflect his or her
teaching philosophy.
Yes

Q8. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:
N/A

Q9. Feedback Regarding Teaching:
The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from students, peers, and/or
preceptors.
Yes

Q10. Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:
N/A

Q11. Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she did exceptionally well during
the lecture, as well as opportunities for improvement. If a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the
participant adequately reflect what was done differently to make the lecture successful?
Not included

Q12. Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:
I know that Madison self-reflects post lectures/presentations verbally. I have seen first hand, Madison incorporate these
self-reflections into other presentations to improve her overall quality.

Q13. Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?
Yes

Q14. Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:
Madison's portfolio is well-organized and easy to comprehend.

Embedded Data:
N/A