Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Personality and Cognitive Factors Influencing Substance Use and Sexual Risk For HIV Infection Among Gay and Bisexual Me
Personality and Cognitive Factors Influencing Substance Use and Sexual Risk For HIV Infection Among Gay and Bisexual Me
Substance use reliably predicts sexual risk behavior, and sensation-seeking person-
ality characteristics have been found to covary with these associations. In a study of
289 gay and bisexual men attending a large gay pride event, the authors examined
the role of substance use sexual outcome expectancies in explaining associations
between sensation seeking, substance use, and risky sex. Consistent with previous
research, alcohol and other drugs were associated with sexual behavior. However,
path analyses showed that sensation seeking accounted for variance in sexual
behavior over and above substance use before sex and that sensation seeking
predicted substance use expectancies that in turn predicted substance use before sex.
It was concluded that altering substance use outcome expectancies may be an
important strategy for HTV risk reduction for individuals high in sensation seeking.
Since the beginning of the AIDS crisis, gay successfully changed dieir behavior and many
and bisexual men living in U.S. HTV epicenters men who had reduced their risks have reverted
have demonstrated significant reductions in to unsafe sexual practices (Ekstrand & Coates,
sexual practices that confer high risk for HIV 1990; Kelly, Kalichman, et al., 1991; Kelly, St.
infection (Fordyce et al., 1995). However, Lawrence, & Brasfield, 1991). Continued prac-
among the many men who have reduced their tice of unsafe sex is complicated by multiple
numbers of sexual partners, ceased practicing social, interpersonal, and individual influences.
unprotected anal intercourse, and increased dieir Among the most widely studied factors influenc-
use of condoms, a significant number have not ing sexual risk behavior is the use of alcohol and
other drugs in conjunction with sex.
Substance use is closely associated with
Seth C. Kalichman, Center for AIDS Intervention high-risk sexual practices in gay and bisexual
Research, Medical College of Wisconsin; Libby men. For example, research with over 500 men
Tannenbaum and Dena Nachimson, Department of
from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study
Psychology, Georgia State University.
showed that use of alcohol and nitrite inhalants
We thank Our Common Welfare, Inc., Atlanta,
Georgia; the Atlanta Gay Pride Committee; and the significantly contributed to practicing unpro-
gay community of Atlanta for their support of this tected anal intercourse and numbers of sexual
study and Charsey Cherry, Ernestine Williams, Tsila partners (Davidson et al., 1992), with similar
Abush-Kirsh, and Marco T. Sanders for assisting with findings reported in other studies (McCusker et
data collection. This research was supported by al., 1990; Ostrow et al., 1990, 1993; Temple,
National Institute of Mental Health Grant R01- Leigh, & Schafer, 1993). Alcohol is related to
MH57624.
sex with new and casual partners (Temple &
Correspondence concerning this article should be
Leigh, 1992; Temple et al., 1993), and other
addressed to Seth C. Kalichman, Center for AIDS
Intervention Research, Medical College of Wiscon-
drugs are associated with sexual risk across a
sin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, Wiscon- broader range of relationships (Ostrow et al.,
sin 53226. Electronic mail may be sent to sethk@ 1993). Such factors as social disinhibition,
mcw.edu. substance-using networks, and economics may
262
SUBSTANCE USE EXPECTANCIES AND RISK FOR HIV 263
account for the relationship between substance (Earlywine & Finn, 1991). In addition, Ostrow,
use and sexual risk, but these relationships have DiFranchesco, and Kalichman (1997) showed
not been well explained. that sexual adventurism—a construct adapted
Use of mood-altering substances as a part of from sensation seeking—significantly predicted
sexual encounters is firmly embedded in West- contracting HIV infection in a cohort of gay and
ern culture (Goldman & Roehrich, 1991). In bisexual men over and above substance use.
some cases, the association between substance This study was the first to link a personality
use and sexual risk behavior is at least partly disposition to an HIV-disease relevant outcome.
pharmacological, such as the case of nitrite Unfortunately, a mechanism relevant to interven-
inhalants used to relax anal musculature for tions that would explain sensation seeking as a
increasing the ease of anal intercourse (Ostrow predictor of substance use and sexual risk
et al., 1993). Most substances, however, become behaviors has not been explicated.
