Response

Summary:

IPTeC TEACHING PORTFOLIO MIDPOINT REVIEW

Please note that this evaluation pertains to the participant's progress thus far with developing their teaching portfolio and
that the participant will need to update their portfolio with any additional teaching experiences in the remainder of the
IPTeC year prior to submitting their final portfolio.

Q2. Please enter the your name (teaching mentor):
Stephanie Enz

Q1. Please enter the participant's first and last name:
Sarah Wede

Q18. Please enter the participant's email (this will send a copy to them to confirm submission):
swede@butler.edu

Q3. Teaching Log Progress:
Is the teaching log updated by the participant as lectures or presentations are given? Does the participant
appear to be on target to complete the minimum requirements for IPTeC?

IPTeC Requirements:

Didactic (2 hours): instruction to health professionals and/or health professional students

Experiential (6 hours): APPE or IPPE rotation teaching through facilitation of or assessment of
learners delivering topic discussions, journal clubs, presentations, etc. **presenting to a preceptor
alone without learners does NOT count**
Precepting/co-precepting (6 hours): patient care discussions, patient care activities, project
management, etc.

On track to meet all IPTeC requirements

Q4. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching log:
Sarah has completed the didactic component and is in the process of completing the other requirements.

Q5. Teaching Philosophy:
The participant has developed a teaching philosophy that is clear, concise, and reflective. The participant
has considered his or her own personal approach to teaching and precepting.
Yes

Q6. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching philosophy:
Sarah has done an excellent job of creating a teaching philosophy.

Q7. Examples of Teaching:
The participant has included teaching materials (handouts, cases, presentations) that reflect his or her
teaching philosophy.
Yes

Q8. Mentor comments for the participant's teaching materials:
Sarah's examples of her teaching materials are excellent. Sarah and I talked about how well she organized her
material. She made her materials interactive, visually appealing, and not overly busy or wordy.

Q9. Feedback Regarding Teaching:
The participant includes feedback from lectures and presentations given from students, peers, and/or
preceptors.
Not included

Q10. Mentor comments for the participant's feedback:
Sarah will upload written comments and will solicit feedback from rotation students and will scan and upload the written
comments from her presentation.

Q11. Reflection of Teaching:
Provided self-reflection following each lecture highlighting areas that he or she did exceptionally well during
the lecture, as well as opportunities for improvement. If a lecture or presentation was repeated, did the
participant adequately reflect what was done differently to make the lecture successful?
Some improvement needed (detailed below)

Q12. Mentor comments for participant's reflection of teaching:
Sarah will continue to refine reflections and add to them now that we have met.

Q13. Portfolio Organization:
Is the portfolio organized in a clear and concise manner at this time?
Yes

Q14. Mentor comments for participant's portfolio organization:
Very well organized.

Embedded Data:
N/A