Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Table 7: Showing up at school on time

Table 7 shows if senior high school students show up at school on time. The highest rating that the scale
got was often on the Likert scale, which is 4.14 as the mean of the responses of 99 senior high school
students, which was that it is important for them to not be late. The average weighted mean was 3.39,
which describes sometimes showing up at school on time.

Students perceive that they sometimes show up at school on time because friends influence them to go
to school early and attend the flag ceremony. Students sometimes motivate and encourage their friends
to go early. Overall, students sometimes need encouragement and motivation from their friends to
show up at school on time and not be late.

Table 8: Positive rule models

How well-adjusted their friends are as role models for senior high school students is seen in Table 8.
According to the mean of the responses from 99 senior high school students, the Likert scale's highest
rating—which was that they often participate in school activities with their friends—was 3.92. The
average weighted mean of 3.71 describes how frequently their friends act as positive role models.

Students said that their friends often serve as positive role models for them. Their friends motivate
them to improve and do their schoolwork. Their friends motivate them to improve and do their
schoolwork. Because some students want to do well in school like their friends, their friends assist them
in improving their academic performance.

Table 9: Skipping class

Table 9 reveals if senior high school students are influenced by their friends to skip classes. The response
that they sometimes plan to skip classes received the highest rating on the Likert scale, 2.97, which
represents the mean of the responses from 99 senior high school students. The average weighted mean
was 2.43, which reflects how rarely their peers persuade them to skip class.

Students believed that they were rarely persuaded to skip classes by their peers. They refused to let
their friends' pressure to skip class convince them to do so. Instead of skipping class to hang out with
their friends, they would prefer to attend class.

Table: Napping during class

Table 10 indicates whether students in their senior year of high school are influenced by their friends to
take naps in class. The Likert scale's top response, which was that they napped in class with their friends,
had a mean score of 2.39, the highest possible score. This is the highest rating the scale has ever
received. The average weighted mean was 2.14, which reflects how rarely their friends persuade them
to take a nap in class.
Students believed that their buddies didn't often persuade them to take a nap in class. When their peers
are resting in class, they rarely nap themselves. They don't exploit the fact that their friends are dozing
off as an excuse for doing the same. They are generally not.

Table 11: Cheating

For seniors in high school, Table 11 reveals whether or not they are influenced by their classmates to
cheat. The majority of the 99 senior high school students who responded to the survey gave the Likert
scale the highest rating of 2.13, which indicates that they cheated since their peers advised them to do
so. The average weighted mean was 2.02, which reflects how rarely they are influenced by their peers to
cheat.

Students said that they were rarely persuaded to cheat on tests by their peers. They rejected their
friend's plan to cheat in order to get good grades. Overall, they showed no signs of falling under
unfavorable peer pressure.

You might also like