associated with sex through psychological Among cognitive mechanisms that may link
factors such as attributions and expectancies for sensation seeking to substance use and risk
sexual enhancement, disinhibition, and social behavior are alcohol and other drug outcome
facilitation. Substance use may also be associ- expectancies and beliefs about the effects of
ated with sexual behavior through a third, often various substances on thoughts, moods, and
unmeasured, variable (Halpern-Felsher, Mill- behaviors. In a study of gay and bisexual men,
stein, & Ellen, 1996; Leigh, 1990b; Leigh & for example, McKirnan and Peterson (1988)
Stall, 1993), such as personality dispositions found that tension reduction expectancies for
that motivate an array of risky practices. outcomes of alcohol use were associated with
Studies have demonstrated an association alcohol abuse. Alcohol-related outcome expect-
between sexual behavior and sensation seeking, ancies have been tied to the use of alcohol
defined as the propensity for an individual to before engaging in sex. Consistent with research
seek optimal arousal and sensory stimulating on alcohol expectancies for social facilitation
experiences. Individuals who score high on (Hittner, 1997; Smith, Goldman, Greenbaum, &
measures of sensation seeking report greater Christiansen, 1995), Leigh (1990a) found that
frequencies of sex with a greater number of expectations for alcohol use to enhance and
partners (Fisher & Misovich, 1990; Newcomb disinhibit sexual activity were related to initiat-
& McGee, 1991; Zuckerman, 1994). In research ing sexual activity as well as using alcohol
with gay and bisexual men, sensation seeking before sex. Sexual outcome expectancies for
predicts frequencies of unprotected anal inter- alcohol and other drugs may therefore function
course and numbers of sex partners (Kalichman as the cognitive processes through which
et al., 1994; Kalichman & Rompa, 1995). sensation seeking is linked to substance use and
Sensation seeking may also explain the associa- sexual behavior.
tion between substance use and risky sex. In the current study, we sought to replicate
Kalichman, Heckman, and Kelly (1996), for previous research showing that sensation seek-
example, found that sensation seeking signifi- ing predicts sexual risk behavior over and above
cantly predicted sexual risk behavior over and alcohol and other drug use before sex. In
above alcohol and other drug use in conjunction addition, we examined the hypothesis that
with sex. In addition, sensation seeking predicts sensation seeking would predict substance use
sexual behavior through alcohol and other drug before sex through sexual outcome expectan-
use, indicating that sensation seeking may cies. For both alcohol and other drug use, we
account for at least part of the relationship tested a model where sensation seeking predicts
between substance use and sexual behavior. sexual behavior as an independent factor over
Similarly, causal modeling in a study of college and above substance use and where sensation
students showed the association between behav- seeking functions through outcome expectan-
ioral disinhibition and a propensity to abuse cies to predict substance use before sex, which
alcohol was accounted for by sensation seeking in turn predicts risky sex.
264 KALICHMAN, TANNENBAUM, AND NACHIMSON
ity for the Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale condoms. The same format was used to assess
(a = .75, test-retest r = .78), and the alpha use of other drugs before protected and unpro-
coefficient was .83 for an 8-item version of this tected anal intercourse. Assessing the use of
scale used in the current study. substances in relation to sexual behavior links
Alcohol and drug use outcome expectancies. the two activities and therefore provides a more
To assess substance use outcome expectancies, exact assessment of the substance use-sexual
we asked participants to complete two separate behavior relationship than does an assessment of
measures for alcohol and other drug use. First, global substance use over a given time period
participants who had ever drank alcohol (94%) (Leigh, 1990b; Leigh & Stall, 1993). The
completed eight items reflecting sexual enhanc- retrospective time frame was 6 months and
ing outcome expectancies for drinking. Items therefore matched the time frame used to assess
were adapted from a widely used alcohol sexual behavior. Open response formats were
outcome expectancies measure (Brown, Gold- used, asking participants to recall the frequency
man, Inn, & Anderson, 1980). We specifically of sexual acts that occurred in conjunction with
selected sexual expectancy items to parallel the alcohol or other drug use in the past 6 months.
