PENILAIAN PRAKTIK PROJECT LITERATURE REVIEW SCOPING REVIEW

PROGRAM STUDI KEBIDANAN PROGRAM MAGISTER

UNIVERSITAS ‘AISYIYAH YOGYAKARTA

Nama Mahasiswa : Hasiati Hamado

NIM : 2210102035
Judul review : Gambaran Pengetahuan Ibu Hamil Tentang Tanda
Bahaya Dalam Kehamilan

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) Checklist
Kriteria pemberian skor
Skor 3 : Komponen pada checklist tertulis lengkap, tata Bahasa baik, dapat dipahami dengan baik oleh pembaca,
informasi yang dituliskan relevan dengan komponen checklist
Skor 2 : terdapat lebih dari 1-2 komponen pada checklist yang tidak lengkap, tata Bahasa cukup baik, terdapat
beberapa kesalahan namun bersifat minor
Skor 1 : terdapat lebih dari 2 komponen pada checklist yang tidak lengkap, kohesi dan koherensi penulisan sulit
dipahami oleh pembaca, kesalahan-kesalahan pada komponen checklist bersifat mayor
Section A Manuscript (Bobot 70%)
REPORT 3 2 1
ITE
SECTION PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM ED ON
M
PAGE #
TITLE
Click here
Title 1 Identify the report as a scoping review. to enter
text.
ABSTRACT
 REPORT 3 2 1
ITE
SECTION PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM ED ON
M
PAGE #
Provide a structured summary that includes (as
applicable): background, objectives, eligibility Click here
Structured criteria, sources of evidence, charting methods,
2 to enter
summary results, and conclusions that relate to the review text.
questions and objectives.
INTRODUCTION
Describe the rationale for the review in the context
Click here
of what is already known. Explain why the review
Rationale 3 to enter
questions/objectives lend themselves to a scoping
text.
review approach.
Provide an explicit statement of the questions and
objectives being addressed with reference to their
Click here
key elements (e.g., population or participants,
Objectives 4 to enter
concepts, and context) or other relevant key
text.
elements used to conceptualize the review questions
and/or objectives.
METHODS
Indicate whether a review protocol exists; state if PENILAIAN PADA BAGIAN INI
Click here
Protocol and and where it can be accessed (e.g., a Web address); DIABAIKAN
5 to enter
registration and if available, provide registration information,
text.
including the registration number.
Specify characteristics of the sources of evidence
Click here
Eligibility used as eligibility criteria (e.g., years considered,
6 to enter
criteria language, and publication status), and provide a
text.
rationale.
Describe all information sources in the search (e.g.,
Click here
Information databases with dates of coverage and contact with
7 to enter
sources* authors to identify additional sources), as well as the
text.
date the most recent search was executed.
 REPORT 3 2 1
ITE
SECTION PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM ED ON
M
PAGE #
Present the full electronic search strategy for at least Click here
Search 8 1 database, including any limits used, such that it to enter
could be repeated. text.
Selection of State the process for selecting sources of evidence Click here
sources of 9 (i.e., screening and eligibility) included in the to enter
evidence† scoping review. text.
Describe the methods of charting data from the
included sources of evidence (e.g., calibrated forms
Click here
Data charting or forms that have been tested by the team before
10 to enter
process‡ their use, and whether data charting was done
text.
independently or in duplicate) and any processes for
obtaining and confirming data from investigators.
List and define all variables for which data were Click here
Data items 11 sought and any assumptions and simplifications to enter
made. text.
Critical
If done, provide a rationale for conducting a critical
appraisal of Click here
individual appraisal of included sources of evidence; describe
12 to enter
sources of the methods used and how this information was
text.
evidence§ used in any data synthesis (if appropriate).
Click here
Synthesis of Describe the methods of handling and summarizing
13 to enter
results the data that were charted.
text.
RESULTS
Give numbers of sources of evidence screened,
Selection of Click here
assessed for eligibility, and included in the review,
sources of 14 to enter
with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally
evidence text.
using a flow diagram.
 REPORT 3 2 1
ITE
SECTION PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM ED ON
M
PAGE #
Characteristic For each source of evidence, present characteristics Click here
s of sources of 15 for which data were charted and provide the to enter
evidence citations. text.
Critical
Click here
appraisal If done, present data on critical appraisal of included
16 to enter
within sources sources of evidence (see item 12).
text.
of evidence
Results of
For each included source of evidence, present the Click here
individual
sources of 17 relevant data that were charted that relate to the to enter
evidence review questions and objectives. text.
Click here
Synthesis of Summarize and/or present the charting results as to enter
18
results they relate to the review questions and objectives. text.
DISCUSSION
Summarize the main results (including an overview
of concepts, themes, and types of evidence Click here
Summary of
19 available), link to the review questions and to enter
evidence
objectives, and consider the relevance to key text.
groups.
Click here
Discuss the limitations of the scoping review
Limitations 20 to enter
process.
text.
Provide a general interpretation of the results with Click here
Conclusions 21 respect to the review questions and objectives, as to enter
well as potential implications and/or next steps. text.
FUNDING
Click here
Describe sources of funding for the included sources
Funding 22 to enter
of evidence, as well as sources of funding for the
text.
 REPORT 3 2 1
ITE
SECTION PRISMA-ScR CHECKLIST ITEM ED ON
M
PAGE #
scoping review. Describe the role of the funders of
the scoping review.

TOTAL SKOR SECTION A (Max skor 63)

SECTION B Presentasi (Bobot 30%)

No Komponen Penilaian Skor 3 Skor 2 Skor 1 Perolehan Skor

1 Kemudahan untuk dibaca Ukuran dan Ukuran dan Slide terlalu sulit
banyaknya tulisan banyaknya tulisan untuk dibaca,
dan pemilihan font dan pemilihan font karena terlalu
yang mudah dibaca yang sulit dibaca banyak tulisan
2 Urutan slide Terstruktur dengan Kurang terstruktur Tidak terstruktur
baik dan logis dan tidak logis
3 Penggunaan media/alat bantu Menarik Kurang menarik Tidak menarik
presentasi menarik
4 Kejelasan Penyampaian jelas Penyampaian hanya Penyampaian tidak
penyajian/penyampaian dan menarik membaca slide menarik dan
sehingga kurang kurang jelas
menarik
5 Kemampuan menjawab dan Kelompok dapat Kelompok cukup Kelompok tidak
argumentasi menjawab dan dapat menjawab dapat menjawab
berargumen dengan dan kemampuan dan berargumen
baik berargumen cukup terhadap feedback/
baik pertanyaan yang
diberikan
 6 Keaktifan Presentasi dan tanya Presentasi dan Hanya sebagian
jawab aktif diikuti tanya jawab kecil anggota
oleh seluruh anggota didominasi oleh kelompok yang
kelompok (berperan) sebagian anggota berperan saat
kelompok (sebagian presentasi
anggota kelompok
berperan)
TOTAL SKOR SECTION B (Max skor 18)

Nilai= (7xskor A)+(3xskor B) =

4.95
Yogyakarta, ………………………………
Penguji