Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPEC NEEDS Protective Stabilization
SPEC NEEDS Protective Stabilization
SPEC NEEDS Protective Stabilization
247
PROTECTIVE STABILIZATION IN THE DENTAL SETTING CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING USE OF PROTECTIVE STABILIZATION
1. Alternative behavior guidance techniques that could
be used instead.
PROTECTIVE STABILIZATION - We don't use Protective Stabilization when
- the restriction of a patient's freedom of movement, other guidance techniques can still be used
with or without the patient's permission, to decrease 2. The child's oral health needs.
risk of injury while allowing safe completion of - Is there an urgent need or not?
treatment - Is it extensive?
- Other terms for Protective Stabilization: 3. The length and invasiveness of the procedure
- Restrictive behavior guidance technique 4. The effect of this technique on the quality of oral
- Medical Immobilization health care
5. The child's emotional and cognitive developmental
OBJECTIVES FOR APPLYING PROTECTIVE STABILIZATION levels
1. Reduce or eliminate sudden, uncontrolled, or 6. The child's medical and physical condition
aggressive movement of the child's head, jaw, body or 7. The oral health professional's comfort with, and skill
limbs in, using these techniques
2. Provide stability for the child in the dental chair 8. Parents understanding and acceptance of their use
3. Protect the child and oral health staff from injury
4. Facilitate delivery of quality oral health procedure PRECAUTIONS
5. Protective stabilization should be reserved for only the ● Review medical history and past history of the patient
most serious problem behavior, and it should only be ● Constant monitoring
used after less restrictive procedures are shown to be ● Stabilization around extremities or the chest must not
ineffective and in conjunction with other proactive actively restrict circulation or respiration
therapies ● Observation of body language and pain assessment
stabilization should be terminated as soon as possible
“You have to remember that our convenience should in a patient who is experiencing severe stress or
never be part of our objectives.” hysterics to prevent possible physical or psychological
trauma.
INDICATIONS
1. The child requires immediate diagnosis and/or urgent ENVIRONMENT
limited treatment and cannot cooperate due to ● Protective stabilization should be used in an
emotional maturity or medical and physical conditions. environment of family and caregiver involvement, and
2. Emergency care is needed and uncontrolled most parents feel they should be present to increase
movements risk the safety of the child, staff, dentist, the child’s stability and comfort.
or parent without the use of protective stabilization; ● While parental presence and involvement should be
3. A previously cooperative child quickly becomes encouraged, parents should not be made to feel guilty
uncooperative during the appointment in order to if they do not want to be present.
protect his/her safety and help to expedite completion ○ If they choose to be absent, it should be
of treatment. documented.
○ But if the treatment is not urgent, then you ● If parents are denied access, they must be informed
can actually defer the treatment. of the reason, and the rationale must be documented
4. A child is sedated and becomes uncooperative during in the patient’s chart.
treatment
5. A child with special health care needs who may DOCUMENTATION
experience uncontrolled movements that would be 1. Type of stabilization used
harmful or significantly interfere with the quality of 2. Indication for stabilization
care
INFORMED CONSENT
● Protective stabilization should only be used when
1. Signed by the parents/guardian
necessary to protect the individual and others during
- The process of informed consent is an
a dental appointment and should not be used for
ethical obligation and a legal requirement
coercion, convenience, or punishment
that goes beyond a signature on a consent
form
CONTRAINDICATIONS - In the case of protective stabilization, it is
● A cooperative non-sedated patient. advisable to obtain specific, written informed
- We usually use Protective Stabilization when consent
the child is sedated, we seldom use it if the 2. Duration of stabilization
child is non-sedated. 3. Reason for parent exclusion during stabilization (if
● An uncooperative patient when there is not a clear applicable)
need to provide treatment at that particular visit - Example: If the parent is highly anxious you
● A patient who cannot be immobilized safely due to request the patient to be excluded in the
associated medical, psychological or physical stabilization
conditions 4. Behavior evaluation/ rating during stabilization
● A patient with a history of physical or psychological - Frankl behavior
trauma - Rate how much movement
● Non-emergent treatment needs - If there is an interruption in the treatment
● A practitioner's convenience even with the stabilization
● Dental team without proper training
Dental Care for Children with Special Needs, p. 247
5. Any untoward outcome, such as skin markings, and chair, but it may be used for older CSHCN when
management implications for future appointments patient size permits safe positioning
- Even if it’s very mild, you have to note (Ex. A
light scratch; you still have to note it and
where)
2. CHEMICAL
CONCLUSION
● Protective stabilization can be a useful adjunct to
other behavior guidance techniques or a last resort
when they fail.
● Due to the history of the improper use of restraint in
individuals with CSHCN, dentists should understand
the rationale behind protective stabilization in
dentistry and indications for its use.
● Proper informed consent and documentation are
essential when implementing protective stabilization.