sexual specificity of the sensation-seeking and Participants were encouraged to think back over
substance use measures without overlapping the previous 6 months, using seasonal and other
content. Example items include I feel horny or time-related cues to assist recall.
sexual after I have been drinking, lama better Sexual behavior. Sexual behavior was mea-
lover after I have been drinking, Sex is better sured by asking participants to report the
after I have been drinking, and I get turned on number of times and the number of partners
sexually easier after drinking. Items were with whom they had engaged in anal inter-
responded to on 4-point scales (1 = strongly course, as the insertive and receptive partner, as
disagree to 4 = strongly agree). The alcohol well as the number of times and partners for
outcome expectancy measure was internally occasions when they used or did not use
consistent in this study (a = .93). condoms during anal intercourse in the past 6
We used a parallel measure to assess drug use months. Men were also asked to report their
sexual outcome expectancies. Participants were total number of male sex partners for the past 6
first asked to report which of the following months. Similar to the measure of substance use
drugs they liked using the most: marijuana, before sex, open response formats with instruc-
crack cocaine, other forms of cocaine, nitrite tions to think back over time markers were used
inhalants (poppers), speed/uppers, or other for the sexual behavior measures to reduce
drugs. Men who circled at least one of these response bias and to minimize measurement
drugs (« = 114, 65%) completed eight items error (Catania, Gibson, Chitwood, & Coates,
that paralleled the same content as the alcohol 1990; Kauth, St. Lawrence, & Kelly, 1991).
expectancy scale but with reference to the
participant's most used drug. For example, items Data Quality Assurances
included I feel homy or sexual after I have been
and Statistical Analyses
using this drug, I am a better lover after I have
been using this drug, Sex is better after I have Several steps were taken to assure that
been using this drug, and Using this drug helps surveys included in the data analyses were
me have better sex. Again, with the same 4-point accurately coded. First, each survey was indi-
response format as the alcohol expectancy scale, vidually inspected for internally consistent
the drug use outcome expectancy scale demon- response patterns, with inconsistencies treated
strated an alpha of .95. as missing data. Second, all entered data were
Substance use in conjunction with sex. Use verified by using a double entry procedure.
of alcohol and other drugs in relation to Finally, frequencies of each variable were
unprotected and protected anal sex encounters inspected for possible outliers or miskeyed
over the past 6 months was assessed. Partici- entries, with potential errors checked against the
pants were asked to report the number of times original surveys.
in the past 6 months they drank alcohol before To examine the relationships among sensa-
engaging in anal intercourse with and without tion seeking, substance use expectancies, sub-
266 KALICHMAN, TANNENBAUM, AND NACHIMSON
stance use before sex, and risky sexual behavior, (Osmond et al., 1994). Finally, recall for
we performed correlational and path analyses numbers of sex partners is more reliable than
for alcohol use and drug use separately. Path frequencies of sexual acts over 6-month time
analyses were performed using procedures frames (Kauth et al., 1991). All variables were
described by Asher (1983). Analyses were inspected for skewness and those that demon-
conducted to identify associations between the strated significant divergence from normality
number of male sex partners men reported in the were transformed using the formula Logw[X+ 1]
previous 6 months with three predictor vari- (Winer, 1971). Table 1 presents the means,
ables: alcohol use before sex, alcohol outcome standard deviations, skewness, and kurtosis for
expectancies, and sexual sensation seeking. The each of the measures. As shown, substance use
following path analyses were performed enter- before sex and numbers of partners were highly
ing sensation seeking (SS), substance use skewed and therefore transformed for regression
expectancies (Exp), substance use before sex analyses. Table 2 presents the intercorrelations
(Subst), and number of male sex partners: among measures. As shown in the table,
correlations were small to moderate in magni-
SS, Exp, Subst => Partners tude, suggesting that the scales tapped related
but different constructs.
