Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

EFFECTIVENESS

IN CONTEXT
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS
Marketing works in two ways
Brand building
Long term sales growth
Sales uplift over base

Sales activation
Short term sales uplifts

Time
Source: Binet & Field 2013
The 60:40 rule
1.6
large business effects

1.4
Number of very

1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
<50% 50-70% >70%
% of budget allocated to brand building
Source: IPA Databank, 2014-16 cases
How do the rules vary
by marketing context?
Nature of the purchase decision
100%
90% 19% 24% 26%
32%
80% 41% 41%
% Communications budget

70%
60%
Activation
50%
Brand
40% 81% 76% 74%
68%
30% 59% 59%
20%
10%
0%
Low High Emotional Rational Low High
Consideration Primary System Online research
Source: IPA Databank, 1998-2016 for-profit cases
Mechanics of the purchase
100%
90% 22% 26%
80% 42% 39%
% Communications budget

70%
60%
Activation
50%
Brand
40% 78% 74%
30% 58% 61%
20%
10%
0%
Offline Online Repeat Subscription

Source: IPA Databank, 1998-2016 for-profit cases


Product innovation
100%
90% 20%
80% 35%
% Communications budget

70%
60%
% Actvation
50%
% Brand
40% 80%
30% 65%

20%
10%
0%
No innovation Any innovation

Source: IPA Databank, 1998-2016 for-profit cases


Brand size
100%
90% 17%
33% 30% 27%
80%
% Communications budget

70%
60%
50%
83% % activation
40%
67% 70% 73%
30% % brand
20%
10%
0%
Small brands Bottom 50% Top 50% Leader brands
(avg SOM = 3%) (avg. SOM = 7%) (avg SOM = 31%) (avg SOM = 33%)

Source: IPA Databank, 1998-2016 for-profit cases


Excludes new and niche brands
Pricing strategy
Strategies for increasing price Brand-building is the key
12%
12%
10.0%

% campaigns with VL price fx


10%
10%
% campaigns with VL price fx

8% 8%
7.0%

6% 6%

4% 3.0% 4%

2% 2%

0% 0%
Continue with Launch new Reposition 0 1 2 3 4+
existing range sub-brand brand No. VL brand effects

Source: IPA Databank, 1998-2016 for-profit cases


Brand development
100%
90% 16%
22%
32% 31%
80% 38%
% Communications budget

70%
60%
% Actvation
50%
84% % Brand
40% 78%
68% 69%
30% 62%
20%
10%
0%
Range Repositioning Relaunch / New sub- Into new
unchanged Rebranding brand category
Source: IPA Databank, 1998-2016 for-profit cases
Penetration vs loyalty
2.0%
1.8%
Annual mkt. share growth

1.6%
1.4%
1.2%
1.0%
0.8%
0.6%
0.4%
0.2%
0.0%
Loyalty strategy Acquisition strategy Reach strategy

Penetration is always the main driver. Loyalty strategies always under-perform.

Base: 2008-16 IPA cases


The Media Landscape in 2016
2017
100 Broadcast TV
OOH
90
Radio
80 Email
Weekly Reach (% Adults)

70 Other online Texting


Newsbrands Social networking
60 Search

50 Messaging
Shopping/
40 transacting
Online video Internet for work
30
Subscriber VoD
20
Cinema
10

0
0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
Average Hours Per Day (Across All Adults)
Source: IPA Touchpoints
Digital makes mass media more effective
45%
40%
business effects from adding

40%
% increase in avg. no. VL

35%
30% 27% 27% 27%
25% 22% 22%
20%
13% 14%
15%
10%
5%
0%
TV Press Radio Outdoor

Source: IPA Databank


*Outdoor = 2012 - 2016
Web 1.0 (1998 - 2006) Web 2.0 (2008* - 2016)
But what about tech firms?

UK adspend – 12 month rolling (Nielsen)


Mass marketing is alive and well
EFFECTIVENESS
IN CONTEXT
PRELIMINARY FINDINGS

You might also like