Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sentencing PDF
Sentencing PDF
result in them going to prison, but a conviction after trial would . A judge should
... .~ -
....o;.~.,:-->- - therefore soy, for example, 'If you change your plea to guilty now, I would
'C \ ...a.~ sentence you to no more than three years' imprisonment'.
·C:. ._p~~-
.~ b-~=>.:~ (c) The indication is binding for a reasonable period of time. It is open for a judge to
c.. c~ . . .
'"\ . ~c' soy precisely how long that reasonable period of time would be.
~:~~~ (d) During the reasonable period of time, the indication is binding on the judge who
mode it and any other judge unless Parliament changes the maximum sentence
L··.e-'--"'~
..(_....-~.!-QOI!.?.- for on offence or the Sentencing Guidelines for the offence ore changed .
Y~ 6_..........., If the judge chooses not to give on indication they should soy why they hove elected not
\/ to and ind icate if they would be willing to give an indication at a later stage in the
~
b '~\~
....
~= proceedings.
The starling point is that the court expects the parties to be able to deal with sentence
immediately following a guilty plea or verdict. Any application to adjourn or for a pre-
sentence report will not be automatically granted and is entirely at the discretion of the
court. With pre-sentence reports in particular, the court will want a justification as to
why time and resources should be used to prepare such a report. It expects Counsel to
be able to deal with any matters upon which they can properly toke instructions such as
the defendant's personal background . Reports are therefore usually constrained to
circumstances in which the court needs specific information from the Probation Service
such as the suitability for a particular form of sentence that involves their services, or the
assessment of dangerousness.
If the Magistrates' Court decides to adjourn sentence then they ore bound by statute as
to how long on adjournment may be. For a defendant on boil it's four weeks; where the
defendant is in custody, it' s three weeks. Note, however, there is nothing to prevent the
court from adjourning sentence more than once. --=-, """'~~ · 2l~·.,_;. .\c... ~ ,, _ .•
_::s:J ----- <::':>-<!.-""'- ~ ~
0..
c:,.. b:>-~ ~ r
\-.,
•. -::r:\. · ~=:. "'~ -c- -.J......,,_.,c::A ~
'\ -" ·
'--~ u~ -l,~ ),~~-
· \ -
'-..1'-.~ \ ~ ~. ...Q........, , ._ c~ -l..-"""- -4-o.:.. ' ~- ~ ""---
146 ('-. r
\L; ....\--e_...-"""" ~ ~ .......
~-- '
~
<..\c..~'" """'-=> •:o.- ~-c ""'·
-
Sentencing p...,..;;,;,..,;
Prosecution open
facts/make
submissions/
applications
Defence mitigate
Judge passes
sentence
1<:1
on to consider the next question: would it make a material difference to sentence if
defendant was sentenced on the basis of one kick and one punch rather than two of
both? Each case is fact specific but, given that the defendant accepts one of each, the
difference in sentence for the second punch and kick is likely to be minimal if anything
atoll.
54 The judge is therefore likely to conclude that the difference would not be material to
sentence. The defendant would therefore be sentenced on his account of one kick and
one punch .
59 Irrespective of whether the facts have been opened to the court or not, the prosecutor
should assist the court with :
(a) A list and details of the defendant's previous convictions if they think it
appropriate to bring them to the court's aHention
(b) Any ancillary orders that the prosecution seeks (e.g . costs, compensation) '----.n-
~ """---~-' ~
~--=-~~ <b~,c::
(c) Any relevant sentencing guidelines or statutory provisions r~ ..... ::lo ~ ~ o
(d) Any general sentencing issues to ensure that the sentence passed is lawful
~ 6--~ --.::;,·
60 Note, the prosecution don't ask the court to pass a specific sentence, nor do they
'
....d,. recommend a sp~cific sentence; that is entirely within the province of the court.
155
BPTC Criminal litigation, Evidence & Se!Ve<rOI:r.:
~, ~~~Character evidence
·.,_--~. .:.;;. -
..AO ,¥
!;:::~_,~
~.:>\
66 The defendant may wish to rely on c nx:~er _ - _ e way of either written
testimonials or live evidence. Written evidence:-- ::>: - --on with the agreement of
?-• ~ r..it <~..u-<~ the prosecution . Alternatively, a witness co oe - - >e usual way and be cross-
~cl vo.~~·" examine dby the prosecution i f I hey so w ish.
When a judge passes sentence, they must only sentence the defendant for the offence .
that they have pleaded or been found guilty of, save for two notable exceptions; sample
counts and offences taken into consideration.
