Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction To Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. The Common Law 2. Introduction To Felix Frankfurter
Introduction To Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. The Common Law 2. Introduction To Felix Frankfurter
Introduction To Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. The Common Law 2. Introduction To Felix Frankfurter
Name
Institution
Course
Date
2
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. was a Supreme Court Judge who was widely regarded as the
founder of legal realism. He had a substantial impact on the evolution of the law. Holmes, as
noted by Panzarella & Vona (2013), advanced the Theory of Pragmatism, which argues that the
law should be founded on the needs of the people and the state of affairs of the time rather than
on conventional or natural law. His most famous work, The Common Law, explores the history
of law and legal systems, focusing on the idea that law is a product of social or political goals
legislatures created more and more of the law, and judges created less and less of the law. Choo
(2020) stated how Holmes argued that lawmaking should be done by elected legislators and
applied to cases by the courts as literally as possible. Holmes, per Panzarella & Vona (2013),
helped shape the concept of legal realism, which holds that the law should be grounded in the
practical concerns of society rather than abstract principles of right and wrong. In the
Metaphysical Society, where prominent American Pragmatist William James was also a
member, he participated. Holmes held that the law should reflect the will of the people rather
than a fixed set of ideas. The argument has been used to explain the growth of federal authority
in sectors including the economy, labor practices, education, healthcare, and criminal justice
(White, 2021).
Holmes's views on the law have been highly influential in the development of modern
law. His opinions still shape legal policy today, and his ideas on legal realism are still relevant to
current debates on the judiciary's role. His belief that law should be based on the people's will
The chapter provides an overview of the life and works of Felix Frankfurter, a renowned
judge, lawyer, and professor who played an instrumental role in the legal realism and judicial
restraint movements (Panzarella & Vona, 2013). Frankfurter argued that the courts should be
very reluctant to declare laws unconstitutional. He believed that Congress and state legislatures
were also responsible for preserving liberty, even when rules seemed to infringe on constitutional
rights. Panzarella & Vona (2013) note how Frankfurter strongly influenced the interpretation of
statutes, which he believed should be interpreted according to their overall purpose and spirit
Frankfurter's legacy is still relevant today, particularly in constitutional law. His views
on legal realism and judicial restraint are still widely discussed and often referred to when
considering questions of judicial review. Furthermore, his thoughts on interpreting statutes have
been highly influential in developing legal reasoning. Frankfurter's legacy is also relevant in
terms of civil liberties and protecting the rights of the underprivileged. His strong advocacy for
the rights of the needy in the workplace and his opposition to the unfair legal proceedings in the
Sacco and Vanzetti case are useful reminders of the value of ensuring legal equality for all
citizens.
liberties. His views on legal realism and judicial restraint are still highly relevant today, and his
thoughts on the interpretation of statutes have had a lasting impact on legal reasoning. His work
to protect the rights of the poor serves as a powerful reminder of the need of upholding legal
Reference
Choo, H. T. (2020). Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas.
Panzarella, R. A. & D Vona, (2013). Criminal Justice Masterworks A History of Ideas about