Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EDM 203 Methods of Research - Critique Paper 3
EDM 203 Methods of Research - Critique Paper 3
EDM 203 Methods of Research - Critique Paper 3
Critique Paper 3
(Mixed Methods Research)
Directions: Read the paper of Di Malta, G., Bond, J., Conroy, D., Smith, K., &
Moller, N. (2022) titled “Distance Education Students’ Mental Health,
Connectedness and Academic Performance During COVID-19: A Mixed-Methods
Study.” Make a five-page (reference list not included in the page count) critique of
the paper following the structure indicated below and by answering the guide
questions listed. You may cite other legitimate literatures to substantiate your
critique and conclusion. Use a Times New Roman font (if available in your laptop
or cellphone), size 12, and double-spaced. Follow the APA 7th edition format in
your in-text citation and reference list.
Submitted by:
Ms. Fragile T. Billones
MaEd Student
Submitted to:
Mr. Alvin D. Tenorio
Instructor
I. Introduction
Distance education becomes a viable option to continue education when the COVID-19 pandemic
strikes the country. A seminal article by Keegan (1980) presents key aspects of distance education. Some of the
elements are: physical separation of teacher and learner; learning occurs in the context of an educational
institution; technical media are used; teacher and learner communicate; face-to-face meetings are possible; and
an industrial model of providing education is used. Although distance education is the best acceleration of
response during a pandemic, there are advantages and disadvantages to distance education. Some of the
advantages are self-paced study, time and space flexibility, time savings (no commute between home and
school), and the fact that a distance learning course often costs less. Disadvantages include a sense of isolation,
the struggle with staying motivated, a lack of face-to-face interaction, difficulty getting immediate feedback, the
need for constant and reliable access to technology, and occasionally some difficulty with accreditation (De
Paepe, Zhu, & Depryck, 2018; Lei & Gupta, 2010; Venter, 2003; Zuhairi, Wahyono, & Suratinah, 2006).
However, distance education has had a great impact on the mental health of students, as has their academic
performance. The main problems experienced by students include anxiety, mild and severe stress, social media
fatigue, and depression. At the same time, the symptoms are not always caused by mental health problems
Synthesis
The study of G. DI MALTA ET AL. (2022), titled "DISTANCE EDUCATION STUDENTS’ MENTAL
METHODS STUDY" investigated the links between distance education students’ mental health, connectedness,
and academic performance during COVID-19. Through an online survey with 208 distance education students,
they analyzed the data using multiple regression, mediation, and content analysis. Connectedness (loneliness
and a sense of connection to the university) mediated links between mental health (well-being and anxiety) and
academic performance. A subsample analysis of students who met clinical concern thresholds for anxiety and
well-being revealed that poorer well-being was associated with less emotional intimacy, more loneliness, and
poorer self-reported academic performance. Anxiety was associated with less emotional intimacy, higher
relational intensity with one person, and poorer self-reported academic performance. These pathways were
of actions in the relationship between mental health and academic performance. They also formulate research
questions for this investigation, and these are: RQ1. Does connectedness mediate the relationship between
mental health and academic performance? RQ2. For students who meet clinical thresholds for low wellbeing or
anxiety disorders, how is connectedness associated with mental health? RQ3. What are students’ experiences of
students, and these have been covered adequately and clearly connected to the presents study. The findings of
the previous studies also help to figure out the present study and it was critically evaluated.
3.
Sequential explanatory design is a mixed-method design which researchers begin by conducting a
quantitative phase and follows up on specific results with a subsequent qualitative phase (Creswell & Plano
Clark, 2018). This is an appropriate design used by the authors where the quantitative phase is they explore
relationship between mental health variables (wellbeing and anxiety), the five connectedness variables (campus
connectedness, emotional intimacy and relational depth with a significant person at university, relational depth
with all people at the university, and loneliness) and the two academic variables (mean academic grade and self-
reported academic performance) (RQ1 & RQ2). Then, the qualitative phase aimed to allow better understanding
of the relationships between variables and contextualization of the statistical results (RQ3). Moreover, it
provided triangulation for the quantitative findings as well as illustrations of students’ experiences of
\
4.
Online survey consisted of self-report scales and open-ended questions using data collecting software
was used to gather the information. The authors make sure that the participants recruited are eligible which are
the students aged 18+ and studying at Open University. Through email, authors sent a pool to approximately
2000 students during their second module. They have well analyzed and synthesized all the information they
between mental health, connectedness, and academic performance in a distance education context. In the
context, they found that student connectedness is associated with less anxiety and better academic performance.
Furthermore, lack of connectedness (loneliness) is a mechanism of action in the link between mental health
(wellbeing and anxiety) and academic performance. In other words, being lonely increases the chances of poor
academic performance in students with worse mental health. A sense of connection to university, on the other
hand, mitigates the experience of loneliness and its impact on mental health (well-being and anxiety). These
findings are consistent with different previous studies that could give more insights for the resolution of the
research study, and the previous studies help to understand and figure out what is in the paper. It is also seen in
their research paper how they applied the mixed-methods research design. They explained what is meant by
quantitative and qualitative research. And there are the strengths of the paper.
7.
The only weakness found in the research paper is that it is too broad, which means it has too many
sources. The authors have many previous studies just to cover their topic, but there are some that are unfocused.
The title of the study is “Distance Education Students’ Mental Health, Connectedness and Academic
Performance During COVID-19: A mixed-methods study". The researchers wanted to investigate the links
between distance education students’ mental health, connectedness, and academic performance during COVID-
19 using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. They did this through an online survey with 208
distance education students. Then, they were analyzed using multiple regression, mediation, and content
analysis. Connectedness (loneliness and a sense of connection to the university) mediated links between mental
health (well-being and anxiety) and academic performance. A subsample analysis with students who met
clinical concern thresholds for anxiety and wellbeing (n 1⁄4 123) revealed that poorer wellbeing was associated
with less emotional intimacy, more loneliness, and poorer self-reported academic performance. Anxiety was
associated with less emotional intimacy, higher relational intensity with one person, and poorer self-reported
academic performance. These pathways were triangulated and contextualized within students’ experiences of
connectedness. Future research using a longitudinal design is needed to establish causal links.
To conclude the study, the researchers found that student connectedness is associated with less anxiety
and better academic performance. Furthermore, lack of connectedness (loneliness) is a mechanism of action in
the link between mental health (wellbeing and anxiety) and academic performance. In other words, being lonely
increases the chances of poor academic performance in students with worse mental health. A sense of
connection to the university, on the other hand, mitigates the experience of loneliness and its impact on mental
health (well-being and anxiety). In qualitative findings, provide descriptions of students’ experiences of
connectedness and triangulation for the quantitative findings. These suggest that students appeared less likely to
have had significant moments of connection at the university when they were less satisfied with their self-rated
academic performance. To point out the lack of a paper, the authors should limit their previous studies to
References:
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyk, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance
education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher
Education, 17(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
Wang, Y. (2023). The research on the impact of distance learning on students’ mental health. Education and
Information Technologies.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11693-w