Sample counts
70 , Where a defendant is alleged to have committed numerous offences over a long
period, rather than charging him with every single alleged instance, the prosecution can
decide instead to charge him with 'sample counts' to represent the course of offending . ~ '-cx:.ce~::.l
If the defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty, they will be sentenced to reAect that .._,.
overall period of offending . If this is the case, the prosecution must explain to the judge 0..: _
what the overall period is said to be. ~'- -
aken in consideration
-1 Where a suspect is arrested and admits carrying out on offence, the police may invite
the suspect to admit further offences that could be 'taken into consideration' when he
goes to court. An example of where this commonly occurs is burglary where a suspect is
invited to 'clear his conscience' (and police crime statistics!) by making admissions as to
further burglaries. At court he will be invited to sign a list of offences taken into account.
The benefit to the defendant is that he is bound to face a lower sentence than if each of 6.;.,::,- 0 ,,"t-J.......
these offences had been included on the charge sheet or indictment. ~~..,_......,...
--~ ( . o , c:.:
s~ntencing guidelines
-2 The Sentencing Council (http://sentencingcouncil.judiciary.gov.uk/) are responsible for
publishing definitive sentencing guidelines for criminal offences. Whilst there aren't yet
guidelines for every single offence known at law, the overwhelming majority of those
regularly charged ore covered by a guideline.
-3 The court must follow the sentencing guidelines when passing sentence for an offence.
They are guidelines and not tramlines so they do afford the court some flexibility in
determining what the sentence will be.
-4 For the purposes of the Criminal litigation assessment you will not be required to
memorise the content of the guidelines. Instead you are expected to know how they
work. You will gain some experience of using them during the Advocacy and
Conference modules.
The first step for the court is to assess which category a defendant's conduct falls into:
(a) Greater culpability and greater harm
(b) Greater culpability and lesser harm, or greater harm and lesser culpability
(c) lesser culpability and lesser harm
The court does this by reference to the general factors on culpability and harm as well
as those particular to the offence. The parties will usually be invited to make submissions
as to which category a defendant falls into. Once the court has decided on the
category, this will give them a category range within which the defendant's sentence
should fall and a starting point within that range.
~
Next, the court goes on to consider the aggravating and mitigating factors particular to ~ Z
the offender. Again, there are general aggravating and mitigating factors but each _
guideline also sets out those particular to that offence. ' I..\7...U"'- ~-...._:~ 0~
~~ ·. ~ \ 0 . ~ ~ '-"-<""'-- ,,~
-::. ~~~ ~~~~~
e five purposes of sentencing o.:~ ~e.~
..... ,....., ~~-.::!'"~ , __ ~ . '"') ~
-:~ When sentencing a defendant the court must bear in mind the five purposes of ~~~
sentencing set out in s 142(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
'(a) the punishment of offenders
(b) the reduction of crime {including its reduction by deterrence}
{c) the reform and rehabilitation of offenders
(d) the protection of the public
(e) the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offence'
The purposes are given equal weight though in a particular case some may be more
important than others; _ _ r ;"X:.'JG..,..,
~~e.-=~ ~<6 ~q_~-c=e-.:;, "~ '-=-
Aggravating factors
85 Common aggravating factors:
158
(k) Commission of the offence for financial gain (where this is not inherent in the
offence itsel~
(I) High level of profit from the offence
::ny (bb) Offence is committed against those working in the public sector or providing a
service to the public
(cc) Presence of others e.g . relatives, especially children or partner of the victim
(dd) Additional degradation of the victim (e.g . taking photographs of a victim as part
of a sexual offence)
(ee) In property offences, high value (including sentimental value) of property to the
victim, or substantial consequential loss (e.g . where the theft of equipment causes
serious disruption to a victim's life or business)
Mitigating factors
86 Common mitigating factors:
(a) A greater degree of provocation than normally expected
(b) Mental illness or disability
(c) Youth or age, where it affects the responsibility of the individual defendant
(d) The fact that the offender played only a minor role in the offence
(e) Any personal mitigation
:>angerousness
87 Where a defendant has been convicted of a 'specified' offence, the court must consider
the issue of dangerousness. A specified offence is one which appears in Schedule 15 of \0
the Criminal Justice Act 2003 . A serious specified offence is one that is specified and ~"'-
-the maximum senteR~e i' aitha~ life or g determinate sentence of ten years or more. \
L-=, ~ C>G--·0'-'= ~·.:.---:~ ~~ ~~~-=- '~ C::.•-c- ~ ,_ e,i'·~ -~ ~
~ ~~.:.... ......:;> ,,'{..,_ ";;>- 0 ~-.::,..lo,...,._ ......... --o'-=- ,:-,.,__,~ ..... ~~
_ -e.-,- 0 ..,...._,..~~ _, 159
\0 "-; cs...-.. ~::.:- ·- -..........o •--c-. •