and SS (Subst, Partners) => Exp
and Subst (SS, Exp) => Partners. Results showed that among the 176 men who
were not in long-term exclusive relationships,
Using the above equations, we examined 114 (65%) reported 2 or more male sex partners
direct and indirect effects of variables on in the previous 6 months. The mean number of
numbers of sex partners. These analyses were male partners for these men was 6.0 (SD = 8.8,
repeated for drug use variables predicting range = 2-70). Fifty (44%) men with multiple
numbers of partners. male partners engaged in unprotected anal
We used the number of reported male sex intercourse compared to 9 (25%) men who
partners as the dependent variable in the reported one partner, x20, N= 150) = 4.08,
analyses for several reasons. First, because our p < .05, demonstrating increased risk for HIV
measure of substance use before sex specified infection among men with multiple sex partners.
anal intercourse in conjunction with alcohol and Table 3 presents the demographic, substance
other drug use, specifying unprotected anal use, and sexual behaviors for men with and
intercourse as the dependent variable would without multiple male partners. The majority of
have been circular. Second, although HIV men (95%) reported lifetime use of alcohol and
transmission risk occurs in monogamous rela- therefore completed the alcohol outcome expec-
tionships, serial monogamy and multiple sex tancy measure, and 64% reported use of other
partners remain independent predictors of HIV drugs, therefore completing the drug use out-
risk among men who have sex with men come expectancy measure. The following sec-
Table 1
Means, Standard Deviations, and Distribution Statistics for Measures Included in Path Analyses
Measure M SD Skewness SE Kurtosis SE
No. male partners 4.1 7.6 5.5 0.2 38.1 0.3
Alcohol use before sex 1.9 6.8 5.7 0.2 38.3 0.3
Drag use before sex 1.7 7.0 5.9 0.2 39.2 0.4
Alcohol expectancies 14.4 5.6 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.4
Drag expectancies 16.7 7.1 0.2 0.2 -1.0 0.4
Sensation seeking 17.6 4.8 0.5 0.2 -0.1 0.3
SUBSTANCE USE EXPECTANCIES AND RISK FOR fflV 267
Table 2
Correlations Among Sensation Seeking, Substance Use Expectancies, Substance Use Before Sex,
and Numbers of Sex Partners
No. male Substance use Substance use Sensation
Variable sex partners before sex expectancies seeking Expectancies
Sensation seeking .26** .18* .42**
Expectancies .07 .30** .49** —
Substance use before sex .45** .25** .17
No. male partners .47** .17 .30**
Note. Correlations for alcohol use appear above the diagonal and correlations for other drag use appear below
the diagonal.
*p < .05. **p < .01 (two-tailed).
tions test models predicting number of sex use before sex, alcohol use sexual outcome
partners from substance use before sex, sub- expectancies, and sensation seeking predicted
stance use expectancies, and sensation seeking. number of male sex partners, R = .51,
F(3, 155) = 18.52, p < .01, accounting for
Alcohol Use and Sexual Risk Behavior
24.9% of the variance in numbers of sex
Multiple regression analyses testing the path partners (see Table 4). Analyses of the path SS
SS, Exp, Subst => Partners, showed that alcohol (Exp, Subst) => Partners, showed that sensation
Table 3
Demographic, Substance Use, and Sexual Behavior Characteristics of Men Reporting and Not
Reporting Multiple Male Sexual Partners
Men not reporting Men reporting multiple
multiple male male sex partners
sex partners (N = 62) (N = 114)
Characteristic M SD M SD
Age 32.7 7.6 32.4 8.7
Education 14.5 2.1 14.6 2.1
Frequency of unprotected receptive acts 1.3 5.5 1.4 4.7
Frequency of unprotected insertive anal acts 0.7 3.8 1.1 3.3
N % N %
White 52 87 96 88
Income under $30,000 42 68 73 64
Gay identified 56 90 101 89
Bisexual identified 6 10 13 11
Relationship for 6+ months 13 21 24 21
Tested for HIV 44 71 100 89
HIV + (of those tested) 10 22 23 23
Treated for an STD 21 34 26 23
Received money for sex 8 13 19 17
Paid money for sex 5 8 18 16
Substance use in the past 6 months
Alcohol 51 82 99 88
Marijuana 21 34 43 39
Powder cocaine 8 13 18 17
Crack cocaine 3 5 6 6
Amphetamine 2 3 5 5
Treated for alcohol abuse 6 10 5 4
Treated for drug abuse 5 8 8 7
Note. STD = sexually transmitted disease.
