Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    Family Law 1 CLASS NOTES 2

    Uploaded by

    ALOK TOMAR
    1. The document discusses several court cases related to divorce, nullity, and DNA evidence. 2. One case discusses whether DNA evidence can be used to prove access or adultery. Another case discusses consequences of nullity versus divorce, with nullity meaning a marriage is deemed never valid. 3. Causes of action that allow nullity petitions have different consequences than divorce, as under the Indian Succession Act, a child conceived before nullity is still considered legitimate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Family Law 1 CLASS NOTES 2

    Uploaded by

    ALOK TOMAR
    19 views4 pages
    1. The document discusses several court cases related to divorce, nullity, and DNA evidence. 2. One case discusses whether DNA evidence can be used to prove access or adultery. Another case discusses consequences of nullity versus divorce, with nullity meaning a marriage is deemed never valid. 3. Causes of action that allow nullity petitions have different consequences than divorce, as under the Indian Succession Act, a child conceived before nullity is still considered legitimate.

    Original Description:

    notes on family law 1

    Original Title

    family law 1 CLASS NOTES 2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1. The document discusses several court cases related to divorce, nullity, and DNA evidence. 2. One case discusses whether DNA evidence can be used to prove access or adultery. Another case discusses consequences of nullity versus divorce, with nullity meaning a marriage is deemed never valid. 3. Causes of action that allow nullity petitions have different consequences than divorce, as under the Indian Succession Act, a child conceived before nullity is still considered legitimate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    19 views4 pages

    Family Law 1 CLASS NOTES 2

    Uploaded by

    ALOK TOMAR
    1. The document discusses several court cases related to divorce, nullity, and DNA evidence. 2. One case discusses whether DNA evidence can be used to prove access or adultery. Another case discusses consequences of nullity versus divorce, with nullity meaning a marriage is deemed never valid. 3. Causes of action that allow nullity petitions have different consequences than divorce, as under the Indian Succession Act, a child conceived before nullity is still considered legitimate.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 4

    i

    T.aie

    the petitioer S nvolue di.


    a x i t a l . intescouSeatex geti
    So'cb
    Anowlecle pregnanCy an.
    wilost be anted,

    Conclosive hat Pe
    ohic hCannof be xebuthes b0
    vi evicleAce.

    Nila owwo V MbrottD 204


    KarnataR HC
    bild aS ater161da
    oK KaYTiag usband Said ha
    aCces S to the uo Ma Rnew hex qd
    meuwitd be bot oe Se Ual
    Yclatiornship. Mar, ashed
    est. Wsman CkssedSaiot
    is a bseach pxiva o
    i d ao t i s Aot bseach o priso
    Coort osder ed DNA testand i
    was discovE }ed_ tha h echildw
    celutedfofe
    net beisqical
    man aull asaanted
    Roo Pshsi V. Ksishnaguda l20 20Karnaaba

    Question uas Can NA evidenciAbe


    exdexe d do psove nD dCCessS.
    co.habitationis there then the CoOXt

    does nof allow the defenceonon-access


    based OD DNA evidenCt

    Manas Koma Rar V. 3iaaya Mishr


    L2D 203_Osissa A.C
    Husband payed
    DNA DNA Cvidencing
    his wieBaS Committcd.
    Sayina husband hoS
    add
    adu t.
    ltexg (ount Said
    do Sub f 22 acs wifh he
    6amilN CoUxt. J8his clai a S
    CoxEC+ he ant wilL be eforned
    claim is incossect st will
    but i +he
    be qiven fo 4hewihe as Compensas

    Adverse a e s ence

    Vandan a Kumari VP Praveed Kumar


    mad efuses to go
    NA test adeKSe inereace
    Ca be against hey.

    Urmila Kumari L97sS


    BaldeoRai Miglani Ve

    A child s a s boTN ithin 66-S months


    mootbhs

    atexmarTiage uestion c 3 hetheY


    she was
    PEnant behore
    we argued 1hat hechild
    as c pC-metvxe Child Co bosi
    Said es and the hosb and
    the fther. Jn SC mcdica S
    evidences
    the cbild was
    were Subm1ted pro

    Aelievexed OOs nal ngood health o


    thereare many our Saic
    matur o evideACes rovin.
    the child Ovi,
    waS aranted în thisCase Nullity.
    CaSe.

    Censeq vence oh Notlit &


    Di voY ce : Conseq, uCnCE_al

    T child S ConceiVed
    eer e
    deemed ebe
    etimofe a chil SCe nCeiv¢d
    beore VorCe tS esisiate.
    AdivOrCed Spouse not have
    uiealioheri ance Simlasl
    e Co SCb ecCe a0u flneo
    O e Carroiclui ainaneCe.
    Cause o ac o
    which enflleS elie

    Rebha Mafbur V. Manish Khan Da


    Delhi HC. C2o1S'S
    whileaCoSe. o nullst
    oS OD SokCU e
    he aLOUC,O
    leda CoSe o clivoe
    CoUst
    woxded disvOKCe irston
    dissolNed he maysd a Whefhe he
    àecseeok dtsso luion
    icou. O

    the CaSe aulli


    ercainS.
    actieo gBill Del
    BC aaecd haf te Coso Oul
    Soutd Stll re f a i S OSC auseerisie
    ave a dile xent e Conecq,UEnce

    India Succession Au
    305 30 o

    You might also like