Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment 1 Overview 22W
Experiment 1 Overview 22W
Experiment 1 Overview 22W
EXPERIMENT 1
Quantitative Determination of Lead
in a Contaminated Drinking Water Supply
PRE-LAB REQUIREMENTS
• Virtual Lab:
• Complete the Virtual Lab Experiment 1 Tutorial on Gravimetric Analysis
• Bring the Feedback Form, for Evaluation Question(s) to the lab (printed
or screenshot)
Do not attempt to leave all of the above work until the last minute.
You will be overwhelmed and poorly prepared for the lab if you do.
Experiment 1 Overview
Rationale: This experiment demonstrates some standard techniques used in analytical chemistry, a
branch of chemistry that deals with the identification, measurement and quantification of small
amounts of components in a complex mixture. These techniques are also fundamental within the fields
of synthetic inorganic, organic and materials chemistry.
The paragraph below is adapted from the articles “Lead” and “Lead, Toxicology” from the Kirk-
Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. The Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology
is an online resource available through the UBC Library’s website. There are thousands of articles,
written by scientific experts, that cover every aspect of how chemistry is used within modern society.
As examples, there are articles on metals, metallurgy, chemical engineering, biochemical processes,
pharmaceuticals, artist’s dyes, paints and polymers as well as on specific topics such as sulfuric acid,
phosphate fertilizers, ammonia or sodium hydroxide. There are articles on the chemistry of candy,
chocolate, breakfast cereal, spirits, beer, paints, perfumes and fragrances, batteries and gasoline. The
Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (and Ullman’s Encyclopedia on Industrial
Chemistry, also available online through the UBC Library) should be the first place you consult
throughout your University career if you are looking for reputable information about chemistry or a
chemical that is used in modern society.
Background.
This element occurs naturally in the Earth’s crust, and was one of the first metals to be used by humans
thousands of years ago – probably because it was easy to find, extract and use. The primary use of lead
and its compounds today is within lead-acid batteries, such as standard car batteries.
Lead poisoning.
Humans have recognized the toxic effects of materials containing lead since the fourth century BCE.
Lead and its compounds are among the most well-studied environmental toxicants. Lead poisoning
disproportionally affects individuals in low-income or minority populations.
Lead exposure occurs mostly through inhalation of lead in air and dust, affecting those individuals
working in or living near industrial sources such as metal smelters, mines and coal-fired power plants.
The occupational exposure for workers in these industries is closely monitored.
The accidental ingestion of lead or its compounds is a second source of human exposure. Drinking water
rarely exceeds standards recommended by government agencies for lead before it flows into a system
of distribution pipes. But once water is distributed, it can flow through lead pipes, pipes with fittings
that contain lead solder, or fixtures that contain lead within homes. If the water is more acidic (pH 7.3 vs
pH 8-10) or a water utility does not control for corrosion, the protective film in the pipes can be
compromised, and lead can leach into drinking water. This type of pipe corrosion led to Flint, Michigan’s
drinking water contamination in 2014, and Washington, D.C.’s in the early 2000’s. For those interested,
more detailed, optional information is available at the end of this overview.
Generally, infants and children (those under 15) are much more susceptible than adults in absorbing
lead, in part because lead behaves similarly to calcium, a nutrient that children absorb at a higher rate
than adults. Childhood (0-3 years) is a particularly vulnerable period as there are distinct
neurodevelopments that occur in that development window.
In this experiment, you will act as a technician in an environmental analytical chemistry laboratory.
You are tasked with determining the lead content in a water sample.
Experiment 1 Overview
EXPERIMENT 1
Quantitative Determination of Lead
in a Contaminated Drinking Water Supply
AIM
To master the principles of gravimetric quantitative analysis and to determine the lead content of a
sample using these techniques.
OBJECTIVES:
Design and develop an experimental procedure for a gravimetric analysis.
Determine appropriate glassware needed to perform the experiment.
Describe the difference between qualitative and quantitative analysis.
Precipitate lead ions as an insoluble lead salt.
Master gravimetric quantitative analysis techniques.
Quantitatively determine the lead content in an unknown sample.
Assess the human health risk of the lead content in the water sample.