268 KALICHMAN, TANNENBAUM, AND NACHIMSON
Table 4
Standardized Betas and Percentage of Variance Accounted for in Multiple Regressions for Sexual
Sensation Seeking, Substance Use Expectancies, and Substance Use Before Sex as Predictors of
Number of Male Sex Partners
Alcohol Other drugs
Variable Adjusted ft R2 Adjusted ft R2
Substance use before sex .45** .47**
Substance use outcome expectancies -.18* -.05
Sexual sensation seeking .19* .249 .23** .267
*p < .05. **p < .01 (two-tailed).
Sensation
Seeking
.25*'
.41*
Number of Male
Sex Partners
Alcohol
Expectancies
Figure 1. Path coefficients for the model predicting number of male sex partners from alcohol use, alcohol
outcome expectancies, and sensation seeking. **p < .01.
SUBSTANCE USE EXPECTANCIES AND RISK FOR HIV 269
Sensation
Seeking
.25*'
Drug
Expectancies
Figure 2. Path coefficients for the model predicting number of male sex partners from other drag use, drag
outcome expectancies, and sensation seeking. *p < .05. **p < .01.
showed that sensation seeking also accounted contrast with previous research that showed
for 20% of the variance in drug outcome alcohol use to function quite differently in
expectancies, F = 30.1, p < .01. The associa- predicting sexual risk compared with other
tion between drug expectancies and drug use drugs (Kalichman et al., 1996). Potential expla-
before sex tested in the path Exp (SS, Partners) =* nations for these discrepancies include both
Subst was also significant, A/?2 = .03, F = 4.8, sampling and measurement differences between
p < .01. These findings therefore parallel those studies. First, our sample was not selected from
for the alcohol use variables. Figure 2 presents a substance use treatment setting, suggesting
the coefficients for significant paths predicting that alcohol and other drugs may have served
number of male sex partners from sensation similar functions in nonaddicted men. Second,
seeking and drug use variables. we studied mostly middle-class men, minimiz-
ing me role sex can play in accessing drugs as it
Discussion may in lower income samples. Third, our
measurement strategy required that only men
Substance use is among the most consistent who used substances complete the outcome
behavioral markers for HTV-related sexual risk expectancy measures, therefore not representing
behavior. The current study once again found men who may hold the lowest expectancies for
that alcohol and other drug use in the context of sexual outcomes. Our study is also limited by
sex occurs more frequently among gay and the potential overlap of sexual sensation-
bisexual men at relatively higher risk for HTV seeking and sexual outcome expectancies, as
infection than men at lower risk. Furthermore, well as their associations to sexual behavior.
the association between substance use and risky However, because there was no direct content
sex was again related to sensation seeking. In overlap across measures and the intercorrela-
addition to providing evidence for sensation tions among measures were small to moderate,
seeking as a third variable accounting for the our measures appear to tap independent con-
substance use-risky sex connection, we sup- structs. Still, the potentially inflated associations
ported our hypothesis that sexual outcome between measures due to overlap should be
expectancies for substance use may serve as a considered when interpreting these results.
cognitive mechanism through which sensation These limitations to the study, along with our
seeking influences substance use before sex. To reliance on a convenience sample of men
our knowledge, this is the first report of attending a gay pride event, which probably
cognitions identified to explain sensation seek- overrepresents men who are open about their
ing as a predictor of substance use and risky sex. sexuality, and use of self-report measures, must
We observed similar patterns of associations be considered when interpreting these findings.
between alcohol use variables and risky sex as Alcohol and drug use expectancies serve as
we did other drug use variables. These findings an underlying architecture for beliefs about the
270 KALICHMAN, TANNENBAUM, AND NACHIMSON
incentives for vising substances in relation to sex Edwards, R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, & E. J. Posavac
(Hittner, 1997). Substance use outcome expect- (Eds.), Social influence processes and prevention
ancies are embedded in culture as well as (pp. 39-70). New York: Plenum.
