Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

20/03/2023, 16:43 David Hume’s Guide to Social Media | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review

THR WEB FEATURES   /   MARCH 15, 2023

David Hume’s Guide to Social Media


Emancipation by the cultivation of taste.
Alan Jacobs

ALAN JACOBS
CATEGORIES
Essays
RELATED TOPICS
Technology
Self

In a recent Substack post, free-range social critic Freddie deBoer asked, “Are smartphones to blame for
the mental health crisis among teens?” He is far from alone in asking that, of course, but what he said
next grabbed my attention:

The debate has picked up steam lately, in part because of the steady accumulation of
evidence that they are indeed, at least partially…. Jonathan Haidt has done
considerable work marshaling this evidence. But there’s an attendant question of how
phones make kids miserable, if indeed they do.

The important issue, then, is what exactly smartphones are doing to teens that makes them so
miserable? DeBoer’s answers are quite good—I especially welcome his emphasis on the misery of
being constantly bombarded by images of lives none of us can actually live—but I think we can

https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/david-humes-guide-to-social-media 1/4
20/03/2023, 16:43 David Hume’s Guide to Social Media | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review

significantly deepen our understanding of these matters by turning to an account of human behavior
offered by the philosopher David Hume nearly three centuries ago. Hume begins his first book, A
Treatise of Human Nature (1740), with this assertion:

All the perceptions of the human mind resolve themselves into two distinct kinds,
which I shall call IMPRESSIONS and IDEAS. The difference betwixt these consists
in the degrees of force and liveliness, with which they strike upon the mind, and make
their way into our thought or consciousness. Those perceptions, which enter with most
force and violence, we may name impressions; and under this name I comprehend all
our sensations, passions and emotions, as they make their first appearance in the soul.
By ideas I mean the faint images of these in thinking and reasoning; such as, for
instance, are all the perceptions excited by the present discourse, excepting only, those
which arise from the sight and touch, and excepting the immediate pleasure or
uneasiness it may occasion.

From this point, Hume goes on to make a great many distinctions, but here I want to focus on just a
few of them. Setting aside Ideas for now, let us turn to Impressions:

Original impressions or impressions of sensation are such as without any antecedent


perception arise in the soul, from the constitution of the body, from the animal spirits,
or from the application of objects to the external organs. Secondary, or reflective
impressions are such as proceed from some of these original ones, either immediately
or by the interposition of its idea. Of the first kind are all the impressions of the senses,
and all bodily pains and pleasures: Of the second are the passions, and other emotions
resembling them.

From these reflections, then, I have derived my thesis: The effect of our smartphones on our mind—as
those devices are typically used—is to suppress wholly the realm of Ideas, and to suppress greatly the
“impressions of the senses,” and instead to stir the passions.

Why this matters is something Hume explains in an essay he wrote just after finishing his Treatise,
called “Of the Delicacy of Taste and Passion.” That essay begins thus:

https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/david-humes-guide-to-social-media 2/4
20/03/2023, 16:43 David Hume’s Guide to Social Media | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review

Some people are subject to a certain delicacy of passion, which makes them extremely
sensible to all the accidents of life, and gives them a lively joy upon every prosperous
event, as well as a piercing grief, when they meet with misfortunes and adversity.

It is the purpose of our smartphones, and especially the social media apps installed on them, to make
us this kind of person. And if our time on our devices gave us as much “lively joy” as “piercing grief,”
then perhaps that would not be so bad. But as Hume goes on to explain, that’s not how it works:

Good or ill fortune is very little at our disposal: And when a person, that has this
sensibility of temper, meets with any misfortune, his sorrow or resentment takes entire
possession of him, and deprives him of all relish in the common occurrences of life; the
right enjoyment of which forms the chief part of our happiness. Great pleasures are
much less frequent than great pains; so that a sensible temper must meet with fewer
trials in the former way than in the latter. Not to mention, that men of such lively
passions are apt to be transported beyond all bounds of prudence and discretion, and to
take false steps in the conduct of life, which are often irretrievable.

It is difficult to imagine a more vivid and accurate portrayal of someone consumed by Instagram envy
or Twitter doomscrolling.

But what is to be done? How are people who have (intentionally or unintentionally) developed this
“sensibility of temper” to resist it, to reclaim their very selves from its power over them? Hume has an
answer to that question, too. It lies in the concept he places in contrast to “delicacy of passion.” He
calls it “delicacy of taste.”

In one sense, Hume acknowledges, the two dispositions are similar: “Delicacy of taste has the same
effect as delicacy of passion: It enlarges the sphere both of our happiness and misery, and makes us
sensible to pains as well as pleasures, which escape the rest of mankind.” Yet he goes on to argue that
“delicacy of taste is as much to be desired and cultivated as delicacy of passion is to be lamented.” How
so? Hume’s distinction begins with this simple but profound point: “The good or ill accidents of life
are very little at our disposal; but we are pretty much masters [of ] what books we shall read, what
diversions we shall partake of, and what company we shall keep.” This matters because

https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/david-humes-guide-to-social-media 3/4
20/03/2023, 16:43 David Hume’s Guide to Social Media | THR Web Features | Web Features | The Hedgehog Review

every wise man will endeavour to place his happiness on such objects chiefly as depend
upon himself: and that is not to be attained so much by any other means as by this
delicacy of sentiment. When a man is possessed of that talent, he is more happy by
what pleases his taste, than by what gratifies his appetites, and receives more
enjoyment from a poem or a piece of reasoning than the most expensive luxury can
afford.

Or the shiniest Instagram post, for that matter.

Again, there is both simplicity and profundity here. By setting ourselves to cultivate a taste for what is
beautiful and wise—and such taste does indeed require cultivation, being neither innate nor instantly
grasped—we gradually emancipate ourselves from the power of others who would act upon us, which
is to say, from the passions they seek to intensify in us. “And,” Hume continues

this is a new reason for cultivating a relish in the liberal arts. Our judgment will
strengthen by this exercise: We shall form juster notions of life: Many things, which
please or afflict others, will appear to us too frivolous to engage our attention: And we
shall lose by degrees that sensibility and delicacy of passion, which is so
incommodious.

Imagine that: Many things, which please or afflict others, will appear to us too frivolous to engage our
attention. The cultivation of taste, in morals as well as in art, is neither snobbish nor elitist; it is, rather,
the key means by which we emancipate ourselves from the tyranny of passions that the people who
make our smartphone apps would like to see dominate us. By cultivating “delicacy of taste,” we become
less vulnerable, less manipulable; and as the world of the passions ceases to dominate us, the great
domains of Sensation and Idea become available to us once more. If there is a better guide to our
current technocratic moment than David Hume, born 310 years ago, I don’t know who it is.

https://hedgehogreview.com/web-features/thr/posts/david-humes-guide-to-social-media 4/4

You might also like