ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES

12 ABM A

MODULE 1

POST TEST
1. The main idea of the manifesto on the module is about the current
protocols for covid 19 given by interior Secretary Eduardo Ano where
he said that there is no need to present the swab tests when
returning to provinces.

2. Quoted Statement from an interview.

- In this manifesto, the quoted statement from Ano’s interview is
included so we can be assured that the statements in this
manifesto are all facts.
Clarification of the interviewer
- There is a clarification in this manifesto so that people would not
misunderstand information given.

B. Goal
The manifesto is about not needing to present the results of their covid-19
swab test before returning to provinces. A goal can be a manifesto when
we share it with other people. It’s for the public, it’s a declaration and it’s
about what we intend to have happen.

ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL PURPOSES

12 ABM A

MODULE 2
POST TEST
DEATH PENALTY
The death penalty is the execution of an offender sentenced to death by a
court of law after being convicted of a criminal offense. Extrajudicial executions
should be distinguished from capital punishment. Capital punishment is also a
legal penalty under the federal government's criminal justice system in the United
States. It can be imposed in certain cases for treason, espionage, murder, large-
scale drug trafficking, or attempted murder of a witness, juror, or court officer.
Here are three arguments for the death penalty. First, the concept of "retribution"
is the idea that punishment is imposed because it is deserved. One of the
evidence’s given by a philosopher, murderers will face the death penalty because
that is the punishment for their crime. According to the philosopher Immanuel
Kant, retribution is founded on respect for the offender's autonomy. This
evidence answered question how does retribution support’s death penalty. There
is another evidence in history that retribution is not a solution to death penalty. In
1990, one of the suspects in a murder case was sentenced to death, but within
five years, the suspect was proven innocent. So many people do not believe on
that process of redemption. Another claims or argument in capital punishment is
“deterrence, Deterrence is probably the most commonly expressed rationale for
death penalty. Others believe that deterrence works, but there is no credible
evidence that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than long prison
sentences. Another evidence under President Marcos, the official justification for
the death penalty became one of deterrence, and its application was heavily
influenced by a backdrop of escalating political tensions. By 1969, public
opposition to the Marcos regime had grown, contributing to the formation of the
Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, the New People's
Army (NPA), by a Maoist-oriented faction of the old PKP. The last argument I
know is what we called “Rehabilitation” this is the most recently formulated theory
of punishment. The idea that the purpose of punishment is to apply treatment
and training to the offender so that he is made capable of returning to society and
functioning as a law-abiding member of the community. There is a evidence that
rehabilitation reduces crime and can be cost effective. Economic analysis
therefore, reinforces the idea that the punishment is not the best solution for
reducing the harmful impact of crime. Another evidence is between 2009 and
2019, the number of rehabilitative courses to tackle general offending that were
started and completed fell 62% despite the prison population increasing
significantly in this time.

BUSINESS ETHICS & SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

12 ABM A
I. MULTIPLE CHOICE
1. A 11. B
2. C 12. A
3. A 13. D
4. C 14. B
5. C 15. C
6. A 16. B
7. D 17. C
8. C 18. B
9. D 19. D
10. D 20. D

II. EXPLAIN ME!

A.
A leading model of CSR is Carroll's four-part pyramid. The CSR pyramid was
framed to embrace the entire spectrum of society's expectations of business
responsibilities and define them in terms of categories. According to the model, four
kinds of social responsibilities constitute total CSR: economic (“make profit”), legal
(“obey the law”), ethical (“be ethical”), and philanthropic (“be a good corporate citizen”).
According to Carroll, the use of a pyramid to depict the conceptual model of CSR is
intended “to portray that the total CSR of business comprises distinct components that,
taken together, constitute the whole. ”The model categorizes the different
responsibilities hierarchically in order of decreasing importance. The most fundamental
is economic responsibility, “all other business responsibilities are predicated upon the
economic responsibility of the firm, because without it the others become moot
considerations.

B.
Schwartz and Carroll's three-domain model as a recent example of the IC
approach to CSR that stands in sharp contrast to the pyramid insofar as its conceptual
structure is concerned. Schwartz and Carroll's new model of CSR (and see the
comparison with Jones's model below) is an attempt to develop the CSR domains “more
completely both in terms of what each means or implies and in terms of the overlapping
categories that are identified when the three domains are depicted in a Venn diagram
format. ”Unfortunately, their use of a three-circle Venn diagram to amend the difficulties
inherent in the pyramid model introduced new difficulties that undermine its ability to
provide a proper conceptualization of CSR.

C.
The concentric-circle (CON) model (Figure 1c) is similar to the pyramid in that it
views the economic role of business as its core social responsibility, and similar to the
IC model in that it emphasizes the interrelationships among the different corporate
social responsibilities. But underlying these similarities are essential differences in the
very definitions of the corporate responsibilities.