To achieve the objectives of this experiment, you should understand the following:
Types of Analysis:
Quantitative analysis
• determines the amount of a specified element or substance in a sample
Qualitative analysis
• tells you what substances or elements are present in a sample, but little information on amounts is
gained
Gravimetric Analysis
• Gravimetric analysis means analysis by weighing. Three conditions must be met before using
gravimetric analysis:
o The substance being analyzed has to be separable from its contaminants or impurities.
o There needs to be 0.1 mg or more of the substance being analyzed.
o The separated substance must be in a form that can be weighed on an analytical balance.
When these conditions are met, the gravimetric technique is a simple, inexpensive and highly accurate
technique.
Experiment 1 Overview
Public Health Information Exposures to lead by an individual can be obtained by the measurement
of the amount of lead in a blood sample. Small amounts of lead in the
blood represents relatively large amounts of lead elsewhere in the body:
lead accumulates in bones, kidneys, and liver, and a small fraction
circulates in the bloodstream.
The Experiment
LAB PROJECT SUMMARY
Perform an experiment as follows:
1. Quantitatively obtain and dissolve an unknown lead sample.
2. Precipitate the lead ions as an insoluble lead salt.
3. Quantitatively isolate and dry the lead salt.
4. Weigh the mass of dried lead salt to four decimal places.
5. Calculate the mass % of Pb in the unknown lead sample.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Dissolve
Weigh the the Weigh the
Precipitate Isolate Dry
sample sample product
While you read through the procedure, consider the general concepts in the left-hand column and think
about questions in purple text using your answers to help you develop your own experimental
procedure and improve your lab skills.
The lead dissolved in the sample in the • Remove the beaker from the hotplate
previous step now needs to form an and place on a ceramic tile. Precipitate
insoluble precipitate, ready for isolating • Slowly add the sulfate solution while
in the next step. stirring with a stirring rod.
The addition of sulfate ions to the Q: How accurate does the amount of
dissolved lead (II) will form an insoluble sulfate solution have to be?
precipitate, PbSO4. (Ksp at 25°C for PbSO4 Q: Which piece of glassware is appropriate to measure it
is 1.6 x 10-8). out?
Q: Once you have stirred the solution, what should you
Pb2+(aq) + SO42-(aq) → PbSO4(s)
do with the stirring rod?
Q: Assuming that the entire unknown
• Allow the precipitate to settle for a few minutes.
was lead, how many mL of sulfate
solution would you need to completely • Cover the beaker with a watch glass and sustain boiling
precipitate the lead ions? for 10 minutes. This process is called “digestion”
Q: Why should the beaker be covered with a watch glass?
Calculation Help: Experiment 1 Virtual
Q: Why do you think digestion is important?
Lab - Gravimetric Analysis (step 2
• Then cool the beaker, using a cool air gun, until it is cold
Digestion enough to handle (about the same temperature as a
During digestion, small particles dissolve warm cup of coffee)
and larger ones grow. It is an important
practical process in gravimetric analysis Important safety notes on heating the solution:
as it aids with filtration. If the solution gets too hot, “bumping” may occur and the
solution can start spitting out of the beaker. If this happens,
turn down the hotplate, carefully remove the watch glass and
place a stirring rod in the beaker. Replace the watch glass.
Experiment 1 Overview
The precipitate must be completely dry in • Final drying can be achieved by placing the glass
order to determine its mass. crucible in the oven for 30 minutes.
Precise weighing is achieved only when the • Remove the crucible from the
crucible and precipitate have cooled to room oven. Use an oven mitt as it is very Weigh the
temperature. If a sample is still warm, it will hot! product
weigh less because of buoyancy due to
• Cool to room temperature.
upward circulation of hot air.
Q: Why does the crucible have to
Double check that you are still meeting the be cooled to room temperature?
precision requirements of quantitative • Weigh using the same analytical balance as you used
analysis. to weigh the crucible the first time.
Q: Why use the same balance?
