Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NPS Interpretation Lesson Plan
NPS Interpretation Lesson Plan
- Tell the group what is to be presented is offered as a tool. This model does not measure
interpretation, nor is it a "how to." Tools such as "Themes, Goals, Objectives," are
separate and very important. This model attempts to describe effective interpretive
products. Learners are welcome to use or not use this tool as they see fit.
- Ask participants to "forget" their own descriptions of interpretation for the duration of the
session and "try this one on for size."
1. - Ask "Why do we have parks at all?" Should receive a variety of responses such as -
"To preserve our heritage," "Because they have national significance," "Because they are
special." Instructor should validate these responses, but challenge participants to go for
the even more fundamental reason - that all parks have meanings.
- Point out plural in meanings. Ask, "Does any given park mean the same thing to all
people?" The group will say no.
- Are those meanings attached to or inherent in the place? Do those meanings transcend
the place? What does the place have to do with the meanings? Abraham Lincoln said it
best in the Gettysburg Address:"But in a larger sense we can not dedicate--we can not
consecrate--we can not hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who
struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world
will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but can never forget what they did
here."
- One could say, according to Lincoln, Gettysburg could be paved and the sacrifice,
tragedy, heroism, and valor of the men who served there--the meanings of the place--
would not change a bit. Ask "Why then save the place?"
- Resources are icons, portals, platforms, wormholes, tangible places that help people
connect to larger meanings. One might read all about a battlefield or all about an
ecosystem but will have a singularly different experience when visiting the resource.
2. - Ask, "Why do people come to parks?" Again, will receive a variety of responses that
represent a continuum of motivations from those seeking entertainment to those on a
pilgrimage. It should be relatively simple to validate each and steer to the common
definition that the visitor is seeking something of value for themselves.
3. - Ask, "What is the job of interpretation?" Participants will most likely respond, "To
connect the two."
- The visitor is sovereign. To be effective, the interpreter must meet the visitor on their own
terms.
- Meanings are more important than information. Interpreters use information to reveal
meanings, but it is not the goal of interpretation to fill the visitor's mind with information,
facts, or detail. Interpretation is successful if, no matter the depth of information provided,
the visitor finds significant meaning in the resource.
- Interpreters must be able to subordinate their own passion and understandings of the
resource so that visitors can form their own passion and understanding.
- When a connection between the interests of the visitor and the meanings of the resource
is made, care for the resource is cultivated. Visitors must come to care about a resource
before they choose to support its preservation. The implication is that if an interpreter
preaches preservation without first facilitating a connection between the resource and the
visitor, most likely the effort will fail.
2. - Ask, "What's the difference between these two charts?" Of course the answer will be
tangibles and intangibles.
- Tell them that all of interpretation is right there. All of interpretation is taking a tangible
resource and connecting it to its broader meanings or intangible resources.
- When we take a tangible thing, we have an opening or portal for meaning. If we connect
that thing to an intangible resource, we begin to illuminate the relevance of the thing.
3. - Draw a horizontal line (x axis) on the flipchart and label it "Tangible: Information,
Narrative, Chronology"
- Ask, "How many interpretive programs stay on this line?" Can use the example of living
history, full of vibrant tangibles, but often gets bogged down in the description of buttons
and stitch counts. Can also use the metaphor of blueprints - full of important information,
but will move the soul of very few people.
4. - Draw a vertical line (y axis) to the horizontal line and label it "Intangible: Meanings"
- How many interpretive programs stay on this line, full of abstractions and/or emotions
that don't connect to the tangible resource? Can use the example abstract art--again,
speaks to a minority of people.
- Good interpretation requires these to be linked -- can't effectively have one without the
other. The tangible/information provides the hook and the foundation while the
intangible/meanings provide the relevance and source for care.
5. - Ask, "Can you think of any examples of tangible/intangible links?" Monuments are
excellent examples, so are obvious geologic features. Just cull out or point out a few to
gauge comprehension and begin to deepen the concept.
Model: 5 Minutes
- Present a short interpretive model that clearly illustrates tangible/intangible linkages. The
model could be a talk, but might be a piece of interpretive media. Short and clear is best
when introducing the concept.
