Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SEC-2 Democratic Awareness Through Legal Literacy
SEC-2 Democratic Awareness Through Legal Literacy
The Indian Constitution guarantees six types of fundamental rights, which are as follows:
Example: The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989, provides for strict punishment for offenses against members of these
communities.
Example: The Right to Information Act, 2005, enables citizens to access information from
public authorities, ensuring greater transparency and accountability.
Example: The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, prohibits the conversion
of any place of worship from one religion to any other religion.
Example: The National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions Act, 2004, aims
to safeguard the educational rights of minorities.
Example: The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been widely used as a tool to enforce
fundamental rights and bring social change.
1. To abide by the Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions (Article 51A(a)).
2. To cherish and follow the noble ideals which inspired our national struggle for freedom
(Article 51A(b)).
3. To uphold and protect the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India (Article 51A(c)).
4. To defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so (Article
51A(d)).
5. To promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of
India transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities; to renounce
practices derogatory to the dignity of women (Article 51A(e)).
6. To value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture (Article 51A(f)).
7. To protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers, and
wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures (Article 51A(g)).
8. To develop the scientific temper, humanism, and the spirit of inquiry and reform (Article
51A(h)).
9. To safeguard public property and to abjure violence (Article 51A(i)).
10. To strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the
nation constantly rises to higher levels of endeavor and achievement (Article 51A(j)).
11. To provide opportunities for education to his child or, as the case may be, ward between
the age of six and fourteen years (Article 51A(k)).
These fundamental duties are not legally enforceable and cannot be enforced through
the courts, but they are moral obligations that every citizen is expected to fulfill in the
interest of the nation and society.
Constitutional rights are those that are enshrined in a country's constitution and provide certain
protections and guarantees to its citizens. While some constitutional rights are considered
fundamental and are given a higher level of protection by the courts, others are not classified as
fundamental and may not be given the same level of protection.
1. Right to property: The right to own property was initially a fundamental right in the
Indian Constitution, but it was later removed and made a constitutional right under
Article 300A. However, it is not considered a fundamental right in India anymore.
2. Freedom of the press: While freedom of the press is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of
the Indian Constitution, it is not considered a fundamental right.
3. Right to form associations: The right to form associations is protected under Article
19(1)(c) of the Indian Constitution, but it is not considered a fundamental right.
4. Right to strike: The right to strike is protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian
Constitution, but it is not considered a fundamental right.
5. Right to education: While the right to education is recognized as a constitutional right in
India, it is not considered a fundamental right.
6. Right to privacy: The right to privacy was recognized as a constitutional right by the
Supreme Court of India in 2017, but it is not considered a fundamental right.
7. Right to health: While the right to health is recognized as a constitutional right in India,
it is not considered a fundamental right.
8. Right to clean environment: While the right to a clean environment is recognized as a
constitutional right in India, it is not considered a fundamental right.
9. Right to work: While the right to work is recognized as a constitutional right in India, it is
not considered a fundamental right.
10. Right to information: While the right to information is recognized as a constitutional
right in India, it is not considered a fundamental right.
Laws relating to dowry, sexual harassment and violence against women – laws
relating to consumer rights and cyber crimes
1. Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961: This law prohibits the giving or taking of dowry in India.
Dowry is a prevalent social evil in India, where the groom's family demands money, gifts,
or property from the bride's family at the time of marriage. The Dowry Prohibition Act
imposes penalties on those who demand or give dowry and provides protection to
women from harassment and violence related to dowry.
2. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: This law provides
protection to women who are victims of domestic violence. Domestic violence includes
physical, sexual, emotional, verbal, and economic abuse. The law provides for the right
to residence and maintenance for victims. It also recognizes the right of victims to
obtain protection orders, residence orders, and monetary reliefs.
3. The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal)
Act, 2013: This law prohibits sexual harassment of women at the workplace and provides
for redressal mechanisms for victims. The law defines sexual harassment and mandates
the formation of Internal Complaints Committees (ICCs) in workplaces. The law requires
all employers to provide a safe working environment for women and to take proactive
steps to prevent sexual harassment.
4. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC): The IPC and CrPC have
provisions for punishment for crimes against women, including rape, molestation, and
assault. These laws have been amended over time to strengthen the protection of
women from violence. In 2013, the IPC was amended to include stricter provisions for
rape, such as the death penalty for repeat offenders and for cases where the victim is
under 12 years of age.