Experiment 1 Overview
CLEAN UP
Glassware Rinse all glassware with tap water and return it to the
basket, following the clean-up instructions provided
PRE-LAB CHECKLIST
Make sure to do the following before you do the experiment:
Read through all the components of the experiment
Complete the Virtual Lab and bring the feedback form to lab (screenshot or printout)
Complete the pre-lab quiz. You can be tested on techniques, calculations and the experimental
overview
Complete IN PEN the pre-lab part of the EDF, including glassware/equipment and chemicals
needed, calculation for the amount of sodium sulfate needed and the procedure
The more you prepare for the wet lab the easier your experiment will seem. Familiarize yourself with:
• your own procedure so you are aware of the order the experimental steps are performed
• any techniques in the experiment
• calculations you will need to complete to analyze your data to gain results
SUBMISSION DEADLINES
Task Submit (where) Submit (when)
Prepare for lab:
• Read experimental overview
• Read online material
Before the start of your
Complete EDF (Pre-lab) Bring to lab
scheduled lab session**
Bring Feedback Form to lab Before the start of your
Virtual Lab Tutorial
(screenshot or printout) scheduled lab session**
Before the start of your
Complete the Pre-lab Quiz In Canvas
scheduled lab session**
Before the end of your
Complete EDF (In-lab) In the lab
scheduled lab session
**No late submissions
Experiment 1 Overview
Extra Information:
Flint Water Crisis
In April 2014, the city of Flint, Michigan changed its water supply from Detroit (sourced from Lake
Huron) to the Flint River as a cost-saving measure. Soon after the switch, Flint residents became
concerned about the colour, taste, and odour of the drinking water. Residents soon had health
complaints. The drinking water had elevated levels of lead.
The lead in a water distribution system derives from a) the physical flaking of corrosion scale (a mix of
PbCO3, Pb3(CO3)2(OH)2, Pb10(CO3)6(OH)6O, PbO, and PbO2) and b) the dissolution of corrosion scale. Theis
scale forms on the inside of lead pipes. Both this corrosion scale and the exposed lead pipe can release
lead into the water.
A number of factors caused increased lead corrosion from the Flint Raver water system: 1) absence of
an orthophosphate corrosion inhibitor, 2) lower pH of the water, and 3) high chloride levels.
1) In the water from Detroit, orthophosphate was added in order to encourage the formation of a low-
solubility lead-phosphate complex inside lead pipes, protecting the pipes from corrosion.
Orthophosphate was not added to Flint River water and the protective layer dissolved, exposing the
bare metal pipe.
2) The pH of Flint River water was not controlled, changing from pH 8 in December 2014 to pH 7.3 in
August 2015. The solubility of lead corrosion scale increases as pH lowers. In fact, Boston, another city
with a lot of lead pipes, maintains a pH of 9.6 in its water in order to minimize lead corrosion.
3) High chloride levels, in particular high chloride-to-sulfate ratios, will lead to increased lead corrosion
because chloride will react with metals in the pipes. Flint River water naturally has much higher chloride
levels than Detroit water. To make matters worse, a series of water treatment actions further increased
the chloride levels. First, excess chlorine was added to combat E. coli contamination. This resulted in the
reaction of organic matter and chlorine to form toxic trihalomethanes, which was in turn addressed by
adding iron (III) chloride, further increasing the chloride levels.
Lead in drinking water disproportionately affects children and pregnant mothers. Children can absorb
40-50% of lead in water (compared to 3-10% for adults). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC) define blood lead level (BLL) to be elevated at above 0.05 mg/L. Hanna-Attisha et al. found that
the percentage of children with elevated BLL rose significantly: from 2.4% to 4.9% in some areas of Flint,
and from 4% to 10.6% in areas with the highest water lead levels.
The Flint Water Crisis became a political controversy that was widely covered in the media in late 2015
and early 2016. Class-action lawsuits have been filed against various government officials for gross
negligence leading to serious injuries from lead poisoning.
Hanna-Attisha, M.; LaChance, J.; Sadler, R. C.; Schnepp, A. C. Am. J. Public Health 2016, 106(2), 283-290.
Kim, E. J.; Herrara, J. E.; Huggins, D.; Braam, J.; Koshowski, S. Water Res. 2011, 45, 2763-2774.
Torrice, M. Chem. Eng. News 2016, 94(7), 26-29. http://cen.acs.org/articles/94/i7/Lead-Ended-Flints-
Tap-Water.html