personal experience. Expectations are rein- Fordyce, E. J., Williams, R. D., Surick, I. W., Shum,
R., Quintyne, R., & Thomas, P. (1995). Trends in the
forced by the ubiquitous connection between
AIDS epidemic among men who reported sex with
substance use and sex in commercial advertise-
men in New York City: 1981-1993. AIDS Educa-
ments; music, film, and other forms of popular
tion and Prevention, 7, 3-13.
culture; the role that bars and clubs play in Goldman, M. S. (1994). The alcohol expectancy
meeting potential sex partners; and issues of concept: Applications to assessment, prevention,
economics and power. Cognitive influences and treatment of alcohol abuse. Applied and
such as outcome expectancies offer opportuni- Prevention Psychology, 3, 131—144.
ties for prevention that are not apparent when Goldman, M. S., & Roehrich, L. (1991). Alcohol
one considers personality dispositions such as expectancies and sexuality. Alcohol Health and
sensation seeking alone (Goldman, 1994). How- Research World, 15, 126-132.
ever, complex constructs like sensation seeking Halpern-Felsher, B., Millstein, S., & Ellen, J. (1996).
Relationship of alcohol use and risky sexual
are unlikely to be explained by a single
behavior: A review and analysis of findings. Journal
cognitive dimension such as outcome expectan-
of Adolescent Health, 19, 331-336.
cies. Biological, experiential, and context spe-
Hickson, E, Reid, D., Davies, P., Weatheiburn, P.,
cific influences on behavior interact with Beardsell, S., & Keogh, P. (1996). No aggregate
dispositions to predict sexual behavior and change in homosexual HIV risk behaviour among
substance use. Research is therefore needed to gay men attending the Gay Pride Festivals, United
further examine factors that explain the associa- Kingdom, 1993-1995. AIDS, 10, 771-774.
tions between sensation seeking, substance use, Hittner, I. (1997). Alcohol-related outcome expectan-
and sexual risk behavior in populations vulner- cies: Construct overview and implications for
able to HIV infection. primary and secondary prevention. Journal of
Primary Prevention, 17, 297-314.
Kalichman, S. C., Adair, V., Rompa, D., Multhauf, K.,
References lohnson, J., & Kelly, I. (1994). Sexual Sensation-
Seeking: Scale development and predicting AIDS-
Asher, H. B. (1983). Causal modeling. Newbury risk behavior among homosexually active men.
Park, CA: Sage. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62, 385-397.
Brown, S., Goldman, M. S., Inn, A., & Anderson, L. Kalichman, S. C., Heckman, T., & Kelly, I. A. (1996).
(1980). Expectancies of reinforcement from alco- Sensation seeking as an explanation for the
hol: Their domain and relation to drinking patterns. association between substance use and HIV-related
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, risky sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
419-426. 25, 141-154.
Catania, J. A., Gibson, D., Chitwood, D., & Coates, Kalichman, S. C., Kelly, I. A., Morgan, M., & Rompa,
T. J. (1990). Methodological problems in AIDS D. (1997). Fatalism, future outlook, current life
behavioral research: Influences on measurement satisfaction, and risk for human immunodeficiency
error and participation bias in studies of sexual virus (HIV) infection among gay and bisexual men.
behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 339-362. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65,
Davidson, S., Dew, M. A., Penkower, L., Becker, J. T., 542-546.
Kingsley, L., & Sullivan, P. F. (1992). Substance use Kalichman, S. C., & Rompa, D. (1995). Sexual
and sexual behavior among homosexual men at risk sensation seeking and sexual compulsivity scales:
for HIV infection: Psychosocial moderators. Psy- Reliability, validity, and predicting HIV risk behav-
chology and Health, 7, 259-272. iors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65, 586-
Earlywine, M., & Finn, P. (1991). Sensation seeking 602.
explains the relation between behavioral disinhibi- Kauth, M. R., St. Lawrence, J. S., & Kelly, J. A.
tion and alcohol consumption. Addictive Behaviors, (1991). Reliability of retrospective assessments of
16, 123-128. sexual HIV risk behavior: A comparison of
Ekstrand, M., & Coates, T. J. (1990). Maintenance of biweekly, three-month, and twelve-month self-
safer sexual behaviors and predictors of risky sex. reports. AIDS Education and Prevention, 3, 207-
American Journal of Public Health, 80, 973-977. 214.