In recent years, cyber crimes have become a growing concern with the increasing use of
technology and the internet. Several laws have been enacted to address cyber crimes
and protect the rights of individuals in cyberspace. Some of the key laws relating to
cyber crimes in India are:
1. The Information Technology Act, 2000: This law was enacted to provide legal
recognition to electronic transactions and to prevent cyber crimes. The law defines
various cyber offenses such as hacking, phishing, cyberstalking, and provides for
penalties for those who commit such offenses.
2. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC): The IPC and the
CrPC also provide for penalties for cyber crimes such as identity theft, cyber fraud, and
cyber stalking. These laws can be used in conjunction with the Information Technology
Act to prosecute cyber criminals.
3. The National Cyber Security Policy, 2013: This policy aims to protect the country's
cyberspace from cyber threats and attacks. It provides for the establishment of a
National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC) to protect critical
information infrastructure and to respond to cyber incidents.
4. The Cyber Appellate Tribunal: This tribunal was established under the Information
Technology Act, 2000, to hear appeals against decisions made by the Adjudicating
Officer under the Act. The tribunal has the power to hear and dispose of appeals against
orders passed by the Adjudicating Officer.
5. The Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services)
Act, 2016: This law provides for the establishment of a unique identification system
called Aadhaar. The law provides for penalties for those who misuse or disclose Aadhaar
data, and aims to protect the privacy of individuals.
6. The Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019: This bill, which is yet to be passed, aims to
protect the privacy of individuals and regulate the use of personal data. The bill provides
for penalties for those who violate its provisions and establishes a data protection
authority to oversee the implementation of the law.
India has a number of anti-terrorist laws that have been enacted to combat terrorism
and ensure national security. However, the implementation of these laws has often
come under scrutiny for their implications on human rights. Here are some specific
implications for security and human rights in the context of anti-terrorist laws in India:
1. Right to fair trial: Anti-terrorist laws may contain provisions that allow for the detention
of suspects without trial or the use of evidence obtained through torture. These
provisions can infringe upon an individual's right to a fair trial and due process. For
example, the UAPA allows for the detention of suspects without bail for up to 180 days.
2. Right to privacy: Anti-terrorist laws often include provisions for surveillance and
monitoring of individuals suspected of terrorism. These provisions can infringe upon an
individual's right to privacy and lead to indiscriminate surveillance. For example, the
Information Technology (Amendment) Act allows for the interception and monitoring of
electronic communication without a warrant.
3. Freedom of expression: Anti-terrorist laws may contain provisions that restrict freedom
of expression and association, which can have a chilling effect on civil society and
democratic values. For example, the UAPA criminalizes membership or support for a
terrorist organization, which could lead to the criminalization of legitimate dissent and
criticism.
4. Discrimination: Anti-terrorist laws can lead to discrimination against certain
communities, particularly those who are perceived to be associated with terrorism. This
can lead to the marginalization and stigmatization of these communities. For example,
the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA) was criticized for being used to target and arrest
members of the Muslim community in India.
In conclusion, while anti-terrorist laws are necessary to ensure national security and
prevent acts of terrorism, their implementation must be balanced with the protection of
human rights. The effectiveness of these laws in preventing terrorism must be weighed
against their impact on individual rights and liberties. Governments must ensure that
these laws are implemented in a manner that respects human rights and does not lead
to discrimination or abuse of power. In India, there is a need to review and amend
certain provisions of the existing anti-terrorist laws to ensure that they are in line with
international human rights standards.
System of courts/ tribunals and their jurisdiction in India – criminal and civil courts,
writ jurisdiction, specialized courts such as juvenile courts, Mahila courts and tribunals
Here is a detailed explanation of the system of courts and tribunals in India, including
their jurisdiction and functions, along with a diagram for better understanding:
High Courts
High Courts are located in each state of India and have appellate jurisdiction over the
subordinate courts of that state. They also have the power to issue writs such as habeas
corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari. High Courts are headed by
a Chief Justice.
District Courts
District Courts are the main trial courts in India and are located in each district. They
have jurisdiction over both civil and criminal cases. They are presided over by a District
Judge and have the power to award capital punishment in rare cases.
