Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Lampiran 15

    Uploaded by

    manik
    This document contains statistical analysis of data on 10 subjects. It includes measures of central tendency and dispersion for variables like age (LILA), risk level, and opinion level. Correlation analysis found a significant positive correlation between age and health burden (HB). Regression analysis showed age (LILA) predicts HB. Tests found equal variances and no difference in age between risk levels. A chi-square test found a significant association between risk level and opinion level, with higher risk associated with lower opinion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Lampiran 15

    Uploaded by

    manik
    9 views4 pages
    This document contains statistical analysis of data on 10 subjects. It includes measures of central tendency and dispersion for variables like age (LILA), risk level, and opinion level. Correlation analysis found a significant positive correlation between age and health burden (HB). Regression analysis showed age (LILA) predicts HB. Tests found equal variances and no difference in age between risk levels. A chi-square test found a significant association between risk level and opinion level, with higher risk associated with lower opinion.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    lampiran15

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document contains statistical analysis of data on 10 subjects. It includes measures of central tendency and dispersion for variables like age (LILA), risk level, and opinion level. Correlation analysis found a significant positive correlation between age and health burden (HB). Regression analysis showed age (LILA) predicts HB. Tests found equal variances and no difference in age between risk levels. A chi-square test found a significant association between risk level and opinion level, with higher risk associated with lower opinion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    9 views4 pages

    Lampiran 15

    Uploaded by

    manik
    This document contains statistical analysis of data on 10 subjects. It includes measures of central tendency and dispersion for variables like age (LILA), risk level, and opinion level. Correlation analysis found a significant positive correlation between age and health burden (HB). Regression analysis showed age (LILA) predicts HB. Tests found equal variances and no difference in age between risk levels. A chi-square test found a significant association between risk level and opinion level, with higher risk associated with lower opinion.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 4

    Lampiran

    3.

    Statistics
    LILA

    N Valid 10

    Missing 0
    Mean 23.00
    Median 23.00
    Std. Deviation 2.211
    Minimum 20
    Maximum 27

    4.

    kat lila

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid beresiko KEK 6 60.0 60.0 60.0

    tidak beresiko KEK 4 40.0 40.0 100.0

    Total 10 100.0 100.0

    5.

    kat pendapat

    Cumulative
    Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

    Valid rendah 5 50.0 50.0 50.0

    tinggi 5 50.0 50.0 100.0

    Total 10 100.0 100.0

    6.

    Tests of Normality

    Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

    Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

    pendapatan .194 10 .200*


    .887 10 .157
    LILA .200 10 .200*
    .939 10 .539
    HB .174 10 .200*
    .952 10 .691
    *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
    a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

    7.

    Correlations

    LILA HB

    LILA Pearson Correlation 1 .756*

    Sig. (2-tailed) .011

    N 10 10
    HB Pearson Correlation .756* 1

    Sig. (2-tailed) .011

    N 10 10

    *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).


    8.

    Coefficientsa

    Standardized
    Unstandardized Coefficients Coefficients

    Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.

    1 (Constant) 1.691 2.896 .584 .575

    LILA .409 .125 .756 3.262 .011

    a. Dependent Variable: HB

    9.

    Test of Homogeneity of Variances


    LILA

    Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

    4.267 1 8 .073

    ANOVA
    LILA

    Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

    Between Groups .000 1 .000 .000 1.000


    Within Groups 44.000 8 5.500
    Total 44.000 9

    10.

    kat pendapatan * kat LILA Crosstabulation

    kat LILA

    tidak berisiko
    berisiko KEK KEK Total

    kat pendapatan rendah Count 5 0 5

    % within kat pendapatan 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%

    tinggi Count 1 4 5

    % within kat pendapatan 20.0% 80.0% 100.0%


    Total Count 6 4 10

    % within kat pendapatan 60.0% 40.0% 100.0%


    Chi-Square Tests

    Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-


    Value df sided) sided) sided)

    Pearson Chi-Square 6.667a 1 .010


    Continuity Correctionb 3.750 1 .053
    Likelihood Ratio 8.456 1 .004
    Fisher's Exact Test .048 .024
    Linear-by-Linear Association 6.000 1 .014
    N of Valid Cases 10

    a. 4 cells (100.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00.
    b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

    Risk Estimate

    95% Confidence Interval

    Value Lower Upper

    For cohort kat LILA =


    5.000 .866 28.861
    berisiko KEK
    N of Valid Cases 10

    You might also like