1. - Have participants identify the tangible used in the model. It is easy to get confused
and focus on tangibles that are used as interpretive tools or techniques rather than as the
platform or icon of the product. Have participants identify the intangibles they experienced
in the product.
2. - Show pre-drawn chart for interpretive model. Make sure it is simple and clear.
Describe how the chart assumes the interpretive product is reaching for a cumulative
effect on the audience. The horizontal axis should be marked "Tangible: Information,
Chronology, Narrative" as well as "Time." The vertical axis should be marked "Intangible:
Meanings" as well as "Relevance to the Audience." Emphasize the chart describes
interpretive product--it does not measure product, nor does it take the place of the tools
and techniques required to develop product. This graph is useful for developing
interpretive products only in that it helps describe the vision of the interpreter. The
interpretive product and graph should grow and change as the product is developed.
3. - Ask audience to describe theme. Some might come close, but certainly will have a
variety of answers. Ask if the imprecision of answers mean the theme has failed. Most
likely, the participants will answer "no." Why then have themes? Themes are tools, like
many other tools, needed to develop products. Successful products do not obviously
reveal the tools that make them successful.
4. - Describe how the audience each could have a graph that plots their reaction to the
interpretive product. Emphasize that differences in charts are not important, as long as
audience members were connected to the meanings of the resource.
- Don't get hung up on the words. They don't have to be defined precisely. They are meant
to be useful tools, not rules. Some synonyms: things/big ideas, real/conceptual,
symbols/meanings, stuff/glue.
- Tangible and intangible are two groupings for the specific resources at a given site. Good
interpretation will require the learner to identify those resources.
- Have group brainstorm the "meanings" of an ordinary object like a beer bottle.
Encourage as many different meanings and points of view as possible.
1. - Ask, "Are all tangible/intangible linkages equally effective? Do all linkages have the
same power for the same people?" They will likely answer "no." Ask why and try to direct
the discussion to the differences between links that lead to further information, and those
that lead to something more broadly meaningful.
- An example might be helpful. A pottery shard can represent the entire system of
archeology or the entire culture of a people--or both--depending on how the interpreter
uses it.
2. - Introduce Universal Concepts. Universal Concepts are intangibles that relate to almost
everyone in some way. Family is an excellent example. Family means different things to
almost everyone, but family still is a relevant concept to almost everyone. An example of a
universal concept from the previous model product would be most effective here.
3. - Have participants list additional universal concepts. Discuss them and place them on
the flipchart as they are suggested. Make sure some challenging ones like God are
included.
- Again, make point that the actual categorization of universals should not be argued over
at this point. Each interpreter is free to have their own list of universal concepts--some will
simply be more effective than others. At this point, arguing over categorization will distract
from understanding that some concepts are more relevant to more people than others.
4. Describe Tilden's principle regarding the need for relevance. Describe "little r"
relevance where the interpreter refers to some commonly understood object or place in
order to communicate more effectively. Encourage this as an interpretive technique. Then
describe "Big R" relevance as being the universal concepts described above. This level of
relevance is what Tilden refers to and is laden with meaning.
5. Suggest participants make lists of tangibles, intangibles, and universal concepts at their
own resource. These lists can be used during research and site exploration to cultivate
ideas for interpretive products. When the interpreter finds meaning in the resource, they
must simply identify the tangibles, intangibles, and universal concepts associated with that
discovery. A couple of examples illustrating this might be helpful.
- Divide into small groups and give each an object. Have them discuss and identify the
tangible/intangible linkages and possible universal concepts for that object.
- Have the groups report back and open discussion for additional ideas and linkages.
Assignment
- Choose a tangible object that somehow represents you resource. It might be easiest to
focus on a specific object like a seed or a tree rather than a forest.
- Identify six linkages that object has to the intangible resources at your site. At least two
of them should be universal concepts. Your assignment can be typed or handwritten and
should be lengthy enough to communicate the linkages. Some linkages will be very
obvious and will be understood with a word or two. Others may take greater description.
The whole assignment should not take more than two pages--probably much less.
PLEASE DO NOT WRITE DOWN A TALK OR PROGRAM.