Fisher, J. D., & Misovich, S. J. (1990). Social Kelly, J. A., Kaliehman, S. C., Kauth, M. R., Kilgore,
influence and AIDS-preventive behavior. In J. H. G., Hood, H. V, Campos, P. E., Rao, S. M.,
SUBSTANCE USE EXPECTANCIES AND RISK FOR fflV 271
Brasfield, T. L., & St. Lawrence, J. S. (1991). Francisco young men's health study. American
Situational factors associated with AIDS risk Journal of Public Health, 84,1933-1937.
behavior lapses and coping strategies used by gay Ostrow, D. G., Beltran, E. D., Joseph, J. G.,
men who successfully avoid lapses. American DiFranchesco, W., Wesch, J., & Chmiel, J. (1993).
Journal of Public Health, 81, 1335-1338. Recreational drugs and sexual behavior in the
Kelly, J. A., St. Lawrence, J. S., & Brasfield, T. L. Chicago MACS/CCS cohort of homosexually ac-
(1991). Predictors of vulnerability to AIDS risk tive men. Journal of Substance Abuse, 5, 311-325.
behavior relapse. Journal of Consulting and Clini- Ostrow, D., DiFranchesco, W., & Kalichman, S. C.
cal Psychology, 59,163-166. (1997). Sexual adventurism and high-risk sexual
Leigh, B. C. (1990a). The relationship of sex-related behavior among gay and bisexual men at risk for
alcohol expectancies to alcohol consumption and HIV infection. AIDS and Behavior, 1,191-202.
sexual behavior. British Journal of Addiction, 85, Ostrow, D. G., VanRaden, M. J., Fox, R., Kingsley,
919-928. L. A., Dudley, J., & Kaslow, R. A. (1990).
Leigh, B. C. (1990b). The relationship of substance Recreational drug use and sexual behavior change
use during sex to high-risk sexual behavior. Journal in a cohort of homosexual men: The Multicenter
of Sex Research, 27, 199-213. AIDS Cohort Study. AIDS, 4, 759-765.
Leigh, B. C., & Stall, R. (1993). Substance use and Smith, G. T, Goldman, M. S., Greenbaum, P., &
risky sexual behavior for exposure to HIV: Issues in Christiansen, B. (1995). Expectancy for social
methodology, interpretation, and prevention. Ameri- facilitation from drinking: The divergent paths of
can Psychologist, 48, 1035-1045. high-expectancy and low-expectancy adolescents.
McCusker, J., Westenhouse, J., Stoddard, A. M., Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 32-40.
Zapka, J. G., Zora, M. W., & Mayer, K. H. (1990). Temple, M. T, & Leigh, B. C. (1992). Alcohol
Use of drugs and alcohol by homosexually active consumption and unsafe sexual behavior in discrete
men in relation to sexual practices. Journal of events. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 207-219.
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 3, 729— Temple, M. T., Leigh, B. C., & Schafer, J. (1993).
736. Unsafe sexual behavior and alcohol use at the event
McKirnan, D., & Peterson, P. (1988). Stress, expect- level: Results of a national survey. Journal of
ancies, and vulnerability to substance abuse: A test Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 6, 393—
of a model among homosexual men. Journal of 401.
Abnormal Psychology, 97, 461-466. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimen-
Newcomb, M. D., & McGee, L. (1991). Influence of tal design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
sensation seeking on general deviance and specific Zuckerman. M. (1994). Biological expressions and
problem behaviors from adolescence to young biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York:
adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Cambridge University Press.
Psychology, 61, 614-628.
Osmond, D. H., Page, K., Wiley, i., Garrett, K.,
Sheppard, H., Moss, A., Schrager, L., & Winkel- Received June 9, 1997
stein, W. (1994). HIV infection in homosexual and Revision received October 8,1997
bisexual men 18 to 29 years of age: The San Accepted December 29, 1997