Crim Law 2 Case Digest

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Criminal Law 2 – Assignment 01

Grace Dela Rama, JD1-A

People vs. Manayao


G.R. No. L-322, July 28, 1947

Facts:
On or about the 27th of January, 1944, the guerillas raided the Japanese in sitio Pulong
Tindahan, municipality of Angat, Province of Bulacan. In revenge, Japanese soldiers and several Filipinos
affiliated with the Makapili, including Pedro Manayao, conceived the diabolical idea of killing the
residents of barrio Banaban the same municipality. Pursuant to this plan, said Japanese soldiers and
their Filipino companions, armed with rifles and bayonets, gathered residents of Banaban behind the
barrio chapel on January 29, 1945. About sixty or seventy, the residents thus assembled included men,
women and children — mostly women.
Separating the children from the group of men and women, the Japanese and their Filipino
Comrades set the surrounding houses on fire and proceeded to butcher killing them. Appellant alone
killed about six women, two of whom were his relatives, he bayoneted to death in the presence of
their daughters. He would have killed the children too, however the Japanese soldiers, interceded,
saying that the children knew nothing of the matter.

Issues:
Whether the court has jurisdiction to try the case as the accused claimed that he loses his
Filipino citizenship being a member of Makapili.
Whether the accused is guilty of the crime treason.

Ruling:
Yes, the court has jurisdiction to try the case. The court held that being a member the Makapili,
although organized to render military aid to the Japanese Army in the Philippines during the late war,
was not a part of said army. It was an organization of Filipino traitors, pure and simple. His oath as a
Makapili member that he will help Japan in its fight against Americans does not equate to an oath of
allegiance to the support the constitution or laws of Japan. There is also no evidence that he accepted a
commission “in the military, naval, or air service” of Japan.
Furthermore, the contention that as a member of the Makapili accused had to obey his
Japanese masters underpain of severe penalty, and that therefore his acts should be considered as
committed under the impulse of an irresistible force or uncontrollable fear of an equal or greater injury,
is no less repulsive. Accused voluntarily joined the Makapili with full knowledge of its avowed purpose of
rendering military aid to Japan. He knew the consequences to be expected — if the alleged irresistible
force or uncontrollable fear subsequently arose, he brought them about himself freely and voluntarily.
Thus, the accused is guilty of the crime of treason with multiple murder committed with the
attendance of one aggravating circumstance, that of "armed band."

You might also like