Essay (~210 words)

Today, are many zoos where lots of animals live. Is it better for they in zoos or in
natural environment? Most people don't even think that animals could be in awful
conditions, have a bad accomodation, tasteless and flavourless food, but is it so?
On the one hand, some supporters of animals at least have two main arguments
against animals in the zoo. First of all, the animals suffer from stress and depression,
while they are transported to a zoo or even when visitors are looking at the animals in
enclosure. For instance, lots of cries, noise and flashes from the phone are scare an
animal.
Secondly, the animals could live in terrible conditions because worker don't use
enough time and money to make a comfortable life for creatures.
On the other hand, we have few arguments for animals in the zoo. Firstly, endangered
species are still alive because they are protected by people in the zoo. For example,
many disappearing animals are living in safe zoos than in the wild natural where they
could die out.
In conclusion, there are really important arguments both for animals zoo and against
animals zoo. Personally, I think they should stay in zoos with appropriate conditions
and also in wild nature without human's hands.