JOB HAZARD ANALYSIS

Tools and or Equipment

Division Office / Project: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT required: ID No:

Job Location: Date Prepared:

JOB/ACTIVITY/OPERATION:

Approved by PM:

Responsible Supervisor: ENGR. (NAME) ENGR. JOSEPH NATHAN B. MARQUEZ

Date:
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION
JOB STEP EXISTING & POTENTIAL HAZARD RISK RATING (Eg, Using the risk (Eg. Remove overhead cable or isolate/sheath
(Eg. Set Up Crane) (Eg. Electrocution from 11Kv Cables) assessment matrix- Low, Medium, High. ) overhead or monitor with a spotter) Training PPE
Needs

Mar 2022 Page 1 of 5 BOSH

INSTRUCTIONS.
1. Please refer to pages 5 and 6 for your names with the corresponding Job/Operation/Activity that will be the basis of your Job Hazard
Analysis.
2. The guidelines of your JHA are on page 4 of this file. Kindly read it carefully and understand it.
3. Submit your output in a separate file in our Google Classroom.
4. Submission is on May 12, 2023, at 11:59 pm ONLY. Late submission will have a grade of 78.
5. This will be your Final Exam so take it seriously and comply.
6. GOODLUCK ENGINEERS!

RUBRICS

Scale
Criteria
Criteria Weight Excellent Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Good Fair Poor
Rating
(6) (5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

The student acquired The student The student acquired The student The student The student acquired
completely relevant acquired to a great to some extent of acquired little acquired very little no relevant
information for the extent of relevant relevant information relevant information relevant information information for the
1. Know development of information to the to the development of for the for the development of
15% *
ledge understanding of the development of understanding of the development of development of understanding of the
given problems. understanding of the given problems. understanding of understanding of given problems.
given problems. the given problems. the given problems.

Demonstrates deep Demonstrates a lot Demonstrates a little Demonstrates very Barely Demonstrates no
analytical processing of analytical analytical processing little analytical demonstrates analytical processing
of information and can processing of of information and processing of analytical of information and
perform with a lot of information and can can perform with information and can processing of can perform with
competence perform with some some competence perform with some information and can some competence
2. Skill processes, i.e., competence processes, i.e., competence perform with some processes, i.e.,
or interpret; translate; processes, i.e., interpret; translate; processes, i.e., competence interpret; translate;
25% *
Proce convert or express the interpret; translate; convert or express interpret; translate; processes, i.e., convert or express
ss information given in convert or express the information given convert or express interpret; translate; the information given
the problem into a the information in the problem into a the information convert or express in the problem into a
required output given in the problem required output given in the the information required output
specification. into a required specification. problem into a given in the specification.
output specification. required output problem into a
specification.
Mar 2022 Page 2 of 5 BOSH
 required output
specification.

Demonstrates deep Demonstrates fair Demonstrates little Demonstrates very Barely Demonstrates
understanding of the understanding of the understanding of the little understanding demonstrates an negligible
situation in the given situation in the given situation in the given of the situation in understanding of understanding of the
3. problem by using problem by using problem by using the given problem the situation in the situation in the given
Understa 30% relevant and accurate relevant and relevant and accurate by using relevant given problem by problem by using *
nding detail in the accurate detail in the detail in the and accurate detail using relevant and relevant and accurate
application. application. application. in the application. accurate detail in detail in the
the application. application.

The student The student The student strives in The student shows The student shows The student shows a
demonstrates moderately using logical and/or inadequacy in the difficulty in lot of difficulties in
4. effectively the ability in demonstrates the technical skills in using logical and/or using logical and/or using logical and/or
Transfer using logical and/or ability in using producing the technical skills in technical skills in technical skills in
of 30% technical skills in logical and/or required output producing the producing the producing the *
Understa producing the required technical skills in specification. required output required output required output
nding output specification. producing the specification. specification. specification.
required output
specification.
Total
Total 100%
Rating

Legend: * - Criteria Rating = (Scale Value / 6) * Weight

Total Rating - Sum of Criteria Rating

At least 60 % of the students obtain a grade of 80% and above.

Mar 2022 Page 3 of 5 BOSH

RISK ASSESSMENT MATRIX Step 1. Identify the Basic Job Steps -Watch carefully as a worker performs
the entire job at least once (watch videos from YouTube and at least 3 - 5 major
steps).
1) As the operator performs the job again, list the individual steps on the left-
hand column.
2) Using simple action phrases that are short and to the point
3) Steps should always be numbered to indicate the order

Step 2. Determine the Existing & Potential Hazards: - Identify all of the
existing or potential actions or conditions that could lead to an injury or illness,
or harm to the environment.
Hazard Guide:
1) The method or physical actions required for that specific step.
2) The materials used.
3) The machine/equipment used.
4) The environmental conditions under which the step is normally performed.

Step 3. Identify the Risk Rating using the Risk Assessment Matrix (on the
left)
a. Probability- Low, Medium, High
b. Severity – Low, Medium, High

Step 4. Recommend Corrective Actions

A. Engineering Control
B. Administrative Control
C. PPE

Mar 2022 Page 4 of 5 BOSH

 NAME OPERATION/JOB/ACTIVITY
1. Abonita, Ella Mae A. 1. REPAIRING HIGH VOLTAGE WIRES
2. Aguila, Flora May P. 2. RAISING DRUMS FROM THE GROUND
3. PESTICIDES HANDLING
3. Balbuena, Jerald R.
4. OBJECT AN LIFTING
4. Barbero, John Mark O. 5. MAINTAIN LIGHT FIXTURES
5. Belgrado, Gemmalyn C. 6. LOW HEAD CLEARANCE
6. Bermido, Alvi John M. 7. TORSO/FULL BODY INJURY
7. Bornasal, Ace York A. 8. SOLDERING
9. SITTING POSTURE
8. Bucad, Caira Mae M.
10. SHOVELING
9. Cortan, Ronnie Jr. M. 11. SCAFFOLDINGS ERECTION
10. Desquitado, John Therence 12. LIFTING SHEET MATERIALS
N. 13. LIFTING COMPACT LOAD
11. Dollero, Karen 14. KITCHEN
12. Dotillos, Teddy S. 15. WORKING IN HIGH PLACES
16. ELECTRIC ARC WELDING
13. Ducado, Anjelo C. 17. DIGGING
14. Gabarda, Rey Angelo D. 18. BUSTED LIGHTBULB
15. Galon, John Angelo Q. 19. WORKING WITH RECIPROCATING
16. Garcia, Gerald S. MACHINES
17. Herrera, Reidge Russell N. 20. WASTE DISPOSAL
21. VERTICAL PUSHING OR PULLING AN
18. Landong, Earl S. OBJECT
19. Laynes, Dominic T. 22. USING A ROLLING PLATFORM
20. Malapo, Ramil D. 23. USING A PALLET JACK
21. Martinez, Bernadette J. 24. BLAST FURNACE OPERATION
25. BENCH GRINDING
22. Piano, John Michael S.
26. HORIZONTAL PUSHING OR PULLING
23. Ramos, Angela Joy S. OF AN OBJECT
24. Rapelo, Mary Rose R. 27. HANDLING OF HIGHLY FLAMMABLE
25. Razon, Arjay T 28. HANDLING HIGHLY COMBUSTIBLE
26. Realin, Jericho P MATERIALS
29. HAND DRILLING
27. Reciproco, Airec Rosel M.
30. FIRE EXTINGUISHER STORING
28. Regaspi, Alvin B.
29. Romano, Charity Anne O.
30. Zerda, Chester Vince R.

Mar 2022 Page 5 of 5 BOSH