Civil Courts
Civil Courts have jurisdiction over disputes related to property, contracts, and other civil
matters. They are divided into three tiers: District Courts, Subordinate Courts, and Small
Causes Courts. Small Causes Courts have limited jurisdiction and deal with minor civil
cases.
Criminal Courts
Criminal Courts have jurisdiction over criminal cases such as theft, murder, and other
criminal offenses. They are also divided into three tiers: District Courts, Subordinate
Courts, and Magistrates' Courts.
Juvenile Courts
Juvenile Courts have jurisdiction over cases involving minors who are accused of
committing a crime. They have a separate set of rules and procedures to deal with such
cases. The aim of the Juvenile Court is to provide protection, care, and rehabilitation to
the juvenile offenders.
Family Courts
Family Courts have jurisdiction over cases related to family matters such as divorce, child
custody, and adoption. They also have the power to issue orders related to
maintenance, alimony, and property disputes. The objective of the Family Court is to
provide a quick and simple resolution to family disputes.
Mahila Courts
Mahila Courts or Women's Courts are specialized courts that deal with cases related to
violence against women, including domestic violence, sexual harassment, and dowry-
related offenses. These courts are established to provide a safe and comfortable
environment for women to seek justice.
Tribunals
Tribunals are specialized courts that have the power to hear and adjudicate cases
related to specific areas such as tax disputes, labor disputes, and environmental matters.
They are established to provide quick and efficient resolution to disputes.
Writ Jurisdiction
The Indian courts have the power of writ jurisdiction, which allows them to issue writs
such as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and certiorari. These writs
are used to protect individual rights and liberties and are an important aspect of the
Indian legal system.
Here is a diagram depicting the hierarchy and jurisdiction of the courts in India:
In conclusion, the Indian legal system has a comprehensive network of courts and
tribunals with specific jurisdiction and functions. The various courts and tribunals work
together to ensure that justice is served and individual rights are protected. The system
is constantly evolving to meet the changing needs of society and to ensure that justice
is accessible to all.
Here are some points about the alternate dispute resolution mechanisms in India:
1. Lok Adalats: Lok Adalats are an informal mechanism of dispute resolution where
disputes are resolved through mediation and conciliation. Lok Adalats are organized by
the government and are presided over by retired judges or other experienced lawyers.
The Lok Adalat has the power to settle disputes that are pending in court as well as
those that have not yet been filed in court. The decision of the Lok Adalat is final and
binding on both parties.
2. Mediation: Mediation is a non-binding process where a neutral third party helps the
parties to a dispute to reach a mutually agreeable solution. The mediator does not have
the power to make a decision, but facilitates the discussion between the parties to help
them reach a resolution.
3. Arbitration: Arbitration is a formal process of dispute resolution where the parties to a
dispute agree to refer the dispute to an arbitrator, who makes a binding decision.
Arbitration is commonly used in commercial disputes and is governed by the Arbitration
and Conciliation Act, 1996.
4. Conciliation: Conciliation is a voluntary process where the parties to a dispute work with
a neutral third party to reach a mutually agreeable solution. The conciliator does not
have the power to make a decision, but facilitates the discussion between the parties to
help them reach a resolution.
5. Negotiation: Negotiation is a process where the parties to a dispute work together to
reach a mutually agreeable solution without the involvement of a third party.
Negotiation can be informal or formal and can take place at any stage of the dispute.
6. Gram Nyayalayas: Gram Nyayalayas are rural courts established to provide easy access
to justice to people living in rural areas. These courts are presided over by a judge who
is a qualified legal practitioner and have the power to hear civil and criminal cases.
7. Ombudsman: An ombudsman is an independent official who investigates complaints
against government officials and departments. The ombudsman is appointed by the
government and has the power to investigate complaints and make recommendations
for corrective action.
8. Family courts: Family courts are specialized courts that deal with matters related to
family law such as divorce, child custody, and domestic violence. These courts are
presided over by a judge who is a qualified legal practitioner and have the power to
hear civil cases related to family law.
9. Labour courts: Labour courts are specialized courts that deal with matters related to
labour law such as disputes between employers and employees. These courts are
presided over by a judge who is a qualified legal practitioner and have the power to
hear civil cases related to labour law.